No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Accolade Healthcare Of Peoria

5600 Glen Elm Drive, Peoria, IL 61614 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 138 certified beds · (309) 693-8777 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (309) 693-8777 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5401 Knoxville Ave · (217) 383-3021 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5832 N Knoxville Ave Ste E · (309) 679-2047 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger1.1 mi
801 W Lake Ave · (309) 682-2173 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Rock Island Greenway Trl · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.2%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.8%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms73.2%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.8%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.2%18.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.9%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.2%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.6%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine50.0%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.1%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.6%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.462.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.252.221.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 210 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
14.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
41.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 41.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.7%CMS range 47.4–59.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF14.1%CMS range 10.8–17.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge41.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge25.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge92.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 3.5–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.12
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.64
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
42.0%
Total nursing turnover
31.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 129.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-06)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to ensure a resident and resident's family was provided a notification of a room move, with rational for the move, prior to transferring the resident to a different room in the facility for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of three.Findings include:On 5/4/26 at 1:30 PM, V9 (R2's Family) stated (R2) was in the facility for a few months for rehabilitation. On 2/24/26, she was out at lunch, when she came back to her room there had been a room change. There was a note and all of her things had already been moved. Later I found out that there was work that needed to be completed in her room. I was not notified of her room change. (R2) just found out when she came back to her room that was already moved. She had several room moves while in the facility and I wasn't aware of them beforehand. (R2) had confusion and was having some Dementia at times, I am her first contact and Power of Attorney. I could not be there all the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, Interview and Record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is dependent for all turning and positioning, was safely positioned in bed during cares to avoid falling, conduct vital signs and a body assessment, initiate neurological checks, notify all appropriate parties, complete a fall assessment and update a residents care plan to adequately reflect their fall risk for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for falls in the sample of three. Findings include:1. R1's Care Plan, dated 4/10/26, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses of Heart Failure, Dementia, and Parkinson's Disease, this care plan also documents (R1) is at high risk for falls related to readmission, diagnoses of Parkinson's, and Dementia.R1's Nursing Progress notes, dated 4/10/26 and completed on 4/12/26 at 9:34 PM by V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN), documents Late Entry: CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported to me that resident was on the dining room floor. This…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment. This has the potential to affect all 132 residents living in the facility.Findings include:R36's MDS/Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], documents R36's diagnoses include Alzheimer's Dementia, is severely impaired for cognition, uses a manual wheelchair, and dependent for cares. R36's current care plan documents R36 is a high risk for falls. R50's MDS, dated [DATE], documents R50's diagnoses include Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, is severely impaired for cognition, uses a wheelchair, and is dependent for care. R50's current care plan documents R50 is a high risk for falls. On 2/17/26 at 9:45am, R12's bathroom had two ceiling tiles with a brown substance on two of the corners that spread out towards the center on approximately 1/4 of each tile, and one tile was sagging down from the ceiling. The wall across from R12's bed has blue construction tape on the wallpaper where the wallpaper has been ripped down…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow enhanced barrier precautions during wound care for one of eight residents reviewed for wound care (R3) in the sample of eight. Findings include: R3's medical record documents R3 is receiving daily wound care for an unstageable pressure ulcer of the left buttock. R3's physicians Order Sheet includes the following wound care order: WOUND: left buttock- Apply (medicated solution)-soaked gauze and pat dry, apply (medicated ointment) and pack with (medicated gauze) and island border dressing daily. On 1/15/24 at 7:30am sign on R3's door stated Enhanced Barrier Precautions were in place for R3, including donning a gown and gloves when providing close contact cares. On 1/15/25 at 7:30am V3 Wound Nurse entered R3's room to perform wound care for R3's left buttock pressure ulcer. V3 did not don a gown while performing R3's wound care. V3 completed R3's wound care without wearing a protective gown. On 1/15/25 at 1:50pm, V2 DON/Director of Nursing stated Nurses should wear gowns when providing wound care. V2 stated V3 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow its policy to use facial hair beard restraints while in the kitchen, and failed to ensure food items were labeled with identification and dates. This failure has the potential to affect 121 residents who reside at the facility. Findings include: Facility's Hair Restraints Policy, Undated, documents: Guideline: Hair restraints shall be worn by all dining services staff when in food production area, dishwashing areas, or when serving food. 2. Hair restraints, hats, and/or beard guards shall be used to prevent hair from contacting exposed food. Facility's Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen) Policy, dated 2020, documents: Procedure: 1.a. All food items will be labeled. The label must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discarded. On 9/3/24 at 9:10am, V8 Dietary Aide washed dishes in the facility's kitchen; V8 did not have his facial hair beard covered. V8 Dietary Aide stated, I just know about the hairnet for head; I do not know if my beard is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans for six (R9, R22, R94, R110, R265, and R415) of 24 residents reviewed for care plan revision in a sample of 59. Findings include: Facility Care Planning, revised 6/24, documents Utilize the results of the comprehensive assessment to develop, revise and review resident's care plan. To provide a method for all staff to have needed information in caring for the residents. Each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs and strengths that will identify how the team will provide care. Facility Dialysis Protocol, revised 9/23, documents The residents care plan will reflect their dialysis needs. 1. R9's medical record documents R9 has the following diagnoses: Depression and Paranoid Schizophrenia. R9's Physician Orders for September 2024 documents the following: Fluoxetine HCl/Hydrochloride Oral Capsule 20 MG/Milligram (Fluoxetine HCl) Give 2 capsule by mouth in the morning for depression related to Depression Unspecified; Quetiapine Fumarate Oral Tablet 300 MG (Quetiapine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an appropriate indication for use of antipsychotic medications in seven residents (R22, R39, R70, R81, R102, R214, R415) with diagnosis of Dementia and failed to identify non-pharmacological interventions for two residents (R9, R110) receiving antidepressant medications of nine residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications in the sample of 59. Findings include: Facility Policy/Psychotropic Medications dated/revised 1/2024 documents: Residents will only be given antipsychotic drugs when clinically indicated according to appropriate diagnosis and physician's order. Duplicate Drug Therapy: Any drug therapy that duplicates a particular drug effect on the resident without any demonstrative therapeutic benefit. Any two or more drugs, whether from the same category or not, that have a sedative effect. Antipsychotic Drug: A neuroleptic drug that is helpful in the treatment of psychosis and has a capacity to ameliorate thought disorders. Psychotropic medications shall be used only after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the appropriate State Agency of a new diagnosis of bipolar disorder for one resident (R81) of four residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening in the sample of 59. Findings include: Current Physician's Order Summary Report indicates R81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Primary admission Diagnosis of Dementia with Other Behavioral Disturbance. R81's PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) dated 11/14/22 indicates PASRR Level I Determination: No Level II required. There is no evidence of a PASRR condition of an intellectual/developmental disability or a serious behavioral health condition. If changes occurs or new information refutes these findings, a new screen must be submitted. R81's medical record diagnosis list indicates a diagnosis of Bipolar was added on 12/12/22 and Bipolar/Hypomanic added on 5/12/23. No documentation was found or presented to indicate another Pre-admission screen was completed after addition of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to observe, assess, and document on a colostomy for one (R94) of one resident reviewed for colostomies in a sample of 59. Findings include: R94's medical record documents R94 has the following diagnoses: Ileostomy status. R94's Physician Orders for September 2024 documents the following: Ostomy: Monitor Colostomy, empty pouch when 1/3 full, change appliance every three to five days. On 9/04/24 at 2:55 PM, R94 stated I hope to get the colostomy reversed. At that same time R94 pulled down her covers and showed surveyor colostomy. R94's medical record including the TAR/treatment administration record, MAR/Medication administration record, and nurses' notes have no documentation of monitoring, assessing, or changing R94's colostomy. On 9/06/24 at 11:11AM, V1 Administrator stated, I have no documentation to give you for (R94's) outputs from her colostomy. On 9/6/24 at 12:02PM, V9 Care Plan Coordinator verified R94's medical record had no routine documentation on R94's monitoring, assessing, or changing of her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have specific dialysis orders related to the type of dialyzer, flow rate, and length of time; nephrologist; target weights; and care of the dialysis port for one (R265) of two residents reviewed for dialysis in a sample of 59. Findings include: Facility Dialysis Protocol, revised 9/23, documents To provide guidance to the facility on how to care for the dialysis resident within the facility. All residents who need dialysis will be properly cares for within the facility. It is the responsibility of nursing to provide care for the dialysis resident. Nursing will monitor the access site for signs and symptoms of infection or bleeding at the site. The residents care plan will reflect their dialysis needs. R265's medical record documents R265 has the following diagnoses: End Stage Renal Disease; and acquired absence of kidney. R265's medical record has no dialysis orders, no nephrologist listed, no post dialysis target weight, or orders to cares for R265's dialysis port. On 9/3/24 at 10:05 AM, R265 had a right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at a resident's bedside for one of 24 residents (R40) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 59. Findings Include: The Facility's Administration of Medications policy dated 8/2023 documents Residents shall receive their medications on a timely basis in accordance with state and federal guidelines and within established facility policies. Self-administration of medications is permitted when approved by the interdisciplinary team, with a written order from the primary attending physician. On 9/6/24 at 9:30 AM, R40 was lying in bed with R40's bedside table over his bed. A clear medicine cup containing 11 pills was noted on R40's bedside table. The medication cup had been tipped over with approximately half of the pills spilled out onto the table. R40 stated, This is what some of the nurses do. R40 was not able to name his medicine or state which pill was what. R40's Medical Record did not contain any assessments or physician orders for self-administration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner and responded to accommodate the residents needs for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R4) with mobility restrictions observed for call light accessibility. Findings include: On 4/24/24, R3 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation services status post lumbar fusion surgery. On 4/24/24, R3's Care plan indicates limited physical mobility related to surgical aftercare and spinal stenosis. On 5/6/24 at 12:10 PM, R3 was observed sitting in a wheelchair with Spine brace on; R3 had a hand over forehead, head down and grimacing; pulling and moving brace around and complained of pain. R3 stated We (R3 and R5 (R3's roommate) put the call light on twice. They (Certified Nurse Aides/CNA) said they would be back. At 1:04 PM, R3 was sitting in wheelchair with a back brace on R5 stated I put on the call light. They had to go find a mechanical lift. At 3:08 PM, R3 stated I'm still waiting for the gals to come put me on my side. I've been on my back since I got…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were available for resident use for 1 of 2 residents (R3) reviewed with mobility restrictions observed for call lights. Findings include: The Daily Care policy, dated 8/2/17, documented the guidelines and procedures for daily cares to all residents. The policy documented to Place call light within reach. On 4/24/24, R3 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation services status post lumbar fusion surgery. On 4/24/24, R3's Care plan indicated limited physical mobility related to surgical aftercare and spinal stenosis. On 4/24/24, The Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment documented Precaution Details: Spine Brace to be worn while patient is up doing transfers and/or ambulating. Does not need to be worn while in bed or chair. SPINAL PRECAUTIONS- NO BLT (NO BENDING, LIFTING more than 7 pounds), OR TWISTING. FALL RISK, 8/10 pain in right hip and bilateral knees. The evaluation documented R3 required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide resident-centered care for one resident (R3) who required rehabilitation services status post-surgical fusion of the lumbar spine, as evidenced by lack of physician orders for spinal precautions; no care plan intervention related to spinal precautions or back brace use; improper use of mobility devices and inadequate assessment of medication management. Findings include: R3 was admitted on [DATE] post a lumber fusion surgery and a history of Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (Heartburn/Indigestion/GERD). On 4/23/24, the facility received R3's Hospital Transfer Papers which documented Up to chair 3 (three) times per day. Spine brace (back brace designed to give support to thoracic and lumbar spine by preventing twisting and flexion (bending forward) to be worn while up ambulating. Does not need to be worn while up in chair or bed. On 4/24/24, The Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent the development of pressure ulcers or worsening of wounds for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for wound and at high risk for a pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 4/18/24. R3 had a lumber fusion surgery and required Precaution Details: Spine Brace (back brace designed to give support to thoracic and lumbar spine by preventing twisting and flexion (bending forward) to be worn while patient is up doing transfers and/or ambulating. Does not need to be worn while in bed or chair. SPINAL PRECAUTIONS- NO BLT (NO BENDING, LIFTING more than 7 pounds), OR TWISTING. FALL RISK, 8/10 pain in right hip and bilateral knees. On 4/24/24 R3's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk Assessment was documented as a 12 (twelve), high risk. On 4/24/24, R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section M documented R3 had a stage 2 pressure ulcer (resolved as of 5/6/24), a surgical wound and was at risk for a pressure ulcer. On 4/24/24, R3's Careplan documented R3 has limited physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent to perform cares for a 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for specialized equipment and spinal precautions. Findings include: R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] post a lumber fusion surgery and spinal stenosis. On 4/23/24, the facility received R3's Hospital Transfer Papers which documented Up to chair 3 (three) times per day. Spine brace (back brace designed to give support to thoracic and lumbar spine by preventing twisting and flexion (bending forward) to be worn while up ambulating. Does not need to be worn while up in chair or bed. On 4/24/24, The Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment documented Precaution Details: Spine Brace to be worn while patient is up doing transfers and/or ambulating. Does not need to be worn while in bed or chair. SPINAL PRECAUTIONS- NO BLT (NO BENDING, LIFTING more than 7 pounds), OR TWISTING. FALL RISK, 8/10 pain in right hip and bilateral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-13 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the right resident received IV (intravenous) access hydration, micronutrient therapy and failed to obtain a physician's order to administer IV hydration and micronutrient (vitamin and mineral therapy) for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for IV therapy in the sample of three. Findings include: R1's Incident Report dated 1-17-24 at 1:23 PM and signed by V2 (Director of Nursing) documents, Incident Description: (IV therapy company) inserted an IV on (R1's) right wrist. (R1) did not receive much, maybe 100 ml (milliliter). (R1) pulled IV out and was waving it around. No injuries noted. Witnesses: V9 (IV Hydration RN/Registered Nurse) statement: I (V9) got the A and B (resident) bed mixed up and when I asked (R1) her name, she said yes. V8 (IV Hydration RN) statement: I had a trainee (V9) and (V9) mixed up the A and B bed. R1's Order Summary Report and Physician's Orders dated 1-1-24 through 1-31-24 do not include an order for R1 to receive IV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently offer/provide bedtime snacks to six residents (R8, R14, R27, R43, R63, R93) which include the Resident Council President (R8) of 16 residents reviewed for bedtime snacks in the sample of 45. Findings include: Facility policy/Bedtime Snacks dated 8/2017 documents: To ensure that residents are offered bedtime snacks daily. All residents within the facility shall be offered a snack at bedtime. Charge Nurse and Nursing Assistants will offer snacks to all residents every evening prior to bedtime. On 10/11/23 at 10am, Resident group meeting was held with 16 residents. Six residents (R8, R14, R27, R43, R63, R93) including the Resident Council President (R8) stated they were not consistently offered or provided with bedtime snacks. R8, R63 and R93 stated the kitchen puts out snacks at the nurse's station but the CNA's don't consistently offer or pass out. R63 stated there have been two residents who will take all of the snacks back to their room and the staff don't replace them. On 10/12/23 at 2:40pm, V19 CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident preferred television programs were displayed on the unit television viewing area for one (R84) of 45 residents reviewed for dignity in the sample of 45. Findings include: Facility Policy/Resident Privacy and Dignity dated 8/2/17 documents: Provide all residents with a home-like environment that promotes dignity and respect to the residents of the facility. On 10/10/23 at 10:44am, R84 was sitting in the memory care television viewing area watching the television. The program on the television was a cartoon with violent and graphic content. At that time, R84 stated she did not like watching cartoons, and acknowledged the content was offensive. R84 also stated she would prefer to watch a program that didn't make her feel like a 4th grader. On 10/10/25 at 10:50am, V22 and V23 (R92's family members) entered the television viewing room with R92. At that time, V22 noted the cartoons on the television, looked over at R84, and asked her if she would rather watch a different program. R84 stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for a resident's anticoagulant and insulin medications (R359) and a resident's CPAP/continuous positive airway pressure machine (R309) for two of 25 residents (R309 and R359) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 45. Findings include: The facility's 24 Hour (Interim) Care Plan Policy revised 02/21 states, Purpose: To provide guidelines for completion of a 24-Hour (Interim) Plan of Care for newly admitted residents. A 24-Hour Care Plan guides provision of care from the time of the resident transfer/admission until the Interdisciplinary Care Plan is completed. Policy: Based on information obtained during the admission process an Interim care plan will be developed as soon as possible after admission. Responsibility: It is the responsibility of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) to develop the Interim Care Plan. It is the responsibility of the Charge Nurse/Care Plan Coordinator to complete an Interim Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain an accurate Care Plan for one resident (R12) of 25 reviewed for care plan accuracy in a total sample of 45. Findings Include: The Facility's Care Plan policy dated 6/23 documents each resident will have a plan of care to identify problems, needs and strengths that will identify how the interdisciplinary team will provide care. The resident care plan is the tool used to coordinate all care provided to the resident to be sure care is necessary, appropriate and planned to meet the individual needs of the resident consonant with the physicians plan of care. On 10/10/23 at 10:30 AM, R12 stated (Staff) don't ever get me up. I would like to be out and about more. They say I refuse but I have never refused to get up. I have never refused anything. R12's Current Care Plan, dated 8/15/22, documents (R12) has a behavior of refusing to be turned and to get up from bed. R12's medical record does not contain any documentation regarding R12 ever refusing to get out of bed or refusing to be turned while in bed. R12's MDS (Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform recommended exercises for one (R12) of four residents reviewed for mobility in a total sample of 45. Findings Include: The Facility's Range of Motion dated 9/2018 documents the purpose of the policy is to provide resident with limited range of motion appropriate treatment and services to increase or prevent further decrease range of motion. Policy: all residents will be assessed on admission and quarterly, or more often as a change of condition warrants, for risk factors for development of contractures. A program will be developed based on the resident's unique risk factors and involving formalized therapy as applicable. Any ROM will be reflected in the interdisciplinary care plan and will be systematically and consistently followed. It is the responsibility of the CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) to perform exercises as identified. R12's Therapy to Nursing Recommendations, dated 8/25/22, documents Passive Range of Motion to (Both) Lower Extremities 2-3 times per week to prevent contracture formation. Encourage Active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions were maintained for a resident with a Gastrostomy Tube/G-Tube and the facility failed to wear gloves while administering medications through a G-Tube for one of three residents (R359) reviewed for gastrostomy tubes in the sample of 45. Findings include: The facility's Tube Feeding (Administration of Medication) Policy dated 8/2017 states, Procedure: 4. Wash hands. Apply gloves. The facility's Gloves (Use) Policy revised 8/20 states, Policy: Gloves will be used per Standard Precautions, isolation precautions, and according to the CDC/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines. Gloves will be worn to prevent the spread of infection and disease to residents and employees, protect wounds from contamination, protect hands from potentially infectious materials, and to prevent exposure to the HIV/Human Immunodeficiency Virus (AIDS) acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and Hepatitis B viruses from blood or body fluids. Procedure: 4. Nonsterile gloves should be used…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain orders for a CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) use for one (R309) of one residents reviewed for oxygen use in a sample of 45. Findings include: Facility Oxygen Administration, revised 2/21, documents Oxygen therapy will be administered to the resident only upon the written order of a licensed physician. R309's facility record documents an admission date of 10/2/23, and R309 has the diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. R309's Inventory of Personal Effects, undated, documents CPAP. R309's Medication Review Report dated 10/11/23 has no documented orders for R309's CPAP. On 10/10/23 at 11:10am and 10/12/23 at 9:19am, R309's room had an oxygen sign on door, and R309's CPAP was on the right side of her bed. On 10/10/23 at 11:10am, R309 stated I take care of my own CPAP and wear it at night, I have had it since I got here. On 10/12/23 at 9:40am, V11 Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN stated I don't work midnights so I would not sign off on the CPAP. There is no order for (R309's) CPAP. On 10/12/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered narcotic medication for pain control was available on admission for one (R260) of three residents reviewed for pain in a sample of 45. Findings include: The facility's Management of Pain policy, revised 8/19, documents Policy: Our mission is to facilitate resident independence, promote resident comfort and preserve resident dignity. The purpose of this policy is to accomplish that mission through an effective pain management program, providing our residents the means to receive necessary comfort, exercise greater independence, and enhance dignity and life involvement. We will achieve these goals through: Promptly and accurately assessing and diagnosing pain. Increasing comfort and reducing depression and anxiety in residents. On 10/10/23, at 10:15am, R260 is lying in bed with a cast noted to his right leg. R260 stated the following: (On admission) I had to wait for pain medication (Oxycodone) to get here. It is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate indication for use of an antipsychotic medication for one resident (R25) with a diagnosis of Dementia and failed to ensure prn (as needed) physician orders for an anti-anxiety medication did not exceed 90 days for one resident (R92) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 45. Findings include: Facility Policy/Antipsychotic Drugs dated 8/2017 documents: Residents will not receive antipsychotic medications unless they have one or more of the following specific conditions: Schizophrenia Schizo-Affective Disorder Delusional Disorder Psychotic Mood Disorders (including Mania and Depression with Psychotic features) Acute Psychotic Episodes Brief Reactive Psychosis Schizophreniform Disorder Atypical Psychosis Tourette's Syndrome Huntington's Disease Organic Mental Syndromes (Delirium, Dementia, Amnestic) with associated psychotic and/or agitated behaviors which: Have been qualitatively and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician ordered laboratory results for one of 25 residents (R359) reviewed for physician orders in the sample of 45. Findings include: The facilities Anticoagulant Therapy Policy dated 08/02/2017, states, Policy; All residents on anticoagulant therapy shall have their medications monitored monthly, unless otherwise ordered by a physician. Procedure: 1. All residents on Coumadin should have an order for a monthly prothrombin time (unless ordered sooner by MD/Medical Doctor.) R359's current admission Record documents R359's diagnoses to included but not limited to: Permanent Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. R359's Medication Review Report, dated 9/04/2023 to 10/31/2023, documents R359 is currently prescribed the blood thinning medication Warfarin Sodium daily for DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis) prevention. This same report documents an order for an INR (International Normalized Ratio) to be obtained on 10/10/23. As of 10/11/2023 at 12:45PM, R359's PT (Prothrombin Time)/INR/Coumadin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their facility policy, and ensure that a resident had a physician order for medications that were stored at the bedside along with an assessment for self-administration of medications for two of four residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for self-administration of medication in a sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Self-Administration of Medication Policy dated 8/2017 documents it is the responsibility of the Interdisciplinary Team/IDT to assess and determine if those residents who request to self-medicate can do so. This same policy states, Procedure: A resident may not be permitted to administer or retain any medication in his/her room unless so ordered by the physician. 2. Should the resident's attending physician permit the resident to administer his/her medications, the following conditions will apply: A. The IDT will evaluate the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual ability to self-medicate using the Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy and obtain initial wound measurements, obtain physician orders for treatment of a skin impairment and to ensure a wound was monitored for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for wounds in the sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Skin and Wound Management Guidelines dated 4/2023 states, The facility will initiate aggressive wound management for those residents who have pressure injuries, vascular or diabetic wounds, surgical wounds, etc. This same policy documents for residents who have a wound on admission, the staff/licensed nurse will ensure there is a treatment order in place to include: wound site, how the area will be cleansed, type of treatment, frequency of treatment/dressing change, and periwound orders if needed. This same policy states, Wound Care Nurse: Review new admissions and readmissions and assess, measure, photograph, and document in Wound Rounds on any wound identified. This includes Stage I, significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-09 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a urinary drainage bag was placed in a privacy cover to maintain resident dignity for two of five residents (R18) and (R21) in a sample of 39. Findings Include: (R18's) Order Summary Report, dated 9/8/2022, documents Supra pubic catheter 16 French 10cc(Cubic Centimeters). (R21's) Order Summary Report, dated 9/8/2022, documents 16 French/10ml (Milliliter) Foley/catheter. On 9/6/2022, 9/7/2022 and 9/8/2022 (R18) and (R21's) urinary drainage bags were observed not to have a privacy cover over the urinary drainage bags. On 9/8/2022 at 10:30AM V10/LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated, Yes, (R21's) urinary drainage