Caretel Inns of Brighton

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 461 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 185 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.76 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 56.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.23 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of a Stage 3 pressure injury for one Resident (R57) of one resident reviewed for pressure injuries, resulting in wound treatments, increased pain and discomfort, and the potential for further wound deterioration. Findings include: On 2/09/26 at 1:46 p.m., R57 was observed in their room in their hospital bed, lying on their left side, directly on the trochanteric (hip) area, with their legs bent at their knees. There was no offloading device behind them, including pillows or a wedge to support their back on their bed. No offloading devices were observed in their room. It was noted R57 was positioned on an air mattress. The bed had no footboard. On 2/09/26 at 1:47 p.m., R57 stated, You can see the bed does not fit my frame . R57 reported they had asked staff for a new bed as long as I have been here, and said staff did not get them one. R57 explained their legs were curled to stay on the bed. R57 said they laid on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2660312Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident-centered intervention which required a two-person total assist for positioning onto a bedpan for one (R701) of one resident reviewed for falls, resulting in R701 falling to the floor, sustaining a left clavicle (collarbone) fracture, new pain and discomfort to their left upper extremity.Findings include:A concern was filed with the State Agency alleging on 9/18/25 prior to being transferred for their weekly outpatient paracentesis (procedure that involves the removal of fluid from the abdomen) appointment, two family members and two EMT's (Emergency Medical Technician) personnel were waiting outside R701's room while they (R701) were cared for by one Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) to use the bedpan. While waiting, R701 was heard yelling I am going to fall, then a loud thump was heard and R701 was found lying on the floor.Clinical record review revealed R701 was admitted to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen.Findings Include:On 02/11/26 at 8:14 AM observation of the kitchen two door cooler found a package of opened hot dogs with a facility marked date of 1/21/26. An interview at this time with Dietary Manager (DM) F found they use a seven-day discard for ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety foods.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (A) Except when PACKAGING FOOD using a REDUCED OXYGEN PACKAGING method as specified under S 3-502.12, and except as specified in (E) and (F) of this section, refrigerated, READY-TO-EAT, TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and held in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the PREMISES, sold, or discarded when held at a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of two Residents (R57 and R77) when appropriate durable medical equipment was not provided to accommodate their functional medical care needs. Findings include: R77 On 2/09/26 at 1:56 p.m., R77 was observed dressed, seated upright in their wheelchair in their room. On 2/09/26 at 1:58 p.m., R77 reported they had notified staff since yesterday (2/08/26) their toilet safety frame over their toilet was crooked and said, nothing was done. R77 explained they felt nervous using their toilet. R77 described they sometimes waited extended periods (30 or more minutes) for assistance with toileting needs, which made them feel scared, being seated on an uneven commode seat. On 2/09/26 at 2:01 p.m., R77's bathroom was observed. There was a toilet safety frame which was worn and rusted at the base of one commode leg, on the right rear side. This caster was about a 1-inch difference in height (higher) than the others, so it did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2677940Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ancillary services were provided in a timely manner for three residents (R6, R20 and R64) of three residents reviewed for medically related Social Services. Findings include: R6 On 2/9/26 at approximately 11:03 AM, R6 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer questions asked. When queried as to the care provided by the facility, R6 reported that they needed follow up with their hearing aid and outside dental care. They also reported that they had been seen by an ophthalmologist that recommended they needed cataract surgery, and nothing had been scheduled. They further noted that they were supposed to see an outside dentist and something happened with transportation and the appointment was cancelled. They were not aware that it had been rescheduled. With respect to the hearing aid, they noted that they were seen last year and were told that they were getting a new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent when two medication errors were observed (R3, R79) from a total of 29 opportunities resulting in an error rate of six percent.On 2/10/26 at 7:51 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C was observed for medication administration. R3 was ordered Miralax (medication to treat irregular bowel movements and constipation)17 grams. LPN C was observed pouring the medication granules into the measuring cap and was asked how to confirm the measure was 17 grams. LPN C was observed pointing to the inside of the measuring cap and indicated the white thread halfway in the white part of the cap cup was 17 grams.On 2/10/26 at 8:18 AM, LPN D was observed for medication administration. R79 was ordered Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) oral tablet delayed release. LPN D was observed preparing Aspirin 81 mg chewable and administered to R79.On 2/10/26 at 10:45 AM, The Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to demonstrate how nurses measure 17 grams of Miralax. The DON retrieved a bottle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake #MI00149608. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dignified care to answer call lights timely for two Residents (R804, R806) of five residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: On 2/05/25 at 12:08 p.m., R804 was observed seated in a manual wheelchair, dressed, with a full mechanical lift body sling underneath them. An air mattress was observed on their bed. R804 was asked if they had any pressure ulcers, and responded, Yes. R804 was frowning and appeared ready to cry. On 2/05/25 at 12:13 p.m., R804 reported they felt upset and angry as they were waiting too long for their call light to be answered. R804 explained they always waited at least 15 to 20 minutes and sometimes they waited for at least a half hour, including today. R804 stated, This morning I had an accident (incontinence episode). I am left wet and having to sit in it. This is happening all the time . R804 further clarified this occurred anytime during the day or night. R804 looked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake #MI00149071. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate professional standards of care related to one Resident (R807) of one resident reviewed for quality of care, when they did not provide a wheelchair cushion for a resident at risk for skin breakdown, resulting in pain and the potential for skin breakdown. Findings include: On 2/05/25 at 2:59 p.m., R807 was observed in their room, seated in a manual wheelchair, and appeared thin and underweight. This Surveyor observed they had no wheelchair cushion underneath them. On 2/05/25 at approximately 3:04 p.m., R807 reported they were uncomfortable and their bottom was hurting when they sat in their wheelchair. R807's Family Member (FM) F, who was present, and R807 reported they had no wheelchair cushion in their wheelchair since their admission. FM F explained R807 was admitted about a week prior with a wound on their bottom, which was the size of a quarter currently. FM F stated R807 had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen, sub kitchen, and dining room counter resulting in the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen, sub kitchen, and dining room counter. Findings include: On 10/21/24 at 9:17 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen, the following items were observed with Dietary Director I (DD I): 1. Dried Food debris on the bottom of multiple refrigerators. 2.Food debris and frozen vegetables (peas) on bottom of the freezers. 3. Food debris on top of the stove and dried splattering on side of the stove. 4. Moderate amounts of debris around entire kitchen floor. 5. Floor mats soiled with food debris and sticky when stepped onto mat. On 10/22/24 at 8:00 AM, an observation of the sub kitchen during breakfast service was conducted and revealed: 1. Back sink next to dishwashers revealed under the sink, a Styrofoam cup, red straw, condiment papers and a white brush. 2. Ice machine grate and basin revealed dried brown splattered matter. 3. Juice dispensing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview the facility failed to implement an active water management plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP) resulting in the potential for water borne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among residents in the facility. Findings include: On 10/23/24 at 1:45 PM, the facility's Water Management binder was reviewed with the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA), Maintenance Director A, and Corporate Director of Facility Management G was present to provide oversite. When questioned what measures were taken to monitor the water, the facility acknowledged only a quarterly water temperature monitoring was performed. The process involved the water being brought up to 140 degrees from the boiler and then let it flow. When questioned what measures were taken for the facility and monitoring for Legionella, the facility stated chlorine residuals are not measured, and unable to provide documentation of water monitoring.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, resulting in the presence of spiders and drain (sewer) flies throughout the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 10/21/24 at 11:00 AM, 3:00 PM and 10/22/24 at 8:45 AM and 1:30 PM, the 200 hallway was observed to have multiple areas of live spiders and webs on and around the hallway love seat, and there were multiple live drain flies observed on the walls, baseboards and more heavily at the base of a door that was locked and marked for employees only. There were multiple (eight) dead drain flies observed on the window ledge in the hallway across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. Review of the pest control logs provided by the facility revealed there were monthly visits with the most recent visit on 9/16/24 which identified only house mice pest type in the main building. The remaining main interior building identified No Activity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable and homelike environment, affecting multiple residents throughout the facility. Findings include: On 10/21/24 at 11:00 AM, 3:00 PM and 10/22/24 at 8:45 AM and 1:30 PM, the 200 hallway was observed to have multiple areas of live spiders and webs on and around the hallway love seat, and there were multiple live sewer flies observed on the walls, baseboards and more heavily at the base of a door that was locked and marked for employees only. There were multiple (eight) dead sewer flies observed on the window ledge in the hallway across from room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 10/22/24 at 2:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director (Staff 'A') who reported they began to work at the facility on 4/24/24. They also reported they had recently taken over as the Housekeeping Manager in August. When asked about their housekeeping staff, Staff 'A' reported they were short three housekeepers and have a few…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SYMPHONY CARE NETWORK — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $729K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI