St Patrick's Residence

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 228 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 137 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 209 beds and averages 166.0 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough and impartial investigation of resident abuse by a staff member. The facility also failed to maintain documentation from the witnesses of the abuse. R1 experienced pain and was crying following the incident. The alleged perpetrator was allowed to return to work another two shifts with R1. A reasonable person would experience fear and anxiety having the alleged perpetrator provide care for a dependent resident with a history suffering from abuse. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 3.The findings include: The facility failed to conduct a thorough and impartial abuse investigation. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at 5:40 PM when CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) students reported to V9 (Wound Nurse/Nurse Supervisor) that they witnessed V8 (CNA) abuse R1. V9 then conducted witness interviews in a coercive manner, failed to substantiate the abuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not fall out of bed after being turned during incontinence care. This failure resulted in the resident slipping off the bed and experiencing bilateral distal femur fractures requiring bilateral femoral retrograde rodding. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of 3. Findings Include:Review of R1's care plan shows R1's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting her left side, osteoarthritis, and dementia with impaired thought processes. R1 was at increased risk for falls related to her weakness, hemiplegia, poor balance/coordination, and medications. R1 utilized a pressure-relieving mattress on her bed, had altered functional range of motion of her left side, required a mechanical lift and two staff for transfers, used 1/4 side rails to enable bed mobility, and prior to her fall required the maximal assistance of one staff but may need two staff at times for bed mobility. MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 4/14/26, shows R1's cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-04-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from physical and mental abuse from staff. These failures caused R1 to sob and experience pain following the episode of witnessed abuse. This applies to 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 3. A reasonable person would experience fear and anxiety of the alleged perpetrator to provide care for a dependent resident with a history of suffering from abuse and has experienced significant trauma during their lifetime as stated in the care plan. The findings include: R1's Face sheet dated 4/10/26, shows R1's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, dementia with psychotic disturbance, adult failure to thrive, major depression disorder, pain in left and right knee and low back pain, cervicalgia, muscle weakness, noncompliance with other medical treatment, psychosis not due to a substance, anxiety, hemiplegia, and legal blindness. The face sheet shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired at the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the local law enforcement agency regarding allegations of resident abuse per the facility policy. This applies to 2 (R1 and R2) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse allegations in the sample of 3.The findings include: 1.Initial abuse report dated March 25, 2026, and final report dated March 27, 2026, shows an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the facility regarding R1. On 4/6/26 at 3:09 PM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA Student) stated she and V5 (CNA Student) witnessed V8 (CNA) pushing R1 on her left side while lying in bed and using a lot of unnecessary force - it looked like she was hurting her. V14 stated R1 was telling V8 to stop, and she was being hurt and V8 was pressing very hard on R1's shoulder while leaning over her and putting her weight into R1. V14 stated she and V7 (CNA Student) were then sent into R1's room to feed R1. V14 stated R1 began sobbing and stated V8 hurt her. V14 stated R1 attempted to show V14 and V7 her knee where it hurt and R1 grabbed V14's shoulder and told V14 and V7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0847 — widespread
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility's Arbitration Agreement failed to have the required language in the Arbitration Agreement Contract. This applies to all 170 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated January 13, 2025, by V1 (Administrator) showed the facility census was 170 residents. The facility provided their Facility's admission Contract Between Resident and [Facility] (Short-Term Rehabilitation Care and Long-Term Care Services) contract. On pages 17-18, the contract explained the arbitration agreement, but failed to let the resident and /or the resident representative know that signing this contract was not a condition of their admission to this facility or that after signing the agreement, that they had 30 days to rescind the agreement. On January 13, 2025 at 9:32 AM, during entrance conference, V1 (Administrator) said the arbitration agreement is part of the admission packet. V1 said she has not had any newly admitted resident or their representative refuse to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0848 — widespread
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review the facility's Arbitration Agreement failed to have a process for selecting a neutral arbitrator. The facility also failed to provide a selection of venues that is suitable for residents or their representatives. This applies to all 170 residents residing the facility. The findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated January 13, 2025, by V1 (Administrator) showed the facility census was 170 residents. On January 14, 2025, at 3:03 PM, the facility's admission Packet which included the facility's Arbitration Agreement showed under General (q) Alternative Dispute Resolution: (i) Arbitration Agreement: .The Parties will cooperate with one another in selecting an arbitrator from the arbitration company panel of arbitrators and pursue diligently the arbitration . (Name of Association) Dispute Resolution Service will Administer the arbitration . If (Name of Association) or it's successor is not available to administer the arbitration, then the Facility will select another arbitration service to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Water Management Plan for Legionella. The facility also failed to perform hand hygiene during provisions of care. This applies to all 170 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: 1. The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated January 13, 2025, by V1 (Administrator) showed the facility census was 170 residents. The facility's Water Management Plan dated September 17, 2024, showed Overview: Scope: The Water Management Plan (WMP) outlines procedures for minimizing the risk of Legionnaires' disease for persons at [the facility] site. The water systems on the site are described in tables and flow diagrams; the systems requiring control measures are noted in the Hazard Analysis . Objective: The objective of the WMP is to minimize the risk of Legionnaires' disease by managing certain building water systems for the control of Legionella bacteria. Organization: The WMP will be overseen by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, identify, and document a resident's skin lesion. The facility also failed to follow physician orders to consult a dermatologist for skin lesions. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R18), reviewed for skin conditions in the sample of 34. The findings include: R18's face sheet showed her to be a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Vascular Dementia with mild anxiety, Chronic Diastolic Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, Personal history of Cerebral infarction, and Long Term Use of Anticoagulants. On January 13, 2025 at 10:21 AM, R18 was observed with a red lesion on the top of her nose and forehead. On January 14, 2025 at 2:27 PM, R18 was in the dining room and the red lesions to her nose and forehead were still present. V19 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated the lesions to R18 nose and forehead were skin cancer. V19 stated there are no treatments for the lesions. V19 stated they are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to notify the physician of a resident's significant weight loss and to consult the dietitian to evaluate a resident with significant weight loss. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R98) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 34. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, dementia, and major depressive disorder. R98's Weights and Vitals Summary dated January 16, 2025, showed on July 13, 2024, R98 weighed 158 pounds and on January 13, 2025, R98 weighed 127.7 pounds resulting in a 19.18 % (percent) weight loss in six months. The documentation continued to show on October 1, 2024, R98 weighed 138.6 pounds and on November 2, 2024, R98 weighed 128.2 pounds resulting in a 7.5% weight loss in one month. As of January 15, 2025, at 10:00 AM, the facility does not have documentation to show R98…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for laboratory tests for a resident receiving intravenous hydration. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R149) reviewed for laboratory services in the sample of 34. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R149 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including hyperosmolality (fluid and electrolyte imbalance disorder) and hypernatremia (elevated sodium levels), Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and chronic kidney disease. On January 13, 2025, at 10:50 AM, R149 was sitting in her wheelchair. R149 had intravenous fluids infusing. R149's Order Summary Report dated January 15, 2025, showed an order dated January 12, 2025, for laboratory tests every Monday. The report continued to show an order dated January 12, 2025, Sodium Chloride Intravenous Solution 0.45% (percent), use 1000 mL (milliliters) intravenously one time a day every Monday for IVF (Intravenous Fluids), HANG AFTER MORNING LABS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label, date, and store food items and maintain a clean kitchen. This applies to all residents that receive oral nutrition and foods prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (Form CMS-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-671) dated 2/20/24 documents that the total census was 162 residents. On 2/22/24 at 12:24 PM, V18 (Diet Office Assistant) said there is only 1 NPO (Nothing by Mouth) resident, and the other 161 residents eat from the facility kitchen. On 2/20/24 from 9:14 AM through 10:21 AM, the facility kitchen was toured in the presence of V3 (Director of Food and Nutrition), and the following was found: In the Cook's refrigerator: 1. A small bin of pureed ham with expiration date of 2/15. 2. A small bin of ground ham with expiration date of 1/31. 3. An unlabeled and undated opened package of what V3 said was baloney. 4. A 4 Quart bin of processed ham dated opened on 2/18 and expiration on 2/29. V3 said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents dependent upon staff for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) received nail grooming for 4 of 38 residents (R18, R101, R139, & R146) reviewed for ADLs in a sample of 38. The findings include: 1. On 02/20/24 at 11:05 AM, R18 was observed with long jagged nails, with brown substances under the nails. R18 said that she didn't like them that way and wanted them cut and filed. R18 has diagnoses including, cerebral atherosclerosis, and polyarthritis osteoporosis. R18's 11/5/24 Care plan showed an ADL self-care performance deficit related to Activity Intolerance, Dementia, Impaired balance, Limited Mobility. She was admitted to hospice services and the goal is comfort with interventions including, check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary. R18's 12/28/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed that R18 cognition is severely impaired, and in Section GG I. Personal hygiene R18 needs substantial/maximal assistance. 2. On 02/20/24 at 10:49 AM, R101 was observed with her fingernails long,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control while entering isolation, while feeding residents, and during incontinent care. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R1, R9, R59, R60, R76, R77, R89, R98, R104 and R109) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 38. The findings include: 1. On 2/22/24 at 10:39 AM, V6 (Social Services) was observed entering R59's room without gown and gloves. At 10:41 AM, V6 came out of R59's room. V6 said she went to issue R59 a notice of discharge. V6 only had on her N95 mask and goggles on when she entered the room. V6 said thought that all the PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) she was on was sufficient, she did not look at the isolation sign on the door. There was a sign for Contact Precautions and Droplet Precautions on the door. For the contact precaution sign, providers and staff must put on gloves and gown before entering the room, discard gloves and gown before exiting the room. R59's lab result of 2/14/24 showed that R59 tested positive for RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus). R59's EMR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$110,030 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $110,030 — penalty dated 2026-03-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED & INFIRM — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 27 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $506K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL