Citadel At Casa Scalabrini

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 291 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 182 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 58% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 229 beds and averages 176.8 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 52 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.87 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that therapy recommendations for hands-on transfers were followed to prevent a resident from falling. This failure resulted in R132 falling and sustaining a fracture of the left fibula. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R132) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 35. Findings include: R132's electronic medical record showed R132 is an [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that include cerebral infarction, repeated falls, malignant neoplasm of endometrium and uterus, unilateral primary osteoarthritis of the left knee, aphasia, and apraxia following cerebral infarction. R132's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed R132 to be severely cognitively impaired and required partial/moderate assistance for transfers and ambulation. On March 18, 2025 at 11:03 AM, R132 was observed sitting in a wheelchair with a left leg orthotic boot on. R132 stated she fell, but was unable to describe what happened. R132 progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow sanitary practices in the facility kitchen. This applies to 172 residents that received foods prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: Facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 671 dated March 18, 2025 showed that the facility census was 176 residents. Facility provided information that there were 4 residents on NPO (nothing by mouth) status. On March 18, 2025 at 9:11 AM, during initial tour of the kitchen in the presence of V5 (Dietary Manager) the following observations were made: In the dry storage area, 2 dented cans at the seams were stored on horizontal shelving along with other cans. These cans were labeled Traditional Refried Beans (7 lbs/pounds) and Vegetarian Baked Beans (7 lbs, 3 oz/ounces). In a walk-in Cooler, there were also multiple cans stored on a slanted shelving and also showed a dented can labeled Sauerkraut (6 lbs, 8 oz). V5 stated that the dented cans in both the dry storage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their Water Management Plan for Legionella. The facility also failed to follow their policy for EBP (Enhance Barrier Precautions). This applies to all 176 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated March 18, 2025, showed the facility's census was 176 residents. On March 19, 2025, at 10:31 AM, V15 (Maintenance Director) said for the facility's Water Management Plan for Legionella, V15 tests the facility's water temperature in resident rooms and shower rooms. V15 continued to say the water temperatures in the kitchen and laundry are tested daily. V15 said the maintenance department does not test the water for chlorine levels. On March 19, 2025, at 10: 38 AM, V14 (Regional Maintenance Director) said a water company comes to the facility about every month and tests the water for chemicals. V14 said that is the only chemical tests performed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene and grooming. This applies to 6 of 7 residents (R6, R18, R24, R77, R106 and 139) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. R18 had multiple diagnoses including incomplete paraplegia, based on the Face sheet. R18's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated March 13, 2025 showed that the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and had functional limitation in range of motion to both upper extremities. The same MDS showed that R18 required total assistance from the staff with personal hygiene. On March 18, 2025 at 11:42 AM, R18 was in bed, alert and oriented. R18's fingernails were long and with brown substances under the nails. R18 stated that she needs the assistance of the staff to cut/trim and clean her fingernails. On March 19, 2025 at 9:16 AM, R18 was in bed, alert and oriented. R18's fingernails were long and with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide gravy for mechanical soft diets and failed to provide the vegetable option as starter for the mechanical soft and pureed diets. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R35, R52, R80, R90, R91, R93, R94, R103, R116, R136) reviewed for dining in the sample of 35. Findings include: Facility daily spread sheet for Week 3 Tuesday included Garden Fresh Lettuce and Tomato Salad (1 cup) as a starter for General diets, soft cooked hot vegetable for Mechanical soft diets and pureed cooked hot vegetables for Pureed diets. The same spread sheet also included Tender Pork Roast as the main entrée and showed to serve ground pork roast with 1 oz/ounce gravy for Mechanical soft diets. Additionally the lunch meal also included carrots and lemon herb potatoes. On March 18, 2025 at 11:20 AM during lunch tray line service, R35, R80, R91, R116, R136 who were on mechanical soft diets and R52, R90, R93, R94, R103 who were on pureed diets did not receive the soft cooked hot vegetables and pureed cooked hot vegetables respectively…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0847 — pattern
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include in their arbitration agreement the required language indicating that signing the Arbitration Agreement was not a condition for their admission to the facility. This applies to 51 of 176 residents (R14, R16, R23, R29, R30, R36, R39, R40, R41, R46, R50, R52, R55, R56, R58, R59, R62, R89, R101, R112, R121, R123, R126, R129, R133, R136, R138, R140, R141, R148, R153, R154, R157, R158, R160, R161, R162, R163, R164, R165, R167, R169, R171, R172, R173, R174, R329, R330, R331, R332 and R334) residing in the facility reviewed for Arbitration Agreement. Findings include: On March 18, 2025, at 4:55 PM, V2 (Assistant Administrator) stated that all residents admitted to the facility are offered arbitration. It is up to the resident or their responsible party to sign the agreement. Currently out of 176 in-house residents, 51 residents/responsible party had signed the arbitration agreement. V2 stated they have the right to decline because signing this…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for a resident to address swelling to hand and failed to assess a resident to assist in positioning of his thumb digit. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R86, R100) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. R86's face sheet included diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site, aphasia following cerebral infarction. R86's POS (Physician Order Sheet) showed to apply ace bandage to right hand in the morning, remove at bedtime one time a day for swelling and remove per schedule (revised date September 19, 2024). On March 18, 2025 at 10:13 AM, R86's right hand appeared contracted with fingers closed in a fist. R86 did not have any bandages on her right hand. R86 stated that she is unable to open her fingers, and remarked It hurts. R86 did not have any ace bandage on her right hand during intermittent observations until lunch meal service at 1:05 PM on the same…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess and provide splints and devices to residents, to maintain and prevent further reduction in ROM (range of motion). This applies to 2 of 8 residents (R126 and R139) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 35. Findings include: 1. R126 had multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side. R126's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed that the resident was cognitively intact. The same MDS showed that R126 had functional limitation in range of motion to one side of his upper extremity. On March 18, 2025 at 11:07 AM, R126 was sitting in his wheelchair inside the unit dining room. R126 was alert, oriented and verbally responsive. R126's left hand was positioned on his lap. R126 cannot move his left arm and hand, and he was not able to open/extend his left hand fingers without the assistance of his right hand. R126 had no device or splint on his left arm and/or left…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-01-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to remove lint from the facility's clothes dryers. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility, staff, and visitors. Findings include: The facility's 1/2/24 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Form 671 form showed a resident census of 156 residents. On 1/4/24 at 9:46am, all the facility's five dryers were observed not in use and with lint in the lint basket/catchers. The baskets all had lint on the sides and bottom of the baskets, and the lint in each basket was about ½ inch thick. On 1/04/24 at 9:46am, V9 (Laundry Staff) said that she did not remember if she had cleaned out the dryers today or not. V9 said that she does not log it when she cleans out the lint baskets and she did not know how often she should clean the lint out- maybe once a day or a few times a day. At 9:52 am, V10 (Laundry Supervisor) verified there was lint in all five dryers and the staff are not logging when they clean out the lint traps and they are supposed to. V10 said she did not know that the lint…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-01-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's buttocks were not exposed, provide dignified care while feeding the residents and failed to remove resident's urinal during mealtime. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R85, R5, R91 and R113) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 32. Findings include: 1. On 1/3/24 at 12:45 PM, R85 was sitting along with many other residents in the dining room for lunch with his buttocks fully exposed. On 1/3/24 at 12:50 PM, V5 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) stated that leaving R85 exposed like that violates his dignity. On 1/3/24 at 3:00 PM, V4 (RN-Registered Nurse) stated, residents must be well groomed and the clothing they wear should cover their body appropriately to maintain their dignity. Facility policy on 'Quality of life - Dignity' dated 1/2024 showed, ' . A. Residents shall be treated with dignity and respect at all times .' 2. On 1/2/24 at 1:02 PM, R91 was observed in her room in bed, with the head of the bed elevated about…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have call lights accessible to dependent residents. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R26) reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 32. The findings include: On 01/02/2024 at 11:44 AM, R26 was in his room, lying on bed. The room's right window was open. The room felt cold. R26's call light was on the floor on the right side of the bed. R26 said he was transferred from his previous room to his current room at 10:30 AM on 01/02/2024. R26 said he has been looking for his call light since his transfer because the room was too cold. He said he was upset because his old room had everything he needed, and his new room did not even have a call light. He said he has been calling out for help but nobody came to his room. On 01/04/2024 at 11:44 AM, V3 (DON-Director of Nursing) said after a resident transfers room, she expects staff to orient resident to set up of new room and make sure call light is within reach. She said call light should always be within reach for safety purposes. Facility's Policy on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CITADEL HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL