Rock River Health Care
707 West Riverside Boulevard, Rockford, IL 61103 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (815) 877-5752 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $95,885 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-10)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 89.4% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.8% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.4% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 11.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.7% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.5% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 41.5% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.3% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.25 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.87 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
30.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 72% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 30.3%CMS range 21.8–45.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.5–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.10 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.69 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.89 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's discharge hospital orders were followed for medication administration, and discharge procedures and appointments. The facility failed to assess and monitor a resident with a known vision impairment, and a known facial infection on antibiotic therapy. The facility failed to monitor and assess a central venous catheter site. This failure resulted in a resident with a vitreous hemorrhage having no surgical intervention and follow up care, and the resident continuing to complain of decreased vision, facial pain, and swelling. This applies to 1 of 17 residents (R59) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 17. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 6/12/23 when R59 was re-admitted to the facility with a vitreous hemorrhage. V1 Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 9/12/23 at 3:55 PM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-12-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain accurate weights on a resident with a feeding tube (R14). The facility failed to weigh a resident (R14) as per the dietician's recommendations. The facility failed to notify the dietician of a resident's (R14) refusals of tube feedings. The facility failed to notify the dietician of missed or omitted tube feedings for R14. The facility failed to notify the dietician or nurse practitioner of R14's significant and continued weight loss in a timely manner. These failures contributed to R14 sustaining a significant weight loss. These failures apply to 1 of 7 residents (R14) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 19.The findings include:R14's current care plan showed R14 had diagnoses including end stage renal disease requiring dialysis, oral cancer, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R14 had a gastrostomy tube (G-tube) in place to receive nutritional support. The plan showed R14 was Full Code. R14 was not on hospice.Physician notes for R14…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-03-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 being kicked in the genitals and R2 being pushed to the ground and sustaining a fracture of his left femur. The findings include: R1's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility 4/23/2021 with diagnoses to include acute kidney failure, obstructive uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia, and major depressive disorder. R1's medical record showed he had an inguinal hernia repair 3/13/25 and could return to normal activity 3/17/25. R1's 2/17/25 assessment showed he has no cognitive impairment and exhibits no behaviors. On 3/22/25 at 10:12 AM, R1 was sitting in his room watching television. R1 was calm and pleasant. R1 declined to discuss the incident with the surveyor. R1's 3/20/25 Nursing Progress Note showed, Resident [R1] states [R2] kicked him, and he pushed him back and resident [R2] fell down. [R2]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-10-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform a pain assessment on R42 who was admitted for a left tibia and fibula fracture. They also failed to provide R42 with her prescribed hospital discharge pain medications, this failure resulted in R42 having to return to the hospital to be treated for uncontrolled pain for 1 of 2 residents (R42) reviewed for pain in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 10/07/24 at 9:00 AM, R42 was lying in bed with her left lower leg wrapped with an elastic dressing. On 10/07/24 at 9:01 AM, R42 said, I fell and broke my tibia and fibula close to the foot. I am currently non-weight bearing. The doctor told me he was going to wrap it for now and will eventually place me in a cast .a walking cast, I hope. I was admitted [DATE]. I did not get my medications. The facility's pharmacy is in a city two hours away. On 09/14/24, I still did not have my pain meds or regular meds by the evening. I was in so much pain I had to return to the hospital. I was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-02-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the dietitian's recommendation for free water flushes for a resident with a gastrostomy tube (g-tube) for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for g-tubes in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 becoming dehydrated, requiring hosptilization. The findings include: R1's admission record showed R1 was a [AGE] year old female that was diagnosed with esophageal obstruction. The same document showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 2/28/24 at 8:45 AM, R1 was in bed with her g-tube connected to a tube feeding. On 2/28/24 at 10:25 AM, V3 (Dietitian) said R1 is completely dependent on her g-tube for nutrition/hydration and R1 has been dehydrated. V3 said she assessed R1's hydration needs on 11/15/23 (two days after being admitted to the facility) and made the recommendation for free water flushes of 200 milliliters (ml) every 6 hours. V3 said she did not know why R1 was getting dehydrated because the free water flushes of 200…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's seizures were documented in the resident's medical records for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medical records in the sample of 8. The findings include:On 6/2/26 at 10:36 AM, R1 was sitting in his wheelchair on the patio of the facility. R1 was wearing a helmet on his head. R1 said he is epileptic and has seizures all the time. R1 said he does not recall when he has them and can not feel them coming on. On 6/2/26 at 12:20 PM, V9 Certified Nursing Assistant said R1 has seizures almost every other day. V9 said R1 had a seizure yesterday (6/1/26). V9 said when R1 has a seizure they alert the nurse. On 6/2/26 at 1:20 PM, V10 Licensed Practical Nurse said R1 has seizures almost every day. V10 said R1 has a medication they give him when he is having a seizure (Valtoco) and if that doesn't help, they have to call the paramedics. On 6/2/26 at 1:45 PM, V3 Assistant Director of Nursing said nursing should be documenting R1's seizures in the progress notes and that Valtoco is administered in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with an order for a Urology consult received an evaluation by a urologist for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for care and services in the sample of 8.The findings include:R1's Physician Order Sheet documents that R1 has diagnoses that include multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder needing indwelling urinary catheter due to urinary retention.On 2/9/26 at 8:25 AM, V14 (R1's Power of Attorney/POA) said she had a concern with R1 being hospitalized due to multiple urinary tract infections (UTIs) while R1 was at the facility. R1 had indwelling urinary catheter. R1 also has MS. R1 was supposed to see a specialist due to urinary tract infections. V14 said she did not hear any update from the facility.R1's hospital records dated 12/14/25, documents R1 was admitted to the hospital from [DATE] to 12/19/25 due to sepsis- UTI. R1 was discharged back to the facility on [DATE] with an order for R1 to be referred to a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's safety during care to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 8.The findings include:On 2/6/26 at 11:21 AM V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said on 11/21/25, she was passing morning meds when V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) came to her and said please go to R1's room. R1 was upset and angry, V4 (CNA) was about to get R1 up for breakfast. V3 LPN said she went to R1's room. R1 was holding onto the side rails, he was turned over to the left side, then fell over the side rails. V3 said she did not know why V4 was by herself to get R1 up. R1 has MS (multiple sclerosis), R1 is a mechanical lift transfer and needs 2 staff assistance for all transfers due to his MS. R1's fall incident reported dated 11/21/25 documents R1 turned over too quickly and flipped himself over the side rails. The incident report document's R1's predisposing physiological factors include: R1 is resistant to care, weakness, agitated and anxious, (has) involuntary movements and decreased strength.R1's care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a certified dietary manager was employed as food service director. This has the potential to effect all residents residing in the facility. The findings include:Centers for Medicare and Medicaid form 671 dated 12/8/25 shows there are 81 residents residing in the facility. On 12/8/25 at 9:31 AM, V13 (Food Service Director) said he is not licensed as a certified dietary manager. V13 said he took the courses at the local community college about 7 to 8 years ago and failed the exam on the first attempt. V13 has not retaken the exam since. V13 said he does initial and quarterly assessments of residents while the contract dietitian performs all assessments on high risk residents. Facility provided course certificates for V13 show that V13 completed courses in food nutrition therapy, food safety sanitation and human resource management, and management of food service operations. Per the Association of Nutrition and Foodservice Professionals, the there are no current certified dietary managers in the nation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed after touching a garbage can lid and performing other tasks. This has the potential to effect all residents that receive food from the kitchen. The findings include: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid form 671, dated 12/8/25, shows there are 81 residents residing in the facility. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid form 802, dated 12/8/25, shows there are 2 residents that receive nutrition via a tube feed. On 12/8/25 at 11:55, V14 (Dietary Aide) was by the dish machine, grabbed the lid for the garbage can, and placed it onto the garbage can. V14 did not perform hand hygiene before going to another area in the kitchen. V14 then grabbed a clean and sanitized food service pan and walked it over to the storage rack and placed it with the rest of the clean and sanitized food service pans. V14 still had not performed hand hygiene. During this time, V14 would put V14's hands in the front pocket of V14's hooded sweatshirt and remove them to perform other tasks. V14 then was approached by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the pureed pork was a smooth consistency. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R38, R41, R40, R69) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 18. The findings include:Facility provided diet report dated 12/8/25 shows R38, R41, R49, and R69 all receive a pureed diet. On 12/8/25 at 11:45 AM, V15 (Cook) grabbed a pot from the stove that had seven servings of pork slices that were cooked in chicken broth. V15 started the puree process by adding all pork slices to a blender pitcher and added additional chicken broth to help puree. At 11:48 AM, V15 added a thickening powder to the puree pork. At 11:52 AM, V15 finished the pureed pork and transferred it to a food service pan. The consistency of the finished pureed pork appeared chunky and was not smooth. On 12/8/25 at 11:28 AM, V15 said the finished consistency for purees should be similar to pudding consistency and not too thick or too runny. On 12/8/25 at 1:00 PM, a facility provided test tray of the puree meal was tested by this surveyor and V13 (Food Service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Level 2 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) interview was completed as requested for a resident admitted with known mental illness. This applies to 1 of 7 residents (R4) reviewed for PASRRs in the sample of 19. The findings include: R4's Facesheet shows R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. R4's PASRR report from 10/2/24 shows that R4 required a PASRR Level 2 evaluation to be completed. The facility was unable to show a PASRR Level 2 evaluation was completed. On 12/10/25 at 12:24 PM, V3 (Restorative Nurse) said the facility requested a Level 2 evaluation for R4 to be completed, but the evaluation was canceled when the evaluator went to R4's previous facility to conduct the evaluation. Facility provided Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Level 1 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation was resubmitted before expiration of the 60 day approval. This applies to 1 of 8 residents (R71) reviewed for PASRRs in the sample of 19. The findings include:R71's Facesheet shows R71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. R71's PASRR Level 1 screening dated 1/24/24 shows R71 was allowed a 60 day stay or less in a nursing facility. This screen also states that a re-screening must be performed by or before the 60 day period. R71's next PASRR provided by the facility was a Level 2 evaluation done on 2/26/25; beyond the 60 days. On 12/10/25 at 9:40 AM, V8 (Social Services Director) said PASRR is done on admission and after a temporary one expires. Most of the time, the hospitals have been doing the 30 or 60 day temp assessments. If someone has a new mental illness diagnosis, PASRR needs to be requested to have the PASRR 2 started with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to schedule a doctor's appointment for a resident. This failure applies to 1 of 19 residents (R7) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 19.The findings include:R7's care plan dated 6/27/25 showed R7 was visually impaired related to his diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with diabetic retinopathy. On 12/8/25 at 10:14 AM, R7 stated, My vision has really gone downhill the past six months. I saw an eye doctor here, but that doctor said I needed to see a specialist for cataracts or glaucoma. No one has made an appointment for me. A facility optometrist report dated 11/24/25 showed R7 was seen and examined in the facility by an in-house optometrist. The report showed R7 was diagnosed with bilateral cataracts with a note that showed facility staff were to make an appointment for R7 to see a glaucoma specialist. R7's physician order report printed 12/9/25 showed no scheduled appointment for R7 to see an optometrist specializing in the treatment of glaucoma. R7's progress notes dated 11/24/25-12/8/25 were reviewed and showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure low air loss mattress settings were programmed to effectively off-load areas of pressure for residents with pressure injuries for 3 of 8 residents (R14, R11, R3) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 19. The findings include:1.R14's Wound Evaluation report dated 12/3/25 showed R14 had a Stage 4 pressure injury to his coccyx. R14's revised care plan dated 8/4/25 showed a pressure reducing (low air loss) mattress was listed as one of R14's pressure relieving interventions for R14's coccyx pressure injury. The plan showed no documentation that R14 requested to have his pressure reducing mattress programmed for a specific setting. R14's weight record dated 12/8/25 showed R14 weighed 101 pounds (lbs). On 12/8/25 at 9:40 AM, R14 was in bed lying on a low air loss mattress. R14's mattress was programmed for a resident weighing 350 lbs. On 12/9/25 at 8:03 AM, R14 is in bed. R14's low air loss mattress remained programmed for a resident weighing 350 lbs.2.R11's Wound Evaluation report dated 12/3/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician. There were 30 opportunities with 12 medication errors resulting in a 40% medication error rate. These failures apply to 2 of 3 residents (R23, R47) observed in the medication pass. The findings include:On 12/8/25 at 10:13 AM, V9 Registered Nurse prepared R47's morning medications. V9 dispensed a tablet of chewable aspirin 81mg in R47's medication cup. V9 administered the aspirin to R47.R47's Physician Orders dated 11/26/25 shows and order Aspirin Enteric Coated Tablet Delayed Release 81 mg. Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for heart health.On 12/09/2025 at 8:13 AM, V10 Licensed Practical Nurse prepared R23's morning medication including 11 oral tablets. R23 was in her room, in chair, with her breakfast on the overbed table. At 8:23 AM, V10 set R23's medication cup with 11 medications on R23's breakfast tray. At 8:30 AM, V10 administered R23's insulin (R23's medications remained on the breakfast tray). V10 left the room, signed off R23's medications in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents medications were securely stored and inaccessible to residents for 2 of 19 residents (R43, R59) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1.R43's physician order report printed 12/9/25 showed R43 was prescribed Novolog insulin and Ozempic related to his diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The report showed no physician order to allow R43 to keep medications in his room or to allow R43 to self-administer his medications. On 12/8/25 at 10:11 AM, R43 was seated in his bed. On R43's bedside table was a Novolog insulin pen and a pen of Ozempic medication. Both pens had been opened and used, with medication missing from each pen. R43 stated he kept the medications by his bedside because sometimes my meds are given late here so I give them to myself. On 12/9/25 at 8:08 AM, R43's Novolog insulin and Ozempic pens remained on R43's bedside table. On 12/0/25 at 8:09 AM, V2 Director of Nursing stated residents cannot have any medications in their room and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident and their personal property was treated with respect. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 3.The findings include:R1's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including COPD, asthma, tobacco use, anxiety, hypertension and schizoaffective disorder.On 8/19/25 at 8:53 AM, R1 was in his room wearing oxygen, a laptop and other personal items were on his bedside table. R1's bedside table located next to his bed including his cigarettes, personal hygiene products and personal mail. R1 said on 8/13/25, he went out to the hospital for shortness of breath. When he came back from the hospital, R2 (R1's roommate) told him female staff went through his belongings and took $40.00 and two jars of hemp. R1 showed this surveyor the text to V1 (Administrator) Your people went through my belongings. I'm calling the police. I'm missing $40.00. R1 said he felt violated and disrespected, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a comfortable temperature by not keep a resident's room below 81 degrees Fahrenheit for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for comfortable homelike environment in the sample of 3.The Findings include:R1's Face Sheet printed on 7/28/25 indicated R1 had the diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.A facility assessment done on 7/24/25 showed R1's mental status was intact. On 7/28/25 at 8:43 AM, R1 said the temperature in his room was too hot and had been uncomfortable for the last few days. R1 had a built-in wall air conditioner in his room. There was no portable air conditioner in R1's room. On 7/28/25 at 8:43 AM, the surveyor used a thermometer that had been calibrated in an ice bath to check R1's room temperature. R1's room temperature was 81.7 degrees Fahrenheit. The air coming out of the wall air conditioner's vent was 81.6 degrees Fahrenheit.On 7/28/25 at 10:26 AM, R1's room temperature was 81.5 degrees Fahrenheit. The air coming out of the wall air conditioner's vent was 81.3 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from significant medication error. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medications in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including post traumatic seizures, COPD, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and personal history of traumatic brain injury.On 7/21/25 at 8:42 AM, R1 was in his room lying in bed, V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) was in his room taking his vitals. At 8:43 AM, the emergency services arrived and entered R1's room. At 8:46 AM, R1 left the building with emergency services.On 7/21/25 at 8:46 AM, V6 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) said R1 is alert and oriented x3, he was fine this morning when he got up and ate breakfast. After breakfast he wanted to lay down and usually, he refuses to lay down and stays up in his wheelchair till after dinner. He transferred R1 back in bed and R1's body started jerking in bed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify a new skin alteration for a resident who is at risk for developing pressure wounds which applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pressure wounds in a sample of 3. The findings include: R1 facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 is a [AGE] year-old cognitive male resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include a history of traumatic brain injury, bilateral lower leg amputation, lack of coordination, and unspecified dementia. This assessment showed R1 is dependent or needs maximum assistance with activities of daily living which include transferring, bed mobility, showering/bathing, and getting dressed. On 7/1/25 at 10:30 AM, V2 Director of Nursing performed a skin check on R1. During the skin check, two open areas were identified. One on the right and left lower buttocks. The right open area was measured at 1.2 x 0.5 x 0.1 centimeters (cm). The left buttock open area was measured at 0.75 x 2.0 x…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain resident's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines or supplies which applies to 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5) reviewed for respiratory treatments in a sample of 5. The findings include: On 6/4/25 the facility provided a list of residents using CPAP machines in the facility which included R1-R5. 1. R1's Facesheet printed on 6/4/25 showed R1 is a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: acute respiratory failure and obstructive sleep apnea. On 6/4/25 at 9:30 AM, R1 was in his room watching television. R1's CPAP machine was sitting on the nightstand next to the bed. R1 stated he has used the same mask, water tank, and tubing (heated coil tubing) for the machine for over a year. R1 stated prior to coming here he would get supplies delivered every 3-6 months depending on what the item was. R1 stated he had lung issues and did not want to get sick. R1 stated he used a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medication administration records (MAR) for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. R1's MAR printed on 3/5/25 had blank spots for 2/8/25 and 2/9/25 for the following medications: aspirin, budesonide-formoterol fumarate inhaler, cholestyramine, colchicine, flecainide acetate, folic acid, glipizide, furosemide, pregabalin, metoprolol, pantoprazole sodium, apixaban, and hyoscyamine sulfate. On 3/5/25 at 1:10 PM, R1 said to the best of her recollection she did receive her medications on 2/8/25 and 2/9/25. A facility assessment done on 3/4/25 showed R1's mental status was intact. 2. R2's MAR printed on 3/5/25 had blank spots for 2/8/25 and 2/9/25 for the following medications: aripiprazole, atorvastatin, cholecalciferol, clonazepam, donepezil hydrochloride, fenofibrate, fluoxetine, furosemide, Humalog insulin, Lantus insulin, miconazole, polyethylene glycol, montelukast sodium, multivitamin, mirabegron, nystatin powder, olanzapine,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed enhanced barrier precautions by not wearing the required personal protective equipment (PPE) when emptying an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's Order Summary Report printed on 3/5/25 showed R1 was on enhanced barrier precautions because of an indwelling urinary catheter. R1's Care Plan with an initiated date of 6/27/24 showed R1 was at high risk for infection because of a catheter. Listed under interventions was, PPE to be worn during high contact activities: gown, and gloves and shield when risk of splash is present (i.e. emptying a catheter, working with feeding tube, etc.). R1's name appeared on the December 2024 infection control log. The log indicated R1 received an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection. On 3/5/25 at 8:12 AM, on the door of R1's room was a sign indicating R1 was on enhanced barrier precautions. R1 had an indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag hanging on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have an RN (Registered Nurse) for 8 hours per day 7 days a week. This applies to all 74 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The CMS-671 long-term care facility application for Medicare and Medicaid dated October 7, 2024, shows, there are 74 residents residing in the facility. The facility's daily assignment sheet dated April 28, 2024, shows, there was only an RN in the building from 7:00 AM-11:00AM (4 hours and not 8 hours). The facility's daily assignment sheets dated June 2, 2024, and October 6, 2024, shows, there were no RNs working. On October 9, 2024, at 1:30 PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there were no RNs working 8 hours per day on April 28, June 2 and October 6, 2024. She stated, there should be an RN that works every day for at least 8 hours per day. The facility's Registered Nurse Staffing policy dated January 2024 shows, Policy: The facility shall ensure that a Registered Nurse is available for supervision in the facility . Procedure: 1. The facility must use the services of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow the recipe and menu for the noon meal. This applies to all 74 residents in the facility. The findings include: The facility's week 1 food menu for the noon meal on October 7, 2024, shows, cheesy chicken baked penne, Italian blend vegetables, mandarin oranges, coffee/tea and condiments. On October 7, 2024, at 10:23 AM, V13 (Cook) was preparing lunch for the residents on puree diets. She had chicken, noodles and broth in a pan on the stovetop. She stated, that was what the puree diet was getting for lunch and proceeded to puree that for them. She also pureed carrots for them. On October 7, 2024, at 11:41 AM, V13 (Cook) was starting to plate the noon meal for all residents. There was a pan of penne pasta in a red sauce and Italian blend vegetables on the steam table. All of the residents on a regular diet were served that. She stated, the pasta had chicken, onion and some cheese in it. She stated, she did the regular diets fresh that was why the pureed diets didn't get the same thing. She just simmered the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were double locked. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R11, R14, R34, & R62) reviewed for controlled substances in the sample of 20. The findings include: On October 7, 2024, at 10:09 AM, the medication refrigerator in the second floor medication room was opened with the lock sitting on top of the refrigerator. R11, R14, R34 & R62's liquid lorazepam (anti-anxiety/Scheduled IV controlled substance) was in the door of the medication refrigerator. V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated, the refrigerator should have been locked. R11, R14, R34 & R62's order entries show, an order for lorazepam oral concentrate 2 mg (milligrams)/ml (milliliter). The facility's medication storage in the facility dated February 2024 shows, Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safety, securely, and properly following the manufacture or supplier recommendations. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide the residents with an appetizing and appealing meal for 8 of 8 (R16, R32, R35, R45, R56, R66, R69, & R72) residents reviewed for appearance, palatability and preferred temperature in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 10/07/24 at 9:41 AM, R56 said, what is cold is warm, what is hot is cold. The food they make is hard to identify. They do not inform you about the food. There are no alternatives. On 10/07/24 at 11:59 AM, R32 said, there is no menu. There is no alternative menu. I'm allergic to pork, in that case they will provide PB&J (peanut butter and jelly). But I have my own food I make. Having a substitution menu sounds like a good Idea, I don't think it will happen here. On 10/07/24 at 12:16 PM, R16 lying in bed on back with head of bed low. R16's roommate was eating lunch. We are not provided a menu for meals. I cannot request substitutions. I have requested mashed potatoes for lunch multiple times, they cannot even bring me that. I don't like meat; I like vegetables. The vegetables are usually so poorly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide residents with available drinks when requested by the resident for 6 of 11 residents (R2, R12, R17, R24, R31, and R27) reviewed for drinks available to meet needs/hydration in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 10/08/24 at 12:30 PM, R2, R12, R17, R24, R31, and R27 requested milk during their noon meal. The facility did not provide them with milk. On 10/08/24 at 12:45 PM, V5 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) said, the staff called down for milk and was told by the kitchen that only 5 milks can come up to the floor. They (kitchen staff) told us milk is not for lunch. Milk was handed out to 5 residents, but 6 residents were not given milk. The kitchen tells us it's not for lunch, only dinner. On 10/08/24 at 2:19 PM, V4 (Dietary Manager) said, I give one milk at dinner, a lot of residents want milk. We have plenty of milk, 18 cases of milk. If they want milk they can have it. I don't know why they said that about not sending it to them. On 10/08/2024 V5 (LPN) provided a list showing, R2, R12, R17, R24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to dress a resident in a dignified manner. This applies to 1 of 20 (R2) residents reviewed for dignity in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 10/7/2024 at 10:20 AM, R2 was observed sitting up in his wheelchair near the nursing station with pink and green colored pants on with a plaid or checker pattern on them. On the left inner thigh area there was approximately a 4-5-inch rip in the pants with another rip on the right inner thigh area of about 2 inches. On 10/7/2024 at 10:20 AM, R2 said he was embarrassed about his pants. On 10/7/2024 at 11:35 AM, V7 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said [R2] was given a shower that morning and was put in those pants by facility staff before she came in. V7 said you wouldn't dress your mother or grandmother in ripped clothes. V7 said she wouldn't dress a resident in clothes that are ripped or [NAME]. V7 said [R2] is unable to dress himself, he needs assistance with that. R2's current Care Plan states…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, clutter free shower, and maintain a resident's room in need of repairs. This applies to 2 of 20 (R48, R39) residents reviewed for clean comfortable homelike environment in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. On 10/7/2024 at 9:34 AM, R48 said the shower room on the second floor is dirty and cluttered. On 10/7/2024 at 10:02 AM, the second-floor shower room had a towel on the floor, a pink basin on the floor with a towel in it, a razor face down in the corner of the room, a rolled up blue gown on the floor, cracked or peeling caulk along the edges of the shower room, and no drain cover on the drain for the shower on the right. On 10/8/2024 at 11:24 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility's shower room should be a homelike environment, organized, clutter free, clean, no towels on floor, no old clothing, and no soap scum should be in there. 2. On 10/7/24 at 9:23 AM, R39 was lying in her bed. Her room appeared to be dirty and in need of repairs. The baseboard along the bottom wall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide wound care for R56's stage 4 pressure ulcer on the weekend shift for 1 of 5 residents (R56) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 10/07/24 at 9:30AM, R56 was lying in bed on his left back side. On 10/07/24 at 9:30 AM, R56 said, I have a wound to my left upper buttocks. The wound nurse comes 5 days a week. If the wound nurse is not here, the dressing is not done. If it falls off over the weekend, the nurse will not change it. On 10/09/24 at 11:21 AM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said, wound care is documented in the MAR (Medication Administration Record). The floor nurse performs the dressing change on the weekend. Monday through Friday the wound nurse performs the dressing change. The empty box on the MAR denotes the dressing change was not performed. R56's MAR dated September 2024 shows, Wound Care: Left buttock: wound cleanser, skin prep to peri-wound, silver sulfadiazine, cover with gauze island once daily and as needed if becomes soiled or dislodged. every night…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to supervise residents to prevent a resident from giving food to another resident on a specialized diet for 1 of 20 residents (R38) reviewed for safety supervision in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 10/7/24 at 9:16 AM, R38 was sitting in the dining area falling asleep and slowly feeding herself a breakfast tray that had pureed food on it. At 9:32 AM, R38 was in the same spot in the dining area, she had a package of [Name Brand] snack cakes with doughnut like consistency and was opening the package and began to eat them. V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was sitting at the nurse's station directly across from where R38 was eating the snack cakes and did not question R38 about them or seem concerned she was eating them. R38 told the surveyor another male resident gave them to her. R38's Physician Order Summary shows an order dated 10/4/24 for her to have a pureed diet. A Nursing Progress note on 9/27/24 at 1:34 PM shows that R38 was having trouble swallowing possibly due to phlegm in her throat and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor a resident (R20) while taking their medications and failed to provide and/or document provision of medication to a resident (R33) on the MAR (Medication Reconciliation Record). This applies to 2 of 5 (R20, R33) reviewed for mediations in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. On 10/8/2024 at 8:09 AM, V5 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed passing morning medications to R20. V5 put 400 milligrams (mg) of Magnesium Oxide x1, 25 mg Atenolol x1 tab, and a multivitamin tab in a medication cup for R20. V5 brought R20 his medications in a cup, left them in front of the resident on his meal tray, and left without watching him take the medication. V5 then returned to R20's room with an 81 mg Aspirin tab and put that in his medication cup with the first three pills. R20 had not taken the first 3 medications. V5 walked back out of the room and did not monitor R20 taking his medications. On 10/8/2024 at 8:09 AM, V5 said she leaves his medications with him because he won't take them if you are standing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report and keep a resident's room free of bugs/pest. This applies to 1 of 20 residents (R43) reviewed for pest control in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 10/7/2024 at 12:20PM, R43 observed telling V9 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) she had wasps in her room. On 10/7/2024 at 12:22PM, approximately 5 black and red bugs were observed on the interior portion of R43's room window. On 10/8/2024 at 12:03PM, approximately 3 black and red bugs were observed on the interior portion of R43's room window. On 10/9/2024 at 11:19PM, one black and red bug was observed on the interior portion of R43's room window. On 10/8/2024 at 12:07PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) said resident's rooms should not have bugs in them. On 10/8/2024 at 2:52PM, V6 Maintenance said he was not made aware of any issues with [R43's] room regarding bugs. V6 said an outside pest control company was on site this morning (10/8/2024) but was not here for R43's room. The facility's Pest Control Policy reviewed 11/2022, states . employees are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received their scheduled/routine pain medication and failed to document that medications were given on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. R3's face sheet showed R3 had the diagnosis of pain. On 6/4/24 at 10:30 AM, R3 said he missed one dose of his scheduled pain medication of hydrocodone-acetaminophen. R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed on 5/29/24 that his scheduled bedtime pain medication was not given because it was not available. The facility's Patient Centered (PCC) Pass Times policy showed bedtime medications were to be given between 8:00 PM-11:59 PM. On 5/30/24 at 12:56 PM, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse-LPN) said she took care of R3 on 5/29/24 from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM on 5/30/24. V6 said she did not give R3 his scheduled bedtime pain medication on 5/29/24 because she was waiting for the pharmacy to deliver the medication. V6 said she waited for the 1:00 AM pharmacy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were reconciled for 4 of 4 residents (R2, R3, R4 and R5) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 17. The findings include: On 5/21/24 at 9:40 AM, inside the medication room on the second floor sitting in a box were 20, 2nd floor residents' individual packages of various medications. The dates on these medications were for 5/12/24 at time to be given listed as BED. V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was inside the medication room with the surveyor and said those medications should have been given on 5/12/24 at bedtime. V6 said she has found medications still inside the cart when she comes on duty the next morning that should have been given the evening prior. An individual packet of medication for R2 was one of the 20 resident medications still inside the medication which was Levetiracetam (seizure prevention medication). R2's Medication Administration Record shows the following medications were not signed off as given on 5/12/24 Depakote 500 Milligrams (MG.) to be given in EVE, Flomax…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide catheter care in a manner to prevent cross contamination. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for catheter care in the sample of 6. The findings include: R3's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an original admission date of 10/28/16 with diagnoses to include enlarged prostate, dementia, and schizoaffective disorder. R3's 2/13/24 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed he had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS showed he had catheter. On 3/6/24 at 9:49 AM, V6 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) began catheter care for R3. V6 gathered his supplies, removed R3's incontinence brief, and soaked a wet washcloth in soapy water. V6 wiped R3's penis, starting at the base and going towards the tip, with a wet washcloth. V6 repeated this process several times. V6 also washed R3's buttocks and applied ointment to R3's perineal area. V6 then laid R3's urine collection bag on the floor. V6 then put a folded blanket on the floor, picked up the collection bag off the floor, and placed it on the folded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions and fall assessments were updated after a resident experienced a fall for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of three. The findings include: R1's face sheet printed on 9/19/23 showed diagnoses including but not limited to cerebral palsy, Barrett's Esophagus, cardiomyopathy, depression, anxiety, obesity, and quadriplegia. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed moderate cognitive impairment and requires extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The same assessment showed R1 requires total assistance with transfers. R1's progress note dated 9/13/23 at 3:50 AM, showed: Resident observed on floor next to bed positioned on his back. Resident alert and verbally responsive. Resident states that he woke up and was on the floor. The note showed R1 did not have any outward signs of injury and vitals were within normal limits, but he was complaining of neck…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions were implemented and failed to develop an Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy and Procedures. The facility's Resident Census and Conditions Report (CMS) dated 9/11/23 show there were 67 residents residing at the facility. This report also shows that there are 2 residents with indwelling catheters and 5 residents with pressure ulcers. None of these residents were placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. R59, a resident in this facility with a central intravenous catheter was not placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions. On 9/11/23 at 12:33 PM, V3 (Infection Control) said the facility has not implemented Enhanced Barrier Precautions. V3 said she does not know anything about this and no one has told me about that. On 9/11/23 at 2 PM V4 (Nurse Consultant) said Enhanced Barrier Precautions are additional precautions for residents aside from the normal precautions already in place. V4 said the facility Enhanced Barrier Precautions program including the Policies and Procedures will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to investigate an alleged allegation of financial abuse for 1 of 17 residents (R50) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 17. The findings include: A progress note dated 7/8/2023 timed at 11:00 AM shows, resident visitor/niece called the facility requesting to speak with resident (R50), when informed that resident was eating at this time, visitor/niece stated she would call resident back later. When this writer informed (R50) that his visitor will be back, R50 stated that he did not want to see her at this time. He stated that he had already gave her 50.00 late last night and 100.00 on Thursday and was not gonna give her any more money. This writer then informed Administrator of the situation. This writer also attempted to call resident 2nd and 3rd emergency contacts to inform them of this lady stating she's related to resident and taking him across the street to the a ATM to withdraw money. On 09/12/23 at 9:43 AM R50 was sitting in his wheelchair by his room. R50 said someone had asked him for money in the past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure prescribed treatment orders were in place for residents with pressure ulcers and failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were in place. This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R17, R45) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 17. The findings include: 1. R17's Physician Order Sheets show he is a [AGE] year old male with diagnosis including stage 4 pressure ulcer of left buttock, paraplegia, end stage renal disease, dependence of renal dialysis, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. R17's Wound Physician Progress note dated 9/5/23 documents he has a stage 4 pressure wound of the left ischium measuring 0.4 cm (centimeters) x 0.3 cm x 1.0 cm. Wound progress: not improved. Treatment orders include to cleanse with wound cleanser, xeroform gauze, antibiotic ointment and bordered foam dressing. On 09/10/23 at 1:39 PM, R17 was observed lying in bed. V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant) assisted R17 to his side. An open area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall interventions for a resident with a history of falls (R16) and failed to ensure safety smoking precautions were in place for a resident (R38). These failures apply to two of seventeen residents reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of seventeen. Findings include: 1. On 9/12/23 at 10:45 AM, R16 was in his wheelchair on the unit and propelled himself into his room and made several attempts to propel himself toward the bathroom entry way. R16 was removed from his room via wheelchair by the assist of V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant) CNA and taken out to the unit. R16's Face sheet printed on 9/11/23 showed diagnoses to include but not limited to epilepsy, dysphagia, dementia, hypertension, hemiplegia, intellectual disabilities, and cognitive communication deficit. R16's Care plan showed R16 is at risk for falls related to impaired mobility, balance, and decrease safety awareness. R16's Minimum data set (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided to residents with significant weight loss and failed to ensure a nutritional assessment was performed for a resident who was re-admitted to the facility with multiple wounds and history of significant weight loss. This applies to 2 of 17 residents (R46, R62) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 17. The findings include: 1. R46's Physician Order Sheets (P.O.S.) shows he is a [AGE] year old male with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, schizophrenia, anxiety and hypertension. The P.O.S. shows orders for ice cream in the afternoon and evening. R46's Dietary Progress note dated 9/9/23 documents R46's current weight is 140 lb (pounds) he triggered for significant weight loss at three months at 8.1 % (12.4 pound weight loss) and six months at 16.4% (16.4 pound weight loss). Regular diet with milk at all meals and ice cream twice a day and med pass (nutritional shake) three times a day. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure insulin pens were labeled and dated when opened. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R40, R44) reviewed for medication labeling in the sample of 17. The findings include: 1. On 9/10/23 at 4:47 PM, V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered R40's insulin. R40's Apidra pen (rapid acting insulin) was not dated or labeled. V6 confirmed R40's insulin pen was not labeled and dated and said Insulin pens should be dated when opened and are good for 29 days. R40's Physician Orders dated September 2023 shows orders for Apidra Subcutaneous solution Pen-Injector inject per sliding scale. 2. On 9/10/23 at 4:55 PM, the first floor medication cart was checked. R44's Lantus pen (long acting insulin) was not labeled or dated. R44's Physician Order Sheets dated thru September 2023 shows order for Lantus inject 8 units subcutaneously in the morning. On 09/13/23 at 8:34 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said Insulin pens are usually good for 28 dates after opening and should be dated. The facility's undated Medication Storage In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer pneumococcal vaccination series per CDC guidelines for 2 of 5 residents (R14, R38) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 17 The findings include: R14's ([AGE] years old (y/o)) immunization record showed R14 had received pneumovax dose 1 on 11/2/21 but did not specify what kind of pneumonia vaccination R14 received. R38's (72 y/o) immunization record showed R38 had received pneumonia dose 1 on 11/3/2021 but did not specify what kind of pneumonia vaccination R38 received. On 9/12/23 at 9:30 AM-V3 (Infection Control Nurse) handed this surveyor a handwritten note that dose 1 was prevnar 23 (PPSV23). V3 said there was no follow thru or additional series of pneumonia vaccine that has been offered to these residents. V3 said Pneumonia vaccination is important since long term care residents are in a communal living. Pneumonia shot will protect them against lung infections. The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$95,885 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $23,625 — penalty dated 2025-12-10
- $17,540 — penalty dated 2024-10-09
- $12,841 — penalty dated 2024-02-28
- $41,879 — penalty dated 2023-09-13
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-10 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to SABA HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMF HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 15% | since 08/20/2014 |
| BLONDER, MOSHE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 13% | since 08/20/2014 |
| LEVOVITZ, YERUCHOM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 14% | since 08/20/2014 |
| SINGER, AHARON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 13% | since 08/20/2014 |
| WEBSTER, SHIMON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 18% | since 08/20/2014 |
| MB FINANCIAL BANK NA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 08/01/2018 |
| ROCK RIVER HEALTH CARE REALTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 10/01/2014 |
| ARREGUIN, ROLAND | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/09/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145818. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.