Teresian House Nursing Home Co INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 302 beds and averages 285.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2021-12-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical and facility record review, video footage, and staff interview during a recertification and abbreviated survey (Case # NY00287505) the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one (Resident #216) of 8 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, on 12/3/21 at 11:30 AM the facility failed to provide Resident #216, who was severely cognitively impaired, with supervision. Subsequently, Resident #216 was able to exit the building through a coded/locked door off the unit and 2 sets of alarmed doors exiting the facility for over two hours. Both alarmed doors were disabled by facility staff. Facility video footage revealed resident exited the facility at 11:30AM and facility staff did not discover the resident missing until lunch time at 12:15PM. In addition, facility staff did not follow their process for elopement when the facility staff member that exited through the coded/locked door did not observe and ensure the door closed and locked behind them; did not perform a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that its medication error rate did not exceed 5% for 1 (Resident #77) of 4 residents observed during a medication pass for a total of 25 observations. This resulted in a medication error rate of 24%. This is evidenced by: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Administering Medications, last reviewed 3/16/2023 and Last Revision: 11/5/2024, documented medications were administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation #2: medications may be administered within (1) hour before or after prescribed times. Scheduled medications designated as time-critical (medications that may cause harm or sub-therapeutic effect if administered before or after the scheduled time were administered at the scheduled time (for example, rapid-acting insulin) or within 30 minutes of the scheduled time. #8: The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify: a. right resident, b. right medication, c.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that residents were free of any significant medication errors for 2 (Resident #s 88 and 144) of 2 resident reviewed. Specifically, (a.) on 6/27/2024 Resident #88 received medications that were prescribed for another resident; (b.) on 11/02/2024 and 11/03/2024 Resident #144 did not receive a medication as prescribed. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that physician was notified, and that Resident #144 was monitored for side effects. This is evidenced by: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled Administering Medications, last reviewed 3/16/2023 and last Revision: 11/05/2024, documented medications were administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation #15: If a drug was withheld or refused, the nurse administering the medication should initial and code the space provided for that drug and dose. If resident refused medication after 3 attempts document in Electronic Medication Administration Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the recertification survey and an abbreviated survey (Case #NY00346710), the facility did not ensure that (a.) all alleged violations of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, were reported immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other official (including the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provided for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures; and (b.) reported the results of all investigations to the administrator or their designated representative, and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for 2 (Resident #s88 and 144) of 5 residents reviewed for reporting of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment was completed for a 1 (Resident #141) of 42 residents reviewed for significant changes in health status. Specifically, Resident #141 sustained a fractured wrist on 8/18/2024, and a fracture of the other wrist on 9/27/2024 after a fall on 9/04/2024. There was no documented evidence that a significant change assessment was done. This is evidenced by: The policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised 3/3/2023, documented that if a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition occurs, a comprehensive assessment of the resident's condition will be conducted as required by current OBRA regulations governing resident assessments and as outlined in the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment Instrument instruction manual. Resident #141 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct (difficulty adjusting to new situations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure Comprehensive Care Plans were reviewed and revised based on changing goals, preferences, and needs for 2 (Residents #83 and #261) of 62 residents reviewed. Specifically, for Resident #s 83 and 261, the facility did not ensure an interdisciplinary care plan meeting reviewed the comprehensive care plan to include weight monitoring. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated 04/22/2024, documented it was the facilities policy to promptly identify changes in condition, notify his or her attending physician, and the resident/representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. The Interdisciplinary Team must review and update the care plan at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment. The assessments of residents were ongoing and care plans were revised as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure a dependent resident was provided with appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve their language and communication for 1 t (Resident #268) of 1 resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #268 was not provided with an adequate, structured approach and tools to communicate effectively in accordance with professional standards of care. This is evidenced by: The facility's Policy on Communication with Residents with Speech Impairments reviewed on 1/24/2024, documented its purpose was to provide staff with a structured approach to communicate effectively and compassionately with residents affected by speech impediments due to stroke, ensuring clear, respectful, and supportive interactions. Procedures include use of communication aids; non-verbal cues; environment adjustments, documentation, and staff training. The New York State Department of Health Code, Rules and Regulation, Volume C (Title 10) Section 415.3 Effective…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during a recertification survey, the facility did not ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 (Resident #83) of 9 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. Specifically, Resident #83 was not provided assistance with personal hygiene during care leaving facial hair to grow on the upper lip. This is evidenced by: Resident #83 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses of anxiety, Alzheimer's, and mood disorder. The Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 01/19/2024 documented the resident could rarely understand and rarely be understood by others; resident was cognitively impaired. The facility policy Activities of Daily Living Support effective 03/16/2023 documented residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. The Comprehensive Care Plan dated 9/22/2023 documented the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the necessary respiratory care and services that were in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #'s 148) of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen administration. Specifically, Resident #148's portable oxygen tank ran out of oxygen. This is evidenced by: A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Oxygen Administration, last revised on 5/09/2024, documented that oxygen would be administered by licensed nurses with a physician's order. Oxygen could be delivered via an E size oxygen tank for short-term use and when the resident was not on their concentrator. Resident #148 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the right upper bronchus or lung (a cancerous tumor located in the upper lobe of the right lung, specifically within the bronchus, the airway leading to the lung lobe), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (breathing disorder when there is not enough oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interviews during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, or served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 2 of 14 resident unit kitchenettes. Specifically, refrigerators and freezers were not operating appropriately. This is evidenced by: A review of facility policy for the environment last revised 3/04/2024 documents that the facility was to maintain a clean and safe environment. The policy documents the facility would maintain the building and all department equipment to comply with all current Federal, State, and Local regulations and guidelines. The facility should maintain a regularly scheduled maintenance on all department equipment and repair as needed. During observations on the Carmel Garden [NAME] Unit on 11/06/2024 at 10:34 AM, the resident kitchenette refrigerator flashed an E-1 error code. During observations on the second-floor west unit on 11/06/2024 at 10:46 AM, the resident kitchenette freezer had a temperature reading of 33 degrees Fahrenheit. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during an abbreviated survey (Case # NY00279837), the facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 (Resident #s 1 and 2) of 3 residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility (1) did not ensure Residents #1 and #2 received their own medication as ordered when Resident #2 received Resident #1's antibiotic for 5 days from [DATE] through [DATE] for a total of 5 doses, and (2) did not ensure the electronic medical record was accurate for Resident #s 1 and 2 for those 5 days. This is evidenced by: The Policy and Procedure titled Physician's Order Entry last revised [DATE] documented physician orders would be entered by a licensed nurse in a timely manner. It documented all new orders entered in the electronic medical record order portal by a licensed nurse must be confirmed by a second nurse. It documented the nurse would document in the progress notes and on the 24-hour report that the new order was received and entered. If the order was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED & INFIRM — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 108 rows in the source record cover these 39 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY