Mother Angeline McCrory Manor
5199 East Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43213 · Non profit - Church related · 126 certified beds · (614) 751-5700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 10.0% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.6% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 28.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.9% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.9% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.9% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.2% | 24.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.0% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.47 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.96 | 1.80 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
55.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 211 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 55.7%CMS range 48.3–63.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 7.4–13.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 45.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 33.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 5.3–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.00 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 126 beds and averages 119.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.80 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, observation, interview, policy review and review of provided videos and pictures, the facility failed to ensure residents with trauma received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This affected one resident (#55) out of three residents reviewed for abuse.Findings Include:Review of Resident #55's medical Record revealed an admission date of 06/05/25 and medical diagnosis of covid-19, weakness, need for personal assistance with care, pain due to trauma, cerebral vascular accident, abnormal gait and mobility, dysphagia, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, wedge compression fracture of fifth lumbar vertebra, hyperlipidemia, cervical disc degeneration, depression, anxiety, dementia mild with mood disturbance, muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of the undated document titled Care for [Resident #55] revealed the residents family brought up some care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical record, observations, staff interview, CDC website review, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to serve food in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 116 out of 117 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #72) as not eating food from the kitchen. The facility also failed to thoroughly perform legionella surveillance. This had the potential to affect all 117 residents residing in the facility. The facility also failed to provide designated disposal bins for used personal protective equipment in a resident's room when the resident was under contact precautions. This affected one resident (#125) out of three residents (#48, #72 and #125) reviewed for transmission-based precautions. The facility census was 117.Findings include:1. Observation of food lunch service on 07/23/25 from 11:55 A.M. to 12:40 P.M. revealed that while recording temperatures of the food in the steam wells, Dietary Aide #…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for the use of antipsychotic medications and to identify target behaviors and monitor the target behaviors for the use of antipsychotic medications. This affected five residents (#12, #45, #71, #93 and #106) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 117.Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an initial admission date of 02/23/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, dependence on wheelchair, dementia, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, restless leg syndrome, major depressive disorder, constipation, overactive bladder, insomnia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the plan of care dated 02/24/25 revealed the resident used an psychotropic medication (Trazadone) related to depression. Interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate coordination with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process by submitting an incorrect list of mental health diagnoses. This affected four (Resident #6, #12, #79 and #90) out of five residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 117. Findings include:1. Review of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) identification screen dated 05/13/25 for Resident #9 completed by facility staff noted no mental health diagnoses. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/17/25 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features, delusional disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the care plan dated 05/19/25 revealed Resident #9 had a mood problem related to diagnoses of insomnia, dementia, and depression. Interventions included administering medications as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-29 · tag F0646 — patternNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the state mental health authority was notified of updated and accurate mental health diagnoses. This affected four (Resident #6, #12, #79 and #90) out of five residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). The facility census was 117. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/17/25 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, mood disorder due to known physiological condition with depressive features, delusional disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) identification screen dated 05/13/25 for Resident #9 completed by facility staff noted no mental health diagnoses. Review of the care plan dated 05/19/25 documented Resident #9 had a mood problem related to diagnoses of insomnia, dementia, and depression. Interventions included administering medications as ordered,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper skin monitoring for Residents #79, #95, and #58; failed to remove medication patches as ordered for Resident #50; failed to ensure Geri sleeves and related care plans were implemented for Resident #58; and failed to monitor and implement dental care recommendations following the extraction of seven teeth for Resident #49. These failures affected five (Residents #79, #95, #58, #50, and #49) out of 26 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 117.