Stoneybrook Retirement Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 37.9 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-04-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 40 residents. The sample included 14 residents, with two reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, hazard free environment for Resident (R) 30, who had severe cognitive impairment and poor safety awareness. She was independently mobile and had a history of wandering throughout the facility. On 01/28/23 staff observed R30 at approximately 10:23 PM. Then, at 10:30 PM, staff noted the resident was not in her room and began a search for her. The facility staff searched every room and the perimeter outside of the facility but could not locate R30. At 11:23 PM, almost an hour after staff last saw the resident, staff located R30 on the floor in a closet, in the kitchen, which was supposed to be locked. The failure allowed R30 to wander unattended into the kitchen area, which had multiple safety hazards including a stove, knives, and chemicals stored in the unlocked kitchen closet, which placed R30 in Immediate Jeopardy.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-05-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. Findings included:- Review of the facility's Nursing Schedule lacked consecutive eight-hour RN coverage for the following dates:02/27/2602/28/2603/1/2603/14/2603/15/2603/29/2604/11/2604/12/2605/09/2605/10/26 On 5/13/26 at 10:15 PM, Administrative Staff A stated they have a scheduler for nursing staff, and then Administrative Nurse D would look over the scheduler. They do have as-needed (PRN) staff and verified that they did not have RN coverage on the above dates.The facility's Competent and Sufficient Staffing dated 09/24, the facility would provide enough staff with the skill sets and competencies necessary to provide care/services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. A registered nurse provides services for at least eight (8) consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven (7) days a week. RNs may be scheduled for more than eight (8) hours, depending on the acuity of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO- a public official who works to resolve resident issues in nursing facilities) when Resident (R) 17 was transferred and admitted to the hospital. Findings included:- R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a Nurse's Note, dated 01/11/26 at 04:02 PM, that documented R17 admitted to the hospital.R17's clinical record lacked evidence of the LTCO notification for R17's 01/11/26 hospital transfer. The facility was unable to provide evidence the LTCO was notified.On 05/12/26 at 02:04 PM, observation revealed R17 sat in a wheelchair on the patio located by the dining room exit door. On 05/14/26 at 10:21 AM, Administrative Staff A stated she was responsible for notifying LTCO when R17 was transferred to the hospital. Administrative Staff verified she had not notified them.The facility's Discharge Criteria Policy, revised 11/28/2017, documented when a resident was transferred or discharged from the facility, staff would send a copy of the discharge notice to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for Resident (R)1 to address smoking safety. Findings included:- R1's diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R1 was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs), used a walker for mobility, required staff supervision in the facility, had an elopement alarm that was used daily, and smoked. R1's Elopement Care Plan, dated 04/21/26, directed staff to remind the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary activity of daily living services to maintain good personal hygiene, including bathing, for Resident (R)1 and R26. Findings included:- R1's diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R1 was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs) but required staff supervision for most ADL including bathing. R1's Care Plan, dated 04/21/26, lacked documentation of R1's required assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility nursing staff failed to provide adequate services to support nutrition when staff failed to consistently provide Resident (R) 5 her physician-ordered Boost Plus (nutritional drink). Findings included:- R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R5 had a diagnosis of anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear). R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R5 had no swallowing disorders, a weight of 134 pounds, and had no weight loss or gain. R5's Care Plan, revised on 04/19/26, documented that R5 was able to feed herself after her food was set up and was a picky eater. The plan documented R5 enjoyed milkshakes and preferred to drink up to five Boost Plus per day as part of her regular meal. The Physician Order, dated 11/14/25 at 05:00 PM, instructed staff to provide R5 with 240 milliliter (ml), of supplement with meals and at bedtime. Review of R5's May…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3's remained free from significant medication errors when staff administered seven units of insulin that had been discontinued. Findings included:- On 05/12/26 at 12:15 PM, observation revealed, after Licensed Nurse (LN) G took R3's blood sugar (the concentration of sugar present in the bloodstream), she stated that R3 did not need any sliding scale insulin (a hormone produced by the pancreas that regulates blood sugar) but did need his noon insulin. LN G's facility tablet showed R3 had an order for insulin aspart (rapid acting), seven units (u), subcutaneously, four times a day. LN G primed (the process of dialing a small, two unit does and expelling it into the air before it was injected) the insulin Flex Pen (a pre-filled, disposable insulin delivery device) and administered the insulin into his abdomen (the belly or midsection).On 05/12/26 at 12:30 PM, during record review and interview with staff, the order for the insulin was not on R3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications when staff failed to discard Resident (R)11 insulin (a hormone that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) outdated flex pen and failed to label R3 and R6s' insulin flex pens when initially opened for use. Findings included:- On [DATE] at 08:10 AM, observation of the Rapid Recovery and Purple Pride nurse medication cart revealed R11's Humalog (rapid-acting insulin) flex pen was labeled with an open date of [DATE]. The insulin had a discard date of [DATE]. R3 and R6's Novolog (fast acting insulin) flex pen was not labeled with an open date or a discard date. On [DATE] at 08:15 AM, License Nurse (LN) H verified the nurses should date the insulin when opened and discard the outdated insulin flex pens. On [DATE] at 01:00 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the nurse should label and date the insulin flex pens with the date opened and check the insulin flex pens for out dates and discard if expired.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections when staff failed to keep Resident (R) 3's urinary catheter tubing ( thin, flexible, hollow medical tube designed to be inserted into the bladder to drain, collect, or monitor urine) from dragging on the floor underneath his wheelchair. Staff also failed to disinfect a multi-use glucometer (an instrument used to calculate blood glucose) after using it to obtain a blood sugar reading for R3. Findings included:1. On 05/12/2026 at 12:13 PM, observation revealed Linese Nurse (LN) G checked R3's blood sugar with a glucometer. Further observation revealed LN G placed the glucometer back into the bag and put it on the medication cart without disinfecting it. On 05/12/23 at 12:13 PM, LN G verified the glucometer was a multi-use glucometer and stated she thought maybe the night shift was responsible for disinfecting it. She said she was not sure what she should use to disinfect it. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 13 or his representative with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy when he was transferred to the hospital. This placed the resident at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R13's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R13 had a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency and urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system) reaction due to having an indwelling urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag), and sepsis (life-threatening systemic reaction that develops due to infections which cause inflammation throughout the entire body). R13's Quarterly Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 35 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess Resident (R) 10's ability to smoke safely. This placed R10 at risk for injury during smoking. Findings included: - R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), peripheral vascular disease (PVD- slow and progressive circulation disorder causing narrowing, blockage, or spasms in a blood vessel), congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), right femur (thigh-bone) fracture with routine healing, dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), and personal history of nicotine and alcohol…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MIDWEST HEALTH — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $840K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS