Lemont Nursing & Rehab Center
12450 Walker Road, Lemont, IL 60439 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 173 certified beds · (630) 243-0400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.3% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.4% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 81.5% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.7% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.1% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.2% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.4% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.9% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.7% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 46.6% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.5% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.18 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.77 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 376 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 144 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.0%CMS range 59.4–69.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.3%CMS range 10.8–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.6%CMS range 3.5–8.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 173 beds and averages 144.1 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.90 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-01-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve pureed diet as ordered by a Physician to a resident (R1) that has had a recent history of swallowing problems. This failure contributed to the resident having a significant weight loss. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for improper nursing in the sample of 6. The findings include: R1's EMR (electronic medical records) included diagnoses of osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, pressure ulcer of right buttock, stage 4, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, other cerebral palsy, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, anorexia nervosa. R1's Annual MDS (minimum data set) dated November 06, 2024 showed that R1 was moderately impaired in cognition and was dependent on staff for all ADL's (activities of daily living) including eating. R1's diet order on POS (Physician Order Summary) showed Pureed diet (start date January 09, 2025). R1's weight (in lbs/pounds) history in EMR included as follows: 81.8 lbs (January 16, 2025), 89.8 lbs (December 17,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update a Care Plan indicating the need for transfer assistance after a significant change in condition for R1. This deficiency affects one (R1) of three residents reviewed for Care Plan revision.Findings include:On 6/6/26 at 12:00PM, physician note dated 4/18/26 was reviewed and indicates the following for R1: Right Lower Extremity- non weight bearing due to fracture (RLE-NWB d/t fracture).R1 has an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance/mobility deficit Care Plan-date Initiated: 10/01/2025 with intervention TRANSFER: The resident is able to: move between surfaces with max assist x 1person date Initiated: 10/27/2025.On 6/6/26 at 2:15PM, V1 (Director of Nursing) said that for R1 the Transfer status as of 4/18/26 should be updated to reflect the residents non weight bearing status. V1 said she is unsure why the care plan shows transfer status x 1 person assist and should be a Mechanical lift transfer due to non-weight bearing to the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a manner that prevents food borne illness.This applies to all 135 residents receiving dietary services.Findings include:The CMS 671 start date of 01/06/2026 shows a total of 135 residents residing in the facility. On 01/07/2026 at 2:35 PM, V1 Administrator confirmed all 135 residents received meal services from the dietary department.On 01/06/2026 at 1:51 PM, R108 stated he did not want to eat from the facility cutlery because it isn't clean when he receives it. R108 stated he would rather use plastic.On 01/06/2026 at 9:53 AM, the kitchen tour began with V19 Dietary Manager.The stove had a silver facility pan on an open flame with brown gravy and had plastic wrap covering.Two areas of the kitchen were prepping food. Only one red sanitation bucket was in use. The red sanitization bucket tested at 0 ppm (Parts Per Million).The high temperature dish machine was run to test. The dishwasher was dirty inside and out with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required twelve (12) hours per year of continuing competence training for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA's), including dementia management training. This failure has the potential to affect all 135 residents in the facility. The findings include: The facility's January 6, 2026, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Form 671, Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid, showed 135 residents live in the facility. On 01/07/26 at 2:19 PM, V5 (Human Resources Director) said V2 (Director of Nursing) is responsible for in-service trainings and competencies of the CNAs. V5 stated she did not know who tracks the CNA yearly hours and did not know how many hours are required. V5 stated she did not know which mandatory trainings must be included in the hours. On 01/07/26 at 2:32 PM, V2 stated she did not know how many training hours CNAs were supposed to have every year. V2 stated she didn't know what the mandatory trainings for the CNAs were. On 01/07/26, review of the facility's CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have orders in place for pacemaker monitoring and that the orders are carried out. This applies to 2 residents (R4 and R93) reviewed for pacemaker care.The findings include:1.On 1/6/26 at 10:49 AM and 1/8/26 at 9:52 AM a pacemaker monitor with a green light was observed on the nightstand in R4's room.R4's Face sheet shows she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following diagnoses: dementia, hypertension, heart failure, sick sinus syndrome, and presence of cardiac pacemaker. As of 1/7/26, R4's POS (Physician Order Sheet) did not show any physician order for pacemaker checks and there was no documentation in the electronic health record showing what type of pacemaker R4 had, the model or serial number, the programmed pulse rate, and/or how often pacemaker checks are to be completed. R4's Care Plan initiated on 11/18/25 shows she has a pacemaker related to atrial fibrillation and dysrhythmias but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions for a resident's comprehensive pressure ulcer management strategy, including offloading a wound, mattress use, and nutritional supplement use. This applies to 1 resident (R123) reviewed for pressure injuries in a sample of 3. The findings include: R123's Face Sheet shows an admission date of 8/9/2025 with diagnoses including stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region, dementia, and dysphagia. On 1/8/2026 at 1:40 PM, V26 (R123's Primary Physician) stated that his expectation is for facility staff to follow V24's (Wound Doctor) recommendations to ensure proper offloading, perform turning/repositioning, and administer nutrition supplements as ordered to support healing. V26 stated that failure to implement these interventions could impact functional status, wound healing, and overall health, including delayed healing, disease exacerbation, and increased risk of infection. R123's Kardex dated 1/8/2026, provided by V2 DON (Director of Nursing) showed that R123 requires total assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were seen by Podiatry for foot care needs.This applies to 1 resident (R10) reviewed for podiatry services in a sample of 28 residents.The findings include:One 1/6/26 at 12:11 PM, R10 said she asked the facility staff in November if she could be seen by a Podiatrist to have her toenails cut. Her toenails were observed to be long, thick, and uneven, measuring about a quarter inch to half inch above the tips of her toes. R10 said her long toenails cause her pain when her sheet or blanket gets stuck on them. R10 said the last time her toenails were cut was prior to admission, when she was at home and she would have a Podiatrist come to her house every 2 months. On 1/8/26 at 9:38 AM, R10 said she told her nurse again a few days prior that she needed her toenails cut and the nurse told her she had to wait until the Podiatrist comes around again and makes his rounds.On 1/8/26 at 9:42 AM, V13 (RN/Registered Nurse) said when a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide indwelling urinary catheter care in a manner to prevent urinary tract infection (UTI). This applies to 1 resident (R123) reviewed for urinary catheters. R123's Face Sheet shows an admission date of 8/9/2025 with diagnoses including sepsis, urinary tract infection, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and obstructive uropathy. Review of R123's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R123 had an indwelling Foley catheter in place, was always incontinent of bowel, and was totally dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and perineal care. On 1/6/2026 at 10:55 AM, R123 was observed with bowel movement present in the perineal area and V22 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) provided incontinence care. R123 had an indwelling Foley catheter in place at the time of care. During this episode, V22 did not cleanse the Foley catheter, catheter tubing, or the catheter insertion site after removal of bowel movement.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely and securely store medications.This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R125) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 28.The findings include:On 01/06/26 at 10:23 AM, R125 had one container of (nystatin) topical powder 100,000/30 grams and a two-ounce tube of (Zinc Oxide Paste) Maximum Strength paste on the dresser. R125 stated she applies the (Zinc Oxide Paste) herself but rarely uses the (nystatin) topical powder. On 01/08/26 at 9:50 AM, the container of (nystatin) topical powder and the (Zinc Oxide Paste) Maximum Strength paste remained on the dresser in R125's room. On 01/08/26 at 9:50 AM, V24 (Wound Care Nurse) stated R125 did not have orders for medications to be left at the bedside. On 01/08/26 at 3:29 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated medications should not be left unsecured in the resident's possession. V2 stated another resident can accidentally take the medications that are stored in resident's rooms. V2 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide double portions and nutritional shakes as ordered for a resident with diagnoses of pressure ulcer and malnutrition.This applies to 1 resident (R123) reviewed for following diets in a sample of 28 residents.R123's Face Sheet shows an admission date of 8/9/2025 with diagnoses including dehydration, diabetes mellitus, stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region, dementia, and dysphagia. On 1/6/2026 at 10:36 AM, R123 was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated attempting to drink a protein shake that family had brought in. V18 (R123's Niece) was at bedside. V18 assisted R123 as he was drinking. Per V18, she had repeatedly expressed concern to facility staff regarding R123's weight loss and stated that staff were not assisting with feeding, providing double portions, or supplying ordered nutritional supplements. V18 further noted that the protein shake at the bedside was family-supplied because the facility had not provided it, and that a milkshake ordered with breakfast was not provided that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of a resident's AD (Advance Directives) to the ALS (Advance Life Support) paramedics and the hospital during a hospital transfer. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for facility-initiated transfer to the hospital and AD. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed that R1, a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses that includes acute and chronic respiratory failure, fluid overload, congestive heart failure, dependence on oxygen supplement, asthma, diabetes mellitust type 2, chronic kidney diase, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis, anemia, cardiomyopathy, aortic valve stenosis, lack of coordination, osteoarthritis, and presence of vascular implants and grafts, R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 was sent out to the hospital via 911 on March 11,2025 and returned to facility on March 14, 2025. The Social Service Notes dated February 28,2025 showed that R1, an African…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a resident's urine specimen in a timely manner to rule out a urinary tract infection. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care. The findings include: R2's Face Sheet showed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and her diagnoses include history of UTIs (Urinary Tract Infections), ESBL (extended-spectrum beta lactamase) resistance, acute kidney failure, and anemia of chronic disease. R2's 1/21/25 nursing progress note from 5:08 PM showed .writer also spoke to resident's daughter [name] who said she talked to her mom and it was disturbing. She noted her mother seems paranoid and just wanted to let writer know. Writer informed daughter of my own interaction with her and daughter believes she could maybe have a UTI because 'this happens when she has a UTI ' Labs ordered to be drawn in the AM, urine to be collected per NP [Nurse Practitioner] . R2's 1/22/2025 Psychiatric Evaluation progress note from 12:16 PM (written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide personal hygiene to a resident that was dependant on care. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for improper nursing in the sample of 6. The findings include: R1's face sheet included diagnoses of osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, pressure ulcer of right buttock, stage 4, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, other cerebral palsy, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, anorexia nervosa. R1's Annual MDS (minimum data set) dated November 06, 2024 showed that R1 was moderately impaired in cognition and was dependent on staff for all ADL's (activities of daily living) including personal hygiene. On 1/16/25 at 10:52 AM, when viewed through the door, R1 was seen lying in bed in hospital gown. Signage on R1's door showed Contact Isolation. V4 (Registered Nurse) who was in the hallway stated that R1 is on contact isolation for MRSA [Methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) of wounds and gown and gloves are needed prior to room entry. On entry,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve pureed diet as ordered by a Physician to a resident (R1) that has had a recent history of swallowing problems. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for improper nursing in the sample of 6. The findings include: R1's EMR (electronic medical records) included diagnoses of osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 4, pressure ulcer of right buttock, stage 4, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, other cerebral palsy, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, anorexia nervosa. R1's Annual MDS (minimum data set) dated November 06, 2024 showed that R1 was moderately impaired in cognition and was dependent on staff for all ADL's (activities of daily living) including eating. R1's diet order on POS (Physician Order Summary) showed Pureed diet (start date January 09, 2025). R1's weight (in lbs/pounds) history in EMR included as follows: 81.8 lbs (January 16, 2025), 89.8 lbs (December 17, 2024), 88.8 lbs (November 25, 2024), 89.6 lbs (October 18, 2024), 88.6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen facility in a manner to prevent foodborne illness. This applies to 128 residents in the facility receiving dietary services. Findings include: On 01/08/25 10:06 AM V1 Administrator confirmed 128 residents were being served from dietary services on 1/7/25. 1. On 01/07/25 at 10:01 AM, the dry storage contained: An opened one- gallon jar of mayonnaise dated 12/31/24 labeled refrigerate after opening. An opened one-gallon bottle of barbeque sauce dated 12/31/24 labeled refrigerate after opening. An opened 793-gram bag of chocolate pudding and a 24-ounce bag of butterscotch pudding without use by or opened on dates. Two 6-pound 9-ounce dented cans of yellow cling peaches. One 6-pound 3-ounce dented can of sauerkraut. On 01/09/25 at 01:15 PM, V21 (Dietary Director) stated the barbeque sauce and mayonnaise should be refrigerated once opened to prevent the growth of bacteria. Dented cans should be separated and not use because we don't know how deep the dent is or if the can was punctured and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide grooming and hygeine cares for residents who require staff assistance. This applies to 5 of 7 residents (R64, R66, R76, R114, and R125) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) in a sample of 29. The Findings include: 1. R64 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted with severe cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. The MDS also documents that R1 is dependent for eating, toileting hygiene, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene. On 01/07/25 at 10:18 AM, R64 was observed in her bed with contracted hands, fingers curled, and nails about 7 millimeters (mm) past the fingertip, that were dirty with a brownish deposit underneath the nails, which were touching her palm. R64 stated that she wanted to trim her nails, but she couldn't do it alone, and nobody was helping her. On 1/8/25 at 9:37 AM, R64 was in her bed with a dry, crusty lip peeling off, and the resident was observed licking her dry lips. 2. R66 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely and securely store all resident medications. This applies to 11 residents (R64, R108, R74, R120, R37, R43, R72, R82, R5, R287, and R238) reviewed for medication storage in a sample of 29. Findings include: On 1/9/25 at 11:34 AM, the medication storage room on V14's (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) unit was checked in her presence. Upon entrance into the medication storage room, the medication refrigerator holding resident narcotics was found unlocked (narcotics were not double-locked) and the key to the refrigerator was hanging on a hook inside the medication storage room. V14 (LPN) said that is where the narcotic key is always kept. The following resident narcotics were found in the unlocked medication refrigerator: 1. R64's 2 vials of Lorazepam 2 mg/mL oral solution. 2. R108's Lorazepam 2 mg/mL oral solution. 3. R74's Lorazepam 2 mg/mL oral solution. 4. R120's Lorazepam 2 mg/mL oral solution. 5. R37's Lorazepam 2 mg/mL oral solution. On 1/9/25 at 11:41 AM, the medication storage room on V15's (LPN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices that prevent the spread illness and disease. This applies to 6 of 7 residents (R20, R25, R29, R30, R32, R64 and R387) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 29. Findings include: 1. R32 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that includes Parkinson's, dementia, congestive heart failure, arthritis, left artificial hip joint and dysphagia. R32 physician's orders includes hospice care services and enhanced barrier precautions related to wounds. On 01/07/25 at 04:05 PM, R32's bedroom door had EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) signage. There was no PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) located outside of the room or anywhere nearby for entering R32's bedroom. V17 Hospice CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was bathing R32 without wearing an isolation gown. V17 had thrown soiled linens on the floor near R32's bed. V17 stated there was no isolation gown available for her use. V17 stated she informed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect residents' privacy. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R61 and R32) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 29. Findings include: 1. R61 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that includes effusion of the left knee, poly-osteoarthritis, acute kidney disease, dysphagia, anemia, hypertension, gout, and pulmonary edema. R 61's current care plan states he has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit related to impaired gait and requires substantial staff assistance with transfers, bed mobility, and toileting. R61's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/5/25 shows he is cognitively intact. On 01/07/25 at 12:21 PM, R61's urine collection bag was hanging on the right side of his bed visible to the hallway. On 01/07/25 at 12:44 PM, V23 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and a therapist came into room to put R61's pants on. R61's room blinds were left open and visible from the parking lot on the first floor as he was dressed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident and/or their family/power of attorney (POA) in writing the reason residents were transferred to the hospital, and the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of resident hospital transfers. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R25, R108 and R136) reviewed for hospitalization in a sample of 29. The findings include: 1. R108's Emergency Department (ED) hospital record of 11/21/24 shows that R108 was seen at the hospital for Altered Mental Status and Leukocytosis. R108's progress notes of 11/21/24 at 6:12 PM states that resident was confused and unable to acknowledge nursing staff. Resident's POA was notified and requested for resident to be sent to the hospital. Nurse informed the provider and the Director of Nursing (DON), orders received to send to the ED. 2. R25's ED hospital record of 1/3/25 shows that R1 was seen at the hospital for abdominal pain, ascites, and pneumonia. R25's progress notes of 12/31/24 at 4:45 PM states that R25 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide resident and/or their family/power of attorney (POA) written documentation of bed hold policy when residents were transferred to the hospital. The facility also failed to notify the ombudsman of resident transfer to the hospital. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R25, R108 and R136) reviewed for hospitalization in a sample of 29. The findings include: 1. R108's Emergency Department (ED) hospital record of 11/21/24 shows that R108 was seen at the hospital for Altered Mental Status and Leukocytosis. R108's progress notes of 11/21/24 at 6:12 PM states that R108 was confused and unable to acknowledge nursing staff. Resident's POA was notified and requested for resident to be sent to the hospital. Nurse informed the provider and the Director of Nursing (DON), orders received to send to the ED. The facility was unable to provide documentation that the bed hold policy/assessment form was given to the resident and/or the POA upon transfer to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have an accurate MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment to document the functional limitation in range of motion (ROM). This applies to two of the two residents (R66 and R64) reviewed for assessment accuracy in a sample of 29. The Findings include: 1. R66 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted with an admitting diagnosis, including cerebral infraction and hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side. On 01/07/25 at 12:03 PM, R66 was observed with his contracted right hand, third and fourth fingers curled and touching his palm. A review of R66's MDS dated [DATE] documented no impairment with functional limitation in range of motion. 2. On 01/07/25 at 10:18 AM, R64 was observed in her bed with contracted hands, fingers curled and touching her palm. A review of R64's MDS dated [DATE] documented no impairment with functional limitation in range of motion. On 01/08/25 at 9:59 AM, V8 (MDS Coordinator) stated, The hand contracture is coded in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a physician's order for 1 of 1 residents (R239) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 29. The findings include: R239 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]th, 2024, with diagnoses including mechanical complications of nephrostomy catheter, calculus of kidney, hydronephrosis with ureteral stricture, urinary tract infection, and urge incontinence. On 1/7/25 at 2:11 PM, V9 (R239's daughter) said that she had concerns with the staff not changing the dressing to R239's nephrostomy every day. V9 turned R239 on her side and exposed R239's dressing to her nephrostomy. The date on the adhesive dressing showed 1/2/25 (five days earlier). V9 said, See, they are not changing it every day. On 1/8/25 at 12:04 PM, V6 (Wound Nurse) was preparing to provide wound care for R239. V6 turned R239 on her side, pulled down R239's pants, and opened her brief. Two adhesive dressings were present, one on the coccyx area and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have fall interventions in place for 2 of 5 residents (R3 & R94) who are at risk for falls in a sample of 29. The findings include: 1. On 01/7/25 at 11:25 AM, R3 was in her room and stated she had a concern with her bed moving when she tries to get into her bed from her wheelchair. R3 said that she grabs the Halo (specialized safety ring attached to the bed frame) at the top of her bed to pull herself up out of her wheelchair and stabilize herself to transfer into her bed. R3 said that every time she does it, her bed moves. The wheels on R3's bed were unlocked at this time and the bed moved easily when pushed. R3 stated she has a history of falling. R3's diagnoses include difficulty in walking, and lack of coordination. R3's 10/15/24 care plan showed that R3 is at risk for falls with interventions including the resident needs a safe environment. On 01/09/25 at 09:47 AM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said that the wheels on R3's bed should be locked to prevent her from falling. On 01/09/25 at 10:08 AM V2 (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt gradual dose reductions (GDR) for residents taking psychotropic medications. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R82 and R109) reviewed for unnecessary medications/psychotropic medications in a sample of 29. The findings include: 1. Review of R109's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) shows the following diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, dementia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. R109's physician order shows that R109 has the following orders, Citalopram 20 mg give 1 tablet a day for antidepressant, Quetiapine 50 mg, give 1 tablet for bipolar disorder, Trazadone 150 mg give 1 tablet orally at bedtime for depression. Per the facility's Psychotropic and Sedative/Hypnotic Utilization report, it showed that R109 had GDR done on 4/14/24 for Citalopram 20 mg, Quetiapine 50 mg and Trazadone 150 mg. The next evaluation for GDR was supposed to be in October of 2024; there is no documentation that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered, in ordered dosages. There were 28 opportunities with 2 errors, resulting in a 7.14% error rate. This applies to 2 (R51 and R84) of the 5 residents observed in the medication pass. Findings include: 1. R51's Face Sheet shows diagnoses of dementia, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, cardiac pacemaker, hypertensive heart disease, and atherosclerosis. On 1/8/25 at 8:43 AM, V12 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) administered two Potassium Chloride ER (extended release) 10 meQs (milliequivalents) tablets orally for a total of 20 meQs to R51. R51's POS (Physician Order Sheet) and MAR (Medication Administration Record) show an order dated/started 9/10/24 for Potassium Chloride 10 meQs ER 1 tablet orally two times a day (9 am and 5 pm). On 1/8/25 at 1:51 PM, V12 (LPN) said she gave R51 two 10 meQ tabs of potassium chloride, not 1 tab. V12 confirmed that she could see R51's POS showed an order to give one 10 meQ tablet of potassium chloride twice a day, but V12 had a note on the side of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 3 residents (R114) who were reviewed for environment in a sample of 29. The findings include: On 01/07/25 at 11:10 AM, R114 was observed in his bed and the bed control was observed wrapped around the Halo (specialized safety ring attached to the bed frame) on the right side of R114's bed. The wires to the cord were exposed about a foot in a half in length and one white wire was broken from the control. On 01/09/25 at 10:13 AM V2 DON (Director of Nursing) and the State Surveyor went into R114's room, R114 was in his bed, and the bed control was observed wrapped around the Halo on the top right side of R114's bed. V2 unwrapped the bed control and about 2 and ½ feet of the top of the cord was missing the protective plastic covering, exposing all of the wires. The white colored wire was broken away from the control. The bed control was plugged into the outlet. V2 said that the broken bed control was a safety issue. On 01/09/25 at 09:50 AM V2 said that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-04 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve meal at the scheduled times. This applies to all 129 residents that receive food prepared in the facility kitchen. The findings include: 1. During entrance conference on April 1, 2024, the facility provided information that the census was 129 residents with no residents in house on NPO (nothing by mouth) status. On April 1, 2024, lunch service began after 1:45pm. On April 2, 2024, at 1:30pm, residents who are active in the Resident Council, including R51, R7, R26, R45, R50, R93, R95, and R108 met with this writer. During the meeting, R51 stated meals have been served as late as 2 hours after the scheduled time; all the other residents in the meeting affirmed R51's statement. R51 stated it gets quite late in the evening for dinner, as late as 8:00pm. 2. Facility Mealtimes schedule showed that the variable units would receive breakfast and lunch meals between 8:00-8:30 AM, and 12:00-12:30 PM respectively. On April 1, 2024, at 12:55 PM, the meal service was noted to start at the facility kitchen. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve foods in a sanitary manner. This applies to all 129 residents that receive food prepared in the facility kitchen. The findings include: During entrance conference on April 1, 2024, the facility provided information that the census was 129 residents with no residents in house on NPO (nothing by mouth) status. 1. On April 1, 2024, starting at 9:53 AM, during initial tour of facility kitchen, V5 (Medical Records Director) was in the dietary office and stated that she is helping out with the meal tickets as the Dietary Manager is out on medical leave. V5 stated that she does not oversee the other functions in the kitchen. At the hand washing sink, there was a dirty rag inside the sink. Near the hand washing sink, the clean side of the dish machine area had extensive grime, and unknown debris. Two tray racks with washed glasses were stored over this same soiled area. V12 (Dietary Aide) was seen coming from outside the kitchen and stated that she went to collect the dirty dishes stored in the cart. V12 (not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming and hygiene for residents who require assistance with ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R58, R60, R72, R100) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 24. The findings include: 1. R100's Face sheet shows that R100 is a [AGE] year-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include cerebral palsy and adult failure to thrive. R100's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated January 30, 2024, showed that R100 was dependent on staff for ADL care. On April 1, 2024, at 11:53 AM, R100 was resting in bed, she had long dirty fingernails with brown and black unidentified substance underneath the nails, overgrown facial hair which was curling on the chin, uncombed greasy hair, and foul-smelling odor. On April 2, 2024, at 4:48 PM, R100 was resting in bed. She remained with overgrown nails, facial hair, long dirty fingernails, and a foul-smelling odor. V27 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) stated that R100…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve portions for mechanical soft fish as shown on menu spreadsheet. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R16, R72, R100, R103, and R175) observed for dining in the sample of 24. The findings include: Menu spreadsheet for Fall Winter Menus (cycle day 23) for the mechanical soft diet showed to serve #6 scoop of ground baked fish with 2 oz/ounce gravy. On April 1, 2024, at 1:03 PM, during tray line service, the residents on mechanical soft diet received two scoops of ground fish served with a red handled spoodle and R16, R 72, R100, R103, R175 received the same. The same residents also did not receive gravy with the flaked fish. No menu spread sheet was seen in the meal service area. When asked, V8 (Cook) who was on the tray line serving the food, stated that the scoop yields 1 + 1/3rd oz/scoop. This showed that each resident on mechanical soft diet received 2 +2/3 oz/serving of mechanical soft fish. When V8 was shown the menu spreadsheet, he went looking for a #6 scoop and came back and stated that there are none…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices with regards to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of incontinence care. In addition, the facility failed to ensure staff donned full PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) when entering isolation rooms. This applies to 6 of the 24 residents (R26, R53, R58, R59, R100, R104) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 24. The findings include: 1. On April 1, 2024, at 2:57 PM, V33 and V34 (Both Certified Nursing Assistants/CNAs) rendered incontinence care to R58 who was wet with urine and had a bowel movement. V34 cleaned R58's peri-area from front to back then she (V34) opened the bathroom door with her soiled gloved hands to wash her gloved hands. After washing her gloved hands and without changing her gloves, V34 continued to clean R58. V33 on the other hand helped to clean the left side of R58's peri-area. After wiping R58, V33 changed her fecal stained gloves and did not perform hand hygiene. Both CNAs then repositioned R58 to the right side. V33 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide documentation that influenza and pneumococcal vaccines had been offered. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R26, R49, R53, R86, R104) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 24. The findings include: 1. R86's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R86, age [AGE], admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, atrial fibrillation, artificial opening of the urinary tract and urinary tract infection. On April 3, 2024, at 11:20 AM, V4 (IP Nurse) and V2 (DON) stated they were unable to provide documentation of influenza vaccine and pneumococcal vaccines were offered or declined, since admission for R86. V4 stated R86's family requested the vaccines be administered but was unable to provide documentation that the vaccines were administered. 2. R53's EMR showed R53, age [AGE], was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including pneumonia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a resident's pain and provide medication as ordered by the physician. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R65) reviewed for pain management in a sample of 24. The findings include: 1. R65's Face sheet stated R65 was readmitted from the hospital on March 01, 2024, with diagnoses including encounter for other orthopedic aftercare, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, unspecified, acquired absence of left foot, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the skin and subcutaneous tissue, non-pressure chronic ulcer of left ankle with unspecified severity, peripheral vascular disease. R65's 5-day MDS (minimum data set) dated March 7, 2024, showed that R65 was cognitively intact. R65's POS (Physician Order Sheet) included hydrocodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg/milligrams [Norco]1 tablet every 4 Hours as needed (start date March 01, 2024). Physician progress note dated March 28, 2024 (Recorded as Late Entry on April 01, 2024) included as follows: Patient having a lot of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor clinical condition of a resident upon returning from dialysis. The facility also failed to provide clinical documentation of resident's condition during dialysis treatment. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R66) reviewed for dialysis in the sample of 24. The findings include: R66 is a [AGE] year-old male with medical diagnoses that include acute and chronic congestive heart failure, end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, morbid obesity, and type 2 diabetes mellitus according to the face sheet. Review of R66's physician orders showed there was no order for dialysis or for monitoring R66's dialysis access shunt site upon return from dialysis. On April 3, 2024, at 12:42 PM, V2 (Director of Nurses, DON) stated that R66's order for dialysis was not reactivated. V2 stated she would reactivate them now. On April 3, 2024, at 3:02 PM, V2 stated the facility does not have any reports from the dialysis company post dialysis sessions and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the diagnosis and specific behavior for residents who are prescribed antipsychotic medication. This applies to 3 of 5 residents (R32, R72, R99) reviewed