Topside Manor INC
210 Kansas Avenue, Goodland, KS 67735 · For profit - Corporation · 45 certified beds · (785) 890-7517 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 6 actual-harm citations
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $75,463 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-03)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.2% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 6.7% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.5% | 2.9% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 6.5% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.4% | 4.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.6% | 16.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 22.0% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 4.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.6% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 28.6% | 18.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.5% | 1.9% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.7% | 22.4% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 26.4% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.83 | 1.80 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 5.69 | 2.13 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
29.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 29.4%CMS range 17.1–40.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.1%CMS range 8.5–20.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 7.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.6%CMS range 5.4–17.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 43.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.58 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 40 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from accidents when staff failed to safely operate a mechanical lift resulting in a fall with injury. On 05/22/24 at approximately 05:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M prepared R1 for a mechanical lift transfer (by use of a ceiling lift) from her bed to her wheelchair. CNA M failed to ensure the lift sling harness loops were attached to the mechanical lift correctly. During the transfer, R1 fell out of the lift sling to the floor and required emergency transfer and evaluation. R1 was then transferred to a higher level of care to treat a right comminuted (a broken bone that has multiple pieces or fragments at the fracture site) distal (away from the farthest point of origin or attachment) femoral (thigh bone) fracture (broken bone) as a result of the incorrect placement of the harness loops and subsequent fall.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 43 residents with three residents reviewed for falls and accidents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1's safety during a transfer when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M used the ceiling-mounted full body lift to transfer R1 from her bed to her wheelchair. During the transfer, R1 slid out of the lift sling onto the floor. As a result, R1 sustained a left femoral (thigh bone) fracture and a left fibular (one of the two bones in the lower leg) fracture. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for pain. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), obesity (excessive body fat) and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 01/29/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 44 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to identify fall risk and initiate fall interventions for Resident (R) 1 on 11/08/23 when he admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of frequent falls. On 11/09/23 at 10:10 PM staff found R1 in his room on the floor. R1 complained of severe pain in his back and was transported to the local hospital where he was diagnosed with fourth and fifth rib fractures on his right side. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for falls, injury, and pain. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), history of falling, and weakness. The Discharge Return Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 11/10/23, documented R1 required moderate to substantial assistance with all activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement preventative interventions for Resident (R)23 who had a current pressure area on her buttocks and had a decline in health. As a result, R23 developed an unstageable (pressure injury where tissue loss and actual depth of the ulcer is completely obscured) pressure ulcer on her left heel. The facility further failed to ensure the resident received interventions, which included offloading pressure to the resident's heels to promote healing and prevent further pressure injuries. This deficient practiced placed R23 at risk for further breakdown. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Recorded (EMR) for R23 documented diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with six reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a root cause analysis to identify causative factors and failed to implement meaningful, resident centered interventions for Resident (R) 31, who subsequently fell and sustained a nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture (broken) of the right femur. The facility failed to investigate two falls for R31 and failed to follow R31's plan of care, which resulted in a fall. The facility also failed to complete a root cause analysis to identify causative factors and failed to implement meaningful, resident centered interventions for R34. The facility failed to prevent R27 from exiting the facility in 20-degree weather. This placed the residents at risk for further falls and injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R31 documented diagnoses of history of falls, lack of coordination, diastolic heart failure (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the development of two facility acquired pressure ulcers for Resident (R) 1, who acquired a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (a deep wound that reaches the muscles, ligaments, or even bone) and R20, who acquired a Stage 2 pressure ulcer (shallow with a reddish base and have a break in the top two layers of skin). The facility failed to implement interventions which included wound assessments to evaluate for effectiveness of treatments, nutritional consults to promote optimal healing, and preventative measures to promote healing and prevent worsening for R1. This deficient practice resulted in a facility acquired Stage 4 pressure ulcer which caused pain and placed R1 at increased risk due to wound infection. The facility further failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a facility acquired Stage 2 pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for pain. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer physician ordered pain medication in a timely manner for R1, who had pain during wound care of her Stage 4 pressure ulcer (a deep wound that reaches the muscles, ligaments, or even bone) placing the resident at risk for further pain and discomfort. The facility further failed to assess R1's pain levels during wound cares and adjust treatment or administer the available as-needed pain medication for breakthrough pain. As a result, R1 reported severe unrelieved pain, rated higher than her habitual pain, in her wound area and back. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), chronic pain (persistent pain that lasts weeks to years and may be caused by inflammation or dysfunctional nerves), vitamin deficiency (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff possessed current licensure as required. This deficient practice placed all the residents residing in the facility at risk for not attaining or maintaining the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - The Kansas State Board of Nursing License Verification, printed on [DATE], documented Licensed Nurse (LN) G's Licensed Practical Nursing (LPN) license expired on [DATE]. The Facility's Working Schedule for the month of [DATE], documented LN G worked eight days out of twenty-three days as an LPN after LN G's license had expired. LN G was the only Licensed Nurse on the evening shift, 06:00 PM to 06:00 AM, on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. On [DATE], LN G was suspended and taken off the schedule until her license was reinstated. On [DATE] at 10:30 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated LN G had come to her on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 45 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate administrative oversight when the facility failed to monitor and ensure all nurses practicing in the facility maintained active license as required to provide the residents residing in the facility with the care they needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice placed the residents residing in the facility at risk for lack of quality nursing care. Findings included: - The Kansas State Board of Nursing License Verification, printed on [DATE], documented Licensed Nurse (LN) G's Licensed Practical Nursing (LPN) license expired on [DATE]. The Facility's Working Schedule for the month of [DATE], documented LN G worked eight days out of twenty-three days as an LPN after LN G's license had expired. LN G was the only Licensed Nurse on the evening shift, 06:00 PM to 06:00 AM, on [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, placing all residents who reside at the facility at risk of decreased quality of care. Findings included: - The Payroll Based Journal (PBJ-a required detail of staffing information submitted by nursing homes to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) documented the facility lacked eight consecutive hours of RN coverage for the following months: April 2023- seven days May 2023- seven days June 2023- six days July 2023- eight days August 2023- six days September 2023- six days October 2023- eight days November 2023- four days December 2023- four days March 2024- four days April 2024- four days May 2024- four days June 2024- eight days July 2024- eight days August 2024- six days On 08/29/24 at 08:27 AM, Administrative Nurse D verified the facility did not have an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours on the dates listed on the PBJ. The facility's Staffing, Sufficient and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the 44 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility's kitchens. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 08/27/24 at 11:22 AM, a review of the noon meal consisted of chicken parmesan, buttered penne pasta, asparagus tips, fruit crisp, and garlic toast. On 08/27/24 at 11:30 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff BB in the kitchen overseeing the preparation of the noon meal. On 08/26/24 at 08:00 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified she was not a certified dietary manager. Dietary Staff BB stated she had enrolled in the classes. On 08/29/24 at 07:15 AM, Administrative Staff A verified Dietary Staff BB had no dietary manager certification. The facility's Dietitian Policy, revised in November 2022, documented that if a dietitian is not employed full-time (35 or more hours per week) a director of food and nutrition services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This placed the residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchens at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 08/26/24 at 11:48 PM observation of the noon meal, in the Sunflower House, revealed the following: Dietary Staff (DS) DD applied gloves and touched the refrigerator, counter, and pans. Then, wearing the same soiled gloves, DS DD touched a resident's roast beef while cutting it up, and then continued to serve residents their plates. Further observation revealed DS DD, with the same soiled gloves, took a baked potato out of the oven, placed it on a resident's plate, and held onto it while cutting it. Further observation revealed DS DD continued the same process, with the same soiled gloves, when plating the other residents' roast beef and baked potatoes. Continued observation revealed DS DD, wearing the same soiled gloves, wiped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-29 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 44 residents. Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate staffing information through Payroll Based Journaling (PBJ) as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing inadequate staffing. Findings included: - The PBJ report provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Quarter (Q) 3 indicated no licensed nurse coverage on seven dates. The PBJ report for FY 2023 Q4 recorded no licensed nurse coverage on nine dates. The PBJ report for FY 2024 Q2 recorded no licensed nurse on four dates. A review of the facility licensed nurse payroll data for the dates listed above revealed a licensed nurse was on duty for 24 hours a day seven days a week. On 08/28/24 at 07:58 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the information for the PBJ was submitted from someone off campus and she did not realize there were submission problems. Administrative Staff A further stated there was always a licensed nurse in the building and they have more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to promote dignity for Resident (R) 22, when staff called R22 Honey multiple times instead of addressing her by her proper name. This placed the resident at risk for undignified care and services. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R22 had diagnoses of moderate dementia with psychotic disturbance, depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness), agitation (feelings of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical condition), anxiety ( mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear, restlessness (the inability to relax as a result of anxiety), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Beneficiary Liability notices. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the correct CMS Form 10055, Skilled Nursing Facility [SNF] Advanced Beneficiary Notice [ABN] which included the estimated cost to continue services for skilled services to the resident or their representative for three residents: Resident (R) 1, R16, and R145. This placed all three residents at risk for uninformed decisions regarding skilled services. Findings included: - The Medicare SNF ABN form 10055 informs the beneficiaries Medicare may not pay for future skilled therapy and did not provide an estimated cost to continue their services. The form included options for the beneficiary to (1) receive specified services listed, and bill Medicare for an official decision on payment. I understand if Medicare does not pay, I will be responsible for payment, but can appeal to Medicare. (2) receive therapy listed, but do not bill Medicare, I am…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three reviewed for hospitalization. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a written notice for a facility-initiated transfer for Resident (R) 5, R11, and R1 or their representatives when they were transferred to the hospital. The facility also failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO-a public official who works to resolve resident issues in nursing facilities) of the discharges. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed care choices. Findings included: - R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the resident had diagnoses of pain in the knee and hyponatremia (concentration of sodium in your blood is abnormally low). R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented that R5 required partial, moderate staff assistance with oral hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with four reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure staff followed the care plan to prevent accidents when staff failed to place Resident (R) 9's alarm (a device designed to monitor a patient's movements) underneath her when she was in bed per her plan of care resulting in a fall. This also placed R9 at risk for injuries from falls. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R9 had diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), muscle weakness, unsteadiness on her feet, and a history of falling. R9's Quarterly Minimum Data Assessment, (MDS) revised 07/12/24, documented R9 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R9 used a walker and had a fall with injury during the observation period. R9's Care Plan revised 04/22/24, documented R9 was a high risk for falls, and used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate respiratory care and services for Resident (R) 22 when staff did not provide her oxygen during the breakfast meal and failed to store the oxygen tubing and cannula (a medical device that delivers supplemental oxygen to patients through their nose) in a sanitary manner when not in use. This placed R22 at risk for respiratory complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R22 had diagnoses of moderate dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with psychotic disturbance, depression (an abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents with one reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide dementia care and services for Resident (R) 22, who had dementia and behaviors. This placed R22 at risk for abuse and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R22 had diagnoses of moderate dementia with psychotic disturbance, depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness), agitation (feelings of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical condition), anxiety ( mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear, restlessness (the inability to relax as a result of anxiety), and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-progressive and irreversible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility kitchen staff failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance when dietary staff failed to prepare all the food items on the noon menu while preparing Resident (R) 20 and R22's pureed diet. This placed the residents at risk for impaired nutrition. Findings included: - On 08/27/24 at 11:22 AM, a review of the noon meal consisted of chicken parmesan, buttered penne pasta, asparagus tips, fruit crisp, and garlic toast. On 08/27/24 at 11:22 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) CC reported the Meadowlark Kitchenette had two residents who received a pureed diet. DS CC stated staff only prepared mashed potatoes and gravy for R22 at the noon meal and R20 would receive the full pureed diet. DS CC placed a 4-ounce (oz) piece of chicken parmesan into the blender container, added two (8 oz) ladles of red marinate sauce into the container, and blended it. DS CC reported it was still too thick and added another 8-oz ladle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 44 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five residents reviewed for immunizations to include pneumococcal (a disease that refers to a range of illnesses that affect various parts of the body and are caused by infection) vaccinations. Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to offer, or obtain an informed declination or a physician-documented contraindication for the pneumococcal PCV20 vaccination to Resident (R) 9 per the latest guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This placed the resident at risk for pneumococcal infection and related complications. Findings included: - R9's admission Minimum Data Set dated 12/02/23 documented R9 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS documented R9 received the influenza (flu) vaccine before admitting to the facility. The MDs documented R9's pneumococcal vaccination was not up to date, and was not offered. A review of R9's clinical medical records lacked evidence the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 43 residents with three residents reviewed for medication errors. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an antibiotic for a urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system) for Resident (R) 2 was available for administration. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for a worsening UTI and health complications. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R2 had diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear) and UTI. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 03/14/24, documented R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of three which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R2 was dependent on staff assistance for toileting and bathing. The MDS documented R2 did not have a UTI in the last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 43 residents with three residents reviewed for medications. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 2's psychotropic (alters mood or thought) medication used off-label use for insomnia (inability to sleep) after a trial increase. This deficient practice placed R2 at risk for inadequate oversight, lack of physician involvement, and ineffective dosing for Trazodone. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R2 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings pf sadness), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) and urinary tract infection (UTI). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of three which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 44 residents with three residents reviewed for pain. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident (R) 1 respiratory needs and equipment. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for respiratory well-being due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), polyneuropathy (the simultaneous malfunction of peripheral nerves throughout the body), chronic pain, hypokalemia (low level of potassium in the blood), and edema (swelling). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 12/07/23, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R1 required oxygen and a non-invasive ventilator (a machine that provides ventilatory support without using…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 44 residents with three residents reviewed for pain. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to provide respiratory care with the Trilogy non-invasive ventilator (an all-in-one ventilation device capable of delivering both invasive and non-invasive ventilation that can be more finely calibrated and adjusted to meet individual needs) to Resident (R) 1. The facility did not have orders from the primary care physician regarding how to run the Trilogy non-invasive ventilator, what settings the non-invasive ventilator needed to be set at, or how and when to clean the Trilogy non-invasive ventilator. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for respiratory failure. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), polyneuropathy (the simultaneous malfunction of peripheral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 44 residents with three residents reviewed for pain. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 received her pain medication as ordered to help alleviate her pain. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk of pain and emotional distress from being in pain. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), polyneuropathy (the simultaneous malfunction of peripheral nerves throughout the body), chronic pain, hypokalemia (low level of potassium in the blood), and edema (swelling). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 12/07/23, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R1 required oxygen and a non-invasive ventilator (a machine that provides ventilatory support without using an artificial airway). The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 44 residents with three residents reviewed for medication errors. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 was free from medication errors. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk of medical complications from not receiving her medications as they were ordered by her physician. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), polyneuropathy (the simultaneous malfunction of peripheral nerves throughout the body), chronic pain, hypokalemia (low level of potassium in the blood), and edema (swelling). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 12/07/23, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R1 required oxygen and a non-invasive ventilator (a machine that provides ventilatory support without using an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week, placing all the residents who resided at the facility at risk of lack of assessments and inappropriate care. Finding included: - Review of Payroll Based Journal (PBJ- a required detail information submitted by nursing homes of staffing required from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services[CMS]) revealed the facility lacked RN eight-hour coverage for the months of August 2022, September 2022, October 2022, November 2022, December 2022, January 2023, February 2023, March 2023, April 2023, May 2023, June 2023, July 2023, and August 2023. On 08/30/23 12:38 PM, Administrative Nurse D verified the days without eight consecutive RN coverage a day in the months listed above. Upon request, the facility did not provide a policy for eight consecutive RN daily coverage. On 08/30/23 Administrative Staff A stated the CMS requirements would be considered the policy. The facility failed to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with meaningful resident centered interventions for falls for Resident (R) 31, and R34. The failed to revise the care plan related to mood for R23 and R2. This placed the resident's at risk for inappropriate care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R31 documented diagnoses of history of falls, lack of coordination, diastolic heart failure (a condition in which the hearts main pumping chamber becomes still and unable to fill properly), dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R31 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to prepare, store, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of three households. The facility staff failed to change gloves after touching their clothing, doors, papers, and other objects, and touched pancakes with the same contaminated gloves. This placed the residents at risk for food borne illness in two of three households. Findings included: On 08/29/23 at 08:30 AM, observation in the Cottonwood Household revealed Dietary Staff CC wore gloves as she prepared breakfast. Further observation revealed DS CC picked up a pancake and moved it to the side of the plate with her gloved hands so that she could pour syrup on the bottom pancake. She went to a drawer with clothing protectors, opened it and put the protector on a resident. DS CC went to a resident room with the same soiled gloves and returned with a dirty cup that she put on the kitchen cabinet. DS CC touched paper in a notebook, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of Resident (R) 2's suicidal ideations, R7's elopement ( when a resident exits the facility without the knowledge or supervision of staff) in winter weather, R13's lack of bowel movements and R23's verbalizations of wanting to die. This placed the residents at risk for delayed treatment due to lack of physician involvement. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R2 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), chronic pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity, difficulty or discomfort in breathing), altered mental status, chronic atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), need of assistance with personal care, and urinary tract infection (UTI). The Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify Resident (R)27's leaving the facility without the knowledge of staff in the middle of the night as an allegation of neglect and report to the state agency as required. This placed R27 at risk for unidentified and/or ongoing neglect. Findings included: -The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R27 had diagnoses of restlessness and agitation (feeling of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical condition), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), need for assistance with personal cares, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, generalized anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), abnormalities of gait and mobility, and pain. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R27 had severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to investigate Resident (R)27's incident of tweezers in her throat as well as R27 exiting the facility without staff awareness during winter weather. This failure placed R27 at risk for ongoing neglect and unidentified care needs. Findings included: -The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R27 had diagnoses of restlessness and agitation (feeling of aggravation or restlessness brought on by a provocation or a medical condition), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), need for assistance with personal cares, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, generalized anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), abnormalities of gait and mobility, and pain. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R27 had severe cognitive impairment, had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) used tweezers to remove a blackhead on Resident (R)19's back without instruction or supervision from a licensed nurse, and the facility further failed to provide a dressing change to R31's wrist when sanguineous drainage (leakage of fresh blood) seeped through the dressing. This placed the residents at risk for inappropriate skin care and related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R19 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), sebaceous cyst (a small, slow-growing, noncancerous bump beneath the skin), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction charactered by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear, and polyneuropathy (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to monitor and provide pain medication to Resident (R)16, who had severe pain in her shoulder after an incident with the sit to stand lift. This placed the resident at risk for prolonged pain. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R16 recorded diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), muscle weakness, and pain. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R16 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of three staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting; R16 did not ambulate. The MDS further documented R16 rarely had pain and received non medication interventions for pain. The Pain Interview Assessment, dated 05/23/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial (interrelation of social factors and individual thought and behavior) well-being when staff failed to provide Resident (R)2 with mental health services when reporting suicidal ideations. This placed R2 residents at risk for unmet mental health care needs. Findings included: -The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R2 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), chronic pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity, difficulty or discomfort in breathing), altered mental status, chronic atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat), need of assistance with personal care, and urinary tract infection (UTI). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to identify and provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of two sampled residents, Resident (R) 2 who had reported suicidal ideations and lacked social service involvement, and R23 who reported wanting to die and social services was not aware of reported concern. This placed the residents at risk for further decline of their emotional and mental well-being. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R2 had diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), chronic pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity, difficulty or discomfort in breathing), altered mental status, chronic atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide physician ordered medications for lack of bowel movements, and failed to contact the physician for one resident, Resident (R) 13, who had a history of constipation. This placed the resident at risk for impaction. Findings inlcuded: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R13 documented diagnoses of constipation (difficulty passing stool), chronic pain (pain that carries on for longer than 12 weeks despite medication or treatment), major depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness), hypertension (high blood pressure), and iron deficiency (too little iron in the body). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R13 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility, transfers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 41 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility kitchen staff failed to provide food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, when dietary staff failed to follow a recipe while preparing a pureed (texture-modified diet in which all food to have a soft, pudding like consistency) diet for one resident in the Cottonwood Household and failed to prepare foods by methods that conserve palatable and nutritive value by serving beef steak at incorrect temperature and the nutritive value by omitting a vegetable serving to two residents who received pureed diets in the Sunflower Household. This placed the resident's at risk for unmet dietary needs and at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 08/29/23 at 12:31 PM, observation revealed Dietary Staff CC prepare the pureed meal for one resident. DS CC blended in an industrial blender, a beef cube steak, two unmeasured scoops of brown gravy and unmeasured amount of milk. Continued observation revealed DS CC did not obtain a temperature of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 41 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was maintained in safe operating condition. This placed the residents who used the lift at risk for preventable accidents. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R16 recorded diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), muscle weakness, and pain. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R16 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of three staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting; R16 did not ambulate. The MDS further documented R16 rarely had pain and received non medication interventions for pain. The Pain Care Plan, dated 06/09/23, initiated on 08/02/21, documented R16 had chronic pain and directed staff to administer pain medication, reposition R16, and monitor for response to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for the 34 residents who received their meals from the facility kitchen. This placed the 34 residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 03/14/22 at 10:22 AM, observation revealed in the two door refrigerator labeled (kitchen) a metal pan with bagged scrambled and boiled eggs, with packages of sliced ham, and sausage on top of the eggs on the top shelf. On 03/14/22 at 11:31 AM, observation revealed in the walk in refrigerator in the kitchen three five pound (lb) low fat cottage cheese containers with an expiration date of 03/12/22. On 03/14/22 at 11:56 AM, observation revealed the following: A kitchen ceiling vent by the storage room had blackish lint. The kitchen cabinets had numerous areas with dried food drippings. All around the kitchen the mopboard had brownish gray grime approximately 2 inches x 2 inches. The inside kitchen door had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents of which four were reviewed for respiratory care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services for Resident (R) 1, R5, R19, and R27, when staff stored their uncovered nebulizer masks on top of their nebulizer machines. This placed R1, R5, R19, and R27 at increased risk for complications and respiratory infection. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented she had diagnoses of shortness of breath, chronic atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heart beat ), and congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). R1's Significant Change Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident required total staff assistance with locomotion off the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents of which two were reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to treat Resident (R) 3 and R1 with respect and dignity during care, placing the residents at risk for embarrassment and an undignified environment. Findings included: - R3's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 02/11/22, recorded diagnosis of left femur fracture (broken hip bone), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and type 2 diabetes mellitus ( a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). R3's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had severely impaired cognition, required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, and transfers. R3 had functional impairment in the left lower extremity, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Incontinence Care Plan, dated 02/17/22, directed the staff to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) for Resident (R) 3. This placed the resident at risk for elevated blood sugars and adverse side effects. Findings included: - R3's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 02/11/22, recorded diagnosis of left femur fracture (broken hip bone), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R3 had severely impaired cognition, required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and had functional impairment in the left lower extremity. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/17/22, recorded R3's cognition fluctuated and R3 had poor decision making skills. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with interventions to prevent skin breakdown for one sampled resident, Resident (R) 20, who had a Stage 2 (partial thickness loss) pressure ulcer. This placed R20 at risk for further skin breakdown. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R20 documented diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbance (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), delusional disorder (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue), and Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). R20's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with three reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate cares to prevent shearing when repositioning for one sampled resident, Resident R (1), placing the resident at risk for skin injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), chronic pain (persistent pain that lasts weeks to years and may be caused by inflammation or dysfunctional nerves), vitamin deficiency (a condition of a long-term lack of a vitamin), atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), and fracture of the right humerus (upper arm bone is broken). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 12/22/21, documented the resident had intact cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for one of the five sampled residents, Resident (R) 3 who recently had a hip fracture (broken bone). This placed the resident at risk for further accidents. Findings included: - R3's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 02/11/22, recorded diagnosis of left femur fracture (broken hip bone), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning),and type 2 diabetes mellitus ( a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R3 had severely impaired cognition, required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and had functional impairment in the left lower extremity. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/17/22, recorded R3's cognition fluctuated and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with four reviewed for nutrition. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary nutritional assessments and treatment for weight loss for one of four residents, Resident (R) 31. This placed the resident at risk for further weight loss and decline. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R31 documented diagnoses of dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), small cell carcinoma of the lung (an aggressive fast growing cancer that forms in tissues of the lung and can spread to other parts of the body), hypothyroidism (condition characterized by hyperactivity of the thyroid gland), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, emptiness, and hopelessness). R31's Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated 02/03/22, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported irregularities regarding Resident (R) 3's antidiabetic medications (medication to stabilize blood sugar) and the lack of associated blood sugar monitoring. This placed R3 at risk for adverse outcomes including hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). Findings included: - R3's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 02/11/22, recorded diagnosis of left femur fracture (broken hip bone), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and type 2 diabetes mellitus ( a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R3 had severely impaired cognition, required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and had functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor blood sugar for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 3 who received routine antidiabetic medications (medication to stabilize blood sugar). This placed R3 at risk for adverse medication side effects. Findings included: - R3's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 02/11/22, recorded diagnosis of left femur fracture (broken hip bone), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R3 had severely impaired cognition, required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and had functional impairment in the left lower extremity. The Cognitive Loss Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 34 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to exercise adequate infection control measures when they failed to utilize proper hand hygiene and failed to handle soiled trash appropriately during direct care for Resident (R) 3. The facility further failed to ensure staff used adequate personal protective equipment while administering an insulin (a medication to stabilize blood glucose) injection. This placed the affected residents at increased risk for infectious disease and illness. Findings included: - R3's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 02/11/22, recorded diagnosis of left femur fracture (broken hip bone), dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), and type 2 diabetes mellitus ( a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar). R3's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had severely impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$75,463 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $13,039 — penalty dated 2024-06-03
- $12,035 — penalty dated 2024-03-04
- $24,863 — penalty dated 2023-11-28
- $25,526 — penalty dated 2023-08-31
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-28 for 2 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GRACE TEAM SERVICES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOPSIDE MANOR INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 03/20/2019 |
| DRENNAN, JACQUE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 04/01/2025 |
| HOUSE, GENNIFER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/20/2019 |
| MERSCH, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/20/2019 |
| RASURE, RICHARD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/20/2019 |
| SCHILLING, RON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| BLAND & ASSOCIATES, P.C. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| GRACE TEAM LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2019 |
| GT SERVICES LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/06/2025 |
| MEDNOW STAFFING, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| OPENWORK HEALTH LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| DAISE, TRAVIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| GRACE, RYAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2019 |
| HUEBERT, ERIC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2019 |
| MCTAGUE, DAPHNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| COUNTY OF SHERMAN | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/31/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175361. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.