No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Symphony Maple Crest

4452 Squaw Prairie Road, Belvidere, IL 61008 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 86 certified beds · (815) 547-6377 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)3 immediate-jeopardy citations$409,524 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $409,524 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-26)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1747 Henry Luckow Ln · (815) 971-3030 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
216 S State St · (815) 544-3433 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
190 High Line St · (815) 547-4040 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Fairgrounds Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
220 W Locust St · (815) 975-9621

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.8%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight15.4%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms15.3%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.9%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication26.4%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine80.7%91.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.3%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.6%21.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine43.0%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.1%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit28.7%13.9%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.3%CMS range 40.5–61.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.0–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 3.5–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.61
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
53.4%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 68.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.85 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.61 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.96 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-25)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-20)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were protected from potential abuse when a non-staff individual, who was not screened, trained or authorized by the facility, was permitted to provide resident care including incontinence care, transfers and assisting residents to change clothes for 4 of 4 residents (R4, R5, R6, and R7) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 8.The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/10/2026 when V5 (Non-Staff Individual) entered the building and began providing resident care.V1 (Administrator) was notified of Immediate Jeopardy on 5/26/2026 at 8:23 AM. This surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 5/26/2026 but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training.The findings include:1. On 5/21/26 at 12:55 PM, R4 said that the other day, V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant- CNA) and another man that she had never seen before (V5-Non-Staff Individual) came into her room. R4 said that V4 said that it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor temperatures of hot beverages prior to serving to residents, resulting in R1 sustaining full thickness (third degree) and partial thickness (second degree) burns to her thighs. This failure had the potential to affect 50 out of 75 residents residing in the facility that drink hot beverages and resulted in Immediate Jeopardy to their health and safety. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/15/24 when R1 sustained burns to her inner thighs from hot coffee. V1 Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy on 10/1/24 at 3:29 PM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 10/2/24 but compliance remains at a Level 2 because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. The findings include: The facility's Residents who drink hot liquids form dated 9/30/24 shows 50 out of 75 residents drink hot liquids. On 9/30/24 at 8:25 AM, residents were observed drinking coffee at the breakfast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident with a history of wandering and elopement attempts and a diagnosis of Frontotemporal Neurocognitive Disorder did not leave the facility unsupervised. The facility failed to have a policy and procedure in place to account for all residents after the emergency exit door alarm sounded and no residents could be observed outside. This failure resulted in R1 eloping from the facility at 7:15 PM on [DATE] and was found at approximately 8:55 PM on [DATE] by V13 (CNA) in the rear parking lot of a local business over 800 feet from the facility. On [DATE], R1 was last seen by facility staff between 6:00 PM-6:30 PM. The door alarm sounded at approximately 7:15 PM. The facility began a search for R1 when they discovered R1 missing from her room between 8:00 PM and 8:30 PM. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 5. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] when R1 eloped from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred out of bed in a timely manner and failed to provide incontinence care for a resident in a timely manner for 2 of 2 residents (R23, R57) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 35.This failure resulted in R23 crying and voicing feelings of depression.The findings include:1. R23's admission Record, printed on 9/24/20245, showed she had diagnoses including, but not limited to major depressive disorder, mild cognitive impairment, dysphagia, and congestive heart failure. R23's recreational support care plan showed she is at the facility for long-term care and will attend meaningful activities that she chooses. The care plan showed R23 enjoys visiting with family and friends, enjoys reading books, listening to music, and is interested in participating in group activities. R23's care plans showed she has an ADL self-care deficit related to limited mobility, debility, and impaired balance. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify two areas of pressure until becoming unstageable. This failure resulted in one of the wounds requiring debridement and becoming a stage 4 pressure ulcer. This applies to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for pressure in the sample of three.The findings include:The facility face sheet shows R1 to have diagnoses to include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, stage three pressure ulcer of left buttock and stage four pressure ulcer of the right buttock. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R1 to be cognitively intact and requires moderate assistance with his personal hygiene. The Physician Order Record (MAR) shows an order dated 2/3/2025 for a skin check to be completed two times per week.The wound assessment details report dated 4/19/2025 shows a new area of pressure was identified to R1's left buttock measuring 4 by 2.25 by 0.25 centimeters (CM) and was listed as unstageable and facility acquired. A second wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were transferred in a safe manner for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for safety in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a right femur fracture and R2 sustaining a laceration requiring 21 sutures. The findings include: 1. The facility's Incident Report dated [DATE] shows R1 is an [AGE] year old male resident who resides at the facility for long term care services since [DATE]. On [DATE], at approximately 5:30 PM, staff were assisting resident with bed linen change. Resident was sitting at the side of the bed and staff was going to stand him at bedside to adjust his pants when resident attempted to self transfer to the wheelchair. Resident's legs crossed causing him to fall to the floor onto his right side. Assessment completed with external rotation, shortening and deformity observed to upper right leg. Hospice, Power of Attorney, and Physician notified with orders to send to the emergency room for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a shower or bed bath. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for showers in the sample of 3. The findings include:On 6/8/26 at 9:22 AM, V3 (R1's Family Member) said he visited R1 on the weekend of 5/23/26 to 5/25/26. V3 said R1's hair was dirty and matted, R1's fingernails were dirty, and R1 appeared unkempt. R1's shower task for the past 30 days shows R1 was not provided a shower, bath, or bed bath from 5/16/26 to 6/1/26. On 6/8/26 at 12:08 PM, V1 (Administrator) said staff should be providing or offering baths or showers at least twice weekly to residents. V1 said staff document that showers or baths are provided or offered under the tasks part of the electronic medical records system. V1 said that is the only place staff document providing showers or baths. The task also shows if the resident refused the bath or shower. Facility Shower; Bathing policy dated 7/2025 states, All residents will be offered a shower and/or a bed bath at least weekly unless a physician order to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent cross-contamination of soiled linens for 3 of 7 residents (R4, R5, and R7) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 7. The findings include:On 3/26/26 at 12:38 PM, V14 (a friend of R7) exited room [ROOM NUMBER] and informed this surveyor and V12 (Laundry and Housekeeping Manager) that there was stool on R7's bedding. V12 said she would inform staff that the bedding needed to be changed. At 12:51 PM, the soiled bedding from R7's bed was sitting directly on the floor with nothing under the soiled bedding.On 3/26/26 at 12:54 PM, during an interview with R5 (R7's roommate), R5 said staff usually put the dirty linen on the floor (pointing to the soiled bedding on the floor) and when they are done, they put them in a bag. V3 (CNA) entered the room. When asked if she put the bedding there, V3 said she had to go get a bag. She said she took the bedding off and realized there was not a bag to put them in, so she put them there and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly cool a pork roast after cooking. This has the potential to affect all residents in the building.The findings include:The facility's roster provided to surveyor on 9/23/25 showed 66 residents residing in the building.On 9/23/25 at 10:42AM, V4 (Dietary Manager) sliced the pork roast for the noon meal. V4 stated, We don't normally do cooling logs because we don't normally cook food ahead of time. I did not do a cooling log for this roast but I'm sure we did the correct process. I just took it out of the cooler to slice it and then I'll place it in the oven. If the correct process is not followed and documented, then residents could be at risk for foodborne illness.The facility's recipe for Tender Pork Roast showed, Potentially hazardous foods shall be cooled: a) from 135 degrees F to 70 degrees F within 2 hours. B) From 70 degrees F to 41 degrees F within 4 hours.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a system for tracking infections, failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) into a contact isolation room for 1 resident (R68), failed to wear appropriate PPE for 3 residents (R11,R29,R58) on Enhanced Barrier Precautions, failed to perform hand hygiene and glove changes to prevent cross contamination during incontinence care for 1 resident (R57). These failures have the potential to affect all residents in the building. The findings include:1) The facility roster provided to surveyors on 9/23/25 showed 66 residents residing in the building. On 9/24/25 at 1:56PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist) stated, I only have some infection tracking from March 2025 that the previous IP (Infection Preventionist) did. I started in April of this year with my position, but I haven't tracked any infections. I'm going to be creating our infection control tracking but haven't had a chance to start it yet. I think there is a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer activities. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R10,R15,R28,R44,R48,R66) reviewed for activities in the sample of 35.The findings include: On 9/23/2025 at 10:46 AM, R66 stated There are no activities on the weekend. R66 stated she enjoys some of the activities the facility provides, and she would enjoy activities on the weekend. R66 said she would like weekend activities because they give us something to do. It helps us to pass the time.On 9/25/2025 at 9:06 AM, V18 Activities stated R66 does enjoy attending some of the activities the facility provides.R66's 7/18/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed she was cognitively intact.R66's 1/16/25 Activity Assessment showed, [R66] is a LTC (Long-term care) resident. She has expressed the desire to remain in her room for most of her day. Activities of [R66] choice include, watching her favorite tv shows, visiting with family, reading, doing word searches, arts and crafts, and food related activities. She sometimes comes to bingo, music programs, and the dine in club.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for 2 of 2 residents (R50, R47) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 35.The findings include:R50's admission Record, printed on 9/24/2025, showed she had diagnoses including, but not limited to, anxiety disorder, depression, memory deficit following cerebrovascular disease (stroke), protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and Parkinson's disease. R50's facility assessment dated [DATE], showed she had severe cognitive impairment, range of motion impairment one-sided upper and lower extremities, and required substantial/maximal assist from staff for transfers. R50's care plans showed she was on hospice care due to a terminal condition. The care plan showed the goal was that R50 would receive emotional, physical, and spiritual support during the terminal phase of illness. Interventions in place were to approach in a calm manner and ensure a quiet environment for resident while offering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure wound care was provided in a manner to prevent cross contamination and failed to apply tubular compression stockings for a resident with swelling. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R58, R61) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 35.The findings include: 1. R58's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed diagnoses to include chronic venous ulcer of the left leg, stage 4 pressure ulcer of the buttock, and diabetes. On 9/23/25 at 10:31 AM, R58 was in his room. R58's cotton gauze dressing to his left leg extended from just below his knee to his foot. The dressing had a 4-inch circle of bloody drainage visible on the exterior of the dressing. On 9/23/2025 at 11:18 AM, V7 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) began preparations to change R58's left leg dressing. V7 used scissors to cut and remove part of R58's soiled dressing. V7 then set the scissors down on her clean tray of dressing supplies; V7 did not sanitize her scissors. After V7 removed R58's dressing, she changed her gloves; however, she did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's pressure injury dressing was intact for 1 of 1 resident (R29) reviewed for pressure in the sample of 35. The findings include:On 9/23/25 at 1:57 PM, V12 Registered Nurse (RN) went into R29's room to change the dressing on the pressure injury to the resident's sacral area. V12 pulled R29's covers back and turned her on her side. R29's open sacral wound was not covered, and the dressing was barely attached at the bottom of the dressing. R29's dressing was soiled with drainage and an odor present. On 9/24/25 at 9:54 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated staff should be monitoring the wound dressing to make sure it is intact. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) should let the nurse know anytime a dressing becomes loose or is off so it can be reapplied. The CNA should let the nurse know if the dressing is soiled and needs to be changed. It is important for the dressing to remain in place to help with healing. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a catheter tubing secure device was in place and did not clean the drainage spout on the catheter after emptying the drainage bag for 2 of 2 residents (R29 & R11) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. On 9/23/25 at 1:57 PM, V12 Registered Nurse (RN) was at R29's bedside to change the dressing to the resident's pressure ulcer on her sacrum. R29 had an indwelling urinary catheter with a lot of sediment in the tube and amber urine in drainage bag. The catheter tubing was hanging and pulling to the side; no secure device was in place. V12 stated they use a secure device on catheter tubing, and no one let her know that R29 did not have one in place. V12 stated the secure devices are used to prevent the catheter from getting pulled out. On 9/24/25 at 9:54 AM V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated the facility has leg straps that are used for anyone with a foley. The straps should be in place. V2 stated the straps help stop the pulling and tugging of the tubing. The strap secures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications at ordered times. There were 25 opportunities with 3 errors resulting in a 12% medication error rate.The findings include: R47's electronic face sheet printed on 9/24/25 showed R47 has diagnoses including but not limited to psychotic disorder with delusions, dementia without behaviors, anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder.R47's medication administration record for September 2025 showed R47 receives Hydroxyzine 50mg at 8AM and 4PM, Seroquel 25mg at 8AM, 12PM, and 8PM, and Lorazepam 2mg at 8AM, 12PM, and 4PM.On 9/23/25 at 9:50AM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered R47's Hydroxyzine 50mg, Seroquel 50mg, and Lorazepam 2mg. (1 hour and 50 minutes past the scheduled administration time).On 9/23/25 at 10:25AM, V5 stated there is no reason why she is administering medications late other than she is a newer nurse still trying to learn the process. During the medication observation, 2 other nurses were observed completed with their medication pass and available to assist V5. V5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered to a resident newly admitted to the facility. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 6. The findings include: R1's Progress Notes and Face Sheet show that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 3:00PM. R1's diagnoses include Diabetes Mellitus, Malnutrition, Hodgkin's Lymphoma, Chronic Gout, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) and Weakness. R1's Medication Administration Record for February shows orders for Allopurinol 300 mg in the evening (for Gout), Atorvastatin 80 mg in the evening (For High Cholesterol), Flomax 0.4 mg in the evening (for BPH), Lantus 12 units in the evening (for Diabetes), Eliquis 2.5 mg two times a day (Blood thinner), Famotidine 20 mg twice a day (Prophylaxis GI upset), Magnesium Oxide 400 mg twice a day (Supplement), Metformin 1000 mg twice a day (for Diabetes), and Senna Plus 1 tablet twice a day (Constipation). This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to attain and/or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident in the facility, this failure has the potential to affect all 64 residents in the facility. The facility's 671 Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 11/18/2024 shows, 64 residents in the facility and a Medication Administration error rate of 31.25 percent. The findings include: 1. On 11/19/24 at 9:55 AM, R29 said, I waited 2.5 hours to get help changing my incontinent brief. (R45) was watching the clock to confirm how long it took. The afternoon shift and the weekend shifts are the hardest on the residents. On 11/20/24 at 8:25 AM, R29 said, The other night (11/18/24 evening shift) when I was lying in bed incontinent of urine and stool, I felt like the facility kind of forgotten us. I need help. I need help getting out of bed and into bed. I need help moving around in bed. I wish I could do it on my own. On 11/20/24 at 8:26 AM, R45 said, On Monday evening (11/18/24) (R29) waited from 6:30 PM, to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure opened, multi-dose insulin bottles and insulin pens were labeled with expiration dates for 4 of 4 residents (R3, R1, R29, R169) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 16. The findings include: R3's physician order dated 10/25/24 showed R3 received 26 units of Lantus insulin, subcutaneously once a day. R1's physician order dated 5/23/23 showed R1 received 10 units of Aspart insulin, subcutaneously twice a day. R29's physician order dated 8/21/24 showed R29 received 40 units of Lantus insulin, subcutaneously once a day. R169's physician order dated 10/11/24 showed R169 received 6 units of Lispro insulin, subcutaneously three times a day. On 11/18/24 at 9:55 AM, the facility's 100 wing medication cart was reviewed with V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN). The following medication insulin pens/bottles were found opened with no expiration dates: one (1) Lantus insulin pen for R3, one Aspart insulin pen for R1, one bottle of Lantus insulin for R29, and one Lispro insulin pen for R169. V6 (LPN) stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in a contact isolation room, failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a pressure injury, and failed to change gloves during incontinence care in a manner to prevent cross contamination. This failure applies to 4 of 4 residents (R116, R36, R39, R57) reviewed for infection control. The findings include: The Resident Census and Condition Form (CMS 671) shows there are 64 residents residing in the facility. 1. On 11/18/24 9:26 AM, R116 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room. There was a contact isolation sign on R116's door. V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) entered the room without donning PPE and stood at R116's side. R116 said she needed to go to the bathroom and needed her pants changed due to being incontinent. V12 asked R116 how she transferred and R116 said this was her first time up in the wheelchair. V12 left the room, without hand washing, and got V11 (Restorative Aid). V11 donned gloves and V12 (CNA) did not don any PPE.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) care in a dignified manner for 1 of 3 residents (R44) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 64. The findings include: On 11/19/24 at 1:30 PM, R44's room door was open. R44 was laying on her right side as V5 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) was providing peri-care. R44's buttock and posterior thighs were visible from the hallway. At 1:34 PM, R44 was sitting in a shower chair with her pants around her knees. R44's buttock was visible as V5 (CNA) pushed R44 down the hallway in a wheeled shower chair. Every eight to ten feet a drop of fecal matter fell from R44 onto the hallway floor. On 11/20/24 at 12:23 PM, V17 (CNA) said, prior to providing peri-care, I will wash my hands, don appropriate PPE-Personal Protective Equipment, and close the resident's room door to provide privacy. The facility's Incontinence Care policy revision 05/2024 shows, provide privacy for the resident.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for residents that require staff assistance for incontinence care/toileting for 3 of 16 residents (R21, R1, R40) reviewed for ADLs in the sample of 16. The findings include: 1. R21's current care plan showed R21 required the extensive assistance of staff for toileting, transferring and repositioning. The care plan showed R21 was incontinent of urine and stool. On 11/18/24 at 9:07 AM, R21 was asleep in her wheelchair in her room. On 11/18/24 at 10:36 AM, R21 remained seated in her wheelchair. R21 stated, I have to pee. No one has come. On 11/18/24 at 11:40 AM, V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V7(CNA) transferred R21 into bed from her wheelchair. The pad on the seat of R21's wheelchair was wet with urine. The groin area of R21's pants was wet with urine. V5 and V7 removed R21's saturated incontinence brief. V7 (CNA) stated she had last changed R21's incontinence brief at 7:00 AM that morning. 2. R1's current care plan showed R1's is completely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete weekly wound assessments on a resident's pressure injury. The facility failed to ensure pressure treatments and pressure relieving interventions were in place. These failures apply to 2 of 5 residents (R36, R31) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 16. The findings include: 1. R36's current care plan showed R36 was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to her history of pressure injuries and diagnoses of decreased mobility, incontinence, and dementia. The care plan showed R36 had been under hospice care since October 2023. R36's Wound Assessment reports dated 9/4/24-11/15/24 were reviewed. R36's report dated 9/4/24 showed R36 had developed a new unstageable pressure injury to her sacral area measuring 2 cm (centimeters) x 1.5 cm x 0.1 cm. The report showed only one weekly wound assessment was completed on R36's pressure injury in October 2024. R36's physician order dated 9/6/24 showed R36's sacral pressure injury was to be cleansed with Dakin's solution (wound antiseptic) with Thera…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident, with a history of significant weight loss, received weight loss interventions as ordered. The facility failed to monitor this resident's weights as directed by the dietician. These failures apply to 1 of 3 residents (R21) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 16. The findings include: R21's Dietician assessment dated [DATE] showed R21 was at risk for malnutrition related to her diagnoses of dementia and dysphagia. R21's Weights and Vitals Summary showed R21 weighed 126.4 pounds (lbs) on 5/1/24 and dropped to 117.2 lbs on 6/4/24. This showed R21 sustained 7.28 % (9.2 lbs) in one month. R21's nutrition note dated 6/18/24 showed R21 was evaluated by V9 (Registered Dietitian/RD) for significant weight loss. The notes showed R21 was to receive supercereal at breakfast due to weight loss. The note showed V9 (RD) requested for R21 to be weighed, once a week, for the next four weeks, to monitor R21's weights. R21's Weights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered by the nurse, failed to have orders for oxygen, and failed to change oxygen tubing in order to prevent infection for 2 of 4 residents (R116, R31) reviewed for oxygen in the sample of 16. The findings include: 1. On 11/18/24 at 9:26 AM, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant) and V11 (Restorative Aid) were attempting to take R116 to the bathroom in the hallway. R116 was wearing a nasal canula connected to an oxygen concentrator, set at 2 liters. V12 went and got a portable oxygen tank to hang on the back of R116's wheelchair. V11 connected R116's nasal canula to the oxygen tank, turned the tank on, and set the dial to 2 liters. On 11/19/24 at 12:13 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said only nurses should administer oxygen and set the dial to liters per the physician order, including setting up portable oxygen tank. On 11/20/24 at 11:00 AM, V2 said there should be physician orders for residents on oxygen that have the number of liters the resident should be receiving. V2 said R116 is on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 32 opportunities with 10 errors resulting in a 31.25% error rate. This failure applies to 3 of 4 residents (R60, R11, R117) observed in the medication pass. The findings include: 1. R60's admission Record dated 9/15/23 showed R60 had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, hypertension and macular degeneration. R60's November 2024 Medication Administration Record showed the following physician orders: Calcium-Vitamin D Tablet 660/400 mg (milligram) tablet; give one tablet twice a day at 8 AM and 4 PM. Carvedilol 12.5 mg tablet; give one tablet twice a day at 8 AM and 4 PM. PreserVision/Lutein Oral Capsule; give one tablet twice a day at 8 AM and 4 PM. Tramadol 50 mg tablet; give one tablet twice a day at 8 AM and 4 PM. Tylenol Extra Strength 500 mg tablet; give one tablet twice a day at 8 AM and 4 PM. On 11/18/24 at 9:46 AM, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) administered one tablet (each) of Carvedilol, Calcium/Vitamin D, PreserVision, Tramadol,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide showers to a resident that needs assistance in activities of daily living (ADL) to 1 of 5 residents (R3) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 5. The findings include: R3's facility assessment dated [DATE] show R3 has no cognitive impairment. On 7/10/24 at 9:20 AM, R3 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room. R3 said her scalp was itching and said she has not had a shower or her hair washed since 7/1/24 (Monday). R3 said her shower days are Mondays and Thursdays. R3 said she did not have a shower last July 4 (she would remember since it was a holiday.) R3 said she did not receive any shower last Monday (July 8). R3 stated I better have a shower tomorrow! The running water is refreshing to me. R3 said what she had done was to wash up in her sink but she was looking forward to her shower and her hair wash tomorrow. On 7/10/24 at 12:00 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing-DON) said she had updated all the residents shower schedules. V2 (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care in a manner to prevent infection to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 5. The findings include: R2's Facility assessment dated [DATE] show R2 has no cognitive impairment and R2 is incontinent of bladder function. R2's medical record show R2 has history of urinary tract infections (UTI). On 7/10/24 at 8:30 AM, R2 was in his room doorway sitting in his wheelchair with strong urine odor. This surveyor requested for skin check. R2 was placed in bed. V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) removed incontinent brief soiled with urine. V4 (CNA) took incontinent wipes and wiped R2's frontal area then applied new incontinent brief. V4 did not cleanse or provide incontinence care to buttocks or thigh area to R2. On 7/10/24 at 9:35 AM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) said residents should be provided thorough incontinence care including their back area, buttocks and thighs to prevent skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse. This applies to 1 of 8 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 8. The findings include: The facility's reported incidents dated June 2, 2024 shows, resident abuse with R1 and V3 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). R1 is a [AGE] year-old male who resides at the facility for long term care services. He is alert and oriented with occasional forgetfulness and confusion. Diagnosis include, but not limited to: Diabetes, atrial fibrillation, dementia with psychotic disturbance, depression, CKD (chronic kidney disease) and congestive heart failure. On 6/2/24 at approx. (approximately) 2:40pm (2:40 PM), a staff member (V4 Registered Nurse (RN) reported to administrator that a CNA (V3) was observed telling R1 to shut up and go to his room. Findings: The facility conducted a thorough investigation pertaining to the allegation of abuse. Based on interviews with R1 and facility staff, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure newly-hired nursing staff received dementia care training and education prior to caring for facility residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 73 residents in the facility. The findings include: The Facility Data Sheet dated 4/22/24 showed 73 residents resided in the facility. On 4/22/24 at 11:23 AM, V3 CNA stated she had received no dementia training or education during her employment at the facility. On 4/22/24 at 11:00 AM, V4 CNA stated she had received no dementia training or education during her employment at the facility. On 4/22/24 at 11:30 AM, the following employee files were reviewed with V9 Human Resources (HR); 1. V4 Certified Nursing Assistant's file (CNA) showed V4 was hired on 2/1/24. The file showed no documentation of V4 receiving dementia education or training from the facility. V4's April 2024 timecard showed V4 worked 4/11-4/14/24 and 4/17-4/19/24, providing cares to residents in the facility. 2. V7 CNA's file showed V7 was hired on 2/12/24. The file showed no documentation of V7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to supervise a dementia resident to prevent the resident from wandering into rooms of other residents for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for dementia care in the sample of 5. The findings include: R1's care plan dated 8/11/23 showed R1 was cognitively impaired due to her diagnosis of dementia. The care plan showed R1 had behaviors of wandering throughout the facility, rummaging through others belongings, confusion, poor judgement, impulsivity, and having delusions. The care plan showed, Monitor resident behaviors . Utilize behavior approaches that attempt to keep resident safe and calm . R1's Elopement assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 was at risk for elopement due to her history of wandering, impaired cognition, and exhibiting behaviors of opening doors or exit seeking. The assessment showed R1 had the ability to propel herself in a wheelchair, around the facility. A Facility Reported Incident form dated 4/11/24 showed a facility resident (R2) threw water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance to residents that required assistance with toileting/incontinence care for 3 of 5 residents (R2, R5, R3) reviewed for ADLs in the sample of 5. The findings include: 1. R2's current care plan showed R2 required the extensive assistance of staff for toileting and perineal cares due to her diagnosis of a stroke (CVA/cerebrovascular accident). The plan showed R2 was incontinent of urine. The care plan showed, Check as required for incontinence. On 2/28/24 at 8:19 AM, R2 was in bed, dressed in a nightgown. A strong odor of urine was noted from R2's side of the room. At 8:30 AM, V5 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and V6 CNA approached R2 and began providing cares. V5 stated, We are getting a late start today getting everyone up. We only had one CNA on the unit last night. This is my first time doing cares on (R2). V5 stated she was unsure the last time R2 was provided with incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain an x-ray ordered by the physician. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents in the sample of 8. On 2/6/2024 at 10:20 AM, V3 Registered Nurse (RN) said on 12/28/2023 V5 Physician came to round on residents at the facility and saw (R1). V3 said she placed an order for an x-ray on (R1) related to (R1) having a cough. V3 said the facility uses two companies for x-ray. V3 said she does not recall which x-ray company she notified of the x-ray order. V3 said once the company is notified the requisition is printed along with the resident's face sheet and kept at the desk until the x-ray is completed. V3 said there is no log in place to track if an x-ray company is notified or not. V3 said it is passed along in report. On 2/6/2024 at 12:58 PM, V1 Administrator said facility staff must contact the x-ray companies once the order is entered into the computer because the x-ray companies are unable to see the order in their computer system. V1 said there is no written documentation to keep track of when x-ray companies have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-25 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve two scoops of mechanical soft pork to residents requiring a mechanical soft diet. This applies to 4 of 4 (R10, R19, R44, R268) residents reviewed for mechanical soft diets in the sample of 17. The findings include: Facility provided Diet Type Report dated 10/23/23 shows R10, R19, R44, and R268 receive a mechanical soft diet. On 10/23/23 between 12:04 PM and 12:24 PM, V15 (Cook) used a single #12 scoop to plate mechanical soft pork. On 10/23/23 at 12:24 PM, V15 confirmed only one #12 scoop was provided of mechanical soft pork. On 10/25/23 at 9:01 AM, V16 (Food Service Director) stated if the incorrect scoop size is used, residents could get a lesser amount of protein or other nutrients required for their therapeutic diets. Facility provided Daily Spreadsheet dated 10/23 shows mechanical soft pork requires two #12 scoops for one serving. Facility Serving Portions (no date) policy states, Food will be served in portions indicated on the cycle menu and on the standardized recipes.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provided pureed pork in a pudding-like consistency for residents requiring a pureed diet. This applies to 4 of 4 (R2, R27, R41, R43) residents reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 17. The findings include: Facility provided Diet Type Report dated 10/23/23 shows R2, R27, R41, and R43 receive a pureed diet. On 10/23/23 at 12:31 PM, the facility provided test tray of pureed pork, pureed buttered noodles, and pureed mixed vegetables was evaluated. The pureed pork was not smooth, was grainy, and required chewing. On 10/23/23 at 11:16 AM, V15 (Cook) said purees should be similar to a pudding-like consistency. On 10/23/23 at 12:36 PM, V16 (Food Service Director) said the pureed pork was not an appropriate texture. V16 prefers the purees to resemble a smooth, mousse-like consistency. On 10/25/23 at 9:01 AM, V16 said if the puree is not a smooth, mousse-like consistency, a resident may have issues ingesting the food. Facility Guidelines for Pureed Preparation policy (no date) states, The pureed diet provides food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to handle a spatula in a manner to prevent cross-contamination when preparing pureed pork. This applies to 4 of 4 (R2, R27, R41, R43) residents reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 17. The findings include: Facility provided Diet Type Report dated 10/23/23 shows R2, R27, R41, and R43 receive a pureed diet. On 10/23/23 at 11:14 AM, V15 (Cook) began the puree process with pork and broth. At 11:15 AM, V15 grabbed a clean spatula from a steam table pan, stirred the pureed pork in the food processor container, and placed the spatula onto the food prep counter. At 11:16 AM, V15 grabbed the spatula from the food prep counter and used it to stir the pureed pork again. Once finished, V15 placed the spatula back onto the food prep counter. At 11:18 AM, V15 grabbed the spatula from the food prep counter and used the spatula to dish the pureed pork into the steam table pan and placed the pan into the oven. On 10/24/23 at 1:37 PM, V16 (Food Service Director) said the spatula should be placed on a plate, aluminum foil,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided privacy during personal care. This applies to 1of 17 residents (R43) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 17. The findings include: On October 23, 2023 at 1:48 PM, V3 and V4 both Certified Nursing Assistants were putting R43 back to bed. R43 was dressed in a sweatshirt and pants. She was saturated with urine. V3 and V4 lifted her into bed and undressed her. She was naked lying in bed, uncovered. R20's bed is positioned straight across from R43 and she could see R43 naked. The curtain was not pulled and open. On October 25, 2023 at 9:53 AM, V2 Director of Nursing stated, if a resident has a room mate they should keep the resident covered and the curtain pulled to provide them with privacy when providing personal care. The facility's privacy and dignity policy dated October 2023 shows, General: The facility ensures the privacy and dignity of the its residents. Guidelines: .5. Close door, close bed privacy curtain, and close window blinds or curtain when providing care.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care to 2 of 17 residents (R47, R43) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 17. The findings include: 1. On 10/24/23 at 08:31 AM, R47 was in bed with his breakfast tray on the over bed table. R47 was wearing only a gray T-shirt and in incontinence brief, R47's gray T-shirt was visible wet in the front around the top of R47's brief and around R47's right side. R47 stated I got problems. I'm all wet, and lowered the bed sheet and pointed to his incontinence brief and bedding. R47's incontinence brief was visibly saturated with urine and the bed pads underneath were saturated with urine and visible rings of wetness on the pads extended out and around R47. On 10/24/23 at 08:37 AM, V6 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said she didn't change R47 this am. V6 stated it's just me and V7 CNA and V7 has to help me with the mechanical lift transfer and we had to pass breakfast trays first before getting R47 up V6 removed R47's soiled shirt and rolled R47 to his side to remove the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess a resident and notify the physician after a change in condition for 1 of 17 residents (R168) reviewed for care and services in the sample of 17. The findings include: On 10/23/23 at 11:35 AM, R168 was in bed and stated I have pain from a fall this morning. It just happened. I was trying to get out of bed with therapy. I sat at the edge of the bed and tried to stand. I slipped trying to stand and fell on my left hip. I have a bruise. I fell on the surgical hip that has a rod in it. The nurse she gave me a pain pill but it hurts. It was V9 Restorative Aid and V14 Occupational Therapy trying to help me stand. I was trying to pivot with a walker and slipped. I had a gait belt on. They used a lift to get me up. On 10/24/23 at 11:20 AM, R168 was in bed and stated ever since my feet slid out under me, it hurts. The nurse (V12 Assistant Director of Nursing) talked to me about what happened. The incision was bleeding again. R168 pulled back sheet and on her upper left thigh, there was a 2 inch section of steri…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer injuries were identified prior to an unstageable wound. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R20) reviewed for pressure ulcer injuries in the sample of 17. The findings include: R20's face sheet lists her diagnoses to include: pressure ulcer of unspecified part of back, stage 4 and paraplegia On October 24, 2023 at 10:30 AM, V5 Wound Care Nurse was changing R20's pressure ulcer dressing to her midline spine. V5 stated, she was not sure how R20 developed this wound. R20 doesn't feel anything from her breasts down. It could possibly be from the pad or something else, we are not sure. It was found at an unstageable pressure injury covered in slough (dead tissue). R20 had two very small red areas on her midline spine. There was a scar from a previous back surgery and the pressure injury was just below the scar on the left side. On October 23, 2023 at 1:58 PM, R20 stated, they think the pad she lays on had a ridge in it and she laid on it too long that it created a sore. R20's wound assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safely secure an oxygen cylinder in a resident's room for 1 of 17 residents (R47) reviewed for safety in the sample of 17. The findings include: On 10/23/23 at 09:53 AM, there was an oxygen cylinder, sitting on the floor (not in a stand or holder), under the TV in the middle of R47's room. On 10/23/23 at 01:40 PM, R47 was up in his wheelchair propelling himself around his room, eating peanuts. The oxygen tank remained sitting on the floor unsecured. On at 10/24/23 at 08:31 AM, the oxygen cylinder was still sitting on the floor in R47's room unsecured. On 10/24/23 at 02:25 PM, V10 Medical Records said the oxygen tank must belong to R47's roommate. V10 said portable oxygen tanks or cylinders are for the wheelchair, and should be either in the wheelchair sleeve or a holder. V10 said oxygen cylinders shouldn't be sitting on floor, they can blow up if fall over and hit the floor. The facility's Oxygen Cylinder Safety Guidelines Policy dated 11/14 shows small cylinders should be attached to a cylinder stand or to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided perineal care to prevent the spread of infection. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R58 & R43) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 17. The findings include: 1. On October 23, 2023 at 11:35 AM, V4 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was providing perineal care to R58. He used wipes to clean the front perineal area. With the same wipes he wiped down both of her legs. He set the used wipes on the bedside table and rolled R58 over. He grabbed the same used wipes and continued to clean the back perineal area with the same wipes he used for the front perineal area. 2. On October 23, 2023 at 1:48 PM, V3 and V4 both CNAs were putting R43 back to bed after lunch. R43 was saturated with urine. She wet through her adult brief, pants and mechanical lift pad. V3 used wipes to clean R43's front perineal area. She wiped R43's front perineal area up instead of down. On October 25, 2023 at 11:32 AM, V3 CNA stated, you clean from dirty to clean. We always wipe front to back and never…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record the facility failed to ensure staff wore the required PPE (personal protection equipment) in COVID-19 positive rooms. This applies to 1 of 17 residents (R58) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 17. The findings include: R58's face sheet shows, she is positive for COVID-19 with an onset date of October 18, 2023. R58's order summary report provided on October 24, 2023 shows, Transmission Based Precautions. Contact and Droplet Precautions every shift for 10 days. Start date October 18, 2023 and an end date of October 28, 2023. On October 23, 2023 at 11:35 AM, V4 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was providing personal care to R58. He was wearing a surgical mask, a gown and gloves. He did not have an N95 mask or eyewear on. On October 25, 2023 at 9:53 AM, V2 Director of Nursing stated, staff have to wear a face mask, N95, gown and gloves in COVID-19 positive rooms. The facility's transmission based/contact precautions policy dated August 2022 shows, Droplet Precautions: Droplet Precautions are intended to prevent transmission of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$409,524 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $195,340 — penalty dated 2026-05-26
  • $36,517 — penalty dated 2025-09-16
  • $39,683 — penalty dated 2024-11-04
  • $127,785 — penalty dated 2024-10-02
  • $10,199 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-10-10 for 36 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-29 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SYMPHONY CARE NETWORK — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SYMPHONY HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST99%since 11/22/2011
SYMAG HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/22/2011
SYMPHONY ML LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/22/2011
SYMPHONY MONARCH HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/22/2011
WILLOW DELTA TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2019
HARTMAN, DEBRAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 11/22/2011
MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 08/21/2018
MCAFEE, JOHNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2017
WOODS, RENEEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2017

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-36.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.4M
Related-party expense26% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 9%Other / private 27%

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$363per resident / day
operating cost
$11,045per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$266per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145990. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next