No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hopewell Grove Rehabilitation and Healthcare

60 Marietta Road, Chillicothe, OH 45601 · For profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (740) 772-5900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation$134,320 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $134,320 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-26)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
869 N Bridge St · (740) 571-0300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.1 mi
850 N Bridge St · (740) 779-2905 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.2 mi
887 N Bridge St · (740) 773-2901 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.5%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms29.3%30.1%6.5%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.3%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication29.4%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.5%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.6%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.2%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.9%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine56.5%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.0%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.6%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.621.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.701.801.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
49.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.20hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 49.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.7%CMS range 45.9–66.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 8.0–15.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge49.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge93.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 4.7–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.91
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.25
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.28
RN hoursweekends
46.4%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 75.9 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.25 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-23)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, wound nurse practi-tioner interview, review of wound notes, hospital records, wound clinic records, review of the information from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), and policy re-view, the facility failed to ensure the physician ordered treatments were completed as di-rected and failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent the development of, worsening of and promote the healing of avoidable facility acquired stage IV and un-stageable pressure ulcers with the development of osteomyelitis (a serious infection and inflammation of the bone or bone marrow, typically caused by bacteria (most commonly Staphylococcus aureus) or fungi. It occurs when infections spread from nearby tissue, open wounds, or the bloodstream, causing symptoms like localized bone pain, swelling, fever, and redness) for Resident #72. Resident #72 was at risk for pressure ulcer [NAME]-opment and dependent on staff for activities of daily living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess, develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized prevention program to prevent the development of avoidable pressure ulcers, ensure pressure ulcer dressings were provided as ordered and/or prevent the risk of pressure ulcer infection for Resident #43 and #49. Actual harm occurred on 02/05/25 when Resident #43 was readmitted to the facility following an acute care hospital stay, was determined to be at high risk for skin breakdown, dependent on staff for bed mobility and with known pressure ulcers that were found not to have a comprehensive assessment of the known pressure ulcers upon readmission to the facility. Additionally, the resident's physician ordered treatments for pressure ulcers that were not provided as ordered. Furthermore, the resident was sent to the local acute care hospital on [DATE] following a physical examination of stage IV (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital progress notes, staff interview, observation, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident received medication timely and as ordered by the physician. Actual Harm occurred when the facility failed to administer two scheduled doses of Suboxone (a medication used for opioid withdrawal) resulting in Resident #52 experiencing nausea, diaphoresis (sweating), and discomfort and resulted in the resident being transported to the hospital and admitted for opioid withdrawal symptoms. This affected one (Resident #52) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 72 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including a history of intravenous (IV) drug use. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #52 revealed an order dated 09/12/24 for eight milligrams (mg) of Suboxone every twelve hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing in the facility who were identified as eating food prepared in the facility kitchen. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Observation on 02/09/26 at 6:34 P.M. revealed a large amount of flour was lying in the bottom of a plastic bin located on the second shelf inside the dry storage room. Three bags of open corn flakes were lying on a shelf and did not contain a date they had been opened. Soft taco shells were being stored inside plastic storage bags and were not labeled with a date opened. Interview with Dietary Employee #1201 at the time of the observation confirmed all opened foods were to labeled with the date opened and confirmed the plastic bin with flour in the bottom of it needed to be cleaned out. Observation inside the walk-in refrigerator on 02/09/26 revealed a large bag of shredded mozzarella cheese was lying on the shelf. The bag had been opened at the top corner and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement and maintain a comprehensive Quality Assurance Improvement Program (QAPI) program and plan to address care issues and/or concerns in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of the Quality Assurance (QA) committee attendance records for the previous eight months revealed QA meetings were held every month. Review of falls, pressure ulcers for residents that are healing, not healing, present on admission and or are in-house acquired, antibiotic use and weight loss are some of the areas discussed.The findings for the annual survey, dated 02/09/26 revealed noncompliance in the area of pressure ulcer care, which included prevention and treatments, resulting in substandard quality of care with an Immediate Jeopardy beginning on 08/27/25 for Resident #72 and an Actual Harm, beginning on 01/12/26 for Resident #6.Interview on 02/19/26 at 10:00 A.M. with the Administrator revealed the QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure insulin and eye drops were labeled with the date opened and failed to ensure insulin glargine was discarded timely after being opened. This affected six residents (#9, #10, #24, #47, #55 and #60) whose medications were observed during the medication storage task. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Record review for Resident #9 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included senile degeneration of the brain, type two diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the physicians order for Resident #9, dated 01/14/26, revealed 10 units of insulin glargine was to be administered subcutaneously at bedtime related to type two diabetes mellitus. Record review for Resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, and subluxation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record reviews, review of hospital discharge records, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure advance directives were ordered and implemented timely upon admission or readmission to the facility. This affected two residents (#72 and #92) out of the two residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #92 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included hypertensive emergency, acute pulmonary edema, and Sjorgen syndrome. Review of the hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], revealed the resident code status was Do Not Resuscitate - Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA). Review of the physician orders for Resident #92 revealed an order for advance directives had not been initiated until 02/10/26 and listed the resident as Full Code status. Review of the DNRCCA paperwork, signed by the physician on 02/05/26, revealed the paperwork was uploaded into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation to ensure a safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility and ensure the discharge planning process addressed each residents discharge goals and needs. This affected two residents (#4, #32) of three residents reviewed for transfer or discharge from the facility. The facility census was 74.Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 01/13/26 and diagnoses including alcohol dependence in remission, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of a Minimum Data Set assessment completed 01/19/26 revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 (intact cognition). Review of nursing and physician progress notes from admission through 02/12/26 did not reveal any issues related to alcohol consumption. The plan of care dated 01/19/26 and revised 02/11/26 stated he had a history of substance abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) recommendations were implemented timely and appropriately. This affected the one resident (#10) of one resident who was reviewed for PASARR recommendations. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Record review for Resident #10 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, personality disorder, anxiety disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/01/25, revealed the resident was assessed to have mildly impaired cognition. Review of the Notice of PASRR Level II Outcome, dated 08/25/25, revealed recommendations for 1:1 staffing due to a history of head banging and fire starting, self-injurious items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to document non pressure areas upon admission and initiate treatments for Residents #6, #22, #34. The facility also failed to ensure new and/or ongoing non pressure areas treatments were accurate. This affected Resident #2 and Resident #6. This affected four residents (#2, #6, #22, and #34) of the six residents reviewed for non-pressure skin alterations. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2, revealed an admission date of 02/07/26 Diagnoses included but were not limited to other reduced mobility, need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness and unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition . Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed in progress at the time of this survey. Review of the plan of care dated 02/10/26 for Resident #2 revealed at risk for impaired skin integrity related to poor nutritional intake and confined to bed all or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the smoking policy was implemented to ensure the environment was free from hazards, and failed to implement assistive devices to prevent falls. This affected two residents (#39, #41) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. The facility identified 15 residents as smokers, including Resident #39. Nine of the residents were identified as independent with smoking and six were identified as supervised with smoking. Resident #39 was identified as an independent smoker. Review of the record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 08/19/25 and diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident with hemiplegia and hemiparesis, diabetes, and hypertension. A Minimum Data Set assessment completed 01/19/26 documented a brief interview for mental status score of 15 (intact cognition). A smoking evaluation conducted 11/26/25 and 02/10/26 stated the resident may smoke…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the antibiotic stewardship policy to ensure antibiotics were prescribed appropriately. This affected three of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use (Residents #2, #5, and #33). The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 08/26/25 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the urethra, chronic kidney disease, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. The resident had an indwelling catheter. Review of physician progress notes on 02/11/26 revealed the resident was transferred to the emergency room this morning after her catheter was found dislodged in her bed with the balloon still inflated. She reports that the catheter was likely accidentally pulled out. The facility staff are not permitted to replace the catheter due to her cancer diagnosis, so she went to the emergency room for replacement. The catheter was successfully replaced. A urinalysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staffing to meet residents needs. This affected two (Resident #50 and #72) residents and had the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. The census was 67. Finding Include: 1. On 02/11/25 at 11:15 A.M., observation of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #168 administer Resident #50 morning medication due at 6:00 A.M. via his peg-tube revealed the resident's medication was being administered late. On 02/11/25 at 11:30 A.M., interview with LPN #168 confirmed Resident #50's morning medication was administered outside of the allotted timeframe. LPN #168 revealed the the facility only had three nurses on duty so she had half of another hallway and had three residents who she had to administer morning medications yet. 2. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #72 revealed an initial admission date of 01/24/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner. This affected three residents (#43, #48, #49) of three residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 67. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 01/22/25 with the latest readmission of 02/05/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cellulitis of right lower limb, pressure induced deep tissue damage of sacral region sacral region, hypertension, neurogenic bowel, benign prostatic hyperplasia neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anemia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, retention of urine, edema, pain, Rhabdomyolysis, insomnia, spondylosis lumbar region, obesity, colostomy status and polyneuropathy. Review of the resident's admission evaluation dated 01/22/25 revealed the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident's (#43) bed accommodated his size and had physician ordered enabler bars to enhance bed mobility. This affected one (Resident #43) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 67. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 01/22/25 with the latest readmission of 02/05/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cellulitis of right lower limb, pressure induced deep tissue damage of sacral region sacral region, hypertension, neurogenic bowel, benign prostatic hyperplasia neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anemia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, retention of urine, edema, pain, Rhabdomyolysis, insomnia, spondylosis lumbar region, obesity, colostomy status and polyneuropathy. Review of the resident's monthly physician orders for February 2024 identified an order dated 01/23/25 enabler bars to enhance bed mobility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive admission assessment on admission for two residents (#43, #49). This affected two (Resident #43 and #49) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 67. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 01/22/25 with the latest readmission of 02/05/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cellulitis of right lower limb, pressure induced deep tissue damage of sacral region sacral region, hypertension, neurogenic bowel, benign prostatic hyperplasia neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anemia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, retention of urine, edema, pain, Rhabdomyolysis, insomnia, spondylosis lumbar region, obesity, colostomy status and polyneuropathy. Review of the progress note dated 02/05/25 at 6:10 P.M. revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility at 6:00 P.M. Review of the medical record revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#72) who was dependent on staff received routine bathing. This affected one (Resident #72) of three residents reviewed for bathing. The facility census was 67. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #72 revealed an initial admission date of 01/24/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe protein calorie malnutrition, right bundle branch block, urinary tract infection, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, dysphagia, other disorders of lung, history of falling, pain, slow transit constipation, migraine, vitamin D deficiency, intervertebral disc displacement lumbar region, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, slurred speech, osteoarthritis, dependence on supplemental oxygen, anxiety disorder and functional quadriplegia. The resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter was changed as physician ordered for Resident #43. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#73) received routine indwelling catheter care. This affected two (Resident #43 and #73) of three residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter. The facility census was 67. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 01/22/25 with the latest readmission of 02/05/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cellulitis of right lower limb, pressure induced deep tissue damage of sacral region sacral region, hypertension, neurogenic bowel, benign prostatic hyperplasia neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anemia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, retention of urine, edema, pain, Rhabdomyolysis, insomnia, spondylosis lumbar region, obesity,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain two residents (#50, #72) enteral feeding tube in proper working order. This affected two (Resident #50 and #72) of three residents reviewed for enteral feedings. The facility census was 67. Findings Include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #72 revealed an initial admission date of 01/24/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe protein calorie malnutrition, right bundle branch block, urinary tract infection, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, dysphagia, other disorders of lung, history of falling, pain, slow transit constipation, migraine, vitamin D deficiency, intervertebral disc displacement lumbar region, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, slurred speech, osteoarthritis, dependence on supplemental oxygen, anxiety disorder and functional quadriplegia. The resident was discharged to another local skilled nursing facility (SNF) on 02/07/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#72) was provided the physician ordered chest vest (help clear patients ' airways. It dislodges mucus from the bronchial walls, and helps move secretions and mucus from smaller to larger airways, where it can be coughed or suctioned out.) for chest physiotherapy. This affected one (Resident #72) of one resident reviewed for chest vest use. The facility census was 67. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #72 revealed an initial admission date of 01/24/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), severe protein calorie malnutrition, right bundle branch block, urinary tract infection, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, dysphagia, other disorders of lung, history of falling, pain, slow transit constipation, migraine, vitamin D deficiency, intervertebral disc displacement lumbar region, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate record for one resident (#43) in the area of physician ordered treatments. This affected one (Resident #43) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 67. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 01/22/25 with the latest readmission of 02/05/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cellulitis of right lower limb, pressure induced deep tissue damage of sacral region sacral region, hypertension, neurogenic bowel, benign prostatic hyperplasia neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anemia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, retention of urine, edema, pain, Rhabdomyolysis, insomnia, spondylosis lumbar region, obesity, colostomy status and polyneuropathy. Review of the medical record revealed a comprehensive readmission assessment was not completed until 02/07/25. Further review revealed the assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the potential spread of infection during pressure ulcer dressing change for one resident (#43). Additionally, the facility failed to implement enhance barrier precautions for one resident (#50) with an indwelling medical device. This affected one resident (#43) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and one resident (#50) of three residents reviewed for enteral feeding tubes. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 01/22/25 with the latest readmission of 02/05/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cellulitis of right lower limb, pressure induced deep tissue damage of sacral region sacral region, hypertension, neurogenic bowel, benign prostatic hyperplasia neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, anemia, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, osteoarthritis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, retention…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff and Hospice Director Physician #100 interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain medication order was transcribed correctly resulting in medication errors. This affected one (Resident #64) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Record review of Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 10/27/24. Resident #64 passed away in the facility on hospice care on 12/17/24. The resident had pertinent diagnoses of cerebral palsy and reflux uropathy. Review of the 08/22/24 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. The resident required substantial to maximum assistance for personal hygiene, rolling left to right, sit to lying, lying to sitting, and sit to stand. The resident had an indwelling catheter and was occasionally incontinent of bowel. Resident #64 was admitted to hospice services on 12/15/24 with a diagnosis of sepsis. Review of the 12/16/24 Hospice Client Medication Report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, observation, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with a wound. This affected one (Resident #37) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Record review of Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 11/23/24 with a discharge 12/02/24 and readmission on [DATE]. The resident had pertinent diagnoses of cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparessis following cerebrovascular disease affecting right non dominant side, type two diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the 11/27/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #37 is cognitively intact. The resident has an unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of the 01/09/25 wound evaluation revealed the resident had a stage two pressure ulcer on his left heel. Observation of Resident #37 on 01/14/25 at 2:14 P.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #20 performing wound care. RN #20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure toileting assistance was provided in a timely manner to a dependent resident. This affected one (Resident #57) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. The facility census was 72 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 08/28/24 with diagnoses including dementia, need for assistance with personal care, and difficulty walking. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #57 dated 09/04/24 revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, was dependent upon staff for transfers to the toilet, and was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan for Resident #57 dated 08/28/24 revealed the resident had a self-care deficit related to impaired physical functioning and medical conditions as evidenced by the need for staff assistance for adequate completion of ADLs. Interventions included staff provide hands-on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, and review of call light audits, the facility failed to provide timely toileting services to dependent residents. This affected one (Resident #24) of three residents reviewed for call light response time. The facility census was 58 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 07/28/24 with diagnoses including orthopedic after care, surgical repair on spine, and hypertension. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #24 dated 08/02/24 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required limited assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Interview on 08/05/24 at 10:00 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed resident call lights should be answered within a reasonable time frame but did not indicate an expectation of minutes within which staff should respond. The Administrator confirmed the facility completed call light audits from 07/23/24 to 07/29/24 as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-23 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely submit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for residents. This affected four (#16, #52, #57, and #61) of six residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/04/23 and a discharge date of 12/21/23. Resident #16 had diagnoses of encephalopathy, schizophrenia, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and retention of urine. Review of Resident #16's MDS assessment on 05/22/24 revealed there was no discharge MDS completed on 12/21/23. Interview on 05/22/24 at 4:23 P.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #40, verified Resident #16 discharged on 12/21/23 and there was not a discharge MDS completed. 2. Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/05/23 and a discharge date of 01/08/24. The resident had pertinent diagnosis of: diverticulitis of intestine, fibromyalgia, acute myocardial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident were placed in enhanced barrier precautions appropriately and failed to ensure staff were wearing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when interacting with residents in enhanced barrier precautions. This affected six (#10, #14, #47, #51, #55, and #376) of six residents the facility identified to be in enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Observations on 05/20/24 between 8:00 A.M. and 8:30 A.M., revealed no residents were identified as requiring enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when care was provided. 1. Observation and interview on 05/20/24 at 8:35 A.M., with Restorative Aide #403 revealed she was doing range of motion exercise with Resident #51 including exercising the upper and lower body and placing hand splints on and off for bilateral upper extremities. Restorative Aide #403 revealed she was not aware of Resident #51's isolation status and if he were in enhanced barrier precautions it was only for staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided assistance in obtaining a resident representative to make appropriate decision on behalf of the resident, concerning exercising resident rights and care and treatment at the faciltiy. This affected one (#56) of one resident reviewed for decision making. Facility census was 61. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 01/22/24. Diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, unsteadiness on feet, generalized weakness, failure to thrive, and malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had significant cognitive impairment. Review progress notes dated 02/08/24, revealed Resident #56 had a significant other at the facility who wanted to take him out of the building. Staff educated Resident#56's girlfriend that Resident #56 was not to be out of the building without family. Progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) and Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident notice letter was accurately completed. This affected three (#41, #66, and #71) of three residents reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of fracture of right femur neck, Parkinson's disease, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, neuropathy, anemia, acute embolism and thrombosis of right femoral vein, hypertension, and osteoporosis. The last covered day of Part A service for Resident #41 was 05/03/24 who then transitioned to long-term care. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident#41 was moderately cognitively impaired, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and had no range of motion impairment in upper and lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical record contained documentation reflecting the reason resident was transferred to the hospital. This affected one (#64) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 03/18/23, with diagnoses of acute metabolic acidosis, sepsis, fatty (change of) liver, post-traumatic stress disorder, personality disorder, ulcerative colitis, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, anxiety disorder, alcohol use with intoxication, major depressive disorder, hypertension, fibromyalgia, and alcoholic liver disease. Resident #64 was discharged from the facility on 05/03/24 to a non-specified location. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was cognitively intact and continent of bowel and bladder. Resident #64 required set up assistance for eating and personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment when they failed to include a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder. This affected one (#25) of six residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/10/23, with diagnoses of: post traumatic stress disorder, iron deficiency anemia, cellulitis of right lower limb, unsteadiness on feet, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the 09/03/23 and 11/08/23 discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments revealed section I (active diagnoses section) was coded with a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Review of the 02/15/24 annual comprehensive MDS assessment revealed the resident had no coded diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder in section I (active diagnoses section). Review of Resident #25's face sheet revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident identifed with the diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder. This affected one (#25) of 19 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/10/23, with diagnoses of: post traumatic stress disorder, iron deficiency anemia, cellulitis of right lower limb, unsteadiness on feet, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the 09/03/23 and 11/08/23 discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments revealed section I (active diagnoses section) was coded with a diagnosis of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) Review of Resident #25's face sheet revealed a diagnoses of post traumatic stress disorder. Review of Resident #25 medical record on 05/22/24 at 3:30 P.M., revealed she did not have a care plan for PTSD. Interview on 05/22/24 at 3:42 P.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated and to include appropriate interventions for elopement for Resident #56 and for nutrition and weight loss prevention for Residents #23 and #51. This affected three (#23, #51, and #56) of 16 residents care plans reviewed. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #56 revealed an admission date of 01/22/24. Diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, unsteadiness on feet, generalized weakness, failure to thrive, and malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #56 had significant cognitive impairment and required assistance for transfers. Review of the plan of care dated 02/08/24 revealed the resident was at risk for elopement due to exit seeking behavior with interventions to monitor battery of wander guard, check wander guard placement, each shift and functionality daily, monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to recognize and timely address severe resident weight loss. This affected one (#27) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 01/19/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, muscle weakness, depression, diabetes, and spinal stenosis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #27 was cognitively intact, was 66 inches tall and weight was 229 pounds (lbs.). Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 was cognitively intact and weighed 193 pounds. The MDS indicated there was no weight loss or gain. Review of the monthly physician orders for January 2024 to May 2024 revealed the resident was to receive a carb-controlled diet with regular texture. Review of Resident #27's weights revealed from 01/19/24 to 03/01/24, Resident #27's weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident drug regimen were free from unnecessary medications when there was not a valid diagnosis for the use of antibiotics. This affected one (#325) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of Resident #325's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/16/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: cerebral infarction and unsteadiness on feet. Review of a physician order dated 05/16/24 revealed take by mouth amoxicillin-potassium clavulanate (an antibiotic) tablet; 875 milligrams (mg)-125 mg; amount: one tablet; oral Administer one tablet by mouth twice daily x 11 days for infection. Review of a physician order dated 05/16/24 revealed take by mouth doxycycline monohydrate (an antibiotic) capsule; 100 mg; amount: one capsule; oral Special Instructions: Administer one capsule by mouth twice daily x 11 days for infection. Review of the medical record on 05/21/24 revealed no documented supporting diagnosis for the antibiotic orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure influenza and pneumonia vaccinations were offered and provided to residents. This affected two (#47 and #56) of five residents reviewed for influenza and pneumonia vaccination. The facility census was 61. Findings include. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 03/22/22. Diagnoses included sepsis, vascular disease, heart failure, diabetes, and Parkinson's. Review of the vaccination consent form dated 09/25/23 revealed he consented for flu but not for pneumonia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was cognitively intact. Review of vaccination preventative health listing revealed Resident #47 had received pneumococcal vaccine on 02/04/21 in an outside setting. Review of the undated vaccination record revealed Resident #47 had received the pneumococcal PPV23 on 02/04/21. Review of the Centers for Disease Control Pneumococcal Vaccine Recommendations revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, family interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to hold care conferences where the resident and resident representatives were invited to discuss the resident's care. This affected two (#31 and #157) of two residents reviewed for care plan conferences. The facility census was 48. Finding include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 12/23/20, with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, Alzheimer's disease, and type two diabetes. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of Resident #31 revealed Resident #31 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status 14 that indicated she was cognitively intact. Interview on 04/26/23 at 11:52 A.M., with family of Resident #31 stated she had only had one care conference offered to her which was on 01/03/23. Resident #31 family stated the facility had not called her or informed her at the facility, of care conferences being held. Resident #31 family stated she would like to ask questions about her mother's care. Review of care conferences notes for Resident #31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations, family and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to inform a resident's family of an injury/change in condition. This affected one (#157) of one resident reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #157 revealed an admission date of 04/18/23, with diagnoses including cellulitis of the left lower limb, and pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the assessment had not yet been completed for Resident #157 but was in process dated 04/25/23, for a new admission. Resident #157 is assessed as having cognitive impairiment. Review of the progress note dated 04/20/23 revealed the resident was switched from her regular bed into a bariatric bed with side rails. Resident had right side weakness and had difficulty holding herself up in bed without them. A progress note dated 04/23/23 revealed. resident was receiving care and was turned on her left side for peri care when the bed moved and resident's hand was caught between moved, side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, resident and family interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in a resident room. This affected one (#157) of five residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #157 revealed an admission date of 04/18/23, with diagnoses including cellulitis of the left lower limb, and pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment had not yet been completed for Resident #157 but was in process dated 04/25/23, for a new admission. Resident #157 is assessed as having cognitive impairiment. Observation on 04/24/23 at 9:00 A.M., 12:20 P.M., 2:33 P.M., and 4:40 P.M., revealed Resident #157 was sitting in bed or in the wheelchair during several observations. A Hoyer lift was observed stored int he room during these observations. Observation and interview on 04/25/23 at 9:00 A.M., with Resident #157 and Resident #157's family revealed the Hoyer lift had been kept in the room most days since admission. Observation of the family member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a wound was assessed timely and evaluate the wound for treatment. This affected one (#157) of two residents reviewed for wound care. The facility identified seven current residents with wounds. The facility failed to correlate hospice services with the facility service for a resident on hospice. This affected one (#106) of one resident reviewed for hospice service. The facility identified three current residents receiving hospice services. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #157 revealed an admission date of 04/18/23, with diagnoses including cellulitis of the left lower limb, and pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the assessment had not yet been completed for Resident #157 but was in process dated 04/25/23, for a new admission. Resident #157 is assessed as having cognitive impairment. Review of KCI wound vacuum (vac) order form dated 04/17/23 revealed resident wound measured…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of accidents/ hazards and failed complete a thorough fall investigation. This affected two (#157 and #45) of five residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for the Resident #157 revealed an admission date of 04/18/23, with diagnoses including cellulitis of the left lower limb, and pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the assessment had not yet been completed for Resident #157 but was in process dated 04/25/23, for a new admission. Resident #157 is assessed as having cognitive impairment. Review of the progress note dated 04/20/23 revealed the resident was switched from her regular bed into a bariatric bed with side rails. Resident #157 had right side weakness and had difficulty holding herself up in bed without them. Review of therapy notes dated 04/20/23 revealed the resident required max assistance of two staff to roll and bed mobility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely act upon a pharmacy drug regimen review to draw laboratory test. This affected one (#45) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Record review of Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 03/30/21, with diagnoses including: osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral and sacrococcygeal region, muscle weakness, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, generalized anxiety disorder, anemia, schizoaffective disorder, altered mental status, and visual hallucinations. Review of a pharmacy recommendation dated 01/03/23 revealed a recommendation to monitor lipid panel and liver function tests every six months. The Physician Assistant agreed with the recommendation to draw the lab. Review of Resident #45 medical record on 04/27/23 revealed no documentation of a lipid panel and liver function tests being completed. Interview on 04/27/23 at 10:32 A.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was not a lipid panel and liver function completed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during a dressing change. This affected one (#157) of one resident observed for dressing change. The facility identified seven residents who currently have wounds. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #157 revealed an admission date of 04/18/23, with diagnoses including cellulitis of the left lower limb, and pain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the assessment had not yet been completed for Resident #157 but was in process dated 04/25/23, for a new admission. Resident #157 is assessed as having cognitive impairment. Review of KCI wound vacuum (vac) order form dated 04/17/23 revealed resident wound measured 5.3-centimeter (cm) x 6.2 cm x 0.5 cm. Review of hospital record dated 04/18/23 revealed the resident had been diagnosed with Left Lower Extremities (LLE) cellulitis and hematoma requiring debridement of eschar and evacuation of hematoma on 04/14/23 and wound vac was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-23 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides received a performance review at least every 12 months. This affected three State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) (#90, #503, and #514) of four nurse aide personnel records reviewed, with the potential to affect all 61 residents in the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for STNA #90 revealed a hire date of 07/25/23 and works on the skilled nursing rehabilitation unit. No annual or 90-day evaluations could be provided according to facility documentation. Review of the personnel file for STNA #503 revealed a hire date of 07/29/14 and works on the skilled nursing rehabilitation unit. No annual evaluations could be provided according to facility documentation. Review of the personnel file for STNA #514 revealed a hire date of 02/27/24 and works on the skilled nursing rehabilitation unit. No annual or 90-day evaluations could be provided according to facility documentation. Interview on 05/23/24 at 1:59 P.M., with the Administrator verified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$134,320 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $101,940 — penalty dated 2026-02-26
  • $32,380 — penalty dated 2025-02-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CITADEL HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 53.2-2.2 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 53.5-2.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DAUBENMIRE, KEVINIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
CAPITAL FINANCE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
ELKINS WAY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2024
JUSCHKA, DIRKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024
OBRYANT, RAMONAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-24.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$919K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 12%Other / private 17%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $919K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$401per resident / day
operating cost
$12,193per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365694. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next