Accolade Healthcare Danville
801 North Logan Avenue, Danville, IL 61832 · For profit - Corporation · 108 certified beds · (217) 443-3106 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 10 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $67,825 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-19)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 82.1% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.1% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.3% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.3% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.0% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.5% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.10 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 78 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.5%CMS range 35.8–60.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.5–14.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 57.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 4.7–15.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 95.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.69 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, Interview, and Record Review the facility failed to prevent a fall with injury by failing to provide adequate staff assistance during a therapy session for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls on the sample list of three. This failure resulted in R1 falling forward out of a bed and landing on the floor and hitting R1's head on the floor. R1 sustained a laceration to the head which required emergency treatment and 15 staples to close. Findings Include:R1's Emergency Department Notes dated 10/31/25 at 6:15PM document R1 has a laceration and received 15 staples to the frontal part of the head due to a fall. R1's Progress Note dated 10/31/25 documents Therapy informed this nurse that resident fell. She reported that she had resident sitting on the side of the bed and she walked to other side of bed. Upon assessment resident was lying on her stomach with her head turned to the left in between both beds. Bleeding present from head. Resident reported she hit her head on her night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement skin and pressure relieving interventions, evaluate nutritional status, maintain wound dressings, and accurately document wound assessments for three (R1, R3, R4) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample list of four. These failures resulted in R4 developing a stage two pressure ulcer that deteriorated into an unstageable pressure ulcer. Findings include: The facility's Skin and Wound Management Guidelines dated April 2023 documents preventative measures will be implemented for residents who are at risk for developing wounds and aggressive wound management will be initiated for wounds/pressure ulcers. This guide documents to complete Braden assessments upon admission and then weekly for four weeks, ensure the resident is added to the shower schedule and review shower documentation and weekly skin checks to ensure compliance and identify new wounds at an early stage. This guide documents to assess,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to routinely assess and monitor a bruise/hematoma (bruising with blood pooling underneath the skin), update the physician, and assess and measure post-surgical wounds upon readmission for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for wounds in the sample list of four. This failure resulted in R1's left foot bruise/hematoma becoming infected and requiring hospital operative incision and draining (I&D). Findings include: R1's Care Plan dated as reviewed 5/13/24 documents R1's diagnoses include Peripheral Vascular Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R1's Nursing Note dated 6/1/2024 at 9:48 AM documents a fresh, purple bruise was found on the top of R1's left foot that measured 3 centimeters (cm) by 1 cm. R1 reported that R1's foot was likely bumped during R1's mechanical lift transfer yesterday. R1's Weekly Skin assessment dated [DATE] documents R1's anterior foot bruise measured 5 cm by 2.5 cm and there was no break in skin. R1's Weekly Skin Assessments dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement effective fall interventions in three (R1, R2, and R3) of three residents reviewed for falls. These failures resulted in R1 sustaining a head laceration with an arterial bleed, requiring nine sutures and R2 sustaining bilateral fractured wrists resulting in decreased independence, both as the result of falls. Findings include: The Facility Accidents and Incidents Policy dated 11/2023 documents, The Charge Nurse must conduct an immediate investigation of the accident/incident and implement immediate appropriate intervention to affected parties. 1.) R1's undated diagnosis sheet documents the following diagnoses including: dementia, encephalopathy, neutropenia, history of falls, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, type 2, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, history of a kidney transplant, hypertension, hyponatremia, and a history of a coronary artery bypass graft. R1's progress note documents admission to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional air mattress to prevent a fall from bed; failed to thoroughly investigate the environment to determine a targeted root cause to repair or replace the air mattress for R2; and failed to safely transfer a resident (R5) by full mechanical lift, from a wheelchair to recliner chair. These failures resulted in R2 sustaining a head injury and laceration requiring emergency medical care at a local hospital and R5 to get hit in forehead with mechanical lift equipment causing mild swelling and abrasion. R2 and R5 are two of five residents reviewed for accidents/accidents on the sample list of 11. Findings Include: 1.) R2's admission Record documents R2's initial admission date as 11/20/23. It includes the following diagnoses for R2: Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury with Loss of Consciousness Unspecified Duration, Subsequent Encounter 6/23/23, History of Falling 6/23/23, Post concussion Syndrome dated 11/13/23, Idiopathic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to safely transfer one (R1) of three residents reviewed for transfers from a total sample list of three. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a left proximal fibula fracture. Findings include: The facility Transfer Policy dated 1/2020 documents that it is the responsibility of all nursing staff to ensure the use of safe transfer techniques when transferring a resident. To promote the safe transfer for the residents, as well as the staff; gait belts and mechanical lifts will be used unless otherwise specified. The facility Transfer Belts/Gait Belts policy dated 7/2020 documents that if two staff are required for a transfer and a mechanical lift is not required, a gait belt should used. Do not attempt to transfer/lift/ambulate a resident who requires assist, without a gait belt. R1's diagnosis sheet documents diagnoses including; Right Above Knee Amputation, Congestive Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Gastroesophageal Reflux…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent the development of residents pressure ulcers, administer treatments as ordered, develop/implement pressure relieving interventions, accurately assess risk for developing pressure ulcers, accurately assess pressure ulcers, timely notify the physician to obtain treatment orders, and notify the resident representative of pressure ulcers. These failures affect three of five residents (R37, R64, R51) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample list of 55 residents. These failures resulted in R37 developing a left hip deep tissue injury (DTI) that deteriorated to an unstageable wound. Findings include: The facility's Wound Prevention, Identification & Treatment policy revised February 2021 documents: A pressure ulcer is caused from unrelieved pressure and causes damage to underlying tissue. A prevention plan will be implemented for residents who are at high risk for developing wounds and an aggressive treatment plan will be implemented for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent a fall, implement fall interventions, and complete post fall neurological assessments for one resident (R23) reviewed for falls in the sample list for 55 residents. This failure resulted in R23 falling, causing head and facial trauma/bruising, and an emergency room evaluation. Findings include: The facility's Accidents & Incidents policy dated 8/2/17 documents: Resident accidents and incidents will be investigated and immediate, appropriate, interventions will be implemented by the charge nurse. The resident will be monitored for 72 hours following the incident. The facility's undated Neurological Screening Guidelines documents: Neurological assessments should be completed following an unwitnessed fall or when a resident hits their head during a fall. The assessments are completed and documented on the neurological flow sheet every 15 minutes times 4, then hourly times 4, then every 8 hours times nine for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent weight loss, record meal intakes, implement nutritional recommendations, ensure weight loss was timely evaluated by the dietitian, notify the physician and family, and evaluate the effectiveness of nutritional supplements for three (R37, R18, R50) of five residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 55. This failure resulted in R37 experiencing a significant weight loss of 13.59 % between August and September 2022 and an additional significant weight loss of 8.37% between 11/23/22 and 11/30/22. Findings include: The facility's Weights policy dates as revised July 2021 documents: A resident weight loss of 5% in 1 month or 10% in 6 months will be reported to the Care Plan Coordinator, Dietary Manager, physician, and Registered Dietitian. The Director of Nursing/Designee is responsible for reviewing/monitoring weights and ensuring weight loss is reported to the physician and Registered Dietitian. Dietary should implement an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pain control to one (53) of two residents reviewed for pain from a total sample list of 55. This failure resulted in severe pain for R53 during a wound dressing change. Findings include: The undated facility census sheet documents that R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R53's undated diagnosis sheet includes diagnoses of: encephalopathy, hemiparesis, hemiplegia, history of a cerebral vascular accident, diabetes mellitus type two, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, pulmonary hypertension and congestive heart failure. R53's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R53 as cognitively intact. R53's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R53's skin as without any foot ulcers or wounds. R53's electronic medical record does not document a daily, weekly or monthly pain assessment. On 2/27/23 at 2:36 PM R53 stated, I didn't have a wound when I came in here, my feet were fine. I got an infection and this happened (pointed to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required 30 day notice to a resident discharged involuntarily. This failure affects one resident (R2) out of seven reviewed for discharges on the sample list of eight. Findings include: On 6/9/26 at 9:05 AM, V1, Administrator, stated R2 was still in the hospital. V2 stated R2 was not under an official involuntary discharge process but there was a corporate level decision not to allow R2 to return to the facility. V1 stated the facility could not meet R2's clinical needs and continued to relate conflicts with R2's daughter (V7), an extensive investment of facility resources, direct care staff necessarily providing care to R2 with two staff members to protect themselves against false accusations and allegations from R2 and V7. V1 stated all R2's personal belongings had been packed up and were waiting in her office for someone to come pick the items up. On 6/9/26 at 2:32 PM V7, Family of R2, stated R2 had been sent to the emergency room on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to answer call lights for residents needing assistance in a timely manner to promote dignity for four (R1, R2, R3, R6) residents of six residents reviewed for call light response in a sample of ten residents.Findings includeThe facility's Call Light Answering policy dated 08/02/2017 documents: All residents will have a staff member that is able to answer/and or see to the residents' request and/or needs. It is the responsibility of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and or Nurses to answer the call lights/pagers to see what requests or needs the resident may have.R1's undated Care Plan documents an admission date to this facility as 7/31/2024 with the following diagnosis: Type Two Diabetes, Asthma, and Osteoarthritis. R1's care plan contains a focus area regarding R1 having an Activities of Daily Living self-care deficit related to impaired balance and pain with an intervention in place dated 11/3/2025 reading R1 requires moderate assist by one-two staff with gait belt for toileting and that R1 uses incontinence products…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for employee-to-resident verbal abuse on a sample list of three residents. The facility failed to ensure R1 was protected from ongoing verbal abuse, degrading interactions, intimidation, and emotionally distressing treatment. The facility further failed to appropriately respond to prior concerns involving the same staff member and failed to ensure resident dignity and emotional well-being were maintained. These failures resulted in R1 feeling emotional distress, tearfulness, frustration, feelings of being degraded, and disbelieved. On 5/6/2026 at 9:24 AM, V11 (R1's) Power of Attorney (POA) stated that on 5/2/2026 at approximately 7:00 PM, R1 called V11 crying hysterically, upset, and in pain following an interaction with V9 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). V11 stated R1 was so emotionally distressed R1 could barely understand what R1 was saying. V11 stated there had been previous allegations involving V9 degrading R1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility documentation, the facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse, neglect, injury of unknown source, and mistreatment involving one resident (R1) in accordance with facility policy and federal regulations on a sample list of three residents. The facility failed to immediately report allegations to the Administrator, physician, and other required officials after staff became aware of allegations involving verbal abuse, rough handling, and injury to R1's left foot by a Certified Nursing Assistant on 5/2/2026.Findings Include: On 5/2/2026, R1 alleged that V9 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) forcefully pulled a wheelchair and struck R1's foot during care, causing pain and bruising. R1 further alleged V9 had previously degraded and verbally mistreated R1.On 5/6/2026 at 9:24 AM, V11 (R1's) Power of Attorney (POA), stated R1 called V11 on 5/2/2026 at approximately 7:00 PM crying hysterically and emotionally distressed following the incident. V11 stated V11 subsequently contacted the facility and spoke with V9 CNA, who admitted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility documentation, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse and failed to implement timely interventions to protect one (R1) from further potential abuse and emotionally distressing interactions involving Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on a Sample list of three residents. The facility failed to adequately respond to prior allegations of degrading behavior, failed to ensure effective follow-up after a care plan meeting addressing resident concerns, failed to remove the alleged staff member from resident care after repeated complaints, and failed to complete a timely and thorough investigation into allegations of verbal abuse and rough handling on 5/2/2026.Findings Include:On 5/6/2026 at 9:24 AM, V11 (R1's) Power of Attorney (POA), stated there had been prior allegations involving V9 CNA degrading and disrespecting R1 approximately two weeks before the incident on 5/2/2026. V11 stated a care plan meeting had been held with R1, V11, and facility staff, including V2 Director of Nursing (DON), where concerns…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to assess one resident (R1) for safety to self-medicate of three residents reviewed for self-medication in a sample list of eight residents. Findings Include:R1's Care Plan updated 10/2/25 includes the following diagnoses: Open Wound to the Abdominal Wall, Polyneuropathy, Spondylosis, Severe Obesity, Reduced Mobility, Repeated Falls, Chronic Clostridium Difficile, History of MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus), and History of Total Knee Replacement.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 is cognitively intact and totally dependent on staff for mobility and incontinence care.There is no documentation of a self-medication assessment documented in R1's electronic medical record. R1's Care Plan does not address self-medication. On 11/19/25 at 12:50PM, R1 had a brown capsule on the over the bed table in a medication cup. R1 was not able to verbalize what pill it was but stated, They just leave my medicine and I take…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care/catheter care in a timely manner and failed to maintain a urinary catheter bag below the level of the bladder for one resident (R1) and failed to use appropriate hand hygiene for another resident during incontinence care (R5) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care in a sample list of eight residents.Findings Include:R1's Care Plan updated 10/2/25 includes the following diagnoses: Open Wound to the Abdominal Wall, Polyneuropathy, Spondylosis, Severe Obesity, Reduced Mobility, Repeated Falls, Chronic Clostridium Difficile, History of MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus), and History of Total Knee Replacement.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 is cognitively intact and totally dependent on staff for mobility and incontinence care.On 11/19/25 at 11:30AM, R1 was observed returning from a doctor's appointment. R1 was brought to R1s room. R1 told V7, Certified Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the minimum data sheet (MDS) for three (R24, R38, R76) of 17 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy in a sample size of 38. Findings include: 1.) R76's MDS dated [DATE] documents R76 has limited range of motion (ROM) in bilateral lower extremities and no impairment in upper extremities ROM. R76's prior MDS dated [DATE] documents no impairment in upper and lower extremities. On 05/20/25 at 09:22 AM R76 used both hands and arms in the hallway. R76 had left hand contracture in a semi-fist position. R76 did not flex fingers on the left hand. 2.) R38's MDS dated [DATE] documents one sided impaired ROM to upper and lower extremity. R38's 10/22/24 and 1/6/25 MDS does not document impaired ROM. R38's 7/1/24 MDS documents one sided impaired ROM to upper and lower extremity. On 05/20/25 at 09:31 AM V19 CNA, stated she does ROM with R38 every morning. V19 stated R38 has been totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living since…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with fingernail care, eating, and shaving for four of four residents (R24, R26, R190, R38) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living in the sample list of 38. Findings include: 1.) On 05/18/25 at 2:26 PM R24's fingernails were long, approximately 1/4 inch past fingertips, and jagged. On 5/19/25 at 11:01 AM R24's fingernails remained long and jagged. On 5/19/25 at 1:12 PM V11 Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed R24's fingernails were long and jagged. V11 stated the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) are supposed to trim and clean fingernails as needed and V11 will have the CNAs trim R24's fingernails. R24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R24 has moderate cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff assistance for personal hygiene. R24's active care plan does not document R24 refuses nail care. 2.) On 5/18/25 at 8:41 AM R26 was lying in bed and R26's fingernails were long, approximately 1/4 inch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent and treat pressure ulcers and failed to complete initial wound assessments for three residents (R24, R84, R140) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample list of 38. Findings include: 1. R140's current diagnoses list includes the following diagnoses: Type II Diabetes, Morbid Obesity, Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage III, History of Cerebral Infarction, Major Depression, Difficulty in Walking, Anemia, and Pilonidal Cyst with abscess. R140's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R140 is mildly cognitively impaired and requires a wheelchair for mobility. R140's Care Plan reviewed 4/21/25 documents R140 requires a specialized air mattress and is to be turned and repositioned every two hours and as needed. On 5/18/25 at 10:00AM R140 was seated in his wheelchair beside his bed. R140's sweat pants were soaked down to his knees in the front. R140's bed was stripped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered for three of nine residents (R24, R50, R78) reviewed for medication administration in the sample list of 38. This failure resulted in three medication errors out of 25 opportunities, a 12% medication error rate. Findings include: 1.) R24's May 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documents to administer Novolin Regular Insulin per blood glucose (milligrams per deciliter) based sliding scale, with meals, scheduled at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, and 5:00 PM. On 5/19/25 at 12:06 PM R24 was in the main dining room eating lunch. On 5/19/25 at 12:30 PM R24 was in R24's room. V15 Registered Nurse (RN) administered 6 units of Novolin Regular Insulin into R24's abdomen. V15 stated V15 checked R24's blood sugar just a few minutes prior, which was 280. V15 confirmed R24 already ate lunch prior to R24's blood glucose check and insulin administration. On 5/20/25 at 1:50 PM V1 Administrator stated blood glucose should be checked prior to meals. V1 confirmed sliding scale insulin should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label and store medications and account for controlled medications for five of 16 residents (R40, R61, R71, R192, R63) reviewed for medication storage in the sample list of 38. Findings include: The facility's pharmacy policy titled Administration Procedures for all Medications, dated 10/25/14, documents to check the expiration date on package and container prior to medication administration and to label an opened date on multi-dose containers. The facility's Narcotic Count policy dated 9/5/22 documents a physical count of narcotics will be done by the oncoming and off-going nurses at each change of shift to identify discrepancies and to ensure controlled medications are handled, stored, disposed of and accounted for properly. This policy documents the controlled medication record will accompany the controlled medication. The facility's Storage of Medications policy dated April 2025 documents all resident medications should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate contact droplet precautions for two residents (R36, R69) and failed to sanitize a blood glucose meter following use to prevent cross contamination for one resident (R24) of 17 residents reviewed for infection control in a sample list of 38. Findings Include: The facility's Glucose Meter Cleaning policy dated July 2019 documents clean and disinfect the blood glucose meter after each use with an Environmental Protection Agency approved cleaner. The facility's policy Transmission Based Precautions revised April of 2025 documents In order to prevent the spread of communicable diseases isolation will be initiated according to CDC (Center for Disease Control) transmission based guidelines. Transmission based guidelines will be used in all cases in which standard precautions does not provide adequate barrier protection. Transmission based guidelines will be used to determine whether airborne, droplet, or contact isolation precautions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain or improve range of motion and contractures following recommended restorative program for one (R76) of four residents reviewed in a sample size of 38. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Functional Maintenance Program dated April 2025 documents therapy will provide recommendations for maintenance programing based on therapy outcomes or screenings. Individual tasks will be documented in the Point of Care (POC) in the electronic health record (EHR). Measurable objectives, goals and interventions will be documented in the care plan. On 05/18/25 09:09 AM R76 was in bed and R76's right hand appeared contracted. On 5/20/25 at 9:22 AM R76 used hands and arms in the hallway. R76's left hand appeared contracted in a semi-fist position. R76 did not flex fingers on left hand. R76's face sheet dated 5/20/25 documents an admission date of 3/29/24 with a history of down syndrome, and adult failure to thrive. R76's MDS dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to check gastric residual volume during gastrostomy tube (g-tube) medication administration for one of two residents (R26) reviewed for g-tubes in the sample list of 38. Findings include: The facility's Tube Feeding (Administration of Medication) policy dated April 2025 documents to stop the feeding, disconnect the tubing, and check the tubing for placement before administering medications. R26's Care Plan dated 2/10/25 documents R26 has a g-tube and to monitor gastric residual volume prior to administering nutrition and medications. On 5/19/25 at 3:06 PM V17 Registered Nurse stopped R26's feeding, disconnected the tubing, and checked g-tube placement using air rush technique with syringe. V17 did not check gastric residual volume prior to administering water flushes, Tylenol, and Vitamin D3 into R26's g-tube. V17 confirmed V17 did not check gastric residual at this time. V17 stated V17 checked R26's gastric residual earlier, at the beginning of his shift. On 5/20/25 at 12:16 PM V11 Assistant Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the state agency (Illinois Department of Public Health) in the required two hour time frame. This failure affects one resident (R1) out of three reviewed for injuries on the sample list of three. Findings include: On 4/10/25 at 11:24 AM, R1 was lying in bed and did not make any verbal responses to a greeting by name and made no verbal responses to questions. R1's Census Detail dated 4/10/24 documents R1 was admitted to the facility 1/14/25, with a subsequent admission 3/7/25. R1's Diagnoses List dated 4/10/25 documents R1 had surgical repair of a right trochanter (hip) fracture which was present on R1's admission of 1/14/25, and surgical repair of a displaced spiral fracture of the right distal femur (knee area) present on R1's admission of 3/7/25. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 received a score of 4 out of a possible 15 during a brief interview for mental status, indicating severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a fall prevention intervention according to a resident's care plan. This failure affects one resident (R1) out of three reviewed for fall prevention on the sample list of three. Findings include: On 4/10/25 at 11:24 AM, R1 was lying in bed and did not make any verbal responses to a greeting by name and made no verbal responses to questions. There was an alarm sensor pad underneath R1 with a wire cord leading towards the foot end of R1's bed, however the cord was not plugged in to anything. There was an alarm box module on top of a four drawer bureau across the room approximately eight feet away from R1's bed. On 4/10/25 at 11:29 AM, V5, Registered Nurse, confirmed the alarm sensor was not plugged into the module as it should be. V5 further stated he had knowledge of R1's Care Plan containing a fall prevention intervention that R1 was to have the bed alarm and it should be maintained in a functional condition. R1's Care Plan documents a fall prevention intervention dated as initiated on 3/28/25 for a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident received repositioning for one (R2) of three residents reviewed for repositioning on a sample list of 4. Findings include: On 2/18/25 at 9:49 AM, 10:35 AM, 10:48 AM, 11:12 AM, 11:49 AM, 12:01 PM, and 12:30 PM, R2 was in his room sitting upright in a reclining geriatric chair. On 2/18/25 at 1:54, V8 Certified Nursing Assistant stated she did not lay R2 down this morning because he got up later than usual, around 9:30 AM to 9:45 AM and wasn't laid down until 1:15/1:30PM. V8 confirmed R2 was in reclining geriatric chair from around 9:30/9:45 AM to 1:15/1:30 PM. Resident/Family Concern Grievance Form documents that a grievance was made on 1/10/25 by V9 spouse of R2. V9 reported she had concerns that R2 was not being repositioned throughout the day. R2's Care Plan dated 1/17/25 documents R2 requires total assist from staff with transfers and requires repositioning every two hours and as needed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify and assess for significant weight loss and ensure nutrition/weight loss was evaluated by the physician and dietitian for one (R3) of three residents reviewed for weight loss in the sample list of four. Findings include: On 2/18/25 at 12:07 V24 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was feeding R3's meal which consisted of creamed corn, mashed potatoes, ground country fried steak and cake. At 12:25 PM V24 brought R3's meal tray to the hall cart and stated R3 only ate about 10% of the meal and R3 didn't like the food. V24 stated V24 offered to order R3 alternative food, but R3 declined. R3's meal tray showed R3 ate a few bites of corn, meat and cake. On 2/19/25 at 9:30 AM V23 CNA assisted V3 Assistant Director of Nursing with R3's pressure ulcer treatment administration. R3 had one open, pink/yellow wound to the left buttock with two small superficial wounds next to it. R3 had a deep coccyx wound and the wound bed had pink and yellow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for three (R1, R3, R4) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample list of four. Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy dated 10/21/22 documents EBP expands the use of gloves and gowns to be worn during high-contact care activities that provides opportunities for Multidrug Resistant Organisms (MDROs) to be transferred between staff hands or clothing and between residents during these high-contact cares. This policy documents residents with wounds and indwelling medical devices are at high risk of acquisition and colonization of MDROs. This policy documents to wear gown and gloves when assisting residents on EBP with high-contact care activities, including dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, providing device care or wound care. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Consideration for Use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide fingernail care for one of three residents (R3) reviewed for hygiene in the sample list of four. Findings include: R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R3 has moderate cognitive impairment and requires substantial/maximal assistance from staff for bathing and personal hygiene. R3's Care Plan with reviewed date 7/26/24 documents R3's diagnoses include right sided Hemiplegia/Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. On 7/29/24 at 9:45 AM V6 Certified Nursing Assistant entered R3's room, provided incontinence cares, and washed R3's face and under arms. R3's fingernails were long, past R3's fingertips, and a black substance was visible underneath. V6 did not offer or provide nail care for R3. On 7/29/24 at 10:04 AM R3 stated the staff trim/clean R3's fingernails about every three days and they have been this long/dirty for about two days. R3 stated R3 would like R3's fingernails cleaned and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement pressure relieving interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers, and failed to measure, assess, and report pressure ulcers for two of three residents (R2, R3) reviewed for wounds in the sample list of four. Findings include: 1.) On 7/29/24 at 8:47 AM R2 was lying in bed on R2's back. R2 stated staff change R2 once per day. R2 has a sore on R2's bottom that has been there for about a month, and the staff apply cream to the area. At 10:00 AM R2 was lying in bed. At 10:58 AM R2 was lying in bed on R2's back. R2 stated R2 is currently incontinent of urine, but no one has come in recently to check R2 or reposition R2. On 7/29/24 at 12:16 PM V17 and V10 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) entered R2's room to provide incontinence cares. R2 was lying in bed on R2's back, and there were no pillows positioned underneath of R2 to offload pressure. R2's brief was wet with a moderate amount of urine. There was a small open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely notify the physician of newly developed, draining wounds for one (R1) of four resident reviewed for wounds in the sample list of six. Findings include: R1's ongoing census documents R1 readmitted from the hospital on 3/1/24. R1's Nurses Weekly Skin assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 had bruising to the groin and abdomen. There is no documentation that R1 had wounds to the abdomen when R1 readmitted on [DATE]. R1's Nursing Note dated 3/3/24 at 1:41 PM documents, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) found 3 new open areas just above resident's penis. [NAME] pus coming out of all 3 open areas. Cleaned and dressing placed. Wound nurse notified. R1's Nursing Note dated 03/04/2024 at 5:49 PM documents, Order received for Doxycycline (antibiotic) BID (twice daily) today r/t (related to) open areas on abdominal area. There is no documentation that R1's Physician (V11) was notified of R1's abdominal wounds found on 3/3/24 prior to 3/4/24 when antibiotics…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level requires more than one deficient practice statement: A. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to culture a residents' draining wound prior to initiating antibiotics, assess a residents' surgical incision upon admission to include measurements/description of the surgical wound, and accurately transcribe wound treatment orders for three (R1, R2, R6) of four residents reviewed for wounds in the sample list of six. Findings include: A1.) R1's ongoing census documents R1 readmitted from the hospital on 3/1/24. R1's Nursing Weekly Skin assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 had bruising to the groin and abdomen and this note does not document open abdominal wounds. There is no documentation in R1's electronic medical record that R1 had abdominal wounds when R1 readmitted on [DATE]. R1's Nursing Note dated 3/3/24 at 1:41 PM documents, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) found 3 new open areas just above resident's penis. [NAME] pus coming out of all 3 open areas.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record the facility failed to assess and measure a pressure ulcer upon admission for one (R2) of four residents reviewed for wounds in the sample list of six. Findings include: R2's ongoing Census documents R2 readmitted from the hospital on 4/15/24. R2's Nurses Weekly Skin assessment dated [DATE] documents R2 has an unstageable coccyx wound. There are no measurements or description/characteristics of this wound documented in R2's medical record until 4/16/24. R2's Wound Summary with date range 4/16/24-4/24/24 documents on 4/16/24 R2's unstageable pressure ulcer was 75% non-granulating tissue and 25% deep maroon, had moderate drainage, and measured 6 centimeters (cm) by 4 cm with unknown depth. On 4/25/24 at 8:50 AM V4 Wound Nurse and V10 Wound Physician entered R2's room. V4 removed R2's coccyx wound dressing. The wound was pink with some dark tissue in the center of the wound. V10 measured the wound and stated it measured 4.8 cm by 2.1 cm. V4 cleansed the wound and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-19 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to employ a clinically, qualified Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This failure has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 4/16/24 at 10:10 am V8, Dietary Manager (DM) was actively supervising dietary operations in the facility kitchen. V8 stated the facility has had a lot of staff turnover in the kitchen and V8 has not had time to even compete the first module of the required DM education. On 4/16/24 at 10:15 am V8 assessed the commercial table top mixer and confirmed there is a buildup of rust, grease, and food debris on the under-plate directly over the multi-gallon commercial bowl. V8 stated, This will be addressed. It definitely needs attention. V8 confirmed the commercial can opener has a build-up on grease, metal fragments and rust in the gears, silver laminate coating peeling off the can opener blade and upper shaft of the can opener. The sleeve, that hold the table top commercial can opener shaft, has a build-up of brown and black grease-like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain facility kitchen equipment in a clean, sanitary condition, to prevent potential cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This failure has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On initial tour of the facility kitchen at 9:30 am. V9, [NAME] stated both the facility commercial sized, table top mixer and commercial table-top can opener were considered clean. 1. On 4/16/24 at 10:15 am V8, Dietary Manager joined the initial tour of the kitchen and assessed the commercial table top mixer. V8 confirmed there is a buildup of rust, grease, and food debris on the underplate directly over the multi-gallon commercial mixing bowl. V8 stated, This will be addressed. It definitely needs attention. 2. On 4/16/24 at 10:25 am V8, DM confirmed the commercial can opener has a build-up on grease, metal fragments and rust in the gears, silver laminate coating peeling off the can opener blade and upper shaft of the can opener. Rust was also present on both the can opener…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have required members attend Quarterly Quality Assurance (QAA) meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 4/16/24, documents 96 residents reside in the facility. The facility provided quarterly QAA meeting attendance forms dated 6/6/23 through 4/20/24, documents no Infection Preventionist present on 6/26/23, and verbal review only by the Medical Director on 11/21/23 and 4/20/24. On 4/17/24 at 11:47 AM, V1 Administrator stated V1 she did not know the Medical Director. The MD couldn't do a verbal review and did not know the MD had to be present in person or video. V1 confirmed the April QAA done 4/20/23, only had a verbal review from the medical director and the June 6/26/23 QAA did not have the Infection Preventionist present 11/21/23 and only had the MD's verbal review. On 4/19/24 at 1:00 PM, V1 Administrator stated the facility's QAA Committee list documents the following members need…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to dignified activities of daily living. This failure affects six of six (R2, R38, R49, R72, R73, R77) residents reviewed for dignity on the sample list of 24. Findings include: The facility policy Resident Privacy and Dignity dated revised 3/2/24 documents the following: PURPOSE: To provide all residents with a home like environment that promotes dignity and respect to the residents of the facility. POLICY: To ensure that all residents are provided with dignity and privacy. RESPONSIBILITY: It is the responsibility of all staff to ensure that all residents have privacy and dignity. PROCEDURE: 1. All residents will be addressed and spoken to with dignity and respect at all times. All residents will be addressed by their preferred name during conversation. 2. Staff will knock on the resident's door prior to entering the resident's room. Staff will be invited into the resident's room if the resident is capable of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately encode a resident's health status on the Resident Assessment Instrument (Minimum Data Set) regarding dialysis. This failure affects one of two residents (R92) reviewed for dialysis on the sample list of 24. Findings include: On 04/16/24 at 12:48 PM R92 had a dressing on R92's left upper arm. R92 stated the dressing is covering his dialysis port. R92 stated R92 goes to an outside facility for dialysis treatment three times per week. R92's Physician order Sheet dated 4/19/24 documents: Dialysis: Monday -Wednesday -Friday at (a local) Dialysis Center. R92's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R92's Brief Interview of Mental Status score as 14 out of a possible 15, which indicates R92 has no cognitive impairment. The same MDS fails to document that R92 receives dialysis treatments. Dialysis coded incorrectly. On 4/19/24 at 1:12 pm V1, Administrator/ Registered Nurse acknowledged R92's MDS is not accurately encoded to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide PRN (as needed) dressing changes for a resident. This failure affects one resident (R7) reviewed for dressing changes in the sample list of 24. Findings include: R7's undated Medical Diagnoses Page documents R7's diagnoses as: Pyogenic Arthritis, unspecified, aftercare, following joint replacement surgery, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Morbid (severe) Obesity due to excess calories, Methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus Aureus Infection, Unspecified site, and presence of left artificial knee joint. R7's Physicians Order Sheet (POS) dated April 1, 2024 through April 30, 2024, documents R7's orders as: left knee: cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, then loosely pack with 1/4 inch iodoform packing strip, apply abdomen pad and wrap with gauze bandage roll, may secure dressing with elastic wrap daily and PRN if soiled or dislodged. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents R7 is cognitively intact. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide and implement fall interventions to prevent falls for a resident. These failures affect one of one resident (R29) reviewed for accidents/supervision on the sample list of 24. Findings include: R29's Current (multiple dates) Diagnoses Sheet documents the following diagnoses: Malignant Neoplasm of the Head of the Pancreas, Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Liver and Intrahepatic Bile Duct, Spinal Stenosis Lumbosacral Regions, Spinal Stenosis Cervical Region, Unspecified Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. R29's Functional Assessment-Admission dated 02/29/24 documents R29 requires supervision and touching assistance with toileting and chair to bed transfers. 29's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents the following: R29's Brief Interview of Cognitive status score of 13 out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The same MDS documents: Supervision or touching assistance -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer two physician ordered intravenous antibiotic medications on two consecutive days resulting in a delay in treatment for one resident (R7) of one resident reviewed for significant medication errors in the sample list of 24. Findings include: R7's undated Medical Diagnoses Page documents R7's diagnoses as: Pyogenic Arthritis, unspecified, aftercare, following Joint Replacement surgery, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Morbid (severe) Obesity due to excess calories, Methicillin susceptible (resistant) Staphylococcus Aureus infection, Unspecified site, presence of left artificial knee joint. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents R7 is cognitively intact. R7's Physicians Order Sheet (POS) dated April 1, 2024 through April 30, 2024, documents R7's orders as: Vancomycin Hydrochloride (HCl) Intravenous (IV) Solution, use 1000 milligrams (mg) intravenously one time a day related to Pyogenic Arthritis, unspecified aftercare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one of two residents (R92) reviewed for dialysis/medical records on the sample list of 24. Findings include: R92's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R92's Brief Interview of Mental Status score as 14, out of a possible 15, which indicates R92 has no cognitive impairment. On 04/16/24 at 12:48 pm, R92 had an undated gauze wound dressing on R92's left upper arm. R92 stated the dressing is covering his dialysis fistula port. R92 stated R92 goes to an outside facility for dialysis treatments, three times per week. R92 also stated the facility nurses do not assess R92's dialysis port fistula patency by thrill (feel for a vibration) and bruit (listen with a stethoscope). R92's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 4/19/24 documents: Dialysis: Monday -Wednesday -Friday at (a local) Dialysis Center R92's POS documents: Dialysis: Check Dialysis Site Q (every) Shift for s/s of infection, every…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to wear a gown during high-contact resident wound care activities in accordance with the physician order, and the infection control enhanced barrier precaution policy. This failure affected one of three residents (R9) reviewed for pressure ulcers/wounds on the sample list of 24. Findings include: R9's Diagnosis Sheet dated 4/18/24 documents the following diagnoses: Type II Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Type II Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic with Polyneuropathy, Atherosclerosis of Native Artery with Intermittent Claudication, Bilateral Legs, Gangrene Not elsewhere Classified, Acquired Absence of Unspecified Finger(s), Acquired Absence of Unspecified Left Leg Below Knee, Acquired Absence of Right Leg Below Knee, and Phantom Limb Syndrome with Pain. R9's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 4/17/24 documents the following: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) in place during high-contact care activities that provides opportunities for transfer of MDROs (Multi-Resistant organisms that are resistant to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain residents' dignity by failing to provide timely incontinence care for two of six residents (R9 and R10) reviewed for delay in treatment/abuse/dignity on the sample list of 11. Findings include: 1.) R9's Diagnoses Sheet last updated 11/15/23 document the following: Unspecified Urinary Incontinence, Type II Diabetes with Neuropathy, Morbid Obesity Due To Excess Calories and Mood Disorder due to Known Physiological Condition With Depressive Features. R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R9's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score as 13, out of a possible 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. The same MDS documents R9 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The same MDS documents: OBRA Interim section GG0130, Toileting hygiene: The ability to maintain perineal hygiene, adjust clothes before and after voiding or having a bowel movement. If managing an ostomy, include wiping the opening but not managing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility Administrator failed to recognize and timely report an allegation of staff to resident physical abuse to a law enforcement agency for one of six residents (R4) reviewed for abuse on the sample of 11 Findings include: The facility policy Abuse Prevention Program dated January 2022 directs the staff as follows: PURPOSE: This facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. This facility will not knowingly employ individuals who have been convicted of abusing, neglecting, or mistreating individuals. PROCEDURE: VIII. External Reporting of Potential Abuse 1. Initial Reporting of Allegations. If mistreatment has occurred, the resident's representative and Department of Public Health shall be informed as soon as possible of any allegation of abuse. In the events that cause the reasonable suspicion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records by failing to document R10's history of abuse on R10's abuse risk assessment. These failures affected one of eight residents (R10) reviewed for accidents /abuse on the sample list of 11. Findings include: R10's (Private Company) Psychiatric note dated 12/28/23 documents: Childhood Trauma= Mom left them. She lived with her stepdad. Was raped by 2 (two) men. Later, she moved to live with her mom again. PTSD (Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder) = Stepdad used to beat her with a leather trap. She denies flashbacks. She occasionally has flashbacks of the rape by 2 (two) men. One of the men had a sexual intercourse with her. She said they were crazy men who thought she was their girlfriend in the past and broke their heart. Patients denies such accusations and said she didn't know those 2 strange men. (Private Company) note: F41.1: Generalized anxiety disorder, F43.10: Post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), PLAN Med…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow an order for pain medication as written by the pain specialist for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for pain in a sample of three residents. Findings include: The facility's Management of Pain policy last reviewed by the facility on August 2019 states, Resident and family are encouraged to report resident pain early so pain management can be more effective. Resident and family will be asked periodically measure satisfaction related to pain and it's management. This policy further states As a part of our approach to pain assessment and management, pain will be considered the fourth (sic) vital sign at the facility along with temperature, pulse, respirations, and blood pressure. For the purpose of this policy pain is defined as whatever the experiencing person says it is and existing whenever the existing person says it does. R1's Care Plan dated 8/1/23 includes the following diagnoses: Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, Morbid Obesity,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have the required members of the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee in attendance at its quarterly Quality Assurance meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 88 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Quality Assurance sign in sheets dated 3/15/22 has no documentation of the Director of Nursing, Infection Preventionist or Medical Director being in attendance, 7/28/22 has no documentation of the Infection Preventionist and Medical Director being in attendance, 9/19/22 has no documentation of the Infection Preventionist being in attendance, 12/22/22 has no documentation of the Director of Nursing and Medical Director being in attendance, and 1/23/23 has no documentation of the Director of Nursing and Medical Director being in attendance. On 3/1/23 at 9:55 AM, V1 Administrator stated there was not a Director of Nursing at the Quality Assurance meetings held on 4/21/22, 10/20/22 or 1/31/23. The facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report dated 2/27/23 provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices to prevent the spread of disease to other residents. Failures include display of proper signage for COVID-19 (Human Coronavirus); wearing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) into infectious resident rooms; wearing PPE as indicated during staff and resident testing for COVID-19; educate/encourage COVID-19 positive resident about measures to prevent infecting others, and pulling curtains during respiratory care in rooms with two residents. These failures affect 13 residents (R3, R9, R10, R16, R19, R30, R39, R66, R67, R79, R81, R142, R238) reviewed for infection control on the total sample of 55. These failures have the potential to affect all 88 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: R9's undated Face Sheet documents R9 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility's undated room roster presented on 2/27/23, documents R9 as a COVID positive contact to R16 (they share a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to invite residents and their family members to care conferences for care planning purposes in four (R28, R53, R68, R74) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans from a total sample list of 55. Findings include: 1. R28's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R28 as cognitively intact. R28's progress note dated 10/20/21 documents admission to the facility. On 2/27/23 at 2:48 PM, R28 stated that he had not been invited to care conferences, that he could recall. R28's progress notes document that R28's last quarterly care conference was held on 9/22/22. 2. R53's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R53 as cognitively intact. R53's progress note dated 12/16/20 documents admission to the facility. On 2/27/23 at 2:31 PM, R53 stated that he had not been asked to a care conference. R53's progress notes document that R53's last quarterly care conference was held on 8/31/22. 3. R68's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R68 as moderately cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist with nail care for four (R11, R3, R18, and R37) of 24 residents reviewed for assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) on the sample list of 55. Findings include: 1. On 2/27/23 at 4:06 PM, R37 was lying in bed on right side, fingernails long, with dark substance underneath. On 2/28/23 at 9:10 AM, R37 was lying in bed on right side, fingernails long past fingertips, and dirty. On 2/28/23 at 12:19 PM, V39 Registered Nurse stated R37 currently has a fungus to his nails that he is receiving treatment for. V39 stated he is not diabetic and the CNAs should be trimming them. R37's 11/17/23 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documents R37 is totally dependent for personal hygiene. 2. On 02/27/23 at 9:31 AM, R11 stated it would be nice if my fingernails were shorter, and the staff have only trimmed them once for me. R11's fingernails were one half inch past the fingertips. R11's 11/30/22 MDS documents R11 requires extensive assistance with personal hygiene. 3. On 2/27/23 at 11:04 AM, R3 was lying in bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications in accordance with Physician's Orders and failed to administer Gastrostomy tube medications separately for two of four residents (R47, R138) reviewed for medication administration in the sample list of 55. The facility had 4 medication errors out of 25 opportunities resulting in a 16% (percent) medication error rate. Findings include: The facility's Administration of Medications policy with a revised date of July 2022 documents, Purpose: To provide licensed personnel with guidelines for proper administration of medications. Policy: Residents shall receive their medications on a timely basis in accordance with state and federal guidelines, and within established facility policies. Procedure: 1. Drugs and biologicals may be administered only by licensed physicians, licensed registered or practical nursing personnel, and must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store residents medications separately from food. This failure affects 10 residents (R338, R47, R6, R36, R43, R82, R53, R138, R76, R40) with medications in the medication room refrigerator in the sample list of 55. Findings include: On 3/1/23 at 1:35 PM, V38 Registered Nurse completed the medication storage room tour of the second-floor medication room. At this time there was yogurt, protein shakes and dill pickle bites in the medication refrigerator. In this same refrigerator there was medication for individual residents and stock medications for back up supply. On 3/1/23 at 2:52 PM, V2 Director of Nursing supplied a list of items in the medication refrigerator in the second-floor medication room. This list documents the refrigerator contains Lorazepam (antianxiety) concentrate for R338, R47 and R6, Insulin Glargine for R36, R43, R82 and R138, Lispro (insulin) for R43, R53, R138 and R76, Lantus (insulin) for R82 and R53, Humulin R (insulin) for R82 and Latanoprost eye drops for R40. This list documents that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders and weigh a resident at risk for rapid weight fluctuations due to dialysis treatment. This failure affects one (R40) of seven residents reviewed for weights from a total sample list of 55. Findings include: R40's progress notes document admission to the facility on [DATE]. R40s undated diagnosis sheet documents the following diagnoses: end stage renal disease, moderate calorie malnutrition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and anxiety. R40's physician orders dated 12/30/21 document R40 is to have renal dialysis three times a week. R40's progress notes document on 12/10/22 R40 was transferred to the hospital with fluid overload. R40's physician orders dated 12/13/22 document R40 to have daily weights recorded. The facility provided weight sheet and the dialysis weight sheets document weights are not recorded on 12/25/22, 12/27/22, 12/29/22, 1/3/23, 1/14/23, 1/28/23, 1/29/23, 1/31/23, 2/2/23, 2/4/23, 2/5/23, 2/7/23, 2/8/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner, obtain order for oxygen administration, and obtain an order for respiratory equipment changes for two of two residents (R5, R47) reviewed for respiratory equipment on the sample list of 55. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen Administration policy with a revision date of 01/23 documents under section B. that all orders must include the following: C. oxygen order. 1. R5's Care Plan dated 2/7/23 documents R5 has a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure, history of COVID, sleep apnea with BIPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure), history of pleural effusion, and shortness of breath. On 2/27/23 at 10:55 AM, there were two BIPAP masks lying on the bedside table unbagged. There was oxygen tubing lying on the floor. The end of the oxygen tubing was unbagged and lying on the floor. On 2/27/23 at 2:06 PM, R5 stated the BIPAP masks continued to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$67,825 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $18,675 — penalty dated 2025-02-19
- $19,474 — penalty dated 2024-07-30
- $29,676 — penalty dated 2024-01-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ACCOLADE HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FREEDMAN, MOSHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | 98% | since 11/01/2020 |
| TIOM DANVILLE PROPERTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 11/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $532K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145243. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.