Garvey Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 132 beds and averages 127.5 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.70 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess a resident for safety in a chair after a known history of falls from the chair, resulting in a fall with fracture for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 2), and failed to follow fall prevention interventions for one of 39 residents reviewed (Resident 5) who had a history of falls. Findings include: The facility's policy regarding accidents and incidents, dated July 2, 2024, revealed that if a fall is involved the resident must be assessed by the professional (registered) nurse supervisor and additional assessment as appropriate. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 2, dated November 13, 2023, indicated that the resident was sometimes understood and could sometimes understand others, required extensive assistance of one for ambulation and transfers, and extensive assistance of one for bathing and toileting. A nursing note for Resident 2, dated November 12, 2023. at 4:14 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative in advance of the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications (medications that affect the persons mental state, emotions and behavior) and the treatment alternatives prior to initiating the administration of the medication for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 47). Findings include: A facility policy related to psychotropic medications, dated June 20, 2025, indicated that once it is determined that a psychotropic medication will be initiated and/or increased, the resident and/or representative will be informed of the rationale for the medication order, the benefits/risks associated with the medication use, and of alternatives for the medication. Consent for use of and the education of the resident and/or resident representative regarding the medication order must be documented in the medical record prior to initiation of the medication. Informed consent will be documented in the medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were within reach for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 21). Findings include: A review of a facility policy regarding physical and functional needs, dated June 20, 2025, indicated that call bells are always kept within reach of the resident unless otherwise indicated in their plan of care. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's care needs and abilities) for Resident 21, dated March 26, 2026, indicated that the resident was usually able to make herself understood and could usually understand others, had cognitive impairment, required moderate assistance from staff for transfers from bed/chair and chair/bed and toilet transfers, required moderate assistance from staff with ambulating, had a fall since the previous assessment without injury, had a motion sensor alarm used daily and had diagnoses that included dementia and orthostatic hypotension (low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the attending physician and legal representative was notified concerning a change in condition for one of 41 residents reviewed (Resident 53). Findings include: The facility's policy for Change in Condition Reporting, dated June 20, 2025, indicated that the facility shall promptly notify the resident, his/her attending physician and legal representative of changes in the resident's conditions and/or status. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 53, dated March 23, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for his daily care needs, and had diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia (a non-cancerous condition that causes the prostate to enlarge and obstruct urine flow). A care plan for Resident 53, dated August 12, 2024, indicated that Resident 53 had the potential for complications with urinary elimination and required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation to rule out abuse or neglect for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: A facility policy regarding abuse reporting, dated June 20, 2025, indicated that all covered individuals (owner, personnel, volunteers, agents and contractors) must promptly report any incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, including injuries of an unknown source suspected to be abuse, misappropriation of resident property, and any actions toward a resident which may be considered a crime by local or state laws. An injury should be classified as an injury of unknown source when both of the following criteria are met: the source of the injury was not observed by any person or the source could not be explained by the resident, and the injury is suspicious because of the extent of the injury or the location of the injury or the number of injuries observed at one particular point in time or the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan was updated/revised to reflect the resident's specific care needs for two of 43 residents reviewed (Residents 1 and 6).Findings include: A facility policy regarding care plans, dated June 20, 2025, indicated that resident care plans are reviewed or modified at least quarterly or upon a significant change in the resident's condition, or according to the target date indicated on the care plan. When immediate need care plan problems resolve or stabilize, the immediate need care plan may be resolved or incorporated into the core care plan. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 1, dated April 13, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, wore hearing aids, understood and could understand others, required assistance with care needs, had diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and received dialysis (filtering the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 9), and failed to ensure that psychiatric recommendations for medication changes were completed timely for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 47). Findings include: The facility's arm and leg protectors' policy, dated June 20, 2025, indicated that staff should follow physician's orders for arm and leg protectors. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment (mandated to assess the resident abilities and care needs) for Resident 9, dated May 14, 2026, revealed that the resident was understood and could understood and was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's care plan, dated March 13, 2026, revealed that the resident was to always wear leg protectors except for during hygiene care to help prevent skin breakdown related to impaired skin integrity. Physician's orders for Resident 9, dated February 25, 2023, included an order for the facility to use protocols as indicated to prevent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician of a wound that progressed to a pressure ulcer, failed to ensure treatments were in place to prevent the progression of pressure ulcers, and failed to ensure that pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: Review of a facility policy regarding wound management program, dated June 20, 2025, indicated that all wounds, skin abnormalities, pressure ulcers/injuries, non-pressure related ulcers/injuries, and surgical wounds shall be identified, assessed, treated, and monitored to promote healing and prevent infections. All pressure ulcers/injuries, non-pressure related ulcers, and/or wounds will have ongoing evaluation by the interdisciplinary team and/or the in-house wound physician. The team leader will complete a skin observation tool under the assessment tab in the medical record. This tool is then printed and given to the Registered Nurse (RN) supervisor for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies, as well as review of clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that neurological checks were completed per facility policy for a resident who sustained a head injury after a fall for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 24), and failed to ensure the environment remained as free from accident hazards as possible, by not completing elopement risk assessments quarterly per facility policy for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 115). Findings include: A facility policy related to neurological status monitoring, dated June 20, 2025, indicated that the neurological status of a resident will be monitored following suspected head trauma/injury. Parameters will be monitored every 15 minutes for two hours, every 30 minutes for two hours, every one hour for four hours, then every eight hours for 16 hours until 24 hours have passed, unless otherwise ordered by the physician. Neurological flow sheets found to be incomplete will result in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policies and clinical records, as well as observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received proper care for an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine from the bladder) for two of 43 residents reviewed (Residents 47, 92). Findings include: The facility's policy regarding urinary catheters, dated June 20, 2025, indicated that the purpose of the policy was to ensure safe handling of the urinary catheter in order to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections. This would include ensuring that the catheter bag is in a catheter bag cover/dignity bag, and that the dignity bag and catheter tubing are off the floor. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 47, dated March 11, 2026, indicated that the resident was cognitively impaired, was dependent of staff for daily care needs, had an indwelling urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policies and clinical records, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain accountability for controlled medications (drugs with the potential to be abused) for one of 43 residents reviewed (Resident 6). Findings include: A facility policy regarding controlled substances, dated June 20, 2025, indicated that when a controlled substance (C2-C4) is removed for administration and must be destroyed, the destruction and documentation must be witnessed by two licensed nurses. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (a mandated assessment of a resident's abilities and care needs) for Resident 6, dated May 4, 2026, revealed that the resident was cognitively intact, received routine and as needed pain medication, received opioid medications (a controlled pain medication), and had a diagnosis of cancer. Physician's orders for Resident 6, dated February 19, 2026, included an order for the resident to receive 50 micrograms (mcg) of Fentanyl transdermal patch (a controlled pain medication administered through the skin) to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$40,641 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $40,641 — penalty dated 2024-08-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED & INFIRM — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA