Bradford Place Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 59% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 62.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #19 received prompt dental care services. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #19, who had persistent dental pain, developed a dental infection and had significant weight loss. On 06/19/25 at 6:50 P.M., Resident #19, who was nonverbal, screamed loudly for most of the shift due to dental pain and was unable to be redirected. On 06/20/25, Resident #19 ' s oral intake decreased related to ongoing dental pain. Resident #19 was seen by the nursing staff on 06/25/25 for continued behaviors including a decrease in oral intake, biting on her fingers, and was suspected of having a dental infection. Resident #19 was started on Augmentin, an antibiotic, related to a tooth infection. On 07/07/25, Resident #19 continued to have behaviors and had lost weight due to not eating related to dental pain. On 07/15/25, Resident #19 continued to have documented weight loss from decreased oral intake related to dental pain and a dental consultation was ordered. The consult was not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0568 — pattern
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of resident fund accounts, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain resident funds accounts using basic accounting principles and failed to ensure residents received a copy of their resident funds account quarterly statements. This affected six (Residents #2, #4, #27, #32, #47 and #62) of seven residents reviewed for resident funds accounts. The facility census was 66 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 05/23/25 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, and aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 03/05/26 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the quarterly resident funds statement for Resident #2 dated 01/01/26 to 03/31/26 revealed the resident had a beginning balance of $2270.97 and an ending balance of $1888.16. There was a debit for a purchase from an online retailer of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0569 — pattern
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of resident funds accounts, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify residents that received Medicaid benefits or their representatives when the amount in the resident's resident funds account reached $200 less than the supplemental security income (SSI) resource limit. This affected six (Residents #2, #4, #27, #32, #47 and #62) of seven residents reviewed for resident funds accounts. The facility census was 66 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 05/23/25 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, and aphasia. Resident #2's payor source was Medicaid. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 03/05/26 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the quarterly resident funds statement for Resident #2 dated 01/01/26 to 03/31/26 revealed the resident had a beginning balance of $2270.97 and an ending balance of $1888.16. There was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of resident fund account records, ,staff interview, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure money was not misappropriated from resident funds accounts and items were not purchased using resident funds without authorization. This affected five (Resident #2, #4, #27, #32, and #62) of seven residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident funds. The facility census was 66 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 05/23/25 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, and aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 03/05/26 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the quarterly resident funds statement for Resident #2 dated 01/01/26 to 03/31/26 revealed the resident had a beginning balance of $2270.97 and an ending balance of $1888.16. There was a debit for a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of resident fund accounts, resident interview, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to timely report allegations of misappropriation of resident funds. This affected five (Residents #2, #0, #27, #32, and #62) of seven residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident funds. The facility census was 66 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 05/23/25 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, and aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 03/05/26 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the quarterly resident funds statement for Resident #2 dated 01/01/26 to 03/31/26 revealed the resident had a beginning balance of $2270.97 and an ending balance of $1888.16. There was a debit for a purchase from an online retailer of $62.21 on 01/29/26 and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of resident fund accounts, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRIs), staff interview, resident interview, review of employee records, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of misappropriation including investigating thoroughly investigating all alleged perpetrators. This affected five (Residents #2, #4, #27, #32, and #62) of seven residents reviewed for misappropriation of resident funds. The facility census was 66 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 05/23/25 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, Alzheimer's disease, and aphasia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #2 dated 03/05/26 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the quarterly resident funds statement for Resident #2 dated 01/01/26 to 03/31/26 revealed the resident had a beginning balance of $2270.97 and an ending balance of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of emergency medical services (EMS) run report, staff interview, EMS interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident do not resuscitate comfort care (DNRCC) orders were implemented appropriately. This affected one (Resident #67) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 66 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 02/27/26 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, type two diabetes mellitus, and encephalopathy and a discharge date of 04/12/26. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #67 revealed an order dated 03/02/26 indicating the resident's code status was do not resuscitate comfort care (DNRCC). Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed it did not include a DNRCC form Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #67 dated 03/05/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was served in an appetizing manner. This affected two (Residents #86 and #16) and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 75 residents. Findings include: Observation on 09/23/25 at 12:15 P.M. of a test tray revealed there were two tacos wrapped in foil with liquid pooled up underneath the plate. There was a significant amount of liquid contained within the foil and the tortilla of the taco was saturated with liquid. Interview on 09/23/25 at 12:16 P.M. with District Manager (DM) #600 verified there was liquid in the foil which altered the texture of the tortillas. Observation on 09/23/25 at 12:25 P.M. revealed Resident #86 attempted to eat the tacos on his lunch tray. The tortillas were wet and soggy and the resident had difficulty eating the tacos.Interview on 09/23/25 on 12:26 P.M. with Resident #86 confirmed the taco tortillas were wet and soggy and he could not eat them.Interview on 09/23/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-25 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — widespread
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure beverage preferences and requests were honored. This affected one (Resident #16) of one residents reviewed for food preferences and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 75 residents.Findings include: Observation on 09/22/25 at 11:46 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #525 entered Resident #16's room to deliver a lunch tray. Resident #16 asked CNA #525 for milk. CNA #525 stated there was no milk in the refrigerator, but otherwise she would give it to him. Interview on 09/22/25 at 11:47 A.M. with CNA #525 verified Resident #16 asked for milk and she told him it was not available. CNA #525 confirmed she did not go look for the milk or call the kitchen for the milk and further stated if the resident was supposed to have it, it would have been on his tray. Interview on 09/23/25 at 3:24 P.M. with Resident #16 verified he did not get the milk he requested at lunch the day prior. Resident #16…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, served and stored in a manner to protect against the potential spread of foodborne illness. This affected one (Resident #10) and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 75 residents. Findings include: Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, served and stored in a manner to protect against the potential spread of foodborne illness. This affected one (Resident #10) and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 75 residents. Findings include: 1.Observation on 09/23/25 at 11:50 A.M. revealed [NAME] #701 prepared trays for the lunch meal on tray line. [NAME] #701 placed a scoop of cooked peppers and onions onto a plate. [NAME] #701 used his bare fingers to pick up a piece of onion which was hanging over the edge of the plate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-25 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the Resident Council meeting minutes, the facility failed to respond and address resident concerns expressed in the Resident Council meetings. This affected five (#56, #14, #44, #39 and #67) of the five residents interviewed during Resident Council meeting. The facility total census was 75.Findings included: Record Review of Resident #56 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #56 include anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment for Resident #56 dated 07/02/25, revealed the resident had intact cognition.Record review of Resident #14 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #14 Alzheimer's disease. Review of the MDS comprehensive assessment for Resident #14 dated 09/10/25, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition.Record review of Resident #44 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-24 for 35 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to EXCEPTIONAL LIVING CENTERS — 10 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $703K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH