No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Azria Health Prairie Ridge

608 Prairie Street, Mediapolis, IA 52637 · For profit - Corporation · 62 certified beds · (319) 394-3991 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (319) 394-3991 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026Resident-funds citation (F0566)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0566)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
109 Washington St · (319) 868-4231 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
526 Main St · (319) 394-3420 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
111 Wapello St N · (319) 394-3236 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
120 Harrison St · (319) 394-3345

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.3%17.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.2%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection10.8%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%4.2%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.8%3.8%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.9%16.6%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.1%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.2%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.5%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.8%19.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%2.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.1%73.3%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.3%20.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.3%13.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.121.491.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.332.081.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 76 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
29.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 29.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.4%CMS range 35.9–57.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.3%CMS range 9.6–18.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge29.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.5–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
0.57
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.33
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.50
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
49.2%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 59.5 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-06)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 50 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately assess and implement a physician order to prevent the worsening of a moisture associated skin damage (MASD) wound for 1 of 2 resident (Resident #18) with a history of MASD. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #18, dated 10/14/25, identified an admission date of 10/8/25. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. The diagnoses list included diabetes, incontinence without sensory awareness and morbid obesity. The assessment identified the resident had moisture associated skin damage (MASD).The BIMS completed for the 4/9/26 MDS indicated intact cognition based on a score of 15 out of 15.Review of Resident #18 Care Plan dated 10/31/25, revealed a Focus area to address I have frequent redness irritant to skin folds that require antifungal treatment as needed. Interventions initiated on 10/31/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, odor free, comfortable and homelike environment in 31 of 32 resident rooms, 2 of 2 shower rooms, and 2 of 3 hallways throughout the facility. The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings included: 1. During a continuous observation from 8:26 AM to 12:30 PM on 5/11/26 a walk through completed for all resident rooms. The facility had a total of 32 resident rooms, with 16 rooms on the 100 Hall (East); 15 rooms on the 200 Hall (South) and one room on the 300 Hall (West). During the observation the following noted: a. Room entrances missing a transition strip, discolored yellow, brown and black with dirt particles embedded in rooms: 101,102, 103, 106, 107, 108, 109, 111, 112, 114, 117, 119, 202, 204, 205, 206, 207, 210, 211, 212, 214, 215 and 217. b. Black marks on and/or across the lower part of the resident room doors and frames in rooms: 104, 106, 107, 109, 111,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on employee record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a thorough background check for 1 of 5 employees reviewed for background checks. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: Review of the employee record for Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) revealed a start date of 7/16/25. The Single Contact License & Background check (SING) dated 7/14/25. revealed: Child Abuse: Initiate record check evaluation process by completing form [PHONE NUMBER] and submitting to HHS (Health and Human Services) The employee file lacked documentation of any further documentation for the evaluation of child abuse. During an interview on 5/14/26 at 2:57 PM, the Business Office/Human Resource Manager queried on Staff A SING report and she stated she missed the child abuse section. She stated she reviewed the dependent abuse and sex offender sections. The Business Office/Human Resources stated the facility suspended Staff A and the facility submitted for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and homelike environment by ensuring the metal guard was in place over the heating elements of a baseboard heater in the dining room and front sitting room located inside the main entrance of the facility and failed to ensure a the replacement of the molding trim at the base of a window in the dining room. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings included: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #7 dated 3/12/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. During an interview on 5/11/26 at 12:07 PM, Resident #7 reported being upset about conditions in the dining room. Resident #7 explained that there was a piece of missing window trim molding for a window in the dining room and the guard was missing for the baseboard heater in the dining room. Per the resident, both items had been missing for more than a year. During an observation on 5/11/26 at 1:55 PM in the main dinging…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure ongoing, personalized interventions for residents to address alcohol consumption by residents at the facility and to address alcohol being shared between residents at the facility for 4 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #13, and Resident #19) for alcohol use; failed to keep a medication secured in a medication cart resulting in a resident accessing a topical pain relief medication with possible ingestion of the medication per facility staff for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for inadequate nursing supervision (Resident #10); and failed to conduct a smoking evaluation during admission for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated on 4/9/26 revealed Resident #13 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility to ensure staff served food at a palatable temperature to residents who requested a room tray for 1 of 1 meal service observations. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings included:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #20 dated 3/19/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. During an interview on 5/11/26 at 12:07 PM, Resident #20 stated the food at the facility was horrible. Resident #20 described the food as cold and not tasting good. Resident #20 explained they ate their food in their room and always requested a room tray.During an observation on 5/12/26 that started at 7:55 AM, Staff R, Cook, started breakfast service, while Staff S, Cook, assisted with getting drinks, silverware and other requested condiments for residents and then handing the trays off to Certified Nursing Assistants…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to serve food based on resident preference for 1 out of 1 meals services observed (Residents #1, Resident #5 and Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 57.Findings included: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #1, dated 3/12/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses listed included diabetes, dementia, morbid obesity and abnormal weight loss.Review of the Care Plan for Resident #1, revised 6/19/25 revealed a Focus area to address I am at nutritional risk .MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment): 10 (6/09): At Risk of Malnutrition. Interventions include, in part: Offer an alternate if dislikes food/fluids given/on menu and offer flavored beverages or water between meals within fluid restriction if resident is on fluid restriction. Date Initiated: 09/11/2024. 2. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #5, dated 4/7/26, revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to respect resident rights by not allowing residents to go out and smoke during the designated times for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #3, Resident #12 and Resident #13). The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: 1. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) evaluation completed 5/5/26 at 4:31 PM revealed resident scored a 15 out of 15, which indicated cognition intact. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed Resident #12 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Care Plan revealed a focus area dated 5/5/26 for resident continued to enjoy smoking. Interventions dated 5/5/26, included: Instruct resident about the facility policy on smoking locations, times, and safety concerns and the resident requires supervision while smoking. During an interview on 5/12/26 at 9:45 AM, Resident #12 stated the facility allowed him to smoke three times a day except sometimes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow up after a report of food purchased by a resident was missing for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #12) reviewed for personal possessions. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: Review of the electronic health record (EHR) revealed Resident #12 admitted to the facility on [DATE].The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) completed 5/5/26, indicated intact cognition based on a score of 15 out of 15. During an interview on 5/12/26 at 9:50 AM, Resident #12 stated he bought some lunchables (a pre-packaged make it yourself meal kit) because he gets sick every time he eats. He explained he bought some lunchables because he doesn't eat dinner, and an employee needed them more than I did and he took them. Resident #12 stated he asked the CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) to go and get him one and they came back and said he didn't have any. Resident #12 stated he told a manager and they said they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently used and re-ordered the appropriate size bariatric incontinence brief for resident comfort, and to ensure a bathroom faucet and closet were accessible for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #18 and Resident #3) reviewed for accommodations. The facility reported a census of 57 residents.Findings included:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #18 dated 4/9/26, revealed an admission date of 10/8/25. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicated intact cognition. The list of diagnoses included morbid obesity, incontinence without sensory awareness and need for assistance with personal care. The MDS identified: the use of a wheelchair; the resident required substantial/maximum assistance with toileting hygiene and bed mobility; dependent for lower body dressing, transfers and moving from sitting to lying and standing; and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify a family of a missed medication in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #12) reviewed for family notification. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #12 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicated intact cognition. Review of a Orders Administration Note entered into the electronic health record (EHR) on 5/2/26 at 4:34 PM, revealed an order for: famotidine oral tablet 20 milligram (MG)- Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Comments: on orderReview of a Nurses Notes dated 5/7/26 at 1:10 PM, revealed PCP (Primary Care Provider), POA (Power of Attorney) notified and acknowledged missed dose of famotidine upon admission on [DATE] due to not having medication available. No issues…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 50 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to keep urinary catheter tubing and collection bags off of the floor in an effort to prevent an urinary tract infection for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #14) reviewed with a urinary catheter; and failed to start an antibiotic in a timely manner to treat an urinary tract infection for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for urinary tract infections. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings include:1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS indicated resident dependent with toileting hygiene and utilized a urinary catheter. The MDS revealed medical diagnoses for neurogenic bladder, type II diabetes mellitus, and a urinary tract infection (UTI) in the last 30 days. The Care Plan revealed a focus area dated 8/29/25 indicated resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff locked an unattended medication treatment cart for 1 of 2 observations for medication storage. The facility reported a census of 57 residents. Findings included:Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #22, dated 4/23/26, revealed a diagnosis of dementia; and Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. The resident utilized a walker to with supervision or touch assistance to ambulate. Review of the Care Plan for Resident #22, dated 2/19/26, revealed a Focus area to address elopement risk/wanderer related to the resident wandering aimlessly. On 5/12/26 at 3:18 PM, while on a walkthrough of the facility with the Maintenance Director, a 4 (four) drawer medication/treatment cart noted to be positioned across from the nurse's station by the medication room. The cart unattended by a facility staff and unlocked. Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) at the nurse's station not watching…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to serve a meal to meet the physician ordered dietary needs for 2 (Residents #9 and #16) out of 42 residents reviewed for diet orders during a breakfast service. The facility reported a census of 57.Findings included: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #9, dated 4/2/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses included hip fracture, left tibia (lower leg) fracture, other fractures, and anemia (low red blood cell count).Review of the Care Plan for Resident #9, dated 4/24/26, revealed a Focus area to address I am at nutritional risk due to hospitalization.MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment): 9/0 (4/2) At Risk for Malnutrition. Interventions initiated on 4/24/26 included:a. Diet: Consistent Carbohydrate with Double Protein portions to provide additional ~ 60 gms (grams) protein per [clinic name redacted].b. Meal Enrichments/Planned Snacks: Double protein at all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed enhanced barrier precautions to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms to residents during when personal care and wound care provided for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #18) reviewed for infection control. The facility reported a census of 57.Findings included:Review of Resident #18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], diagnoses listed included diabetes, incontinence without sensory awareness and morbid obesity. The assessment identified the resident had moisture associated skin damage (MASD). The MDS listed an admission date of 10/8/25. Review of electronic health record (EHR) revealed a Nurses Notes dated 10/8/25 which documented: 3 skin issues upon admit. All need the application of Triad cream (type of topical wound treatment) to areas: 1) left inner thigh shearing of skin from incontinent brief measures 2 cm (centimeters) L (length) x 1cm W…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that residents remained free from resident to resident altercations for 1 of 9 resident records reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 62 residents.Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident, dated 12/24/25 revealed (resident name redacted, Resident #1) was sitting in front of doorway to the nurses' station when (resident name redacted, Resident #2) was trying to pass by him. As Resident #2 passed by, Resident #1 swung back hitting her in the upper back twice. This was witnessed by Restorative Aide (name redacted, Staff A) and (name redacted, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN)). When altercation started, (name redacted, Staff A) tried to stop (name redacted, Resident #1) from hitting (name redacted, Resident #2) by holding arm, (name redacted, Resident #1) then hit (name redacted, Staff A) in the shoulder and grabbed at her abdomen pinching it and causing a bruise. Immediately separated, head to toe skin assessment and pain assessment completed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure that residents are free from financial exploitation for 1 of 9 residents (Resident #3) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 62 residents.Findings include: Review of Resident #3 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/11/25 revealed a diagnoses list that included adult failure to thrive, type 2 diabetes with unspecified complications, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites (fluid accumulation in the abdomen), anxiety, and depression. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 points indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #3 always able to make herself understood and always understood others. The MDS identified the resident totally dependent on staff for substantial assistance to reposition in bed, transfer to and from bed or chair, and unable to stand or ambulate. Review of a Facility Self-Reported Incident, dated 12/7/25, revealed When…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff, resident and family interviews, the facility failed to make an attempt to meet resident needs prior to issuing emergency discharges for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #5) reviewed. After a resident to resident altercation the facility issued emergency discharges to Resident #1 and Resident #5 upon their transfer to the hospital for an evaluation. The facility reported census was 57.Findings include: 1. According to a Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of July 17, 2025, Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 of 15, indicating an intact cognitive status. Resident #1 was coded independent to needing supervision assistance with transfers, mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Resident #1's diagnoses included coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation and was always continent of bladder and bowel.According to the facilities Notice of Resident Transfer or Discharge form dated Sept. 16, 2025, directed to Resident #1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare and handle food in a sanitary manner in an effort to prevent cross contamination and food borne illness during 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 7/28/25 at 1:15 PM, a metal basin observed to contain raw hamburger thawed on an upper shelf of rack. Meal trays with lidded plates rested on the shelf underneath. During an observation on 7/30/25 at 10:03 AM, bags of frozen chicken breasts in a stainless steel basin were placed on the second shelf of the refrigerator. Fruits in the plastic containers with plastic lids sat under the meat on the bottom shelf. Staff N, [NAME] noticed the meat on the second shelf and moved it to the bottom shelf. During an interview on 7/30/25 at 10:04 AM, Staff N, [NAME] stated she kept telling staff to put the meat on the bottom shelf so it didn't drip everywhere. During a continuous observation during the lunch meal service on 7/30/25 at 12:06 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and residents interviews, record review, and the facility policy, the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #11, Resident #21, and Resident #33) reviewed for dignity. The facility reported a census of 53 residents, Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 scored a 5 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition severely impaired. The MDS indicated the resident required supervision or touching assistance with eating. The MDS revealed medical diagnoses for stroke, aphasia following cerebral infarction. The Care Plan revealed a focus area revised on 6/25/25 for difficulty swallowing and pocketing food status post cerebral vascular accident. The intervention revised on 7/16/25 indicated distant supervision; Resident #11 will pocket solids and liquids, he is able to clear when allowed. Please do not instruct Resident #11 to swallow or prevent him from taking…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and the facility policy, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's weight loss for two different occurrences for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #7). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings Include: The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 scored a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed a loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in 6 months and on a therapeutic diet. The MDS revealed resident took an diuretic. The Care Plan revealed a Focus area revised on 8/6/25 for I am at nutritional risk s/p (status post) acute on chronic CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) with h/o (history) Type 2 DM (diabetes mellitus), COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), morbid obesity, gout, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, pneumonia.8/1/25- significant weight loss over 6 months. The Interventions dated 1/2/24 revealed meal enrichment/planned snacks: at least 1 cup…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to update Care Plans to reflect two residents had a significant weight loss and one resident no longer received dialysis services for 3 of 18 (Resident #7, Resident #11 and Resident #3) reviewed for Care Plans. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed a loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in 6 months and on a therapeutic diet. The MDS indicated Resident #7 took a diuretic (often called a water pill, a medication to help the body eliminate excess salt and water). Review of the Care Plan revealed a Focus area revised on 8/6/25 for I am at nutritional risk s/p (status post) acute on chronic CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) with h/o (history) Type 2 DM (diabetes mellitus), COPD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow speech therapy recommendations for eating assistance for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for following provider orders (Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 scored a 5 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition severely impaired. The MDS indicated the resident required supervision or touching assistance with eating. The MDS revealed medical diagnoses for stroke, aphasia following cerebral infarction. The MDS indicated resident not had a weight loss of 5% in one month or 10% in 6 months and not on a therapeutic diet. Review of the Care Plan revealed a Focus area revised on 6/25/25 for difficulty swallowing and pocketing food status post cerebral vascular accident. The Intervention revised on 7/16/25 indicated distant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide an intervention in a timely manner for a resident who complained of a rash and associated discomfort for 1 of 18 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for assessment and intervention. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS indicated resident required partial/moderate assistance with upper body dressing; and substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathing self. Review of the Care Plan revealed a Focus area revised on 7/29/25 for increased risk for impairment of skin integrity and potential pressure ulcer development related to fragile skin, history of pressure wounds and mobility impairment.The interventions dated 7/21/25 revealed avoid scratching and keep hands and body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement a restorative nursing program per guidance from therapy for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #25) reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. Per this assessment, the resident had no impairment to upper extremities, and had impairment to one side of lower extremities. During an interview on 7/29/25 at 9:33 AM, Resident #25 stated she had done restorative exercises one time. Review of the Care Plan last revised 7/18/25 revealed a Focus area to address Restorative Programming required to maintain current level of functional mobility (Ax2 with walker and gait belt for stand pivot transfers), to preserve joint integrity, preserve strength/ROM, and to prevent decline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent when three medication errors were observed from twenty-seven opportunities for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident #28, Resident #33, Resident #36). This deficient practice resulted in facility medication error rate of 11.11%. The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. Per this assessment, the resident took insulin for four of the last seven days. The Physician Order dated 7/1/25 revealed, Insulin Lispro Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 60 = 0 Units Follow Hypoglycemia Protocol; 61 - 140 = 0 Units; 141 - 180 = 1 Unit; 181 - 240 = 2 Units; 241 - 300 = 3 Units; 301 - 350 = 4 Units; 351 - 400 = 5 Units; 401+ = 0 Units Notify Physician for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Warfarin and Apixaban, anticoagulant medications, sliding scale insulin, and narcotic pain medication were administered per physician order for four of four residents reviewed for significant medication errors (Resident #20, Resident #36, Resident #55 and #62). The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. Per this assessment, the resident took anticoagulant medication. Review of Resident #20's Physician Order dated 6/13/25, discontinued on 6/17/25, revealed the following: Warfarin, also known as Coumadin) Sodium Oral Tablet 4 mg (milligram) with directions to give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day every Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday for anticoagulant therapy. Review of the resident's Medication Error Form…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments completed timely for 5 of 19 residents reviewed for completion of comprehensive assessments (Resident #9, Resident #18, Resident #26, Resident #29, and Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #18 revealed an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/25/24. The resident's MDS assessment completion date documented 5/20/24. 2. The Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #26 revealed an ARD of 8/9/24. The resident's MDS assessment was still in process. 3. The Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #29 revealed an ARD of 7/11/24. The resident's MDS assessment completion date documented 8/8/24. 4. The Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #34 revealed an ARD of 4/18/24. The resident's MDS assessment completion date documented 5/20/24. The Quarterly MDS assessment for Resident #34 revealed an ARD dated of 7/18/24. The resident's MDS assessment completion date documented 8/13/24. 5. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments completed timely for 2 of 19 residents reviewed for completion of comprehensive assessments (Resident #18, Resident #26). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: 1. The Annual MDS assessment for Resident #18 revealed an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/25/24. The resident's MDS assessment was currently still in process. 2. The Annual MDS assessment for Resident #26 revealed an ARD of 5/9/24. The resident's MDS assessment completion date documented 6/3/24. During an interview on 8/29/24 at 11:03 AM, Staff A, MDS Coordinator confirmed the MDS for Resident #18 and #26 were late and they needed to be completed within 14 days of the ARD date. During an interview on 8/29/24 at 12:38 PM, the DON (Director of Nursing) stated he expected the MDS to be completed on time. During an interview on 8/29/24 at 12:56 PM, the Administrator stated she expected the MDS be completed by the date they were due. The Facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the clinical record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to resubmit a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) with new mental health diagnoses and psychotropic medications added to the plan of care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR (Resident #20). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed diagnoses for anxiety disorder, depression, and psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia). The MDS revealed the resident took an antipsychotic and an antidepressants. The MDS revealed the resident took antipsychotics on a routine basis. The Notice of PASRR Level 1 Screen Outcome dated 5/24/17 revealed no Level II required unless a significant change. The PASRR revealed the diagnoses of unspecified psychiatric illness and no medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer a pneumococcal vaccine to 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pneumococcal vaccines (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 55 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed the resident received the Prevnar 13 vaccination on 5/16/19. The resident's file revealed a screen shot of immunization that the ARNP (Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner) reviewed the immunizations and noted resident received PCV 13 in 2019 and eligible for the PCV 20 dated 2/13/24. The Progress Notes dated 2/14/24 at 12:44 PM, revealed the Immunization Record sent to PCP (primary care provider) for review and returned that the resident was able to have the PCV20 (pneumococcal 20-valent conjugate) vaccine at this time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment free of hazards. Observations found resident rooms poorly cleaned, leaving debris and trash under beds for multiple days and hallways cluttered with equipment and wheelchairs. Findings include: During an observation on 6/4/24 at 4:30 p.m. debris (rubber glove) and trash were noticed under resident bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER] and a glove on the bathroom floor. During an observation on 6/5/24 at 11:00 a.m. and again at 2:50 p.m. the trash and glove remained under resident bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER], after housekeeping had been in the room to clean it that day. During an observation on 6/6/24 at 9:00 a.m. the glove and trash remained on the floor under the bed of room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an observation on 6/6/24 at 9:00 a.m. a gown and a deodorant container found on the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Later that morning the gown was picked up, but the deodorant container remained on the floor behind the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, infection control policy, clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to use enhanced barrier precautions and consistent hand hygiene practices between resident contact. The facility reported census was 48. Findings include: According to the Mnimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/26/24, Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #6 required moderate assistance with mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene needs. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, renal insufficiency, arthritis. Resident #6 has a catheter and is on enhanced barrier precautions. During an observation on 6/6/24 at 7:30 a.m. Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), and Staff F, CNA assisted Resident #6 with personal care. Neither Staff E or Staff F wore a protective gown. In an interview on 6/6/24 at 7:35 a.m. Staff E, Certified Nurse Aide,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy the facility failed to complete the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in a timely manner for 4 of 15 residents reviewed for quarterly MDS assessments (Resident #4, #22, #35, #46). The facility reported a census of 48. Findings include: 1. Resident #35 MDS quarterly assessment ARD (Assessment Reference Date)/Target Date dated 4/20/23 completed on 5/22/23 and accepted/locked on 4/11/23. 2. Resident #22 MDS quarterly assessment ARD/Target Date dated 7/1/23 and not completed until 7/16/23 and accepted/locked on 7/17/23. 3. Resident #46 MDS quarterly assessment ARD/Target Date dated 10/15/23 and not completed until 11/16/23 and accepted/locked on 11/16/23. During an interview on 11/30/23 at 12:05 PM, Staff L, MDS coordinator queried on who did the MDS assessments and she stated she did. Staff L informed the resident whose quarterly MDS assessments not completed timely and she stated she couldn't make excuses, it was black and white. She stated the old Director of Nursing (DON) left in the middle of September and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed rails, use of foot pedals during transport, and documentation of behaviors, anxiety, and major depressive disorder were addressed on the Care Plan for four of fifteen residents reviewed for Care Plans (Resident #7, Resident #11, Resident #22, Resident #30). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 11/9/23 revealed the resident scored 6 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam which indicated severely impaired cognition. Per the assessment, a bed rail was not used in bed for the resident. The Care Plan did not address use of bed rails for the resident. The Physician Order dated 6/11/21 documented, Halo/grab barsx2 for bed mobility and positioning. No directions specified for order. On 11/29/23 at 8:35 AM, observation of Resident #11 revealed the resident in her wheelchair in her room. Resident #11's bed observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to serve food that was warm and palatable for three of twenty four residents reviewed (Resident #23, Resident #30, Resident #103). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15 and had the following diagnoses: Heart Failure, Renal Insufficiency (Kidney Failure) and Diabetes Mellitus. The MDS also identified Resident #30 required substantial staff assistance with lower body dressing, putting on footwear. In an interview on 11/29/23 at 8:30 AM sitting up in wheelchair in her room, Resident #30 complained that the food is horrible. The pasta is always overcooked and food has no taste. Breakfast is always cold, especially the eggs. She reported she had spoken to many people about it, even the dietitian. On 8/31/20, the care plan identified Resident #30 with the problem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of two of three reviewed (Residents #3 and #7). The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings included: 1. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 as cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13. The MDS documented the resident had the following diagnoses; Atrial Fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm), Pneumonia and Arthritis. The MDS also identified Resident #3 required substantial assistance with oral hygiene, upper body dressing and totally dependent on staff for toileting, showering, lower body dressing, putting on foot wear and repositioning. The MDS also documented that Resident #3 had an indwelling catheter. Observations of Resident #3 revealed the urinary drainage bag was not placed in a dignity bag on 11/27/23 at the following times: At 10:35 AM observed the resident as follows; she sat up in her wheelchair in her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and the facility policy, the facility failed to have the call light within reach for a resident while in bed for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for call lights (Resident #35). The facility reported a census of 48. Findings include: The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 scored a 11 out of 15 on the Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented impairment on both sides of his lower extremities and the resident used a wheelchair. The MDS documented the medical diagnosis of Parkinsons, unspecified. The Care Plan revealed a focus area dated 11/18/21 of increased risk for actual/potential limitations in my ability to perform my ADL (Activities of Daily Living) related to generalized weakness and cognitive deficits. The interventions dated 1/24/22 directed staff to encourage the resident to use the bell to call for assistance. The Care Plan revealed a focus area initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0566 — isolated
    1) Protect residents from being forced to work at the nursing home, or 2) let residents work if they want to.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 00. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 and had the following diagnoses: Diabetes Disorder, Gastrostomy and Anxiety Disorder. It also identified Resident #7 required substantial assistance with showers/baths, dressing, putting on footwear and turning from side to side. It did not identify the resident with a feeding tube and identified she was on a therapeutic diet. Observations of the resident during the survey from 11/27/23 through 11/30/23 revealed the resident's bed with two ¼ side rails up. In an interview on 11/29/23 at 10:19 AM, Resident #7 reported she purchased her own bed as it had an air mattress and the side rails came with it, but none of the staff had provided any kind of education on safety issues on it. In an interview on 11/29/23 at 10:45 AM, the Director of Nursing reviewed the resident's Electronic Medical Record and verified there was no documentation of side rail evaluation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, and facility policy the facility failed to document the resident's Advance Directives for two of two residents reviewed (Residents #103 and #203). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings included: 1. At the time of the survey, the admission MDS for Resident #103 had not been completed. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) list of medical diagnoses included: cerebral infarction due to embolism, muscle weakness and multiple fractures of ribs on the left side. The admission Progress Note dated [DATE] at 5:10 PM revealed Resident #103 as alert and oriented to person, time and place. The admission Progress Note documented the resident had diagnoses which included weakness with falls, and would be on skilled level of care for therapy after discharge from a hospital. On [DATE], a review of the EMR revealed no documentation to address Resident #103's preference for Advance Directives (legal documents that provide instructions for medical care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician notification occurred for heart rate per parameters included the resident's Care Plan for one of one residents reviewed for physician notification (Resident #4). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4 dated 10/5/23 revealed the resident scored 13 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. The Care Plan dated 7/14/21 documented, The resident is on Digoxin Therapy r/t (related to) atrial fibrillation. The Intervention dated 7/14/21 documented, Report to physician if pulse falls below 60 or rises above 110 or if you detect skipped beats or other changes in rhythm. Review of documentation of the resident's pulse for October 2023 and November 2023 revealed the following dates, times, and documentation of heart rate less than 60. Documentation of the resident's heart rate on 10/1/23 and 10/2/23 revealed the following instances of heart rate less than 60: a. 10/1/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by cleaning and removing stains and dried food on a resident's recliner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for cleanliness of the building (Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 48. Findings include: The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed medical diagnoses of stroke and hemiplegia following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side. During an observation on 11/27/23 at 10:58 AM, Resident #22 right side seat cushion on the recliner dirty with dried food and stains on it. Incontinent pad on the recliner had a brown mark smeared on the end of it by the stains on the seat. During an interview on 11/27/23 at 10:58 AM, Resident #22 stated the staff spend about 10 minutes in his room to clean. He stated he ate in his chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents free from chemical restraints when narcotics pain medication was administered for management of resident's behavior for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #15). The facility reported a census of 48. Findings include: The MDS Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 scored a 2 out of 15 Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident was unable to answer presence of pain. The MDS indicated the resident received scheduled pain medications, and the resident received or was offered As Needed (PRN) pain medications, and the resident didn't receive non-medication intervention for pain. The MDS documented that the resident received antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, and an opioid class of medications that are considered high-risk drug classes. The Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the required documentation needed for transfers to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 48. Findings include: The MDS Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed medical diagnosis for anxiety disorder and depression. The Social Work Progress Note dated 4/3/23 at 1:21 PM revealed the staff reported Resident #22 make gestures with a gait belt, gestures of wrapping it around his neck and hanging himself. The Director of Nursing (DON) (put one on one in place immediately. Social Services had a conversation with Resident #22 about his gesture of hanging himself and he denied it. However with further conversation he stated that he cried all of the time and felt sad all the time. Social Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to consistently notify the ombudsman of a resident's transfer to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #22). The facility reported a census of 48. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated cognition intact. The MDS revealed medical diagnosis for anxiety disorder and depression. The Progress Note dated 10/8/23 at 2:30 PM, revealed at 2:15 PM reported resident found on the floor. On assessment resident complained of pain in lower back and tailbone area. When trying to get vitals and check Range of Motion (ROM) resident became combative with a history of doing so. Resident kicking walker and and hit staff. Let him know if he would not let us assess him, the hospital needed to check him out. Resident started hitting again. Called on call doctor. New order to send…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy the facility failed to complete the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within a timely manner for 3 of 15 residents reviewed for annual MDS assessments (Resident #15, #22, #35). The facility reported a census of 48. Findings include: Resident #35 MDS Annual assessment Assessment Reference Date (ARD)/Target Date dated 10/12/23 completed on 11/8/23 and accepted/locked on 5/22/23. Resident #22 MDS Annual assessment ARD/Target Date dated 9/21/23 and not completed until 10/17/23 and accepted/locked on 10/17/23. Resident #15 MDS Annual assessment ARD/Target Date dated 8/17/23 and not completed until 9/12/23 and accepted/locked on 9/12/23. During an interview on 11/30/23 at 12:05 PM, Staff L, MDS Coordinator queried on who did the MDS assessments and she stated she did. Staff L informed the resident whose annual MDS assessments not completed timely and she stated she couldn't make excuses, it was black and white. She stated the old Director of Nursing (DON) left in the middle of September and she was pulled to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure timely completion of a Significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of one resident reviewed for significant change assessments (Resident #14). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14 revealed the assessment reference date 8/25/23. The completion date for the assessment revealed 9/20/23. The Care Plan dated 10/13/23 documented, I am receiving Hospice Services through [Redacted] due to end stage dementia, Parkinson's disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and dysphagia. On 11/30/23 at 12:04 PM when queried as to the timeframe to complete significant change assessments, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator acknowledged 14 days from the date a significant change determined. The MDS Coordinator acknowledged she was behind, and was pulled to work the floor. The Facility Policy titled [Facility] Resident Assessments dated March 2022 documented, OBRA-Required Assessments - are federally mandated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clincial record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure accurate completion of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment to address use of bed rails, gastrostomy tube, and weight loss for two of fifteen residents reviewed for MDS accuracy (Resident #7, Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored 6 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam which indicated severely impaired cognition. Per the assessment, Resident #11 did not have a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in the last 6 months. Per the assessment, a bed rail was not used in bed. The Dietary Progress Note dated 11/2/23 at 7:51 PM documented, WT (weight) - 97#(11/2)[BMI (body mass index)= 20.3 .RD (Registered Dietician) notes significant weight loss (-)10.2% X 3 mos using wt of 108#(8/01) as comparison weight. On 11/29/23 at 8:35 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to address the problem of an open wound on the initial care plan for one of one residents admitted within the last 30 days. (Resident #103). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings included: 1. At the time of the survey, the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) had not been completed for Resident #103. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) list of medical diagnoses included: cerebral infarction due to embolism, muscle weakness and multiple fractures of ribs on the left side. In an observation and interview with the resident on 11/27/23 at 10:03 AM, the resident sat up in the recliner in his room with feet elevated, he reported he came in with an open area to the left shin which had kerlix dressing dated 11/25/23. He wore tubigrips to both legs which had with 2 pluse edema (swelling of tissue). A review of the Progress Note dated 11/22/23 at 5:10 PM revealed Resident #103 as alert and oriented to person, time and place. On 11/27/23, a review of the EMR revealed the only problem…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to update the Care Plans for two of fifteen residents reviewed after returning from the hospital (Residents #7 and #22). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 as cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 and had the following diagnoses: Diabetes Disorder, Gastrostomy and Anxiety Disorder. It also identified Resident #7 required substantial assistance with showers/baths, dressing, putting on footwear and turning from side to side. It did not identify the resident with a feeding tube and identified she was on a therapeutic diet. A review of the progress notes revealed the following: a. 7/22/23 at 1:50 AM Resident #7 complained of pain in her right upper quadrant rating it a 9 and states it feels like someone is punching her there. Also states she has been having this pain intermittently for about a week now. Bowels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders and administer blood pressure medications per accepted standard of practice for 3 of 15 residents reviewed (Residents #7, #11, and #30) The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 as cognitively intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 and had the following diagnoses: Diabetes Disorder, Gastrostomy and Anxiety Disorder. It also identified Resident #7 required substantial assistance with showers/baths, dressing, putting on footwear and turning from side to side. It did not identify the resident with a feeding tube and identified she was on a therapeutic diet. A review of the physician orders revealed the following: a. 5/12/23 G-Tube is to be clamped during meals and Med Pass and for 30 minutes after otherwise to vent at all times every shift for Gastric Outlet Obstruction. b. 5/17/23 Drain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure through assessment prior to a resident's hospitalization, failed to ensure throrough assessment post a documented episode of choking, and failed to ensure the dressing to a non-pressure skin wound changed as ordered for three of four residents reviewed for assessment/intervention (Resident #7, Resident #14, Resident #103). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14 dated 8/25/23 revealed the resident scored 3 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Health Status Note dated 10/17/23 at 8:59 AM documented, Resident AM BG (blood glucose) very low (57). He was assisted OOB (out of bed) and into dining room and given honey thickened chocolate milk and orange juice. Recheck 1 hour later was 135. While eating breakfast, resident choked on biscuits and gravy. Resident cyanotic but coughing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was able to access appropriate and timely vision care by an outside provider. The resident's vision had declined over the last nine months. (Resident #23) The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident # 23 dated 10/05/23 documented the resident scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Care Plan for Resident #23 dated 04/06/2020 and revised on 07/19/2020 with a Target date of 01/10/2024 documented the following focus area, goals and interventions: Focus area: My visual ability needs and preferences are: I wear eyeglasses. Date Initiated: 04/06/2020 Revision on: 04/06/2020 Goal: I will use appropriate visual devices to promote participation in ADLs and other activities. Date Initiated: 4/06/2020 Revision on: 07/19/2022 Target Date: 01/10/2024 Interventions: a. I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate falls, determine root cause analysis, and ensure pre-existing interventions were implemented for fall prevention, and failed to ensure foot pedals utilized when a resident pushed in their wheelchair for two of five residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #11, Resident #30). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 8/19/23 revealed the resident scored 6 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Per the assessment, Resident #11 did not have any falls since admission, entry, reentry, or the prior assessment. The Care Plan dated 7/8/21, revised 7/13/21, documented, the resident is at risk for falls related to generalized weakness, impaired cognition, and impulsivity. The Intervention dated 3/2/23 documented, Resident to have gripper socks on at bedtime. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent completion of assessments prior to dialysis for one of one resident reviewed for dialysis (Resident #37). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #37 revealed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. Per the assessment, the resident received dialysis while a resident. The Care Plan dated 8/3/22 documented, I have alteration of my renal function and require DIALYSIS d/t (due to) End Stage Renal Disease. I refuse to be weighed at the facility. The Intervention dated 8/3/22 documented, The facility will assist me, as needed, to coordinate services and care with my dialysis clinic. Communication with the dialysis center will be done pre/post each visit using a communication sheet or via phone and documented. Review of the resident's COMS-Pre/Post Dialysis Evaluation revealed only one evaluation had been completed for the resident on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consent completed for use of side rails and ensure assessments completed for use of side rails for two of two residents reviewed for side rails (Resident #7, Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #11 dated 11/9/23 revealed the resident scored 6 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam which indicated severely impaired cognition. Per the assessment, a bed rail was not used in bed for the resident. The Care Plan did not address use of bed rails for the resident. The Physician Order dated 6/11/21 documented, Halo/grab barsx2 for bed mobility and positioning. No directions specified for order. On 11/29/23 at 8:35 AM, observation of Resident #11 revealed the resident in her wheelchair in her room. Resident #11's bed observed to have partial rails bilaterally on the resident's bed, with one rail up and one rail…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately document receipt of hospice services and completion of a wound treatment for two of two residents reviewed for records (Resident #18, Resident #103). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #18 dated 9/16/23, completed 9/22/23, revealed the resident scored 15 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam. Per the assessment, Resident #18 did not receive hospice care while a resident. The Care Plan revised 11/16/23 documented, I am at nutritional risk due to h/o (history of) ETOH (alcohol) dependence, cardiomyopathy, cirrhosis and weight loss hx (history). I have been admitted to Hospice in October 2022 and Decertified in [DATE]. Resident to be certified for Hospice Care end of June/Early July 2023. As of October 2023 resident remains decertified from Hospice. The Health Status Note dated 9/18/23 at 8:22 AM documented, Resident discharged from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control techniques for one of three residents observed during medication pass (Resident #6), during the drainage of a GT (gastric tube) drainage bag for one of one residents observed with a GT drainage bag (Resident #7) and during wound care for one of one residents observed (Resident #103). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings included: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 as cognitively intact with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 and had the following diagnoses: Atrial Fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm), Coronary Artery Disease, Parkinson's Disease and Anxiety Disorder. The MDS also identified Resident #6 as independent with most activities of daily living. During observation of med pass for Resident #6 on 11/28/23 at 6:35 AM, Staff B, RN removed one tablet of Alprazolam 1 mg from blisterpack, the pill fell out on top of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Immunization Registry Information System (IRIS) review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccines offered timely for two of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #4, Resident #11). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4 dated 10/5/23 revealed the resident scored 13 out of 15 on a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam, which indicated intact cognition. Review of Resident #4's electronic health record revealed the resident was born in 1932. Review of IRIS documentation for the resident revealed the resident received PCV-13 (Pnuemococcal Polysacharide) on 11/17/16. IRIS documentation of immunizations lacked additional pneumococcal vaccination administration. Review of a paper Vaccination History document provided by the facility revealed the resident last had PPSV-23 (Pneumococcal Polysaccharide) on 10/24/02. The webpage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Information Registry Information System (IRIS) review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered COVID-19 vaccination(s) timely for one of five residents reviewed for immunizations (Resident #18). The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Findings include: Review of census information for Resident #18 revealed the resident admitted to the facility 8/17/22. Review of IRIS documentation for the resident revealed the resident received one dose of a two dose series for COVID-19 vaccination on 8/17/22. The resident had another COVID-19 vaccine which could be given 9/7/22 per the earliest date per IRIS, 9/7/22 per the recommended IRIS information, and considered past due 9/28/22 per IRIS. Review of the resident's Vaccination History per a paper form provided by the facility revealed dose 1 of a 2 dose series given 8/17/22. Review of the Immunization Consent/Declination Form revealed consent for COVID-19 dated 11/15/23. On 12/4/23 at 4:38 PM, the Administrator explained via email the facility did not have further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-05-19 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy, the facility failed to thorough document transfers to the hospital (Resident #2 and Resident #13); failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative a transfer notice, in writing, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #1, Resident #11). The transfer notice also failed to include the resident appeal rights, the Ombudsman contact information, and the contact information for those agencies responsible for the protection of residents with intellectual, developmental, mental and related disabilities. This failure impacted all residents transferred to the hospital. The facility failed to notify the Ombudsman after resident sent to the hospital (Resident #10) for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for transfers. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 scored a 9 out 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, which indicated a moderate cognitive impairment. The list of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AZRIA HEALTH — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BCP IOWA OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 09/17/2019
KAMINER, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER100%since 09/17/2019
OXFORD FINANCE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 09/17/2019
BAUDER, PEARLIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 09/17/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$690K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 14%Other / private 33%

This home reported $690K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,050per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$331per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165220. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next