Wheat State Manor
601 S Main St, Whitewater, KS 67154 · Non profit - Corporation · 65 certified beds · (316) 799-2181 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Sep 2023
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $7,960 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-13)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.5% | 17.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 4.9% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 5.9% | 1.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 2.9% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.5% | 6.5% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.9% | 4.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 42.4% | 16.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 32.9% | 23.2% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.3% | 95.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 32.9% | 22.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.2% | 18.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.76 | 1.80 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.35 | 2.13 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.6%CMS range 5.2–15.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.75 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 27.2 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2023-09-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — widespreadRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 46 residents with seven selected for review and one resident reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the residents from verbal abuse from Licensed Nurse (LN) G. On the morning of 08/26/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M heard LN G threaten to hit Resident (R) 2 and CNA N heard LN G threaten R2 if she hit her again, she would be sorry. CNA N failed to report the verbal abuse and CNA M reported the verbal abuse to LN H. LN H failed to notify Administrative Nurse D. LN G worked three shifts after the verbal abuse on 08/26/23, 08/27/23, and 08/28/23 until Administrative Nurse D was made aware of the occurrence on 08/31/23. Failure to report the verbal abuse to Administrative Nurse D immediately placed all residents in the facility in immediate jeopardy. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab for R2 included a diagnosis of Huntington's disease (rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-08 · tag F0620 — widespreadNot require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to establish and implement an admissions agreement that protected residents' right to personal property when the facility's admission agreement, signed by residents or their representatives at time of admission, asked the resident to waive facility responsibility for loss of personal property while being a resident in the facility.Findings included:- The facility's admission and Care Agreement revealed under Resident's Valuables on page eight, the Care Center maintains a secure area where personal articles of small size and limited dollar value may be stored. It is agreed by all parties that money, jewelry, documents, furs, and other personal articles of significant monetary value which are brought into the Care Center by the resident and third parties are in violation of the paragraph and shall not be the responsibility of the Care Center. During an interview on 01/08/26 at 09:45 AM, Administrative Staff A stated the admission Agreement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use adequate hand hygiene when caring for residents including during a dressing change and intravenous (IV-administered directly into the bloodstream via a vein) treatment. Findings included:- On 01/07/26 at 11:46 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) I obtained scissors from the desk and other dressing supplies from the cart. Without cleaning the scissors, LN I entered Resident (R) 33's room, washed her hands, and applied gloves. LN I removed R33's sock and removed the old bandage. LN I poured normal saline into a cup with gauze and washed the wound. Wearing the same soiled gloves, LN I applied normal saline to a Hydrofera Blue (a type of moist wound dressing which provides wound protection and addresses bacteria and yeast), cut it to size and placed it on the wound, then placed the Optifoam dressing (a multi-layered, silicone-bordered foam dressing for advanced wound care, used for partial to full-thickness wounds with moderate drainage,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement an effective antibiotic stewardship program that included an effective system to monitor antibiotic use, and/or an effective system to track and trend infections in the building for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). Findings included:- During an interview on 01/08/26 at 2:25 PM, Administrative Staff D stated at the time the facility did not have an effective infection control program, which included an Antibiotic Stewardship Program. Administrative Nurse D stated she was working on starting logs but had not started them yet. Administrative Nurse D stated the doctor tried to enforce the McGeer criteria (a set of surveillance definitions for infections in long-term care facilities) for documenting the appropriateness of antibiotics, but acknowledged if a resident saw another doctor, they would give what the other doctor prescribed, even if it did not meet the criteria. The Policies and Procedures- Infection Prevention and Control, undated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 31 residents over four resident halls. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an adequate resident call system when the two call light visual display monitors, which were the only alert system for resident bedroom and bathroom call lights, were left unmonitored resulting in extended call light response times. Finding included:- Observation on 01/06/26 at 07:55 AM revealed an egressed nurse station on the 200-hall. A display monitor on the station displayed call requests. There was no staff present at the station. Observation on 01/06/26 at 07:56 AM revealed another egressed nurse station on the 400-hall. A display monitor on the station displayed call requests. There was no staff present at the station. Observation on 01/07/26 at 01:13 PM in the egressed nurse station on the 200-hall revealed there was no staff present at the station. Observation on 01/07/26 at 01:13 PM in the egressed nurse station on the 400-hall revealed there was no staff present at the station. The call light display monitor showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 31 residents, the sample included 12 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 6, R2, R4, R5 and R28 and/or their representative regarding the risks related to psychotropic (alters mood or thoughts) medications. Findings included:- Review of both Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and paper records revealed the following: 1. R6's EMR under the Orders tab revealed orders for the following:Sertraline HCL (an antidepressant medication), 150 milligrams (mg) one time a day for depression, dated 08/14/25.R8's scanned documents in the EMR did not contain consent forms for the above listed medications and lacked evidence of informed consent. 2. R2's EMR Orders tab revealed orders for the following:Bupropion oral tablet extended release 24-hour (a medication used to treat anxiety and depression), 150 mg by mouth one time a day related to generalized anxiety disorder.Lemborexant (a medication used to treat sleeplessness), 5 mg every 24 hours as needed for insomnia (inability to sleep) for 30 days each night as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-08 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 31 residents, the sample included 12 residents. The facility failed to allow and facilitate residents to exercise dining preferences related to timing of receiving room trays and eating in the room versus the main dining area. Findings included:- Observed on 01/06/26 at 12:13 PM, Resident (R) 14 received his lunch tray in his room. R14 received chicken noodle soup. The bowel had a clear wrap and foil over it. R14 reported the soup was barely warm. During an interview on 01/06/26 at 11:15 AM, R6 reported he now goes to the dining room to eat because it would take a long time to get his food in his room, and the food would not be hot, but he preferred to eat in his room. During an interview on 01/06/26 at 12:06 PM, R14 reported he started eating in the dining room because it took a long time to get his food to his room, and the food would not be hot, and his lunch would not arrive until after 12:00 PM. R14 further stated the residents who ate in their rooms ate last, after the kitchen closed. During an interview on 01/06/26 at 12:29 PM, R9 reported he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 31 residents; the sample included 12 residents. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to protect the dignity of resident (R) 8; when he was transferred through the facility without a dignity cover on his urine collection bag, leaving his urine visible to other residents and visitors. Findings included:- The Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R8 included the diagnoses of: benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH-non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections), overactive bladder (a sudden, uncontrollable urge to urinate, often leading to frequent bathroom trips and sometimes urine leakage), and urinary retention (lack of ability to urinate and empty the bladder). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents with three residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold and written notification transfer for Resident (R) 30. The facility additionally failed to notify the Office of the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO). This placed the resident at risk for impaired rights related to returning to the facility. Findings included:- R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), and the presence of a cardiac pacemaker (an implanted device to regulate the beating of the heart). R30's Discharge with Expected Return Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 11/09/25 had not documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS). The health conditions section documented R30 had shortness of breath or trouble breathing at rest and with exertion. R30's Care Plan documented on 10/21/25 R30 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 31 residents. The sample included five residents with five residents sampled for quality of care. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services for no pressure related skin issues for Resident (R) 33 when staff failed to change the dressing as ordered by the physician. Findings included:- R33's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), and depression (a mood disorder which causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). R33's 11/21/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS recorded R33 had no wounds or treatments. R33's Admission/re-admission Data Collection - V 4.0 dated 01/01/26 for R33's readmission documented a wound to the bottom of R33's left foot. R33's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 31 residents; the sample included 12 residents with six reviewed for accident hazards. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards for Resident (R)11 when staff did not ensure the resident had a call light within reach and propelled the residents in a wheelchair without foot pedals. Findings included:- R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) and osteoporosis (chronic arthritis without inflammation). R11's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS recorded she had behaviors and wandered during the observation period. R11 required staff assistance with activities of daily living. The MDS noted she had two or more falls since the last assessment, one resulting in an injury.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility identified a census of 32 residents. The sample included 12 residents including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to monitor bowel movements for Resident (R) 2 and follow the physician orders to administer medications for constipation after a 13 day interval with no bowel movements documented. Findings included:- R2's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented diagnoses, which included constipation (difficulty passing stools) and pain due to acute trauma. R2's 12/17/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS noted R2 was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowels. R2 was dependent on the staff for care. The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R2 was admitted from the hospital following a motor vehicle incident with multiple fractures. R2 had functional limited range of motion to her right arm and both legs. She needed maximum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility had a census of 31 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors for Resident (R) 2, R4, and R6, who did not receive medications as ordered. Findings included:1. R2's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented diagnoses which included constipation (difficulty passing stools), pain due to acute trauma, and multiple fractures, including to the face, both legs, right arm, and spine.R2's 12/17025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. R2 was dependent on the staff for care. R2 took an anticoagulant (a class of medications used to prevent the blood from clotting) medication,The Functional Abilities (Self-Care and Mobility) Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R2 was admitted from the hospital following a motor vehicle incident with multiple fractures and injuries. R2 had limited range of motion to her right arm and both legs. She needed maximum assistance with toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-11 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 38 residents with three residents reviewed for Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Resident (R) 40, R95 and R 96 received the Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) form 10123 (for the right of expedited review of discontinuation of services) as required when skilled services ended. In addition, the facility failed to issue CMS 10055 (the right to continue skilled services and cost of the services) to R40 as required. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R) 40's medical record revealed skilled therapy discharged the resident on 12/21/23. The facility contacted the responsible party by phone but did not issue the required CMS 10123 or CMS 10055. The resident remained in the facility and was placed on hospice services 01/02/24. Review of R95's medical record, revealed skilled services ended 10/18/23, and the facility issued CMS 10055 to the resident's responsible party by email on 10/23/23. The facility did not issue CMS 10123 as required.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-11 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 38 residents with five residents reviewed for Covid-19 vaccinations. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents of the facility received up to date Covid vaccinations, if desired, and failed to ensure residents were given the opportunity to rescind previous year declination. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)32's medical record immunization tab, revealed the resident received a Covid vaccination on 11/17/22 and no Covid vaccine offered in 2023. Review of R 20's medical record immunization tab revealed the resident refused the covid booster on 11/13/21 , with no opportunity to change declination in 2022 and 2023. Review of R5's medical record Immunization tab, revealed the resident received a Covid booster 11/17/22 and no Covid vaccine offered in 2023. Review of R3's medical record Immunization tab, revealed the resident received a Covid vaccination 11/17/22 , and no Covid vaccine offered in 2023. Review of R2's medical record Immunization tab, revealed the resident declined Covid vaccination 01/26/21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 13 residents selected for review, which included one Resident (R)20, reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level two. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a reassessment for R20 to determine mental health needs as required. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)20's medical record, revealed diagnoses that included schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication and fragmentation of thought) with psychotic disorder (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception), delusions (untrue persistent belief or perception held by a person although evidence shows it was untrue), hallucinations (sensing things while awake that appear to be real, but the mind created), and osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 13 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one Resident (R)19 regarding the use of eyeglasses. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)19's electronic medical record (EMR) included a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The resident required glasses for her vision. The Visual Function Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/27/23, did not trigger. The Quarterly MDS, dated 01/26/24, did not assess cognition or vision. The care plan, revised 02/01/24, lacked staff instruction on the resident's use of eyeglasses. On 03/06/24 at 10:39 AM, the resident stated her glasses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 13 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for vision. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)19 received adequate assistive devices to maintain proper vision, by failing to have her glasses repaired in a timely manner. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)19's electronic medical record (EMR) included a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The resident required glasses for her vision. The Visual Function Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/27/23, did not trigger. The Quarterly MDS, dated 01/26/24, did not assess cognition or vision. The care plan, revised 02/01/24, lacked staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 13 residents selected for review, which included five residents selected for review for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)13 received reevaluation for continued use of as needed (PRN) psychotropic (medication that alters mood or thought) , and R11 related to lack of an abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) to monitor for adverse effects of antipsychotic medications. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)13's medical record, revealed diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), aphasia(condition with disordered or absent language function), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 39 residents with 16 residents sampled, which included three residents for pressure ulcer/injury. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to change gloves and perform proper hand hygiene between phases of wound care for Resident (R)2 and R3. This deficient practice has the potential to lead to cross contamination between residents and negatively affect the residents that resided in the facility. Findings include: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for Resident (R)2 revealed the following pertinent medical diagnoses that included anemia (a condition without enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues) and pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) of the right buttock. The admission Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 39 residents, with three residents sampled. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident/resident's representative for Resident (R) 8, the right to be fully informed, in advance, of the risks and benefits of proposed care (initiation of antipsychotic [class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions] and of treatment and treatment alternatives, as well as the right to choose options/treatments. On 11/14/23, R8's provider ordered Rexulti (atypical antipsychotic medicine for depression and agitation that may happen with dementia due to Alzheimer's disease) and failed to notify the resident's representative of the new order for the Rexulti. Findings included: - The signed Physician Order Sheet (POS), for Resident (R) 8, dated 11/07/23, revealed the following diagnoses; major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion caused by a decreased blood flow to the brain)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 39 residents, with one resident reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)1, received the physician's ordered medication of Fentanyl patch (a controlled medication patch used for severe pain), when staff applied Fentanyl 200 micrograms (mcg), when the physician ordered 112 mcg. The facility failed to notify the physician, perform any necessary clinical interventions, record the medication as given in the clinical record, observe, assess outcome of the elder and document in the clinical record, record any actions, clinical interventions necessary, report the error on the incident report and record notification of family in clinical record with any stated response, education and questions. Facility staff also failed to notify the facility administrative staff. Findings included: - The signed Physician Order Sheet (POS), for Resident (R) 1, dated 10/05/23, revealed the following diagnoses; quadriplegia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 46 residents with seven selected for review and one resident reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the residents from verbal abuse from Licensed Nurse (LN) G. On the morning of 08/26/23, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M heard LN G threaten to hit Resident (R) 2 and CNA N heard LN G threaten R2 if she hit her again, she would be sorry. CNA N failed to report the verbal abuse and CNA M reported the verbal abuse to LN H. LN H failed to notify Administrative Nurse D. LN G worked three shifts after the verbal abuse on 08/26/23, 08/27/23, and 08/28/23 until Administrative Nurse D was made aware of the occurrence on 08/31/23. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab for R2 included a diagnosis of Huntington's disease (rare abnormal hereditary condition characterized by progressive mental deterioration; a disabling central nervous system movement disorder). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R2 lacked a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff proactively followed the principles of antibiotic stewardship to ensure antibiotics were used in a safe and effective manner to prevent adverse effects of antibiotics to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Review of the February 2022 Infection and Antibiotic Start Log revealed an entry for resident (R)33 whom received treatment of Nitrofurantoin on 02/14/22 for urinary tract infection. The log indicated a urinalysis and culture and sensitivity was sent on 02/14/22 and staff followed up with the culture results at 48 and 72 hours. The staff documented the bacteria as klebsiella pneumoniea with date of final results documented as 04/16/22. A comment indicated the resident was put on Cipro due to culture results. The log lacked documentation that the resident received 10 doses of an ineffective antibiotic. Review of R 33's medical record revealed the following Physician Orders: A Physician's Order, dated 02/14/22, instructed staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 15 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy to enhance two dependent Residents (R)36 and R 42, dignity while performing perineal hygiene cares. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)42 electronic medical record (EMR), under the Med Diag tab, included: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for toilet use. The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 15 selected for review. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one of the 15 residents (R12) when the resisdent slept in and staff failed to administer morning medications as ordered by the physician. Findings included: - R12's Physician Orders, dated 03/10/221 instructed staff to administer the following medications to the resident: Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) daily original order dated 08/03/21. Carvedilol 6.25 mg twice a day for hypertension, original order date 08/03/21. Claritin 10 mg daily in morning for allergies, original order date 01/14/22. Famotidine 20 mg two times a day for gastric reflux, original order date 12/03/21. Haloperidol 0.5 mg two times a day for agitation original order dated 12/02/21. Simvastatin 20 mg, daily for hyperlipidemia, original order date 08/03/21. The Care Plan, reviewed 02/10/22, Instructed staff the resident required assistance of one to two persons for activities of daily living. Staff used a mechanical lift for transfers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 15 selected for review, with three reviewed for activities of daily living. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bathing, grooming and oral care for one resident (R)12, of the three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings included: - Review of resident (R)12's Physician Order Sheet, dated 03/10/22, revealed diagnoses included hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebra vascular disease (stroke), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function) , dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with behavioral disturbance and delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation and restlessness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severe cognitive deficit, with physical behavior directed toward others on one to three days, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 15 residents included in the sample, including two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU). Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to reposition one Resident (R)42 timely to prevent the development of PUs and failed to appropriately change the dressing for R 10's pressure ulcer. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)42 electronic medical record (EMR), under the Med Diag tab, included: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating severe cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and transfers and had no impairment in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 15 selected for review with two residents reviewed for restorative services/range of motion. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one of the two residents, (R)12 with a finger positioning device to assist in maintaining anatomical alignment of this resident's hand. Findings included: - Review of resident (R)12's Physician Order Sheet, dated 03/10/22, revealed diagnoses included hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) following cerebra vascular disease (stroke), aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function) , dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with behavioral disturbance and delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation and restlessness). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severe cognitive deficit, with physical behavior directed toward…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 15 residents sampled, including four residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep one dependent Resident (R)14 safe while drinking hot coffee, failed to safely propel one dependent resident R36 in a wheelchair, and failed to initiate interventions following two falls for R 36. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)14's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Med Diag tab, included: acquired absence of left and right legs below the knee and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating severely impaired cognition. She required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and supervision for eating. She had impairment in functional range of motion (ROM) on both sides of her upper extremities. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 15 residents sampled, including four residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate peri-care for two Residents (R)33 and R 36 to prevent urinary tract infections and failed to provide catheter care appropriately to prevent urinary tract infections for one R 37. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)37's electronic medical record (EMR), under the Med Diag tab, included: dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) and benign prostatic hyperplasia/hypertrophy (BPH) non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency and urinary tract infections). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He had an indwelling urinary catheter (a tube to drain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 15 selected for review and 6 reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately administer physician ordered medications for one of the six sampled residents, (R)12, on at least seven occasions. Findings included: - R12's Physician Orders, dated 03/10/221 instructed staff to administer the following medications to the resident: Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) daily original order dated 08/03/21. Carvedilol 6.25 mg twice a day for hypertension, original order date 08/03/21. Claritin 10 mg daily in morning for allergies, original order date 01/14/22. Famotidine 20 mg two times a day for gastric reflux, original order date 12/03/21. Haloperidol 0.5 mg two times a day for agitation original order dated 12/02/21. Simvastatin 20 mg, daily for hyperlipidemia, original order date 08/03/21. Observation, on 04/20/22 at 09:35 AM, revealed Certified Medication Aide (CMA) T, administered to the resident the following crushed medications in chocolate syrup: aspirin 81 milligrams…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents with six selected for review for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely and follow up on the pharmacist recommendations for two of the six residents reviewed, including resident (R) 33and 13. Findings included: - Review of resident (R)33's Physician Order Sheet, dated 03/10/22, revealed diagnosis included urinary tract infection (UTI,) dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), muscle weakness, diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), pain, and arteriosclerotic heart disease (ASHD; disease of the arteries of the heart,) hypertension (HTN; elevated blood pressure). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severe cognitive impairment with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 15 selected for review which included six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor physician ordered daily weights for one of the six sampled residents (R)28 to determine appropriate administration need for Lasix (a medication used to remove fluid from the body) as needed, per the physician's order. Findings included: - Review of resident (R)28's Physician Order Sheet, dated 03/15/22, revealed diagnoses included cardiac arrhythmia with pacemaker insertion (irregular heartbeat), coronary artery disease, hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and stroke. A Physician's Order, dated 12/08/21, instructed staff to administer Lasix (medication to remove excess fluid) 40 milligrams (mg) every 24 hours as needed for a five-pound weight gain in 24 hours or for a 10-pound weight gain in one week. Administer with 20 mEq (milliequivalents) of potassium chloride. Review of the February 2022 Medication Administration Record and Treatment Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents with six residents selected for unnecessary medication use. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed psychotropic medications did not exceed the 14-day administration without physician reevaluation, specification of target symptoms, and duration, for two of the six residents (R)33 and R13. Findings included: - Review of resident (R)33's Physician Order Sheet, dated 03/10/22, revealed diagnosis included urinary tract infection, dementia(progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety disorder(mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), muscle weakness, diabetes(when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), pain, and arteriosclerotic heart disease (disease of the arteries of the heart). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with severe cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-01-08 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 31 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing sheets included accurate and identifiable information to include the actual hours worked, as required. Findings included:- Observed on 01/06/26 at 08:20 AM, the posted staffing sheet lacked the actual hours worked Observed on 01/07/26 at 09:30 AM, the posted staffing sheet lacked the actual hours worked. Observed on 01/08/26 at 10:30 AM, the posted staffing sheet lacked the actual hours worked. Review of the daily staffing sheets from 12/25/25 and 01/05/25 revealed the staffing sheets lacked the actual hours worked. During an interview on 01/08/26 at 08:20 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated the posted staffing sheet should have documented an accurate census, the total number of medical staff per shift, and should also have documented the actual hours and total hours worked. The facility policy Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, dated 08/2022, documented the staffing sheet of staff who were directly responsible for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-03-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
The facility reported a census of 38 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to display accurate, publicly accessible, and identifiable staffing information, daily, for the 38 residents who reside in the facility. Findings included: - Review of the facility's Daily Staffing Sheets, from 02/11/24 through 03/11/24, revealed the actual hours worked had not been completed on the daily staffing sheets. On 03/11/24 at 11:33 AM, Administrative Nurse D stated, she was unaware the actual hours worked were to be included on the daily staffing sheets. The facility policy for Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised August/2022, included: The information recorded on the form shall include the actual time worked during the shift for each category and type of nursing staff. The facility failed to properly complete the daily staffing sheets for the residents of the facility.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$7,960 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $7,960 — penalty dated 2023-09-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GRACE TEAM SERVICES — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 4.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMITH, JASON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2014 |
| PARKER, MADISON | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 02/09/2022 |
| GRACE TEAM LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in KS
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175451. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.