Azria Health Olathe
201 E Flaming Road, Olathe, KS 66061 · For profit - Corporation · 125 certified beds · (913) 829-2273 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $54,031 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-10)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.3% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.0% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.3% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.7% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.1% | 4.3% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 31.0% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.1% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.8% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 4.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.1% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.5% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 29.5% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.0% | 22.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.3% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.82 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.40 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.1–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 55.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.7%CMS range 3.4–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.87 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 115.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 4 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with three reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from sexual abuse when cognitively impaired Resident (R) 16, a resident with a history of inappropriate touching, touched R75's genital area against R75's wishes. On 07/18/25, R16 touched a lady in a sexual way, and the facility sent R16 to the hospital for inappropriate behavior. R16 returned to the facility on [DATE], but the facility did not implement interventions to address R16's inappropriate touching. On 08/28/25, R16 exhibited sexual behaviors towards staff, but the facility did not address these behaviors with new interventions. On 08/29/25, R16 touched cognitively impaired R75, a resident unable to consent, in her genital area. R75 screamed at R16 to stop touching her. Staff separated R16 and R75 and placed R16 under one-to-one staff supervision until R16 transferred to an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents; five residents were reviewed for dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) care. Eighteen residents resided on the memory care unit. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services for Resident (R) 248 when the facility failed to identify and implement resident-centered interventions to address violent/aggressive behaviors, wandering, and negative resident-to-resident altercations which included physical aggression. The facility further failed to assess, identify, record, and respond to R248's specific behaviors, triggers, and past/present interests and activities in order to promote an environment which supported R248's individualized care needs. As a result of these failures, R248, who was allowed to roam freely on the memory care unit, was involved in multiple resident-to-resident altercations which created an unsafe living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with five medication carts and three medication rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an accurate reconciliation of controlled drugs at the end of daily work shifts and maintain the staff count sheets for the controlled drugs. This placed residents at risk for misappropriation of medications and/or diversion of controlled substances. Findings included:- On 09/09/25 at 07:30 AM, a review of the September 2025 Narcotic Shift Count Sheet on the 200 hall from 09/01/25 to 09/09/25 (nine days) revealed a missing signature either for the on-coming nurse or the off-going nurse on the following dates: 09/01/25, 09/02/25, 09/03/25, 09/04/25, 09/05/25, 09/06/25, 09/07/25, 09/08/25, and 09/09/25. On 09/09/25 at 07:33 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) K stated that each shift should count the narcotics at shift change with the oncoming nurse and the off-going nurse. LN K stated it was the expectation of the facility that reconciliation of the narcotics was expected when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 107 residents, with one kitchen and two dining rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to storage, preparation, and meal service. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings Included: - On 09/08/25 at 07:05 AM, a walkthrough of the facility's kitchen was completed. An inspection of the main kitchen area revealed:The floor was heavily dirty with old food debris and trash in the food prep and stove area. A soiled towel was on the floor next to the stove top ovens. Dessert saucers and plates were stored upwards in the dishware storage rack. An inspection of the dry food storage area revealed dirty floors and a soiled Band-Aid in the center of the dry food storage room floor. A dented 6.56-pound (lb.) can of fruit cocktail was on the canned storage rack. An inspection of the walk-in refrigerator revealed a metal tray of five packaged turkey cold cut meat underneath the walk-in refrigerator's air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-10 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 107 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were sampled for required in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure five of the five CNA staff reviewed had the required 12 hours of in-service education. This placed the residents at risk for decreased quality of life and/or inadequate care. Findings included:- Review of the information facility's in-service records revealed the following CNAs were employed with the facility for more than 12 months: CNA MM, hired on 06/26/24, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA NN, hired on 09/29/24, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA OO, hired on 09/22/22, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA PP, hired on 11/22/23, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. CNA QQ, hired on 10/25/23, had not completed the required in-services in the past 12 months. On 09/10/25 at 12:30 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O stated the facility did have monthly meetings. CNA O…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with four reviewed for accommodation of needs for assistive device. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to utilize foot pedals during wheelchair transports for Resident (R) 37, R43, R104, and R122. This placed the residents at risk for preventable accidents. Findings Included: - On 09/09/25 at 07:40 AM, R37 (a severely cognitively impaired resident on the secured unit) was wheeled from her room to the dining room table. R37's wheelchair lacked foot pedals, and her feet slid on the ground as she was pushed. On 09/09/25 at 07:50 AM, R43 (a severely cognitively impaired resident on the secured unit) was wheeled to the dining room area from her room. Her wheelchair lacked foot pedals, and her feet slid on the floor as she was pushed.On 09/09/25 at 08:42 AM, R104 (a severely cognitively impaired resident on the secured unit) was pushed from the hallway to the dining room table. R104's wheelchair lacked foot pedals. Her feet touched the floor as she was pushed to the table. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents. The facility had one oxygen storage room on the 100 hall and one oxygen storage room on the 200 hall. The facility had a total of six cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents who resided on either the 100 or the 200 hall. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tanks were stored in a securely locked room. The facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 28's nothing by mouth (NPO) physician's order was followed. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of possible avoidable injury.Findings included:- On 09/08/25 at 07:14 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, the oxygen storage room on 200 hall was unlocked with 21 unused full oxygen cylinders present. On 09/08/25 at 07:15 AM, the oxygen storage room on the 100 hallway was unsecured with 32 Oxygen E-tanks stored in the room. On 09/08/25 at 09:01 AM, a return to the 200-hall oxygen storage room continued to be unlocked. On 09/08/25 at 07:18 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The facility had three medication rooms and five medication carts. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication cart was kept locked and secured with cognitively impaired and independently mobile residents on the hall. This placed the residents at risk of accidental ingestion of medication and adverse reactions.Findings included:- On 09/08/25 at 07:14 AM, the nurse's medication cart on the 200 hall was left unlocked and unattended by staff. The medication cart contained two insulin pens and two vials of insulin.On 09/08/25 at 07:18 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated that she had stepped away from the cart briefly to assist another nurse, but the cart should always be locked when she was away from it. On 09/10/25 at 01:22 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that the medication carts should not ever be left unlocked when staff are away from the cart. The facility's Security of Medication Cart policy, dated January 2023, documented that the medication cart shall be secured during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with five reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified care environment for Residents (R) 43 and R20. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for impaired dignity and unmet care needs.Findings Included:- The Medical Diagnosis section within R43's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), muscle weakness, repeated falls, and the need for assistance with personal care. R43's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 07/01/25 indicated a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS noted no upper or lower extremity impairments. The MDS noted she used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS noted she required substantial to maximal assistance for her activities of daily living (ADL) and supervision during meals. The MDS noted no weight loss. R43's Cognitive Loss Care Area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with two sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization and one resident reviewed for discharge. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 1 and their representative were provided, as soon as practicable, a written notification of transfer upon their transfer to the hospital. The facility failed to ensure a discharge summary, and a recapitulation of R120's stay was completed upon discharge from the facility. This placed R1 and R120 at risk of miscommunication between the facility and the resident's representative, and the possible missed opportunity for healthcare services.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with 26 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan for Resident (R) 121 to include her chronic pain. This deficient practice placed R121 at risk of impaired care related to uncommunicated care needs.Findings included:- R121's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of Guillain-Barre syndrome (a disorder in which the body's immune system attacks the nerves), fractured toe, fibromyalgia (condition of musculoskeletal pain, spasms, stiffness, fatigue, and severe sleep disturbance), and diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) was in progress. R121's Care Area Assessment (CAA) was in progress. R121's Baseline Care Plan dated 09/05/25 documented nursing staff would administer all medication as ordered by the physician. The care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with four residents reviewed for treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 14's low air loss mattress was at the correct weight setting, and R48's offloading boots were applied to her heels to prevent pressure ulcers. This placed R14 and R48 at increased risk for developing pressure ulcers.Findings Included:- R14's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk), hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure), neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (the muscles that control the flow of urine out of the body do not relax and prevent the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents with one resident was reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 44 was provided services and treatment to prevent worsening of contractures (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint or muscle) in his left hand. This deficient practice placed R44 at risk for discomfort and decreased range of motion (ROM - the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Findings included:- R44's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of contracture of the left elbow, contracture of the left hand, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), cerebrovascular accident (CVA- stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), and dementia (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 24's dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) physician order was in his orders of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR). The facility failed to ensure R24's care plan provided interventions to direct staff and implement care and services according to the professional standards of practice in order to meet the resident's dialysis care needs. This deficient practice placed R24 at risk for missed dialysis visits and complications related to dialysis.Findings included:- R24's EMR documented diagnoses of osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow), end-stage renal disease (ESRD- a terminal disease of the kidneys), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with three residents reviewed for trauma-informed care (treatment or care directed to prevent re-experiencing or reducing the effects of traumatic events). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to assess and identify trauma-based triggers related to R11's post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- a mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress). The facility failed to implement individualized interventions to prevent re-traumatization to R11. These deficient practices placed R11 at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being and ineffective treatment. Findings included:- R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of PTSD, congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that causes people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), and hydronephrosis (a condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with two reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide consistent dementia-related behavioral interventions for Resident (R) 16 to promote the resident's highest practicable level of well-being. This deficient practice placed R16 at risk for decreased quality of life, isolation, and impaired dignity.Findings Included:- The Medical Diagnosis section within R16's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), muscle weakness, repeated falls, and the need for assistance with personal care. R16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 08/02/25 indicated a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three (severe cognitive impairment). The MDS noted no upper or lower extremity impairments. The MDS noted he used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS noted he had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 25's insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) was given before meals according to the physician-ordered parameters related to blood glucose monitoring. This deficient practice placed R25 at risk for hypoglycemia (less than normal amount of sugar in the blood), delayed treatment, and unnecessary medication complications. Findings included:- R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses hypertension (HTN high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), fracture of shaft of left tibia (the inner and typically larger of the two bones between the knee and the ankle), quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 107 residents. The sample included 26 residents, with two residents reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Residents (R) 4 and R5. This placed the resident at risk for inadequate end-of-life care. Finding Included:- R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN- elevated blood pressure), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents. The sample included 22 residents with six residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dignified care environment for Resident (R)33, R62, R75, R88, and R89. The facility additionally failed to provide dignity while dining when the facility used disposable silverware and dishware during meals. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of unnecessary embarrassment and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - The Facility Reported Incident 2181 documented that on 08/13/23, R33 assisted emergency medical services (EMS) by holding open a door so EMS could enter the facility. The report indicated Administrative Staff B approached R33 and told R33 to move out of the way. The report indicated R33 refused to move, and Administrative Staff B used profanity towards R33. On 01/17/24 at 08:05 AM an inspection of the main dining area revealed residents ate breakfast with Styrofoam plates/cups and disposable plastic silverware. At 08:05 AM Dietary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents with six residents on puree textured diets. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow nutritionally approved recipes during the preparation of the facility's pureed meals. This deficient practice placed six residents at risk for complications related to nutritional impairment. Findings Included- - On 01/22/23 at 10:15 AM Dietary Staff BB placed a tin of cooked beef and another of beef stock in the preparation area. The food processor machine had previously been used for food and had not been washed before puree use. Dietary Staff BB placed the contents of the cooked beef in the food processor and started to puree the meat. Dietary Staff BB then added beef stock to the processor without measuring to amount of liquid stock to be added. Dietary Staff then prepared a tin serving pan with non-stick spray and removed the textured mixer from the processor to the serving tray. An inspection of the mixer revealed a wet pudding-like consistency for the prepared meat. Dietary Staff BB did not review the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents with 22 residents included in the sample. The facility identified two residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to issue CMS (Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notification (SNF ABN) form 10055 (the form used to notify Medicare A participants of potential financial liability when a Medicare Part A episode ends) with the required information for Resident (R) 81 and R 28. This failure placed the residents at risk for impaired decision-making. Findings included: - A review of R81's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that the Medicare Part A episode began on 08/17/23 and ended on 08/21/23. R81 remained in the facility for custodial care. The facility-issued SNF ABN 10055 lacked an estimated cost for continued services. A review of R28's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that the Medicare Part A episode began on 07/12/23 and ended on 09/01/23. R28 remained in the facility for custodial care. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff secured and protected the privacy and confidentiality of Resident (R) 47's medical record. This placed this resident's personal and confidential information at risk of being accessed by unauthorized individuals. Findings included: - Observation on 01/18/24 at 12:14 PM R47's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was left open, visible, and unattended on the medication cart outside of his room. On 01/18/24 at 12:16 PM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R stated it was his mistake, he walked away from his medication cart and left the screen unlocked with R47's information visible. CMA R stated normally he locked the laptop screen every time he walked away from the cart. On 01/18/24 at 03:09 PM Licensed Nurse (LN) H stated the laptop screen should be locked every time the medication aide or nurse walked away from the laptop area. On 01/23/24 at 01:00 PM Administrative Nurse D stated he expected nursing staff to lock…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents. The sample included 22 residents with three reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to identify a preventable accident for Resident (R) 18, who was dependent on staff for transfers with a Hoyer (full body mechanical lift), as an allegation of potential neglect and failed to report to the State Agency (SA) as required within the required timeframe. This placed the resident at risk for unidentified and ongoing neglect. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R18 documented a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (a progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (a disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow that can be either structural or functional and allows urine to flow back into the kidneys). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 07/21/23, documented a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notification as soon as practicable to Resident (R) 58. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and the resident. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R58 documented diagnosis of quadriplegia (inability to move the arms, legs, and trunk of the body below the level of an associated injury to the spinal cord), and neuralgia (intense pain along a nerve). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 11/30/23 documented R58 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R58 had impairment on both sides of his body and was dependent on staff for all functional activities. The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 12/07/23 documented R58 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) care needs including eating, oral and personal hygiene, toileting, and mobility issues. R58's Psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 102 residents. The sample included 22 residents with three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance to Resident (R)62 for eating and drinking. These deficient practices placed R62 at risk of increased complications due to impaired ADL ability. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R62's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin or the body cannot respond to the insulin). R62's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 01/03/24 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero indicating severe cognitive impairment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 102 residents. The sample included 22 residents with one resident reviewed for hydration. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for daily weights to monitor for fluid overload for Resident (R) 38. This deficient practice placed R38 at risk for delay in treatment related to fluid overload and untreated illness. Findings included: - R38's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), and paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R38 was dependent on staff assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility documented a census of 102 residents. The sample included 22 residents, with 10 reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from preventable accidents when staff failed to correctly place the loop of the sling during a Hoyer lift (total body mechanical lift used to transfer residents) transfer which resulted in resident (R)18's fall to the floor from the lift. The facility further failed to ensure Dycem (non-slip mat used for stabilization and gripping to prevent slipping) was placed correctly in R75's wheelchair. These deficient practices placed R18 and R75 at risk for avoidable injuries. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R18 documented a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (a progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (a disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow that can be either structural or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents. The sample included 22 residents with four reviewed for catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) care. Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 18's catheter bag (urine collection bag) was kept below his bladder during a Hoyer (full body mechanical lift) transfer. This deficient practice placed R18 at increased risk for infection and other catheter-associated complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R18 documented a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (a progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (a disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstructed urinary flow that can be either structural or functional and allows urine to flow back into the kidneys). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 07/21/23, documented a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents. The sample included 22 with three reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care. Based on interviews, record review, and observations, the facility failed to provide appropriate dementia care and services to address Resident (R)60's wandering behavior. This deficient practice placed R60 at risk for decreased quality of life due to the inability to maintain her highest practicable level of functioning. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R60's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), insomnia, cognitive-communication disorder, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). R60's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 10/09/23 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated no wandering behaviors. R60's Cognitive Loss Care Area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents with one kitchen and two dining areas. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary dietary standards related to food preparation, service, and storage. The facility additionally failed to ensure sanitary cleaning of kitchen service areas and equipment. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk related to food-borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Finding Included: - On 01/17/24 at 08:03 AM an inspection of the facility's kitchen was completed. An inspection of the microwave oven revealed dried food residue on the top and back walls of the inside of the microwave. The kitchen's deep fryer contained dark brownish oil covered with old food debris all over the inside and outside the frying unit. A five-gallon bucket filled with used oil and old food debris under the kitchen's convection oven. An inspection of the kitchen's clean equipment storage area revealed saucers and water pitchers stored upward and uncovered on the rack. An inspection of the kitchen's reach-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 102 residents. The sample included 22 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed appropriate infection control practices and procedures when Resident (R)88's oxygen tubing and nasal cannula (a hollow tube used to deliver supplemental oxygen) were left on the floor. The facility further failed to ensure nursing staff appropriately sanitized a community-used Hoyer (total body mechanical lift) after each use. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to infectious diseases. Findings included: - On 01/17/24 at 08:49 AM R88's portable oxygen tank was on the back of her wheelchair and the oxygen tubing and nasal cannula attached to the tank laid on the floor in R88's room, no bag was noted. 01/17/24 11:39 AM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) P and Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R did not clean/sanitize the Hoyer lift after use in R51's room and CNA P then wheeled the lift into R63's room. On 01/23/24 at 11:55 AM CNA M stated lifts should be cleaned after each use and/or before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The facility had one main kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that food items were properly stored in a safe and sanitary manner after the original sealed package had been opened and the food item was not placed in a sealed container/storage bag with the proper labeling and date. The facility further failed to ensure prepared pitchers of drinks were labeled and dated. This deficient practice had the potential for food borne illnesses for residents. Findings included: - The initial tour of the facility kitchen on 05/09/22 at 07:35 AM revealed the following: in dry storage area there was a bag of white cake mix that was opened and wrapped in cellophane wrap that was not labeled or dated. In the refrigerator there was a small bowl of potato salad that was uncovered, not labeled and not dated. There were seven prepared pitchers of various drinks that were not labeled or dated. The walk-in refrigerator had three trays of baked pies that were not covered, not labeled, and not dated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident (R) 31's Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA- legal document that names a person to make healthcare decisions when the resident was no longer able to) when R31 was transferred to the hospital for change in mental status. This deficient practice had the risk for miscommunication between R31, their DPOA, and the facility. Findings included: - R31 admitted to facility on 09/16/21 and transferred to hospital on [DATE]. The Diagnoses tab of R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented heart failure (a progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles. This causes fatigue, shortness of breath), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function), cerebral infarction (cerebrovascular accident [CVA]- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide form CMS 10123, Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC- a notice that indicated when the resident's care was set to end from skilled nursing facility [SNF]). It includes information for how to appeal the provider 's decision to a Quality Improvement Organization for Resident's (R) 66, R56, and R71. This deficient practice placed three residents at risk for uninformed decisions. Findings included: - The Medicare NOMNC form informed the beneficiaries that are receiving skilled therapy that are eligible for expedited determination process, even if they agree with the termination of the services. The NOMNC has a section for information related to their right to appeal the decision. The facility lacked documentation staff provided R66 or their representative the NOMNC form 10123 when the resident's skilled services ended 02/27/22. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents; two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notification of transfers to Resident (R) 63 or to her family/durable power of attorney (DPOA- legal document that named a person to make healthcare decisions when the resident was no longer able to) in a practicable amount of time. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunity for healthcare services. Findings included: - R63 admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to hospital on [DATE], readmitted to facility on 01/19/22, discharged to hospital 02/09/22, readmitted to facility on 02/14/22, discharged to hospital 03/28/22, and readmitted to facility 04/01/22. The Diagnoses tab of R63's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of personal history of pulmonary embolism (a condition in which one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessment and documentation on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for documentation of anticoagulant (medication used to prevent blood from thickening or clotting) use for Resident (R) 2, R76, and R94. This deficient practice had the risk for miscommunication related to anticoagulation status. Findings included: - The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/28/22, documented R2 received anticoagulant medications seven days in the seven-day lookback period. The Orders tab of R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented an order with a start date of 11/08/21 for clopidogrel bisulfate (antiplatelet medications- works by preventing platelets [a type of blood cell] from collecting and forming clots that may cause a heart attack or stroke) 75 milligrams (mg) one time a day related to cerebral infarction (cerebrovascular accident [CVA]- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five reviewed for care plan revisions. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to remove an discontinued or unnecessary intervention on R39's care plan. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for ineffective or unnecessary treatments. Findings Included- -The electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the following diagnosis for R39: cerebral infarction (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), left hand contracture (abnormal permanent fixation of a joint), muscle spasms, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), and chronic pain. A review of R39's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 03/25/2022 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing opportunities for Residents (R) 298. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective skin care and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: -The electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the following diagnosis for R298: chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes(when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), overactive bladder, insomnia (inability to sleep), retention of urine, muscle weakness, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), obstructive sleep apnea (disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents, with five residents reviewed for activities. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to consistently provide activities for Resident (R)52. This deficient practice had the risk for a decline in physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and independence. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R52 recorded diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), Parkinson's Disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R52 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three which indicated a severely impaired cognition. R52 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five reviewed for incontinence care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement incontinence care interventions for Residents (R) 28, R86 and R298. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to incontinence. Findings Included: -The electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the following diagnosis for R28: chronic pain, peripheral vascular disease (abnormal condition affecting the blood vessels), hypertension (high blood pressure), osteoarthrosis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), bipolar disorder, vascular dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0696 — isolatedProvide appropriate care/assistance for a resident with a prosthesis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and assistance, consistent with professional standards of practice, for Resident (R)13's prosthesis, related to his preference to wear his prosthetic device and his goal to return home. This deficient practice placed R13 at risk for impaired dignity and loss of independence. Findings included: - R13's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of absence of left leg below the knee, diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD-abnormal condition affecting the blood vessels). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R13 required extensive assistance of one staff member for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents with one reviewed for pain. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide non-pharmacological pain interventions for Residents (R) 298. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective pain management and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: -The electronic medical record (EMR) indicated the following diagnosis for R298: chronic pain, chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes(when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), heart failure, hypertension (high blood pressure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), overactive bladder, insomnia (inability to sleep), retention of urine, muscle weakness, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), obstructive sleep apnea (disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), and need for assistance with personal cares. A review of R298's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents, with one resident reviewed for hemodialysis (procedure using a machine to remove excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to document arteriovenous (AV-a surgically created connection between artery and a vein used for hemodialysis) fistula for thrill (palpable vibration) and bruit (an audible vascular sound associated with turbulent blood flow usually heard with stethoscope that may occasionally also be palpated as a thrill) every day for Resident (R) 71. This deficient practice placed R71 at risk of potential adverse outcomes and physical complications related to dialysis. Findings included: - R71's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of end stage renal (kidney) disease (a terminal disease because of irreversible damage to vital tissues…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities for Resident R36's hypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat hypertension [high blood pressure]) given outside the physician ordered parameters, and for irregularities related to bowel movement monitoring for R81. This deficient practice which had the potential of unnecessary medication administration thus leading to possible harmful side effects. Findings included: - R36's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of six which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 99 residents. The sample included 23 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)36's hypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat hypertension [high blood pressure]) were administered as ordered by the physician, and failed to ensure bowel monitoring for R81. This deficient practice had the potential of unnecessary medication administration thus leading to possible harmful side effects. Findings included: - R36's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and hypertension. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of six which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R36 was dependent of two staff members assistance for activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$54,031 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-09-10
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-09-10
- $22,617 — penalty dated 2024-02-06
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-24 for 24 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AZRIA HEALTH — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZRIA OLATHE EQUITY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 08/24/2018 |
| BCP IOWA OPCO HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2021 |
| HORNUNG, STEVEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2021 |
| KAMINER, AARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2021 |
| RIANO-MCCOLLOM, ERIKA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175557. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.