Accolade Paxton Senior Living
450 Fulton Street, Paxton, IL 60957 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 75 certified beds · (217) 379-2116 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 5 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.2% | 13.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 53.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.0% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.9% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.5% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.3% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 2.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 66.3% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 39.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.3% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.54 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.53 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 99 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.8%CMS range 35.9–56.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.5–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 68.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 73.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 3.1–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 66.3 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.481 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety of a resident by failing to ensure R1 was assessed for independent safe handling of extremely hot liquids. This resulted in R1 sustaining 2nd degree burns to R1's left thigh. The facility also failed to implement an intervention for an adaptive cup for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for accidents in the sample list of three. Findings include: R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 has Dementia with moderate cognitive impairment and requires setup and supervision assistance for eating. R1's Care Plan dated 8/14/23 documents (R1) has a skin burn of the left lateral thigh/groin r/t (related to) burn from hot coffee spilled at dinner. This care plan includes an intervention to use a spill proof cup for hot liquids during meals. R1's Skin Report dated 8/13/23 at 4:30 PM recorded by V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) documents a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) alerted V11 that R1 had a skin concern to the left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level required more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's call lights were answered in a reasonable time frame for seven of 17 residents (R50, R60, R81, R82, R74, R83, R43) reviewed for resident rights on a sample list of 43.B. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for three of 17 residents (R18, R74, R82) reviewed for resident rights in the sample list of 43. a.1) The facility policy Call Lights: Answering dated 8/2/17 documents call lights are to be answered in a reasonable time frame and all call lights should be answered courteously. Record review of Resident Council meeting minutes dated January, February, and March 2026 document ongoing concerns related to call lights not being answered timely. On 4/6/2026 at 12:15PM, V4 (R81's Power of Attorney) stated R81 had to wait an hour to get a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to appropriately label eye drops and inhalers with the date opened for three (R18, R42, R48) of eight residents reviewed for medication administration on a sample list of 43.Findings:On 4/8/26 at 10:53 a.m., the facility's Main Skilled Medication Cart was inspected in the presence of V20, Registered Nurse (RN). During the inspection, two open bottles of Latanoprost labeled for R18 were found without documented dates of opening. R42's Incruse Ellipta inhaler also lacked a documented date of opening and R48's Latanoprost and Timolol did not contain documented dates of opening.Review of R18's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated April 2026 documents R18 has an active physician's order and is currently receiving Latanoprost 0.005 % Solution every evening.Review of R42's MAR dated April 2026 documents R42 has an active physician's order and is currently receiving Incruse Ellipta Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 62.5 micrograms daily.Review of R48's MAR dated April 2026 documents R48 has an active…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) status reflected resident wishes as desired throughout the Electronic Health Record for two (R8 and R51) of 17 residents reviewed for advanced directives in the sample of 43. Findings Include: 1. R51's admission Record documents an admission date of [DATE]. R51's Order Detail Report printed [DATE] documents on [DATE] an Advance Directive order for Full Code. R51's Resident Information Sheet printed on [DATE] documents R51's Advance Directive as FULL CODE. R51's IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Uniform Practitioner Order For Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form documented an X marked on the box for Do Not Attempt Resuscitation. This form was signed by R51 and dated [DATE] and signed by the Authorized Practitioner. R51's Care Plan revised on [DATE] documents R51 chooses to have death with dignity, advanced directive established. Individual wishes include: DNR refer to POLST. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit a discharge Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) resident assessment for two of 17 residents (R20, R54) reviewed for resident assessment on a sample list of 43.Findings Include: R20's census list documents an admission date of 11/12/25 and a discharge date of 12/27/25. R20's MDS list documents no discharge MDS completed. R54's census list documents an admission date of 11/06/25 and a discharge date of 12/11/25. R54's MDS list documents no discharge MDS completed. On 04/08/2026 at 11:22 AM V23 Minimum Data Set Registered Nurse stated she did in fact miss doing the discharge MDS for R20 and R54. V23 stated she usually completes the discharge MDS immediately.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise a care plan with falls and post fall interventions for one of three residents (R82) reviewed for falls in the sample list of 43. Findings include:On 4/6/26 at 9:37 AM R82 was lying in bed, bed was low to the floor, and a fall mat was beside the bed. R82 stated R82 recently admitted to the facility following shoulder surgery. R82 stated R82 slid out of her wheelchair two days ago. R82 stated R82 is using a different wheelchair than the one she was using that day. R82 stated R82 had a prior fall from her wheelchair while trying to stand up. R82 stated R82 was unsure what follow up actions the facility took to prevent further falls. R82's wheelchair contained an anti-tip device. The facility's Fall report dated 3/29/26 documents R82 fell at 10:30 PM after attempting to stand from her wheelchair to look for clothing in her closet. The interdisciplinary note dated 3/30/26 documents: R82's wheelchair brakes weren't locked at the time of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately transcribe an order for pain medication for one of three residents (R18) reviewed for hospitalization in the sample list of 43. Findings include: On 04/06/2026 at 11:47 AM R18 stated he admitted to the facility from the hospital after being treated for severe pain in his left shoulder. R18 stated R18's pain returned and R18 was sent back to the hospital five days after R18 admitted to the facility. On 4/7/26 at 11:58 AM R18 showed a paper copy of R18's hospital discharge orders dated 3/9/26 which included Methocarbamol (muscle relaxant) 500 milligrams (mg) by mouth every six hours for 15 doses. R18 stated he did not recall taking this medication or requesting this order to be changed to as needed (PRN) instead of scheduled. R18's March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documents to administer Methocarbamol 500 mg by mouth every six hours as needed from 3/9/26-3/16/26, with only one dose administered. This MAR does not include the order to give Methocarbamol 500 mg every six hours for 15 doses. This MAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the dishwasher rinse temperatures to ensure sanitation of service wares and utensils utilized to serve meals to the residents. This failure affects nearly all (62 of 63) residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 3/5/24 at 8:57 AM, V3, Dietary Manager, stated the commercial dishwasher utilized to wash the resident dishes, wares, and utensils, was a hot water sanitizing dishwasher. At this time, while the facility commercial dishwasher was in operation, the final rinse temperature was not displaying as designed on the digital display on the front of the dishwasher. When asked how the kitchen staff are monitoring the final rinse temperature to ensure the wares are being properly sanitized, V3 replied, I will have to look for test strips. V3 could not locate the temperature sensitive test strips. V3 questioned a Dietary Aid (V4) who likewise could not identify the location of the test strips. V4 also stated, I don't know how long the display has not been showing the final rinse temperature.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide dignity while obtaining a respiratory assessment for one (R46) resident out of one resident reviewed for dignity in a sample list of 33 residents. Findings include: R46's undated Medical Diagnosis List documents medical diagnoses of Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Shortness of Breath and Disorders of Electrolyte and Fluid Imbalance. R46's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R46 as cognitively intact. R46's Care Plan intervention dated 11/20/2023 documents R46 transfers with the assist of one person and a walker. On 3/6/24 at 12:00 PM R46 was sitting at a dining room table eating the lunch meal. V14 Registered Respiratory Therapist (RRT) walked up to R46 while R46 was eating lunch meal and stated 'Put your finger out so I can get your Oxygen saturation (O2 sat)'. V14 RRT obtained R46's O2 sat, Pulse, Respirations and Blood Pressure at dining room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a Baseline Care Plan timely for one (R266) resident out of one resident reviewed for Baseline Care Plans in a sample list of 33 residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled '24 Hour Interim Care Plan' revised 2/2021 documents the purpose is to provide guidelines for completion of a 24 hour (Interim) Plan of Care for newly admitted residents. The policy states a 24 Hour Care Plan guides provision of care from the time of the resident transfer/admission until the Interdisciplinary Care Plan is completed and to provide a [NAME] with the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for resident care direction. R266's undated Face Sheet documents R266 admitted to facility on 3/1/24. R266's undated medical diagnosis list documents R266's medical diagnoses of Local Infection of the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue, Cellulitis Unspecified, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, Chronic Venous Hypertension with Ulcer and Inflammation of Bilateral Lower Extremities,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent cross contamination of pressure ulcers during pressure ulcer wound care and failed to complete wound treatments for two (R45, R266) residents out of four residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers in a sample list of 33 residents. Findings include: 1.) R45's undated Face Sheet documents R45 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This same Face Sheet documents R45's medical diagnoses of Right Hip Pressure Ulcer Stage IV, Morbid Obesity, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Sepsis, Diabetes Mellitus Type II, Cognitive Communication Deficit, and Embolism and Thrombosis of Deep Veins of Right Lower Extremity. R45's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated March 2024 documents a physician order to cleanse Right Lateral Hip wound with gauze and 1/4 strength bleach solution, apply Gentamicin Sulfate 0.1% topical ointment to periwound and in wound tunnel. Soak roll gauze in 1/4 strength bleach solution and pack into wound after Gentamicin placed into…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for use of oxygen in the presence of electrical heating devices and flammable materials in the facility beauty shop. This failure affects two residents (R11 and R48) out of nine reviewed for accidents and safety on a sample list of 33. Findings include: On 3/5/24 at 10:40 AM, R11 was in the beauty shop wearing oxygen tubing on her face and nose and actively receiving oxygen therapy from a portable liquid oxygen tank flowing at 2 liters per minute through a nasal cannula (tube connecting the oxygen tank to the resident's nose). V7, Beauty Shop Operator, was in the process of drying R11's hair with a hand-held electric blow dryer (glowing orange electrical coils and an electric fan motor which produces sparks, ignition source) approximately one foot from R11's head. R48 was seated in a wheelchair inside the beauty shop approximately 6 feet away from R11 and the hair dryer being used by V7. R48 was also wearing oxygen tubing on her face and nose and actively receiving oxygen therapy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide complete perineal care for one resident (R8) of one resident reviewed for perineal care in the sample list of 33. Findings include: R8's undated Face Sheet documents R8's diagnosis as: Chronic Kidney Disease, Stage 2. R8's Care Plan dated 2/15/24, documents R8 is incontinent of bowel and bladder, clean perineal area with each incontinent episode. On 3/7/24 at 11:00 AM, V18 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) provided perineal care to R8. During this care, V18 wiped R8's outer labia and failed to spread the labia to wipe the inner labia. At this same time, V18 cleansed R8 buttocks but failed to clean R8's anal area. On 3/7/24 at 11:20 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated V18 should be following the perineal care policy. The facility's Perineal Care policy dated Revised 12/22, documents cleanse the outer skin folds, open all skin folds, cleanse from front to back, cleanse the anal area.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain and implement physician orders for Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine settings and cleaning schedules and failed to properly store Nebulizer tubing. These failures have the potential to affect three residents (R12, R17, R21) out of three reviewed for respiratory care on a sample list of 33. Findings include: 1. On 3/5/24 at 10:06 AM, there was a CPAP machine in R12's room next to R12's bed. On 3/5/24 at 10:20 AM, R12's Care plan focus area initiated 7/15/22 documents (R12) has OSA (Obstructive Sleep Apnea) and utilizes a CPAP machine. This Care Plan focus area documents nursing interventions for the CPAP machine include, Clean CPAP per orders. R12's medical record including R12's Physician Order Sheet, Treatment Administration Record, and Care Plan, did not contain any specific orders for pressure settings to be utilized for the CPAP machine during use, nor a cleaning schedule for R12's CPAP. On 3/5/24 at 12:54 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely assess a resident for injury following a coffee spill, document an initial wound assessment, and ensure a wound was covered with a protective dressing for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for accidents in the sample list of three. Findings include: R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R1 has Dementia with moderate cognitive impairment. R1's Care Plan dated with an initiated date of 8/14/23 documents (R1) has a skin burn of the left lateral thigh/groin r/t (related to) burn from hot coffee spilled at dinner. V18 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) written Statement dated 8/14/23 documents at 4:30 PM (on 8/13/23) a dietary staff member reported that R1 had spilled coffee and R1's pants may be wet. V18's statement documents V18 went to the dining room and did not notice R1's pants to be soiled. There is no documentation that R1's pants were changed or that R1's skin was immediately assessed for injury or that V18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ACCOLADE HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 5 of 5 | 2.8 | +2.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FREEDMAN, MOSHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 99% | since 11/01/2017 |
| CHITTY, WILLIAM | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| GROSS, NORMAN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/01/2017 |
| JARRETT, ALLISON | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 11/01/2017 |
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $359K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145449. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.