No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Citadel of Northbrook, The

3300 Milwaukee Ave., Northbrook, IL 60062 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 158 certified beds · (847) 795-9700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (847) 795-9700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 20235 actual-harm citations$25,126 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2023
  • it has 5 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (26) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $25,126 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-27)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2180 Pfingsten Rd · (847) 901-5268 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3780 Willow Rd · (847) 326-1201 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
H Mart0.2 mi
3385 Milwaukee Ave · (847) 510-6222 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4887 W Lake Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3020 Milwaukee Ave · (847) 296-5727

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.5%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.6%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.9%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms99.0%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.1%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.0%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.1%18.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.3%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.6%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.0%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%2.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.3%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.3%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.5%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.332.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.162.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 308 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
26.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 26.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 212 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.8%CMS range 53.4–65.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 8.5–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge26.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge21.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.5–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.75
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
32.4%
Total nursing turnover
26.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 133.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-21)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide effective supervision to prevent an avoidable fall for one resident (R1) exhibiting increased confusion/agitation/wandering due to dementia. This affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for fall prevention. This failure resulted in R1 being involved in a fall incident sustaining a right femur fracture. Findings include: R1's medical record notes R1 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, diabetes, unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, and weakness. R1's MDS (minimum data set), dated 3/14/24, notes R1's BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score was 5 out of 15. R1 required partial assistance with bed mobility. R1 required substantial assistance with toileting, transfers, and bathing. Per CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) a BIMS score 0-7 notes severe cognitive impairment. R1's care plan, initiated 3/8/24, notes R1 is at risk for falls related to gangrene left toes, unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe transfer with a full (mechanical) lift per care plan; failed to inform doctor of refusal in using the (mechanical) lift and failed to reassess for safe transfers for 1 (R1) of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for falls. This failure resulted to R1 sliding on the floor sustaining a fracture of the tibia/fibula. Findings include: R1's Facesheet indicates that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Emphysema, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia and Hypercapnia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Nondisplaced Oblique Fracture of the Shaft of Right Tibia, Venous Thrombosis and Embolism, Disorder of the Autonomic Nervous System, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Pulmonary Blastomycosis, Urinary Tract Infection, Neurological Dysfunction of Bladder, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Agoraphobia with Panic Disorder, Other Cord…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-08-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent or identify the origin of how a resident sustained a right hip fracture. This affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for injury of unknown origin. This failure resulted in R1 complaining of pain to the right leg. R1 was assessed, sent to the local hospital, and diagnosed and treated for complex comminuted periprosthetic fracture. Findings include: R1 face sheet shows R1 is [AGE] year-old female, R1 has diagnoses of presence of right artificial hip joint, history of falling, unspecified dementia, lack of coordination. R1 plan of care denotes R1 has difficulty hearing and visual deficits. R1 incident report to the department dated 8/6/2023 denotes in part, location of incident shower room, resident complained of pain on right leg upon assessment, noted right hip swelling and shortening of right leg no bruising or redness noted. NP (Nurse Practitioner) notify and assess resident in order to send resident to hospital for evaluation, resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility has the following failures for 3 out of 6 residents (R6, R25 and R91) for a total sample of 30 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers: Failed to follow their wound prevention and management policy to ensure residents does not develop pressure ulcers. Failed ensure that residents received wound treatments. Failed to follow manufacture's instruction for proper settings on the low air mattress. Failed to maintain correct dressing per physician's order. Failed to monitor skin status for prevention of pressure ulcers. Failed to refer residents with new and worsening pressure ulcers to wound care physician for assessment and treatment. These failures resulted in R6 sustaining 4 new facility acquired pressure ulcers on her right lower extremities. R25 sustaining 2 facility acquired pressure ulcers on the sacral pressure ulcer that further deteriorate with size, characteristic and appearance, and left heel pressure ulcer that was identified on its late…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-01-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide oral nutritional supplement as prescribed by physician. This failure resulted in a significant weight loss (>5% change over a span of 1 month and >10% change over a span of 6-month period) for 1 (R57) of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition in a total sample of 30. Findings include: On 01/17/23 at 12:16 PM, surveyor observed V10 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) feeding R57 in the unit dining room, with R57 eating very slowly with eyes closed and overall poor intake less than 50% of lunch meal. No supplement observed on lunch tray. On 01/18/23 at 08:55 AM, surveyor observed V37 (Restorative Coordinator) feeding R57 in unit dining room. No commercial oral supplement observed on breakfast tray. No commercial oral supplement listed on R57's meal ticket. On 01/18/23 at 9:13 AM, V16 (Speech Language Pathologist) stated that R57 requires 1:1 feeding assistance. On 01/18/23 at 11:25 AM, V19 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) re-weighed R57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide dignity to resident while feeding. This deficiency affects one (R105) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Dignity Findings include: On 02/18/25 at 11:54 AM, R105 observed in dining room. On 02/18/25 at 11:56 AM, V16 (Certified Nurse Aide) observed feeding R105 while standing over resident. V16 said that he is aware that he needs to be sitting down to feed R105, said he had no chair available. On 2/18/25 at 11:59 AM, V15 (Unit Manager) said that all staff feeding residents should be sitting next to resident and not stand over the residents, chairs are available in dinning room. On 02/19/25 at 1:36 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said that staff should provide feeding assistance to resident while sitting next to resident to be at eye level and provide dignity to resident. Hand hygiene to performed before and after. Facility's policy on Assistance with Meals revised July 2017 Policy: Resident shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement its policy on resident self-administration by failure to perform an assessment conducted by IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) to determine safe self-medication administration of resident. The facility failed to obtained physician order for resident self-medication administration. The facility failed to ensure storage of medication in locked box in the resident room. The facility also failed to document, and care planned of resident self-administration of medication. This deficiency affects one (R36) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Resident Self-medication administration. Findings include: On 2/18/25 at 11:46AM, Observed R36 on semi-sitting position in bed with V13 RN (Registered Nurse). R36 is alert and oriented x 3 and can verbalize needs to staff. Observed eye drop medication unlabeled at bedside tray table. She said that it is her eye medication- Refresh eye drops, that she uses every 5 minutes due to severe eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure not to use multilayers of linen over the low air loss mattress as manufacturer recommendation to resident with Stage 4 pressure ulcers. This deficiency affects one (R30) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Wound care management. Findings include: On 2/19/25 at 9:57AM, Observed R30 lying on bed with Low air loss mattress. V19 said R30 has pressure ulcers, and the Wound care nurse does her wound dressings. V19 RN checked the linens over the LAL (Low air loss) mattress. Observed flat sheet and a folded linen in quarters over the mattress. R30 is wearing disposable brief. V19 said that R30 should only be on flat sheet over the LAL mattress. On 2/19/25 at 11:07AM, Informed V3 DON (Director of Nursing) of above observation. She said that resident on LAL mattress should only have flat sheet over the mattress. On 2/20/25 at 10:59AM, Observed R30 has flat sheet and folded linen over the LAL mattress. R30 wears disposable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an ongoing assessment is rendered to identify change in limitation of a resident's left-hand range of motion. This deficiency affects one (R52) of three in a sample of 26 reviewed for Restorative nursing program. Findings include: On 2/18/2025 at 12:30 PM, observed with V5 (Restorative CNA) that R52 has a left-hand flexion contraction with no hand splint applied. V5 said that R52 should have a hand splint applied. On 2/20/2025 at 10:53 AM, V5 said that R52 is in bed mobility program, but she first observed R52's left-hand flexion contraction with the surveyor. V5 said that she notified V14 (LPN) and V9 (Restorative Nurse). On 2/18/2025 at 12:40 PM, showed observation made to V14 (LPN) that R52 has a left-hand flexion contraction. V14 said that R52 should have a splint applied to her left hand. On 2/20/2025 at 10:00 AM, V9 (Restorative Nurse), said that when V9 assessed R52 on 1/17/2025, V9 did not observed any limitation on range of motion (ROM) on R52 left hand. V9 said that decrease in R52's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices during feeding assistance and perform hand hygiene. This deficiency affects two (R30, R67) of three residents in the sample of 26 reviewed for Infection control protocol. Findings include: On 02/18/25 at 12:00 PM, R67 observed in dining area. On 2/18/25 at 12:00 PM, V17 (Registered Nurse) observed feeding R67 and then observed feeding another resident at the same table and no hand hygiene performed in between. V17 said that she knows she has to feed one patient at a time and said that she did not perform hand hygiene after feeding one resident and going to another. On 02/18/25 at 12:09 PM, V15 (Unit Manager) said all staff should perform hand hygiene before and after assisting with feeding resident. Hand sanitizer is available in unit and sink available to wash hands in dinning area for hand hygiene. On 02/19/25 at 1:36 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said expectation of staff when feeding resident is to perform hand hygiene before and after feeding resident and when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders and failed to administer medication in accordance with acceptable clinical practice for 9 (R1, R5, R7, R31, R43, R54, R78, R95, R99) of 9 residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 4/9/24 at 9:54AM V11 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed completing 9:00AM medication administration. After holding one tablet metoprolol 25mg (milligrams) from R45, V11 returned to the medication cart, and placed the tablet back in the medication blister pack with unclean hands. V11 said, it was okay to return the medication because it did not fall on the floor. Surveyor observed V11 touch the medication with V11's bare hands and brought into the resident's room. The medication fell out of the medication cup and onto the tray. At the conclusion of the observation V11 said, although they had passed medications to all their residents, they did not sign out all the medications as given on the MAR (Medication Administration Record). Surveyor observed on the Electronic Health…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to have a five percent (5%) or less medication error rate for one (R45) of one resident. There were 13 medication errors out of 34 medication opportunities, resulting in a 38.24% medication error rate. Findings include: On 04/09/24 at 09:14 AM V11 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed administering 9:00AM medications to R45. When administering to R45, V11 said R45 takes medications whole, individually and in applesauce. R45 said R45 only wanted one pill prior to V11 administering, which V11 acknowledged. V11 administered medications by spoon and two pills were observed in the applesauce. R45 spit one small yellow pill out and nurse gathered with tissue, not questioning or re-offering. After observing administration, V11 was about to throw out the tissue when surveyor asked to identify the tablet. V11 said V11 didn't know what the tablet was, but then recognized it as digoxin against the medication card. V11 said this is a heart medication. Administered medications for R45 were reconciled against the current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow hand hygiene procedures during medication administration for two (R23 and R45) residents reviewed for infection control. Findings include: On 4/9/24 at 9:14AM, V11 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) was observed preparing and administering medications. During this observation, V11 did not perform hand hygiene at the beginning of the observation. Surveyor observed V11 remove tablets from medication blister cards popping the medications in V11's hand and placed them in a medication cups. As V11 moved across the cart, touching cards and common surfaces, V11 did not stop to perform hand hygiene. V11 continued this practice for two different residents R23 and R45. Facility Policy titled Medication Administration (Pharmacy) revised 10/2014 states in part: Preparation: 2. Handwashing and Hand Sanitization: The person administering medications adheres to good hand hygiene, which includes washing hands thoroughly before beginning a medication pass, prior to handling any medication, after coming into direct contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions. This has the potential to affect all 141 residents that receive nutrition services from the kitchen. Findings include: On 01/17/2023 at 09:16 AM, surveyor conducted an initial tour of the kitchen with V26 (Dietary Manager). At 09:24 AM, surveyor inspected facility's walk-in refrigerator that also leads into the freezer. Surveyor observed a cart full of individual whoopie pies and puddings uncovered in the middle of the refrigerator. V26 stated kitchen staff prepared them in the morning and facility will serve them for lunch. In the freezer, surveyor observed ice build-up at the bottom of the freezer's left fan. There was a box of breakfast sausage underneath the fan. The box had a build-up of ice on the top left side. V26 stated the freezer is supposed to go through a weekly defrost cycle. On 01/18/2023 at 09:00 AM, surveyor conducted a follow-up kitchen tour. Surveyor observed the facility's knife holder that was fastened on the wall. Knife holder had dust and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents' call light cords were within reach for 4 (R15, R82, R128, R239) out of a total sample of 30 residents. Findings include: On 01/17/2023 at 12:22 PM, surveyor entered R128's room for interview. R128 asked surveyor for more soup. Informed R128 of surveyor's roles. R128 stated [R128] doesn't know how to call staff. R128 began feeling around the bed. Surveyor noted R128's call light cord was on the floor near the head of the bed frame. R128 stated I can't reach it all the way back there. I want to call for more soup. I have nothing to call if I want something. R128 stated [R128] was feeling frustrated. At 12:33 PM, surveyor attempted to flag/call someone down the hallway. Could not reach staff. Surveyor went to nurses' station. V25 (Certified Nurse Aide/CNA) stated V25 was assigned to R128. V25 entered R128's room. V25 stated R128's call light cord was on the floor out of reach for R128. On 01/18/2023 at 03:10 PM, surveyor reviewed R128's comprehensive care plan. Focus created 1/17/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 11 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standard in providing pharmaceutical services as to timely administering medication scheduled as per policy and procedure for residents (R105, R118, R93, R87, R77, R26, R82, R24, R44, R29, R67, R57, R112, R134, R56). And failed to follow professional standard for licensed staff permitted to administer medication by not following physician's order in giving the right dose of insulin for 1 resident (R118). These failures have the potential to affect 15 residents (R105, R118, R93, R87, R77, R26, R82, R24, R44, R29, R67, R57, R112, R134, R56) not receiving medications needed on time, and one resident (R118) not receiving correct dose of insulin. Findings include: On 01/17/2023 at 10:58 AM, V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was still passing medication for R105 and R118. After V30 prepared medications for R118, V30 said that R118 often refused medication. V30 tried to give R118 medication but refused to take all his (R118) medicines. V30 was asked what time schedule of medicine R118 and R105…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date oxygen tubing for 5 (R94, R111, R127, R128, R238) residents reviewed for oxygen therapy out of a total sample of 30. Findings include: On 01/17/2023 at 12:51 PM, surveyor was in R127's room for interview. Surveyor observed R127 on oxygen via nasal cannula. No label or date on the nasal cannula. On 01/18/2023 at 02:49 PM, surveyor reviewed R127's care plan. Focus created 12/06/2022 documents in part that R127 has altered respiratory function secondary to congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and emphysema. Intervention created 12/06/2022 documents in part: Change oxygen bubbler and tubing weekly on Sunday and date and initial bubbler and tubing. On 01/17/2023 at 12:24 PM, surveyor was in R128's room for interview. Surveyor observed R128 on oxygen via nasal cannula. No label or date on the nasal cannula. On 01/18/2023 at 03:01 PM, surveyor reviewed R128's care plan. Focus created 01/17/2023 documents in part that R128 has altered respiratory function. Intervention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medication scheduled as per policy and procedure for residents (R105, R118, R93, R87, R77, R26, R82, R24, R44, R29, R67, R57, R112, R134, R56); failed to follow physician's order in giving the right dose of insulin for 1 resident (R118) and failed to ensure medication was not left at the bed side of one (R31) resident. These failures have the potential to affect 15 residents (R105, R118, R93, R87, R77, R26, R82, R24, R44, R29, R67, R57, R112, R134, R56) not receiving medications needed on time, 1 resident (R118) not receiving the correct dose of insulin and ensuring 1 resident's medication is accessible only by those licensed or permitted to prepare and administer medications. Findings include: On 01/17/2023 at 10:58 AM. V30 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was still passing medication for R105 and R118. After V30 prepared medications for R118, V30 said that R118 often refused medication. V30 tried to give R118 medication but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to date insulin with open and expiration date for 4 residents (R79, R138, R32, R139). Failed to date eye drops with open and expiration date for 2 residents (R128, R17). Failed to maintain medication cart free from discontinued medication for 1 resident (R111). These failures have the potential to affect 7 (R79, R138, R32, R139, R128, R17, R111) residents in receiving quality medications. Findings include: [DATE] at 09:20 AM. With V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) during medication review, administered 55 units of Insulin Degludec to R139. Upon review of insulin vial, no date was seen. And printed instructions that reads: Discard after 42 days after opening. On [DATE] at 12:47 PM, With V14 (Registered Nurse/RN), the medication cart was reviewed. When asked about insulin medication on the cart. V14 presented only 1 insulin pen and said, Yes, this is the only insulin I have in my cart. V14 was asked to accompany and provide entry to medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to a.) implement infection control measures for the disposal and containing of used isolation PPE (Personal Protective Equipment), garbage and linen in a designated container inside the resident rooms for 4 (R55, R86, R114, R128) of 10 (R22, R23, R60, R91, R104, R138) residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions, b.) ensure Infection Control policies and procedures were reviewed and revised annually to reflect current standards of practice, c.) perform hand hygiene before performing medication administration after touching high touched area for 1 resident (R6) and d.) failed to store inhalers by covering the mouthpiece to maintain clean area when used by mouth for 1 resident (R96). Findings Include: R55 has diagnoses not limited to COVID-19 (Coronavirus), Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Pulmonary Embolism, Dementia, Schizoaffective Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety Disorder and Dysphagia. R55 Order Summary Report document in part: Contact/Droplet Isolation due to COVID + (Positive) for 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was revised related to the discontinuation of the use of splints for 1 (R76) resident in a sample of 30 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings Include: R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to Contracture, Right Elbow, Contracture, Right Hand, Contracture, Right Knee, Low Back Pain, Functional Quadriplegia, Cord Compression, Spondylosis with Myelopathy, Cervical Region, Fusion of Spine, Cervical Region, Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Region, Major Depressive Disorder and Disorders of Muscle. R76 MDS (Minimum Data Set) Section C Cognitive Patterns BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 08 indicating moderately impaired. Order Summary Report dated 01/18/23 document in part: Right elbow, right hand, right knee splints to be on after breakfast and off before lunch daily as tolerated. Order date: 11/16/21. Order status: Discontinued. Apply Right Elbow Extension brace and Right-Hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent further decline in range of motion for one (R76) resident reviewed for contractures in a sample of 30. Findings include: R76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to Contracture, Right Elbow, Contracture, Right Hand, Contracture, Right Knee, Low Back Pain, Functional Quadriplegia, Cord Compression, Spondylosis with Myelopathy, Cervical Region, Fusion of Spine, Cervical Region, Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Region, Major Depressive Disorder and Disorders of Muscle. R76 MDS (Minimum Data Set) Section C Cognitive Patterns BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 08 indicating moderately impaired. Order Summary Report dated 01/18/23 document in part: Right elbow, right hand, right knee splints to be on after breakfast and off before lunch daily as tolerated. Order date: 11/16/21. Order status: Discontinued. Apply Right Elbow Extension brace and Right-Hand roll resting splint daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their enteral tube feeding via pump policy to ensure 2 (R31, R91) of 6 (R6, R42, R108, R118) residents enteral nutrition bottles were labeled before administration in a sample of 30 reviewed for enteral tube feeding. Findings include, On 1/17/23 at 11:21 AM, observed R91's enteral gastric feeding bottle half-filled and water bag was mapped through the pump without R91's information on the blank labels. On 1/17/23 at 11: 38 AM, observed R31's enteral gastric feeding bottle one -fourth filled and water bag was mapped through the pump without R31's information on the blank labels. On 1/17/23 at 11:46 AM, V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated, I worked here for 1 year, but have been a nurse for 2 years. Upon starting the gastric tube feeding, that nurse was supposed to label the feeding formula bottle and water bag with the resident's information: name, date, time, rate, and type of formula. Usually, the evening nurse starts the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their Intravenous Policy to ensure one (R91) of 5 (R98, R110, R139, R239) residents midline dressing was changed, in a sample of 30 reviewed for intravenous access. Findings include, On 1/17/23 at 11:20 AM, observed R91 lying in bed resting with a midline in his upper right extremity. The midline dressing dated 1/9/23 and was halfway lifted up from R91's skin, with a dark brown substance on the bandage. On 1/17/23 at 11:28 AM, V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated, I am R91's nurse today. I've been working here for 1year. R91's midline dressing should be changed weekly and as need. The dressing is half off with the date of 1/9/23, the night nurse should have changed the dressing when she gave R91's antibiotic. I did not assess R91's midline dressing because his intravenous antibiotic is not due until later today. On 1/19/23 at 12:15 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated, All intravenous access such as midlines or PICC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-20 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide physician services for residents with new and worsening pressure ulcers for 3 out of 6 residents (R6, R25 and R91) for a total sample of 30 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. These failures have the potential to affect 3 residents (R6, R25 and R91) from needed medical care that wound physician can provide. Findings include: The following residents have new or worsening pressure ulcers: R6 sustained 4 new facility acquired pressure ulcers on her right lower extremities on 01/09/2023. Pressure ulcers were not seen by V33 (Wound Care Physician) until facility was notified that those 4 pressure ulcers are being reviewed. R25 sustained 2 facility acquired pressure ulcers on the sacral area on 09/12/2023 as redness with skin intact, then skin opened on 09/30/2023 that further deteriorate with size, characteristic and appearance. And left heel pressure ulcer that was identified on its late stage (Stage 3) on 01/03/2023. V33 saw R25 the first time on 01/16/2023 when both wounds deteriorated. R91 sustained…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-21 · tag F0575 — pattern
    Post a list of names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all pertinent State agencies and advocacy groups and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the State Survey Agency.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post [NAME] program information that is in an accessible and visible location to the resident in the facility. This deficiency affects 77 residents eligible for [NAME] Program. Findings include: On 2/18/25 at 10:39AM, V1 Administrator said that they have 3 residents enrolled in the [NAME] Program. V1 said that [NAME] program information is posted in all 3 units. V1 said that social services are responsible for the [NAME] program, but she is responsible to ensuring that [NAME] program information are posted in all units, visible to all residents. Rounds made with V1 to look for [NAME] Program posting. No posting found in the front desk/front lobby. No posting was found in the Medbridge and Arcadia unit (first floor). Posting was found by the nursing station of Brookview unit (2nd floor). On 2/19/25 at 10:00AM, V1 Administrator said that there are 77 residents out of 132 residents in the facility that are eligible for [NAME] program.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$25,126 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-01-27
  • $15,093 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CITADEL HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GRAF, MARCELLAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 12/28/2018

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 37%Medicare 13%Other / private 50%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$365per resident / day
operating cost
$11,084per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$350per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145982. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next