Jackson Ridge Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 62.4 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that records including dishwashing, refrigerator, and food temperatures logs were consistently documented, completed, and monitored. The facility reported a census of 58 residents.Findings include: On 5/28/26 at 1:00 PM, observation revealed that the facility lacked documentation of appropriate sanitizing of the dishwashing machine, and food and refrigerator temperature logs. Review of the Dishwashing Record, Low-Temperature/Chemical Log for May 2026 indicated staff were instructed to report in parts per million (ppm) is less than (space left blank) ppm. Report if temperature is less than (space left blank) Fahrenheit. The following dates failed to have any temperature or chemical sanitization ppm documented:a. All three meals on: 5/2/26, 5/3/26, 5/11/26, 5/17/26, 5/22/26, 5/25/26, 5/29/26, 5/30/26, 5/31/26.b. Lunch and Dinner meals on: 5/10/26, 5/16/26, 5/24/26, and 5/28/26.c. Dinner meals on: 5/1/26, 5/4/26-5/9/26, 5/13/26-5/15/26, 5/18/26-5/20/26, 5/26/26-5/27/26.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide professional standards of quality by not following physician orders for blood sugars to be completed upon admit for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 58 residents.Findings include:Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. Resident #2 was able to be understood and understood others, and had no behaviors. Per the MDS, the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a short term general hospital. The resident required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting, transfers, dressing, and personal hygiene. The MDS included diagnoses of heart failure, diabetes mellitus, non-Alzheimer's dementia, and depression. The Care Plan initiated 7/29/25 indicated Resident #2 had diabetes mellitus that was managed with diet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, document review, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to serve the Dietician approved menu for 5 of 5 residents receiving a pureed diet. (Residents #1, #8, #19, #43, #46). The facility identified a census of 59 residents. Findings include: An untitled document provided by the facility on 6/23/25 documented Residents #1, #8, #19, #43, and #46 on pureed diets. A 6/24/25 Week Two Dietician approved Menu for Tuesday documented the following puree menu: a. Beef cube pepper steak, 1 serving (4 ounces (Oz.) b. French onion rice, 1 serving (4 Oz) c. Buttered peas, #12 scoop d. Seasonal fresh fruit, 1 serving Observation on 6/24/25 at 10:42 AM Staff A, [NAME] reported the facility had five residents on pureed diets and she planned to puree five servings of each item. Staff A placed five, 4 Oz. servings of peas into the Avamix blender, adding 1 ¼ cups milk to blend the mixture. She poured the mixture into a large measuring cup and reported the total volume…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to minimize the risk of foodborne pathogens by storing dishes wet; failed to cover food during transport, and failed to maintain proper food temperatures. The facility identified a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Observation on 6/24/25 at 11:08 AM revealed Staff C, Dietary Aide (DA) continually taking wet dishes from the dish rack and placing back in storage. Finally, Staff C removed a glass 8-cup measuring cup and two white spatulas from a dish rack on the clean side of the dishwasher. Staff C hung the measuring cup and two spatulas above the preparation table where Staff A, [NAME] prepared the puree food items for the noon meal. The 8-cup measuring cup observed with water droplets all along the top rim of the cup and the two spatulas had water droplets on the backside of the spatulas which hung touching each other on the rack. Observation on 6/24/25 at 12:44 PM Staff B pushed a cart with Resident #10 and #17 room trays out of the kitchen and down the hallway without covering the fruit bowls.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, document review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) process to address a previously identified quality deficiency, resulting in a repeated deficiency identified on two consecutive recertification surveys within 10 months. The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Findings include: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) 2567 Form from the recertification survey dated 7/29/24 - 8/07/24 documented the facility failed to ensure dishes were dry before storing. The facility Plan of Correction (POC) dated 8/08/24 documented a stop and dry sign was created and hung above the clean storage side of the dishwasher. The Registered Dietician or designee would complete weekly audits for sanitation and drying of equipment. An audit would be conducted for 12 weeks and then reviewed by the QAPI committee for compliance. The facility's current survey 6/23/25 to 6/26/25 resulted in deficient practices regarding the storage of wet dishes in the kitchen. Observation on 6/24/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to follow a Care Plan intervention for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed with weight loss. (Resident #1) The facility identified a census of 59 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #1 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. It further indicated diagnoses including: hypertension, non - Alzheimer's Dementia, and cerebrovascular accident. The MDS indicated Resident #1 required extensive assist from staff for transfers, bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #1 was independent with eating. The MDS indicated Resident #1 had a weight loss. On 06/23/25 at 12:28 PM to 1:15 PM during a continuous observation Resident #1 ate her dessert and then got up per self and staff assisted back to her recliner in the main lounge area next to the dining area. The regular lunch had not been served yet. Resident drank a glass of milk per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, manufacturer's directions for cleaning and disinfection, and staff interview, the facility failed to properly sanitize a blood glucose meter used for multiple residents (Residents #5, #7, and #21). The facility identified a census of 59 residents. Findings include: Observation of the 6/25/25 morning medication administration revealed the following: On 6/25/25 at 7:20 AM Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN) reported there is one blood glucose machine (Assurance Platinum meter) on each medication cart that is used for multiple residents. She voiced there are two residents that share the machine on the East hallway, Residents #5 and #21. Observation on 6/25/25 at 7:22 AM revealed Staff D entered Resident #5 room to perform a blood glucose check. She placed the blood glucose meter, cotton balls, lancet, and alcohol prep pads at the foot end of Resident #5 unmade bed. After applying gloves, she moved the blood glucose machine, alcohol pads, lancet, and cotton balls to the Resident's bedside table without a clean barrier underneath. Staff D pulled a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, resident and staff interviews the facility failed to serve foods that was warm and palatable for 1 of 1 meal services observed. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #32 identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS listed diagnoses of anemia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, thyroid disorder, and dysphagia. During an interview on 7/29/24 at 10:52 AM Resident #32 reported the food is terrible and is not hot enough when the meal is served. Observation 07/30/24 at 11:35 AM dietary Staff A, cook wheeled the steam table to Unit I/Unit II dining area. Staff A, cook recorded food temperatures held in the warming pans of the steam table. The dietary supervisor and consultant dietitian were approximately 5 feet away from the steam table observing. The food temperatures revealed the following: a. Pureed fried rice - 127 degrees Fahrenheit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, policy review, and staff interviews the facility failed to demonstrate proper food handling of utensils when serving, allowing dishes, steam table pans, and storage containers to air dry completely, and storing wet wiping cloths in an approved sanitizing solution. The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Findings include: During initial kitchen observation on 7/29/24 at 10:30 AM, observed Staff A, cook removing items from the clean dish rack and did not allow the items to air dry. An 8-inch plastic plate was stacked in a plastic tub near the steam table and 2 clear plastic storage containers (one approximately 6 inches in diameter and one approximately 8 inches in diameter) were stacked on top of other storage containers while still wet. During observation on 7/30/24 at approximately 11:20 AM, Staff A, cook was in the process of preparing pureed items. Staff A, cook had pureed broccoli and rinsed the equipment and placed in the dish rack and slid the dish rack into the dish machine. Staff A went to the hand washing sink, washed her hands, turned the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review, and staff interview the facility call light system failed to alert staff of call light initiated to a central staff work area or directly to a staff member. The facility identified a census of 47 residents. Findings include: On 07/29/24 at 12:36 PM Resident #40 observed in her bathroom, room [ROOM NUMBER], on the toilet by herself, stated she put her call light on but no one came to answer it. The call light has a white and red bulb outside the door to notify the staff the resident had pushed the button. The light outside the room failed to light up even after the surveyor pushed the button in the bathroom. On 07/29/24 at 12:38 PM Staff J, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), assisted Resident #40 out of the bathroom she stated the call light is supposed to make a ringing noise at nurses station. This one does not make ringing noise and one other one so we have to make visual checks just for the bathroom due to the call light does not work. On 07/31/24 at 3:37 PM Staff D,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SHLOMO HOFFMAN — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $420K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA