South Shore Rehabilitation
2425 East 71st Street, Chicago, IL 60649 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 248 certified beds · (773) 721-5000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $480,663 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 99.5% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.4% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.4% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.7% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.0% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 42.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.5% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 0.0% | 13.9% | 12.0% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.56 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.00 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 14.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 51% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.3%CMS range 26.4–51.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.4–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 14.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 9.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 9.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.1–15.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.16 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 248 beds and averages 192.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor, identify and intervene promptly for one resident (R2) who was responsive but became unresponsive. This failure resulted in R2 being sent to the hospital and led the R2's death.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor, identify and intervene promptly for one resident (R2) who was responsive but became unresponsive. This failure resulted in R2 being sent to the hospital and led the R2's death.Findings include:The immediate jeopardy began on [DATE], when R2 had a change of condition was not immediately addressed. The administrator, Director of Nursing, and Regional Nurse Consultant were notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 2:08pm.An abatement plan was provided on [DATE] at 4:23pm. This plan was sent back for corrections.An abatement plan was provided on [DATE] at 11:56am. This plan was sent back for corrections.An abatement plan was provided on [DATE] at 3:10pm. This plan was accepted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy by failing to ensure resident was safe from abuse by failing to immediately report an allegation of sexual abuse made by R4 regarding employee (V23/CNA); facility failed to protect R4 from additional abuse/trauma by allowing V23 to continue to work after R4 reported the allegation of sexual abuse to a staff member; failed to protect R4 from harm when she initially reported to CNA, prior to incident on 1/11/24 that she did not want V23 to provide care for her anymore. This affected one resident (R4) of 5 residents reviewed for physical abuse. These failures resulted in V23 re-entering resident's room after R4 made an allegation of sexual abuse against V23. R4 expressed amplified feelings of anguish and panic, in addition to the trauma R4 experienced during the alleged incident. This was identified as an immediate jeopardy situation which began on 01/11/2024. On 01/24/2024, the administrator was notified of the immediate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their elopement policy for monitoring a cognitively impaired resident (R2) with severe mental illness, who was assessed to have cognitive impairment, and assessed to be at risk of elopement, failed to have a physician order for unsupervised outside pass, and failed to obtain consent from state guardian to be discharged from facility. These failures resulted in R2 eloping from the facility on 10/10/23. R2 was located at a restaurant 4 miles away from the facility and refused to go back to the facility and facility discharged R2 AMA (Against Medical Advice). This was identified as an immediate jeopardy situation which began on 10/10/23 when R2 eloped from the facility. On 12/5/2023 at 11:45 am, V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing, DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. The facility presented a removal plan on 12/5/23 at 6:02 pm, which was not approved. The facility presented a revised removal plan on 12/6/23 at 1:11 pm, which was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and properly transfer a resident with a mechanical lift device during a transfer procedure for one (R1) resident out of three residents reviewed for resident safety. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a fracture of the right knee while being transferred in the facility. Findings include: Face sheet dated 09/12/2024, documents R1 is an [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses not limited to: Osteitis deformans, chronic embolism and thrombosis, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and vitamin D deficiency. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 08/20/2024, documents R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 04/15 indicating R1 is severely cognitively impaired. R1's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Assistance documents R1 is dependent with ADL care. R1 is dependent with transferring from bed to chair. R1's MDS documents walking activity for R1 did not occur. The activity of walking 10 feet was also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to supervise and use the appropriate shower equipment for one (R147) resident out of a total sample of 36 residents reviewed for falls. This failure resulted in R147 falling out of the shower chair and sustaining a closed nondisplaced fracture of the greater trochanter of the right femur. Findings include: R147's admission Record documents in part medical diagnoses of dementia, seizures, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the right dominant side. R147's 5/10/2024 Fall Risk Screen documents in part that R147 is at moderate risk for falls. R147's comprehensive care plan documents in part that R147 has a potential for falls and is at risk for injury from falls (initiated 10/02/2023). Intervention includes to Anticipate and meet resident's needs (initiated 10/21/2022). It documents in part that R147 had an actual fall on 6/26/2024 resulting in right trochanter fracture. On 7/23/2024 at 1:09 PM, R136 (R147's roommate) stated R136 was in the hallway when R136 saw V29 (Certified Nurse Aide-CNA) bring R147…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to (a) ensure resident safety by allowing a resident (R6) with a history of alcohol dependence out on a community pass without a medical provider authorization/order and (b) failed to complete a community survival skills assessment for the same resident (R6) prior to allowing resident out on pass into the community. These failures affected one (R6) resident out of three residents reviewed. These failures resulted in R6 leaving the facility on an independent community pass and returning to the facility intoxicated. While intoxicated, R6 fell while inside the facility and sustained a right mandibular fracture and chin laceration. Findings Include: Face sheet dated 09/22/2023, documents R6 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses not limited to: Malignant neoplasm of larynx, epilepsy, bipolar disorder, acquired absence of larynx, speech disturbances, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, and fracture of condylar process of right mandible. R6's MDS (Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to do a complete skin assessment and monitor a resident's (R1) skin