Chateau Nrsg & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 37.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 121.9 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.34 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess a resident for post-fall complications, including failing to identify worsening acute pain and failing to obtain timely diagnostics. This failure resulted in a resident receiving delayed care for his left hip fracture.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 5. The findings include:R1's 2/17/26 progress note from 5:30 AM showed R1 .was noted on the floor in front of his wheelchair in an upright sitting position, sustaining a skin tear to the left elbow. When asked what happened, (R1) said that he was reaching for papers on the chair and slid out of the wheelchair. Left elbow cleansed and dressing applied. Wife made aware and also NP [Nurse Practitioner] aware of fall.On 4/23/26 at 10:12 AM, V3 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated that R1 had a fall on 2/17/26 at 5:30 AM. V3 stated R1 got up from his wheelchair and ambulated with his rolling walker to the bed without assistance. V3 stated R1 got up from his bed, tripped over his leg rest and fell to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a resident from falling off the bed during care resulting in R1 sustaining a femur fracture. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of 3. The findings include: On March 11, 2025, at 10:39 AM, V3 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) said on February 24, 2025, she had gone to R1's room to change R1's incontinence brief. V3 said R1 was a one-assist from staff and could help her with some things. V3 said when she walked into R1's room to the left side of the bed, she observed R1's body was closer to the right side of the bed, versus being centered. V3 said she flattened R1's bed out and picked up her draw sheet from underneath her left side and told her to turn towards the right, and as V3 turned R1 away from her, R1's legs started falling off the bed out of the right side. V3 said she tried to catch them, but it was too late, and R1 had fallen out of the bed onto the ground. V3 said she ran and notified the nurse. V3 said R1 was on an air mattress, which should have had bolsters…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident who is at high risk for falls for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 falling out of bed and sustaining a laceration to her forehead requiring stitches. The findings include: R1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows that her cognition is impaired and R1 has had one fall with no injury and two or more falls with injury since her prior assessment. On 1/21/25 at 11:11 AM, V3, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said that on 1/3/25 he went into R1's room to get her up for the morning. V3 said that he removed her fall mat from the floor and removed her bed bolsters from the bed in order to provide incontinence care. V3 said that after incontinence care was provided, he lowered the bed and went to get the mechanical lift sling. V3 said that when he turned back around, he saw R1 with her upper body out of the bed and her head on the floor. V3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-09-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify areas of pressure before becoming unstageable and failed to change the dressings as ordered by the Physician. This applies to three of eight residents (R49, R38, R81) in the sample of 24 reviewed for pressure. This failure resulted in two residents (R49) and (R38) developing unstageable pressure injuries. The findings include: 1. The facility face sheet for R49 shows diagnosis to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and hemiplegia. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows her to have severe cognitive impairment and requires extensive assistance with bed mobility. The wound management detail report for R49 shows a pressure ulcer to the right heel was first identified on 6/28/2022. At that time the wound measured 4 by 3 centimeters with necrotic tissue present. The wound was not staged until 7/14/2022 and was staged as unstageable with slough and eschar. The care plan for R49 dated 6/27/2022 shows interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-27 · tag F0776 — isolated
  Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a timely hip X-ray was obtained for a resident after a fall. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for diagnostic services in a sample of 5.The findings include:R1's 2/17/26 progress note from 5:30 AM showed .noted on the floor in front of his wheelchair in an upright sitting position, sustaining a skin tear to the left elbow. When asked what happened, (R1) said that he was reaching for papers on the chair and slid out of the wheelchair. Left elbow cleansed and dressing applied. Wife made aware and also NP (Nurse Practitioner) aware of fall .R1's 2/17/26 progress note from 1:57 PM (written by V6-Nurse Practitioner/NP) showed The patient had a fall on 2/17/26. The staff reported that (R1) was noted on the floor in front of the wheelchair in an upright sitting position, sustaining a skin tear to the left elbow. The examiner assessed the resident. (R1) stated that he was sitting on the edge of the bed and used his walker to reach papers on a chair and fell. (R1) indicates pain in the left hip. (R1) is unable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its abuse prevention policy by not protecting a resident from verbal abuse from staff. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for verbal Abuse in a sample of 3. The Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with an admitting diagnosis including vascular dementia. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents that R1 has severe cognitive impairment. On 12/10/24 at 10:10 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse / RN) stated, When I came back from vacation on 12/4/24, I heard from V6 (RN) and V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN) about the verbal abuse from V4 to R1. R1 is very confused, and I heard V4 called R1 something with the 'f_ _ k' word. On 12/10/24 at 10:13 AM, R1 stated in the presence of V5 (Registered Nurse / RN), It's been a while since someone called me with the 'F' word. But I don't know who or when. On 12/10/24 at 10:15 AM, V7 stated, On 11/20/24 during lunchtime, I was sitting in the nurse's station…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its abuse prevention policy by not reporting a verbal abuse allegation to state agency. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse reporting in a sample of 3. The Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with an admitting diagnosis including vascular dementia. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents that R1 has severe cognitive impairment. On 12/10/24 at 10:10 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse / RN) stated, When I came back from vacation on 12/4/24, I heard from V6 (RN) and V7 (Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN) about the verbal Abuse from V4 to R1. R1 is very confused, and I heard V4 called R1 something with the 'f_ _ k' word. On 12/10/24 at 10:15 AM, V7 stated, On 11/20/24 during lunchtime, I was sitting in the nurse's station and could see R1 in the dining room. V4 took R1's tray away, and R1 raised her hand and hit the tray, causing the coffee cup to fall off the tray along with other food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-24 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a personal mail with a gift check was given to the resident whom it was addressed to, and not deposited to the transferring account intended for payment of the resident's room and board. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for personal funds in the sample of 3. The findings include: Face sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], shows that R1 is 83 years-old who is alert and oriented. R1 was independent to some of her activities of daily living (ADL) care and needs supervision to some. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On September 23, 2024, at 10:17 AM, R1 said that she has been living in this facility for almost 2 years. R1 receives her husband's pension from the police department, and she has social security benefits as well. These checks go straight to the facility for payment of her room, board, and treatment. In addition, R1 usually receives a check every Christmas from the Policemen's Annuity and Benefit Fund…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect all 116 residents that receive food prepared in the facility kitchen. The findings include: Facility provided information that the census on August 5, 2024, was 117 residents with one resident on NPO (nothing by mouth) status. On August 5, 2024, at 9:17 AM, during initial tour of the kitchen the following observations were made: At the 3-compartment sink, used for wash, rinse and sanitizing dishes, dirty dishes were seen in the sanitizing sink. V6 (Dietary Aide) was seen washing the dishes in the middle sink, which should be used for rinsing dishes. V6 stated that she is going to fill the sanitizing sink with sanitizer. V6 then removed the dirty pans from the sanitizing sink and filled it with water mixed with sanitizer. It was noted that the sanitizing well still had food debris from the dirty pans and also had dirty rags in it. When notified that the sanitizer was contaminated, V6 cleaned and refilled the sanitizing sink…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R20, R85, R100 and R108) reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living) in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R108 had multiple diagnoses including, dementia with other behavioral disturbance and weakness, based on the face sheet. R108's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated July 23, 2024, showed that the resident was severely impaired with cognitive skills for daily decision making. The same MDS showed that R108 was totally dependent on the staff with her ADLs including upper body dressing and personal hygiene. On August 5, 2024, at 11:36 AM, R108 was sitting in her reclining wheelchair inside the unit dining/activity room. R108 was alert but confused. R108's fingernails were short with black substances underneath. R108 was observed sticking her fingers inside her mouth. V14 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) was present…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the dietary staff followed the approved recipe for chef salad. This applies to 8 of 8 (R25, R26, R27, R6, R84, R91, R101, R113) residents reviewed for dining in the sample of 25. The findings include: Facility Spring/Summer 2024 (Week 4) Menu on Thursday [August 1, 2024] showed Chef's salad, seasonal fruit, baked fresh roll, cinnamon apple sauce, margarine. On August 5, 2024, at 3:23 PM, R6 stated The whole place got a bowl container of some kind of lettuce with no meat or cheese. There was no bread roll served with it. I ate in the dining room, and everybody was startled. I did not ask for anything else as it was night-time, and the people (from kitchen) had cleaned up and left. On August 5, 2024, at 3:22 PM, R26 stated Last week some time at dinner I got a bowl of lettuce with ranch dressing and no meat. I ate in my room and did not say anything. On August 5, 2024, at 3:18 PM, R91 stated Sometime for dinner last week we got a bowl of shredded lettuce with no meat. I thought 'What is this?' I felt like a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices with regards to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of incontinence care. This applies to 5 of 25 (R20, R62, R64, R80, R85) residents reviewed for infection control in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On August 6, 2024, at 11:25 AM, V24 and V26 (Both Certified Nursing Assistants/CNAs) rendered peri-care to R80. V24 cleaned R80's perineum from front to back, then she placed a clean incontinence brief underneath R80 while wearing same gloves. V24 then, changed her gloves without performing hand hygiene and continued to reposition R80. V24 then handled the indwelling urinary catheter bag and straightened clean bed linens without performing hand hygiene in between tasks. 2. On August 6, 2024, at 1:39 PM, V25 (CNA) assisted R62 to the toilet where R62 voided and had a bowel movement. After R62 used the toilet, she wiped her frontal perineum, then V25 assisted R62 to stand up and cleaned R62's back perineum. V25 wiped R62's rectum multiple times, pulled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the indwelling urinary catheter was not positioned above the resident's bladder and failed to clean the catheter tube during incontinence care. This applies to 2 of 4 (R64 and R80) residents reviewed for peri-care and catheter care in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R80's face sheet shows that R80 has multiple medical diagnoses which includes Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms. On August 6, 2024, at 11:25 AM, R80 was resting in bed, he had an indwelling urinary catheter with the urinary bag hanging on the left side of the bed. V24 and V26 (Both Certified Nursing Assistants/CNA) rendered peri-care to R80. V24 cleaned R80's perineum from front to back. V24 cleaned the tip of R80's penis, however, she but did not clean the catheter tube. When V24 and V26 repositioned R80 on his right side, V24 lifted and handed the urinary bag to V26 to place it on the right side of the bed. The urinary bag was lifted high above the bladder which made the urine inside the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to check the placement of the gastrostomy tube (g-tube) prior to administration of medication. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R80) reviewed for gastrostomy tube in the sample of 25. The findings include: On August 7, 2024, at 9:47 AM, V29 (Nurse) administered Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 milligram tablet to R80 via g-tube. V29 flushed R80's g-tube with 60 milliliters (ml) of water and then administered Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen. Then V29 flushed the g-tube again with 60 ml of water. V29 did not check the placement of the g-tube prior to administering the medication. V29 stated that she forgot to do it. On August 7, 2024, at 10:51 AM, V28 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) stated that when giving g-tube medication, the staff should check for the placement of the g-tube either by aspiration of residual or auscultation with stethoscope. This is to make sure that the medication is going into the right place. One of R80's g-tube care plan interventions dated July 15, 2024, shows Check placement and patency of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$75,389 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $17,215 — penalty dated 2026-04-27
• $47,655 — penalty dated 2025-07-30
• $10,519 — penalty dated 2025-03-13
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-23 for 17 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL