Pioneer Ridge Retirement Community
4851 Harvard Road, Lawrence, KS 66049 · For profit - Partnership · 76 certified beds · (785) 749-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Dec 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $29,286 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-01)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.2% | 17.9% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.5% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.4% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.7% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.6% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.7% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.3% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.9% | 23.2% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.6% | 95.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.9% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.4% | 18.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.9% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.5% | 73.8% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.9% | 22.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.1% | 11.5% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.85 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.75 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 207 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 49.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 128 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.8%CMS range 58.2–70.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.0–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 49.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 23.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.6–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.73 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 59.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.60 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to respond appropriately to alarms to prevent the elopement of Resident (R) 1, who was cognitively impaired, had a history of wandering and exit seeking, and was at risk for falls. On 04/26/26 at 01:44 AM, R1 pushed on the Blue-Hall emergency exit door, which sounded the alarm immediately when pushed, then opened after 15 seconds, and R1 exited the facility. Licensed Nurse (LN) G sat at the nurse's station with a clear view of the emergency exit door but did not look up or respond to the door alarm. At 02:05 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M approached the nurse's station and asked LN G where the alarm was coming from, and LN G stated it was likely an exit door. CNA M and CNA N immediately started looking for the source of the alarm. They identified Blue-hall emergency exit door as the source and shortly after, LN G heard knocking on a door near the nurse's station and instructed CNA M and CNA N to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 61 residents, with 9 sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the staff provided Resident (R) 1 a peanut-free meal, per his reported allergies upon admission. On 03/07/25 at 06:30 PM, the staff provided R1 a peanut butter cookie with his dinner and the staff failed to verify his documented allergies on his meal ticket. R1 had an anaphylaxis allergic reaction to the peanut butter that resulted in vomiting. The facility could not provide epinephrine to R1 to prevent further potential anaphylaxis-related symptoms and the facility transferred R1 to the hospital. R1 received the epinephrine at the hospital and was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for anaphylaxis. This deficient practice placed R1 in immediate jeopardy and any resident with a food allergy at risk to their health and safety. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-03 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) were reviewed for yearly performance evaluations and in-service training. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of the five reviewed CNA staff had the required yearly performance evaluations completed. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate care.Findings included: - Review of the facility's performance evaluation and in-service records revealed the following:CNA N, hired 09/30/23, had no yearly performance evaluations provided upon request.On 12/03/25 at 09:30 AM, Administrator A stated the facility did not have a performance evaluation for CNA N.On 12/03/25 at 02:43 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that yearly evaluations were completed on all direct care staff. He stated the evaluations were used to gauge performance and identify areas of needed improvement for direct care staff.The facility's Staffing policy, dated 06/2017, indicated performance reviews will be conducted on each employee at least annually to identify employee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The facility had one main kitchen and two dining areas. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff members properly tested the dishwashing sanitization chemicals documented freezer and refrigerate temperatures. The facility also failed to staff donned hairnets and beard guards and maintain dairy food at the appropriate temperature. Findings included:- During the initial tour of the kitchen and dining room area on 12/01/25 at 07:10 AM, an open undated gallon of milk sat in a brown tub without ice. Dietary Staff EE tempted the open milk, which was 46 degrees. The Milk was discarded. Dietary Staff EE lacked a hairnet when setting up the breakfast serving line. Dietary Staff CC carried two juice glasses, touching the tops of the glasses where the resident would drink from. On 12/01/25 at 07:45 AM, review of the Low Temperature Sanitizing Dish Machine Log, Refrigerator Temperature Log, and the Freezer Temperature Log for November 2025 revealed the following ten days lacked documentation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The facility identified nine residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms, which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). The facility failed to identify Resident (R) 74, who had a percutaneous endoscope gastrostomy tube (PEG- a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach), and R1, R21, R48, and R6, who had a urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement signage or indicators within the physical environment to alert staff and visitors of the required EBP. The facility further failed to store oxygen nasal canula in a sanitary manner, the facility further failed to ensure staff performed adequate hand hygiene, and further failed to ensure Accu-check (blood glucose monitoring test) had a barrier placed prior to being laid down in a resident's room.Findings included:-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement the core elements of antibiotic stewardship to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program including antibiotic stewardship for the residents of the facility. Findings included:- On 12/02/25, requested the infection control log for tracking and trending infections from December 2024 through October 2025. The facility was unable to provide an infection control log for the following months December 2024, June 2025, July 2025, August 2025, September 2025, and October 2025 that included evidence of tracking and identifications of possible infection outbreaks at the facility, lacked consistent identification of infection, the antibiotic administration and the of continent documentation of the infection control surveillance. On 12/02/25 at 02:25 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated he is responsible for tracking and trending for the antibiotic use in the facility. He stated he had not completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-03 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to designate a staff member with the required qualification and certification as the Infection Preventionist, who was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. Findings included:- On 12/02/25 at 02:25 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated the nurse listed as the Infection Preventionist was a corporate nurse who would answer questions and give advice as needed, but was not at the facility. Administrative Nurse D stated he was responsible for the Infection Prevention and Control Program. He stated he had not completed a specialized education for the monitoring of the Infection Preventionist. The facility was unable to provide a policy related to the Infection Preventionist as requested on 10/03/25.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 62 residents. The Sample included 17 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage of three of its six medication carts. Findings Included:- On 12/01/25 at 07:08 AM, an inspection of the Blue Hall revealed an unlocked and unsupervised medication cart next to the medication storage room. The cart contained prescription medications, stock medications, insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood), and treatment supplies for the residents on the hall. An inspection of the Blue Hall also revealed an unsecured, smaller treatment cart that contained stock medication and treatment supplies next to the medication cart. At 07:11 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) M entered the hallway and secured both carts. She stated staff were expected to lock the carts when not directly supervising them.On 12/01/25 at 07:15 AM, an inspection of the Red Hall revealed an unsecured and unsupervised treatment cart outside Resident (R) 62's room. The cart contained stock medications,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with five residents reviewed for immunizations. Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed offer or obtain informed declinations or a physician-documented contraindication for the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20 - vaccination for bacterial infections), and pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) vaccination for Resident (R) 2, R4, and R8. Findings included:- Review of R2's clinical record lacked documentation of PCV20 being offered, obtained informed declination, or a physician-documented contraindication prior to surveyors entering the facility.Review of R4's medical record lacked documentation of PCV20 being offered, obtained informed declination, or a physician-documented contraindication prior to surveyors entering the facility.Review of R8's clinical record documented not eligible for PCV20; the medical record lacked documentation of PCV20 being offered, obtained informed declination, or a physician-documented contraindication prior to surveyors entering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 62 residents. The Sample included 17, with two residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a dignified care environment for Resident (R) 1 and R21 during meal service. Findings Included:- On 12/02/25 at 12:22 PM, an observation was completed in the main dining room for meal service.R1 (a cognitively impaired resident who was physically dependent on staff assistance) sat in his Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with the ability to tilt and recline) at the table closest to the kitchen entry door. R1 had a Foley catheter (an indwelling urinary catheter with a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag). R1's urinary collection bag was hung directly under his wheelchair. R1's urinary collection bag was visible and was one-third full with bright yellow urine. R1 had no privacy cover on his urinary collection bag.R21 (a cognitively intact resident who was physically dependent on staff for assistance) sat at the dining room table closest to the kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one reviewed for privacy. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to secure protected health information (PHI) for Resident (R) 62. Findings Included:On 12/01/25 at 07:15 AM, an inspection of the Red Hall revealed an unsecured and unsupervised treatment cart outside R62's room. The cart contained stock medications, treatment supplies, and insulin for residents on the hall. The cart laptop was open and contained R62's picture and protected health information (PHI) within direct view.On 12/01/25 at 07:18 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) J opened R62's door and exited the room into the hallway. LN J stated she was not sure if the medication carts were supposed to be locked, but would lock them during the survey inspection. She stated the PHI should not be left open on the computers when not in use.On 12/03/25 at 02:43 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated that staff have been educated to ensure the computers were locked or placed in hidden mode when staff walk away from them to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with five reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. Based on the record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 37, R58, R61, R67, and R73 were free from abuse when their medication was misappropriated from the facility's medication cart.Findings included: - The Facility Incident Report 2599012 completed on 08/27/25 indicated R37, R58, R61, R67, and R73's pain medication showed errors in medication that occurred at the times when Licensed Nurse (LN) K worked and had possession of the narcotic keys.A record review of R37 (resident with intact cognition) documented R37 had had pain from a fracture. R37 was a long-term care resident who recently suffered a left femur fracture and underwent surgery for fixation. R37 had documented decline in her functional mobility and decline in her ability to assist in her self-care tasks.A record review of R58 (resident with moderately impaired cognition) documented R58 needed moderately/maximal assistance with activities of daily living (ADL).A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer/discharge as soon as practicable, and the facility also failed to provide a bed hold notice with the required information for Resident (R) 50. Findings included:- R50's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypotension (low blood pressure) and Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 11/17/25 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R50's Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 11/25/25 documented she triggered for falls related to impaired balance and history of falls. R50's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five reviewed for care plan. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R) 54 related to his activities of daily living (ADL).Findings Included: - R54's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) noted diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH- non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion).R54's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five reviewed for care plan revisions. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 38 and R27's care plans to reflate changes in their care.Findings Included: - R38's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) noted diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), limited mobility, muscle weakness, and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted she could independently complete bathing, dressing, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS noted she was at risk for developing pressure ulcers but had no current injuries. The MDS noted she had pressure-reducing devices in place for her bed and wheelchair. R38's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one reviewed for quality of care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician order was followed for a daily weight for R45 to monitor for congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). Findings included:- R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of hypotension (low blood pressure), CHF, and atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 11/10/25 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated intact moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R45 had received diuretic (a medication to promote the formation and excretion of urine) medication during the observation period. R45's Dehydration Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 11/16/25 documented he had triggered for dehydration related to constipation. The nursing staff would monitor for signs or symptoms of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with two residents reviewed for treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure-reducing measures were placed on Resident (R) 2, and further failed to ensure R2's Low air loss (LAL) mattress (medical device that uses continuous airflow through small holes in the surface to reduce moisture, keep skin cool and dry, and redistribute pressure to prevent and treat pressure ulcers) was set at the proper weight. Findings Included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), senile degeneration of brain (a progress degeneration of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents, four residents were sampled for accidents and hazards. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 2's fall interventions as directed by her care plan.Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of diabetes mellitus (DM- when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), senile degeneration of brain (a progress degeneration of the brain with age) and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion).The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R2 was dependent on the staff for bathing and toileting. The MDS documented R2 had falls since admission or reentry or the prior assessment. The MDS documented R2 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one resident reviewed for respiratory care. Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was physician indication for oxygen administration for Resident (R) 27. Findings included:- R27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/09/25 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R27 had received respiratory treatment during the observation period. R27's Functional Abilities (Self-Care and Mobility) Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 04/29/25 documented R27 required staff assistance with his functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one resident reviewed for dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes are removed from the blood), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD- a terminal disease of the kidneys). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide standards of care related to Resident (R) 7's dialysis.Findings included:- R7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF- a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid) and end stage renal disease (the final stage of chronic kidney disease, where the kidneys have permanently stopped working and can no longer function at a level needed to sustain life).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R7 was impaired on one side of his body. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with two residents reviewed for hospice services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure collaboration between the nursing home and hospice services to identify hospice-supplied services, supplies, medication, and equipment for Resident (R) 3 and R1. Findings included:- R3's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) noted diagnoses of heart failure, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), overactive bladder, and morbid obesity (severely overweight). R3's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating mild cognitive impairment. The MDS noted she could independently complete bathing, transfers, showering, dressing, personal hygiene, toileting, and footwear. The MDS noted she reported she had little interest in doing things and had feelings of hopelessness.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 67 residents. The sample included three residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse between staff and Resident (R) 1 to the State Agency (SA) as required. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse.Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of pain, insomnia (inability to sleep), and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 02/20/25, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition.The Quarterly MDS dated 05/15/25, documented R1 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition.The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 02/25/25, documented R1 had intact cognition and was able to let staff know his needs and wants.R1's Care Plan dated 07/25/25, documented staff provided R1 with medications and other measures to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 61 residents. The sample included nine, with one reviewed for competent staffing. Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff possessed the appropriate skills and knowledge to identify the available epinephrine (medication used to alleviate symptoms of severe allergic reactions) during Resident (R) 1's anaphylaxis episode. This deficient practice placed R1 and all residents with allergies at risk for impaired quality of care. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness), blindness of right eye, acute kidney failure, and fracture (broken bone) of the right femur (thigh bone). R1's EMR indicated he was admitted on [DATE] for therapy services related to his recent right femur fracture. R1's EMR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R29's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), and cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) affecting the dominate right side. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R29 was independent with transfers, changes in position, and ambulation was not tested. The MDS documented R29 had no falls during the observation period. The Quarterly MDS dated 08/08/24 documented a BIMS score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R29 was independent with transfers, changes in position, and ambulation. The MDS documented R29 had no falls during the observation period. R29's Falls Care Area Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five reviewed for immunization status. Based on record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to obtain consent or declinations for the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV20- vaccination for bacterial infections) pneumococcal (type of bacterial infection) vaccination for Resident (R) 32, R10, R46, and R34. This placed the residents at increased risk for complications related to pneumonia. Findings included: - Review of R32's clinical record revealed the PCV13 was administered on 11/09/23. R32's clinical record lacked documentation the PCV20 was offered or declined and lacked documentation of a historical administration. A review of R10's clinical record revealed the PCV13 was administered on 10/24/19. R10's clinical record lacked documentation the PCV20 was offered or declined and lacked documentation of a historical administration. A review of R46's clinical record lacked documentation the PCV20 was offered or declined and lacked documentation of any historical administration. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents. One resident was sampled for reasonable accommodations of resident needs. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)45 had a call light within her reach. This deficient practice left R45 vulnerable to unmet care needs due to the inability to call for staff assistance. Findings included: - R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) affecting left dominant side, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notice for a facility-initiated transfer as soon as practicable for Resident (R) 31. This deficient practice placed R31 at risk of uninformed choices and miscommunication regarding care needs. Findings included: - R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), urinary incontinence, overweight, neoplasm (tumor) of right breast, and back pain. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R31 needed substantial to maximum assistance with transfers. R31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice with the required information to Resident (R) 31 and/or their legal representative when R31 transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice placed R31 at risk for impaired ability to return to the facility or her same room. Findings included: - R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), urinary incontinence, overweight, neoplasm (tumor) of right breast, and back pain. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R31 needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with three residents reviewed for treatment and services to prevent and heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 45's offloading boots were applied to her heels to prevent pressure ulcers. The facility also failed to ensure that R29's pressure-relieving cushion was in his wheelchair. This placed R45 and R29 at increased risk for worsening pressure ulcers and the development of new pressure ulcers. Findings Included: - R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of aphasia (a condition with disordered or absent language function) following cerebral infarction (stroke - the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 45's palm splint was applied. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for discomfort and decreased range of motion (ROM- the full movement potential of a joint, usually its range of flexion and extension). Findings included: - R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) affecting left dominant side, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident observed for bowel and bladder. Based on observation, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to assess, identify, and implement interventions related to Resident(R)31's incontinence. This deficient practice placed R31 at risk of impaired dignity and increased risk for urinary tract infections (UTI). Finding included: - R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), urinary incontinence, overweight, neoplasm (tumor) of right breast, and back pain. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R31 needed substantial to maximum assistance with toileting hygiene.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident(R) 21's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP- ventilation device that blows a gentle stream of air into the nose to keep the airway open during sleep) mask was stored in a sanitary manner. This placed R21 at an increased risk for respiratory infection and complications. Findings included: - R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), thrombocytopenia (abnormally low number of platelets, the parts of the blood that help blood to clot,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Residents (R)12 and R46 had a documented safety assessment for the use of side rails that addressed entrapment, consent for the use of the side rails, and failed to ensure the resident and/or responsible party were advised of the risks and/or benefits of the use of the side rails. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed decisions and impaired safety related to the risks associated with the use of side rails. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R12's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) noted diagnoses of hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), aphasia (difficulty speaking), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R12's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify Resident (R)21's physician according to the physician-ordered parameters for blood glucose monitoring. This deficient practice placed R21 at risk for delayed treatment of hyperglycemia (greater than the normal amount of glucose in the blood) and unnecessary medication complications. Findings included: - R21's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of sleep apnea (a disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), thrombocytopenia (abnormally low number of platelets, the parts of the blood that help blood to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with six reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)34 and R32 had a stop date for as-needed (PRN) lorazepam (anxiety medication). This placed the residents at risk for adverse effects from psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medication. Findings included: - R34's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke - the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain) of the left non-dominant side, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear, attention deficit disorder, hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0775 — isolatedKeep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that physician-ordered laboratory test results for Resident (R) 31 were included in R31's clinical record. This deficient practice could result in unnecessary tests and delayed treatment. Findings included: - R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), urinary incontinence, overweight, neoplasm (tumor) of right breast, and back pain. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R31 needed substantial to maximum assistance with toileting hygiene. The MDS documented that R31 did not have a trial of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for hospice (a type of health care that focuses on the terminally ill patient's pain and symptoms and attending to their emotional and spiritual needs at the end of life) services. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a coordinated plan of care, which coordinated care and services provided by the facility with the care and services provided by hospice, was developed and available for Resident (R)45. This placed the resident at risk for inappropriate end-of-life care. Finding Included: - R45's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function) following cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hemiparesis/hemiplegia (weakness and paralysis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 45 residents. The facility identified five residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms that employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to implement signage or indicators within the physical environment to alert staff and visitors of the required EBP and personal protective equipment (PPE) for Resident (R) 7 and R32. The facility additionally failed to store respiratory equipment in a sanitary manner. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Included Findings: - On 10/14/24 at 07:05 AM a walkthrough of the facility was completed with the following observations noted: An inspection of R7's room revealed no EBP indicator signage or personal protective equipment in or around her room related to her wounds. An inspection of R32's room revealed no EBP indicator signage or personal protective equipment in or around her room related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 51. The sample included 13 residents. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide activities on the weekends which reflected the residents' interests, and preferences. This placed the residents at risk for boredom, isolation, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - A review of the facility's activity calendars for April, May, June, and July 2023 indicated church services on Sundays and Always Available Items marked for Saturdays. The calendars noted no other activities on the weekends. The activity calendar for April, May, and June 2023 revealed no activities scheduled on any Sunday except afternoon church services. In a confidential interview with the resident council on 07/18/2023, several residents reported that though there were weekday activities, the facility did not provide any structured activities on most Saturdays and Sundays. The council reported they had church on Sundays, but the rest of the day had no scheduled activities. On 07/19/2023 at 01:20pm Activities Staff Z reported the facility provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 51 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to food storage. This deficient practice placed the residents who received food from the facility kitchen at risk related to food borne illnesses and food safety concerns. Findings included: - On 07/17/23 at 07:40 AM an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed one opened bag of marshmallows. The bag was open to air and undated. On 07/17/23 at 07:42 AM an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed one opened bag of elbow macaroni. The bag was undated. On 07/17/23 at 07:43 AM an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed one opened package of spaghetti noodles. The package was undated. On 07/17/23 at 07:46 AM an observation in the kitchen's dry food storage room revealed one plastic storage container of rice. The container was not labeled and lacked a date. On 07/17/23 at 07:48 AM an observation in the main kitchen area revealed a plastic storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 51 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control standards were followed related to hand hygiene, medical equipment storage/cleaning, and catheter care. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to infectious diseases. Findings Included: - On 07/17/23 the facility reported no residents were on transmission-based precautions. On 07/17/23 at 0709 AM an inspection of the Blue Hall revealed an oxygen tank (cylindrical tank used to provide supplemental oxygen), tubing, and nasal cannula (tubing that delivers oxygen directly through both nostrils of the nose) stored on the back of a wheelchair outside Resident (R)45's room. The nasal cannula and tubing hung down the back of the wheelchair and rested against the back of wheelchairs seat. No storage bag or protective barrier was present. The oxygen tank's gauge meter was in the red (empty). The tubing was not dated and labeled. On 07/17/23 at 07:11AM an inspection of the Blue Hall transfer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51. The sample included 13 residents with two reviewed for dignity. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide dignified care for Residents (R)206 and R30. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R206's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of spinal stenosis (degenerative condition of the spine that could cause weakness and loss of use of extremities), hemiplegia (left sided paralysis of one side of the body), hemiparesis (left sided muscular weakness of one half of the body), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), insomnia (difficulty sleeping), and Parkinson's Disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). R206 admitted to the facility on [DATE] for respite care. R206 had not had a Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 13 residents with three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices review. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)6 with an Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC CMS-form 10123) and Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN CMS-10055) with Medicare-Part A days remaining. This deficient practice placed R6 at risk for delayed care and missed services. Findings Included: - A review of R6 EMR revealed an Medicare End of Stay Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed on 04/14/23 noting she was being discharge for Medicare part A services but expected to remain in the facility. A review of R6's EMR indicated her last covered day for Medicare part A services was 04/15/23. On 07/19/23 R6's Beneficiary Notification Review was completed. The review indicated the facility-initiated her discharge from therapy services but R6 was not provided an ABN or NOMNC form. A review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requirements indicated the facility was required to issue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident (R) 9 for special treatment and programs when the MDS documented she received dialysis (a process of removing excess water, solutions, and toxins from the blood) during the look back period. This deficient practice placed R9 at risk for inappropriate care planning and care needs. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), unspecified psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine which indicated moderately impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two residents reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 42's comprehensive care plan to include administration of oxygen. This deficient practice placed R42 at risk for the potential alteration of continuous care among nursing home staff, that could result in adverse consequences related to respiratory distress and adverse side effects. Findings included: - R42's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), sleep apnea (disorder of sleep characterized by periods without respirations), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that physician ordered daily weights were obtained and monitored for Resident (R) 45 who had congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). This deficient practice placed R45 at risk for unwanted weight/fluid gain and possible complications. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R45 documented diagnoses of CHF, chronic kidney disease (condition characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function over time), biventricular heart failure (a condition of both left and right-sided heart of the resulting in shortness of breath and a build-up of fluid), and diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R45 had a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure care planned fall interventions were followed for Resident (R) 1 after a fall on 06/25/23. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for additional falls and possible injury. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R1 documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), peripheral vascular disease (PVD- abnormal condition affecting the blood vessels), osteoarthritis (chronic arthritis without inflammation), and constipation (difficulty passing stools). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R1 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R1 required extensive assist of one staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). R1's balance was not steady and was only able to stabilize with staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 13 with two reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide consist weekly weight monitoring as identified on Resident (R)14's nutritional care plan. This deficient practice placed R14 at risk for complication related to weight loss and malnutrition (condition that develops when the body is deprived of vitamins, minerals and other nutrients). Finding included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R14's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition, legal blindness, dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), and spondylosis (age-related condition where the joints and cartilage lined discs of the neck are affected). R14's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/08/2023 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment was not completed due to severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she required extensive assistance from two staff for transfers, bed mobility,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when antihypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat hypertension (high blood pressure) was not administered for Resident (R) 39 and blood sugars were outside of parameters for R7. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk for unnecessary medication use and possible unwarranted side effects. Findings included: - R39's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 51 residents. The sample included 13 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 9 did not receive antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) for an extended duration when staff failed to change a scheduled dose in response to a physician ordered gradual dose reduction (GDR) and failed to ensure the as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication did not extend for a duration longer than 14 days without physician visit and rationale. The facility further failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or the required physician documentation, for continued use for R36's Seroquel (antipsychotic medication). This deficient practice placed R9 and R36 at risk for unnecessary psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medications and adverse side effects. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-03 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 62 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on interviews, observation, and record review, the facility failed to post the previous state inspection information in a location accessible to residents and visitors. Findings included:- On 12/02/25 at 03:30 PM, review of the state agency results book that was available in the lobby area lacked the Statement of Deficiencies, which included citations from a complaint survey conducted on 10/25/25. On 12/03/25 at 10:21 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the survey binder that was available for the residents, families, and visitors did not contain the previous state inspection results. The facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 04/27/18, documented the resident had the right to self-determination.
- No harm found · C2023-07-19 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 51 residents. Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to submit accurate staffing hours to the federal regulatory agency through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ), when the facility failed to accureately submit staffing hour data for all nursing personnel as required. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 Quarters three and four documented the facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 hours a day during quarter three and four (05/14/22, 05/15/22, 05/28/22, 06/03/22, 07/03/22; 07/10/22; 07/24/22; 07/31/22, 08/07/22, and 08/21/22. On 07/19/23 at 11:15 PM Administrative Staff A provided a list of LN's punch times for the requested dates above. The list revealed that there was 24-hour LN coverage on each of the days noted above on the PBJ report. On 07/19/23 at 02:14 PM Administrative Nurse D stated she made out the scheduled for the nurses but she was not certain who submitted the nursing hour but that was done by the corporate office. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$29,286 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $14,385 — penalty dated 2026-06-01
- $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-03-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MIDWEST HEALTH — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 3.9 | -2.9 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 3.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.1 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLATON ENTERPRISES, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/26/2003 |
| EATON, FLOYD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/26/2003 |
| FLOYD C EATON III TRUST 2012 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 07/01/2016 |
| JAMES BRETT KLAUSMAN TRUST 2012 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 07/01/2016 |
| JAMIE N EATON TRUST 2012 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 07/01/2016 |
| MICHAEL GRAHAM KLAUSMAN TRUST 2012 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 07/01/2016 |
| KLAUSMAN, JAMES | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 06/26/2003 |
| MIDWEST HEALTH, INC. 06122001 | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2010 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175445. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.