Ranch House Senior Living LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 37.2 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.28 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.77 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.55 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.38 to 1.04 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 50 residents, with 13 residents included in the sample, including two residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a fall with fracture for cognitively impaired Resident (R)35 when staff did not assess for the safe use of an electric lift chair. On 07/15/23, staff found R35 on the floor in front of her fully raised electric lift chair and required transfer to the emergency room where R35 was diagnosed with a fractured (broken) clavicle (collar bone). The facility further failed to implement the immediate fall prevention intervention related to the fall with fracture, for at least 10 days, when staff did not remove the electronic lift chair, leaving the resident at risk for continued falls from the chair. Findings included: - R35's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), fracture to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 36 residents. The 12 sampled residents included three dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide bathing opportunities and grooming of facial hair in accordance with the residents' preferred bathing schedule to ensure necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for Resident (R)5 and R9. This placed the residents at risk for impaired dignity and poor hygiene. Findings included: - A review of R5's undated Physician Orders, (POS), included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. He exhibited fluctuating behaviors of inattention and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 36 residents, with 12 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and implement measures consistent with in accordance with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of and promote the healing of pressure ulcers for Resident (R) 34 when staff failed to ensure R34's heels were offloaded and failed to develop a consistent repositioning plan. The facility further failed to ensure R24 received the required interventions including a low air loss mattress to prevent pressure ulcers. This placed the residents at risk for the development of new pressure ulcers, delayed healing, and worsening of existing ulcers. Findings included: - R34's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of pneumococcal arthritis of the right and left knees (a condition where…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 36 residents with 12 residents in the sample and seven residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards for two residents. The facility failed to complete an investigation to determine causative factors and implement interventions to prevent further falls for Resident (R) 24. This failure placed the affected resident at risk for further falls, accidents, and related injuries. Findings included: - R24's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and depression. The 06/28/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R24 required maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) including bed mobility, standing, and transfers. R24 required supervision for ambulation for 10 feet. The MDS documented R24 had one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 36 residents, with 12 residents selected for review which included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents remained free from unnecessary medications when the facility failed to follow physician orders related to blood pressure monitoring and related parameters for three residents, Resident (R)10, R25, and R9. This placed the resident at risk for adverse medication effects. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Health Records (EHR) recorded an undated Physician Orders (POS) that documented diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) and hypertension (high blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The Functional Abilities (Self Care Mobility) Care Area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 36 residents with 12 residents selected for review which included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete an industry-accepted assessment for abnormal movements related to antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) use for Resident (R) 24 who received Zyprexa (antipsychotic). This deficient practice placed the affected resident at risk for adverse effects associated with the use of psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. Findings include: - R24's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and depression. The 06/28/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated severely impaired cognition. R24 required maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) including bed mobility,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 45 residents. The sample included 15 residents reviewed for misappropriation and exploitation. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1 remained free from misappropriation of funds, when housekeeping staff I exploited the resident of approximately $100.00. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for a negative psychosocial impact in safety and security. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), depression (an abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), anxiety (a disorder characterized by chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility census totaled 50 residents with one central kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare and serve foods safely and in a sanitary manner which included failure to date and reseal open food items in the refrigerator and freezer; failure to clean and disinfect the food thermometer while taking the temperature of food items; and failure to use gloves appropriately when handling/serving of food. This had the potential to affect all 50 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings Included: - On 07/25/23 at 12:30 PM, initial tour of the kitchen revealed the following items: The walk-in refrigerator contained a raw meat patty in a baggie with no identification of what it was or a date; cooked hamburger patties in separate bags undated; an open package of cheese slices undated; a partially sliced onion in an open bag undated; and two separate packages of corn tortillas not dated and with visible mold growing on the tortillas. The freezer contained an open bag of French fries and an open bag of tater tots with no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-31 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a quality assessment and assurance committee that consisted at the minimum of the director of nursing services, the medical director or his/her designee, at least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of who must be the administrator, owner, board member or other individual in a leadership role, and the infection preventionist, as required. Findings included: - Review of the facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) sign in sheets, revealed a lack of documentation of the Infection Preventionist in attendance from July 2022 until current. In addition, the February 2023 and April 2023 lacked the required members for the QAPI meeting when only the facility's medical director and the facility administrator were the only members in attendance. On 07/31/23 at 01:46 PM, Administrative staff A reported he did not know the Infection Preventionist was to attend the QAPI meetings. The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance improvement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 50 residents with 13 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when they failed to provide safe and sanitary care for one Resident (R) 20, regarding his urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag), for R3, in regards to incontinent care, R2 in regards to failure to change gloves from dirty to clean during wound care, and failure to change gloves in the kitchen who served food to all of the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Resident (R)20's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented the resident had diagnoses that included chronic kidney failure, stage three, frequency of micturition (frequency of bladder), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency and urinary tract infections. The 06/23/23 Annual Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-07-31 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 50 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an in-service training program for nurses' aides that was appropriate and effective to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides. Four of five current certified nurse aide records reviewed for the required annual in-service trainings revealed the lack of dementia management training, resident abuse prevention training, and/or social media training, out of the 12 required in-service trainings, to ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides and appropriate care and services to all the residents of the facility. Findings included: - During the survey, review of five certified nurse aides' in-service records revealed four of the five, lacked all 12 required trainings as follows: 1. Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) P lacked dementia management training, resident abuse prevention training, and/or social media training. 2. CNA Q lacked dementia management training, resident abuse prevention training, and/or social media training. 3. CNA R lacked dementia management…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MIDWEST HEALTH — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS