No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

NHC Healthcare - Garden City

9405 Hwy 17 Bypass, Garden City, SC 29576 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 148 certified beds · (843) 650-2213 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (843) 650-2213 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
$4,147 in federal fines
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • the CMS record shows $4,147 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-09)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
9250 Highway 17 Byp · (843) 215-5102 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2872 S Highway 17 · (843) 357-3985 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.8 mi
901 Garden City Conn · (843) 651-3528 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(800) 922-5431 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.3%11.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%3.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%12.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.3%21.0%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.1%90.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.2%16.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.0%15.3%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.9%78.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.4%24.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.8%13.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.732.041.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.821.841.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 326 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 178 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.2%CMS range 42.9–52.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 8.7–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge76.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.2%CMS range 6.7–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.85
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.19
RN hoursweekends
39.2%
Total nursing turnover
37.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 136.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

0
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-01)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were properly stored in 3 of 7 medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage In the Facility documented, Policy: Medications and biological's are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. I. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal. J. Medication storage areas are kept clean, well lit, and free of clutter and extreme temperatures and humidity. K. Medication storage conditions are monitored on a quarterly basis by the consultant pharmacist or pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident (R)70. Findings include: The facility did not provide a policy related to Oxygen Administration. Review of R70's Face Sheet revealed R70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: unspecified dementia, moderate, with mood disturbance Note: SEE PSYCH NOTES, solitary pulmonary nodule, basal cell carcinoma of skin of nose, hypertensive chronic kidney disease with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease, stage 3b, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, unspecified osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, recurrent, anxiety disorder, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, insomnia, chronic respiratory failure, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, syncope and collapse, and dependence on supplemental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent. The facility additionally failed to ensure an ordered medication for Resident (R)526 was administered timely. The medication administration error rate was 12.12 percent. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures revised on 01/01/19, documented, Purpose: To administer oral medications in a safe, accurate, and effective manner. Review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the Medication Administration Record PRIOR to administering medications to each resident. Pour correct number of tablets or capsules into the medication cup, taking care to avoid touching the tablet or capsule, unless wearing gloves. During an observation of medication pass on 01/08/25 at 7:44 AM, revealed Registered Nurse (RN)1 dropped a pill on the medication cart and picked the pill up with the medication wrapper and put it in the medication cup. The pill was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of manufacturer guidelines, the facility failed to ensure no significant medication errors for Resident (R)85 and R86. Specifically, R85's insulin pen was not primed prior to administering and an extended release medication for R86 was crushed and placed in applesauce with all the other medications for 2 of 4 residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the Manufacturer's Recommendations titled, Insulin Administration Using an Insulin Pen, documents, How to Use . 7. Wipe the tip of the pen where the needle will attach with an alcohol swab or cotton ball moistened with alcohol. 8. Remove the protective pull tab from the needle and screw it onto the pen until snug (but not too tight.) 9. Removed the plastic outer cap and inner needle cap. 10. Look at the dose window and turn the dosage knob to 2 units. 11. Holding the pen with the needle pointing upwards, press the button until at least a drop of insulin appears. this will prime the needle and remove any air from the needle. Repeat this step if needed until a drop appears.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-13 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of Resident Council meeting minutes, facility recipe review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have sufficient dietary staff to assure resident meals were served as scheduled and standardized recipes were followed to provide properly cooked, well-seasoned and hot food to residents. The facility's failure to have sufficient dietary staff to prepare and serve meals had the potential to affect 127 residents who received meals that were prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Meal Service & Patient Meal Delivery, with a revised date of 11/2020, revealed Meals will be planned and served at regular times comparable to normal mealtimes in the community and/or based on patient's needs and preferences . Guidelines 1. Mealtimes will be planned and posted in areas which are accessible to patients and families. Review of the facility's Meal Service Distribution and Time Sheet, updated on 10/10/18, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R)55) out of 29 sampled residents, was provided personal privacy. This had the potential for the risk of R55 not being provided dignity and the potential for psychological harm. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Privacy in the Patient Rights (undated) provided by the Administrator revealed .we provide you with privacy so that you may maintain a dignified existence .In your accommodations you will be afforded at least visual privacy . Review of R55's undated admission Record located on the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of R55's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/13/23 and located in his EMR under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 13 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to determine if self-administration of a nasal spray was safe and clinically appropriate for one (Resident (R) 10) of 29 sampled residents. This failure placed the resident at risk for inappropriate and unsafe medication use. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medication, dated 01/01/19, indicated, .residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there is a prescriber's order to self-administer . Review of R10's undated Face Sheet, located in the electronic medication record (EMR) under the Resident tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the resident's EMR under the RAI tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable environment for one (Resident (R) 41) of 29 sampled residents. Specifically, R41's bed was not maintained in good condition and comfortable for the resident. Findings include: Review of R41's undated Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Resident tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Parkinson's disease. Review of R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/04/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of 15, indicating R41 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of a Maintenance Request, dated 03/23/23 provided by the Maintenance Partner (MP) from a shelf at the nurses' station, revealed the following request for R41's bed: Feet will not go up or down. This request was marked as completed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit discharge a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment within the required timeframe for one (Resident (R) 260) of three residents reviewed for MDS 3.0 Missing Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) Assessment. Findings include: Review of MDS 3.0 Missing OBRA Assessment with a run date of 04/06/23, revealed three residents with potentially missing assessments. Review of R260's undated Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Resident tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged from the facility on 07/18/22. Review of R260's discharge MDS, located in the resident's EMR under the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/18/22, revealed the MDS was in process. During an interview on 04/12/23 at 1:13 PM, the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) confirmed R260's discharge MDS had not been transmitted. MDSC further stated, That is a missed MDS.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of hospital documentation, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R)360) out of 29 sampled residents, was provided surgical wound treatment for his biliary tube (allows bile to flow out from a blocked bile duct) insertion/surgical site. This had the potential for the increased risk of biliary tube complications for R360. Findings include: The facility did not have a Biliary Tube policy for review. Review of R360's .Hospital Discharge Summary dated 02/28/23 located under the Documents tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed .Biliary and Gallbladder: Unchanged percutaneous biliary drainage stent tip terminating in the duodenum . Discharge Instructions Wound Care keep wound clean and dry . Review of R360's Face Sheet (undated) located in the EMR revealed R360 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] and was discharged on 03/13/23. R360 had multiple diagnoses to include obstruction of bile duct, malignant neoplasm of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, resident selective menu review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve foods that were selected and written on a selective menu for one (Resident (R) 89) of four sampled residents reviewed for menus being followed and adequate. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Menu Planning and Service, with a revised date of 11/2020, revealed Cycle menus, either selective or non-selective, are used, written and revised periodically . 9. Overall meal acceptability, therapeutic modifications and patient preferences, needs and allergies/intolerances will be monitored for accuracy by the Dietitian and/or FNS (Director of Food and Nutrition Services) Manager. Review of the admission Record located in R89's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/05/23 located in the EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, recipe review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve food that was properly cooked and well-seasoned to three (Resident (R) 42, R98, and R89) of four sampled residents reviewed for food palatability. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Recipes, with a revised date of 11/2020, revealed Standardized recipes will be used for all menu items to ensure consistent quality food. Guidelines 1. Recipes will be provided for each menu cycle and will be used for all food preparation. Instructions will be provided on recipes for proper preparation in order to consistently yield attractive, nutritious, flavorful, and pleasurable foods. Each recipe will state the Critical Control Points (CCP) to ensure food safety is maintained throughout the food production process. 1. Review of R42's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/07/23 located under the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide thickened liquids in the prescribed consistency for one (Resident (R)105) of one sampled residents who had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty with swallowing) and received thickened liquids. Findings include: Review of the admission Record located in R105's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dysphagia and Alzheimer's disease. Review of R105's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/05/23 located in the EMR under the RAI tab revealed R105 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also indicated R105 experienced coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medications, had complaints of difficulty or pain when swallowing and required limited assistance with one-person physical assistance with eating.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$4,147 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $4,147 — penalty dated 2025-01-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5NHC Healthcare - MauldinGreenville, SC 2 of 5NHC Healthcare - CharlestonCharleston, SC 2 of 5NHC Healthcare, GlasgowGlasgow, KY 2 of 5Nhc Healthcare RossvilleRossville, GA 2 of 5Nhc Healthcare, AnnistonAnniston, AL 2 of 5Nhc Healthcare, FranklinFranklin, TN 2 of 5Nhc Healthcare, JoplinJoplin, MO 2 of 5Nhc Healthcare, SpringfieldSpringfield, TN 2 of 5Osage Beach Rehabilitation And Health Care CenterOsage Beach, MO 2 of 5White Oak Manor-ShelbyShelby, NC 3 of 5Adamsplace, LLCMurfreesboro, TN 3 of 5NHC Healthcare - GreenwoodGreenwood, SC 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, Ft SandersKnoxville, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, HendersonvilleHendersonville, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, KnoxvilleKnoxville, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, LewisburgLewisburg, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, PulaskiPulaski, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, SmithvilleSmithville, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, SpartaSparta, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, TullahomaTullahoma, TN 3 of 5The Health Center At Richland PlaceNashville, TN 3 of 5The MeadowsNashville, TN 3 of 5White Oak Manor - YorkYork, SC 4 of 5NHC HealthCare - North AugustaNorth Augusta, SC 4 of 5NHC Healthcare - BlufftonOkatie, SC 4 of 5NHC Healthcare - LexingtonWest Columbia, SC 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, ChattanoogaChattanooga, TN 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, ColumbiaColumbia, TN 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, DeslogeDesloge, MO 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, Maryland HeightsMaryland Heights, MO 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, MilanMilan, TN 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, Oak RidgeOak Ridge, TN 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, OakwoodLewisburg, TN 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, St CharlesSaint Charles, MO 4 of 5Nhc Place At Cool SpringsFranklin, TN 4 of 5White Oak Manor - CharlestonCharleston, SC 4 of 5White Oak Manor - SpartanburgSpartanburg, SC 5 of 5HeartlandNashville, TN 5 of 5Holston Health & Rehabilitation CenterKnoxville, TN 5 of 5Macon Health Care CenterMacon, MO

Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • MORGAN STANLEY — investment firm · 5.40% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • VANGUARD GROUP INC — investment firm · 9.09% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
NHC/DELAWARE INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 10/01/2001
MOORHOUSE, BRADLEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2018
NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATIONOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2001
NHC-OP LPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2001
DODSON, VICKIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2019
KIDD, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2017
SANTIAGO, KENNETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2019
SELLARS, ALEXANDERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/13/2025
SHELLY, TIMOTHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/12/2024
TAYLOR, SKYLERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2016
USSERY, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2017
BLACKROCK INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2019
DIMENSIONAL FUND ADVISORS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/07/2023
MORGAN STANLEYOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/08/2024
NATIONAL HEALTH CORPORATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2001
VANGUARD GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 43%Medicare 22%Other / private 35%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$294per resident / day
operating cost
$8,946per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$339per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in SC

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the South Carolina Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in South Carolina
$9,034/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,612/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,350/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 425324. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next