NHC Healthcare, Glasgow

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 158 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 98 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 194 beds and averages 151.3 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment inside the facility for its residents. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, NHC Healthcare Glasgow Environment Policy, dated March 2026, revealed the facility strived to maintain a comfortable, safe environment in the facility. Per review, all partners (staff) worked together to identify maintenance issues that needed to be addressed. Further review revealed maintenance partners had the responsibility to ensure . all areas are free of safety hazards. 1. Observation on 03/06/2026 at 2:41 PM, of the hallway to the right of the reception desk, revealed metal wall anchors which had been left exposed, protruding out of the wall approximately two inches at a height of approximately 33 inches off the floor. Continued observation revealed the metal anchors had been left exposed when the handrails were removed to paint the walls. Further observation revealed there were four metal anchors on the right side of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, pharmacy audit reports, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain medical records for each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 5 of 35 sampled residents, (Residents (Rs)4, R22, R30, R70, R102). The findings include: Review of the facility's, Network Pharmacy Policy, titled, Preparation and General Guidelines - Medication Administration - General Guidelines, revised 01/01/2019, revealed the individual who administered a medication dose was to record the administration on the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) directly after the medication was given. Further review revealed at the end of each medication pass, the person who administered the medications was to review the MAR to ensure necessary doses were administered and documented. Review of the facility's Network Pharmacy Policy, titled, Preparation and General Guidelines - Controlled Substances, revised 02/25/2025, revealed accurate accountability of all controlled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity and provided care in a manner and in an environment that promoted maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life for one of 31 sampled residents, (Resident (R)14). The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Patient Rights Booklet (Section J), revised 09/2024, revealed the facility was to provide residents with privacy to maintain a dignified existence. Per policy review, privacy was to be maintained during toileting, bathing, and other activities of personal hygiene. Record review revealed the facility admitted R14 on 11/11/2022, with diagnoses to include atherosclerotic heart disease, lymphedema, anxiety disorder, and history of other venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/19/2025, revealed the facility assessed R14 to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to comply with the requirements to inform and provide written information to all residents concerning the right to, at the resident's option, formulate an advance directive for 1 of 31 sampled residents (Resident (R)113). The findings include: Review of the facility policy Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Order, revised March 2012, showed the interdisciplinary care planning team was to review advance directives with residents during quarterly care planning sessions to see if any changes were desired. Review of R113's Face Sheet showed admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis post-cerebral infarction on the left non-dominant side. The 01/20/2026 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment noted a BIMS score of 15/15, indicating intact cognition. The last quarterly care conference on 02/09/2026 showed no documentation that advance directives were discussed. In an interview on 03/05/2026 at 9:00 AM, the Social…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's investigation reports and policies, the facility failed to implement a written policy to ensure abuse allegations were reported as required to the State Survey Agency (SSA) per Federal and State Law for 1 of 31 sampled residents, (Resident (R)22).The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Patient Protection and Response Policy for Allegations/Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Exploitation, revised 02/01/2023, revealed any patient (resident) event reported was to be considered an allegation of either abuse, neglect, misappropriation of patient (resident) property or exploitation. Per review, the facility was to ensure all alleged violations .were reported immediately, . or not later than 24 hours (if the events that caused the allegation did not involve abuse and did not result in serious bodily injury) to the Administrator of the facility. Further review revealed all alleged violations were to be reported to other officials (including the State Survey Agency (SSA) in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report suspected misappropriation of resident property to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within 24 hours for 1 of 31 sampled residents, (Resident (R)22). The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Patient Protection and Response Policy for Allegations/Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Exploitation, revised 02/01/2023, revealed any (resident) event reported to (staff) by patient (resident) was to be considered an allegation of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of (resident) property or exploitation. Per policy review, the allegation was to be considered misappropriation if it met the following criteria: .the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a patient's (resident's) belongings or money without the patient's (resident's) consent. Continued review revealed the facility was to ensure all alleged violations involving . misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, .…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, facility policy and document review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation of narcotic medications for 1 of 31 sampled residents, (Resident (R)22). The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Patient Protection and Response Policy for Allegations/Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Exploitation, revised 02/01/2023, revealed the patient (resident) had the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of property, and exploitation. Further policy review revealed all events reported as possible (resident) abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of patient (resident) property was to be investigated and when there was a question as to whether to conduct an investigation, it was best to do so. Review of R22's Facesheet revealed the facility admitted the resident on 07/14/2024, with diagnoses of right femur head fracture, anxiety disorder, and dementia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/26/2025, revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 31 sampled residents, (Resident (R)3 and R22). The findings include: Review of the facility's Pharmacy policy titled, Medication Administration - General Guidelines, revised 01/01/2019, revealed medications were administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices. Per review, the individual who administered the medication dose was to record the administration on the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) directly after the medication was given. Further review revealed at the end of each medication pass, the person administering the medications was to review the MAR to ensure the necessary doses were administered and documented. Review of the Facesheet for R22 revealed the facility admitted the resident on 07/14/2024, with diagnoses that included: dementia, fracture…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, which had the potential to affect 155 of the facility's 155 residents who consumed food from the kitchen. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Dry Storage, revised 06/2025, revealed food items stored in the original packaging and had been opened, were to be closed securely to protect the product. Per review, all items were to be checked at the time of delivery and any severely dented cans or damaged products were to be returned. Continued review revealed questionable dented cans were to be placed in a designated area for thorough review soon after delivery. Additionally, any non-Time/Temperature Controlled for Food Safety (TCS) food product was to be stored in a clean and dry location; not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination. Review of the facility policy titled, Refrigerator and Freezer Storage, revised 06/2025, revealed food containers were to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, policy, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it developed, implemented, and maintained an effective, comprehensive Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) system that focused on the development, implementation, and evaluation of adverse events to ensure necessary corrective action was taken regarding its pharmacy program. The findings include: Review of the undated facilities policy document with identification at the bottom of the page, as follows: Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Policy, Page 32, R/3-2025, revealed that the QAPI program committee was responsible for implementing and maintaining an ongoing systemwide process of quality improvement. In an interview with the Director of Health Information Management (HIM) on 03/10/2026 at 4:21 PM, she stated she had been in her position for the last two and a half years. She said the facility's QAPI committee met monthly unless an emergency meeting was needed. The Director of HIM explained that the last QAPI meeting was an emergency meeting held in January related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,017 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-12-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KY