bag should have a privacy cover on it. On 9/8/2022 at 10:40AM V11 (R21's) brother stated, I am here every day to visit, and I have never seen any kind of cover over (R21's) foley drainage bag. On 9/8/2022 at 11:00AM V3/ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated, (R18's) urinary drainage bag should have a cover over it. On 9/8/2022 at 11:15AM (R18) stated, There has never been a cover over my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident wheelchairs were clean for one (R13) of 39 residents reviewed for homelike environment in the sample of 39. Findings include: The Cleaning of Equipment (wheelchairs) policy dated 7/1/22, documents non-removable covers and fabrics on your wheelchair can be vacuumed and then wiped down with disinfectant wipes or a damp cloth and left to dry. In the case of accidental spills and stains, cleaning with disinfectant wipes or a damp cloth may help until a more thorough wash can be completed. There is shared accountability between Environmental Services (EVS) and nursing home-based unit staff to ensure that wheelchairs are appropriately and consistently cleaned. The Resident Council Minutes dated 6/27/22 at 1:30 PM, documents Housekeeping/Laundry - Residents stated concerns with cleanliness. On 9/6/22 at 10:45 AM, R13 was sitting in her room in her (reclining, high back) wheelchair. The front wheel on the resident's right side had a large amount of hair wrapped around the wheel where the wheel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion was provided appropriate treatment and services to maintain and/or prevent a further decrease for two of five residents (R36 and R106) reviewed for limited range of motion in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R36's Minimum Data Set Assessment (dated 06/15/22) Section G, Functional Status, documents R36 has impairment on one side of both her upper and lower extremities. R36's Contracture Risk Evaluation (dated 07/02/22) documents a score of 7, indicating R36 is a high risk for contracture development. R36's current medical record has no documentation of any type of restorative/range of motion program in place. On 09/07/22 at 1:15 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) confirmed that R36 does not have any type of restorative/range of motion program in place and stated, We don't have a restorative program here. If a resident exhibits a decline, then therapy will pick them up. 2. On 09/06/22 at 1:15 PM, R106 was sitting in a wheelchair near his bed. R106 had a mechanical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize a severe weight loss, develop a care plan, implement new interventions and notify a registered dietician or physician of a severe weight loss for one of three residents (R96) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 39. Findings include: The facility's Weights policy, dated 7/2021, documents It is the responsibility of the Director of Nursing/ Designee to ensure that weights are obtained on a monthly basis, and to review weights for weight variances, and proper notification of physician and registered dietician if required. When a resident is noted to have a weight loss, there should be immediate intervention by Dietary. A house supplement of fortified foods can be offered to the residents who are receiving a Regular Diet, regardless of consistency, without obtaining a physician's order. This residents who are receiving a Therapeutic Diet (such as): Low Sodium, Low Fat, ADA (American Diabetes Association), Calorie Count, etcetera, require a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-10-13 · tag F0575 — widespread
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post State Agency contact information. This failure has the potential to affect all 113 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 10/11/23 at 10am, Resident group meeting was held with 16 residents. Six residents (R8, R14, R27, R43, R63, R93), including the Resident Council President (R8), all stated they did not know where the State Agency information was posted. On 10/11/23 and 10/12/23 State Agency information was only posted in the foyer area of the facility. The foyer access was only accessible by going through double doors to enter the foyer from within the facility, or entrance/exit doors on the other side of the foyer. On both days of observation, the foyer area was mostly accessed by visitors, vendors, and staff. This area was not consistently accessed by the majority of residents in the facility. On 10/12/23 at 1:15pm, V1 Administrator toured the facility and acknowledged that there were no other State Agency signs posted within the facility and stated The State Agency posters should be posted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ACCOLADE HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
FREEDMAN, MOSHEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER90%since 02/01/2022
FREEDMAN, SHMUELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 02/01/2022
WILLIAMS, TASHAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 02/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$617K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 8%Other / private 22%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $617K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$302per resident / day
operating cost
$9,167per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$296per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145039. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next