No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Amberwood Care Centre

2313 North Rockton Avenue, Rockford, IL 61103 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 135 certified beds · (815) 964-2200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (815) 964-2200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited May 2025
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2350 N Rockton Ave · (815) 971-7600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3803 Auburn St · (815) 963-3705 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3118 N Rockton Ave · (815) 329-6133 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2815 Overdene Ave · (815) 987-8800 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.9%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms88.0%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.5%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.0%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.6%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.6%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.8%4.8%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.2%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.4%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.5%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.7%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.6%13.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.692.021.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.962.221.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 68 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

36.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF36.6%CMS range 27.2–46.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 7.7–15.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified64.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.0–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.14
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
28.4%
Total nursing turnover
23.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 122.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-11)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2023-06-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was supervised while being toileted to prevent an injury. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety/supervision in the sample of 7. The findings include:R1's face sheet lists her diagnoses to include: Alzheimer's Disease and dementia. R1's unwitnessed incident report dated 2/18/26 shows, CNA (certified nursing assistant) informed writer that resident was on the floor in her bathroom. Nurse arrived observed resident sitting on buttocks with shirt on, brief down to the ankles, and with gripper socks on. The same report also shows, R1 is oriented to person only and other info shows, Resident stated to CNA I will like some privacy while using the restroom. On 2/25/26 at 1:11 PM, V6 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated, he admitted R1 when she came to the facility a day before. She was agitated about being at the facility but eventually calmed down. She would try to stand up by herself sometimes. She was a high fall risk.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was seen by a podiatrist. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for foot care in the sample of 4.The findings include:R1's face sheet shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, COPD, type 2 diabetes with diabetic peripheral angiopathy with gangrene, anxiety, and peripheral vascular disease.On 10/27/25 at 10:33 AM, R1 was in his room lying in bed. R1 said he has been at the facility for about six months and has not seen a podiatrist yet. R1 said he has told several staff, and their response is he will get put on the list to be seen. R1's left big toenail was extremely overgrown (approximately 2 inches long), curved, thickened, jagged, with yellowish discoloration. R1 has an amputee to his left 3rd toe digit and the remaining toenails are long and overgrown.On 10/27/25 at 11:12 AM, V5 (Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility was at a comfortable temperature and failed to accurately assess and monitor ambient room temperatures during an outage of the air conditioning system. This applies to all residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility provided a resident roster dated 6/23/25 showing 121 residents were residing in the facility. R2's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility 11/2/23 with diagnoses to include dysarthria, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, muscle weakness, depression, congestive heart failure, and atherosclerotic heart disease. R7's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility 9/5/23 with diagnoses to include Multiple sclerosis, venous insufficiency, muscle spasm, hyperlipidemia, muscle weakness, hypertension, and activated protein c resistance. R8's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility 9/7/23 with diagnoses to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, cognitive communication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure foods were dated, expired foods were discarded, and kitchen temperature logs were complete. This applies to all residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility census report dated 6/30/25 showed 123 residents resided in the facility. On 7/1/25 at 9:29 AM, the reach-in refrigerator had multiple food items missing dates. The items included five plated lettuce salads, half a brick of open butter, open cheese slices, a plastic container of fruit cocktail, an open bag of shredded cheese, an opened and browning bag of shredded lettuce. The same refrigerator had a plastic container of puree bread dated 6/23 and a cut up watermelon dated 6/25. A stainless-steel pan held an undated turkey breast in the same refrigerator. At 9:39 AM, V5 (Dietary Aide) stated any undated food needs to be tossed out. No date means it must go in the garbage. The dates tell us when it is too old to serve and when the food has gone bad. On 7/1/25 at 9:45 AM, the walk-in refrigerator had approximately 28…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 3. The findings include: On 5/14/25 at 10:38 AM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), said R1 did not fall on 4/30/25, the last time he fell prior to 4/30/25 was on 4/23/25. V2 agreed that her report to IDPH dated 5/1/25 could be misleading since it shows the date of incident is 4/30/25 at 6:00 PM, then describes R1 being found on the floor. V2 said they attributed R1's rib fractures (discovered on 4/30/25) to his fall from 4/23/25. V2 said she did not do an additional report on R1's rib fractures as an injury of unknown origin. On 5/14/25 at 11:09 AM, V3, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), said R1 fell on (Wednesday) 4/23/25. R1 was found at the end of his roommate's bed on the floor on his bottom, he was not in a weird position, and no objects were present that he would have fallen onto. V3 said R1's roommate said R1 was walking to the bathroom and fell to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain and anxiety medications were documented on the Medication Administration Record for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medications. The findings include: R1's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility 2/14/23 with diagnoses to include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Depression, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, anemia, atherosclerotic heart disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, and peripheral vascular disease. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed he has severe cognitive impairment. R1's January 2025 Physician Order Sheet showed, Ativan 0.5 mg give 0.25 tablet by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety .Norco 5-325 mg Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain . Tylenol Extra Strength Oral Tablet 500 mg . Give 2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain . R1's January 2025 eMAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment to 4 of 25 residents (R92, R28, R19, R84) reviewed for clean, comfortable, homelike environment in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On 9/9/24 at 8:31 AM, R92 was seated in a wheelchair in his room. Multiple areas of chipped paint were noted on the walls of R92's room. Large, grease-like stains were noted across the walls of R92's room. Large black scuff marks were noted on the wall behind R92's bed. A urinal, half-filled with urine, sat on the floor, by R92's bed. A strong odor of urine was noted in R92's bathroom. R92 stated, My bathroom stinks. My room is dirty looking. I don't live like this. I am a clean person. I have to empty that (urinal). They don't. 2. On 9/9/24 at 10:00 AM, V7 (Power of Attorney (POA) for R28) was in the facility, visiting R28. V7 stated, This place is filthy. The walls are chipped and dirty. V7 pointed to the wall by R28's bathroom. The wall had multiple scuff marks with missing, chipped paint. On 9/9/28 at 11:38 AM, V7 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for a resident that required a sleep study for 1 of 25 residents (R28) reviewed for necessary care and services in the sample of 25. The findings include: R28's admission Record dated 9/29/23 showed R28 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of insomnia, dysarthia (difficulty speaking), dysphagia, and CVA (cerebrovascular accident) with right arm/leg hemiplegia (weakness). R28's current care plan showed R28 was dependent on staff for toileting, repositioning, mobility, and transfers. On 9/9/24 at 10:00 AM, V7 (Power of Attorney (POA) for R28) was in the facility, visiting R28. V7 stated, He (R28) was supposed to have a sleep test done months ago but it was never done. They said it was because they didn't have a way to transport him (to the test) after 5 PM. I can't take him myself. He's dead weight. I can't lift him in and out of the car. I also live an hour away. R28's Nurse Practitioner (NP) note dated 12/4/23 showed, Sleep medicine study if ok with PCP (primary care physician)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify a resident's pressure injury prior to the injury becoming a Stage 2. The facility also failed to implement pressure injury prevention interventions and pressure relieving interventions. These failures apply to 2 of 6 residents (R28, R120) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R28's admission Record dated 9/29/23 showed R28 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dysarthia (difficulty speaking), dysphagia, diabetes mellitus, and CVA (cerebrovascular accident) with right arm/leg hemiplegia (weakness). R28's care plan dated 9/21/24 showed R28 was dependent on staff for toileting, repositioning, mobility, and transfers. The plan showed, Check all of body for breaks in skin and treat promptly as ordered by doctor. R28's Monthly Summary report dated 8/10/24 showed R28 had no pressure injuries or impairments to his skin. R28's nurse notes dated 8/11/24-9/8/24 showed no documentation of R28 having any pressure injuries or wounds. On 9/9/24 at 10:00 AM, V7 (Power of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide treatment and services to residents with limited range of motion to to 2 of 10 residents (R120, R34) reviewed for limited range of motion in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1.R120's diagnoses include stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) with right sided limitations. R120's admit date [DATE]. On 9/9/24 on 9:10 AM, R120 was in bed. R120 was alert and smiling but aphasic (inability to express herself/communicate) R120's right hand was contracted closed fist and whole right hand curled inward. R120's latest Restorative assessment dated [DATE] show R120 has limitations to extremities including R120's upper extremities. On 9/10/24 at 8:25 AM- (V4) previous Restorative Nurse said R120 was admitted from home due to stroke (admit date [DATE]), with right hand contractures. R120 was assessed at that time due to limited range of motion to her right hand but R120 was not on any Restorative Program (range of motion-ROM). R120 also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident did not attempt to exit the facility out a fire exit door, and failed to transfer a resident with a gait belt which applies to 2 of 25 residents (R39, R104) reviewed for safety in a sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R39's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R39 to be a [AGE] year old male male with moderate cognitive deficits. This Assessment showed R39 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which include: cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia an hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction, and history of traumatic brain injury. On 9/9/24 at 12:10 PM, R39 was attempting to go out the South East fire exit door in his wheelchair at the end of the hallway. The exit door is adjacent to R39's room. R39 pushed the release bar to open the door. The door alarm was not going off when the door was opened. There was no staff in the hallway at the time R39 opened the door. R39 was in his wheelchair having…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain resident catheters below the level of the bladder and keep the drainage bag off the floor. This applies to 3 of 8 (R66, R90, R39) residents reviewed for catheters in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On 9/9/2024 at 11:09AM, R66's urinary catheter drainage bag was observed hanging on the resident's walker level with the resident's bladder. Urine was observed sitting in the catheter tubing with sediment present in the tubing. On 9/10/2024 at 11:53AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) said catheter bags should be kept below the level of the resident's bladder to prevent infections. R66's Order Summary Report dated 9/9/2024 shows an order for Foley Catheter, change monthly and PRN (as needed). 2. On 9/9/24 at 11:00 AM, R90 was sitting in his reclined wheelchair in his room. R90's urinary catheter drainage bag was tucked to R90's right side hip level above the level of the bladder. At 12: 15 pm- R90 was still in his room watching TV, catheter bag remained in the same position, tucked on his right side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to wash hands and change gloves and failed to implement Enhance Barrier Precaution (EBP) for 2 of 25 residents ( R104, R39) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On 9/9/24 at 9:10 AM, V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) was providing incontinence care to R104. R104 had a bowel movement. After providing incontinence care and without changing her soiled gloves, V11 turned R104 side to side and applied new incontinent brief, applied R104's blanket, pulled the privacy curtain, opened R104's closet looking for clothings then said she needs to go out and get something. V11 then removed her soiled gloves and left R104's room without washing her hands. On 9/11/24 at 8:10 AM, V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing -ADON) said staff should change their gloves and wash their hands when completing dirty task to clean task, when the gloves is visibly soiled and when a tasks was completed wash hands to prevent the spread of infection. The Facility Policy entitled Personal Protective Equipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the residents received the correct portion size of fried potatoes, mixed vegetable, and pureed Italian sausage during the lunch meal for all residents receiving meals in the facility. The findings include: The facility data sheet dated 6/15/24 shows 126 residents reside in the facility. On 6/15/24 at 12:06PM, V5 (Dietary Aide) was plating the lunch meal. There were three large pans on the steam table: one with Italian sausage, one with mixed vegetable, one with shredded potatoes. There were four smaller pans, one with chopped/ground Italian sausage, pureed Italian sausage and bun, mashed potatoes, and pureed vegetables. The large pan of mixed vegetables had a spoodle with a white handle resting in it. V5 verified this spoodle was a 3 ounce serving size (not the recommended 4 ounce). V5 used the spoodle to scoop up a level serving size of the mixed vegetables and put it on the plates. V5 used his gloved hand to measure a handful of shredded potatoes and put the handful of potatoes on the plate. V5 filled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have a narcotic pain patch available for a resident as ordered. This failure applies to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for pain medications in the sample of ten. The findings include: The facility face sheet for R1 shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include spinal stenosis, bipolar disorder, emphysema, and encephalopathy. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R1 to be cognitively intact and is dependent on staff for his care. The December 2023 Physician orders shows an order for a narcotic pain patch to be applied and replaced every 72 hours. The medication administration record for December 2023 shows no pain patch was applied on 12/24/23 or 12/25/23. On 1/10/24 at 1:00PM, R1 said he went without his pain patches for two days and was told the pharmacy had run out of them. On 1/10/24 at 9:30 AM, V9 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) said she had placed a pain patch on R1 on 12/26/23, the day the patches…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide privacy to a resident while providing personal care. This applies to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 16. Findings include: The facility face sheet for R1 shows diagnosis to include spinal stenosis, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms and schizoaffective disorder. The facility assessment dated [DATE] for R1 shows him to have severe cognitive impairment and requires maximum assistance with all care. On 11/15/23 at 11:00 AM, R1 was being provided perineal care by V8 and V9 both Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). R1 was completely naked and being turned side to side. The privacy curtain between the two beds was not pulled. R1's room mate and V3 Hospice Registered Nurse (RN) were both in the room and had a clear view of the care being provided to R1. On 11/15/23 at 11:10 AM, V3 Hospice RN said she wished the staff had closed the privacy curtain while providing care to R1. V3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to continue an ordered antibiotic when a resident returned from the hospital. This applies to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for medications on the sample list of 16. Findings inlcude: The facility face sheet for R1 shows diagnosis to include spinal stenosis, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms and schizoaffective disorder. The facility assessment dated [DATE] for R1 shows him to have severe cognitive impairment and requires maximum assistance with all cares. The hospital records for R1 show he was in the hospital from [DATE] to 10/27/23 with a diagnosis of pyelonephritis (Kidney infection). The final discharge medication list from R1's 10/27/23 hospital discharge shows an order for cefdiner (antibiotic) to be given twice a day for the next 5 days starting on 10/27/23. The October Medication Administration Record (MAR) shows the medication was not started until 10/31/23. (4 days after the ordered start date) The Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident while sitting unsupervised outside on a patio for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety on the sample list of 6. The findings include: R1's admission Record printed 9/16/23 shows she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis (partial paralysis on one side of the body) affecting Right side, Aphasia (inability to understand or express speech) following Cerebral Infarction, and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquid). R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R1 had severe cognitive impairment. This assessment shows she required extensive assistance of 2 staff with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. R1 was not steady with moving from a seated to standing position, walking, turning around, moving on and off the toilet, and with surface-to-surface transfers. R1's cognition care plan initiated 8/5/23 shows she has impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure holes in a resident's room were repaired and exposed wires were concealed for 1 of 5 residents (R4) reviewed for homelike environment in the sample of 9. The findings include: On 8/30/23 at 9:58 AM, R4's room had a wall above the TV with two cords/wires dangling from an outlet box opening and a cable going to the TV. There was another round hole in the wall above the TV as well. R4 said it, It looks like a piece of junk and it sure doesn't look like a professional job; it could be done right to look nice. On 8/30/23 at 10:12 AM, V3, Maintenance Director, went to R4's room and said he can put a plate cover over the outlet hole. V3 said the other hole is from a previous TV mount and he could mud it and cover the hole. V3 said he does not think the exposed wires/cords are a safety issue, but he could cover the hole to make it appear nicer. The Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities handbook (rev November 2018) shows, Your facility must be safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the designated smoking area was kept clean and safe for smoking. The facility failed to ensure residents were supervised when smoking, fall interventions were implemented, and extension cords were not being used for 4 of residents (R82, R21, R77, & R12) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 25 and 1 resident (R3) outside of the sample. The findings include: 1. On 6/27/23 at 9:42 AM, R82 was sitting on the side of her bed and stated she wanted to talk about the smoking [NAME] at the facility. R82 stated, We used to have a metal can for an ashtray in the smoking [NAME]. It was like a metal soup can. The maintenance guy took it away and said it was a fire hazard. We all sit inside the [NAME] and smoke 2-3 cigarettes in 15 minutes and we don't have anywhere to put them so we have to throw them on the floor. At least having the can was safer because it kept the cigarettes and ashes contained. Staff go out there with drinks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's dignity by knocking prior to entering a resident's room and failed to change soiled linens. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R14) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 25. The findings include: R14's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an original admission date of 12/26/2020 with diagnoses to include: anxiety, altered mental status, and muscle weakness. R14's 4/10/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed he had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of 12 out 15. The MDS showed he was totally dependent on two staff for bed mobility and transfers. On 6/27/23 at 9:38 V12 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) entered R14's room without knocking or announcing who she was. V12 made several paces into the room, observed the State surveyor in the room, said whoops, sorry and exited the room. V12 then knocked on the door, said patient care and entered the room. V12 opened the resident's closet without permission, grabbed an unknown item, then left. On 6/27/23 at 9:38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide incontinent care prior to the resident developing inflamed skin; failed to provide oral care; and failed to provide handwashing. This applies to 4 of 4 (R2, R14, R72, & R16) residents reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R2's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an original admission date of 11/22/2017 with diagnoses to include: stroke, epilepsy, diabetes, and quadriplegia. R2's 5/4/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed she had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of 6 out of 15. R2's MDS showed she was totally dependent on two staff for bed mobility and transfers. R2's Cognition Care Plan from (revision 9/26/2021) showed she has impaired cognitive function, has poor self and environmental awareness .has difficulty being able to respond to such communications appropriately . R2's Care Plan also showed she is at risk for impaired skin integrity. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor resident weights per physician request and failed to ensure a knee immobilizer was applied per physician order for 3 of 5 residents (R13, R38, and R27) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R13's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Type 2 Diabetes, obesity, chronic gout, chronic ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. R13's June 2023 physician order sheet showed no orders for routine weight monitoring. R13's 3/24/23 Cardiology NP (Nurse Practitioner) note showed, . Chief Complaint: Routine Cardiology follow-up CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) . Plan: 1. Chronic diastolic heart failure: Fluid status appears stable . Will continue current doses of hydrochlorothiazide, lisinopril, and Carvedilol as ordered. Please notify cardiology of any 3 pound weight gain overnight or 5 pounds in 1 week .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a catheter bag was maintained in a way to prevent cross contamination and failed to ensure catheter orders and maintenance interventions were in place for 2 of 4 residents (R46) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R46's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include unspecified wound of left buttock, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, retention of urine, spinal stenosis, major depressive disorder, and presence of urogenital implants. R46's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed he has moderate cognitive deficits, has an indwelling catheter in place, and requires extensive assistance for all cares. On 6/28/23 at 11:08 AM, R46 was in his bed, positioned in the mechanical lift sling, and had his catheter drainage bag sitting in between his legs in his lap and above the level of his bladder. Urine with sediment was visible in the catheter tubing. R46's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with a continuous tube feeding was in the proper position for 1 of 3 residents (R72) reviewed for tube feeding in the sample of 25. The findings include: On 06/27/23 at 11:03 AM , R72 was lying in bed. The R72's head of the bed (HOB) was at 20-30 degrees. R72 had slid down in the bed and his neck was resting at the bed in the bed. R72's head was bent forward and almost flat on the bed. R72 stated, My neck is hurting. I always slid down and when I get like this for too long, it hurts my neck. R72 had tube feeding infusing via a feeding pump at 70 ml/hr (milliliters/hour). On 6/29/23 at 8:19 AM, R72 was in the same position. The HOB was elevated at 20-30 degrees, but R72 had slid down in the bed and his head was bent forward and to the left at the bend in the bed. R72's feet were against the foot of the bed and his knees were bent up in the air. R72 stated, I think I need a new position. I always slid down like this. R72's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the filter on a resident's oxygen concentrator was clean, a nasal canula was not left laying on the floor, and oxygen was administered as needed for a resident (R21) reviewed for oxygen in the sample of 25. The findings include: On 6/28/23 at 7:53 AM, R21 was not in his room. His oxygen concentrator was turned on and running; his nasal cannula was on the floor on the far side of his bed and out of his reach. The oxygen tubing was not marked as to when it was last changed. The bubbler on R21's oxygen concentrator was a disposable kind, that was a quarter full and not dated. The filter on the back of the oxygen concentrator was buckled and filled with thick layers of gray dust. On 6/28/23 at 8:51 AM, R21 was sitting in his wheelchair in his room and appeared a little short of breath. R21's nasal canula was on the floor, on the far side of his bed, and out of reach. R21 stated he had come back from breakfast a little while ago and did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were available for 1 of 1 resident (R13) reviewed for medications in the sample of 25. The findings include: R13's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Type 2 Diabetes, obesity, chronic gout, chronic ischemic heart disease, hypertension, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. R13's care plan initiated 5/16/22 showed, The resident has hypertension related to inappropriate diet, lifestyle choices, and stroke . Interventions: . Give anti-hypertensive medications as ordered . R13's record included another care plan initiated 5/16/22 that showed, The resident has coronary artery disease related to hypercholesterolemia, hypertension . Interventions: . Give all cardiac medications as ordered by the physician. Monitor and document for side effects. Report adverse reactions to MD (physician) PRN (as needed) . Give medications for hypertension . R13's June 2023 eMAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to handle soiled linens and change gloves after providing incontinence care to prevent cross-contamination. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R2 &R32) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R2's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an original admission date of 11/22/2017 with diagnoses to include: stroke, epilepsy, diabetes, and quadriplegia. R2's 5/4/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed she had severe cognitive impairment with a brief interview for mental status score of 6 out of 15. R2's MDS showed she was totally dependent on two staff for bed mobility and transfers. R2's Cognition Care Plan from (revision 9/26/2021) showed she has impaired cognitive function, has poor self and environmental awareness .has difficulty being able to respond to such communications appropriately . R2's Care Plan also showed she is at risk for impaired skin integrity. On 6/27/23 at 8:54 AM, R2 was in bed and asleep on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner. This applies to 2 of 25 residents (R26 and R18) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On April 4, 2022, at 12:08PM, R26 was being fed lunch by V11 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). V11 stated we have two feeders here today. R26 was in the same room as R18. 2. On April 4, 2022, at 12:08PM, R18 was being fed lunch by V12 CNA. V11 stated we have two feeders here today. R18 was in the same room as R26. On April 5, 2022, at 12:16PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said residents should be called by their preferred name and it is not acceptable to call residents names such as feeders. The facility's Quality of Life - Dignity policy last revised on 2009 shows staff shall speak respectfully to residents at all times. and not labeling or referring to residents by his or her. care needs.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for a resident during personal cares for one of 25 residents (R2) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 25. The findings include: On 4/4/22 at 10:45 AM, V6 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was providing personal peri care to R2. V6 did not pull R2's privacy curtain closed. R2's roommate was sitting in the room in his wheel chair facing R2 on R2's left side. R2 was laying in his bed, V6 was standing on R2's right side. V6 removed R2's incontinence brief and exposed R2's genital area. R2's genital area was visible to R2's roommate. On 4/5/22 at 10:23 AM, R2 said he would like the privacy curtain to be closed during personal cares. R2 said one time the CNA had to ask R2's roommate to quit looking at R2 during personal care. On 4/5/22 at 10:46 AM, V9 CNA said that the resident's curtain should be closed during incontinence care to provide the resident with privacy. On 4/05/22 at 12:18 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said staff should pull the resident's privacy curtain closed during incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement a policy for the recording of grievances for 1 of 25 residents (R6) reviewed for grievances in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On April 4, 2022, at 2:45PM, V1 Administrator said there was a complaint on January 15, 2022, from R6's family member regarding staff speaking disrespectfully to her in front of R6. V1 said there was no grievance form completed after the grievance was received from R6's family member. V1 said she wasn't aware a grievance form needed to be completed for this incident. The facility's Grievance Policy does not ensure that all written grievance decisions include the date the grievance was received, a summary statement of the resident's grievance, the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, intervention, and record review the facility failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination for three of 25 residents (R79, R2, R4) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R79's Order Summary Report dated 4/5/22 shows R79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness, personal history of covid-19, major depressive disorder, dysphonia, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, multiple sclerosis, convulsions, infection and inflammatory reaction due to other urinary catheter, and spinal stenosis. On 4/4/22 at 10:59 AM, V6 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) wiped R79's front peri area and buttock area. There was a small amount of stool to R79's buttock. V6 touched R79's sink knobs, R79 urinary catheter bag, touched R79's body to reposition her, touch R79's head and arms all without changing her gloves or performing hand hygiene. 2. On 4/4/22 at 10:45 AM, V6 CNA performed incontinence care for R2. V6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure injury prevention interventions were in place and failed to identify a deep tissue injury (DTI) for two of four residents (R79, R2) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R79's Order Summary Report dated 4/5/22 shows R79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness, personal history of covid-19, major depressive disorder, dysphonia, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, multiple sclerosis, convulsions, and spinal stenosis. On 4/4/22 at 10:02 AM, V7 Wound Care Nurse said that R79 has a stage four pressure injury located to her sacrum. V7 did not state that R79 had a pressure injury to her right foot. On 4/4/22 at 10:59 AM V6 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was performing incontinence care for R79. R79 had a large dressing located to her sacral area. The bottom of R79's dressing towards her rectum was not intact. There was gauze packing that was falling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 8 residents (R104) reviewed for foot care received toenail care in the sample in 25. The findings include: On 4/4/22 at 11:05 AM R104 was lying in bed without socks. R104 said he needs his toenails trimmed. R104 said the guy that comes to trim toenails doesn't take his insurance. R104's toenails were long and thick with debris under & around them. R104's Face Sheet dated 4/6/22 shows R104's diagnoses include, but are not limited to, Type 2 Diabetes. R104's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows he is cognitively intact. R104's Current Care Plan (Review last completed 2/11/22) shows R104 has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Self Care performance deficit and requires limited assistance by one staff member participation with personal hygiene. R104's Current Care plan also shows he has Diabetes and should be referred to the podiatrist/foot care nurse to monitor/document foot care needs and to cut long nails. R104's Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place for three of 25 residents (R2, R72, R39) reviewed for safety in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R2's Order Summary Report dated 4/5/22 shows R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Acquired absence of leg below knee, neuralgia and neuritis, macular degeneration, heart disease, polyneuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, and sepsis. R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] shows R2 has a high risk for falling. R2's Care Plan initiated 7/1/16 shows, [R2] is high risk for falls related to BLE (bilateral lower extremity) amputation. [R2] needs a safe environment with even floors free from spills and or clutter, adequate, glare free light, a working and reachable call light, the bed in low position at night, handrails on walls, and personal items within reach. [R2] uses chair/bed electronic alarm. Ensure the device is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to keep a urinary drainage bag below the level of the bladder for one of three residents (R79) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 25. The findings include: R79's Order Summary Report dated 4/5/22 shows R79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Weakness, neuropathic bladder, convulsions, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, multiple sclerosis, and infection and inflammatory reaction due to other urinary catheter. An order for ertapenem sodium solution daily for ESBL in urine. R79's Care Plan initiated 9/21/21 shows she has been on antibiotics a multiple different times due to urinary tract infections. On 4/4/22 at 10:59 AM, V6 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) lifted R79's urinary drainage bag above the level of her bladder multiple times to reposition the urinary drainage bag. The urinary drainage bag and tubing had urine in it. On 4/5/22 at 10:30 AM, V8 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) said urinary drainage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a residenta midline intravenous access (IV) site based upon professional standard of practice by not changing the dressing for one of one resident (R79) reviewed for IV access in the sample of 25. The findings include: On 4/4/22 at 10:28 AM, R79 had a midline IV access site to her left upper arm. The date on the dressing was 3/28/22. R79 stated she did not know when the dressing was last changed. The edges of the dressing were peeling up. On 4/5/22 at 1:39 PM, the same dressing was present to R79's left upper arm. The dressing was still peeling up at the edges. The dressing was dated 3/28/22. R79 said she was not sure how often they change the dressing. (Same dressing on for eight days). R79's Order Summary Report dated 4/5/22 shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: weakness, personal history of covid-19, convulsions, sciatica, pressure injury of sacral region stage four, multiple sclerosis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine was obtained for one resident (R104) with obstructive sleep apnea out of 5 reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 25. The findings include: On 04/04/22 at 10:42 AM, R104 said he has not had his CPAP machine since being admitted to the facility. No CPAP machine was seen in R104's room. On 04/05/22 at 01:03 PM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), said she believes R104's CPAP has broken parts which have been on backorder. V2 said they wouldn't take a patient if they could not meet their needs. On 04/05/22 at 01:19 PM, V1, Administrator, said she knows R104's CPAP machine which he brought from home was infested with bedbugs and has been bagged up since he arrived in August [2021]. V1 said she believes V3, Assistant DON (ADON) might be working on getting a new CPAP machine for R104. On 04/05/22 at 01:28 PM, V3 said R104 brought an infested CPAP machine with him when he was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement pain management interventions for one of 25 residents (R79) reviewed for pain in the sample of 25. The findings include: R79's Order Summary Report dated 4/5/22 shows R79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness, personal history of covid-19, major depressive disorder, dysphonia, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, multiple sclerosis, convulsions, and spinal stenosis. On 4/4/22 at 10:28 AM, R79 complained of pain to her right shoulder and asked V4 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) for an ice pack. V4 told R79 she would get an ice pack. On 4/4/22 at 10:59 AM, during incontinence care and repositioning, R79 complained of pain and discomfort to her right shoulder. R79 told V6 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) that she had asked V4 for an ice pack. On 4/4/22 at 2:15 PM, R79 did not have an ice pack to her right shoulder. V4 came into R79's room to help with repositioning and R79 asked V4 again if she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 27 opportunities with 9 errors resulting in a 33.33% error rate. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R79, R104) observed in the medication pass. 1. R79's Order Summary Report dated 4/5/22 shows an order for Arginaid packet two times daily for wound healing, Ascorbic Acid 500 mg (milligram) two times daily, cholecalciferol 1000 units two times per day, enulose solution (lactulose) give 15 ml (milliliters) one time a day for constipation, keppra tablet 1000 mg two times a day for seizures, morphine sulfate ER (extended release) 15 mg every 12 hours for pain, senna S 8.6 mg-50 mg two tablets two times a day for bowel management, and sodium chloride table 1 gram two tablets by mouth three times per day for low sodium. It shows R79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including weakness, personal history of covid-19, major depressive disorder, dysphonia, pressure ulcer of sacral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food processing equipment was properly sanitized before using for 3 of 3 residents (R18, R21 and R26) reviewed for sanitization in the sample of 25. The findings include: The facility provided list shows that R18, R21 and R26 are on a pureed diet. On 4/4/22 at 10:44 AM, V13 (Dietary Supervisor) pureed hot dogs. V13 brought the mixing bowl, blade, lid and spatula to the 3 compartment sink to clean. V13 dipped the equipment into the sanitization sink and then removed. V13 then immediately used it to make pureed bean. At 10:52 AM, V13 brought the same equipment to the 3 compartment sink after pureeing beans. V13 submerged the equipment for 30 seconds and then immediately used to make pureed broccoli. On 4/4/22 at 10:57 AM, V14 (Dietary Manager) said that equipment should be fully submerged in the sanitizer for 1 minute and then air dried before using it. The facility's Manual-Sanitizing in Three-Compartment Sink Policy revised on 5/20/14 shows,After washing and rinsing utensils or equipment are sanitized in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CITADEL HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
TODD STERN 2015 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 12/30/2021
GRAF, MARCELLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/03/2018
LABAK, SANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025
LOGAN, JULIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2023
RIPSTEIN, KENNETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/30/2021
STERN, TODDIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 14%Medicare 5%Other / private 81%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$305per resident / day
operating cost
$9,286per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$290per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145908. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next