Parc Joliet
222 North Hammes, Joliet, IL 60435 · For profit - Corporation · 203 certified beds · (815) 725-0443 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $25,830 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-13)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.7% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.6% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 97.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.2% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.2% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.0% | 18.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.7% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 21.1% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.3% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.25 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.86 | 2.22 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 10.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.4%CMS range 32.1–58.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.2–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 10.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 12.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 10.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.0–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.24 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 203 beds and averages 153.2 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse. This failure applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing inappropriate physical assault when a visitor entered her room, unzipped his pants, and placed an item into her mouth and resulted in R1 experiencing inappropriate physical contact and assault. The findings include: R1's electronic medical records show she is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses and conditions including early onset Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder and impaired communication who was admitted to the facility May 11, 2024.On June 23, 2026, at 11:00 AM, R1 was lying in her bed in her room unable to speak, with her upper and lower extremities contracted. R1 was clinching her teeth and opened her eyes wide in response when spoken to. R1 had an anxious expression on her face while observing the surveyor walking near or around her bed.R1's current care plan-initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident safely with a mechanical lift. This failure resulted in a resident sustaining an 8 cm (centimeter) laceration, requiring 11 sutures.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for mechanical lift transfers in a sample of 3.The findings include:On 2/11/26 at 10:21, V4 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) said she transferred R1 from his wheelchair to his bed with mechanical lift by herself on 1/15/26 when he sustained a skin tear. V4 said R1 has always had extreme anxiety with patient care and he freaks out when he is transferred with mechanical lift. V4 said, I am thinking maybe when I transferred him, from him freaking out and shaking, he might have bumped his leg on the bed at that point. V4 said she was taught there should be two staff when transferring a resident with a mechanical lift, but she did it by herself because she thought R1 was so light and easy to do. V4 said there should always be two staff for safety precautions when transferring a resident with a mechanical lift; one staff member is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer a resident from the bed to the chair. This failure resulted in R4 experiencing a right humeral neck fracture when the mechanical lift R4 was attached to tipped over and R4 struck the wall in her room. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 33. The findings include:On August 25, 2025, at 10:25 AM, R4 was sitting in the chair with an ice pack over her right shoulder area. R4 said, The other day I was up in the sling of the mechanical lift. The staff were transferring me to the dialysis chair from my bed when the entire [mechanical lift] tipped over with me in it. I slammed into the wall in my room hard, then the chair, and then the floor. My whole body ended up on the floor, still attached to the [mechanical lift]. I had very bad pain in my right shoulder. The [mechanical lift] machine also fell on one of the staff and she was pinned under the lift and my whole body. I went to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident with impaired cognition while drinking a hot beverage. This failure resulted in the resident spilling the hot beverage, sustaining burns to her bilateral thighs and was transferred to hospital for treatment of the same. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents and supervision in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet showed that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis, Dysarthria and Anarthria, Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Anxiety Disorder, Insomnia, Diseases of Spinal Cord. R1's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated February 28, 2025 showed that R1 was severely impaired in cognition and required supervision or touching assistance for eating. Facility Incident logs showed that R1 had a hot liquid burn on March 10, 2025. Facility discharge records and nurses progress notes showed that R1 was discharged to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to submit an accurate and complete abuse investigation report to the state agency.This failure applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse.The findings include:R1's electronic medical records show she is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses and conditions including early onset Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder and impaired communication who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].On June 23, 2026, at 11:00 AM, R1 was lying in her bed in her room unable to speak, with her upper and lower extremities contracted and clinching her teeth in response when spoken to. R1's eyes widened in response to being spoken to and had an anxious expression on her face while observing the surveyor walking near or around her bed. On June 23, 2026, at 11:16 AM, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) said sometime in the afternoon on June 10, 2026, she saw V7 (R1's visitor), a man she did not recognize, walking down the hall towards R1's room. V5 said she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide evidence to the state agency that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated.This failure applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse.The findings include: R1's electronic medical records show she is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses and conditions including early onset Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder and impaired communication who was admitted to the facility May 11, 2024.On June 23, 2026, at 11:00 AM, R1 was lying in her bed in her room unable to speak, with her upper and lower extremities contracted and clinching her teeth in response when spoken to. R1's eyes widened in response to being spoken to and had an anxious expression on her face while observing the surveyor walking near or around her bed.R1's current care plan-initiated May 13, 2024, shows she is totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, requires two staff to turn and reposition, is non-ambulatory, non-verbal.On June…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report a resident's injury of unknown origin within required timeframes.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse concerns.The findings include:Camera footage from [DATE] showed around 7:35 PM, R1 and V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) were standing in front of the elevators, the doors opened, and R1 pushed V4 into the elevator. The footage showed that V4 grabbed R1's right arm and then jerked R1's right arm, pulling R1 into the elevator. The footage then showed R1 was transported to the hospital around 8:01 PM. R1's [DATE] emergency room records showed that R1 arrived at the hospital with a swollen upper lip and dried blood on his lip. On [DATE] at 1:15 pm, V8 (CNA) said that she saw blood on R1's mouth after the incident but she did not know where the blood was coming from.On [DATE] at 2:48 pm, V3 (Nurse), who was R1's nurse at the time, said that she saw blood on R1's lip after the incident but she did not attend to or assess R1. R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to investigate the cause of a resident's injury.This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for unknown injury.The findings include:R1's 4/11/26 Minimum Data Set showed that his cognition is severely impaired.R1's 5/6/2026 8:17 PM progress notes showed that R1 was being aggressive towards a nurse and a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and was transported to the local community hospital for a psychological evaluation.On 5/14/2026, the facility's camera footage of 5/6/26 from 4:00 pm to 8:05 PM was reviewed. The footage from 7:35 pm to 7:59 PM showed R1 was attempting to leave the facility by means of the elevator and the stairway and staff were intervening. The footage showed that around 7:35 PM, R1 and V4 CNA were standing in front of the elevators when the doors opened, and R1 pushed V4 into the elevator. The footage showed V4 grabbed R1's right arm and then jerked it, pulling R1 into the elevator. On 5/14/26 at 1:15 pm, V8 (CNA) said afterwards she saw blood on R1's mouth but she did not know where the blood was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical records contained documentation to support new diagnoses of schizophrenia.This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for behavior documentation.The findings include:1. R3's Face Sheet showed she is a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility 12/09/2024 with diagnoses that include bipolar disorder and alcohol abuse. The Face Sheet showed a diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder was added to R3's diagnosis list on 10/7/2025, and a new diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia was also added on 2/17/2026. R3's March 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed a 12/9/2024 order for 300 mg (milligrams) of quetiapine (an anti-psychotic medication) to be given at bedtime for bi-polar disorder. The order was discontinued on 2/17/2026. The same MAR showed the same medication at the same dosage was to be given at the same time, but for a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia, starting 2/17/2026. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was not physically abused by a staff.This applies to 1 of 10 residents (R6) reviewed for physical abuse in the sample of 10.The findings include:R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6 had multiple diagnoses including bipolar disorder, conduct disorder, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, and severe dementia with agitation, based on the face sheet.R6's admission MDS (minimum data set) dated October 1, 2025 showed that the resident was severely impaired with cognition. The same MDS showed that R6 required moderate to maximum assistance from the staff with most of her ADLs (activities of daily living).On November 21, 2025 at 11:28 AM, R6 was inside the first-floor dining room, her head resting on the dining table. R6 responds inappropriately when talked to. R6 was confused. Sitting beside R6 was V17 (CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant). V17 stated that the staff takes turn providing 1:1 supervision of R6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical and mental abuse by another resident (R3). This applies to 3 out of 5 residents (R1, R2, and R4) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse.The findings include:R3's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) said he was a 35 y.o. (year old) who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's medical diagnoses included autism, schizophrenia, anxiety, and lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood. R3's EMR said he was non-verbal and ambulatory. R3's EMR continued to say that he required supervision for safety due to aggressive behaviors of throwing items, scratching, and hitting others. 1. R2's EMR said he was 70 y.o. with medical diagnoses of right knee osteoarthritis, unspecified intellectual disability, and impaired mobility. R2's EMR said he was cognitively intact and required substantial staff assistance with transfers.On 10/31/2025 at 11:10 AM, R2 was in bed and had linear scratch…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a resident's allegation of abuse by another resident (R3).This applies to 1 out of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse.The findings include:R3's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) said he was a 35 y.o. (year old) who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's medical diagnoses included autism, schizophrenia, anxiety, and lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood. R3's EMR said he was non-verbal and ambulatory. R3's EMR continued to say that he required supervision for safety due to aggressive behaviors of throwing items, scratching, and hitting others. R1's EMR said she was 81 y.o. with medical diagnoses of a right wrist fracture, falls, anxiety, and impaired mobility. R1's EMR said she was cognitively intact and required the use of wheelchair. On 10/31/2025 at 10:40 AM, R1 was in her wheelchair. R1 said a few weeks ago, at approximately 6-7 PM, she encountered R3 in the hallway. R1 said R3 was throwing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate residents' allegations of abuse by another resident (R3). This applies to 3 out of 5 residents (R1, R2, and R4) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse.The findings include:1. On 10/31/2025 at 11:10 AM, R2 was in bed and had linear scratch marks under his right eye. R2 said on 10/27/2025 at approximately 3 AM, R3 came to his room and, without provocation started to scratch his face. R2 said he yelled for help. R2 said facility staff intervened and escorted R3 out of his room. R2 said he feared R3 would return to his room but felt safe now that R3 was discharged from the facility. R2 said R3 had a known history of aggression towards other residents and staff. On 10/31/2025 at 1 PM, V14 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) said R3 had known behaviors of throwing furniture and hurting others. V14 said R3 required constant supervision and had a 1:1 sitter for all shifts days prior, but recently the intervention was changed to only AM and PM shift. V14 said on 10/27/2025, R3 was throwing furniture in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement safety monitoring interventions for a resident with known aggressive behaviors towards others. This applies to 1 out of 4 residents (R3) reviewed for safety and supervision.The findings include:R3's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) said he was a 35 y.o. (year old) who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's medical diagnoses included autism, schizophrenia, anxiety, and lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood. R3's EMR said he was non-verbal and ambulatory. R3's EMR continued to say that he required supervision for safety due to aggressive behaviors of throwing items, scratching, and hitting others. R3's care plan initiated on 8/14/2025 said family reports known aggressive behavior towards others, of throwing, scratching, and hitting others. The care plan said the family to provide a 1:1 sitter. R3's reviewed and updated behavior care plan dated 9/22/2025 said his behavior intervention still required a 1:1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and served under sanitary conditions. This failure applies to 144 residents who are served food from the kitchen. Findings include:On September 25, 2025, at 3:59 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated out of 147 residents in the facility, there are 144 residents receiving food from the kitchen.On September 23, 2025, at 10:39 AM, Upon entering the kitchen V15 (Cook) was standing at the food prep table handling food prep items then donned gloves without performing hand hygiene.On September 23, 2025 at 10:41 AM In the kitchen, V16 (Dietary Aide)collected and rinsed soiled dishes, placed them in a dish rack and into the low temp dishwasher, then collected clean dishes from the dishwasher without performing hand hygiene; after pulling a rack of clean dishes from the dishwasher V16 grabbed a towel from the top of a box of latex gloves sitting in a part of the dish washing machine, wiped the water out of multiple bowls…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents shower room was free of black substances and failed to ensure that a resident's toilet was in good repair.This applies 16 of 16 residents (R24, R47, R58, R85, R92, R101, R103, R104, R105, R138, R140, R144, R149, R150, R156, and R164) reviewed for homelike environment in the sample of 29. Findings include:1. On September 22, 2025 at 10:20 AM, R58 was in her room alert and oriented and stated that the exhaust fan in the shower down the hall from her doesn't work, and she saw sparks come from it a month ago. R58 stated that there is also mold in the same shower all along the edge of shower. On September 23, 2025 R58 stated she told a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) about the mold and the shower but she doesn't know their name. R58 stated the sparks had been there 4-5 months. R58 stated, because the fan hasn't been fixed yet, R58 tells all the staff not to turn on the fan when they help her with a shower. On September 22, 2025 at 10:50 AM, in the shower room down R58's hall, there is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene and bed bath or shower.This applies to 6 of 7 residents (R6, R38, R49, R50, R52 and R137) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living), in the sample of 29.The findings include:1.According to the Electronic Medical Records (EMR), R137 has multiple diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease (Stroke) with right side paralysis affecting dominant side, abnormality of gait and mobility, Alzheimer's disease and dementia. The (MDS) Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], showed R137 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance for personal hygiene, and dressing. R137's Care Plan for (ADL) Activities of Daily Living self-care deficit initiated on March 24, 2025, showed R137 requires moderate to maximum assistance with dressing and grooming tasks. On September 22, 2025, at 11:07 AM R137 was sitting in the dining room in her wheelchair. R137's shirt had crumbs of food, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who smoke and require supervision for smoking were monitored closely during smoking period. In addition, facility also failed to ensure that residents are not keeping their own cigarette lighters. This applies to 6 of 8 residents (R26, R71, R75, R110, R151, R164) reviewed for smoking in the sample of 29. The findings include:On September 23, 2025, at 3:35 PM, V23 (Activity Aide) was in the dining/dayroom near the door of the back patio handing cigarettes to residents during smoke time. V23 was the only staff supervising the smoking period. Glass windows/walls with horizontal window blinds separated the dayroom from the back patio area. However, V23 was only intermittently looking outside through the glass window to monitor the residents who were smoking. R110 was observed in the back patio smoking and carrying a lighter. R110 lit up another cigarette with this lighter and then put the cigarette lighter in her pocket when she finished smoking and walked back inside the facility without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices with regards to hand hygiene during range of motion assessments and administration of insulin. In addition, the facility failed to wear complete PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) during provision of wound treatment and administration of intravenous (IV) medication for residents who are under Enhance Barrier Precaution (EBP). This applies to 5 of 6 residents (R9, R29, R50, R135, R163) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 29. The findings include: 1.According to the face sheet, R163 has multiple diagnoses including, cellulitis of right lower limb, local infection of skin and subcutaneous tissue, quadriplegia and history of other venous thrombosis and embolism. R163's POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated September 22, 2025, showed an active order for a (PICC) Peripherally Inserted Central Line Catheter to (RUE) Right Upper Extremity. On September 23, 2025, at 9:02 AM, V22 (Registered Nurse) was preparing R163's (IV) intravenously medication, Ceftriaxone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a demented male resident from kissing a demented female resident. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R148) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 29.Findings include: R148's admission record showed her to be a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses that included unspecified severe dementia with mood disturbances, depression, anxiety and congestive heart failure. R148's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated July 22, 2025 showed her to be severely cognitively impaired with a BIMS score of zero. R148's care plan showed the following: R148 is disoriented to person, place and time related to dementia diagnosis. R73's admission record showed him to be [AGE] years old with diagnoses that include dementia, bipolar, traumatic brain injury, paranoid schizophrenia. R73'BIMS score of 1, showed him to be severely cognitively impaired. R73 criminal background checks showed he had a history of aggravated domestic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that updated PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Record Review) referrals were completed when new psychiatric diagnoses were identified after admission.This applies to for 3 of 3 residents (R10, R35, R61) reviewed for PASRR compliance in the sample of 29.The findings include: 1.R61 was admitted on [DATE]. The PASRR Level I, dated October 30, 2023, indicated: No Level II Required - No SMI/ID/RC (Severe Mental Illness/Intellectual Disability/Related Condition.) The rationale stated: There is no evidence of a PASRR condition. If changes occur or new information refutes these findings, a new screen must be submitted.Review of medical diagnosis showed diagnoses of bipolar disorder, Schizophrenia, and Depression were created on November 03, 2025. No updated PASRR referral was completed.The resident's care plan dated March 18, 2025, showed, Resident is an adult living with chronic mental illness. Resident has been screened through the outside screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly cleanse a resident's skin prior to application of skin treatment and failed to ensure that psychotropic medication was administered as ordered. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R52, R121) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 29. The findings include:1. On September 23, 2025, at 9:36 AM, V4 (Wound Care Nurse) assessed R52's skin while V6 was providing incontinence care. There was multiple striation of redness all over on R52's backside and buttocks. There was a yellow stain noted on the fitted sheet right by R52's upper back. V6 said that the stain came from the fluids that was secreting from R52's skin. There were also clumps of dead skin scattered all over R52's backside and buttocks. V4 said that R52 has history of fungal rash on his back that's why he is receiving Nystatin ointment. V4 applied the Nystatin ointment without ensuring that R52's back was cleansed. On September 23, 2025, at 10:06 AM, V4 and V5 (Both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and provide orthotic devices and services to residents, to prevent further reduction in mobility and ROM (range of motion).This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R12 and R123) reviewed for limited ROM, in the sample of 29.The findings include:1. R12 had multiple diagnoses including, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, cerebral infraction due to thrombosis of left middle cerebral artery and severe morbid obesity due to excess calories, based on the face sheet.R12's annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 29, 2025 showed that the resident was cognitively intact. The same MDS showed that R12 had functional limitation in ROM to one side of both upper and lower extremities.On September 22, 2025 at 11:20 AM, R12 was in bed, alert and oriented. R12 had right arm and hand weakness. R12 was having a hard time to move her right arm and hand without the help of the left hand. R12 stated that she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that continuous oxygen therapy was consistently provided and monitored as ordered.This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R35) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 29.The findings include: R35's medical diagnosis list created on January 17, 2024, shows multiple diagnosis including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and shortness of breath.The Physician's Order Sheet includes an order dated January 17, 2024, to administer oxygen at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously every shift to maintain SpO (Oxygen Saturation) greater than 90% related to COPD. Additional orders included oxygen saturation monitoring and oxygen equipment maintenance.On September 22, 2025, at 10:27 AM, R35 was observed sitting on the edge of the bed watching television with oxygen in place at 3 liters per minute via nasal cannula. When asked about portable oxygen use, R35 stated they did not have a portable tank and that they were supposed to remain on oxygen all the time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered during medication administration observation. There were 25 medication administration opportunities with 2 errors resulting to 8% percent medication error rate.This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R147 and R163) reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 29.The findings include:1.According to the face sheet, R147 has multiple diagnoses including, bilateral secondary cataract, presence of intraocular lense, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart disease.R147's POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated September 20, 2025, showed an active order for FML Litquifilm Opthalmic Suspension 0.1% (Fluorometholone), instill 1 drop in both eyes one time a day for episcleritis (an inflammation in the eyes).On September 23, 2025, at 9:25 AM, V22 (Registered Nurse) administered the eye drops, FML Litquifilm Opthalmic Suspension 0.1% (Fluorometholone) to R147 in each eye. The eye drops instructions on the medication label showed, shake well before each use. V22 failed to shake the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that couches inside resident rooms were clean and sanitary and in accordance with what a resident would expect in a clean homelike environment. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R2, R5 and R6) reviewed for housekeeping issues in the sample of 11. The findings include:On September 12, 2025 at 1:59 PM, the couch inside R2's room had multiple dark stains on the seat cushion area. V2 (Director of Nursing) who was present stated that R2's couch had dark stains and that the said couch needed to be cleaned.On September 12, 2025 at 2:33 PM, the couch inside R6's room had multiple white stains on the seat cushion area. V2 who was present stated that R6's couch needed to be cleaned because of the white stains.On September 12, 2025 at 2:40 PM, the couch inside R5's room had multiple dark stains on the seat cushion area and on the arm rest. V2 who was present stated R5's couch had multiple dark stains and added that R5's couch needed to be cleaned.