Sterling Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 27.9 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.22 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.56 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with seven reviewed for falls. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow two residents' care plans: Resident (R) 128, who sustained a tibia (bone of the lower leg) fracture (break) during ambulation, and R4, who slid off the bed while on a bed pan. This placed the residents at risk for further falls and avoidable injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R128 documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (high blood pressure), and pain. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R128 had severely impaired cognition. R128 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with four reviewed for accidents/falls. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to use an appropriate lift sling during a mechanical lift transfer, which resulted in Resident (R) 6 falling out of a lift sling resulting in a head laceration, hematoma (collection of blood under the skin from an injury), and pain. The facility further failed to implement new interventions to prevent further falls for R14, who had multiple falls. This placed the residents at risk for further falls and fall-related injury. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's (progressive mental deterioration that can occur in middle or old age, due to generalized degeneration of the brain), osteoporosis (medical condition in which the bones become brittle and fragile from loss of tissue), osteoarthritis (degeneration of joint cartilage and the underlying bone), spinal stenosis (when the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time certified dietary manager for the 26 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen. This placed the residents at risk for inadequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 01/22/24, a review of the noon meal consisted of meatloaf, peas, mashed potatoes, and gravy On 01/22/24 at 11:00 AM, observation revealed Dietary Staff BB in the kitchen overseeing the preparation of the noon meal. On 01/21/24 at 08:28 AM, Dietary Staff BB verified he was not a Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). Dietary Staff BB stated he did not want to be a CDM, had 30 years of food service experience, and had agreed to overlook the kitchen until the facility hired one. On 01/22/24 at 01:55 PM, Administrative Staff A verified Dietary Staff BB had no dietary manager certification. The facility's Dietician Policy, revised 11/2022, documented that If a dietician was not employed full-time (35 or more hours per week)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food by professional standards for food service safety in the facility kitchen. This placed the residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchens at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 01/21/24 at 09:45 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed a two-door refrigerator had three unlabeled undated orange jello and two cottage cheese Styrofoam cups. On 01/21/24 at 08:50 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) BB verified the above finding and stated staff should label and date food before they place it in the refrigerator. DS BB discarded the items into the trash can. On 01/22/24 at 10:30 AM, observation in the kitchen revealed the following: A white upright freezer located in the hall between the kitchen and dry storage had a five-gallon container, approximately ¼ full of orange sherbert with numerous different areas of dried orange substance on the outside of the container. An area on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a water management program for waterborne pathogens including Legionella disease (Legionella is a bacterium that can cause pneumonia in vulnerable populations). This placed the residents in the facility at risk for infectious disease. Findings included: - On 01/22/25 at 02:51 PM, Maintenance Staff U stated he did not have any type of diagram of the facility's water system or a water management program in place to prevent the growth of Legionella or any other water-borne pathogen. On 01/23/25 at 03:30 PM, Administrative Staff A stated she was unaware that Maintenance Staff U did not have a water management program in place. The facility's Legionella Water Management Program policy, dated 07/17, documented the facility had a water management program that was overseen by the water management team. The water management program included a Legionella Risk Assessment, a detailed description, and diagram of the water system in the facility. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) reviewed each resident's drug regimen monthly and reported irregularities to the attending physician, the facility medical director, and the director of nursing monthly for Residents' (R) 4, R8, R9, R11, and R22. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that R9 had diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness), psychotic disturbance (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception), and mood disturbance (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, and wanting to die were more intense and persistent than what may normally be felt from time to time). R9's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 10/25/24, documented R9 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 26 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with one reviewed for hydration. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor Resident (R) 4's physician-ordered fluid restriction. This placed the resident at risk of complications related to fluid overload. Finding included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF - a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), edema (swelling resulting from an excessive accumulation of fluid in the body tissues), diabetes mellitus (DM - when the body cannot use glucose, no enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), hypertension (high blood pressure), and pain. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R4 had intact cognition. R4 required supervision with mobility, transfers, ambulation, and set-up assistance with eating. R4 had upper functional impairment on one side, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 26 residents. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure three of five Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) completed their required 12-hour annual in-service. This placed the residents at risk for receiving unskilled care. Findings included: - On 01/22/23, a review of CNA M, CNA N, and Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R and CMA S's annual in-service hours lacked evidence the staff had the required 12 hours of in-service training. On 01/22/24 at 09:30 AM, Administrative Staff A verified the facility lacked documentation the above staff completed their required 12-hour in-services. The Facility Assessment, revised July 31, 2024, documented the facility would ensure the continuing competence of nurse aides and annual required 12-hour in-services. The facility's Inservice Training, Nurse Aide Policy, revised in August 2022, documented the facility would complete a performance review of nurse aides every 12 months. Annual in-services ensure the continuing competency of nurse aides and are no less than 12 hours per employment year. The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary condition for 36 residents who resided in the facility and received meals from the facility kitchen, placing them at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: - On 12/28/22 at 08:10 AM, during initial tour of the kitchen observations revealed the following: In the three-door stainless steel refrigerator in the kitchen had a large container of low-fat cottage cheese with a use by date of 12/15/22 and one and a half large blocks of cream cheese with a use by date of 11/05/22. Dietary Staff (DS) BB removed the items and discarded them. The east nurse's station commons area black residential refrigerator had an uncovered bowl of white gravy and fruit, and a small container of sour cream with a use by date of 12/24/22. Items were discarded by staff. The facility Food Receiving and Storage policy, dated 11/2022, documented all foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer would be covered,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-04 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents with two reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide bed hold notices for two sampled Residents (R) 1 and R30, or their representatives when the resident was sent to the hospital. This deficient practice placed R1 and R30 at risk to not be allowed to return to his/her former room at the facility. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), atrial fibrillation (irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow), hypertension (high blood pressure), heart attack, and diabetes (disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine). The 5 Day Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for Resident (R) 9 after falls and development of a pressure ulcer and R14 after falls. This placed the residents at risk for uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), lymphedema (localized swelling of the body caused by an abnormal accumulation of lymph), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and generalized anxiety disorder (condition of excessive worry about everyday issues and situations). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R9 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS documented R9 required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 36 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU -injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure on the skin). Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services in a timely manner after the development of a pressure ulcer for one of two sampled Residents (R) 9. This placed the resident at risk for delayed healing and further pressure injury. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), lymphedema (localized swelling of the body caused by an abnormal accumulation of lymph), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which actual. depth of the ulcer is completely obscured by slough [yellow, tan, gray, green, or brown]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,206 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $24,206 — penalty dated 2025-01-23

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GRACE TEAM SERVICES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS