Arista Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 25.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 153 beds and averages 85.6 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 67 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.94 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide grooming/hygiene to residents who require assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) care.This applies to 4 of 7 residents (R3, R39, R52, R89) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 23. The findings include:1. On April 13, 2026, at 11:52 AM, R39 was sitting in his wheelchair in the dining room. R39's fingernails on both hands were long with jagged edges, with brown- black substances under the fingernails. On April 14, 2026, at 12:42 PM, R39 was eating in the dining room. R39 was attempting to open a carton of milk, using his hands and a fork. R39 touched the inside of the milk container with his hands while attempting to open it and drank some of the milk. According to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), R39 had multiple diagnoses, including unspecified dementia, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness (generalized), and other specified arthritis, multiple sites. R39's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], showed R39…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor the nutritional intake of a resident who received a rapid acting insulin. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R18) reviewed for insulin administration in the sample of 23. The findings include:R18's EMR (Electronic Medical Records) showed R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including type II diabetes, phantom limb syndrome with pain, absence of left and right legs above the knees, peripheral vascular disease, obesity, hypothyroidism, and anxiety disorder. R18's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated March 3, 2026, showed R18 was cognitively intact and needed setup/clean-up assistance with eating and oral hygiene. On April 14, 2026, at 9:52 AM, there was a noise heard coming from R18's room. Once inside R18's room, R18 was in bed with her over the bed tray table in front of her. R18's breakfast tray was sitting on the over the bedside tray table. R18's body was shaking and coming into contact with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow orders and therapy recommendations to apply upper extremity devices for residents that have functional limitations on one side.This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R90) reviewed for range of motions in the sample of 23. The findings include:1.R90's face sheet included multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, wrist drop, right wrist, paraplegia, other lack of coordination. R90's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated April 2, 2026, showed that R90 was cognitively intact and had functional limitation in range of motion due to impairment on one side. R90's POS (Physician Order Summary) showed to apply RWHFO (Right Wrist-Hand-Finger-Orthosis) before breakfast and remove after lunch 4-6 hours/daily as tolerated. Check for skin breakdown and maintain brace hygiene (revised October 6, 2025). On April 13, 2026, at 11:16 AM, R90 was sitting propped up in bed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide peri-care in a manner that would prevent urinary tract infection (UTI), failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter is secured, and failed to apply barrier cream after an incontinence care. This applies to 3 of the 4 residents (R13, R78, R90) reviewed for incontinence and catheter care in the sample of 23. The findings include:1. The electronic medical record (EMR) showed R90 is [AGE] years old who has multiple medical diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, cholecystitis, stage 3 chronic kidney disease. On April 13, 2026, at 5:11 PM, V33 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) rendered incontinence care to R90 who was saturated with urine. V33 used wet towels to wipe R90's groins and outer labia. However, V33 did not open and clean the inner area of the labial folds and the urethra, and proceeded to clean the back perineum. V33 finished the incontinence care without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene in between tasks during provisions of care and failed to wear complete PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) when providing care to a resident who is under EBP (Enhance Barrier Precautions). This applies to 3 of 23 residents (R3, R7, R90) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 23. The findings include: 1. R90 has multiple diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and presence of gastrostomy tube. On April 13, 2026, at 4:44 PM, V5 (Nurse) checked the gastrostomy tube (g-tube) placement of R90 and administered R90's medications via g-tube. After administration, V5 removed her gloves, touch other surfaces, and donned new set of gloves without hand hygiene then she proceeded to check R90's blood glucose level. 2. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R3 has multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer and end stage renal failure (ESRD). R3 receives dialysis from Monday through Friday and has a dialysis access port in the right upper chest. R3's Care Plan shows…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene, and did not use PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) while providing care for residents in EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) and failed to educate visitors regarding contact TBP (Transmission Based Precautions). This applies to 7 of 7 residents (R2, R3, R4, R7, R8, R9, R10) reviewed for infection control practices in the sample of 10. The findings include: 1. R2's medical record showed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnosis including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, gastrostomy status, diabetes mellitus with chronic kidney disease, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and major depressive disorder, recurrent. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated February 9, 2025, showed R2 was cognitively intact and required assistance with ADLs including moderate assistance with oral hygiene, personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label/date/store food items and scoops, remove expired items, clean walk-in cooler, and wear hair restraint while serving food from facility kitchen. This applies to all residents that receive oral nutrition and foods prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (Form CMS-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-671) dated 1/14/25 documents the total census was 79 residents. On 1/15/25 at 11:29 AM, V1 (Administrator) said there are 3 NPO (Nothing By Mouth) residents; all other residents eat from the facility kitchen. On 1/14/25 starting at 10:16 AM, the facility kitchen was toured in the presence of V16 (Dietary Manager) and the following was found: In walk-in cooler: 1. A large empty silver bin on top shelf under the fan with crusted dirt and dust in it and a dead dusty black house fly. V16 said the bin is kept on the top shelf to catch water dripping off the fan. Surveyor did not observe any water dripping from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care with dignity to 3 of 3 residents (R12, R56, R22) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On 01/14/25 at 12:47 PM V6 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) was observed during lunch standing over R22 while assisting with feeding R22. On 1/16/2025 at 12:50 PM V2 (DON) said V6 should not be standing over R22 while feeding her for dignity and respect. 2. On 01/14/25 at 11:35 AM, V7 and V8 CNAs (Certified Nurses Assistants) were providing incontinence care and giving a bed bath to R12 and R12's curtain was left open. R12's entire body was exposed. R13 (R12's roommate) was in the room at the time. On 01/16/25 at 01:30 PM R12 said he wants his door and his curtain closed when staff are providing care for him for privacy. R12 said that he usually has to tell staff to close his door and curtain when they are providing care for him. R12 said that it makes him feel uncomfortable when they leave them open. R12 said that the staff always leave the door open, and it makes him cold. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of reason for transfer to resident and/or their representative before resident transferred to hospital and failed to send a copy of transfer notice to the Ombudsman. This applies to 3 residents (R62, R69, and R37) reviewed for hospital transfers in a sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R62's Face sheet shows an admission date of 11/5/24. R62's nursing progress note dated 1/8/25 at 15:33 shows R62 was transferred and admitted to hospital with diagnosis of pneumonia and acute cystitis. There is no documentation of written notice of transfer being provided to resident or their representative, or the Ombudsman. 2. R69's Face sheet shows an admission date of 8/4/23. R69's nursing progress note dated 1/14/25 at 11:34 AM shows R69 was transferred to hospital for gastrostomy and jejunostomy tube evaluation. There is no documentation of written notice of transfer being provided to resident or their representative, or the Ombudsman. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed hold policy to resident and/or their representative prior to resident transfer to hospital. This applies to 3 residents (R62, R69, and R37) reviewed for hospital transfers in a sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R62's Face sheet shows an admission date of 11/5/24. R62's nursing progress note dated 1/8/25 at 15:33 shows R62 was transferred and admitted to hospital with diagnosis of pneumonia and acute cystitis. There is no documentation of bed hold policy being provided to resident prior to transfer to hospital. 2. R69's Face sheet shows an admission date of 8/4/23. R69's nursing progress note dated 1/14/25 at 11:34 AM shows R69 was transferred to hospital for gastrostomy and jejunostomy tube evaluation. There is no documentation of bed hold policy being provided to resident prior to transfer to hospital. On 1/15/25 at 3:50 PM, V1 (Administrator) said the facility does not have any documentation of bed hold notices being provided…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SABA HEALTHCARE — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL