Century Villa Health Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 94 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 70.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for respect and dignity. (Resident C, D and E)Findings include: During an interview, on 6/15/26 at 1:30 p.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated CNA 1 was terminated for poor verbal customer service. There were three (3) alert and oriented residents who indicated CNA 1 was rude and loud when she talked to them.During an interview, on 6/15/24 at 2:40 p.m., Resident E indicated CNA 1 spoke very loud, rude, and in a harsh tone whenever she provided care for her. CNA 1 would talk in a loud and harsh tone to her roommate. Resident E's daughter indicated CNA 1 did not talk to Resident E's roommate with respect and dignity. During an interview, on 6/15/26 at 3:09 p.m., Resident C indicated CNA 1 was very rude to her. She used her position to let you know she was the person in charge. She indicated CNA 1 treated her with disrespect. During an interview, on 6/15/26 at 3:15 p.m., Resident D indicated CNA 1 was very rude and spoke to her with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative received notification in writing of the facility's bed hold policy, the Ombudsman was notified when a resident's was transferred and discharged to the hospital, and discharge paperwork provided to a resident's caregiver did not contain another resident's information for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident 37 and C)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 12/12/25 at 2:38 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, hypertension, osteoporosis, chronic kidney disease, and pain. A facility reported incident, dated 11/23/25 at 5:01 p.m., indicated Resident 37 had a fall, was sent to the hospital, and was hospitalized . The clinical record did not include documentation to indicate the bed hold policy was provided to the resident's representative in writing or the Ombudsman was notified of the transfer to the hospital. During an interview, on 12/16/25 at 10:30 a.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessments were completed and daily weights were obtained for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 21 and 46)Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 21 was reviewed on 12/15/25 at 11:39 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, delusional disorder, persistent mood disorder, and dementia without behavioral disturbances. A care plan, dated 8/8/23, indicated Resident 21 was at risk for adverse side effects related to the use of antipsychotic and antidepressant medication. A physician's order, dated 11/14/24, indicated to administer Invega (an atypical antipsychotic medication) extended release 1.5 milligram (mg) tablet once a day at bedtime. A physician's order, dated 10/16/25, indicated to administer Pristiq (an antidepressant medication) extended release 25 mg tablet once a day. An Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment, dated 2/21/24 at 12:16 p.m., indicated the involuntary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked when not in direct observation of staff for 1 of 4 medication carts randomly observed for medication storage. (300 hall medication cart) Findings include:During an observation, on 12/12/25 at 10:30 a.m., the 300-hall medication cart was unlocked and unattended.During an observation, on 12/12/25 at 10:32 a.m., LPN 4 came out of room [ROOM NUMBER] and went to the medication cart.During an interview, on 12/12/25 at 10:32 a.m., LPN 4 indicated the medication should not have been left unlocked when she went into room [ROOM NUMBER].During an interview, on 12/17/25 at 11:57 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated medication carts should be locked all times when not in direct supervision of nursing staff.During an interview, on 12/18/25 at 9:21 a.m., QMA 7 indicated medication carts should be kept locked when not in direct observation of the staff member responsible for the cart.During an interview, on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) into an enhanced barrier precaution (EBP) room while providing care for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. (Resident 46)Findings include:During an observation, on 12/16/25 at 3:59 p.m., RN 2 entered Resident 46's room to administer medication and a bolus feed. The resident had a gastrostomy tube (a tube surgically inserted into the stomach to provide medication and nutrition) and was in isolation for enhanced barrier precautions. RN 2 did not put on an isolation gown to administer the medication and bolus feed through the gastrostomy tube.The clinical record for Resident 46 was reviewed on 12/17/25 at 9:28 a.m. The diagnosesincluded, but were not limited to, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, vascular disorder ofthe intestine, gastrostomy status, and [NAME]-Danlos syndrome.A physician's order, dated 7/25/25, indicated Resident 46 was in enhanced barrier precautions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct personal protective equipment (PPE) for contact precautions was used, to perform hand hygiene after resident contact, to utilize enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when required, to protect clean laundry from contamination, to perform hand hygiene and change gloves while performing wound care, and to keep the indwelling catheter tubing from touching the floor for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 19, 33, 47, 18, 20, 38 and 48) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 9/27/24 at 8:54 a.m., QMA 5 was giving medications to Resident 28. After finishing with Resident 28, she walked over to Resident 19 and touched the resident's blanket without wearing a gown or gloves as she asked if the resident needed anything. Resident 19 had an order for contact precautions with a sign on the door. QMA 5 exited the room and walked directly to her medication cart outside the dining room. No hand hygiene was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified timely of a choking episode for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory infection. (Resident 12) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 9/26/24 at 3:59 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease stage 3, psychotic and mood disturbance, anxiety, and vascular dementia with psychotic behavior. A progress note, dated 9/20/24 at 11:07 p.m., indicated the resident choked on hamburger meat during dinner. The resident was breathing but coughing. The resident was unable to bring the food up. The resident was suctioned to remove phlegm and mucus. The resident continued to cough and when she spoke, she made a gurgling sound. The resident's daughter was notified. A triage form, dated 9/20/24 at 7:00 p.m., indicated the resident had a possible aspiration and requested the nurse practitioner (NP) to assess the resident's lung sounds on Monday (9/23/24). A nurse practitioner's progress note, dated 9/23/24, indicated the resident was seen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct amount of oxygen was administered as ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 54) Finding includes: During an observation, on 9/25/24 at 2:23 p.m., Resident 54's oxygen concentrator (a device used to provide supplemental oxygen therapy) was set on 2.5 liters per minute (L). During an observation, on 9/26/24 at 12:20 p.m., the resident was sitting in the common area and his portable oxygen tank was set on 4L. The clinical record for Resident 54 was reviewed on 9/27/24 at 10:22 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. A care plan, dated 6/18/24, indicated the resident was on oxygen therapy. Interventions included, but were not limited to, monitor oxygen saturation, monitor for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress, and administer oxygen by nasal cannula as ordered. A physician's order, dated 7/12/24, indicated the resident was to receive 2L of oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a staff member treated residents with respect and dignity while providing Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care for 3 of 5 residents being reviewed for ADL care. (Resident B, G and H) The deficient practice was corrected on 12/28/23, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: A document, titled Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System, dated 12/22/23 at 7:30 a.m., indicated CNA 1 was being very abrupt and trying to hurry Resident B during ADL care, to the point, she was in tears. CNA 1 acted as if she had no patience for her. The incident was witnessed by the resident's daughter and other staff members. After the incident investigation was completed, it was determined CNA 1 acted abruptly and, in a haste, to do Resident B's ADL care. The resident felt tearful, since she was hurried to do her morning tasks. After interviews with other residents on the date in question and careful consideration, CNA 1 was relieved of her employment at the facility. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease who was a known risk for an elopement was kept safe from eloping from the facility property for 1 of 1 resident being reviewed for elopement. (Resident B) The deficient practice was corrected on 9/30/23, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: An incident report to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH), dated 10/2/23, indicated an elopement event involving a resident occurred on 9/29/23 at 5:55 p.m. A staff member returning to the facility, on 9/29/23 at 5:55 p.m., observed Resident B at the edge of the property by a mailbox of the neighboring property. She stopped and brought the resident back into the facility, then reported the incident. The root cause of the elopement was while a visiting family member came in and out of the facility, the resident followed the family member out of the facility. The resident thought she was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCEPTIONAL LIVING CENTERS — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 49 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $706K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN