Beecher Manor Nrsg & Rehab Ctr
1201 Dixie Highway, Beecher, IL 60401 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 128 certified beds · (708) 946-2600 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,935 in federal fines (most recent 2025-11-13)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 74.5% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.4% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.4% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.1% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.3% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.9% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.2% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.1% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.1% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.6% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.76 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.07 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 276 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 93 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 47.0%CMS range 42.1–54.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.1%CMS range 10.5–17.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 4.1–10.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.25 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 119.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.95 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.76 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.08 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to have safety measures in place to prevent a fall. This failure led to a resident sustaining a 3-centimeter laceration to the left parietal scalp, requiring 3 staples for closure. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. The findings include:R1's electronic health records showed that on 10/22/25, R1 was admitted with diagnoses including a displaced fractured left femur, Parkinson's disease, and a history of repeated falls.On 11/12/25 at 9:21 am, V5 Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) said that on 10/30/25 around 10 am, she was providing personal hygiene and dressing R1 while R1 was in bed. At this time R1's upper body was shaking and jerking heavily. V5 said that she had never provided care for R1 before. V5 said she also had not received a report from the off going staff or the nurse on duty about R1. V5 said that she thought that with R1 jerking so heavily that she needed a 2nd staff and a full body mechanical lift. V5 said that she should have done this before she sat R1 on the side of the bed. V5 said she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide safe bed mobility assistance for one (R1) of three resident reviewed for resident injury and siderail use in a sample of seven. These failures resulted R1 incurring a right femur fracture, a nasal fracture and a laceration requiring sutures. This was identified as past non-compliance that occurred from 04/02/2024 to 04/05/2024. Findings include: The 5/7/2024 admission Record shows R1 with diagnoses to include morbid obesity, Hemiplegia and Hemipariesis following brain bleed affecting the left non-dominant side, and contractures. On 5/7/2024 at 10:20 AM R1 laid in bed with an air mattress and one quarter siderail at the top of each side of the bed. R1 had an immobilizer brace to her right lower leg, and contractures to her feet and hands. R1 stated her leg and nose were broke when she was being provided personal care with one staff person instead of the two staff she requires. R1 stated she uses the siderail to assist staff with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services were consistently implemented in accordance with therapy recommendations and resident needs rather than residents approaching MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment review periods. The facility failed to provide restorative programming when restorative aids were reassigned to work on the floor and given an assignment to perform patient care/ staffing duties.This applies to 11 of 13 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R10, R12, R13) reviewed for restorative therapy services. The findings include:1.R12's Face sheet showed R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, lack of coordination, abnormal gait and mobility, abnormal posture, and reduced mobility.R12's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated April 20, 2026, showed R1 had severe cognitive impairment and required maximal assistance/dependance on staff for completion of activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-02 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure privacy for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for personal privacy. This failure resulted in R2 feeling unsafe in the facility.The findings include:R2's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on April 07, 2026. R2 had multiple diagnoses including, radiculopathy, osseous and subluxation stenosis of intervertebral foramina of lumbar region, spondylosis with radiculopathy in the lumbar region, spinal stenosis, difficulty in walking, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, reduced mobility, muscle wasting and atrophy, hyperlipidemia, depression, anxiety, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, spinal stenosis and low back pain.R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 18, 2026 showed R2 was cognitively intact and required supervision or touching assistance for toileting and transfers. R2's most recent care plan showed that R2 refused to use the restroom in the resident's room. R2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a residents nutritional needs were met. This applies to 1 resident (R1) reviewed for significant weight loss in the sample of 9.The findings include: R1's electronic medical record (EMR) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged from the facility on February 15, 2026. R1 had multiple diagnoses including fracture of the left femur, sepsis, difficulty walking, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, hemiplegia, type II diabetes, lack of coordination, dementia, pain, reduced mobility, epilepsy, cerebral ischemic attack, polyneuropathy, hypertension, osteoarthritis, spondylosis, and falls.R1's minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed R1 had severe cognitive impairment and required maximal assistance from staff for eating and oral hygiene.R1's most recent care plan showed R1 had a potential nutritional problem and was receiving a therapeutic and mechanically altered diet. Staff were to monitor, record, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred in a safe manner, resulting in a fall.This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of 5. The findings include:R1's records showed that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, type 2 diabetes, lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy, difficulty walking, and osteoarthritis.On 4/7/26 at 12:34 PM R1 was in her room and staff were transferring R1. R1 was observed with bruising around her right eye, a bruise to her right elbow, an approximate 1-inch wound with 2 steri strips (Steri strips are thin sterile adhesive bandages used to hold edges of small wounds or surgical incisions together while they heal) over the wound and a bruise to her right upper thigh. R1's 4/3/26 11:19 pm progress note R1 had fallen and was observed on the floor on her right side holding her head. R1 was observed with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow fall prevention interventions for residents at high risk of falls for two of six residents (R4, R8) reviewed for falls and safety. The findings include:1. R4 is an [AGE] year-old male with a history of Dementia, Parkinson's Disease, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Lack of Coordination, and Repeat Falls who was admitted to the facility 03/17/2017. On January 23, 2026, at 12:11 PM, A picture of a leaf was located next to R4's name outside of his room, R4 was lying in his room in his bed, R4's bed was raised approximately 2 feet from the floor and not in the lowest position, R4 said he has had a fall at the facility. On January 23, 2026, at 1:09 PM, R4 was lying in his bed, R4's bed was raised approximately 2 feet from the floor and not in the lowest position. On January 24, 2026, at 9:40 AM V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant) said she was not assigned to be R4's aide today but was assigned to him yesterday, there were no specific fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse between two residents. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 4. The findings include: R2's face sheet shows an admission date of 4/25/25. R2's face sheet shows diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, unspecified and Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/27/25 shows nothing entered for the BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) summary score. R2 was assessed as modified independence, meaning some difficulty in new situations only under cognitive skills for decision making. R2's care plan dated 4/25/25 shows he has compromised mental status. R2's progress notes indicate the following: On 4/27/25 at 10:00 AM, (R2) struck (R1) outside of the cafeteria with both hands. (R2) struck the other resident in the face and neck area on the left side. (R2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation. Interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a manner that would prevent foodborne illness. This applies to 112 residents that receive their meal from dietary services. Findings include: On 8/29/24 at 4:43 PM, 112 residents served from the kitchen on 8/27/24 was confirmed with V2 DON (Director of Nursing). On 8/27/24 at 10:03 AM, the kitchen tour was conducted with V25 Dietary Consultant. The dry storage floors were sticky. Vanilla wafers 16 oz (ounce) bag was opened and did not have an open on date or use by date. Spaghetti 10 lb. (pounds) was opened. Walk in cooler- Bag of carrots, celery and onion mix opened no label identifying contents, opened on date use by date 8/23/24. Five-gallon bucket of pickles with unsecured lid Seven cartons of strawberry topping dated 7/17/24. Two 24 oz jars of marinara, one half empty, one with the safety seal broken and no opened on or use by date. Two metal trays of ham chunks covered with saran wrap stored over three pans of Jello, two pans of uncooked roll and three pans of uncooked biscuits.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide hygiene care and maintenance. This applies to 4 of 6 residents reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) in a sample of 37. Findings include: 1. R65 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes cerebral infarction, dysarthria, weakness, aphasia, Alzheimer's, foot drop, basal cell carcinoma, and left artificial knee joint. R65 MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/15/24 shows she is cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for all care needs. On 8/27/24 at 12:47 PM, V16 RN (Registered Nurse) and V3 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) was observed providing incontinence care for R65. R65's incomitance brief was overly saturated with urine. R65's coccyx and perineum were reddened. On 8/28/24 at 1:59 PM, V19 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) assisted R65 with incontinence brief. R65's coccyx and perineum were still reddened. On 8/28/24 at 2:08 PM, V6 RN stated R65 had a skin assessment done on 6/12/24 showing she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have proper fall precaution measures in place for 4 residents (R33, R14, R69 & R52) who are at risk for falls in a sample of 37. The findings include: 1. On 08/27/24 at 10:46 AM R33 was observed in her bed with her bed in a high position. R14 said that the CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) had left the bed in that position for the last hour. V3 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) was present at that time. R33's 8/27/24 care plan showed that she is at risk for falls related to injury, weakness, impaired balance, decreased mobility and transfers, poor judgment and decreased safety awareness, dementia, and a history of falls. The interventions showed keep bed in lowest position with brakes locked. 