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure mechanical lift devices are maintained in safe, operating condition, are routinely inspected, and removed from service when repairs are needed. This applies to 30 of 30 residents (R4-R33) reviewed for mechanical lift transfers in the sample of 33. The findings include:The facility provided a list of all residents residing in the facility who require the use of a mechanical lift device for transfers between surfaces. The undated list shows R4-R33 require the use of a full-body mechanical lift for transfers between surfaces. On August 25, 2025, at 9:50 AM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing), and V1 (Administrator) said there was an incident at the facility on July 28, 2025 involving R4 and a mechanical lift. V2 said, The wheel on the [mechanical lift] buckled. It fell enough for [R4] to hit her shoulder on the wall and break a bone. On August 25, 2025 at 1:36 PM, V7 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) said, I was getting [R4] up for dialysis on July 28, 2025. Another CNA was with me. We used the [mechanical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for resident-to-resident assault in the sample of 33. The findings include:On August 21, 2025 at 1:05 PM, R3 was lying in bed in his room. R3's right eyelid was closed/drooping, and some redness was noted on his cheek below his right eye. R3 said, I was punched in the eye by another resident. I don't know why he hit me. I went to the hospital. It doesn't hurt anymore. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis of the left side following cerebral infarction, asthma, abnormal gait and mobility, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, delusional disorders, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and anemia. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated May 15, 2025 shows R3 has severe cognitive impairment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record regarding a resident's incident during a mechanical lift transfer. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for falls in the sample of 33. The findings include:On August 25, 2025, at 10:25 AM, R4 was sitting in the chair with an ice pack over her right shoulder area. R4 said, The other day I was up in the sling of the mechanical lift. The staff were transferring me to the dialysis chair from my bed when the entire [mechanical lift] tipped over with me in it. I slammed into the wall in my room hard, then the chair, and then the floor. My whole body ended up on the floor, still attached to the [mechanical lift]. I had very bad pain in my right shoulder. The [mechanical lift] machine also fell on one of the staff and she was pinned under the lift and my whole body. I went to the hospital, and they said I broke my arm by my shoulder. The facility's incident report dated July 28, 2025 shows, Floor nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from abuse. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R4, R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 14. The findings include: The facility's 2/12/2025 final Facility Incident Investigation Report for R4 and R5 showed .it was determined that on 2/5/25, [R4] was sitting outside .he saw [R5] come outside, and he called him a mooch. [R5] overheard [R4] and in reaction, he went towards the latter. As [R5] approached, he swung at [R4] and missed, lost his balance, and his momentum caused both residents to land on the ground [R5] had a scrape on his left forearm .[R4] had scratches on the right side of his face . The Report showed that both residents are alert and oriented and are responsible for themselves. On 2/25/25 at 10:40 AM, R4 in his room. R4 had just returned from an appointment and his gait and steps were a little bouncy and unsteady. R4 stated R5 always asked for cigarettes and money and R5 still owed him three dollars. R4 stated that on 2/12/2025 before their altercation, R4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare and dress a resident appropriately for an outside appointment. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accommodation of resident needs. The findings include: The facility's Clinical Communications-Facility Bulletin Board section of the Electronic Medical Record system showed R1 had an apponitment on 12/18/2024, and the notification included .10 AM pick up by [ambulance] going by AMB 9 AM pick up. On 12/24/24 at 7:30, AM V10 (R1's Guardian) stated that R1 was not properly dressed for the appointment. V10 stated R1 was dirty and only had a gown on, and was covered only with a sheet and no blanket. V10 also stated R1 was 40 minutes late to the appointment. On 12/24/24 at 8:45 AM, R1 was in a low bed with bolsters bilaterally and a floor mat was in place. R1 had contractures on both hands and he wore a hospital gown. R1 was unable to be interviewed due to his nonverbal status. R1's 10/3/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed he is dependent on staff for his activities of daily living. On 12/24/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions for 2 residents (R3, R5) who are at risk for falls in a sample of 5. The findings include: 1. R3's electronic health records showed she has a history of falls, including on 10/5/24. R3's 9/6/24 care plan shows she is at risk for falls with interventions in place including provide resident a reacher for safety reaching items, and fall update of 5/25/24 showed apply the specialized mat to wheelchair for safety. R3's 10/21/24 MDS (Minimum Data Set) showed R3's decision making is impaired. On 10/30/24 at 3:15 pm, R3 was observed in the dining room, and she did not have her reacher with her. The staff, V4 and V5 (Certified Nurses Assistants), brought R3 to her room. V4 and V5 stood R3 up and showed R3 did not have a specialized seating mat on the seat of her wheelchair. V5 said she has worked with R3 a lot including last Monday (2 days prior), and has never seen R3 with a (specialized seating) mat on her wheelchair seat. On 10/30/24 at 3:40 pm, V8 (Activities Director) said she had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label/date/seal/store items, remove expired items, and clean and address standing water by drain to avoid flies in the kitchen. This applies to all residents that receive oral nutrition and foods prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (Form CMS-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-671), dated 9/3/24, documents the total census was 153 residents. On 9/5/24 at 11:31 AM, V22 (Social Services) verified the facility has 3 strict NPO (Nothing By Mouth) residents; all other residents eat from the facility kitchen. On 9/3/24, starting at 10:34 AM, the facility kitchen was toured in the presence of V16 (Dietary Manager) and the following was found: In the refrigerator: 1. 24 fresh whole eggs with no date. 2. A medium sized silver bin of unlabeled and undated ground meat. V16 said he thought it was ground turkey. In the dry storage: 3. Standing water by drain in the floor located next to the door/entrance to the dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide call light access to residents, a functioning and useable bariatric shower bed, and a proper-sized incontinent brief for residents. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R7, R35, R39, and R78) reviewed for reasonable accommodation of needs in a sample of 35. The Findings Includes: 1. R7 is a [AGE] year-old male with severe cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R7 was admitted with diagnoses including falls, anxiety, depression, alcohol abuse, restlessness, and agitation. On 9/3/24 at 12:17 PM, R7 was in his bed sitting at the bedside and tried to put the call light on. The call light string was not connected to the call system to trigger the call. R7's call light string was observed tied to his roommate's (R78) call light string. 2. R78 is a [AGE] year-old male with severe cognitive impairment as per the MDS dated [DATE]. R78 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, need for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. R20's 7/19/24 MDS (Minimum Data Set) showed her cognition is intact, and her MDS section GG showed she needs assistance for personal hygiene. R20's 8/8/23 care plan showed a self-care deficit (ADLs/Mobility) (assistance in daily living) related to diagnoses including type 2 Diabetes, insomnia, anemia, osteoarthritis, and hypertension with interventions including supervision or touching assistance with ADL tasks. On 09/03/24 at 11:26 AM, R20 was observed with long jagged fingernails. R20 said it has been months since she has had them cut and she would like for the staff to cut them. On 09/05/24 at 10:38 AM, V1 (Administrator) said R20's nails should not have been long and jagged. V1 said the nails should be trimmed and clean for safety, dignity, and for infection control. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinence care and grooming assistance to dependent residents. This applies to 6 of 8 residents (R20, R34, R39, R87, R92 and R128) reviewed for incontinence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely foot care to meet the needs of all residents. This applies to 4 resident (R46, R35, R20, and R13) reviewed for podiatry services in a sample of 35 residents. The findings include: 1. R46's Face sheet shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with primary diagnosis of quadriplegia. R46's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/1/24, shows her cognition is intact, she has impairments to both upper and lower extremities, and she requires maximal assistance for personal hygiene. R46's Care Plan, initiated on 10/11/2023, shows she has self-care deficit due to quadriplegia. Interventions include provide max assistance with grooming tasks. R46's last and only podiatry note was reviewed from visit date of 2/27/24. Podiatrist wrote R46 presented with thick, discolored, dystrophic nails. Podiatrist trimmed R46's nails and wrote for follow up visit in 9 weeks. A 9 week follow up visit would have occurred on or around 4/30/24, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to inform, provide written information, and formulate Advanced Directives upon admission for 1 resident (R116) in a sample of 35. The findings include: R116 is a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the larynx, spinal stenosis, dysphagia oral pharyngeal phase, suicidal ideations, anemia, and major depressive disorder. On 09/04/24 at 11:02 AM, R116 had no POLST (Physicians Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment) or Advanced Directives in his electronic health record, and the facility's Advanced Directives book showed no records for R116. R116's face sheet showed R116 was a full code, and R116's 7/22/24's Physician's order showed full code. On 09/05/24 at 08:55 AM, R116 denied ever being asked from the facility what his wishes were for life sustaining treatments in case of an emergency. R116 also denied ever signing any Advanced Directives forms. R116 said he did not want to have any life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply splints to prevent contractures. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R95 and R85) reviewed for contractures in a sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R85's electronic health record showed she is a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes, seizures, and hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy. R85's 8/15/24 MDS (Minimum Data Set) section GG showed R85 is dependent in all care. R85's 5/14/24 care plan showed resident would benefit from participation in the following restorative programs: splint right palm protector, (8/20/24-waiting for left palm protector) due to impaired cognition, and impaired communication with interventions including assistance with left palm protector, apply every morning daily. On 09/03/24 at 11:27 AM, R85 was observed in bed asleep, with both her left and right hands contracted and no devices on her hands. On 09/05/24 at 09:14 AM, R85 was observed in her bed again, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize safety interventions and maintain an environment free of trip hazards. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R14 and R135) reviewed for accidents and hazards in a sample of 35. Findings include: 1. R135 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that includes intervertebral disc displacement, hyperlipidemia, alcohol abuse, hypertension, insomnia, adult failure to thrive, history of transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction without residual deficits. R135's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 6/30/24, indicates he is cognitively intact and uses a walker for mobility. R135's MDS indicates he requires supervision or touching assistance from staff while walking. The care plan, dated 7/15/24, stated R135 is at risk for falls interventions include to anticipate and meet the individual needs of the resident. On 9/03/24 at 10:58 AM, a blower fan was in the middle of the hallway, with the electrical cord stretching past two resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide humidification with oxygen therapy to avoid nasal dryness. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R59) reviewed for respiratory therapy in a sample of 35. The Findings Includes: R59 is a [AGE] year-old female, with very mild cognitive impairment, as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE]. R59 was admitted with an admitting diagnosis, including asthma, congestive heart failure, sleep apnea, and dyspnea. On 09/03/24 at 02:22 PM, R59 was in her bed, with oxygen therapy with a nasal cannula (NC) at 2.5 liters per minute (L/M) without any humidification. On 9/5/24 at 9:45 AM, R59 was observed again in her bed, with NC at 2.5 L/M. R59 stated her nares are dry. On 09/05/24 at 11:30 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing / DON) stated, Our policy is to administer oxygen with humidification. We have couple of people refused to have humidification. I will check to see if (R59) was refusing the humidification. On 09/05/24 at 12:56 PM, R59 stated, They…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label, date, discard expired food/beverages, and complete daily temperature logs for resident's personal refrigerators. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R2 and R51) in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R2's Face Sheet showed diagnoses of asthma, chronic pain due to trauma, dysphagia, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, anxiety, epilepsy, hypertension, heart failure, and hemiplegia/hemiparesis. R2's MDS (MDS/Minimum Data Set), dated 07/19/24, showed R2 was cognitively intact. The same MDS showed R2 had an impairment on one side of her upper extremities, and an impairment on side of her lower extremities. On 09/03/24 at 11:10 AM, R2 had a personal refrigerator in her room. The refrigerator contained two cartons of chocolate milk, with an expiration date of 06/08/24 and 07/28/24. The refrigerator had one carton of white milk, with expiration date 06/08/24. R2 had two bowls of shredded cheese in the refrigerator without a date and label. R2 said the staff comes and checks the temperature of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) Guidelines by staff not wearing gowns during wound care to EBP resident,s and not having a trash can inside the resident room and near the exit for discarding PPE after removal. The facility also failed to maintain effective hand hygiene during resident care. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R95 and R124) reviewed for infection control practices in a sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R124 is a [AGE] year-old male with severe cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE]. R124 was admitted with an admitting diagnosis, including cerebral infarction, dysphagia, and gastrostomy tube (GT) feeding. On 9/4/24 at 9:58 AM, R124's entry door was observed with an EBP sign to wear gloves, gown, and mask to provide high-contact resident care activities. On 9/4/24 at 10:00 AM, V5 (Wound Care Nurse) and V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant / CNA) provided wound care to R124's sacral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and notify the State Agency of an allegation of theft. This applies to 1 of 8 residents (R1) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with moderate cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R1 was interviewed on 4/12/2024 at 10:45AM, and stated she reported to V8 (Registered Nurse/RN)a few weeks ago, that she lost $80.00 from her wallet. According to R1, V8 was the supervisor that day. On 4/12/24 at 11:25 AM, V8 stated \he charted the incident that R1 was missing her $80.00, and reported it to V13 (Social Service). On 4/12/24 at 12:55 PM, V13 stated V8 didn't notify her R1 was missing $80.00 from her wallet. V13 added when she checked with V8, he (V8) said he notified the Assistant Administrator (V2). On 4/12/24 at 3:30 PM, V2 stated V8 never notified her. On 4/12/24 at 3:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, (V8( should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and reord review, the facility failed to provide access to a call light for one resident. This applies to 1 of 25 residents (R1) reviewed for call light access in the sample of 25. The findings include: The Face Sheet for R1 shows R1 has a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular accident (CVA or stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side. R1 has incomplete use of the right side, as well. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) for R1, dated 4/4/23, shows R1 requires substantial/maximal assistance to roll side to side in the bed substantial/maximal assistance for eating and is dependent for dressing and for all transfers. On 10/23/23 at 11:26 AM, the call light cord for R1 was on the floor, out of reach of R1. At this time, R1 was in bed and stated she did not know where her call light was located. On 10/24/23 at 9:14 AM, R1 was in bed. The call light cord was clipped to the left side of R1's gown. R1 attempted to reach the cord, but could not. On 10/24/23 at 9:16 AM, V14 (LPN - Licensed Practical Nurse) stated the call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene. This applies to 3 of 4 residents (R55, R59 and R173) reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living) in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R173 had multiple diagnoses including unspecified injury at unspecified level of cervical cord and carpal tunnel syndrome, based on the face sheet. R173's progress notes, dated 10/17/23 created by the Social Service, showed the resident was cognitively intact. R173's point of care documentation showed from 10/20 through 10/24/23, the resident required moderate to maximum assistance from the staff to perform grooming task. On 10/23/23 at 10:48 AM, R173 was in bed, alert, oriented, and verbally responsive. R173 had bilateral wrist/hand splints in place. R173's fingernails were long, jagged and with black substances underneath. R173 stated, Oh yes, it definitely needs cut and cleaning. Whatever you can do for me, I will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow doctor's order to schedule for a resident a doctor's office visit for an out-patient procedure. This affected 1 of 1 resident (R100) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 25. The findings include: Review of R100's face sheet documents a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Injury at C4 level of Cervical Spinal Cord, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Abnormalities of Gait, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. On 10/23/23 at 10:52 AM, R100 stated he does not know why he still has an indwelling urinary catheter. R100's Physician order, dated 3/16/23, showed the following: Please schedule [a] follow up appointment with Urology for out-patient cystoscopy. On 10/24/23 at 4:30 PM, V5 (Activities Director) stated the last appointment R100 had was a neurology appointment in January of 2023. V5 stated there are no other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's toenails that were extremely overgrown were cut by the podiatrist. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R67) reviewed for foot care in the sample of 25. The findings include: Review of R67's face sheet documents a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, need for assistance with personal care, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Seizures, Cerebral infarction without residual deficits. On 10/23/23 at 11:00 AM, R67 was noted to be in bed with bare uncovered feet. R67's toe nails were noted to be long and needing to be cut. R67 stated she needs her toenails cut. On 10/25/23 at 09:06 AM, V10 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated the podiatrist comes to the facility and cuts the toenails of residents. V10 stated there is a list of residents who need to see the podiatrist. According to the podiatrist list, R67 was last placed on the list to be seen on 2/14/2023. R67 was not on the current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide perineal and indwelling urinary catheter care and services in a manner that would prevent potential infection and maintain hygiene. The facility also failed to ensure that the urinary catheter tubing and urinary privacy bag containing the drainage bag were not touching the floor. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R82) reviewed for perineal and urinary catheter care in the sample of 25. The findings include: R82 had multiple diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of stomach, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and need for assistance with personal hygiene, based on the face sheet. R82's urine analysis result collected on 8/9/23 showed that the resident had history of Klebsiella pneumoniae ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase). R82's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 10/1/23, showed the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS showed R82 required substantial/maximum assistance from the staff with regards to toileting hygiene. The same MDS showed R82 had an indwelling urinary catheter and was frequently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order with regards to use of the oxygen humidity bottles and administration of continuous oxygen. The facility also failed to label the oxygen tubing per policy and procedure. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R31, R32 and R43) reviewed for oxygen therapy in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R43 had multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with unspecified angina pectoris, ischemic cardiomyopathy and hypoxia, based on the face sheet. On 10/24/23 at 8:29 AM, R43 was in bed alert, oriented, and verbally responsive. R43 had ongoing continuous oxygen via nasal cannula at 4.5 liters per minute using an oxygen concentrator. There was no oxygen humidity bottle being used. R43 stated the inside of his nose and mouth were dry. R43 also stated his oxygen tubing was not changed by the staff for almost a month. R43's oxygen tubing had a label dated 9/25/23. R43's order summary report showed an order, dated 9/29/3 for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to refill prescribed pain medications for a resident. This applies to 1 of 25 residents (R88) reviewed for medication availability in the sample of 25. The findings include: R88's diagnoses on face sheet included other acute osteomyelitis, other site, pneumonia, unspecified organism, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, chronic viral hepatitis C, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, unspecified. R88's quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 9/8/23, showed R88 was cognitively intact. R88's Physician Order Sheet included orders for the following pain medications: Lyrica Capsule 25 MG (Pregabalin), Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for Nerve pain (start date 5/11/23), reordered 10/20/23. Percocet Oral Tablet 10-325 MG (Oxycodone with Acetaminophen), Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for Pain (start date 5/2/23) Ibuprofen Tablet 800 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for Pain (start date 6/14/23).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and assist one resident in obtaining routine oral care annually. The facility also failed to follow up to ensure one resident was seen by visiting dentist. This applies to 2 of 25 residents (R69, R72) reviewed for dental care in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1) Review of R69's face sheet documents a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Cerebral Infraction affecting left non-Dominant side, Dysphagia following cerebral infarction, Dysarthria following cerebral infarction, and need for assistance with personal Care. R69's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 9/25/23, documents R69 requires extensive assistance for personal hygiene. On 10/23/23 at 10:32, R69 was lying in bed. R69's teeth are extremely brown, crooked, and possibly broken. R69 stated he has issues with swallowing. 10/24/23 at 12:47 PM, R69 stated he doesn't know the last time he brushed his teeth, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve thickened fluids to residents that have been identified having swallowing problems. This applies to 3 of 10 residents (R11, R69 and R72) reviewed for thickened liquids in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R11's face sheet included diagnoses of pneumonia, unspecified organism, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with (acute) exacerbation, and antiphospholipid syndrome. R11's quarterly MDS (minimum data set), dated 10/13/23, showed R11 was cognitively intact. R11's Physician Order Sheet included R11 is on General diet, Regular texture, Nectar Thick liquids consistency for cough ( order start date 9/6/23). On 10/25/23 at 9:08 AM, R11 was in her room eating her breakfast. R11 received thickened liquids with her breakfast tray. R11 was noted to have a disposable cup of clear water that was about 1/3 full. R11 stated a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain transmission based precautions for residents in isolation with infections, failed to perform hand hygiene, failed to use personal protective equipment, and failed to maintain sanitary conditions during patient care. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R77 and R82) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. According to the facility medical record, R77 was on contact isolation due to surgical wounds infected with an antibiotic-resistant bacterium (Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales - CRE) and had been since admission to the facility 6/23/23. The isolation condition was indicated by a printed sign on the door to the room and by a cart next to the door containing PPE (personal protective equipment). The sign showed disposable gloves and disposable gown should be worn by any person entering the room. On 10/23/23 at 12:42 PM, V20 (CNA - Certified Nursing Assistant) entered the room carrying the lunch tray, without first donning PPE of any kind. R77 asked V20 to fill his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-04-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide menu variety to meet resident's meal preferences. This failure could potentially affect all 144 residents who consume Food from the kitchen. The findings include: On 4/13/24 at 10:50 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated 144 residents are consuming food from the kitchen. R1 is a [AGE] year-old female, admitted on [DATE], with moderate cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. R1 was interviewed on 4/12/24 at 10:45AM, and stated, Food is horrible here, and sometimes we don't know what kind of food they are serving. We get too much pork, and I wouldn't say I like it. R3 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE], having mild cognitive impairment as per MDS dated [DATE]. R3 was interviewed on 4/12/24 at 10:20AM, and stated, Food is not good here. Every day, we get yucky eggs for breakfast. They are serving too much ham. On 4/12/24 at 11:30 AM, the kitchen was observed with kitchen staff cooking for lunch. V10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$25,830 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $16,720 — penalty dated 2026-02-13
- $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-08-28
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABA HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLONDER, MOSHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 33% | since 06/01/2019 |
| SINGER, AHARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 33% | since 06/01/2019 |
| PROGRESS, CAROLYN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 06/01/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145221. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.