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses of morbid obesity, type two diabetes mellitus, mixed hyperlipidemia, shortness of breath and hypertension. Review of physician order dated 03/01/25 revealed clonidine transdermal patch weekly 0.3 milligrams per 24 hours. Apply one patch every seven days for hypertension and remove prior to application of new patch.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure air mattress bed settings were appropriate and ordered for four (Residents #2, #8, #53 and #70) of four residents who were at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The facility census was 117.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2, revealed an admission date of 11/1/22 . Diagnoses included but were not limited to dementia, weakness, need for assistance for personal care, and lack of coordination. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of not assessed with memory problem with short term and long term memory. The resident was assessed to require total dependence with toilet hygiene, shower/bathe self, bed mobility, and transfers. this resident was also assessed to be at risk for pressure ulcers.Review of the active care pian for Resident #2 revealed her to have a potential for developing pressure injuries due related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records, observations, staff interviews and review of company policies, the facility failed to provide supervision with dining for residents that were identified as choking risks. This affected two residents (Resident #4 and 18) out of thirty three residents that the facility identified as at risk for choking. The facility also failed to ensure that transfers were completed as required for Resident #116 and that the call light cord wiring was not exposed for Resident #79. These affected two residents (Resident #79 and #116) out of six residents that were reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 117 residents.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included vascular dementia, multiple sclerosis and postural kyphosis. Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed that he was cognitively intact. Review of dietary progress note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pain management monitoring, evaluations and indication for usage for residents. This affected four (Resident #58, #9, #50 and #13) out of five residents reviewed for pain. The facility also failed to ensure Dexcom (continuous glucose monitoring system) was not expired, this affected one (Resident #114) out of one reviewed for insulin usage. The facility census was 117. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the left patella, weakness, age-related osteoporosis, and pain in the left leg. Review of care plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #9 is at risk for alteration in comfort related to arthritis and left patella fracture. Interventions include completing a comprehensive pain evaluation, administering pain medications as ordered, monitoring and documenting the effectiveness of pain interventions, providing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store food in a safe and sanitary method. This had the potential to affect 116 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #72) who did not eat food from the kitchen. The facility census was 117 residents.Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 07/21/25 from 8:18 A.M. to 8:35 A.M. revealed that in the dry storage area, there was an opened undated box of elbow macaroni, an opened undated package of spaghetti, and an opened one-gallon container of soy sauce that was undated. Observation of the kitchen on 07/21/25 from 8:18 A.M. to 8:35 A.M. revealed that in the freezer there was an opened unlabeled and undated container of french fries. Observation of the kitchen on 07/21/25 from 8:18 A.M. to 8:35 A.M. revealed that in the walk in refrigerator, there was an uncovered bun rack that contained three uncovered sheet pans full of diced potatoes and two sheets of uncovered raw burger patties. Observation of the fans in the walk-in refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment in multiple resident areas. This affected one (Resident #50) out of six residents reviewed for environmental concerns. Additionally the facility failed to maintain the cleanliness of common areas this had the potential to affect 40 residents (#40, #14, #58, #2, #41, #93, #85, #24, #95, #13, #75, #114, #115, #99, #30, #80, #97, #10, #89, #49, #131, #6, #73, #69, #104, #86, #1, #51, #76, #71, #26, #9, #62, #34, #21, #60, #79, #50, #64, and #74) identified using the affected areas. The facility census was 117. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with diagnoses of type two diabetes mellitus, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, morbid obesity, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and gastrostomy status. Review of care plan dated 03/03/25 revealed Resident #50 has potential nutritional problem related to need to mechanically altered diet, need for tube feed due to inadequate oral intake and need…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was in reach for Resident #03. This affected one resident (#03) of four residents reviewed for call light accessibility. The facility census was 117.Findings included:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #03 was admitted to facility on 12/14/2024. Pertinent diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, adult failure to thrive, heart failure, major depressive disorder.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 04/25/25 for Resident #03 revealed she was dependent on staff for toileting, rolling left to right, sit to lying and lying to sitting on side of bed.Review of care plan focus for Resident #03 dated 04/10/25 revealed Resident #03 was at increased risk for falls and intervention suggested was for staff to be sure resident's call light was within reach.Observation and interview on 07/22/25 at 2:22 P.M. of Resident #03 in bed with call light behind the resident, out of sight and out of reach. Resident #03 confirmed she was unable to see or reach the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure private medical record information for Resident #03 was not visible to facility visitors. This affected one resident (#03) of four residents reviewed for privacy concerns. The facility census was 117.