St Patrick's Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 402 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 216 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 333 beds and averages 261.9 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 71 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.93 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-08-25 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Advanced Directives indicated he/she was a Full Code (in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest, attempts at resuscitation would be initiated) and that he/she wanted to be transferred to the Hospital for care, the Facility failed to ensure nursing provided him/her with basic life saving measures including Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), in an attempt to resuscitate him/her. On [DATE] at approximately 3:50 P.M., Resident #1 was found unresponsive by Nurse #1, he/she was without a pulse or respirations, had no blood pressure and his/her skin was warm to the touch. Nurse #1 and the Nursing Supervisor both checked Resident #1's medical record to determine his/her code status, but misinterpreted what was indicated on his/her Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) Form, thought he/she had elected to be a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), and therefore did not administer CPR to him/her.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Comprehensive Plan of Care and Plan of Care [NAME], indicated he/she required extensive assistance from two staff members during transfers for safety, the Facility failed to ensure staff consistently implemented and followed interventions identified in his/her Plans of Care, when on 07/03/24, CNA #1 transferred Resident #1 using a Sit/Stand Lift device (lift device that helps individuals who have difficulty standing up, from a seated position), without having another staff member present to assist her with the transfer, Resident #1 became weak during the transfer, started to slide out of the lift seat, CNA #1 then tried to lower him/her to the floor, Resident #1 immediately complained of pain, was diagnosed with a right femur (thigh bone) fracture and required transfer, with admission to the Hospital for treatment. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 03/21/24, indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being at high risk of falls, was known to have poor safety awareness, weakness due to a stroke and required the assistance of two staff members for transfers, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with the necessary level of staff assistance during a transfer to prevent an incident/accident resulting in a serious injury. On 07/03/24, CNA #1 transferred Resident #1 with a Sit/Stand Lift device (device that helps individuals who have difficulty standing up, from a seated position) without having another staff member present to assist her, during the transfer Resident #1 started to slide out of the lift seat, CNA #1 then tried to lower him/her to the floor, Resident #1 immediately complained of pain to his/her right hip, was transferred to the Hospital Emergency Department (ED) and was diagnosed several days later with a right femur (thigh bone) fracture which required surgical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2024-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), whose primary spoken language was not English, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from abuse, when on 4/08/24, during the evening shift, when Resident #2 approached Nurse #1, who was in the hallway at the medication cart, to ask for his/her supplement, Nurse #1 yelled at Resident #2 in a humiliating and verbally aggressive manner saying, you are in America now, you need to learn to speak English! The altercation was witnessed by two other residents, who said Resident #2 was upset and crying after Nurse #1 yelled at him/her. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Prevention, Identification, Investigation and Reporting of Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment or Exploitation of Resident or Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated January 2023, indicated the following: - Employees, consultants, contractors, volunteers, and other caregivers will provide an environment for residents that is safe and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice relative to the administration of prescribed medication for one Resident (#145) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, for Resident #145, the facility failed to administer a Physician ordered antihypotensive medication (used to treat low blood pressure) as needed (PRN) when Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP - the top number of the blood pressure reading which indicates the force of circulating blood pushing against the artery when the heart beats) measurements were documented below 100 mmHg (millimeters of mercury) for the Resident. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures, dated 2017, included but was not limited to: -Purpose: To administer oral medications in a safe, accurate, and effective manner. -Review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) PRIOR to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Advance Directives (a written statement about a resident's wishes regarding medical treatment) were accurately executed for one Resident (#411) out of a total sample of 36 Residents. Specifically, for Resident #411, the facility failed to: -offer the Resident/ Responsible Party the opportunity to formulate and/or review an Advanced Directive for the Resident. -obtain a Physician's order to indicate an accurate code status when the Resident was admitted to the facility with an illegible Massachusetts Medical Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form and a handwritten, incomplete code status card. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Advance Directives, dated [DATE], indicated: -Upon admission, MD/Nursing will identify if the resident has an advance directive and if not, determine if the resident wishes to formulate an advance directive. -The MOLST will be in the front of the paper chart and all other advance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#232), out of a total sample of 36 residents, was free from physical restraints. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #232 was assessed for the use of a potential restraint (two stationary chairs), which were positioned in a way to prevent the Resident from moving freely around the room. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Restraints-Physical/Chemical, dated 6/14/24, indicated each resident shall be free from physical and/or chemical restraints imposed for the purposes of discipline or convenience and that are not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. The policy also included the following: -All resident's will be assessed for appropriateness of devices to treat their medical symptoms and ensure the least restrictive alternative is utilized for the least amount of time, to allow each resident and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being. -The facility prohibits the use of restraints to unnecessarily inhibit a resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance for activities of daily living (ADL - basic life care tasks that individuals perform on a daily basis to maintain their well-being which include grooming) for two Residents (#164 and #556) out of a total sample size of 36 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #164, ensure the Resident was offered and/or provided with grooming of facial hair when the Resident was dependent on facility staff for assist with grooming. 2. For Resident #556, ensure the Resident was offered and/or provided grooming of the fingernails when the Resident was dependent on facility staff for grooming. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), dated 11/2024 indicated but was not limited to the following: -The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that assistive devices to maintain hearing and enhance communication were utilized for one Resident (#234), out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, for Resident #234, the facility failed to ensure that ordered hearing aids were applied daily when the Resident required staff assistance for insertion and manipulation of the hearing aids so he/she could maintain hearing and communication abilities. Finding Included: Review of the facility policy titled Hearing Aid Placement, last revised 11/2022, indicated the following: -The facility will provide a system to safely maintain resident hearing aids in support of their resident rights and quality of life. -Hearing aid placement and removal will be documented on the electronic medical record. Resident #234 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including bilateral glaucoma and auditory hallucinations. Review of Resident #234's Audiology Consult dated 9/24/24, indicated: -Patient requires assistance with insertion and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services relative to enteral feeding (nutrients provided directly into the stomach), for one Resident (#111) out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, for Resident #111, the facility failed to ensure that enteral feeds and fluids being administered to the Resident were labeled and dated as appropriate. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Service: Enteral Feeding Management, dated 3/15/23, indicated the following: -Labeling: To avoid misinterpretation, a label should be affixed to all EN (enteral nutrition) formula administration containers (bags, bottles, syringes [used in syringe pump]). -The label should include: >patient demographics >formula type >enteral access delivery site >administration method >initials of the individual hanging the formula >time formula hung >date formula hung > Not for IV (intravenous) Use. -Labels should be standardized with standard components…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care and services that were consistent with professional standards of practice, for one Resident (#246), out of a total sample of 36 residents. Specifically, for Resident #246, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident's nebulizer setup equipment was appropriately labeled and dated and stored in a storage bag to prevent equipment contamination. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Nebulizer Therapy, last reviewed November 2024, indicated the following: -the 11 P.M. to 7 A.M. (night) nursing shift will date and label the tubing and bag. After the equipment has dried, place it in the labeled and dated plastic bag for storage until next use. -equipment to be changed weekly by the 11 P.M. to 7 A.M. nursing shift. The nebulizer machine will also be cleaned weekly by the 11 P.M. to 7 A.M. nursing shift. -mask and bag are changed weekly by the 11 P.M. to 7 A.M. nursing shift or as needed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a secure manner in one medication storage room (Sacred Heart Unit) out of four medication storage rooms observed, out of a total of eight medication storage rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that only authorized personnel had access to the medication storage room where prescription medications were stored on the Sacred Heart Unit. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage Safety, initiated 9/14/15, last reviewed/revised 11/2024, included but was not limited to: -The focus is the secure locking of the medication room on each unit. -The unit Nurses are responsible to maintain security of the medication room on their shift. -Each medication Nurse is informed of the need to keep the medication room Closed and Locked at all times. -Access to the medication room is by a key which is on the keychain of the Unit Nurse. On 2/20/25 at 9:15 A.M., the surveyor observed the Central Supply Manager (CSM) in the medication storage room on the Sacred…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2), the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy, when on 4/08/24 during the evening shift after the Nurse Supervisor received a report of an allegation of abuse from Nurse #2 that Nurse #1 had been verbally abusive towards to Resident #2, the Nurse Supervisor failed to immediately notify the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) of the alleged abuse, and did not suspend Nurse #1, as a result Nurse #1 continued to work the overnight shift (11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.) providing care to Resident #2 and other residents, placing them at risk for the potential for further abuse. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Abuse Policy, dated 02/2023, indicated that after ensuring the residents are protected, Nursing Home Staff must immediately report to his or her Supervisor or the Administrator any allegation or suspicion of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, or exploitation, including injuries of unknown source as well as any allegation or suspicion of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were treated with dignity during communal dining on one Unit (Sacred Heart), out of eight units observed. Specifically, the facility staff failed to be in a seated position while assisting Resident #96 during mealtime. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Assisted Dining Totally Dependent on Staff for Dining last revised June 2021, indicated the following: -Staff will provide the necessary level of assistance to those residents who are unable to feed themselves or who need assistance or encouragement to eat. -Staff will place tray within view of the resident. -Staff will sit down and make eye contact while assisting the resident. Resident #96 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with diagnoses including non-traumatic brain dysfunction (a dysfunction of the brain caused by internal factors) and muscle weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

$33,157 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-07-24
• $9,318 — penalty dated 2024-04-30
• $14,521 — penalty dated 2023-08-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED & INFIRM — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA