No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Delmar Gardens Of Lenexa

9701 Monrovia Street, Lenexa, KS 66215 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 222 certified beds · (913) 492-1130 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (913) 492-1130 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Mar 2026
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (25) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
12200 W 106th St · (913) 227-0506 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
11501 W 97th St · (913) 905-0286 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
11500 W 90th St · (913) 541-2021 · Call to confirm hours
Park
9670 Halsey St · (913) 888-1500 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.9%17.9%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.6%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.0%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.4%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.2%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.5%23.2%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine85.0%95.5%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%4.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.4%22.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.4%18.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.6%1.9%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine42.4%73.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission33.3%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.5%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.101.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.862.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.6%CMS range 38.5–58.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.4%CMS range 10.3–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge39.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.2%CMS range 4.4–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
0.79
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.90
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 222 beds and averages 167.5 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.90 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-18)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-27)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide R1's durable power of attorney (DPOA- a legal document that names a person to make healthcare decisions when the resident is no longer able to) with the Medicare Liability Notice, CMS 101123- Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) prior to the last day of skilled coverage on 05/21/2026. Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home to his independent living apartment on 05/22/2026. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of acute kidney failure (inability of the kidneys to excrete waste, concentrate urine, and conserve electrolytes), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness). R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/24/2026 documented he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge plan in consideration with R1 and his Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA). The facility failed to ensure R1 safely discharged , including notifying his DPOA that he discharged and providing her with post-discharge instructions for R1. Findings included:- R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home to live independently on 05/22/2026. R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of acute kidney failure (inability of the kidneys to excrete waste, concentrate urine, and conserve electrolytes), dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), and cognitive communication deficit (an impairment in organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem-solving, and safety awareness). R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 04/24/2026, documented he had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, which indicated moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 162 residents, with 32 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of six medication carts observed were locked while unattended.This deficiency had the potential to affect 19 residents located on the 500 hallways and 29 residents located on the 600 hallways. Findings included:- On 03/16/2026 at 08:16 AM, an observation of an unlocked and unattended medication cart was in the 600 hallways for three minutes unattended; Licensed Nurse (LN) CC walked by and locked the medication cart and walked away. On 03/16/2026 at 08:53 AM, an observation of an unlocked unattended medication cart in the 600 hallways. At 08:55 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S returned to the unlocked medication cart checked on the computer and walked away from the unlocked medication cart and into a resident's room. CMA S returned to the unlocked medication cart two minutes later to prepare medications. On 03/16/26 at 11:37 AM, an observation of an unlocked and unattended medication cart in the 500 hallways for three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 162 residents. The sample included 32 residents with one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs related to call lights. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 98 call light was within her reach.Findings Included: - R98's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero, which indicated severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R98 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs).The Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 162 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for beneficiary notifications. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the appropriate Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) Form CMS-10055 for resident (R) 194.Findings included:-The facility provided documentation noted R195's Medicare Part A last covered day was 10/31/25. The resident remained in the facility. Form CMS-20052 (11/2017) was provided instead of Form CMS-10055. During an interview with Administrative Staff A on 03/18/26 at 09:46 AM, she stated the correct ABN form was not provided for R195. During an interview on 03/18/26 at 09:52 AM with Social Services X stated ABN Form CMS-10055 was not provided to R195. The undated Form Instructions Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) Form CMS-10055 (2024) policy was provided.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 162 residents. The sample included 32 residents. Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy of Resident (R) 10 and R96's personal and medical records. Findings included:- On 03/16/26 at 08:53 AM, observed an unattended medication cart in the 600 hallways. The computer screen was open with Personal Health Information (PHI) of R10's medication administration record displayed for four minutes. On 03/16/26 at 11:37 AM, observed a medication cart in 500 hallways unattended with PHI of R96, treatment orders displayed on the computer screen for over three minutes. On 03/16/26 at 08:57 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S reported that he should have closed the computer screen so no one could see R10's information. On 03/16/26 at 11:41 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) L reported she should have closed the computer screen to maintain confidentiality of residents' medical information.On 03/17/26 at 01:38 PM, Administrative Nurse D expected that all resident information on the computer should be protected by closing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 162 residents. The sample included 34 residents, with two reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility staff failed to identify a resident to resident altercation as potential abuse and report to the facility's Administrator as required. Findings included: - R62's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behaviors, Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure,) major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear.) R62's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R62 had severely impaired cognitive function. The MDS recorded R62 required extensive assistance with transfers, activities of daily living (ADL), and propelled in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 162 residents. The sample included 34 residents, with two reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to identify a resident to resident altercation as potential abuse and initiate an investigation. Findings included:- R62's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with behaviors, Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure,) major depressive disorder (major mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear.) R62's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded R62 had severely impaired cognitive function. The MDS recorded R62 required extensive assistance with transfers, activities of daily living (ADL), and propelled in a wheelchair. The MDS documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 162 residents; the sample included 32 residents with one resident reviewed for tube feeding (administration of nutritionally balanced liquefied foods or nutrients through a tube). Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 47s head of bed was elevated as his enteral feed formula was administered through R47's gastrostomy tube (G-tube: tube surgically placed through an artificial opening into the stomach) by a feeding pump. Additionally, the facility failed to administer R47's enteral feed by the physician's order. Findings included: - R47's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and dysphagia (swallowing difficulty). R47's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, which indicated severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 132 residents. The sample included 32 residents, with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 9s as needed diphenhydramine (an antihistamine used to treat allergy symptoms, hay fever, the common cold, insomnia, and motion sickness) medication order had a diagnosis or reason to administer medication. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R9 documented a diagnosis of insomnia (inability to sleep) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).R9's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/11/26 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. R9's MDS revealed she had no skin issues, and she was independent with her activities of daily living.R9's Psychotropic Drug Use Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented that R9 triggered CAA due to being prescribed psychotropic medications for anxiety that may increase the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 15 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 162 residents. Twenty-six medication administrations were observed. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent when five errors were identified, resulting in a medication error rate of 19.23 percent. Finding included:- R47's Physician Orders recorded an order for ferrous sulfate tablet (an iron supplement), administer 325 milligrams (mg) tablet by gastric tube (G-tube: tube surgically placed through an artificial opening into the stomach), once a day for anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), date ordered 03/10/26 R47's Physician Orders recorded an order for sennosides-docusate (used to prevent occasional constipation).Administer 1 tablet: 8.6-50 mg by gastric tube, twice a day, the order lacked a diagnosis, date ordered 03/10/26.R47's Physician Orders recorded an order for tamsulosin capsule (used to relieve symptoms such as difficulty urinating, weak stream, and urgency). Administer 1 capsule 0.4 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 162 residents. The sample included 32 residents. Based on interviews, observation and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing direct care to a Resident (R) 3 with a coccyx (distal tip of the spine/tail-bone) wound and while providing direct care to R 120 and R 101 with open and scabbed wounds. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure adequate hand hygiene before and after personal care for R 3, and while passing ice between residents. Furthermore, the facility failed to sanitize the mechanical lift between residents' use and maintain R6's catheter (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) tubing laid directly on the floor.Findings included:- On 03/16/26 at 09:40. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) H…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 151 residents. The sample included 31 residents. The facility had six medication carts. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date Resident (R)53's insulin (a hormone which allows cells throughout the body to uptake glucose) flex pen when opened and failed to discard R15 and R346's insulin flex pen and R01's insulin vial when outdated. The facility further failed to discard expired stock medications. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medications. Findings included: - On [DATE] at 08:15 AM, observation of the facility's 500 Nurse medication cart revealed the following: R53's Lantus (long-acting insulin) flex pen lacked an open date and discard date. R15 s Lantus flex pen opened date of [DATE] and discard date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 08:20 AM, observation of the facility's 600 Nurse medication cart revealed the following: R346's Levemir (long-acting insulin) flex pen lacked an open and discard date. R01's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 151 residents. The sample included 31 residents with one reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to treat Resident (R) 115 with dignity in one of five dining rooms, during the noon meal when staff stood over R115 while assisting him to eat. This placed the resident at risk for an undignified experience. Findings included: - On 03/25/24 at 11:39 AM, observation in the 300-hall dining room revealed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M served R115 a plate of food. CNA M stood over R115 and gave the resident bites of food. CNA M left the table several times during the noon meal to do other tasks and then returned to R115's table, stood over him, and gave him bites of food. On 03/25/24 at 12:05 PM, Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) BB stated staff should sit in a chair next to R115 when assisting him with eating, not stand over him. On 03/26/24 at 04:30 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated she expected staff to sit by the resident face to face when assisting the resident to eat. Administrative Nurse D stated staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 151 residents. The sample included 31 residents with four reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice for facility-initiated transfer to Resident (R) 68, R347, and R75 or their representatives, when they were transferred to the hospital. This placed the residents at risk for uninformed care choices. Findings included: - R68's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R68 had a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections) R68's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R68 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident required substantial to maximal staff assistance with toileting and personal hygiene. The Urinary Incontinence Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 151 residents. The sample included 31 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide Resident (R) 68, R347, and R75 or their representative with written information regarding the facility bed hold policy when they were transferred to the hospital. This placed the residents at risk of not being permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. Findings included: - R68's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R68 had a diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH-non-cancerous enlargement of the prostate which can lead to interference with urine flow, urinary frequency, and urinary tract infections) R68's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R68 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident required substantial to maximal staff assistance with toileting and personal hygiene. The Urinary Incontinence Care Area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-27 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 151 residents. The sample included 31 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Residents (R) 87, R68, and R110 received a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) to identify potential care needs related to a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID). This placed the residents at risk for unidentified needs and inadequate care. Findings included: - R87's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), asthma (a disorder of narrowed airways that caused wheezing and shortness of breath), and bipolar disorder (a major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 151 residents. The sample included 31 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan with trauma triggers and coping strategies for Resident (R)50 who had post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress) which placed the resident at risk for impaired care due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - Resident (R) 50's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), cerebral infarction (stroke - the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), aphasia (a language disorder that affects ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 151 residents. The sample included 31 residents, of which one was reviewed for mobility and positioning. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 53 received appropriate treatment and services to maintain and prevent a decline in mobility and ambulation. This placed the resident at risk for a decline in mobility and impaired independence. Findings included: - R53's Electronic Health Record (EHR), recorded the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin), osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing). R53's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R70's Electronic Medical Record, (EMR) documented the resident had a diagnosis of hyperkalemia (greater than normal amount of potassium in the blood). R70's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS documented R70 required staff supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs). R70's Medication Care Plan, revised 10/02/22, instructed staff to administer her medications as the physician ordered. R70's EMR documented her potassium level was out of normal range (3.5-5.1millimoles per liter (mmol/L) of blood) on the following dates: 04/22/22-6.2 mmol/L 05/31/22-5.4 mmol/L The Physician Order, dated 06/09/2022, instructed staff to administer to R70 Lokelma (medication used to treat high levels of potassium in the blood) 5 gram (g) packet, daily. The Nurse's Note, dated 09/19/2022 at 01:50 PM, documented R70 did not receive the physician ordered Lokelma, 5g daily, for the last two days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 118 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with one reviewed for smoking. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for smoking for Resident (R) 72. This placed the resident at risk for smoking related injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R72 documented diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), diabetes mellites type 2 (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and emptiness), bipolar disorder (major mental illness that caused people to have episodes of severe high and low moods), and hypertension (high blood pressure). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R72 had moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 118 residents. The sample included 25 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to update the care plan with interventions for Resident (R) 51, and R111's falls, and R35 for behaviors. This practice placed the residents at risk for injury from falls and unmet care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R51 documented diagnoses of astrocytoma (brain cancer), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), and hypokalemia (deficiency of potassium in the bloodstream). The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R51 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, toileting, and extensive assistance of one for bed mobility, personal hygiene, and locomotion on and off the unit. The assessment further documented R51 had unsteady balance, no upper or lower functional impairment, and had no falls. The Quarterly MDS, dated 09/11/22, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 118 residents. The sample included 25 residents with one reviewed for positioning. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper positioning and utilize a neck pillow or collar as care planned for sampled Resident (R) 101. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for further decrease in range of motion. Findings included: - R101's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (type of dementia that affects memory, thinking and behavior). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R101 had severe cognitive impairment, impaired range of motion (ROM) in all extremities, and required extensive staff assistance with eating, dressing, bed mobility and total staff assistance with transfers, locomotion, toileting, and hygiene. The Skin Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/26/22, documented R101 was at risk of skin breakdown due to decreased mobility and incontinence. The Skin Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 118 residents. The sample included 25 residents, with seven reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to indentify and /or implement resident centered interventions to prevent falls for Resident (R) 51, and R111. This placed the residents at risk for further falls and injury. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R51 documented diagnoses of astrocytoma (brain cancer), epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures), and hypokalemia (deficiency of potassium in the bloodstream). The admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R51 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers, toileting, and extensive assistance of one for bed mobility, personal hygiene, and locomotion on and off the unit. The assessment further documented R51 had unsteady balance, no upper or lower functional impairment, and had no falls. The Quarterly MDS, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-24 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 118 residents. The sample included 25 residents with one reviewed for medically related social service needs. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide routine social services visits as care planned for Resident (R) 13. This deficient practice placed her at risk for further behavior and potential for rehospitalization. Findings included: - Resident (R) 13's Electronic Medical Record included diagnoses of stroke, hemiparesis (paralysis of one side of the body), diabetes mellitus (an impairment in the way the body regulates and uses sugar (glucose), chronic pain, bipolar disorder (mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood, energy), post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), and anxiety disorder (mental health disorder characterized by feelings of worry, anxiety, or fear that are strong enough to interfere with one's daily activities). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DELMAR GARDENS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.8+1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DELMAR GARDENS ENTERPRISES INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/11/2003
GABE GROSSBERG AND GEORGE GROSSBERG, TRUSTEES OF THE HENRY AND BARBARAOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 03/11/2003
GEORGE GROSSBERG AND GABE GROSSBERG, TRUSTEES OF THE HENRY AND BARBARAOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 03/11/2003
GOLDBERG-NOM LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 03/11/2003
NON-GST FAMILY TRUST EST U/W OF ISRAEL GOLDBERG FBO JANICE BITANSKIOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 04/10/2013
NON-GST FAMILY TRUST ESTABLISHED U/W OF ISRAEL GOLDBERG FBO HARRY ZVIOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 04/10/2013
NON-GSTFAMILY TRUST EST U/W ISRAEL GOLDBERG FBO DIANE FREDMANOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 04/10/2013
GROSSBERG, GABEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER16%since 03/11/2003
GROSSBERG, GEORGEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 03/11/2003
ALLEN, KATHRYNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/04/2013
RODGERS, LYNNIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/05/2020
MARX, KENNETHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/11/2019
OPPENHEIMER, HOWARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/11/2003
DELMAR GARDENS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2005

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 5%Other / private 34%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$293per resident / day
operating cost
$8,914per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$286per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175122. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next