2. 08/28/24 at 03:09 PM R14 was observed in bed with a mat on the left side of her bed but not on the right side of her bed. R14's 6/17/24 care plan showed that she is at risk for fall related injury due to a diagnosis of CVA (cerebral vascular accident) with left hemiparesis, obesity, decreased mobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) Guidelines by staff not wearing gowns during incontinent care to EBP residents and not having a trash can inside the resident room and near the exit for discarding PPE after removal. The facility also failed to maintain effective hand hygiene during resident care. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R1, R56, R40, and R80) reviewed for infection control practices in a sample of 37. The findings include: 1. R1 is an [AGE] year-old female with mild cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 8/28/24 at 1:57 PM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN) stated that R1 is on EBP because of her wounds, suprapubic catheter, and nephrostomy tube. On 8/28/24 at 10:20 AM, the surveyor observed V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant -CNA) & V10 (CNA) providing incontinent care to R1 without wearing a gown. On 08/28/24 at 10:25 AM, V8 stated that anybody with wounds or catheters is treated as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ambulatory resident with continuous oxygen (a portable oxygen tank holder). This applies to 1 of 1 residents (R76) reviewed for oxygen in a sample of 37. Findings include: On 8/27/24 at 10:52 AM, R76 was observed lying in bed wearing 4 liters of oxygen per nasal cannula. R76 said 4 liters was her baseline oxygen setting and what she was wearing at home before coming to facility. R76 said she is able to walk to the bathroom by herself, but she does not have a way to bring the oxygen with her to the bathroom. R76 said she has a portable oxygen tank holder on the back of her wheelchair, but her wheelchair is bariatric and is too wide to fit into the bathroom. R76 said when she has a bowel movement she requires staff assistance to help wipe and it can take them a long time to come and help her in the bathroom. R76 said she feels short of breath after a few minutes without her oxygen on while bearing down for a bowel movement, while waiting for staff assistance, and while pulling her pants up. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain current and accurate advanced directives for 2 residents (R69, R115) in a sample of 37. Findings include: On 08/28/24 at 02:03 PM until 02:09 PM, the state surveyor and V2 DON (Director of Nursing) were conducting a record review for R69 and R115. 1. R69's electronic health record showed 6/21/24 Full Code Status POLST (Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) Declaration form, and the Advance Directive book at the nurses' station showed R69's 2/23/21 DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) form. 2. R115's electronic health record showed a 5/11/24 DNR form and in the Advance Directive book it showed R115's 2/16/24 Full Code form. On 08/28/24 02:13 PM V2 (DON) V2 said that both the Advance Directive book and the electronic health record should be the same because if they are not the facility may not give the right life sustaining measures that the person wants. The facility's Advance Directive policy dated November 2016 showed that copies of written advance directives documents will be filed uploaded in the residence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility confined a resident to her bed by placing interconnected bed bolsters on both sides of the bed and two upper side rails up. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R81) reviewed for physical restraint in a sample of 37. The findings include: R81 is a [AGE] year-old female with moderate cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE]. On 8/29/24 at 9:45 AM, during wound care with V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) and V16 (wound care nurse), R81 was observed with a wedge to her right upper body with both upper side rails up and two Bolsters to the bottom of bed inter-connected with a strap. On 8/29/24 at 9:45 AM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing / ADON) stated, Those bolsters are inter-connected with a strap restricting her to get out of bed. It can be a restraint if we don't have a physician order. We put it there to prevent her fall. R81's care plan does not indicate any use of bed bolsters planned for resident care (falls). R81's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed hold policy to 1 resident (R69) or representative before being transferred to the hospital in a sample of 37. Findings include: On 08/28/24 at 11:46 AM a review of R69's electronic health record showed that on 8/6/24 R69 was sent to the hospital for labored breathing, oxygen saturation at 86% while on 2 liters of oxygen, a blood pressure of 100/46, and a heart rate of 143. The record review did not show any documentation that R69, or his representative, received a copy of the facility's bed hold policy. On 8/29/24 02:14 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said that the facility did not have any documentation showing that the resident or representative received the facility's bed hold policy. On 8/29/24 at 4:06 PM, V2 DON said that it is her expectations that the facility staff provide the resident or the resident's representative, the facility's bed hold policy when they are being transferred to the hospital.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's order to provide wound care. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for wound treatment and care in a sample of 37. The Findings include: R1 is an [AGE] year-old female with mild cognitive impairment as per the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 8/29/24 at 10:01 AM, V16 (Wound Care Nurse) and V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) provided wound care to R1. V16 removed the old dressing from the right hip wound and observed no hydrofera blue (thick blue pad to absorb exudate/drainage from the wound). V16 then cleansed the right hip wound with saline, pat dry it, and applied Hydrofera blue with a gauze dressing. On 8/29/24 at 10:10 AM, V16 removed the old dressing from the right hip superior wound and observed no hydrofera blue (thick blue pad to absorb exudate/drainage from the wound). On 8/29/24 at 10:10 AM, in response to the surveyor's inquiry, V16 stated that she changed R1's wound dressing yesterday and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide restorative care services. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R65 and R74) reviewed for rehab services in a sample of 37. Findings include: 1. R65 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes cerebral infarction, dysarthria, weakness, aphasia, Alzheimer's, foot drop, basal cell carcinoma, and left artificial knee joint. R65 MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/15/24 shows she is cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for all care needs. R65 current care plan includes nursing rehab PROM (Passive Range of Motion) to right hand with 3 sets 4 reps 6-7 days a week as tolerated. Restorative program to apply right wrist splint apply upon rising remove at night. Review of R65's restorative care documentation for August 2024 shows she received PROM 18 times August 1st through August 29th. R65's right hand splint was placed 17 times August 1st through August 29th. On 8/27/24 at 12:44 PM, R65 did not have a splint on her hand.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label, date, and discard old food and beverages from resident's personal refrigerators. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R34 and R49) in the sample of 37. The findings include: 1. On 08/27/24 at 10:52 AM R34's personal refrigerator in her room had nine soft, and old individual ice cream sandwiches in the freezer. The ice cream sandwiches did not have an opened or expiration date. R34 said it's been a long time since I ate one. R34 stated the staff assists her with cleaning out the refrigerator. On 08/28/24 at 1:43 PM the individual ice cream sandwiches remained in the freezer. On 08/28/24 at 1:46 PM V13 (Housekeeper) stated she cleans the resident's refrigerators out. V13 said she did not know R34 had old ice cream sandwiches. V13 said old, soft ice cream should not be in the refrigerator. R34 could get sick if she eats it. On 08/29/24 at 9:37 AM V2 (Director of Nursing) said all residents food in the personal refrigerators should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an alleged accusation of misappropriation of resident narcotics. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R1-R10) reviewed for misappropriation of property in the sample of 10. The findings include: R1-R10 were on narcotics and resided in zones that V3 RN (Registered Nurse) was scheduled to work per facility nursing assignment sheets. On 10/10/23 at 9:33 AM, and 1:40 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that during suspension of an employee (V6 Certified Nurses Assistant) related to an altercation that occurred involving her and two other Registered Nurses (V3 and V5). V6 stated V3 was taking narcotics from the carts. V2 stated that the altercation had occurred during overnight shift from 10/03/23 to 10/04/23 at 1:30 AM. V2 stated an investigation [for misappropriation of property] was initiated on 10/04/23 when the suspension occurred [for inappropriate staff behavior]. V2 added that a narcotic count of residents was done and residents on PM narcotics were interviewed and no issues were found. V2 stated documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence of a thorough investigation regarding allegation of misappropriation of resident narcotics. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R1-R10) reviewed for misappropriation of property in the sample of 10. The findings include: R1-R10 were on narcotics and resided in Zones that V3 RN (Registered Nurse) was scheduled to work per facility nursing assignment sheets. On 10/10/23 at 9:33 AM, and 1:40 PM V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that during suspension of an employee (V6 Certified Nurses Assistant) related to an altercation that occurred involving her and two other Registered Nurses (V3 and V5), V6 stated that V3 was taking narcotics from the carts. V2 stated that the altercation had occurred during overnight shift from 10/03/23 to 10/04/23 at 1:30 AM. V2 stated that an investigation [for misappropriation of property] was initiated that same morning when the suspension occurred [for inappropriate staff behavior]. V2 added that a narcotic count of residents was done and residents on PM narcotics were interviewed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a wound dressing was in place for a resident with a stage 4 pressure ulcer. This applies to 1 out of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure wounds in a sample of 3. Findings include: On 9/29/23 at 2:28 PM, surveyor observed R2's sacral pressure wound with V3 (Wound Nurse). V3 stated R2's sacral wound is a stage 4 wound. When V3 opened R2's incontinence brief to visualize the dressing, the brief was soaked with urine and feces. No dressing was in place on her sacral wound. On 9/29/23 at 2:30 PM, V3 verified the dressing had come off and stated no one notified her to replace it. In R2's 9/27/23 Wound Evaluation and Management Summary, the Site 1 Focused Wound Exam showed a full thickness stage 4 pressure wound of the sacrum with duration of more than 207 days, with an objective to manage the moderate serous exudate. The Summary lists wound size in cm (centimeters) as 4 cm long x 3.5 cm wide x 1 cm deep. The Summary also lists wound undermining of 2.5 cm.at 9 o'clock. Primary dressing Alginate calcium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-07-20 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) has the required professional training to perform the role. This failure has the potential to affect all 114 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Resident Census and Condition of Residents report dated 7/17/23 documents a total of 114 residents residing in the facility. On 7/18/23 at 12:41 PM, V6 (Infection Preventionist) stated, I do not have a degree. I took the class through the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). On 7/18/23 at 2:16 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated corporate told her (V1) the IP did not need a degree as long as the training was completed. V1 affirmed V6 does not have any training in nursing or any health-related fields. V1 also added V6 did have a degree. On 7/19/23 at 10:17 AM, V6's personnel file showed V6 does not have any professional training and/or degrees other than a certificate from a Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course dated 7/18/22 among other basic training certificates. The file showed V6 was previously…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene. This applies to 7 of 7 residents (R3, R23, R40, R50, R57, R89, R110) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) in the sample of 24. The findings include: 1. R50 had multiple diagnoses which included dementia, functional quadriplegia, acquired absence of right hand, cognitive communication deficit, and weakness, based on the face sheet. R50's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated 5/8/23 showed that R50 was severely impaired with cognition. The same MDS showed that R50 required extensive assistance from staff with personal hygiene. On 7/17/23 at 11:41 AM, R50 was sitting in his wheelchair across the unit nursing station. R50 had right below elbow amputation. R50's left hand fingernails were long, jagged, with black substances underneath. R50 had an accumulation of facial hair. R50 stated that he wanted to be shaven, and his fingernail trimmed and cleaned. V7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve sauce over mechanically ground chicken as shown on menu spreadsheet. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R67, R88, R92, R99, R110) observed for dining in the sample of 24. The findings include: On 7/17/23 starting at 12:25 PM, during lunch meal service, R67 and R99 received very dry ground chicken without any sauce over it or ranch dressing on the side. R88 also received a room tray without any sauces on the dry ground meat or ranch dressing on the side. R92 and R110 received the dry ground chicken and received one packet of ranch sauce on the side. R92 took only a few bites and stated she does not want the rest. R92 stated she cannot open the ranch dressing packet. R110 was attempting to pick up the dry flaky ground chicken with her fork with some spillage and stated she is unable to open the ranch dressing packet. V1 (Administrator) who was in the vicinity, was notified about R92 and R110. On 7/17/23 at 12:31 PM, when V19 (Cook), who was at the tray line, was asked why the residents on mechanical soft…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices with regards to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of care, and use of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) when entering an isolation room. The facility also failed to ensure a resident had a physician's order for isolation, and the indwelling urinary catheter bag was not touching the floor. This applies to 6 of the 24 residents (R24, R40, R48, R57, R60, R67) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 24. The findings include: Face sheet shows that R57 is 83 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, lack of coordination and weakness. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R57 requires extensive assistance for personal hygiene. 1. On 7/18/23 at 4:39 PM, V30 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) rendered incontinence care to R57 who was wet with urine. V30 cleaned R57 from front to back of the perineum,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor and track the status of influenza (flu) and pneumococcal (pneumonia) vaccinations to ensure eligible residents were offered a vaccine or residents who consented to receive a vaccine actually received it. This failure affected 5 out of 5 (R2, R48, R60, R66, R90) residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations in the total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: On 7/19/23 at approximately 10:30 AM, the influenza and pneumococcal vaccine consents were compared to the spreadsheet V6 (Infection Preventionist) provided for tracking of the flu and pneumonia vaccines. The following concerns were identified: 1. For R2, the tracking sheet was noted blank for both the flu and pneumonia. R2's Informed Consent for Vaccinations shows a verbal consent for the Influenza Vaccine was obtained on 10/16/20 from R2's POA. The pneumococcal immunization section was left blank. A second Informed Consent for Vaccinations was provided for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to apply a splint and provide treatment plan as recommended and ordered to prevent contractures. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R24) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 24. The findings include: R24's diagnoses on the face sheet included Multiple sclerosis, Weakness, Dysarthria and Anarthria, Aphasia. R24's POS (Physician Order Sheet) included Restorative Programming PROM (Passive Range of Motion) to bilateral upper/lower extremities 10 reps [repetition] times one set, daily 6 to 7 days a week start date 5/17/23. The POS also included for R24 to get up in the [mechanical] chair on Monday, Wednesday and Friday from 1:00 PM-4:00 PM. R24's Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/17/23 showed R24 requires total dependence of two-person physical assistance for transfer and has impairment on both sides for functional range of motion. On 7/17/23 at 10:53 AM, on 7/18/23 at 11:14 AM and 1:38 PM, and on 7/19/23 at 11:25 AM, R24 was seen lying in bed and noted to have no hand splint on. R24 was nonverbal and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence and catheter care in a manner that would prevent potential urinary tract infection and reduce friction at the catheter insertion site. This applies to 4 of 7 residents (R40, R57, R60, R67) reviewed for incontinence and catheter care in the sample of 24. The findings include: 1. Face sheet shows that R57 is 83 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, lack of coordination and weakness. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows that R57 requires extensive assistance for personal hygiene. On 7/18/23 at 4:39 PM, V30 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) rendered incontinence care to R57 who was wet with urine. V30 used wet wipes to clean R57 from front to back of her peri-area. V30 wiped R57 in a downward stroke from the pubic area down to the groin, and from pubic area down to outer labia. However, V30 did not separate the labia to clean inner area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that accurate documentation of controlled drugs was maintained. This applies 6 of 6 residents (R2, R5, R12, R29, R66, R99) reviewed for controlled medications. The findings include: On 7/19/23 9:30 AM, the zone 2 medication cart was reviewed with the nurse on duty, V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse). V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) was present. During the review of controlled substances on the medication cart it was noted that quantities of resident medication on hand did not match the quantity documented for 4 residents as follows: R99's prescribed Lacosamide 100 MG (milligrams) tablet, was to be administered one tablet by mouth every 12 hours. The actual quantity on hand in the blister-pack medication package showed there were 20 tablets remaining, and R99's-controlled drug receipt documented there were 21 tablets remaining. R5's prescribed Phenobarbital 64.8 MG tablet, was to be administered one tablet by mouth every morning and two tablets by mouth at bedtime. The actual quantity on hand in R5's blister-pack medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have a facility wide IPCP (Infection Prevention Control Plan) and failed to provide an Infection surveillance plan. The facility also failed to follow standard infection control practices during provisions of care related to hand hygiene and gloving for R20, R48, R55 and R77. This applies to all 94 residents residing at the facility. The findings include: 1. On April 20, 2022, V1 (Administrator) said she has never seen the facility's IPCP and has been looking for it since February 2022. She said that she has no knowledge of the facility's infection control policies having been reviewed after the dates shown on the policies. V1 said that the facility should have an IPCP, and the infection control policies should be updated at least annually. On April 20, 2022, V2 (Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist) said she could not find the facility's IPCP, and she has worked at the facility for a year and in that time the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-04-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to have an ongoing antibiotic stewardship program. This applies to all 94 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: On April 20, 2022, V2 (Infection Preventionist/Director of Nursing) said that the facility does not have an antibiotic stewardship program or plan. V2 said she tracks antibiotics on a spreadsheet, but she doesn't put the results or the effects of the antibiotics, on the tracking sheet. V2 said that the facility does not have protocols for prescribing antibiotics. On April 21, 2022, V1 (Administrator) said that the facility should have an antibiotic stewardship program, but she could not find it and does not recall seeing it. V1 said that the facility should have the program so the facility can provide good care and to meet regulations. A review of the form CMS-672 (Resident Census and Condition of Residence) dated April 18, 2022 shows that the facility had a total of 94 residents. On April 20, 2022, a review of V2's antibiotic spreadsheet did not show results or effects of the prescribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. R62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included resistance to Vancomycin-VRE (Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus), unspecified and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, based on the face sheet. R62's admission MDS (minimum data set) dated March 13, 2022 shows that the resident is cognitively intact and would require limited assistance from the staff with most of his ADL (activities of daily living). R62 is on contact precaution due to diagnosis of CRE (carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales) of the wound. On April 19, 2022 at 11:29 AM, R62 was in bed alert, oriented and verbally responsive. R62's urinary catheter tubing was observed with scattered white sediments. After providing pressure injury treatment to R62's coccyx area, V3 (Nurse) and V7 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) turned and repositioned R62. Prior to turning and repositioning the resident, V7 unhooked R62's urinary catheter bag from the left side of the bedframe and handed (over the bed) the said urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor and assess the IV (intravenous) antibiotic administration and failed to disconnect and flush the midline catheter after completion of the IV antibiotic administration. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R72) reviewed for IV medication administration in the sample of 20. The findings include: R72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses which included UTI (urinary tract infection) based on the face sheet. R72's admission MDS (minimum data set) dated March 23, 2022, shows that the resident is cognitively intact and would require extensive assistance from the staff with most of her ADL (activities of daily living). On April 19, 2022, at 12:05 PM, V8 (RN/Registered Nurse) started the IV antibiotic for R72 via midline catheter on the resident's left arm. The IV antibiotic bag label indicated that the IV medication was a reconstituted Meropenem 500 mg with 50 ml Normal saline. The same IV antibiotic bag label shows…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform treatment for pressure ulcers that would prevent potential development of infection. This applies to 2 of 8 residents (R55 and R62) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a total sample of 20 residents. The findings include: 1. R55's EHR (Electronic Health Record) showed R55 had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, congestive heart failure, pemphigus vulgaris, and urinary tract infection. The EHR continued to show R55 was on contact isolation for and MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) of the blood. R55's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated April 1, 2022, showed R55 had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS continued to show R55 required the assistance of two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and dressing. R55's Physician Order Report showed an order dated April 1 2022, to swab the left heel with betadine and wrap with gauze to protect. A Progress Note dated April 12, 2022, by V18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that assessment, monitoring, and targeted behavior is being documented for a resident who is receiving psychotropic medications. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R45) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 20. The findings include: Face sheet documents that R45 is [AGE] years old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include Altered Mental Status, Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder. On 4/18/22 and 4/19/22 between 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM, R45 was randomly observed in her bedroom. She was sitting on her wheelchair with flat affect. When state representative approached R45 to greet her and asked questions, R45 just stared without expression on her face. Physician Order Sheet (POS) showed multiple medication prescriptions which include Zyprexa (olanzapine) tablet 5 mg given at bedtime (8:00 PM) and Effexor XR (venlafaxine) capsule 150 mg given orally once a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0888 — isolatedEnsure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all staff were fully vaccinated for COVID-19. This has the potential to affect all 94 residents in the facility. Findings include: According to the COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Status for Providers list, the facility had a total of 345 staff members. There are two staff members partially vaccinated. The Staff Formulas calculations showed the facility has a 99.4 percent staff vaccination rate. The COVID-19 Staff Vaccination Status for Providers list showed V11 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) and V17 (housekeeper) only received one vaccination of a multi-dose vaccine for COVID-19. On April 20, 2022, at 11:15 AM, V11 performed incontinence care on R48. On April 19, 2022, at 12:10 PM, V17 was wheeling his housekeeping cart out of the resident care area, wearing a surgical mask. V17 said he was unvaccinated when he applied for the job and received his first vaccination the day he started. On April, 20, 2022, at 10:55 AM, V17 was cleaning R19 and R56's room wearing a surgical mask. On April 20, 2022, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-08-30 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a pest-free environment to residents by having house flies and gnats in the resident rooms and common areas. This applies to all 117 residents residing in the facility. The Findings include: R57 is a [AGE] year-old female with moderate cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 8/27/24 at 11:31 AM, the surveyor observed house flies in R57's room and on R57. On 8/27/24 at 11:31 AM, R57 stated, I do have flies here, and I don't know how to get rid of them. 08/27/24 02:29 PM, house flies around the food cart were observed in front of the Kitchen hallway. On 8/28/24 at 10:13 AM, the surveyor observed R57's room again with a house fly on her (left leg). 08/28/24 at 10:32 AM, observed gnats and house flies around North Nurse's station. On 08/29/24, at 11:20 AM, house flies were observed in the South Nurse's station. As per the surveyor's notification, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) cleansed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,935 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,935 — penalty dated 2025-11-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B & Z GRANDCHILDREN TR | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2013 |
| ARONIN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2018 |
| ISRAEL, LEVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| WOZNIAK, PATRISHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/13/2024 |
| EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| EXTENDED CARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| ROTH & CO, LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/08/2025 |
| ASADULLAH, KHAJA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/10/2015 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145538. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.