Prairie Manor Nrsg & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 49% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 130.0 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.41 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately supervise residents assessed as being at risk for falls and in the dementia unit, failed to make sure that fall interventions were implemented for 2 residents (R2 and R3) and failed to have any base line fall intervention/ adequate supervision for a newly admitted resident with history of falls (R1). These failures affected three (R1, R2 and R3) of five residents reviewed for falls/injury. These failures resulted in R1 having a fall in the dining that resulted in a right femur fracture, requiring surgery; R2 had a fall in her room and sustained a femur fracture requiring a surgical procedure; and R3 had a fall in her room and sustained a right distal clavicle fracture, which required treatment at a local hospital. Findings include: 1. R1 is [AGE] years old admitted to the facility on [DATE], past medical history includes, but not limited to other specified sepsis, fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur subsequent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to prevent an incident of resident-to-resident physical assault. This affected two of three residents (R1, R2) reviewed for physical abuse. This failure resulted in R2 attacking R1 unprovoked with a belt to R1's leg. R1 being a severely cognitive resident it is reasonable to conclude this resulted in R1 suffering psychological feelings of fear after being attacked by R2. The Findings include: R1 has diagnosis including but not limited to Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Weakness. R1's cognitive assessment dated [DATE] is a 6, severely impaired. R2 has diagnosis including but not limited to Unspecified Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease. R2's cognitive assessment dated [DATE] is a 0, severely impaired. On 8/15/23 at 10:49AM R1 observed in the dining room but did not provide statement. On 8/15/23 at 11:28AM V1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), said during the night shift in the morning hours, V7,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to honor the residents' right to choose to be a resident of the facility by not honoring the residents' request to return home after completion of rehabilitation therapy. This failure applied to one of one (R93) resident reviewed for resident rights and has resulted in R93 suffering extreme stress and feeling symptoms of depression due to not being able to discharge from the facility. Findings include: R93 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of but not limited to benign neoplasm of meninges, late on set of Dementia history of UTI Urinary tract infection, Hallucinations and Hard of Hearing. On 08/22/2022 surveyor observed R93 sitting up in her chair making phone calls. R93 was able to communicate to the surveyor and make needs and concerns known. R93 has a hearing deficit and when communicating with R93 you must speak directly in her ear. On 08/22/2022 at 12:00pm during resident interview,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-08-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to keep a resident free from mental abuse by not providing the resident with an explanation of why the facility is requesting a court appointed guardian for the resident. This failure applied to one of one (R93) resident reviewed for mental abuse and has resulted in R93 suffering extreme stress and feeling symptoms of depression due to not being able to discharge from the facility. Findings include: R93 is an [AGE] year old female admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of but not limited to benign neoplasm of meninges, late on set of Dementia history of UTI Urinary tract infection, Hallucinations and Hard of Hearing. On 08/22/2022 surveyor observed R93 sitting up in her chair making phone calls. R93 was able to communicate to the surveyor and make needs and concerns known. R93 has a hearing deficit and when communicating with R93 you have to speak directly in her ear. On 08/22/2022 at 12:00pm during resident interview,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-08-25 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their policy by not completing a comprehensive assessment after a resident's change in medical condition and when adding new diagnoses' to residents' plan of care. This failure applied to one of one (R93) residents reviewed for comprehensive assessment and has resulted in R93 being deemed unfit to make decisions without thorough documentation that the physician verified or reconsider underlying causes of cognitive impairment (including recent urinary tract infection, known to cause delirium) and/or failing to include diagnostic tests and collaboration with other physician specialists (such as neurology) when giving the resident a new diagnosis of dementia. Findings include: R93 is an [AGE] year old female admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of but not limited to benign neoplasm of meninges, late on set of Dementia history of UTI Urinary tract infection, Hallucinations and Hard of Hearing. On 08/22/2022…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow its enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) policy and don appropriate PPE (personal protective equipment) prior to entering an EBP resident room to provide direct resident care and failed to perform hand hygiene before exiting a resident's room after providing direct resident care. These failures affected four residents (R2, R3, R4, and R5) out of five residents reviewed for infection control in a sample of 6. Findings include: On 12/18/25 at 11:04 AM, V10 CNA (certified nurse aide) was observed entering R3's EBP room and rearranging R3's personal items on bedside table. V10 then exited R3's room with R3's water pitcher and placed it on the counter at the nurses' station. V10 was then observed placing the mechanical lift device in the tub room and return to the nurses' station to wash hands. V10 then filled R3's water pitcher and brought into R3's room. On 12/18/25 at 11:25 AM, V6 CNA entered R2's EBP room to provide incontinence care. V6 did not don a gown prior to entering R2's room. At 11:31 AM, V6…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to have the low air loss mattress at the correct weight setting for one resident (R2) with a stage 4 pressure ulcer, who is at risk for skin breakdown and requires extensive assistance with turning/repositioning, out of three residents reviewed for wound management in a sample of 6. Findings include:On 12/19/25 at 8:55 AM, this surveyor observed V3 (wound care nurse) provide wound care treatment for R2's sacral pressure ulcer. R2 was observed to have a low air loss mattress with the weight setting at 400 pounds. On 12/19/25 at 9:05 AM, V3 stated that the weight on R2's low air loss mattress is locked and V3 does not know how to unlock it to adjust the weight setting. V3 stated that the machine is set for a person weighing 400 pounds. V3 stated that she knows R2 does not weigh 400 pounds but would have to check R2's medical record to know what R2's current weight is. V3 stated that the weight setting on the mattress should be checked daily. V3 stated that she will have to ask maintenance to come fix the weight…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement effective fall interventions related to the root cause of a resident with multiple falls. This affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R1 having six falls in six months with no change in fall interventions. Findings Include: R1 is an [AGE] year old with the following diagnosis: Parkinson's disease, functional quadriplegia, difficulty in walking, and orthostatic hypotension. A Plan of Care note dated [DATE] documents the nurse was called to R1's room by another staff member. The nurse observed R1 on the floor sitting in front of the wheelchair. R1 was assisted back to the wheelchair. The Care Plan dated [DATE] documents R1 is a high fall risk related to diagnosis of Parkinsonism, weakness, syncope, depression, and coronary artery disease. Interventions were added after each fall. The following interventions were documented on [DATE]: anticipate and meet R1's needs, follow facility fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and monitor for pressure ulcers for a resident who is at high risk for pressure ulcers. This deficiency affects one (R2) of three residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcer Prevention Program. Findings include: On 2/13/25 at 11:25 AM, V4 (Wound Care Nurse) said that R2 was sent to the hospital on 1/24/25 for change in condition, R2 was observed unresponsive and abnormal vital signs. V4 said R2 only had scar tissue to the sacral area but no open skin. When R2 returned to the facility on 1/31/25, R2 returned with an unstageable wound that the hospital did debridement. V4 said that R2's son and husband were made aware of resident change of condition and hospital transfer. V4 said that R2's wound care is done weekly, and measurements are also done on a weekly basis and weekly wound rounds with MD. On 2/13/25 at 1:45PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said that weekly skin assessments are completed during wound care treatments and are documented on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor and record daily freezer and refrigerator temperatures for food safety. This deficiency may potentially affect all 123 residents receiving food from the facility. Findings include: On 7/9/2024 at 10:02AM, Rounds made to kitchen with V5 Dietary Manager (DM). Observed Freezer and Cooler/Refrigerator temperature were not monitored today. V5 said that the cook should monitor and record the temperature today at 5am. It was not done because they were short this morning. V5 read the current temperature of freezer at -3F (Fahrenheit) and Cooler/Refrigerator at 32F. Daily Freezer/Refrigerator temperature log July 2024. No temperature recording made for 7/9/24. Instruction: This log will be maintained for each refrigerator and freezer (both walk in and reach in units) in the facility. A designated food service employee will record the time, air temperature and their initials. The food service supervisor for each facility will verify that the food service employees have taken the required temperatures by visually…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure coordinated care was implemented by failure to document hospice services rendered to resident's medical record that is available and accessible to interdisciplinary team (IDT). This deficiency affects two (R22 and R45) of three residents in the sample of 25 reviewed for Hospice care Management. Findings include: On 7/9/2024 at 11:00AM, V8 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) and V9 LPN said that R22 and R45 are both on hospice care. V9 showed the hospice binder/charts for both residents. Reviewed both hospice binder charts with V9. Noted no documents found for R22. The folder is empty, only visits log from 6/12/24 to 7/4/24. No IDT progress notes found. Noted R45 hospice documents in binder but missing IDT progress notes. Noted R45's hospice visit log from 6/10/24 to 7/9/24. V9 said usually when hospice care staff comes to visit hospice resident, they document in the hospice binder. V9 said that usually Social Services coordinate with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed the facility failed to supervise and monitor a resident with a history of aggression and agitation to prevent a resident to resident assault. This affected 2 of 3 (R2, R1) resident reviewed for supervison. This failure resulted in R2 wandering into R1's room and physically assaulting R1 with a belt. The Findings include: R1 has diagnosis including but not limited to Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Weakness. R1's cognitive assessment dated [DATE] is a 6, severely impaired. R2 has diagnosis including but not limited to Unspecified Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease. R2's cognitive assessment dated [DATE] is a 0, severely impaired On 8/15/23 at 10:49AM R1 observed in the dining but did not provide statement. On 8/15/23 at 11:28AM V1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), said V7, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), called me I was passing medications. V1 said R2 was in the room of another patient. V1 said R2 was agitated. V1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain dignity and respect during dining observation for one of one resident (R99) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 25. Findings include: On 8/1/2023 at 12:15pm V20 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) was observed standing over R99 assisting with feeding a meal. On 8/1/2023 at 12:18pm V20 said we don't have any chairs in this dining room, yes, I should be sitting down while assisting with meals. On 8/1/2023 at 2:30pm V3 (Director of Nursing-DON) said I expect all staff to respect the residents and have a seat while assisting with meals. A Care-plan dated 10/31/2022 R99 requires a mechanical soft diet. Facility Policy: Resident Rights Protocol for all Nursing Procedures 1. Prior to having direct-care responsibilities for residents, staff have appropriate in-service training on resident rights including: a. Resident dignity and respect:

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the call light was within reach for one (R70) out of seven residents reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 25. Findings Include: On 08/02/23 at 11:15 AM, R70 was observed sitting in her wheelchair. Her call light was on the floor and not within her reach. On 8/2/2023 at 11:20 AM, V24 (CNA) observed that R70 call light was on the floor and not within the reach of R70. V24 said that the call light should be within R70's reach. On 8/2/2023 at 11:22 AM, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said that call light should be within R70 reach. On 8/3/2023 at 12:00 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) said that the call light within the resident's reach. R70 is an 86 years female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis not limited to acute or chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, difficulty in walking, major depressive disorder, and acute kidney failure. R70 care plan dated 6/20/2022 documents: Keep call light in reach at all times.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop individualized comprehensive care plan to resident to meet his medical, nursing, and physiological needs in the facility. This deficiency affects one (R232) of three residents in the sample of 25 reviewed for Resident's comprehensive care plan. Findings include: On 8/1/23 at 10:50am, V15 LPN and V16 LPN said that R232's has indwelling catheter, biliary drainage, and on contact isolation for Clostridium difficile (C. Diff) infection. Observed R232's lying in bed. On 8/2/23 at 12:33pm, Review R232's medical record with V5 MDS (Minimum Data Set)/Care plan Coordinator. R232 is admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis listed in part but not limited to Calculus of gallbladder status post cholecystectomy, Urinary retention, Diabetes Mellitus type 2, Clostridium Difficile colitis. Physician order sheet indicated: Insulin lispro 4 units subcutaneous with meals four times a day to manage blood glucose. Heparin solution 5,000 units subcutaneous three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL