No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Siena Woods Care Center

6125 N Main Street, Dayton, OH 45415 · For profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (937) 278-8211 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 278-8211 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
5538 Philadelphia Dr · (937) 424-3589 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5045 N Main St · (937) 279-0468 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
27 Bennington Dr · (208) 972-6393 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5865 Markey Rd · (937) 277-4592 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
5300 Philadelphia Dr · (937) 277-8953

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.2%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.0%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.1%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.5%94.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.7%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.1%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.1%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine56.6%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.2%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit0.0%12.9%12.0%check this — see note marked star below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.1%CMS range 48.2–76.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 6.4–17.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 2.9–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.70
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.15
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
62.4%
Total nursing turnover
57.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-18)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-11)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and physician interviews, policy review, and review of the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for a resident identified at high risk for skin breakdown. The resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #26, who was cognitively impaired, at risk for pressure ulcer development and dependent on staff for turning and repositioning developed an unstageable deep tissue injury to the right heel on 10/02/23 which worsened to a Stage IV pressure ulcer and developed a Stage III pressure ulcer to the sacrum on 12/14/23 due to inadequate and ineffective pressure ulcer prevention/interventions being in place. This affected one (#26) of five reviewed for pressure ulcers. Facility census was 79. Findings included: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included non-traumatic brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, policy review, interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to label and date foods stored in resident designated refrigerators and failed to ensure temperatures were obtained daily for the resident designated refrigerators. This had the potential to affect all residents on Unit 400, except Resident #14 who received no food by mouth, and all residents on the Rehabilitation Unit and the Secured Care Unit. The facility total census was 91. Findings include:Observations on 02/09/26 at 10:30 P.M. revealed the refrigerator designated for residents on the Secured Care Unit had a lunch bag unlabeled and undated. There were six opened containers of nutritional supplements dated 12/18/25. The refrigerator temperature log had no temperatures logged for the refrigerator from 02/04/26 through 02/08/26. The ice machine ice scoop did not have ice scoop holder and the ice scoop was stored on a table with the dipper side up. There was a wet towel on the floor at the base of the ice machine.Interview on 02/09/26 at 10:30 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #33 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team determined whether a resident was clinically appropriate to self-administer their own medications prior to allowing a resident to self-administer. This affected one (Resident #11) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had moderately impaired cognition.Review of the care plan dated 11/14/18 for Resident #11 revealed the resident had an alteration in respiratory status and to administer medications as ordered; observe labs, and response to medication and treatment. The care plan did not state Resident #11 was able to self-administer any medication.Review of the physician orders dated 01/20/25 for Resident #11…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents with an Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice on Non-coverage (SNF ABN) when their skilled services ended, had skilled days remaining and remained in the facility. This affected two (#31 and #67) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 91.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy and cognitive communication deficit. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the primary payor dated 01/30/26 revealed Resident #31 had Medicare part A. The level of care revealed Resident #31 received skilled services effective 12/22/25 through 02/06/26. On 02/07/26, the payor source changed to MyCare Medicaid [NAME].There was no evidence Resident #31 and/or representative received an SNF ABN when skilled services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, observation, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement Resident #9's care plan interventions for quarter side rails for the resident's bed and develop a mood care plan for Resident #10. The facility census was 91.Findings include- 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, spinal stenosis, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact and was dependent of staff with toileting and bathing, and required supervision with personal hygiene. The care plan dated 08/18/25 revealed Resident #9 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) related to decreased mobility, pain, and self-care deficit. Interventions included a left quarter side rail to assist with bed mobility. Observation and interview on 02/17/26 at 11:00 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to hold quarterly care conferences for the residents. This affected one (#65) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 09/06/23. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis. morbid obesity, paraplegia, and open wound to left lower leg. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #65 was cognitively intact and required supervision with eating, maximum assistance with bed mobility and was dependent upon staff with toileting and transfers.The medical record review revealed the last documentation of a care conference for Resident #65 was on 09/03/24.Interview on 02/10/26 at 9:50 A.M. with Resident #65 revealed she did have a concern because a conference had not been offered for a while.Interview on 02/11/26 at 2:19 P.M. with Social Services Designee (SSD) #14 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review, record review and, staff and resident interviews the facility failed to provide residents, who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), timely assistance with incontinence care and personal hygiene. This affected two (#45 and #65) of two residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility census was 91.Findings include:1) Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed admission date of 01/29/25. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus type two, chronic kidney disease and hypertension. The five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had impaired cognition. Resident #45 was dependent upon staff with toileting hygiene and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #45 required assistance with her ADLs related to a self-care deficit, weakness and decreased mobility. Interventions included for staff to assist with completion with ADLs on a daily basis. Interview on 02/12/26 at 8:55 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure activities were offered and or provided for Resident #65. This affected one (#65) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed admission date of 09/06/23. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, morbid obesity and paraplegia. The care plan revealed Resident #65 was dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social need due to cognitive deficits, physical limitations, legally blind and needs assistance with reading and organizing things, one-to-one (1:1) room visits on scheduled days, and activities were offered when visits being completed. An intervention dated 12/26/23 revealed Resident #65 would be provided 1:1 bedside/in-room visits and activities if unable to attend out of room events.The comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed it was somewhat important to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who had a history of falls had their fall interventions in place. This affected one (Resident #9) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, spinal stenosis, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 was cognitively intact and was dependent of staff with toileting and bathing, and required supervision with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #9's care plan dated 06/19/25 revealed the resident has had an actual fall. Interventions included to ensure a reacher (or also known as a grabber and it is designed to help one with limited mobility or bending restrictions to maintain independence) was accessible to the resident while in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (%). There were six medication errors out of 25 opportunities resulting in a 24% medication error rate. This affected two (#5 and #84) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 91. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included type one diabetes mellitus, underweight, and tachycardia. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. Review of the physician orders dated 02/05/26 revealed Coreg (carvedilol) 12.5 milligrams (mg) give one tablet by mouth two times a day for beta blocker. Observation and interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #66 on 02/11/26 at 10:31 A.M. revealed LPN #66 administered Coreg to Resident #5. LPN #66 confirmed Resident #5's Coreg was ordered to be administered at 9:00 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, policy review, and records reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received their therapeutic diets as physician ordered. This affected two (#17 and #68) of three residents reviewed for therapeutic diets. The facility total census was 91. Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #68 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 had impaired cognition and required maximum assistance from staff with feeding. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #68 was to receive a regular puree thickened liquid diet and provide gravy with all meals. Review of the meal ticket for Resident #68 revealed the resident should have received extra gravy on the side. Observation and interview on 02/12/26 at 8:18 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #109 was feeding Resident #68. There was no extra gravy as a side on or near the resident's meal tray. CNA #10 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-18 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, policy review and records reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents received their adaptive feeding equipment with meals as physician ordered. This affected three (#10, #57, and #79) of three residents reviewed for adaptive equipment. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #79 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included atherosclerosis, diabetes, dementia, and osteoarthritis left shoulder and unspecified pain. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #79 had intact cognition and required set up assistance for feeding. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #79 was to receive a two handled cup with spout lid for liquids.Review of the meal ticket for Resident #79 revealed the resident should have received a two handled cup with a spouted lid.Observation and interview on 02/11/26 at 1:30 P.M. revealed Resident #79 received a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, policy review, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were following Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for high contact care activities with the residents. This affected three (#65, #77, and #84) of three residents reviewed for EBP precautions. The facility census was 91.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 09/06/23. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, stage four pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle.), morbid obesity, and open wound to left lower leg. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #65 had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders dated 06/02/25 revealed EBP were ordered for Resident #65 related to colostomy and wound care. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was to be worn during high contact care activities with a start date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a thorough assessment of a pressure ulcer was completed upon discovery. This affected one (#25) of three residents reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 06/27/24 with diagnoses of dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic venous hypertension (idiopathic) with ulcer of the bilateral lower extremity, peripheral vascular disease, and acquired absence of the left leg below the knee. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 was cognitively intact and required supervision assistance with eating, partial assistance with oral hygiene, and was dependent on staff assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and bed mobility. Review of Resident #25's physician order dated 02/03/25 revealed an order to reduce pressure to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in a safe manner. This affected one (#33) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 04/26/16 with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, anemia, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #33 was independent with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, dressing, bed mobility, and ambulation. Resident #33 required set-up assistance with eating, bathing, and personal hygiene, and required supervision assistance with transfers. Review of the care plan dated 08/11/22 revealed Resident #33 had impaired cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received food in a form to meet individual needs. This affected one (#101) of three residents reviewed for dietary status. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of Resident #101's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/13/25 with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, aphasia, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, and type II diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #101 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment. Resident #101 was dependent on staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident had a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) feeding tube and was not on a mechanically altered or therapeutic diet. Review of Resident #101's admission orders dated 02/13/25 revealed no dietary order was noted. Review of Resident #101's physician order dated 02/13/25 revealed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and review of the Influenza Vaccine Report, the facility failed to offer the annual influenza vaccines to residents. This affected three (#47, #14 and #39) out of three residents reviewed for influenza vaccines and had the potential to affected 80 out of 82 residents residing in the facility, the facility identified two (#16 and #79) residents who were not eligible for the influenza vaccine. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, lumbosacral region, and unspecified dementia, severe, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Further review of Resident #47's medical record revealed there was no documentation the resident was not offered or administered the influenza vaccine for the 2024-2025 influenza season.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as physician ordered. This affected four (#47, #66, #80, and #91) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 12/23/22 with diagnoses of seizures, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, and chronic kidney disease, stage 3 unspecified. Review of the Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 with severe cognitive impairment. Resident #47 required partial assistance with eating and oral hygiene. Resident # 47 required substantial assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, bed mobility, and wheelchair mobility. Review of the September 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR): Levothyroxine Sodium Oral Capsule 25 micrograms (MCG)-give 25 mcg by mouth one time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to initiate treatment for a pressure ulcer in a timely manner. This affected one (#08) of three residents reviewed for wound care and treatment. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed an admission date of 05/04/24 with medical diagnoses of moderate protein calorie malnutrition, diabetes mellitus with neuropathy, hypertension, anxiety, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/06/24, which indicated Resident #08 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene, bathing, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #08 had a stage four pressure ulcer (full-thickness skin and tissue loss) that was not present upon admission. Review of a wound observation assessment, dated 05/30/24, revealed Resident #08 had an unstageable pressure ulcer (obscured full-thickness skin and tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care. This affected one (#53) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 81. Findings Included: Review of medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date 11/02/23. Diagnosis included dementia, psychotic mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was severely cognitively impaired, required partial to moderate assistance for meals, and substantial to maximal assistance for personal hygiene and oral hygiene. Resident #53 was dependent for transfers, bathing, toileting, dressing upper and lower body, and placing shoes on and off. Review of the plan of care dated 08/08/24 revealed Resident #53 was at risk for alteration in elimination due to incontinence. Interventions included to assist with toileting needs daily, keep the call light within reach during toileting, provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control precautions when providing wound care. This affected one (#53) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 11/02/23 with medical diagnoses of dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and hypertension. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/08/24, which indicated Resident #53 had severe cognitive impairment and required partial to moderate staff assistance with meals and was dependent upon staff for transfers, bathing, toileting, and dressing. The MDS assessment indicated Resident #53 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel and Resident #53 had two stage four pressure ulcers (full-thickness skin and tissue loss). Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed a physician order dated 11/03/23 for enhanced barrier…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observations, staff and family interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide podiatry services to a resident. This affected one (#70) of three reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed an admission dated of 07/29/22. Diagnoses listed included type two diabetes mellitus, stage three chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, psychotic disturbance, and macular degeneration. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated revealed staff has assessed Resident #70 as being severely cognitively impaired. Review of a plan of care dated revised 10/23/23 revealed Resident #70 needed assistance with ADL self-performance care due to confusion, dementia, and visual disturbance. Resident #70 was dependent for personal hygiene. Further review of Resident #70's medical record revealed a physician order dated 05/13/21 for may see podiatrist, dentist, audiologist, and ophthalmologist. Review of facility forms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to monitor the water supply to ensure the water could not be contaminated with the Legionella bacterium. This had the potential to affect all 92 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Legionella documentation provided by the facility revealed it contained no documentation related to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) toolkit, completion of a water risk assessment or completion of any water flow diagrams. Interview on 11/14/19 at 1:45 P.M. with Maintenance Supervisor #112 confirmed the facility does not have a water flow diagram, did not complete the CDC toolkit or complete a water risk assessment. Review of the facility policy titled Legionnaires' Disease: Detection, Response, Prevention Policy, undated, revealed the facility will utilize sound clinical and infection control practices to quickly identify and treat any potential Legionnaires' related illnesses. Sound engineering, preventive maintenance and housekeeping practices will be utilized to minimize the risk of exposing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview; the facility failed to ensure advanced directives being stored in the hard chart and electronic health record (EHR) were consistent. This affected three (#26, #40, and #49) of 25 residents reviewed for consistency of advanced directives. The census was 92. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the hard chart for Resident #26 revealed a do not resuscitate (DNR) form dated 06/17/17, which identified the residents code status was DNR comfort care (CC) arrest (A). Review of the EHR for Resident #26 revealed the resident's code status was DNR. 2. Review of the medical record of Resident #40 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the hard chart for Resident #40 revealed a DNR form dated 12/06/17,which identified the residents code status was DNR CC A. Review of the EHR for Resident #40 revealed the residents code status was DNR. 3. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were coded accurately to reflect the resident's current status. This affected four (Residents #3, #53, #58 and #71) of 22 resident MDS reviews completed. The facility census was 92. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 10/09/19. Review of the admission MDS assessment, dated 10/16/19, documented the resident was receiving an anticoagulant medication. Her oral assessment stated she had obvious or likely cavities or broken natural teeth. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and physician orders for October 2019 revealed the resident was receiving an anti-platelet medication, Plavix, not an anti-coagulant. On 11/12/19 at 11:08 A.M. interview with Resident #71 verified she did not have any teeth and had a full set of dentures observed on her bedside table. 2. Record review for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 10/24/19. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screen and Resident Review (PASARR) was accurate upon admission to the facility. This affected one (Resident #71) of three residents reviewed for PASARR assessments. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 10/09/19 with diagnoses including major depression, anxiety and bipolar disorder. Review of PASARR dated 09/19/19 documented the resident had a diagnosis of dementia and no current diagnoses of mental health disorders or psychiatric services received in the past two years. Review of admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/16/19, documented the resident did not have any indications of serious mental illness. She was cognitively intact and had no active diagnosis of dementia. On 11/12/19 at 11:08 A.M. interview with Resident #71 revealed she does not have a diagnosis of dementia and she received psychiatric service prior to admission to the facility by a physiatrist and a therapist. On 11/13/19 at 2:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were completed as ordered per the physician. This affected one (Resident #34) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 08/03/19 with diagnoses including sepsis, cerebral infarction, aphasia, dysphasia, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, anemia in chronic kidney disease, diabetes type two, need for assistance with personal care, vascular dementia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, end stage renal disease (ESRD), dependence on renal dialysis. Review of physician order dated 08/04/19 documented an order for dialysis treatments every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. Review of comprehensive care plan documented Resident #34 has an alteration in kidney function related to ESRD. The goal was to keep lab values within therapeutic range with intervention of the resident's specific dialysis schedule of a chair time of 7:30 A.M. on every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the physcian addressed pharmacy recommendations. This affected one Resident (#3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 92. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE]. Review Resident #3's electronic medical record review revealed pharmacy reviews were completed on 08/20/19, 09/16/19, and 10/02/19. The reviews contained no documentation of what the pharmacist was recommending, just that a review was done. Transition Nurse Specialist (TNS) #130 presented copies of pharmacy recommendations dated 08/20/19, 09/16/19, and 10/02/19 on 11/14/19 at 3:50 P.M. that had been sent form the consultant pharmacy. Review of these pharmacy recommendations revealed on 08/20/19 pharmacy had recommended aspirin be discontinued due to an allergy. On 09/16/19 pharmacy recommended Prozac (anti-depressant) be addressed for an improper diagnosis of insomnia. On 10/0219 pharmacy recommended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor a resident's weights as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #24) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension and stage three chronic kidney disease. Review of a care plan, dated 10/23/18, revealed the resident had impaired cardiovascular status related to the diagnosis of hypertension. The goal was for the resident to be free of symptoms and not have a decline in function related to cardiac condition. Interventions included: daily weights as ordered, notify physician of a two-pound weight gain in one day or five-pound weight gain in three days. Observe and report signs of hypertension such as headaches, flushing, fatigue, blurred vision, shortness of breath. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/09/19, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of Medscape (online medical resource), the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for use of an anti-psychotic medication. This affected one (Resident #58) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 92. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/25/19. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, dementia without behavioral disturbance , Alzheimer's disease, generalized anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 02/25/19 for Zyprexa, anti-psychotic medication, five milligrams (mg) by mouth daily. The diagnoses listed for the use of the medication was depression. Noted with the order was a request for a supporting diagnosis for use of the medication or recommendation for discontinuation of the medication. Review of medication administration records from 02/15/19 through 11/13/19 revealed Resident #58 had received Zyprexa daily since admission. During an interview on 11/13/19 at 3:29…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that after an inadequate blood sample was obtained for a laboratory test, a second blood draw was completed timely. This affected one (Resident #34) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 08/03/19 with diagnoses including sepsis, cerebral infarction, aphasia, dysphasia, muscle weakness, abnormal posture, anemia in chronic kidney disease, diabetes type two, need for assistance with personal care, vascular dementia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, end stage renal disease (ESRD), dependence on renal dialysis. Review of laboratory report dated Saturday, 11/02/19 revealed a laboratory blood test was not completed as the phlebotomist unable to obtain an adequate blood sample. The laboratory was to send another phlebotomist out to draw the blood again. Review of the physcian orders revealed no order for the laboratory test. Review of the nursing notes revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and interview, the facility failed to provided dental services in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #66) of three resident reviewed for dental services. The census was 92. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a dental consult progress note dated 05/17/19 revealed the resident's lower teeth were all decayed. Documentation revealed the resident refused extraction at this time. Review of the care plan updated 05/20/19, revealed Resident #66 was at risk for dental problems related to natural teeth. Documentation revealed the resident complained of mouth pain, was seen by a dentist but refused to have decayed lower teeth extracted. Interventions include refer to dental services as needed. Review of a general progress note dated 09/17/19 at 1:01 P.M., documented by social services, revealed Resident #66 reported complaints of his teeth hurting. The resident was in agreement to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2026-02-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was properly placed inside lidded garbage containers. This had the potential to affect 88 residents. Resident #14, #79, and #103 were on nothing by mouth. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Observation and interview on 02/17/26 at 12:32 P.M. in the kitchen revealed a large garbage bin on wheels with no lid and full of garbage next to a food prep area. There was a garbage bin near a kitchen hand wash station by the freezer and it had garbage sitting on top of the lid, and a garbage bin near hand wash station by kitchen entry doors was full of garbage overflowing, not allowing the lid to close. Kitchen District Manager #120 confirmed there was a garbage bin without a lid, one garbage bin had garbage sitting on the top, and another garbage bin was full of garbage and was overflowing. Review of the facility policy titled Dispose of Garbage and Refuse HCSG 030 revised 02/2025 revealed appropriate lids are provided for all containers and garbage and refuse will be removed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-11-14 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interview and record review, the facility failed to deliver mail to residents on Saturday. This had the potential to affect all residents residing at the facility. The census was 92. Findings include: Interview on 11/13/19 at 1:03 P.M. with Resident #54 revealed mail was not delivered on Saturdays. Interview on 11/13/19 at 1:11 P.M. with Receptionist #123 revealed the post office delivered mail to the facility Monday through Saturday. Receptionist #123 revealed on Monday mornings, Saturday's mail was routinely stacked on the back counter behind the receptionist desk. The receptionist reported Saturdays mail was then sorted on Monday and passed out to any resident who had mail delivered. Interview with Receptionist #123 verified the residents do not get Saturdays mail until Monday, on a routine basis. The facility had no policy related to mail delivery.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCEPTIONAL LIVING CENTERS — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 53.9+1.1 vs chain
The other 9 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MEDICAL REHABILITATION CENTERS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/01/2023
LEXINGTON HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2023
WATTS, AMYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2023
WATTS, WALTERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2023
PETERS, AMANDAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
SINGH, SHACHIIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023
CAMPBELL, BRENDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-37.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$865K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 2%Other / private 23%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $865K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$297per resident / day
operating cost
$9,031per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$216per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365819. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next