for psychotropic medications in the sample of 24. The findings include: 1. R72's Face sheet shows that R72 is a 74 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include parkinson's disease without dyskinesia and neurogenic disorder with lewy bodies, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Physician Order Summary (POS) shows multiple medications which include Quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) tablet 25 milligrams (mg) at bedtime. From April 2, 2024, through April 3, 2024, random observations were conducted on R72 between 9:35 AM through 3:00 PM. R72 was observed in the dining room either sleeping or sitting quietly. There was no behavior noted during observation. R72 was pleasantly confused when surveyor talked to him. On April 2, 2024, at 2:34 PM, V27 (Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was not given Insulin belonging to another resident and failed to follow the facility's policy regarding medication administration. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R115) reviewed for medication errors in the sample of 24. The findings include: On April 2, 2024, at 1:26 PM with V7 (Agency Nurse) outside of R115 room in the doorway, V7 asked R115 what his blood sugar was. R115 stated his blood sugar was 256. V7 stated R115 has an implanted monitor that shows his blood sugar. R115 stated he had lunch about 30 minutes ago. V7 apologized for being late. V7 stated, R115 blood sugar is high, I have to give him insulin. V7 stated she is going to give R115 five (5) units of Insulin Aspart. V7 (agency) looked for insulin in her cart and did not find any insulin and then said the insulin is in another cart. V7 then walked to another cart by the nurses' station and grabbed a box that had R65 name on it and showed it was Aspart Protamine 70/30. Inside the box there was a used multi-dose vial of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide substitute meals with the same nutrient content. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R35, R86, R102) reviewed for dining in the sample of 24. The findings include: Facility Fall /Winter menus (week 4) for Monday showed Lemon Baked Fish as the main entree. Production recipe for the same showed to serve 1 filet of fish with a yield of minimum 2 oz (ounce) of protein. On April 1, 2024, at 12:50 PM, during lunch meal prep in the facility kitchen, V24 (Cook) was seen making grilled cheese sandwiches. V24 placed 2 slices of cheese in between two slices of bread and grilled it. R35, R86 and R102 were served the same on tray line. These residents' meal tickets showed written orders for grilled cheese and V24 stated they had ordered the same as a meal substitute for lemon baked fish. Facility Production recipe for Sandwich Cheese Grilled included to assemble sandwiches with 2.25 oz of cheese (3 slices of .75 ounces slices of cheese). On April 03, 2024, at 12:26 PM, V20 (Vice President of Culinary) stated that you…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician-ordered negative pressure wound treatment system (wound vac) was placed for a resident with stage 4 pressure ulcers and failed to ensure a resident's stage 4 pressure ulcer was covered. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: 1.R1's Face Sheet showed she is a [AGE] year-old resident who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's progress notes showed she was sent to the hospital on 1/17/2024 to facilitate antibiotic treatment due to osteomyelitis and the lack of progressive healing of her wounds. R1's diagnoses include cerebral palsy, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, anorexia nervosa, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, pressure ulcer of right buttock, stage 4 osteomyelitis, and adult failure to thrive. R1's 1/11/2024 Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed her cognition is moderately impaired. R1's Resident Face Sheet showed she was re-admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.2 | +1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.6 | +1.4 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROTHNER HEALTH VENTURES G II, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2013 |
| ARONIN, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| ISRAEL, LEVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BRODY, ZEV | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/20/2024 |
| JAWICH, ZAFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2016 |
| ADAMS VALES ACCUMULATION TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| DANIEL ROTHNER ACCUMULATION TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| KATHRYN VALES ACCUMULATION TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| KIMBERLY VALES ACCUMULATION TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| MELISSA ROTHNER ACCUMULATION TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| NATHAN AND SHIRLEY ROTHNER FAMILY TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| RACHEL ROTHNER ACCUMULATION TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| WILLIAM ROTHNER ACCUMULATION TRUST | Organization | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| EXTENDED CARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2013 |
| ROTH & CO, LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/08/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145901. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.