issue, failed to have treatment orders in place, failed to have the wound physician evaluate R1's wound, and failed to identify a new skin issue for 1 (R1) out of 6 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. Findings include: R1's admission Record documents in part diagnoses of aphasia (communication impairment) following a stroke, right side weakness and paralysis, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol, and epilepsy. R1's 4/6/2026 MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment documents in part that R1 is severely cognitively impaired. R1 is dependent on staff for toileting, bed mobility, and grooming/hygiene. R1's 6/9/2026 lower extremity scans document in part significant arterial stenosis. On 6/23/2026 at 12:44 PM, survey team along with V9 (2nd Floor Unit Manager) observed R1 lying in bed. There was a gauze dressing wrapped from R1's right knee down to the foot. R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control protocol by not displaying the correct isolation sign for two residents (R66 and R143); failed to ensure that Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign was visibly posted for three residents (R209, R210 and R211) who require EBP; and failed to ensure staff perform hand hygiene during dining for three residents (R125, R130 and R190). Theses failures affected eight residents (R66, R125, R130, R143, R190, R209, R210, and R211) reviewed for infection control and has the potential to place all 198 residents at risk for the spread of infection.Findings include: #1 On 08/04/2025 at 12:28pm on the 4th floor dining/activity room, V11 (Activity Aide) set up R11's food tray. After setting up R11’s food tray, V11 moved R11’s wheelchair closer to the table. On 08/04/2025 at 12:30pm, V11 took another food tray from the food cart without performing hand hygiene and set up the food tray in front of R190. After setting up the food in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to empty the lint compartment and lint filter in an effort to provide safe environment to residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 198 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 08/05/25 at 12:42 pm, Surveyor and V30 (Housekeeping Director) toured the laundry area and observed dryer number 1 with the lint compartment that had a large amount of lint visible and not emptied. V30 stated the laundry staff is expected to check the lint traps and empty the lint every two hours. V30 stated the lint traps cleaning is signed off and logged by the staff every two hours. V30 stated that the lint traps should be cleaned every two hours to prevent a fire.On 08/05/25 at 12:45 pm, Surveyor and V30 observed the lint trap logbook with no staff signatures, not completed for 08/05/25.The facility document dated 11/01/2003 and titled Laundry Services Policy documents, in part: It is the policy of the facility to provide and in-house laundry services for linens and residents personal laundry in a safe and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe homelike environment. This failure affected four residents (R3, R19, R20, and R158) reviewed for maintenance of a safe home like environment in a sample of 77. Findings include:On 8/4/2025 at 11:53 am, R19's brown bathroom door was observed with a hole in the middle of the door and another hole below it covered with a white substance. On 8/4/2025 at 11:58 am, R158's wall behind the head of the bed was missing crown molding and the wall had paint chippings.On 8/4/2025 at 12:08 pm, R20's wall behind the head of the bed was missing crown molding and the wall had paint chippings. On 8/4/2025 at 12:13 pm, R3's wall had a large hole in the wall. On 8/4/2025 at 12:48 pm, V6 (Maintenance Director) stated he (V6) is aware of the repairs and can only make repairs with the supplies he has on hand. V6 stated the facility has discontinued their contract with [NAME] for painting supplies and now must purchase painting supplies from Home Depot. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident's (R36) care planned fall precaution intervention by maintaining the bed height in the lowest position and failed to perform a resident's (R36) fall risk assessment quarterly which affected one resident (R36); and failed to secure a resident's (R131) oxygen tank in a holder which affected R131 and has the potential to affect all 29 residents residing on the 1st floor.Findings include: 1. R36’s admission Record documents, in part, diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, dysphasia, reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, mild cognitive impairment, hyperlipidemia, pseudobulbar affect, anemia, hypothyroidism, hypertension, lymphedema, and difficulty in walking. R36’s Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents, in part, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 which indicates that R36 has severe cognitive impairment. On 8/4/2025 at 11:38 AM, R36 observed lying in bed with the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to contain oxygen equipment (nebulizer masks) per facility's policy. This failure affected four residents (R11, R47, R113, R143) reviewed for oxygen equipment, in a total sample size of 77 residents.Findings include: R11’s medical diagnoses include but are not limited to chronic pulmonary embolism, essential hypertension, asthma with acute exacerbation. R113’s medical diagnoses include but are not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pleural effusion, heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation, shortness of breath. R113’s physician order dated 11/13/2023 documents in part, “change nebulizer administration device.” On 08/04/25 at 10:30am R11’s nebulizer face mask observed on R11’s nightstand not contained in a bag. On 08/04/25 at 10:33am R113’s nebulizer face mask observed on R113’s nightstand not contained in a bag. On 08/04/25 at 10:37am V5 (Unit Manager) stated that R11’s nebulizer face mask is not in a bag. V5 stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to lock the 3rd floor emergency crash cart and failed to double lock refrigerated controlled substances which affected R6, R8, R10 and R174 and has the potential to affect the 58 residents residing on the 3rd floor when reviewed for medication storage. Findings include:On [DATE] at 11:23 AM, this surveyor observed the 3rd floor emergency crash cart unlocked with the latch handle opened, and no facility staff observed in front of or near this cart. The 3rd floor emergency crash cart is observed in the 3rd floor hallway positioned outside the dining room doorway closest to the elevator.On [DATE] at 11:27 AM, this surveyor requested that V25 (Registered Nurse, RN/Nurse Supervisor) come over to the 3rd floor emergency crash cart, and upon arrival to this cart, V25 observed and stated that this cart is unlocked. When asked what contents were inside the 3rd floor emergency cart, V25 opened each one of the 4 drawers, showing this surveyor (while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer two residents (R14 and R17) to the appropriate state designated authority for PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Annual Resident Review) evaluation and determination and failed to perform additional screening for one resident (R17) diagnosed with a new mental disorder. This deficient practice affected two residents (R14 and R17) in a total sample size of 77 residents.Findings include: 1. R17’s Omnibus Budget reconciliation Act (OBRA) dated 12/4/20 documents in part, “Screening indicates nursing facility services are appropriate; based upon all information and data available R17 has no reasonable basis for suspecting Developmental delay or Mental illness diagnosis.” R17’s admission to facility was 12/7/2020 and readmission date to the facility was 8/7/2022. R17’s medical diagnosis includes but are not limited to Schizophrenia 1/4/2021, diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, gastro esophageal reflux disease. R17’s Physician order summary report dated 8/8/2023 documents in part that R17 takes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that medications were signed out when administered for one residents (R143). This failure affected one out of 77 residents in the sample. Findings include:On 08/04/25 at 1:00 pm, R143 was observed with a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) to R143's right arm with medication infusing. R143 stated, I usually get my IV (Intravenous) medication around 9:00 am but I did not get it today. On 08/04/25 at 1:25 pm, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN, Unit Manager) stated, I signed R143's IV medication out this morning but I did not give it. V5 explained that medications should be signed out when administered to avoid a medication error. R143's Medication Administration Record (MAR) presented by the facility on 8/04/25 shows R143 has orders for Vancomycin HCL (hydrochloride) intravenous solution 1250 mg(milligram)/250 ml solution administered by V5 at 10:01 am, however at on 08/04/25 at 1:00 pm R143 stated that R143 did not receive any IV medications (Vancomycin HCL (hydrochloride) intravenous solution…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide toenail care with trimming for a resident with lengthy and jagged toenails which affected one resident (R147) in the sample of 77 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include:On 8/4/2025 at 12:48 PM, R147 observed lying in bed with no shoes or socks on, and R147 observed with long (3/4 to 1 inch long) toenails with jagged edges. This surveyor communicating with R147 via R147's Polish communication board in room, and R147 saying that nails are long and wants them cut. On 8/5/2025 at 9:47 AM, R147 observed lying in bed with no shoes or socks on, and R147 observed with the same length (long) and jagged toenails. R147's left toes observed with 4 long and jagged toenails, and the left 2nd toe (next to big toe) with the discolored toenail growing more outwards instead of upwards towards tip of toe. R147's right toes observed with 4 long and jagged toenails besides the left 2nd toe (next to big toe) with the nail…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) were completed for two residents (R202, R204) to allow the residents to maintain their dignity. This failure affected 2 residents out of a sample of 77.Findings include: Findings include: R202 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Syncope and Collapse, Muscle Weakness, Lack of Coordination, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Weakness and Hypertension. R202's Brief Interview of Mental Status score is 6 which indicates severe cognitive impairment. R202 Minimum Data Set section GG-Functional Abilities documents, in part, 02 (Substantial/maximal assistance) and Personal hygiene: the ability to maintain personal hygiene, including shaving. R202's Care plan focus for ADL's dated 08/06/2025 documents, in part, R202 has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit related to muscle weakness and Personal Hygiene: R202 requires total staff assist with shaving facial hair. On 8/04/2025 at 11:28am, surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to redistribute pressure by maintaining the air mattress pump at the correct weight setting to prevent pressure wounds. This failure has the potential to effect one resident (R7) in a sample of 77.Findings Include: R7 was observed lying in bed on a low air mattress with an air mattress pump at the foot of the bed set on Firm which is one setting past 360lbs (pounds). On 8/4/2025 at 11:24 am, V17, RN (Registered Nurse/Agency) verified R7's air mattress pump was set past 360lbs (pounds) on firm. V17 stated she (V17) was not aware of the facilities protocol for the air mattress setting. V17 verified R7's current weight was 150.8lbs. On 8/4/2025 at 11:47 am, V8, WCT (Wound Care Technician) stated only a nurse, wound care coordinator, or the wound care tech can change the setting on a resident's air mattress pump. V8 stated an incorrect air mattress pump setting can cause a pressure ulcer wound to develop. On 8/6/2025 at 12:34 pm, V24 WCC (Wound Care Coordinator) stated R7's family requested R7 remain on a low air…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update resident care plans to accurately identify isolation needs. These failures have the potential to affect 4 residents (R1, R2, R4, and R5) reviewed for isolation. Findings include: Record review of R1's physician orders document an active order for contact isolation precautions. Record review of R1's care plan does not document care planning for R1's isolation needs. Record review of R2's physician orders document an order for contact and droplet isolation precautions. Record review of R2's care plan does not document that the isolation needs were care planned during R2's stay in the facility. Record review of R4's physician orders document an active order for contact isolation precautions. Record review of R4's care plan does not document care planning for R4's isolation needs. Record review of R5's physician orders document an active order for contact isolation precautions. Record review of R5's care plan does not document care planning for R5's isolation needs. On 5/2/2025 at 12:14 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment (PPE) was readily available for use for residents that require enhanced barrier precautions and transmission-based precautions; failed to ensure linen cart was covered. These failures have the potential to affect 6 residents (R1, R4, R5, R6, R8, R9) reviewed for infection control. Findings include: 1) On 5/2/2025 at 10:30 AM, enhanced barrier precaution signs (noting that providers and staff must wear gown/gloves when providing high-contact resident care activities) were noted on the doors to resident's rooms. No personal protect equipment (PPE) was noted to be readily accessible outside the rooms. V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant) affirmed that there was no PPE available for use. V6 stated that V6 would be unable to provide care to those residents due to the lack of required PPE. On 5/2/2025 at 10:32 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) affirmed that there was no PPE available for the staff to use for residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer prevention interventions as stated in the care plan for residents at risk for pressure ulcers. This failure has the potential to affect six residents (R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7), reviewed for wheelchair cushions as a pressure ulcer prevention intervention for residents. Findings include: On 1/15/25 at 11:50am during observation of residents in the fourth-floor dining room, R2 and R3 were observed sitting in the wheelchair without pressure relieving cushion. At 12:13pm, both residents were still in the wheelchairs without cushions. At this time, V9 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) who was with the residents at the time was notified and stated that she (V9) would ask Restorative. V9 stated that residents need the cushions in the wheelchair to prevent wounds. V3 (Unit Manager) also stated that she (V3) would find cushions for the wheelchairs immediately she finishes assisting the resident with lunch. On 1/15/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-26 · tag F0582 — widespreadGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a policy and procedure in place on how to provide beneficiary notifications such as NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) and ABN (Advanced Beneficiary Notice) to its residents. This failure could potentially affect 182 Medicaid / Medicare eligible residents residing in the facility with 2 residents under private pay for a total census of 184 as of 7/23/24. The findings include: On 7/23/24 at 1:10 PM facility provided a list of residents who were discharged from Medicare covered Part A stay in the past 6 months. On 07/24/24 10:40 AM V3 (SSD/ Social Service Director) said she started working in the facility January 2023 and transitioned as SSD in May 2024. V3 said NOMNC was not given for Medicare residents, it is only given for managed care / insurance residents. V3 stated she is not aware about ABN. At 11:06 AM V58 (Social Service Consultant) stated ABN should be provided to residents staying in the building and not covered by Medicare. V58 said NOMNC should be given to Medicare eligible residents within 48-72 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a.) kitchen staff wearing facial hair covering b.) food items were properly labeled, dated, and stored, c.) refrigerator kept clean. These failures have the potential to affect all 180 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 07/23/24 at 9:10 AM, during initial tour with V5 (Dietary Manager) observed V6 (Dietary Aide) walking around the kitchen. V6 had a mustache and beard which was not covered with a beard protector/covering. V6 stated, I got going and forgot to put on a beard protector this morning. I should be wearing one now. I'll go put one on. V5 stated there is an adequate supply of beard guards in stock and V6 should be wearing a beard guard in the kitchen. On 07/24/24 at 9:08 AM, V5 stated beard guard's purpose is to prevent hair from falling in food and to prevent contamination of the food. V5 stated any kitchen employee with a beard or facial hair should put on a beard guard before they enter the kitchen. On 07/23/24 at 9:18 AM, V5 stated all items…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to update infection prevention and control policies at least annually resulting in current policies and procedures dating as far back as 2006. This failure has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The facility also failed to ensure shared equipment was sanitized between each use for 3 [R62, R106, R129] of 4 [R127] residents reviewed for medication administration observation. Findings On 07/23/24 at 02:14 PM infection prevention and control policies were reviewed. Policy titled Infection Control Protocol for All Nursing Procedures was revised January 2019. Policy titled Blood and Body Fluids Exposure was revised August 2008. Policy titled Cleaning Spills or Splashes of Blood or Body Fluids was revised December 2006. Policy titled Exposure Classification or Tasks and Procedures was revised December 2006. Policy titled Exposure Determination was revised December 2006. Policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene Policy had an effective date of March 2020. Policy titled Hepatitis B Vaccination was revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain effective pest control as evidenced by flying insects visualized both in resident rooms and common areas in the facility. This failure had the possibility of affecting the one hundred and eighty-four residents at the facility. Findings: On 07/23/24 at 9:29 AM V24 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated that she tries to have the Certified Nurses Aides (CNA) get food trays picked up quickly after meals so that there are no fruit flies. V24 stated that she saw fruit flies on one occasion a few years ago in the unit kitchenette area. On 07/23/24 at 9:34 AM V32 (Certified Nurses Aide) stated, In the summer, we have seen a fly here and there if there are windows open. On 07/23/24 at 9:40 AM - V39 (Housekeeping) stated, We have little gnats. I let V40 (Maintenance Director) know when I see one so that V40 can call pest control. As surveyor was speaking to V39, a flying insect flew by the surveyor's face. V39 stated, I just saw one. It just flew by your head. It looked like a little gnat. It is only common in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide physician generated diet orders. These failures affected 5 residents (R7, R15, R75, R110, R152) of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition in a total sample of 36. Findings include: On 07/23/24 at 12:29 PM, observed R110 eating lunch in unit dining room. R110's meal ticket read double portions. R110 received one scoop of mashed potatoes, a single portion of yellow squash, and a single portion of Turkey Pot Roast. R110 stated, Sometimes I get doubled portions and sometimes I don't. The doctor requested it because he wants me to get double portions. On 07/23/24 at 12:33 PM, observed R75 sitting in the unit dining room. R75 received a single portion of Turkey Pot Roast, single portion of Yellow Squash, and one scoop of mashed potatoes. R75's meal ticket read double portions as part of diet listed. R75 stated, I'm supposed to get double portions, but I didn't get it. On 07/23/24 at 12:57 PM, observed R15 sitting on bed in R15's room with lunch meal on R15's bed table. R15 took the dome lid off the plate.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: (a) follow standards of professional practice and facility policy by leaving medications at the bedside of one resident (R488); (b) ensure that one medication cart were locked during medication administration; (c) properly date opened multi-dose eye drops, insulin vials and pen; (d) properly discard expired house stock medication from 4 of 8 medication carts and 2 of 4 medication storage room inspected for medication storage and labeling. The findings include: On 7/23/24 at 11:01 AM Inspected 2 east medication cart with V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse / LPN) and observed R94's opened Insulin Lispro vial with no open date. Pharmacy label indicated discard after 28 days. R94's POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated 7/23/24 documented active order not limited to: Humalog injection solution 100unit/ml (Insulin Lispro inject as per sliding scale. At 11:18am 2 west medication cart inspected with V8 (LPN) and observed R13's opened Insulin Glargine pen and Aspart insulin vial with no open date. Pharmacy label indicated:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide privacy and confidentiality for 3 [R62, R106, R129] of 4 residents personal medication administration record. Findings Include: On 7/23/24 at 9:25AM, Surveyor observed V11 [Licensed Practical Nurse] during medication administration. On 7/23/24 at 9:26 AM, V11 walked away from the medication cart and left the computer screen unlocked and displaying R129's personal medication information facing toward the hallway, visible to anyone walking pass. On 7/23/24 at 9:33 AM, V11 walked away from the medication cart and left the computer screen unlocked and displaying R106's personal medication information facing toward the hallway. On 7/23/24 at 9:46 AM, V11 walked away from the medication cart and left the computer screen unlocked and displaying R62's personal medication information facing toward the hallway. On 7/23/24 at 10:02 AM V11 stated, I forgot to lock the computer screen before walking away. I need to lock the computer screen to protect the resident's personal information from other residents or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' call