No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Delmar Gardens Of Chesterfield

14855 North Outer 40 Road, Chesterfield, MO 63017 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 227 certified beds · (636) 532-0150 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (636) 532-0150 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Aug 2025Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Aug 2025
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
16020 Swingley Ridge Rd Ste 220 · (314) 652-2047 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
917 Chesterfield Pkwy E · (636) 532-5222 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Schnucks0.3 mi
141 Hilltown Village Ctr · (636) 532-8814 · Call to confirm hours
Place of worship
16052 Swingley Ridge Rd · (314) 420-7338

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.8%18.1%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.8%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%18.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.9%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.3%17.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.9%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.5%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.9%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.2%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.2%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.2%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.3%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.372.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.062.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 196 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.2%CMS range 40.4–56.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.4%CMS range 10.5–16.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge27.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting94.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.8%CMS range 6.8–14.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.24
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.81
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.77
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.12
RN hoursweekends
48.8%
Total nursing turnover
64.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 227 beds and averages 173.4 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.81 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-06)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

39 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 25 opportunities, two errors occurred, resulting in an 8% medication error rate (Residents #45, and #145). The census was 171 with 166 with certified bed.Review of the facility's Medication Administration-General Guidelines Policy, revised 1/2021, showed: Policy: Only a Registered Nurse (RN), License Practical Nurse (LPN), Certified Medication Aide, or Certified Medication Technician (CMT) are assigned responsibility for preparing, administering and/or record the administration of medications. Medications must be administered in accordance with a physician's order (i.e., the right resident, the right medication, the right dosage, the right route and the right time). Review of the facility's Administration Insulin policy, dated 5/2021, showed:-Remove the pen cap and cleanse the rubber stopper with an alcohol wipe. Attach pen to needle to device;-Prime the pen immediately before…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labels on medications. For three out of four certified medical technician (CMT) carts checked and one of four medication storage rooms checked. The census was 171 with 166 with certified bed. Review of the facility's Medication Storage Policy, dated December 2021, showed:-Drugs and medications are to be stored in the original container in which they were received;-Only the charge nurse or medication nurse has access to the narcotics keys;-No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or medications are stored in the facility over the thirty (30) days;-Medications which require refrigeration are kept in the refrigerator in the locked medication room. Drugs stored under the refrigeration are stored separately from food;-Compartments and areas containing drugs are locked when not in use or when left unattended. Such area included drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts and boxes. 1. Observation of the 100-hall medication CMT cart on 8/4/25 at 7:15 A.M., showed a small white…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one discharged resident's (Resident #131) Oxycodone (narcotic used to treat pain) and one resident's (Resident #185) discontinued Ativan (used to treat anxiety) were appropriately destroyed in accordance with the facility's policy and free from medication misappropriation. The facility started the investigation when the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) questionably destroyed a resident's discontinued Hydrocodone (Resident #113). The ADON admitted to taking the discontinued medications of Resident #131 and Resident #185 for personal use. She provided the card of Oxycodone and the bottle of Ativan at the time of questioning. The census was 177 with 166 in certified beds. The Administrator was notified on 8/6/25, of the past non-compliance. Upon notification of the misappropriation allegation on 6/25/25, the facility immediately suspended staff, investigated and implemented abuse/neglect in-servicing to all facility staff. The training also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff maintained safe resident transfer techniques during a Hoyer (used for persons who are non-weight bearing) lift (Resident #12) and during a gait belt transfer (Resident #157). The sample was 33. The census was 177 with 166 in certified beds.Review of the transfer and lift policy, reviewed 5/2021, showed:-Purpose: to provide communication to staff regarding the resident's transfer abilities and to assure all precautions are taken to maintain safety of the resident. -Policy: -Upon admission each resident will be assessed by the inter-disciplinary team on the