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #03 was admitted to facility on 12/14/2024. Pertinent diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, adult failure to thrive, heart failure, major depressive disorder, hyperthyroidism and ileostomy status.Observation on 07/21/25 at 9:35 A.M. on the outside door to room of Resident #03 a sign which said, Synthroid - take whole- no crushing it - 4 hours before breakfast. Place bottom of ostomy bag towards right wall, not over crotch.Observation and interview on 07/22/2025 at 2:45 P.M. the sign remained on outside of door of Resident #03. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #226 confirmed the sign was on the door, confirmed she knew it was HIPAA violation and said the sign had been there since she started in February. CNA #226…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical record, family interview, staff interviews, dentist interview, review of facility self-reported incident investigation, review of hospital notes, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of an injury of unknown origin. This affected one resident (Resident #48) that was reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 117 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed that Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, anxiety disorder and unspecified dementia with mood disturbance. Review of Resident #48's comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed that she had modified independence for daily decision making. She was assessed as needing touch assistance for transfers and touch assist for rolling from lying on her back to left and right side. Review of Resident #48's activities of daily living (ADL) care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to perform oral assessments on a resident. This affected one resident out (Resident #58) out of twenty nine residents reviewed. The facility census was 117 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident # 58 revealed that Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic pain, Alzheimer's disease and chronic kidney disease stage 3. Review of Resident #58's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 out of 15, which suggested moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance with oral hygiene and personal hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. She was assessed as having no dental concerns. Review of Resident #58's nursing quarterly assessments on 03/01/25 and 05/02/25 revealed that the nurse did not assess her oral and dental status.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure documented diagnoses were accurate for Resident #12. This affected one resident (#12) out of five residents reviewed. Facility census was 117.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a weeklong hospitalization. On 07/24/25 at 8:46 A.M., a review of the medical record via the electronic charting system Point Click Care (PCC) revealed Resident #12 had a primary ICD admitting diagnosis F28 which was listed as, other psychotic disorder not due to a substance or known physiological condition with a start date of 05/07/24 and entry date of 05/09/25. Additional diagnoses included spinal stenosis; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance; unspecified mood (affective disorder); adjustment disorder, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere, severe, with agitation; major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate Preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) Level I screenings for residents with qualifying mental health diagnoses. This affected one (Resident #90) out of five residents reviewed for PASRR screenings accuracy. The facility census was 117. Findings include:Review of Preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) identification screen dated 05/12/25 for Resident #90 revealed diagnosis of dementia however no active mental health disorders listed. Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed an admission date of 05/14/25 with diagnoses of dementia, bipolar disorder, and history of mental and behavioral disorders. Review of care plan dated 05/16/25 revealed Resident #90 has a mood problem interventions include administer medications as ordered, educate family and resident of treatment and monitor/record mood concerns or changes. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans reflected resident care needs. This affected three residents (#12, #45, and #114) out of four reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 117.1.Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a weeklong hospitalization. On 07/24/25 at 8:46 A.M., a review of the medical record via the electronic charting system Point Click Care (PCC) revealed Resident #12 had a primary ICD admitting diagnosis F28 which was listed as, other psychotic disorder not due to a substance or known physiological condition with a start date of 05/07/24 and entry date of 05/09/25. Additional diagnoses included spinal stenosis; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance; unspecified mood (affective disorder); adjustment disorder, dementia in other disease classified elsewhere, severe, with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure shaving needs were completed for two residents (#79 and #120) who required assistance with needs for personal care. Four residents were reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 117.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #120, revealed an admission date of 05/18/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, vascular dementia, weakness and need for assistance personal care. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of rarely/never understood. The resident was assessed to require partial/moderate assistance with bed mobility and transfers with substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe self and toilet hygiene. Review of the active plan of care revealed Resident #120 had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop an individualized activity program to meet one resident (#45) needs. This affected one (Resident #45) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 117.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an initial admission date of 02/23/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, dependence on wheelchair, dementia, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, restless leg syndrome, major depressive disorder, constipation, overactive bladder, insomnia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the plan of care dated 02/25/25 revealed the resident was a new long term care resident who pursues independent leisure activities, may benefit from groups for social and recreational needs, assimilation to new surroundings, glasses worn for reading and may require wheelchair assistance when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment for a contracture and plan of care was in place for one Resident (#95) of one that was reviewed for position and mobility. The facility census was 117.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #95, revealed an admission date of 08/09/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to cerebral infarction, cognitive communication deficit, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and dementia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of the resident is rarely/never understood. The resident was assessed to require total dependence on toilet hygiene, shower/bathe self, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the active plan of care for Resident #95 revealed none for care and treatment of the contracture to her left hand. Review of the hospice note dated 01/14/25 for Resident #95 revealed a contracture to the left hand upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were provided as ordered by the physician for one (Resident #48) of four residents reviewed for nutritional support. The facility also failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered for two (Residents #9 and #13) of four residents reviewed for nutritional support. The facility census was 117. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 09/17/21 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia, weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy, type two diabetes mellitus, and abnormal weight loss. Review of care plan dated 09/21/21 revealed Resident #13 has a potential nutritional problem related to dementia, hypertension, alcohol dependence, variable oral intake, unintentional weight loss, and use of an appetite stimulant. Interventions include obtaining and monitoring lab and diagnostic work as ordered, obtaining weights as ordered, providing and serving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer an enteral feeding per physician's orders. The facility also did not date the enteral formula container with the hang date and/or time. This affected one (Resident #72) out of two residents reviewed for tube feedings. The facility census was 117 residents. Findings include: Resident #72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, dysphagia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #72's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed that his cognitive skills for daily decision making were moderately impaired. He was assessed as being dependent for his oral hygiene, personal hygiene and for sit to stand positioning. He was assessed as being substantial to maximal assistance for bed mobility. He was assessed as having a feeding tube and receiving 51% or more of his total calories from his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the nebulizer medication delivery system as stored in a manner to prevent contamination. This affected one (Resident #116) of one resident reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 117.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #116 revealed an initial admission date of 06/01/21 with the diagnoses including but not limited to polyosteoarthritis, zoster, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, anemia, congestive heart failure, asthma, dry eye syndrome, myopia, presbyopia, constipation, abdominal aortic aneurysm, seasonal allergic allergies, hyperlipidemia, aortic valve stenosis, overactive bladder, insomnia, presence of cardiac pacemaker, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of the plan of care dated 06/02/21 revealed the resident experienced and was at risk for respiratory insufficiency related to asthma, obstructive sleep apnea, seasonal allergies, history…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure long-acting narcotic pain medication was available for administration. This affected one resident (Resident #15) out of five residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 117. Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #15 revealed an initial admission date of 6/02/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, weakness, need for assistance with personal care, dependence on wheelchair, history of falling, pain in right hip, anemia, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, depression, anxiety disorder, obesity and low back pain. The resident was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of the resident's admission pain assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident denied any pain. Review of the plan of care dated 06/03/25 revealed the resident was at risk for alteration in comfort. Interventions included complete pain evaluation upon admission and as needed, give pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was below 5%. This affected two (Resident #6 and #48) out of four residents observed during medication administration. 27 opportunities of medication administration were observed and 2 of the 27 medications were not administered in accordance with physician's orders, resulting in a medication error rate of 7.41%. The facility census was 117.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 06/05/25 with diagnoses of encephalopathy, hyperlipidemia, cerebral infarction and hypercholesterolemia.Review care plan dated 06/06/25 indicated Resident #48 has altered cardiovascular status related to hypertension and cardiomegaly. Interventions include assessing for chest pain and shortness of breath, monitoring lung sounds and reporting changes, and monitoring, documenting, and reporting any signs or symptoms of coronary artery disease.Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the transfer was documented in the resident's medical record. This affected one resident (#49) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 117.Findings Include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #49 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] with the diagnoses including but not limited to dementia with psychotic disturbances, dysphagia, cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, congestive heart failure, insomnia, major depressive disorder, presence of cardiac pacemaker, hyperlipidemia, anemia, constipation, chronic pain, atrial fibrillation and hypothyroidism. The resident expired on [DATE] at the facility. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive deficit. Review of the resident's change in condition evaluation dated [DATE] revealed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, interview and policy review, the faciliy failed to ensure residents were free from abuse. This affected one (Resident #8) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Record review revealed former Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, dementia, hypertension, and end stage renal disease. The resident was discharged [DATE] to the hospital. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/28/25, revealed Resident #8 had impaired cognition. The resident required maximum staff assistance for bed mobility, transfers, bathing, and ambulation. Review of the facility's investigation file revealed on 05/15/25 former Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #22 admitted to having a picture of Resident #8 on his personal cell phone. During an interview on 06/03/24 at 1:40 P.M., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, document review, and policy review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infections when they failed to follow droplet precautions for Resident #90 and failed to properly clean a blood glucose monitoring machine for Resident #3. This had the potential to affect four (Resident #3, #76, #78, and #79) Residents who received blood glucose monitoring on the two East hallway The facility census was 106. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #90 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of: congestive heart failure, hypothyroidism, atherosclerotic heart disease, atrail fibrillation, and hypertension. Review of the [DATE] admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident is cognitively intact and uses a walker and wheelchair to aid in mobility. Review of a Physician Order dated [DATE] revealed Isolation Precautions: Droplet, for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital reports, review of facility investigation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and proper wheelchair transport resulting in a fall. This affected one resident (#7) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 113. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, chronic kidney disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, weakness, failure to thrive, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the fall risk assessment, dated 05/03/24, revealed Resident #7 was determined to be at an increased risk for falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/08/24, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The assessment further revealed the resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living and mobility. The resident's mobility device was a wheelchair. Review of the Care Plan dated 12/22/17 revealed the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of not 5 percent or greater. This affected four (Resident #67, #111, #113 and #131) of six residents observed for medication administration. Five errors were observed out of 35 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 14.2%. The census was 111. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #67 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression, high blood pressure and pain. Review of the Order Summary dated March 2024 revealed medications to administer included Tylenol Extra Strength 500 milligrams (mg) twice a day for osteoarthritis and Sertraline HCL 50 mg give 1.5 tablet by mouth in the morning for depression. On 03/28/24 at 8:13 A.M., observation of Resident #67's medication administration revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 administered medications including acetaminophen 500 mg with diphenhydramine 25 mg and Sertraline 50 mg. LPN #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the satellite kitchens were maintained in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 113 of 113 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation on 09/27/23 from 2:05 P.M. to 2:20 P.M. of the satellite kitchens revealed the following concerns: a. Observation of the second-floor kitchen revealed three food carts that had a buildup of food debris and splatters. Additionally, in the refrigerator there was a stack of cheese wrapped in plastic wrap. The cheese was poorly wrapped, the plastic wrap was wet with an unidentifiable substance, and was not labeled or dated. b. Observation of the third-floor kitchen revealed two food carts with a buildup of food debris and splatter. Additionally, observation of the steam table revealed the wells had a build up of calcium and food debris. The water in the steam table was brown. c. Observation of the fourth-floor kitchen (which was additionally observed during meal service at 11:30 A.M.) revealed two food carts with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were dated and appropriate rationale was provided regarding gradual dose reductions. This affected three residents (Resident #43, #74 and #85) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 116. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #74 medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, hemiplegia to the right side, psychosis, seizures, and weakness. A further review revealed Resident #74 was cognitively impaired and required assistance from staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks. Review of Resident #74 physician orders revealed the resident received anti-anxiety medication lorazepam 0.5 milligrams (mg) daily for anxiety, anti-psychotic medication perphenazine 2 mg at bedtime for psychosis, and anti-seizure medication levetiracetam 100mg per milliliter (ml) give 5 ml every twelve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records. This affected five residents (#23, #88, #71, #66, and #85) of 24 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 116. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 05/27/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral infarction, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, dementia, and fibromyalgia. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 had severely impaired cognition. She was totally dependent for bathing. Review of the plan of care dated 06/27/22 revealed Resident #66 had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to weakness, abnormal gait, dementia. Resident #66 had noted fluctuations with level of assistance. Interventions included fluctuations with level of assistance, preferring to stay in bed most days, extensive to dependent with staff assistance for dressing, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide skilled nursing facility advanced beneficiary notices (SNFABN) with estimated costs upon discharge from Medicare Part A skilled services for two (#101 and #87) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary protection notification review. The facility census was 116. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #101's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease and transient cerebral ischemic attack. The resident was discharged from Medicare Part A skilled services on 06/30/23, and remained in the facility. The medical record did not contain an SNFABN with remaining estimated costs for Resident #101. 2. Review of Resident #87's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of attention and concentration deficit following cerebral infarction. The resident was discharged from Medicare Part A skilled services on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, medical record review, review of shower sheets, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (Resident #85) hair was washed and one resident's (Resident #88) unwanted facial hair was removed. This affected two (Residents #85 and #88) of eight residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 116. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an initial admission date on 03/22/21 and a readmission date on 04/09/21. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Type II diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy, stroke, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), colostomy status, fibromyalgia, other chronic pain, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and drug induced subacute dyskinesia (abnormal movements). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #85 had intact cognition and scored 15 out…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have weekend activities and daily independent activities available. This affected two residents (#41 and #62) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 116. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 02/02/17 with diagnoses including dementia, type II diabetes, dysphagia, psychotic disorder with delusions, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and memory deficit following cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 was rarely or never understood. Review of the plan of care dated 07/27/23 revealed Resident #41 required structured activities due to diagnoses, need for verbal or tactile cueing, and need for assistance for mobility. Interventions included involving the resident in daily facility routine, reminding, and encouraging to attend activities of interest, providing leisure supplies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of pharmacy delivery receipts, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hospice notes were kept on-site and readily available to staff for one resident (Resident #89). The facility failed to administer as needed (PRN) blood pressure medication as ordered to one resident (Resident #67). The facility failed to timely treat tardive dyskinesia (involuntary, repetitive movements often caused by long-term use of some psychiatric medications) for one resident (Resident #85). This affected one (Resident #89) of two residents reviewed for hospice services and two (Residents #67 and #85) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 116. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an original admission date on 06/17/22 and a readmission date on 07/13/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease, dementia, pneumonia (07/14/23), esophageal obstruction (07/14/23), type II diabetes mellitus without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing interventions were in place for Resident #41. This affected one resident (#41) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 02/02/17 with diagnoses including dementia, type two diabetes, dysphagia, psychotic disorder with delusions, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and memory deficit following cerebral infarction. Review of the physician order dated 05/10/23 revealed Resident #41 was to be encouraged to lay down after meals due to wounds on the sacrum. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2023 revealed this was marked as completed on 09/25/23, 09/26/23, and 09/27/23. Review of the plan of care dated 05/12/23 revealed Resident #41 was at risk for development of pressure injuries and other skin impairments related to weakness, impaired mobility, diagnoses,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to complete assessments for continuation of an appropriate restorative program. This affected two residents (Resident #43 and Resident #74) of two residents reviewed for Restorative Therapy. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of Resident #74 medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis including Alzheimer's disease, hemiplegia to the right side, psychosis, seizures, and weakness. A further review revealed Resident #74 was cognitively impaired and required assistance from staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks. Review of Resident #74 assessments revealed the last Restorative Therapy Assessments was completed on 08/05/19. Review of Resident #74 physician orders revealed an order dated 08/15/22 for a Restorative ambulation therapy program to ambulate up to 135 feet with Resident #74 pushing the wheelchair with assist of a staff member six to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following a choking episode for one resident (Resident #89). This affected one (Resident #89) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 116. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #89 revealed an original admission date on 06/17/22 and a readmission date on 07/13/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's Disease, dementia, pneumonia (07/14/23), esophageal obstruction (07/14/23), type II diabetes mellitus without complications, heart disease, and encounter for palliative care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #89 has impaired cognition and scored six out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment. Resident #89 required extensive assistance to total dependence on one to two staff to complete Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Resident #89 received hospice services.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were in place for an indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one resident (Resident #361) of one residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of Resident #361 medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the admitting diagnoses including rectal cancer, encephalopathy, weakness, hallucinations, urinary tract infection, and high blood pressure. Further review revealed Resident #361 had intact cognition and required assistance from staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) tasks. Review of Resident #361 admission and current physician orders revealed no indication for the use of the indwelling urinary catheter and no orders for the care and/or maintenance of the resident's indwelling urinary catheter. Review of Resident #361 care plan dated 09/08/23 revealed Resident #361 had an indwelling urinary catheter and staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of medication administration records, and facility policy review, the facility failed to attempt a variety of non-pharmacological interventions and did not include parameters for administering as needed (PRN) pain medications to one resident (Resident #85). The facility also failed to ensure appropriate monitoring for antipsychotic medication side effects was completed. This affected two residents (Resident #5 and #85) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 116. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an initial admission date on 03/22/21 and a readmission date on 04/09/21. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Type II diabetes mellitus with polyneuropathy, stroke, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), colostomy status, fibromyalgia, other chronic pain, spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy lumbosacral region, major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one resident (#71) with a documented lactose intolerance received food free from dairy products containing lactose. This affected one resident (#71) out of one resident reviewed for food allergies or food intolerances. The facility census was 116. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of left foot and ankle, type 2 diabetes mellitus, acute kidney failure, acquired absence of right leg below knee, osteoarthritis, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was cognitively intact and independent for eating. On 09/26/23 at 9:12 A.M. interview with Resident #71 revealed she had some food allergies and was lactose intolerant. Resident #71 shared her menu had her allergies and lactose intolerance listed but she was often served foods…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain accurate resident influenza and pneumonia immunization records. This affected two residents (Resident #88 and Resident #361) out of five residents reviewed for accurate immunization documentation. The census was 116. 1. Review of Resident #88 medical record revealed Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the admitting diagnosis including dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, depression, anxiety, dysphagia, and weakness. Further review revealed Resident #88 had impaired cognition and impaired hearing. Review of Resident #88 immunization record revealed there was no current influenza vaccine received date or a signed refusal consent by Resident #88 or Power of Attorney (POA) for Resident #88. 2. Review of Resident #361 medical record revealed Resident #361 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the admitting diagnoses including rectal cancer, encephalopathy, weakness, hallucinations, urinary tract infection, and high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide all necessary and reasonable accommodations for a resident with mobility impairments. This affected one (Resident #63) of two residents reviewed for mobility. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were unspecified fracture of left humerus, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, venous insufficiency, chronic kidney disease, unspecified dementia, tremor, anxiety disorder, anemia, osteoarthritis, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hypokalemia, and glaucoma. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not calculated due to her inability to answer the questions, which indicated she had a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment was completed on 04/21/21. Review of Resident #63 medical records revealed she needed the use of a walker for ambulation. She had three falls from 04/18/21 to 05/30/21. After her fall on 05/30/21, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-07 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update and submit new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) screenings when one resident (Resident #82) was diagnosed with additional mental health diagnoses. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure an accurate PASRR screening was completed for one resident (Resident #43). This affected two residents (Residents #43 and #82) out of four residents reviewed for PASRR screenings. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an original admission date on 02/02/15 and a readmission date on 04/24/19 with the following medical diagnoses: presence of cardiac pacemaker, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis (GERD), and chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure upon admission on [DATE]. Additional medical diagnoses: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), weakness, vitamin D deficiency, polyneuropathy, glaucoma, osteoarthritis, history of falling, and presence of automatic (implantable)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a resident fall. This affected one (Resident #63) of two residents reviewed for falls. The census was 100. Findings Include: Medical record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were unspecified fracture of left humerus, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, venous insufficiency, chronic kidney disease, unspecified dementia, tremor, anxiety disorder, anemia, osteoarthritis, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hypokalemia, and glaucoma. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not calculated due to her inability to answer the questions, which indicated she had a severe cognitive impairment. The assessment was completed on 04/21/21. Review of Resident #63 medical records revealed she had falls on 04/18/21, 05/18/21 and 05/30/21. While reviewing the documentation for these falls, the investigations as to the surroundings of the falls was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered without significant medication errors when one resident (Resident #20) was administered an improper dosage of Coumadin (a blood thinning medication) which resulted in a critically high international normalized ratio (INR). This affected one resident (Resident #20) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed the resident had an original admission date on 08/18/19 and a readmission date on 01/04/20 with medical diagnoses including heart failure, essential hypertension, atrial fibrillation, polyneuropathy, weakness, insomnia, lymphedema, polyosteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, unspecified tremor, personal history of urinary tract infections, and presence of cardiac pacemaker. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #20 dated 01/07/21 revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure insulin was discarded appropriately after being opened. This affected three residents (Residents #1, #6 and #79) and had the potential to affect fifteen residents (#1, #6, #13, #15, #20, #35, #42, #50, #52, #55, #59, #60, #79, #294, #347) who receive insulin in the facility. The facility census is 100. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] from 10:30 A.M. of the medication cart on the third floor revealed Resident #79's Novolog injection vial had an opened date of [DATE]. Observation on [DATE] at 10:32 A.M. of the medication cart on the third floor revealed Resident # 1's Novolog injection vial had an opened date of [DATE]. Resident #1's Lantus injection vial was observed with an opened date of [DATE]. Observation on [DATE] at 10:35 A.M. of the medication cart on the third floor revealed Resident #6's insulin Lispo Kwik pen with an opened date of [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 10:44 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-07 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of resident diets, review of dietary spreadsheets, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow the dietary spreadsheet when plain chicken with brown gravy instead of barbeque chicken was served to residents who were prescribed a pureed or mechanical soft diet. This had the potential to affect 26 residents (Residents #2, #3, #4, #9, #10, #12, #13, #16, #26, #27, #31, #33, #34, #35, #43, #47, #50, #51, #54, #57, #62, #65, #75, #83, #86, #92) who received a pureed diet, a mechanical soft diet, or ground/pureed meats. The facility census was 100. Findings Include: Review of the Diet Order Tally Report-All Special Diets, dated 06/01/21, revealed there were 13 residents on a mechanical soft diet (Residents #2, #3, #9, #13, #16, #26, #33, #34, #43, #47, #50, #57, and #62). Two residents (Residents #75 and #83) were on a mechanical soft diet with pureed meat. Eight residents (Residents #4, #12, #27, #35, #51, #54, #86, and #92) were on a pureed diet. Two residents (Residents #10 and #31) were on a regular diet with ground meats.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to CARMELITE SISTERS FOR THE AGED & INFIRM — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.1 | -1.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BANIEWICZ, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2021 |
| BARBE, LEONARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2021 |
| BROWN, DON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/2021 |
| DOMINO, LEDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2021 |
| FERNANDES, EARL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2021 |
| GATHERS, PATRICIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2021 |
| HALEY, MARGARET | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/2021 |
| KASPER, ROSE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/2021 |
| MCNAMARA, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 04/01/2021 |
| PFEFFER, THERESA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/26/2024 |
| SEYMOUR, BERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 04/01/2021 |
| THE CARMELITE SYSTEM INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/19/2001 |
| BROWN, ANN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/14/2004 |
| NDIFE, ANITA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365436. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.