lights were within reach for two (R43, R171) out of a total sample of 36 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings Include: 1. On 07/23/24 at 11:30 AM, surveyor observed R171 lying in bed. Surveyor observed R171's call light on the floor. R171 stated R171 cannot get out of bed without help, and R171 cannot find or reach for R171's call light. R171 must scream for help sometimes when the call light is on the floor. R171 stated the staff do not like when R171 screamed for help. R171 told staff to always keep R171's call light within R171's reach. On 07/23/24 at 11:46 AM, V23 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and surveyor observed R171's call light on the floor. V23 stated call light should not be on the floor, R171's call light should be within R171's reach. V23 stated the potential problem is that R171's need will not be met. V23 then attached the call light to R171's reach. On 07/23/24 at 2:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated, it is the expectation of V2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain physician order for code status of 1 (R109) resident reviewed for advance directives in a sample of 36. The finding include: R109 face sheet documented admission date on 3/25/2024 with diagnoses not limited to Spinal stenosis, Presence of other vascular implants and grafts, Muscle weakness (generalized), Hyperlipidemia, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Bipolar disorder, Solitary pulmonary nodule, Benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, Vitamin d deficiency, Paraplegia, Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity, Obstructive sleep apnea, Other seizures. On 7/24/24 at 10:40 AM V3 (Social Service Director / SSD) said they are assisting resident and family with advance directives including code status. V3 said code status needs to have an order from the physician. Nurses are supposed to obtain an order for code status whether full code or DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) from physician so staff would know the code status of the resident. Surveyor reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment using the CMS-specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process within the regulatory timeframe for 1 (R124) of 4 residents reviewed for resident assessment in a sample of 36. The findings include: R124's face sheet documented admission date on 10/30/23 with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Major depressive disorder, Anemia, Schizophrenia, Bipolar disorder, Dysphagia. On 7/24/24 at 11:26 AM V42 (MDS Director) said V42 has been working in the facility for 5 years. V43 (Reimbursement specialist) said MDS assessment is done for all residents in the facility and completed by IDT (interdisciplinary team) such as SS, wound care, Activities, Dietary, Restorative, Therapy, Nursing. MDS assessment has different sections including demographics, cognition, hearing, speech, vision, mood, behavior, activities, functional abilities and goals, incontinence, diagnosis, health conditions, nutrition, dental, skin, medications, special treatment and procedures,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit MDS (Minimum Data Set) records to CMS system using the CMS-specified Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) process within the regulatory timeframes for 3 (R99, R147, R167) of 4 residents reviewed for resident assessment in a sample of 36. The findings include: R99's face sheet documented admission date on 4/13/22 with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Neuropathy, Atrial Fibrillation, Heart failure, Obstructive sleep apnea, Anemia, Acquired absence of right and left leg below knee, Essential hypertension. R147's face sheet documented admission date on 10/20/22 with diagnoses not limited to Dementia, Major depressive disorder, Essential hypertension, other seizures, Atrial fibrillation, Hyperlipidemia, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following Cerebral infarction, Dysphagia, Presence of pacemaker. R167's face sheet documented admission date on 2/7/24 with diagnoses not limited to Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Asthma, Hyperlipidemia, Hypothyroidism, Essential hypertension, Congestive heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for one (R101) resident out of a total sample of 36 residents reviewed for PASRRs. Findings include: Reviewed R101's 8/10/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment. It documents in part an admission date of 7/28/2023. Under section A1500 PASRR, facility marked 0 to indicate that resident was not considered to have serious mental illness. R101's admission Record, however, documents in part a medical diagnosis of bipolar disorder (onset date 7/28/2023). Surveyor requested to review R101's PASRR from V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing), and V41 (Admissions Director) on multiple occasions including on 7/23/2024 at 3:10 PM and on 7/24/2024 at 9:25 AM, 10:55 AM, 1:43 PM, and 1:58 PM. Facility provided an old pre-admission screening for R101 from 1/10/2021 directed to another facility. Facility did not provide PASRR related to R101's 7/28/2023 admission to current facility. On 7/24/2024 at 1:58 PM, V41 stated facility admitted R101 prior to V41's start…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided in a timely manner for 1 (R109) resident who needed assistance with toileting. This failure affected 1 (R109) resident reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care in a sample of 36. The findings include: R109 face sheet documented admission date on 3/25/2024 with diagnoses not limited to Spinal stenosis, Presence of other vascular implants and grafts, Muscle weakness (generalized), Hyperlipidemia, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Bipolar disorder, Solitary pulmonary nodule, Benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, Vitamin d deficiency, Paraplegia, Acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity, Obstructive sleep apnea, Other seizures. On 7/23/24 at 10:36 AM R109 observed lying in bed, alert and oriented x 3, verbally responsive. R109 stated he is not satisfied with care; he has been wet with urine and feces and was last changed around 3am and he told staff after breakfast around 8am that he needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as ordered, failed to ensure oxygen masks and nebulizer masks and tubing were stored following professional standards of care and facility policy, and failed to ensure residents were provided humidity while on oxygen. These failures could potentially affect three (R18, R63, R80) residents out of a total of thirty-six residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings On 07/23/24 at 10:25 AM R63 was observed lying in bed with oxygen running at four liters per minute per nasal cannula. An oxygen mask was observed on the bedside table not in a bag. On 7/23/2024 at 10:27 AM V32 (Certified Nurses Aide) stated, We store unused oxygen masks and cannulas wrapped in a plastic bag. V32 observed the oxygen mask on R63's bedside table and stated, It should be in a plastic bag. On 7/24/2024 at 8:44 AM R63's nasal cannula was observed on the floor with the oxygen machine running at four liters per minute. V33 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, I will get her a new nasal cannula. I should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to follow provider orders and provide speech evaluation for one resident (R176) out of a sample of seven residents (R31, R63, R106, R131, R133, R176, R488). Findings On 07/23/24 at 10:35 AM R176 stated I was expecting to get speech therapy on a regular basis, but I don't know if I should be expecting that. R176 stated that R176 has had multiple strokes. R176 stated I don't recall getting speech therapy. I have been to physical therapy. On 07/23/24 at 12:41 PM review of the orders for R176 includes Speech Therapy to Evaluate and Treat. Order was written on 5/22/2024. Order for Speech Therapy was signed by V53 (Physician) on 6/19/2024. On 7/23/2024 at 3:20 PM V52 (Director of Rehabilitation Services) stated that physical therapy (PT) services ended for R176 on 6/17/2024, occupational therapy (OT) services for R176 ended on 6/13/2024, and R176 did not have speech therapy. V52 stated that R176 was admitted to the facility for skilled therapy. V52 stated that upon new resident admission, a speech therapy evaluation or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow facility policy and standards of professional practice in the timely education and/or administration of pneumococcal vaccine for two residents (R176, R488) out of seven residents in the sample (R31, R63, R106, R131, R133, R176, R488). Findings On 07/23/24 11:20 AM V4 (Infection Prevention Nurse) stated that resident education, resident consent, resident declination, and resident vaccination of the pneumococcal and/or influenza vaccines will be documented under immunizations in the electronic health record. On 7/23/2024 at 12 PM, the electronic health record of R31, R63, R106, R131, R133, R176, R488 were reviewed. Under the immunization record in the electronic health record, there was observed to be no education, consent, or declination of the pneumococcal vaccine for R488. There was a signed consent for R176 but no pneumococcal vaccination administration. On 07/23/24 at 3:20 PM V4 (Infection Prevention Nurse) stated that upon admission of a new resident, the staff and V4 assess what vaccines the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment by not ensuring the shower room floor tiles had non-skid tape attached to prevent accidental hazards. This failure has the potential to affect 142 residents residing on the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd, floor out of 193 residents. Findings include: On 05/30/24 at 11:52am, on the 3rd floor shower room in two shower stalls the six floor tiles were missing non-skid grip tapes and some were rolled up. V4 (Maintenance Director) who was present during this environment observation, stated there should be a non-skid tape on each of the tiles on the floor. At 12:02pm, 2nd floor shower room was observed with water puddle noted on the floor under the wash sink. The floors had two of the shower stalls with missing non-skid tapes. On 06/03/24 at 10:20am, the 1st floor shower stall was observed wet with peeling non-skid tape and some peeling off. V10 CNA (Certified Nurse's Aide) stated that all the residents' showers are done in the shower room. At 10:28am, V5 (Housekeeping) was made aware of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that urine collection bag was placed appropriately where it is not visible from the hallway for two of two residents (R3 and R7) in the sample reviewed for nursing care in the sample. This failure affected R3 and R7 whose urine drainage bag was without privacy bag and was visible from the hallway to other resident and visitors. Findings include: On 05/30/24 at 10:53am, R3 noted in bed with urine bag collection visibly noted from the hallway. When this observation was shown to V6 (Case Manager), V6 was asked about the facility policy and protocol on dignity and privacy. V6 stated that Urine bags (Collection Bags) should be inside a privacy bag. On 05/30/24 at 11:00am, R7 observed in bed with urine collection bag visible from the hallway with no in a privacy bag. At 11:02am, when this was shown to shown to V7 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), V7 was asked about the facility policy/ protocol on privacy and dignity. V7 stated that it (referring to the urine collection bag) should be covered with a dignity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that inhaler medication was labelled appropriately, was ordered by physician, and locked in a medication cart when not in visual proximity of the nurse and not in use to prevent tampering and hazard for two residents (R4 and R5) in the sample of 8 residents. Findings include: On 05/30/24 at 10:29am, R5 was observed in bed with inhaler medication noted on the over the bed table. Symbicort budesonide 80mcg, Formoterol Fumarate Dihydrate 4.5mcg inhaler aerosol 80/4.5 and Latanoprost (4 tubes) not in manufacturer's package, without a name or pharmacy label. R5 stated R5 uses the inhaler and needs it. At 10:32am, when this observation was shown to V21 LPN (Licensed practical Nurse) and was asked about the facility policy and protocol on professional standard of medication storage, and medication administration, V21 stated no medication should be left at the bedside unless it is ordered, and it should be labeled with name of the patient and administration direction. V21 said, I should get a plastic bag to put…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an elopement of a cognitively impaired resident with an appointed state guardian to the Illinois Department of Public Health. This failure affected R2 wh0 eloped from the facility on 10/10/23. Findings include: R2's admission diagnoses include but not limited to schizophrenia, noncompliance with medications regimen, bipolar disorder, current episode depressed, severe with psychotic features and diabetes. R2's (10/10/23) BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) summary score blank. IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) was not notified of a cognitively impaired resident with a state appointed guardian elopement on 10/10/23. R2's progress notes on 10/9/23 at 6:47 am, V16 LPN (License Practical Nurse) documents, in part, R2 up at 5:00 am, wandering around unit, multiple warnings to not enter other resident's rooms, advised to sit in room or dining room. Perseveration regarding an outpatient pass. Advised to wait to 8/8:30am and speak with social services. Last seen seated at nurse's station at 6:30. R2's progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 152 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 09/21/23 at 1:58 PM, R3 stated the hot food is always served cold by the time it is delivered to her and when R3 asks for staff to heat up her food they tell her they will but then they don't come back to do it. On 09/26/23 at 12:56 PM, R1 complained the hot food is not hot because the trays sit on the unit for a long time before they are passed out. R1 stated R1 can ask the staff to warm up R1's food but they are usually too busy passing out the trays to the other residents. R1 stated if the hot food was hot the food might taste better and cold food does not taste good. On 09/21/23 at 11:50 AM, V14 checked tray line temperatures as follows: Meatloaf 209.6 degrees Fahrenheit (F), Broccoli 150.2 degrees F, Mashed Potatoes 208.9 degrees F, Ground Meatloaf 157.8 degrees F, Pureed Meatloaf 168.8 degrees F, Pureed Broccoli 178…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. Findings include: On 9/21/23 at 1:22 PM, R3 stated the shower heads in the shower rooms are broken and are always leaking water from them and the floors have standing water on them even before R3 turns on the water which make the floors slippery. R3 says two days ago R3 slipped, lost her balance, and almost fell but was able to catch herself at the last minute. R3 stated there is nothing to keep the water inside the shower stall when in use so when taking a shower, the water from the shower stall flows into the middle of the shower room floor and sometimes into the hallway. R3 reports drain covering missing from one of shower stalls on the 4th floor and complained the shower stalls have mold in them. R3 stated there is black mold in the inside of the plastic spout of the ice machine on the unit. R3 stated, It's full of mold, I can see it and I'm allergic to mold. R3 stated, This is where I'm getting my water and ice from for hydration which means I am ingesting the mold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a homelike environment to R3 by not providing privacy curtain in the shower stall. This failure resulted in R3 not being provided with a homelike environment at the facility. Findings include: On 9/21/23 at 1:22 PM, R3 stated there is missing shower curtain in the 4th floor shower room and there should be shower curtains for privacy because when someone comes into the shower room, they can see R3 naked. R3 stated, I should be allowed privacy when bathing. On 09/21/23 at 12:54 PM, V16 (Maintenance Worker) observed with surveyor missing shower curtain in the 4th floor shower room. V16 stated the shower curtain was taken down because it was damaged and another one should have been put up in its place. On 9/21/23 at 1:07 PM, V17 (Certified Nursing Assistant) observed missing shower curtain from the left shower stall in the 4th floor shower room. V17 stated the shower curtain has been missing for a while and the purpose of having a shower curtain is to provide privacy for the residents when they are taking a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and provide medically related social services to address alcohol dependence when in the community for one (R6) of three residents reviewed. Findings include: R6 is a [AGE] year-old, oriented, ambulatory male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6 hospital records dated 12/23/2022, prior to admission, documents R6 has alcohol dependence and reports drinking alcohol several times a week and binge drinking at least once a month. Facility Census dated 09/21/2023 documents R6 currently resides in the facility. The facility failed to identify and document R6 had a history of alcohol dependence and provide medically related social services. R6 went out on pass into the community and returned to the facility intoxicated. Nursing progress note dated 09/10/2023 at 6:36pm, documents, R6s' family called. Explained R6 was drinking due to loss of brother and other family members. That is the reason R6 was observed on the floor smelling of alcohol.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent comingling of staff personal food items with facility food items in the kitchen's refrigerator. This failure has the potential to affect all resident receiving oral nutrition. On 6/11/2023 at 9:18am observed in the refrigerator a black plastic bag with food items, a lunch tote and a large bottle of coffee creamer. On 6/11/2023 at 9:20am V35 (Assistant Dietary Manager) stated those items (black plastic bag, lunch tote and large bottle of coffee creamer) belonged to the staff. On 6/12/2023 at 12:02pm V14 (Dietary Manager) stated, No it should not be stored refrigerator, it should be stored in the employee break room. Updated General Orientation Checklist and Acknowledgement documents, in part, during the facility tour-designated areas for lunch, breaks, personal item storage.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the fourth-floor bathroom wall tiles in good repair; failed to replace the missing shower knob in the community shower room; and failed to keep dryer lint compartments free of lint buildup. This failure has the potential to affect all 64 residents on the fourth floor and all 175 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 6/11/23 at 10:30am during the entrance conference, the facility's administration presented the facility's census that shows that 64 residents live on the fourth floor. On 6/12/23 at 10:40am during observation on the fourth floor with V18 (RN/Registered Nurse Case Manager), the shower knob for the right-side shower stall on the fourth-floor shower room was observed to be broken and missing. Wall tiles were broken and missing on the right-side wall of the shower room. Inquired from V18 if the issues were noted on the Maintenance log records for the floor, V18 stated, she (V18) would notify Maintenance. V18 stated, This shower room is the only shower room for the fourth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess one resident (R26) for the ability to safely self-administer medication. This failure affected R26 and has the potential to affect all 45 residents residing on the 4th floor. Findings include: The (06/10/2023) Daily Census documented that there were 45 Active residents in 4th floor. R26's (Active Order as of 06/04/2023) documented, in part Diagnoses: Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Dementia and Dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing). On 06/11/2023 at 11:19 AM, there was a medicine cup with medications on top of R26 bedside table. V4 (Licensed Practice Nurse) counted the medications in the medicine cup. V4 stated, Seven medications. We (facility) are not supposed to leave medications at bedside because we (facility) would not know if he (R26) would take them or not. On 06/13/2023 at 1:07pm, V16 (Licensed Practice Nurse/ADON) stated self-administration of medication must be care planned and ordered by the doctor. There should be education and assessment of the resident. The importance of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer prevention interventions as indicated in the facility's policy, for residents at risk for pressure ulcers. This failure has the potential to affect 9 residents (R2, R34, R40, R44, R69, R77, R82, R95, and R163), reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention interventions. Findings include: 1. On 6/12/23 at 10:15am during observation of residents in the fourth-floor dining room, R2, R40, and R44 were observed in the dining room sitting in the wheelchairs without pressure relieving cushion devices as indicated in the facility's policy. V20 (CNA-Certified Nurse Assistant) was with the residents at the time. At 11:20am, all 3 residents were still in the wheelchairs without cushions. On 6/12/23 at 10:35am during observation of residents on the third floor, R34 and R163 were observed in the day room with V27 (Activity Aide). R34 and R163 were observed sitting in their wheelchairs without pressure relieving cushion devices. At 11:45am, both R34 and R163 were in the same position. V11(Unit Manager)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain shift change accountability records for controlled substances for residents'-controlled medications. This failure has the potential to affect one of four medication carts reviewed, and all residents on the second floor that receive medications from the medication cart. Findings include: On 6/12/23 at 2:50pm on the second floor with V23 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse), during observation of the medication carts, the Shift Change Accountability Records for Controlled Substances shows several missing entries of nurses' signatures. This is interpreted to mean there were some shifts no nurse was accountable or responsible for the narcotics on the floor. The missing entries for April 2023 include: 4/5/23, 4/11/23, 4/13/23, 4/16/23, and 4/30/23. The missing entries for May 2023 include: 5/7/23, 5/21/23, and 5/24/23. V23 was asked why some nurses did not sign the records and if they counted the narcotics before taking over from the previous nurse. V23 responded, she does not know whose signatures were missing, and she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure handrails on the third floor were firmly affixed to the walls and failed to ensure the broken sharp edges of the handrails were fixed. This failure has the potential to affect all 64 residents on the third floor. Findings include: On 6/11/23 at 10:30am after the entrance conference, facility's administration presented the facility census which shows there are 64 residents on the third floor. On 6/12/23 at 11:05am during observation of residents on the third floor, the handrails by the elevator and on the right side of the hallway close to the nursing station were observed to be loose and broken at the edges with the sharp metal ends protruding. Maintenance log for the floor was requested from V19 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse). The Maintenance Log did not show any records of the broken and loose handrails. V19 explained to the surveyor, if any staff reported any maintenance issue, it will be on the maintenance log. V19 stated, No one reported it yet, I will write it on the log now, so maintenance will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for a resident. This failure affected one resident (R106) reviewed for call lights, in a total sample of 66 residents. Findings include: R106's Face sheet documents R106 has the following diagnosis which includes, but are not limited to: type 2 diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure, anxiety disorder, essential hypertension, difficulty in walking, cellulitis of unspecified part of limb, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, history of falling, unspecified osteoarthritis, sciatica, unspecified atrial fibrillation and emphysema. R106's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 5/8/2023 documents R106 has a BIMS score of 12, which indicates R106's cognition is moderately impaired. On 6/11/2023 at 12:00pm surveyor observed R106 lying in the bed, covered with bedsheets and a blanket, alert and oriented. When asked, Where is your call light located?, R106 stated, I don't know, the call light is not in the bed with me, I don't see the call light. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to document the code status for one resident, R337. This failure has the potential to affect one resident in the sample of 66. Finding including: R337's has a diagnosis of but not limited to Dementia, Diverticulosis of Intestine, Heart Failure, Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 3 and Altered Mental Status. R337's Brief Interview of Mental Status is 06 which indicates severely impaired. On 6/13/2023 at approximately 12:00pm surveyor reviewed R337's profile and orders screen. There was no code status documented. Surveyor reviewed R337's face sheet and the response area for Advance Directive was blank. On 6/13/2023at 1:09pm V18 (RN/Case Manager) stated, code status should be on the profile screen and the orders screen. V18 stated, she would put R337's code status in the system. On 6/14/2023 at 2:00pm surveyor reviewed R337's Order Summary Report with active orders of 6/13/2023 that did not include an order for R337's Advance Director or Code Status. R337's care plan dated 2/01/2023 documents, in part, R337…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who depends on staff's assistance for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care and grooming received nail care. This affects one resident (R4) in the total sample of 66 residents, reviewed for ADL care and grooming. Findings include: On 6/12/23 at 11:35am, R4 was observed awake in bed with contractures on all extremities and long fingernails on both hands which had accumulated brownish black substances on the nail beds. On 6/13/23 at 11:32am, R4 was observed awake in bed with the fingernails still long and with accumulated dirt as observed on the previous day. On 6/13/23 at 1:33pm, V26 (Activity Director) stated, Activity Staff usually do nail care for residents and would find out why R4's nails were not trimmed and cleaned. R4's care plan dated 10/17/2015 with latest revision 12/2/2019 states R4 requires assist with ADL'S related to Impaired Mobility, Weakness, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Cerebral Palsy and has ADL self-care deficit, and requires assistance with ADL care and grooming: MDS (Minimal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' nasal cannulas and humidifier bottles were dated for 2 (R26 and R67) residents; failed to ensure the nasal cannula and humidifier bottle were not outdated for 1 (R53) resident; and failed to ensure humidifier bottles were filled with water for 2 (R26 and R53) residents. These failures affected 3 (R26, R53 and R67) residents reviewed for oxygen administration in the total sample of 66 residents. Findings include: 1. On 06/11/2023 at 11:19 AM, R26's humidifier bottle had no water and was not dated; the nasal cannula was also not dated. V4 (Licensed Practice Nurse) checked R26's humidifier bottle and nasal cannula per this surveyor's request and stated, the nasal cannula and humidifier bottle were not dated. V4 stated, These should be labeled with date. We (facility) want to make sure these were changed to prevent risk of infection. The humidifier bottle should have water for moisture. The night shift usually changes them. On 06/11/2023 at 11:21am, R26 stated, I (R26) need them (facility) to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' expired eye drops were discarded; and failed to label opened multidose Insulin with the open date. This failure has the potential to affect 2 residents (R99 and R132), reviewed for medication storage, in a total sample of 66 residents. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 2:58pm during observation of medication carts on the second floor with V23 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse), R99's Alphagan Ophthalmic Eye drops (5 ml-milliliters) was observed to be opened, labeled with open date of [DATE] (5 months ago). V23 was asked for how long after opening the eyedrops are good for; V23 stated I think it should be discarded after 30 days. I believe there is a new bottle. 2. R132's 10 ml multi-dose vial of Insulin Glargine 100 units per ml was observed open with no open date. V23 stated the Insulin belongs to the second cart and they should have put the open date on the insulin when it was opened. On [DATE] at 1:04pm, V18 (RN/Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$480,663 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $147,246 — penalty dated 2025-07-09
- $14,050 — penalty dated 2024-09-13
- $39,312 — penalty dated 2024-07-26
- $126,413 — penalty dated 2024-01-26
- $153,642 — penalty dated 2023-09-29
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-25 for 55 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NATHAN AND SHIRLEY ROTHNER FAMILY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/06/2023 |
| 3401 HENNEPIN MEMBER LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/16/2023 |
| ISRAEL, LEVI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/06/2023 |
| MIRETZKY, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/06/2023 |
| GLEASON, LAUREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| OLADELE, JANET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/15/2024 |
| EXTENDED CARE CLINICAL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/06/2023 |
| EXTENDED CARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/06/2023 |
| ROTH & CO, LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/06/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145977. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.