Holiday Resort Of Salina
2825 Resort Drive, Salina, KS 67401 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 60 certified beds · (785) 825-2201 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,795 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-04)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.2% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.8% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.4% | 6.5% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 18.1% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.1% | 23.2% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.4% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.3% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.7% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.7% | 18.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.3% | 1.9% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.0% | 73.8% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.6% | 22.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.6% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.42 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
57.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 127 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 57.0%CMS range 46.0–65.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.9%CMS range 9.7–17.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 91.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.7–13.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 37.8 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.82 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 40 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from significant medication errors when staff administered ten times the ordered dose of morphine sulfate (opioid pain medication) on three separate occasions. Resident (R)1 admitted to the facility for a Hospice respite stay on [DATE]. On [DATE] the facility received an order for morphine sulfate oral solution 10 milligrams (mg)/5 milliliters (ml), give 2.5 ml (5 mg) by mouth two times a day for pain management. The facility received a bottle of morphine concentrate 100 mg/5 ml from the pharmacy. Facility nursing staff administered and R1 received three 2.5 ml doses of the morphine, equaling 50 mg of morphine per dose (45 mg more than ordered) on three occasions: [DATE] in the 06:00-10:00 AM medication pass and at 08:00 PM in the Midnight medication pass, and again on [DATE] in the 06:00-10:00 AM medication pass. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided consistent bathing and/or showers for five sampled residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL), Resident (R) 1, R2, R3, R4, and R5. Findings included:- 1. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 04/09/26, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 1 to direct staff to provide R1 services for R1 to attain or maintain her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 04/09/26, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow R1's primary care physician's orders to obtain a straight catheterization urine specimen to assess for a urinary tract infection. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 04/09/26, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R1 had impairment on both sides of her upper and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included five residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the physician ordered medications for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 1. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for ineffective treatment of HIV (Human Immunodeficiency virus, a virus that attacks the body's immune system, leading to a weakened immune system and increase in the risk for cancers and infections). Findings included:- R1's electronic health record (EHR) documented diagnoses of HIV, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), fractured sternum (a long flat T-shaped bone located in the center of the chest wall that protects the heart and other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included five residents. Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to correctly transcribe physician orders to provide medication to Resident (R) 1 and R2, upon admission to the facility. This deficient practice caused R1 to not receive his prescription medication for 13 days and R2 to not receive the prescribed medication for four weeks. Findings included: - R1's electronic health record (EHR) documented diagnoses of HIV (Human Immunodeficiency virus, a virus that attacks the body's immune system, leading to a weakened immune system and increase in the risk for cancers and infections), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), fractured sternum (a long flat T-shaped bone located in the center of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to correctly prepare a pureed (a texture-modified diet where all foods are blended or mashed into a smooth, pudding-like consistency) diet for Resident (R) 8. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition.Findings included:- On 07/08/25 at 11:30 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB prepared one pureed diet. DS BB placed one serving, approximately three ounces of baked barbecued rib patty in a food processor/blender. DS BB blended the barbecued rib patty, added an unmeasured amount of meat juice, blended to the correct pureed texture, and emptied the barbecued meat into a stainless-steel food storage container, then placed the steel food container in the oven. Continued observation revealed DS BB placed approximately four ounces of cauliflower and broccoli in a food processor/blender. DS BB blended the vegetables to the correct pureed texture and emptied the vegetables into a stainless-steel food storage container,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 45 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a sanitary manner when dietary staff did not complete hair coverage with the hairnet and beard cover. This deficient practice placed the residents of the facility who received meals from the facility at risk for foodborne illness.Findings included:- On 07/08/25 at 11:40 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB in the facility kitchen preparing Resident (R) 8's pureed lemon bar dessert. DS BB wore a beard net but did not cover his entire beard or mustache, and had a hair net that did not cover the back of his hair. On 07/09/25 at 11:45 AM, observation revealed DS EE in the facility kitchen preparing to serve the residents' lunch food trays to the tables. DS EE wore a beard net but did not cover his entire beard or mustache, and had a hair net that did not cover the back of his hair.On 07/09/25 at 12:00 PM, observation revealed the stove hood with brownish gray fuzz substance covered and hanging from the front panel of the stove top…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that its Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee adequately identified deficient areas of practice and to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to correct the deficient practices for the 45 residents residing in the facility.Findings included:- Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify, document the clinical rationale for administering R5, an antipsychotic medication, when staff failed to understand the resident's wants and needs due to a language barrier. Refer to F605.Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman and provide a bed hold policy when R32 was transferred to the hospital. Refer to F628. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for R5 regarding communication, dementia care, and antipsychotic use for behaviorsRefer to 656.Based on observation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample includes 13 residents, with five residents reviewed for immunizations: Resident (R) 6, R8, R25, R26, and R33, to include pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) vaccinations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to offer, obtain an informed declination or a physician documented contraindication for the pneumococcal PCV20 vaccination per the latest guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This placed the residents at risk for pneumococcal infection and related complications.Findings included:- Review of R6, R8, R25, R23, and R33 clinical medical records lacked evidence that the facility or the resident representative received or signed a consent to receive or informed declination for the pneumococcal vaccine PCV20.Review of R6's electronic health record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6 had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure and maintain the kitchen walk-in freezer was in a safe operating condition, as the freezer door would build up with ice and would not completely shut. This placed the 45 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the facility's kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.Findings included:- On 07/07/25 08:20 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the walk-in freezer door had ice buildup on the frame of the door and was hard to keep closed.On 07/07/25 at 12:14 PM, Maintenance Staff (MS) U stated he was aware of the problems with the walk-in freezer door building up with ice and not shutting. MS U stated he had talked to six or seven refrigeration vendors, and they could only do part of what needed to be fixed in the walk-in freezer. MS U stated about a year ago that the food in the freezer had to be thrown away due to the out-of-range…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident, Resident (R) 5 was free from antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication without an appropriate indication for use. The facility failed to ensure the physician provided the risk versus benefit for the continued use of antipsychotic medications. This placed R5 at risk of unnecessary medication administration and related complications.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R5 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbances (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a Bed Hold Notification and State Ombudsman Agency notification of Resident (R) 32's discharge from the facility. This placed R32 at risk for being uninformed.Findings included:- R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting the left non-dominant side, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), obesity (excessive body fat), nicotine dependence, cigarettes, lymphedema (tissue swelling caused by accumulation of protein rich fluid),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan with individualized, resident-centered interventions for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) care, behaviors, and communication for one resident, Resident (R) 5. This placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R5 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbances (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made or the boy cannot respond to the insulin).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for communication. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement alternative communication methods for one resident, Resident (R) 5, who spoke Spanish. This placed the resident at risk for unmet needs, frustration, and agitation.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R5 documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) without behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the boy cannot respond to the insulin).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R5 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R5 required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with 4 reviewed for bathing. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide consistent bathing services for two residents, Resident (R) 6 and R8. This placed the residents at risk for complications related to poor hygiene.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R6 recorded diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS - progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), heart failure, dementia without behavioral disturbance (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R6 had moderately impaired cognition. R6 was independent for eating, oral hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene, mobility, and transfers. R6 required substantial staff assistance with bathing. R6's Care Plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident (R) 32, who smoked and had a staff-assisted descent to the ground while being assisted with a chair-to-chair transfer. This placed R32 at risk for injuries from smoking and falls.Included findings:- R32's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting the left non-dominant side, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), obesity (excessive body fat), nicotine dependence, cigarettes, lymphedema (tissue swelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for dementia (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized dementia treatment plan for one resident, Resident (R) 5, who had dementia and received psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication. This placed R5 at risk for decreased quality of life.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R5 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R5 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of blood sugars (a system which measures blood glucose in the body) outside of ordered parameters for one resident, Resident (R) 20. This placed the residents at risk for adverse effects related to medication.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R20 documented diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R20 had moderately impaired cognition. R20 required substantial assistance from staff for upper body dressing, personal hygiene, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for Hospice (specialized care that mainly aims to provide comfort and dignity to the patients by providing physical comfort and emotional, social, and spiritual support for people nearing the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R) 5 and R2. This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate and/or unmet end-of-life care.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R5 documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) without behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included eleven residents with eleven residents reviewed for residents right to dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect Resident (R) 1's dignity when R1 put on his call light because he had to have a bowel movement and a Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) came into his room turned off his call light, stated she would be right back, and did not return to R1's room for two hours. R1 was incontinent of bowel in bed. This deficient practice placed the R1 at risk for impaired dignity and psychosocial impairment. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and severe obesity. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 09/06/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included eleven residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided consistent bathing and/or showers for three residents, Resident (R)1, R3, and R11. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for impaired dignity, infection, and alteration in skin integrity. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that R1 had diagnoses of spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and severe obesity. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 09/06/24, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R1 had impairment on both sides of his lower extremities and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, dressing, and transfer and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 44 residents. The facility identified six residents with COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus) in the facility. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection when reusable equipment was not disinfected between resident use and/or storage in common areas. The facility further failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M informed the facility he had COVID-19 symptoms and tested positive for COVID-19. This placed the resident's at risk for infection. Findings included: - The facility's COVID-19 staff infection log documented CNA M tested positive for the virus on 11/29/23 but had symptoms that started on 11/23/23. The staffing sheet for the dates of 11/23/23, 11/24/23, and 12/01/23 documented CNA M worked the evening shift. The COVID-19 resident infection log documented 26 residents since 11/17/23 were ill with COVID-19. On 12/07/23 at 02:00 PM, observation revealed Administrative Nurse D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure the kitchen walk-in freezer was in safe operating condition, when the freezer door continued to build up with ice and fail to completely shut. This placed the 41 residents who resided in the facility and received their meals from the facility kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 11/01/23 at 08:30AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the walk-in freezer door had ice buildup on the frame of the door and would not stay closed. On 11/06/23 at 12:40 PM, Maintenance Staff (MS) U stated he had been employed at the facility for six years and he was aware of the problems with the walk-in freezer door building up with ice and not shutting. MS U verified the issue had been going on for quite a while. MS U stated he had talked to six or seven refrigeration vendors and turned in the price to replace the freezer, but the problem had not yet received a permanent fix. On 11/06/23 at 02:46 PM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise, update, and individualize the care plans for Resident (R) 9 who received oxygen and respiratory treatment, R13 with a urinary catheter (tube inserted in the bladder to drain urine), R24 who received insulin (a hormone to regulate blood sugar) and a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), R25 who was on a fluid restriction, and R19 and R22 who were at risk for falls. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for inadequate and/or inappropriate care related to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The Quarterly Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards with staff left one of two treatment carts unsupervised and unlocked in the hall by the living room area. This placed the six cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents at risk for preventable accidents or injuries. Finding included: - On 11/02/23 at 08:18 AM, observation revealed a treatment cart unlocked and unsupervised. The cart contained the following items: The first drawer had a pair of scissors, numerous rolls of tape, one (1.5 fluid ounce) bottle antiseptic cleanser and a 22-gauge needle. The second drawer had four boxes of medicated arthritis pain gel, three boxes of albuterol sulfate (0.83 %) inhalation solution (breathing treatment), two tubes of medicated triamcinolone acetonide cream (medication used to treat a variety of skin conditions), two boxes of Spiriva (breathing treatment) one box of ipratropium bromide inhaler (medication used to open airways), one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for dialysis (procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to adhere to Resident (R) 25's fluid restriction, placing R25 at risk for fluid overload, and dialysis complications. Findings included: - R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnosis of stage 4 chronic kidney disease (advanced kidney disease), and dependence on dialysis. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R25 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further documented R25 required minimal assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). R25 was able to feed herself. She received dialysis three times a week. The Dehydration/Hydration Care Area Assessment Summary (CAA), dated 09/06/23, stated R25 received dialysis three times a week and was on a fluid restriction…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents, of which two were reviewed for behaviors. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to attain Resident (R) 23's highest practicable mental and psychosocial (interrelation of social factors and individual thought and behavior) well-being when staff failed to provide R23 with mental and behavioral health services. This placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of care and life. Findings included: - R23's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R23 had diagnoses of trigeminal neuralgia (chronic painful disease which affects the trigeminal nerves present in the face)and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness). R23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R23 had short- and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident was dependent on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 12 residents, of which two were reviewed for behaviors. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate medical social services to meet Resident (R) 23's mental and behavioral health needs. This placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of care and life. Findings included: - R23's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R23 had diagnoses trigeminal neuralgia (chronic painful disease which affects the trigeminal nerves present in the face) and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness). R23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R23 had short- and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented the resident was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADLs) and had behaviors of inattention, altered level of consciousness which fluctuated, and disorganized thinking which were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-13 · tag F0576 — patternEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to deliver mail in a timely manner which included Saturday. This placed the residents at risk to not receive their communications in a timely manner. Findings included: -On 04/11/22 at 08:52 AM, observation revealed a box labeled Saturday Mail in the entry commons space of the facility containing several envelopes and a paper flyer. On 04/11/22 at 08:52 AM, Administrative Staff A reported the mail was delivered on 04/09/22 and had not been distributed to the residents. Administrative Staff A stated it was the nursing staff's responsibility to deliver the Saturday mail. The facility's undated admission Agreement Resident Rights policy documented the facility must protect and facilitate that resident's right to communicate with individuals and entities within and external to the facility, including reasonable access to stationery, postage, writing implements, and the ability to send mail. The facility failed to ensure the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to correctly prepare a pureed diet for six residents, Resident (R)17, R15, R26, R19, R30 and R33. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 04/11/22 at 10:30 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff (DS) BB prepared six pureed diets. DS BB placed approximately four slices, approximately three ounces of baked meat loaf in a food processor/blender. DS BB blended the meatloaf, added an unmeasured amount of beef broth, emptied the meatloaf into a stainless-steel food storage container, then stored the container in the oven. DS BB placed approximately two- and one-half cups of peas in a blender with some juice, blended the peas, emptied the peas into a stainless-steel food storage container, and placed the container in the oven. On 04/11/22 at 11:00 AM, DS BB stated she was unaware she needed to follow a pureed recipe and stated she would blend the food and add the unmeasured amount of liquid to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide assistance at mealtime for dependent Resident (R) 139, who had a history of a 7.6 percent weight loss in one month. This placed the resident at risk for continued weight loss. Findings included: -R139's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 02/28/22, documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), facial weakness following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ruptured blood vessel causing bleeding inside the brain), aftercare following surgery for malignant neoplasm (cancer tumor) of frontal lobe (brain), mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R139 had intact cognition, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 16 residents with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). The facility failed to prevent the development of a Stage 2 pressure ulcer (partial thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red pink wound bed) for Resident (R) 20 and R17. This placed the residents at risk for further skin breakdown, pain, and skin infection. Findings included: - R20's Physician Order Sheet, dated 02/01/22, recorded a diagnosis of morbid obesity (a person is at least 100 pounds overweight), venous insufficiency peripheral (failure of the veins to adequately circulate blood, especially in the lower extremities), kidney disease Stage 3 (the kidney's have mild to moderate damage, and they are less able to filter waste and fluid out of the blood), and depression (abnormal emotional state…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility has a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for urinary catheter. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 25's urinary catheter system (tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) had not touched the floor. This placed R25 at risk for urinary tract infections (UTI - infection in the bladder or kidneys). Findings included: - R25's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 03/01/22, recorded diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and muscle weakness of one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction (stoke), malignant neoplasm (cancer tumor) of prostate, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and vascular dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R25 had moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide routine weight monitoring for Resident (R) 139, who had a history of a 7.6 percent weight loss in one month. This placed the resident at risk for delayed identification and interventions to prevent further loss weight loss. Findings included: - R139's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 02/28/22, documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), facial weakness following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ruptured blood vessel causing bleeding inside the brain), aftercare following surgery for malignant neoplasm (cancer tumor) of frontal lobe (brain), mild protein-calorie malnutrition, and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness) . The admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure staff possessed adequate competencies to store, prepare, and secure medication and medical information during medication pass. This placed residents at risk of compromised medications and exposure of medical information. Findings included: -On 04/13/22 at 07:30 AM, observation revealed an unattended medication cart on the 300 Hall with a clear plastic medication cup with several pills of a variety of color and shapes on the top of the cart. The electronic medication administration record (eMAR) was visible on a computer screen which contained information related to a resident's medical record. Licensed Nurse (LN) G emerged from Resident (R) 24's room, approached the medication cart and minimized the computer screen. LN G took the medication cup containing the various colors and shapes into R24's room, leaving the medication cart unlocked and out of visual range of the nurse. LN G then proceeded to prepare R139's medication for administration.