capabilities of how the resident transfers. This will be re-assessed with changes in condition; -A butterfly magnet will be placed inside the resident room on the overhead light or the door frame of the room indicating how the resident transfers. The butterfly will be coded to inform the staff of the resident's transfer ability; -The resident's transfer ability will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #6) received gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a tube surgically inserted into the abdomen used for liquid nutrition, fluids and medications) feedings at the specified times as ordered by the physician and to ensure the resident's head of bed (HOB) was elevated to prevent aspiration (choking). The sample was 33. The census was 171 with 166 in certified beds.Review of the facility's Tube Feeding policy, revised June, 2021, showed:-Purpose: to deliver a continuous, regulated drip feeding to gastrostomy tube-fed residents using an enteral (delivering nutrition and medications through the gastrointestinal system) pump;-Procedure: -Equipment: Enteral pump, enteral feeding bag and administration set, prescribed feeding, and a pole; -Review the physician's orders; The order should specify the amount and type of formula, and the flow rate. Review of the facility's Following Physician Orders policy, dated 6/29/21, showed:-Purpose: It is the policy of the community to ensure that all licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented actions taken to address irregularities noted by the pharmacist for one of three residents sampled for medication regimen reviews (Resident #7). The sample was 33. The census was 171 with 166 in certified beds.Review of the facility's Pharmacist Consultant Duties and Responsibilities policy, reviewed May 2021, showed:-Purpose: To ensure that drug regimen reviews, medication pass observations, and medication audits are performed in accordance with state and federal regulations;-Drug regimen review (DRR):-Policy: The consultant pharmacist reviews the medications for each resident for any irregularities and to: verify appropriateness of the medications involved; evaluate disease state management; ensure appropriate medication monitoring to maximize safety and efficacy; and prioritize patient goals, safety, and quality of life;-Procedures: --The consultant pharmacist reviews each resident chart to identify and address any irregularities;--The consultant pharmacist will review the chart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, staff failed to following policies and procedures regarding hand hygiene and enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) prior to applying protective personal equipment (PPE) and touching the resident (Resident #12). The sample was 33. The census was 177 with 166 in certified beds.Review of the enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) policy, revised 8/2024, showed:-Purpose: to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO, various bacteria that are resistant to various antibiotic therapies);-Definitions: -EBPs are indicated for residents with any of the following: -Infection or colonization with a MDRO when contact precautions do not apply; -Wounds even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO;-Procedure: -Residents with colonization of MDRO and/or with indwelling medical devices (intravenous lines) will be placed on EBP; -Signage placed outside the room to alert staff that personal protective equipment (PPE) including gowns and gloves,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary was completed, including a recapitulation of the resident's stay and final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge (Resident #7). The sample was 14. The census was 168. Review of the discharge or transfer policy, dated January 2021, showed: -Purpose: -To provide prompt and safe discharge/transfer of a resident from the facility and to ensure continuity of care through provisions of pertinent resident information; -To provide orientation for a resident being discharged /transferred to ensure a safe and orderly transition home or to a new living environment; -Procedure: -A discharge summary observation will be completed for all residents who: -Discharge to a private residence/home or independent retirement community; -Transferred to another facility; -The nurse will obtain an order from the physician for transfer/discharge or a resident as well as release of medications; -discharged to residence/home or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to provide the necessary care to prevent pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) for one resident who was at high risk for pressure ulcers and developed a new pressure ulcer (Resident #10) and for a resident who was at risk for pressure ulcers and had an existing pressure ulcer (Resident #11). The sample size was three. The census was 168. Review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument User's Manual, Version 3.0, Chapter 3, Section M, defines the different stages of pressure as follows: -Stage I: an observable, pressure related alteration of intact skin, whose indicators as compared to an adjacent or opposite area on the body may include changes in skin temperature, tissue consistency, sensation, and/or a defined area of persistent redness; -Stage II:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-15 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the Administrator's Job Description, the facility failed to ensure good faith attempts were made to correct quality deficiencies through their Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process. The Administration had not implemented any QAPI programs to address the ongoing COVID-19 and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) outbreaks. Additionally, the administration failed to identify sufficient staffing as a possible quality deficiency. These failures placed all facility residents at risk for transmission of COVID-19 and RSV and accidents, unmet needs, and lack of incontinence care related to insufficient staffing. Findings include: Review of the undated Job Description - Administrator revealed, Assist with all aspects of Quality Assurance . [and] Ensure that each resident receives the necessary nursing, medical, and psychosocial services to attain and maintain the highest possible mental and physical functional status possible. Throughout the survey, the following deficient practices were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, and facility policy review, the facility failed to: 1. Wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to residents on transmission-based precautions. 2. Doff (take off) soiled PPE prior to exiting the resident's room. 3. Complete resident testing upon new positive cases of COVID-19 in the building. 4. Complete contact tracing for staff that were in close contact with COVID-19 positive residents or exposed to Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) positive residents 5. Provide evidence of staff testing done during an outbreak of COVID-19. 6. Ensure appropriate cohorting of residents within close contact to other COVID-19 and RSV positive residents. This affected 49 (Residents (R) 116, R46, R121, R65, R81, R72, R13, R157, R14, R96, R67, R172, R88, R92, R134, R221, R111, R173, R156, R174, R83, R130, R175, R158, R114, R176, R4, R177, R159, R131, R273, R272, R178, R28, R179, R108, R102,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure third party liability (TPL) forms were completed within 30 days for the final accounting for residents who expired. This affected 15 residents who expired and had money in their accounts (Residents #509, #505, #502, #503, #511, #504, #501, #508, #510, #506, #512, #517, #513, #516, #515). The sample size was 17. The census was 179. 1. Review of Resident #509's medical record showed the following: -Effective/Expired on [DATE]; -Ending balance of $927.44; -No documentation of a TPL. 2. Review of Resident #505's medical record showed the following: -Effective/Expired on [DATE]; -Ending balance of $150.07; -TPL completed on [DATE]. 3. Review of Resident #502's medical record showed the following: -Effective/Expired on [DATE]; -Ending balance of $4238.47; -TPL completed on [DATE]. 4. Review of Resident #503's medical record showed the following: -Effective/Expired on [DATE]; -Ending balance of $3768.40; -TPL completed on [DATE]. 5. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record reviews, and review of monthly Resident Council meeting minutes, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needs of the 180 residents in the facility. Several residents and staff members voiced concerns regarding sufficient staffing, and the facility exhibited failures related to a lack of sufficient staffing throughout the survey. Findings include: A policy on staffing was requested but was not provided prior to survey exit. Review of the monthly Resident Council meeting minutes, provided on paper, revealed concerns of call lights taking too long to be answered were brought up in January 2024, November 2023, October 2023, and June 2023. During Initial Pool interviews and observations, four residents voiced concerns related to a lack of sufficient staffing: -During an interview with a resident who wished to remain anonymous on 02/05/24 at 11:28 A.M., the resident stated there was not enough staff available to answer call lights, especially at night. -During an interview on 02/05/24 at 11:57 A.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, review of Resident Council Meeting notes, and policy review, the facility failed to serve hot foods at palatable temperatures for seven of 40 sampled residents (Resident (R) 6, R64, R57, R75, R123, R143, and R146). This failure had the potential to contribute to decreased intake by residents. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Enhancing the Dining Experience, from the Dining Services policy and procedures manual, dated 2014, number 11 of 12 listed tasks stated that the meals were to be served in an attractive manner; served at the appropriate temperature; served according to safe food handling practices, and meets the residents' individualized needs. Review of the Resident Council Meeting notes, provided by the facility, revealed two previous food temperature group complaints were recorded on 07/24/23 and 11/27/23. During observation of the lunch meal service on 02/06/24 at 12:30 P.M., R64 was served lunch and ate less than 25 percent of his/her meal. R64 stated his/her food did not look appetizing or taste good. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the advance health care directive of one (Resident (R) 147) of six residents reviewed for advance directives was honored. This failure had the potential to result in unwanted provision of cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) resulting in possible pain, injuries such as broken ribs, and altered mental status. Findings include: Review of the undated Advance Directives Policy revealed, Upon admission, identify if the resident has an advance directive and if not, determine if the resident wishes to formulate an advance directive . Resident wishes will be communicated to the staff via the care plan and (identify facility protocol for communication of advance directives either in written or oral format) and to the resident physician. Review of R147's Resident Face Sheet under the Resident tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment including assessment of mood and daily activity preference for two (Resident (R) 100 and R147) of 40 sample residents. These failures created a potential for specific resident needs related to mood and/or daily and activity preference to go unidentified. Findings include: Review of the CMS Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, accessed at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/finalmds-30-rai-manual-v11811october2023.pdf, revealed, Mood: Intent: The items in this section address mood distress and social isolation. Mood distress is a serious condition that is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the nursing home and is associated with significant morbidity. It is particularly important to identify signs and symptoms of mood