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, of which five were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist identified and reported to the Director of Nursing, medical director, and physician, the inappropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing and other mental emotional conditions) for one of five residents, Resident (R) 137. This placed the resident at risk for inappropriate use of an antipsychotic medication. Findings included: - R137's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) disease and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with behavioral disturbance. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents, of which five were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to obtain an appropriate diagnosis for Resident (R) 137's use of an antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing and other mental emotional conditions) medication. This placed the resident at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic (medications that affect a person's mental state) medication. Findings included: - R137's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure) disease and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with behavioral disturbance. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R137 had severe cognitive impairment, inattention which fluctuated, delusions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-13 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for dental care. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide timely dental care for one sampled resident, Resident R (20). This placed R20 at risk for pain, dietary concerns, and dental issues. Findings included: - R20's Physician Order Sheet, dated 02/01/22, recorded diagnoses of morbid obesity (a person is at least 100 pounds overweight), venous insufficiency peripheral (failure of the veins to adequately circulate blood, especially in the lower extremities), kidney disease Stage 3 (the kidney's have mild to moderate damage, and they are less able to filter waste and fluid out of the blood), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness and hopelessness). R20's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions for Resident (R) 18 and R9 during the meal service. This placed the residents at risk for contaminated food. Findings included: - On 04/11/22 at 12:20 PM, during the meal service, observation revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N in the main dining room took a spoon and a knife and cut up R18's hamburger into quarters. The resident did not pick up the hamburger. CNA N picked up the quarter pieces of hamburger with her bare hand and put it up to R18's mouth to assist her to eat the meal. CNA N did this a few times during the meal service. On 04/11/22 at 12:30 PM, during the meal service, observation revealed CNA N went from the table she was assisting R18 to the hydration bar and got two cups and delivered the drinks to R9's table. CNA N then removed the paper from the two straws with her bare hands, touched the bendable straw tip the resident would drink from, and placed the straws into the two cups in front of the resident. R9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-07-09 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the actual scheduled hours worked for nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. This placed the residents at risk of being uninformed of nursing staff hours.Findings included:- On 07/07/25 at 08:10 AM, upon entrance into the facility, the Daily Nurse Staffing Report was observed posted on the desk pillars on the North side of the nurse's station, dated 07/06/25 and indicated a census of 45 residents. On 07/08/25 at 07:30 AM, observation revealed the facility lacked a Daily Nurse Staffing Report.On 07/09/25 at 08:10 AM, Nurse Consultant GG verified it was the night shift's responsibility to make sure the Daily Nurse Staffing Report was posted for the current day. Nurse Consultant GG verified on 07/07/25 that the facility had posted a schedule dated 07/06/25, and on 07/08/25, the facility lacked a nursing staffing schedule posting for part of the day. The facility's Daily Nursing Staff Posting policy, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2022-04-13 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the actual scheduled hours worked for nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. This placed the residents at risk to be uninformed of nursing staff hours. Findings included: - On 04/11/22 at 07:30 AM, upon entrance into the facility, the daily nurse staffing report was observed posted on the wall outside of the living room in the commons area, dated 04/10/22 and indicated a census of 40 residents. On 04/12/22 at 07:30 AM, observation revealed the daily nurse staffing report dated 04/10/22. On 04/12/22 at 03:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified it was the night shifts responsibility to make sure the daily nurse staffing report was posted for the current day and verified on 04/11/22 and 04/12/22 the facility had the posted schedule dated 04/10/22. The facility's Daily Nursing Staff Posting policy, dated 11/28/17, documented the facility would post the full-time equivalent number personnel responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,795 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $16,795 — penalty dated 2023-10-04
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MIDWEST HEALTH — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 3.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOLIDAY RESORT OF SALINA OPERATIONS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 06/26/2003 |
| FLOYD C EATON III TRUST 2012 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/21/2024 |
| HOLIDAY RESORT OF SALINA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/26/2003 |
| JAMES BRETT KLAUSMAN TRUST 2012 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/21/2024 |
| JAMIE N EATON TRUST 2012 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/26/2003 |
| KLATON HOLDINGS COMPANY INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/26/2003 |
| MICHAEL GRAHAM KLAUSMAN TRUST 2012 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 11/21/2024 |
| EATON, FLOYD | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/26/2003 |
| KLAUSMAN, JAMES | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2025 |
| MIDWEST HEALTH, INC. 06122001 | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/26/2003 |
| HUYGHEBAERT, MARC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2026 |
| KUNTZSCH, NICOLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/04/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175423. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.