distress among nursing home…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to conduct a quarterly assessment including assessment of cognitive patterns and mood for one (Resident (R) 118) of 40 sampled residents. These failures created a potential for specific resident needs related to cognition and mood to go unidentified. Findings include: Review of the CMS Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, accessed at https://www.cms.gov/files/document/finalmds-30-rai-manual-v11811october2023.pdf, revealed, Cognitive Patterns: Intent: The items in this section are intended to determine the resident's attention, orientation, and ability to register and recall new information and whether the resident has signs and symptoms of delirium. These items are crucial factors in many care-planning decisions . Attempt to conduct the interview with ALL residents. This interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Level 1 pre-screening of a resident for a mental disorder (MD) or intellectual disability (ID) prior to admission to the facility was completed for one of one resident (Resident (R) 23) reviewed for Level 1 (one) Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Findings include: Review of R23's ''Face Sheet'' located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the ''Profile'' tab, revealed an admission date of 12/15/17 and included the following diagnoses: anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of R23's annual ''Minimum Data Set (MDS),'' located in the EMR under the ''MDS'' tab, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/06/23 revealed R23 had a ''Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)'' score of eight out of 15, which indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS indicated R23 had anxiety disorder and manic depression. Review of R23's EMR did not include a Level 1 PASARR.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two (Resident (R) 100 and R147) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) received assistance with incontinence care and/or using the toilet as needed. These failures created a potential for skin problems, urinary tract infections, or increased incontinence for these two residents. Findings include: Review of the Urinary Incontinence Management policy, dated June 2021, revealed, AII residents will receive perineal care, as needed, in the morning before breakfast. every evening with evening care at bedtime, as needed after bowel movement or urination, and each time the resident is incontinent. The policy failed to address the expectation for rounding to check for incontinence and change if needed at least every two hours. 1. Review of R100's Resident Face Sheet under the Resident tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (Resident (R) 147 and R151) of five residents reviewed for activities were assessed for activity interests and needs and received a program of activities to meet their needs. These failures placed R147 and R151 at risk for increased feelings of depression, helplessness, and boredom. Findings include: A policy on provision of activities was requested from the facility; however, was not provided prior to survey exit. 1. Review of R147's Resident Face Sheet under the Resident tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease with anxiety, depression, and repeated falls. Review of R147's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/13/23 and located in the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) tab of the EMR, revealed he/she was unable to answer the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician acted upon the notification of irregularities in the medication regimen for one (Resident (R) 53) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure created the potential for unnecessary antipsychotic medication use, which could lead to adverse consequences such as over-sedation, mental status changes, or involuntary movements. Findings include: Review of the Behaviors Using Person -Centered Care, Accommodating policy, dated February 2021, revealed, Psychopharmacological therapy Charting requirements [for] Antipsychotics and/or any psychotherapeutic agents (other than antipsychotics, sedative/hypnotics: Targeted harmful behaviors must be defined and the occurrence of such documented quantitatively every shift on flow sheet. A policy addressing the Pharmacist's drug regimen review and physician response was requested but not provided prior to survey exit. Review of R53's Resident Face Sheet under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the drug regimen of one (Resident (R) 53) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications contained adequate indication for use of an anti-psychotic medication. This failure placed R53 for potentially avoidable adverse effects of the drug, including over-sedation, mental status changes, or involuntary movements. Findings include: Review of the Behaviors Using Person -Centered Care, Accommodating policy, dated February 2021, revealed, Criteria for identifying a problem behavior: A danger or safety risk to self/others . The potential risks of Antipsychotic Drugs are: Movement disorders, e.g., tardive dyskinesia, EPS symptoms; Hypotension; Sedation; Weight gain; Blurred vision; Dry mouth; Constipation; Urinary retention; Tachycardia; Increase risk for falling and fractures; Stroke; [and] Associated hospitalizations/death . Inappropriate use for antipsychotic medications: Wandering; Poor self-care; Restlessness; Impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, the facility failed to ensure dishware stored at the ice machine was covered or inverted for storage in a clean, dry location not exposed to dust or other potential contamination. Findings include: Review of the 2022 US FDA Food Code under Storing: Equipment, Utensils, Linens, and Single-Service and Single-Use Articles revealed cleaned equipment and utensils shall be stored in a clean, dry location; where they are not exposed to splash, dust, or other contaminants; and shall be stored covered or inverted. During an interview with Resident (R) 103's family member (F3) on 02/06/24 at 12:21 P.M., he/she stated his/her family member did not like to drink from the hydration mugs, because he/she did not think they were clean. F3 stated he/she brought R103 drinks from home. During on observation on 02/09/24 at 2:05 P.M. of the room containing the facility ice machine and the employee time clock, revealed a large plastic shelving unit in the corner of the room. The shelving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident's room (room [ROOM NUMBER]-1) was clean and in good repair for one room observed on the 200 Hall. Findings include: Review of the Environmental Cleaning and Infection Control Policy effective date March 2020 under Housekeeping Resident Room, under Procedures item 5 revealed Staff should promote a homelike living environment for all residents. Under Bathroom Cleaning Clean the toilet with disinfectant (including the tank, outside and inside the bowl) .Clean the sink, tub/shower, including all tile inside and around the shower walls and floor . During an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 on 02/08/24 at 10:15 A.M., the resident who resided in the room said his/her room, bathroom, and shower had not been cleaned for several weeks. In addition, the resident complained that the floor in her room and bathroom had a sticky film. During an observation on 02/09/24 at 10:20 A.M., the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER]-1 and in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with dignity and respect by failing to administer insulin injections in a private area for three residents (Residents #341, #340 and #342) and by failing to sit next to one resident while assisting the resident with a meal (Resident #77). The sample was 24. The census was 155 with 137 residents in certified beds. 1. Review of Resident #341's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/30/20, showed: -admission date of 12/30/15; -Severe cognitive impairment; -Diagnoses included diabetes, dementia, Alzheimer's disease and depression; -Insulin injections received 7 of 7 days. Review of the resident's November 2021 medication administration record (MAR), showed: -An order, dated 12/10/20, for insulin aspart (short acting insulin) insulin pen; 100 units per milliliter (ml); administer 30 units subcutaneous (under the skin) three times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-22 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their transfer or discharge policy by not providing to the resident and/or their representative the written transfer notice at the time of the resident's facility initiated transfer, for 4 residents (Residents #84, #72 #135, and #71). The sample was 24. The census was 155 with 137 in certified beds. Review of the facility's Hospital Transfer of Resident policy, revised January 2019, showed: -Purpose: To provide prompt and safe transfer of resident from the facility and to ensure continuity of care through provision of pertinent resident information; -Procedure: An interact nursing home to hospital transfer form (tool used to help the nursing home clearly communicate a wide range of critical information about the resident to emergency room) observations will be completed by the nurse unless it is an urgent 911 and/or time doesn't allow; -Notify resident representative and document that their intent to have resident transferred to the hospital;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-22 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or resident representative of the bed hold requirements at the time of transfer to the hospital for various medical reasons for four of the 24 residents sampled (Resident #84, #72, #135, and #71). The census was 155 with 137 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's Bed Hold Policy, undated, showed: -Purpose: To notify the resident and/or representative(s) of the Bed Hold Policy in writing at the time of admission, upon change or revision and when transferred to a hospital or during therapeutic leave, as well as the intent for readmission according to state and federal regulations; -Procedure: The facility will also give a copy of this policy to the resident and/or representative if transferred to a hospital. In addition, the facility will call the representative, if applicable, within 24 hours of the transfer or leave. 1. Review of Resident #84's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-22 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment of residents at least annually for nine residents (Residents #20, #5, #339, #284, #338, #136, #28, #335 and #334). The sample was 24. The census was 155 with 137 in certified beds. 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record, showed admitted on [DATE]. Review of the residents Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally required assessment instrument completed by facility staff) record, showed: -An annual assessment dated [DATE]; -A quarterly assessment dated [DATE]; -No annual assessment completed [DATE]. 2. Review of Resident #5's medical record, showed admitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's MDS record, showed: -An annual assessment dated [DATE]; -No comprehensive assessment completed [DATE]. 3. Review of Resident #339's medical record, showed admitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's MDS record, showed: -A change in condition assessment dated [DATE]; -No comprehensive assessment completed [DATE]. 4. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-22 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument not less frequently than once every 3 months for six residents (Residents #20, #41, #8, #284, #335 and #334). The sample was 24. The census was 155 with 137 in certified beds. 1. Review of Resident #20's medical record, showed admitted on [DATE]. Review of the residents Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally required assessment instrument completed by facility staff) record, showed: -An annual assessment dated [DATE]; -A quarterly assessment dated [DATE]; -No quarterly assessment completed [DATE]. 2. Review of Resident #41's medical record, showed admitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's MDS record, showed: -An admission assessment dated [DATE]; -No quarterly assessment completed [DATE]. 3. Review of Resident #8's medical record, showed admitted on [DATE]. Review of the resident's MDS record, showed: -An admission assessment dated [DATE]; -No quarterly assessment completed [DATE]. 4. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had complete, accurate and individualized care plans, to address the specific needs of the residents, for five of 24 sampled residents (Residents #61, #71, #135, #11 and #84). The census was 155 with 137 residents in certified beds. 1. Review of Resident #61's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff), dated 10/15/21, showed: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -No behaviors; -Required the assistance of one staff for walking, transfers, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene; -Always continent of bowel and bladder; -Diagnoses included high blood pressure, diabetes, dementia and depression. Review of the resident's November 2021 electronic physician order sheet (ePOS), showed: -An order, dated 10/20/21, for palliative care (specialized medical care for people living with a serious illness); -An order, dated 11/6/21, for female certified nurse aides (CNA) only for all shifts.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess two residents for medication self-administration and obtain physician's orders (Resident #384 and #492), obtain physician's orders for a wanderguard (a device worn by a resident that triggers alarms and can lock monitored doors to prevent the resident leaving unattended) for one resident (Resident #61) and obtain oxygen orders for one resident utilizing oxygen (Resident #33). Facility staff also failed to provide showers as ordered for one resident (Resident #1), provide treatments as ordered for two residents (Resident #203 and #53) and perform weekly skin assessments for one resident (Resident #53). The sample was 24. The census was 155 with 137 residents in certified beds. 1. Review of the medication administration policy, dated January 2021, showed residents are allowed to self-administer medication specifically ordered by the attending physician. 2. Review of the facility's self-administration policy, dated 6/21, showed: -Self…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were knowledgeable about hazardous chemical protocol with utilization of safety data sheets (SDS) when one resident (Resident #339) ingested alcohol-based hand sanitizer. The facility staff failed to lock the medication/treatment cart when not in direct sight of the staff, failed to complete a smoking assessment for one resident (Resident #284) and failed to complete fall follow up for four residents (Residents #61, #490, #487 and #5). The sample was 24. The census was 155 with 137 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's Emergency Safety Procedures for Hazardous Chemicals policy, effective November 2021, showed: -Purpose: Manage potential or actual exposure to hazardous material. Provide directives regarding the best way to respond quickly and appropriately. First aide procedures include inhalation, ingestion, skin, and eye; -Procedure: -Ensure the resident is safe and free of harm; -Notify the charge nurse;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-11-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality of the labs obtained when they failed to meet the applicable requirements for obtaining their own labs. The facility failed to ensure accurate results of the blood glucose test machines by not completing daily quality control checks and then used expired control check solution. The census was 155 with 137 in certified beds. Observation of the 700 hall treatment cart on [DATE] at 1:45 P.M., showed two boxes of control solution (solution used to test the accuracy of the blood glucose machine). The two boxes showed expiration dates of [DATE] and [DATE]. Each box had two bottles of control solution, one bottle of normal solution and one bottle of high control solution, used to test the accuracy of the glucometer. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:45 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) LL said he/she wasn't sure which control solution was used because the night shift does that. LPN LL then took the two expired boxes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff would follow the resident's wishes to request or refuse lifesaving treatments in the event the resident was found with no signs of life, by failing to ensure the resident's code status was consistently documented in the medical record, for two residents (Residents #134 and #136). In addition, the facility failed to have a written policy to implement advanced directives. The sample was 24. The census was 155 with 137 in certified beds. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:20 A.M., the administrator said the facility does not have an advance directive policy. 1. Review of Resident #134's electronic medical record, showed: -An electronic face sheet with an admission date of [DATE]; -A physician order dated [DATE], for cardio pulmonary resuscitation (CPR, lifesaving measures are to be performed); -No documentation the resident's wishes for code status were discussed with the resident or resident's representative and/or if the resident's wishes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-22 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notices (SNF ABN) for two of two residents sampled as part of the Beneficiary Notice review who remained in the facility after being discharged from skilled services (Residents #7 and #43). The census was 155 with 137 residents in certified beds. 1. Review of the list of residents discharged from skilled services within the last six months, provided by the facility, showed Resident #7 discharged from skilled services on 7/5/21, and remained in the facility. Review of the notices provided to the resident, showed no SNF ABN notice provided. 2. Review of the list of residents discharged from skilled services within the last six months, provided by the facility, showed Resident #43 discharged from skilled services on 10/9/21, and remained in the facility. Review of the notices provided to the resident, showed no SNF ABN notice provided. 3. During an interview on 11/17/21 at 5:15 A.M., the administrator said the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their grievance policy by not ensuring a prompt resolution to a grievance regarding a missing tablet computer for one resident (Resident #338). The sample was 24. The census was 155 with 137 residents in certified beds. Review of the facility's Grievance Procedure, reviewed June 2021, showed: -Purpose: Residents and resident representative(s) are always encouraged to visit with administration any time they have input or concerns. In the majority of instances, the concern will be resolved. For those wishing to file a grievance, the following procedure would apply; -Procedure: -Any resident or resident's representative who wishes to file a grievance in regards to care and treatment which has been furnished (or not furnished), conditions, or violations of rights while under the care of the facility or any other concern is welcome to submit a written account of the details of the grievance to the administrator without fear of discrimination or reprisal. In the event the resident is unable to do so in writing, he/she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing practice when staff failed to provide treatments as ordered by the physician for one resident who had a Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible but the bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed) Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining or tunneling) (Resident #336) and failed to routinely assess one resident who was at risk for developing pressure ulcers (Resident #84). The sample was 24. The census was 155 with 137 in certified beds. Review of the facility's Wound Care Protocol, revised 8/2018, showed: -Goals of assessment: Provide uniform description, facilitate communication among staff, adequate monitoring of progress or deterioration; -How to assess/document: Initially assess the ulcer(s) for location, stage, size, sinus tracts, undermining, tunneling, exudate, necrotic tissue, the presence or absence of granulation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-11-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from any significant medication errors, for one resident (Resident #28) who was administered two different insulins more than two hours after they were ordered to be administered. The census was 155 with 137 in certified beds. Review of the facility's medication administration policy, revised January 2021, showed: -Medications are to be given at the time ordered, within sixty minutes before or after designated time, or according to liberalized medication pass time. Review of Resident #28's electronic Physician Order Sheet (ePOS) showed: -An order dated 9/28/20, for Lantus-Solostar U-100 (long-acting insulin), 28 units twice a day, 7:30 A.M. and 4:30 P.M.; -An order dated 7/6/21, for Humalog Kwikpen Insulin (insulin lispro, short acting insulin), 14 units twice a day, morning med pass 7:30 A.M., and noon pass 11:30 A.M.; -An order dated 8/2/21, to check the resident's blood sugar before meals (AC) and at bedtime (HS) with times listed: 7:30 A.M., 11:30 A.M., 4:30 P.M., and 8:00 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and to help prevent the transmission of infection, when staff failed to clean glucometer machines (used to check blood sugar levels) before and/or after use and failed to clean the injection site prior to administering an insulin injection for two residents (Residents #134, and #75). The sample was 24. The census was 155 with 137 in certified beds. 1. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated January 2021, showed: -Wash your hands before and after each resident contact. An alcohol based wash may be substituted; -The policy did not address injectable medication such as insulin. Review of #134's medical record, showed: -Diagnoses included concussion, diabetes and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a tube/catheter inserted into a vein for medication administration). -A care plan revised, 11/18/21, showed: -Problem: Resident admitted with a PICC line to left upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to DELMAR GARDENS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DELMAR GARDENS ENTERPRISES INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 02/18/2005
GABE GROSSBERG AND GEORGE GROSSBERG, TRUSTEES OF THE HENRY AND BARBARAOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 02/18/2005
GEORGE GROSSBERG AND GABE GROSSBERG, TRUSTEES OF THE HENRY AND BARBARAOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST8%since 02/18/2005
GOLDBERG-NOM LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 02/18/2005
NON-GST FAMILY TRUST EST U/W OF ISRAEL GOLDBERG FBO JANICE BITANSKIOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 04/10/2013
NON-GST FAMILY TRUST ESTABLISHED U/W OF ISRAEL GOLDBERG FBO HARRY ZVIOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 04/10/2013
NON-GSTFAMILY TRUST EST U/W ISRAEL GOLDBERG FBO DIANE FREDMANOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST6%since 04/10/2013
GROSSBERG, GABEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER16%since 02/18/2005
GROSSBERG, GEORGEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST11%since 02/18/2005
MARX, KENNETHIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 05/01/2022
NALLABELLI, KAVITHAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/29/2019
OPPENHEIMER, HOWARDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/18/2005
DELMAR GARDENS MANAGEMENT SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2005

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 6%Other / private 26%

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$313per resident / day
operating cost
$9,517per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$314per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265170. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next