No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Nhc Healthcare, Milan

8017 Dogwood Lane, Milan, TN 38358 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 117 certified beds · (731) 686-8373 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (731) 686-8373 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Aug 2019Resident-funds citation (F0569)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4039 Highland Ave · (731) 723-3668 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6078 S 1st St · (731) 238-3800 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6042 S 1st St · (731) 686-3807 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1075 E Van Hook St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.7%14.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.4%6.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.1%1.8%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%13.8%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.7%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.9%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.9%31.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.4%5.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.1%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.8%16.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.7%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%79.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.1%22.6%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.6%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.051.671.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.261.561.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 178 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.4%CMS range 50.1–65.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.0–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 5.5–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.81
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.29
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.85
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
62.2%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 117 beds and averages 96.6 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-27)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2021-06-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, job description review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards when hot water temperatures ranging from 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 138 degrees F were found in 23 of 92 (Resident #2, #11, #13, #23, #27, #28, #33, #46, #58, #63, #65, #66, #71, #76, #77, #82, #84, #87, #88, #90, #95, #105 and #106) Residents' bathrooms. Eleven Residents who were physically and/or cognitively impaired (Residents #11, #27, #28, #33, #46, #63, #65, #66, #71, #77, and #95) resided in a room with elevated hot water temperatures and nine of the cognitively impaired residents were able to access the hot water in their rooms. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Water Quality Management Program, revealed .committed to providing a safe environment for our patients. Review of the undated TELS [(The Equipment Lifecycle System) - a platform used to promote a safer environment]: Test and Log the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, resident trust account review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to refund the residents' funds within 30 days of death or discharge for 2 of 52 sampled residents (Resident #109 and #110) reviewed for trust fund account statements. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Patient Trust, dated 10/2010, revealed .The balance remaining for a patient's trust fund account should be refunded as soon as all transactions are fully accounted for after a patient is discharged or deceased .the funds should be refunded within 30 days of death or discharge. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #109 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Pneumonia, Dysphagia, and Dementia. Review of the Nurse's Note dated [DATE], revealed .Death pronounced at this time . Review of Resident #109's Quarterly Trust Fund statement from [DATE] through [DATE], revealed an account balance of $3,843.98. 3. Review of the medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for residents with a percutaneous enteral gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube inserted through the skin and into the stomach to administer medications and supplements) when staff failed to administer the ordered enteral feeding and failed to check the residual volume for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #4 and #97) reviewed for tube feedings. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Peg tube medication administration, dated 12/2019, revealed .Check to see if the exit of the tube [PEG tube] was marked upon initial insertion. If tube was not marked check gastric residual volume unless the patient is able to verbalize discomfort such as nausea/vomiting, bloating. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Aphasia, Dysphagia, Diabetes, and Heart Failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain emergency supplies at bedside for 2 of 2 (Resident #4 and #97) sampled residents reviewed for tracheostomy care. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including Hemiplegia, Tracheostomy, Chronic Respiratory failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dysphagia, and Heart Failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not completed due to Resident #4 was unable to be interviewed. Resident #4 was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) and received Tracheostomy care. Review of the Care Plan dated [DATE], revealed .He [Resident #4] will not exhibit s/s [signs and symptoms] of complications r/t [related to] presence of tracheostomy . Observations in Resident #4's on [DATE] at 10:25 AM and [DATE] at 8:05 AM, in Resident #4's room,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure posted Daily Staffing information was accurate for dates 8/26/2025 and 8/27/2025. The findings include: Observations in the hallway at the North Wing nurse's station and the South Wing nurse's station on 8/26/2025 at 7:31 AM, 10:10 AM, and 1:22 PM, revealed the posted Daily Staffing information was dated 8/25/2025. Observations in the hallway at the North Wing nurse's station and the South Wing nurse's station on 8/27/2025 at 9:00 AM and 10:35 AM, revealed the Daily Staffing information was dated 8/26/2025. During an interview on 8/27/2025 at 10:37 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) confirmed that she was responsible for posting the Daily Staffing at the North Wing nurse's station and the South Wing nurse's station, and the Daily Staffing should be posted first thing in the morning. During an interview and observation at the North Wing nurses' station on 8/27/2025 at 10:46 AM, the ADON confirmed the Daily Staffing posted was dated 8/26/2025.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the Refrigerator Temperature Log review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored when 1of 3 (South Wing) medication refrigerator temperature logs had no documentation for 13 out of 26 days. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's Refrigerator Temperature Log, dated 8/2025, revealed .Proper medication refrigerator temperature range is between 36 [degrees] - (and) 46 [degrees] Fahrenheit. 2. Observation in the South Wing Medication Storage Room on 8/27/2025 at 9:36 AM, revealed the Refrigerator Temperature Log dated 8/2025, revealed there was no documentation for the refrigerator temperature on 8/3/2025-8/5/2025, 8/9/2025, 8/10/2025, 8/12/2025, 8/14/2025, 8/16/2025, 8/17/2025, 8/20/2025, and 8/22/2025-8/24/2025. 3. During an interview on 8/27/2025 at 3:50 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked how often the medication refrigerator temperatures should be checked and logged. The DON stated, Daily. The DON confirmed that staff would not be able to ensure refrigerated medications were being stored at the proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed when 1 of 1 staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) B) failed to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) and failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration for 1 of 5 (Resident #11) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Hand Washing and Hand Sanitizer, revealed .Hand Hygiene is the primary means to prevent the spread of infection.Wash or sanitize hands after contact with patient .removal of gloves. Review of the facility policy titled, .Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 2/2025, revealed .Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refers to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms .that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact activities .Providers and partners must wear gloves and a gown for the following.Device care or use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, job description review, record review, observations, and interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's environment was safe when 1 of 64 resident rooms on the 100 Hall was a vacant and being renovated. The unlocked and unattended 100 Hall room contained hazardous chemicals and materials including paint, an uncovered bucket with a mixture of paint and water liquid used to clean paint rollers, caulking, nails, screws, and sheetrock mud, and was accessible by residents. The findings include: 1. Review of the undated facility policy titled NHC Storage of Hazardous Chemicals, revealed Hazardous chemicals are to be stored out of the reach of patients . 2. Review of the Administrator's job description signed and dated 12/8/2022, revealed .The Administrator has complete administrative and managerial responsibilities within the health care center .Ability to interpret and implement regulations (state and federal) .Promote safety awareness .Assures compliance with State and Federal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Partner Handbook and Social Work Services Manual, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain or enhance resident dignity and respect when 4 of 18 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #5, #6, and #7) failed to knock before entering a resident's room and did not use courtesy titles to address residents. The findings include: Review of the facility's undated handbook titled, [Named company] Partner Handbook, revealed .CARING IN A BETTER WAY DAY BY DAY .combines the best clinical care with the best customer satisfaction for patients .Respect your privacy, dignity . Review of the facility's Social Work Services Manual, revised 6/2006, revealed .The Guarantee of rights that depends on the actions of PARTNERS are requirements for personnel .The right to respect and dignity are requirements for the partners . Observation in Resident #44's room during dining on 6/28/21 at 11:41 AM, revealed CNA #1 stated, .she is a feeder, within hearing distance of the resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention guidance, policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to food was served under sanitary conditions when 6 of 18 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, #3, #5, #6, and #7) failed to don appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering a contact isolation room, failed to perform hand hygiene after touching potentially contaminated objects before serving residents meals, used their bare hands to handle a resident's food, failed to perform hand hygiene before and after glove use, failed to perform hand hygiene between serving residents, and used long acrylic nails to open a carton of milk. The findings include: Review of the facility's specialized CNA training titled, 000 Training revised 2/11/2013, revealed .MEAL DELIVERY - DINING ROOM .HANDS SHOULD BE WASHED ANYTIME YOU COME IN CONTACT WITH PATIENT OR EQUIPMENT . Review of the facility's policy titled, .TRANSMISSION-BASED PROCEDURES…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's indwelling urinary catheter bag did not touch the floor for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #13) reviewed with indwelling urinary catheters. The findings include: Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Epilepsy, Chronic Respiratory Failure, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Anoxic Brain Damage, Tracheostomy, and Gastrostomy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #13 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the Physician Order dated 5/18/2021, revealed .Indwelling Catheter . Observation in Resident #13's room on 6/28/2021 at 10:56 AM and 4:45 PM, revealed that the indwelling urinary catheter bag was lying on the floor. During an interview on 6/30/2021 at 12:34 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that the indwelling urinary catheter bag should not be in the floor.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 2 (Resident #84) abuse incidents reviewed. The findings include: The facility's Patient Protection and Response Policy for Allegations/Incidents of Abuse, Neglect, Misappropriation of Property and Exploitation policy revised 12/11/17 documented, .INTERNAL INVESTIGATION POLICY .All events reported as possible abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of patient property will be investigated to determine whether the alleged abuse, neglect, misappropriation of patient property or exploitation did or did not take place. The Administrator or Director of Nurses will determine the direction of the investigation once notified of alleged incident .The investigation is conducted immediately under the following circumstances .When it is identified that an alleged incident may have occurred .When there is a question as to whether to conduct an investigation, it is best to do so . Medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, Infection Control Manual review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for 1 of 2 (Resident #60) sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheters and failed to provide effective dialysis communication for 1 of 2 (Resident #340) sampled residents reviewed for isolation. The findings include: 1. The facility's undated USE OF FOLEY CATHETER policy documented, .Follow the Physician Order for use of the foley catheter .decrease risk of infection related to retention of urine in the bladder . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, Dementia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Diabetes, Depression, Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Retention of Urine, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. A physician's order dated 6/4/19 documented, .Indwelling Catheter change every month due to Neurogenic Bladder/Urinary Retention . 3. Observations in Resident #60's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATION — 69 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.5-0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 68 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5NHC Healthcare - MauldinGreenville, SC 2 of 5NHC Healthcare - CharlestonCharleston, SC 2 of 5NHC Healthcare, GlasgowGlasgow, KY 2 of 5Nhc Healthcare RossvilleRossville, GA 2 of 5Nhc Healthcare, AnnistonAnniston, AL 2 of 5Nhc Healthcare, FranklinFranklin, TN 2 of 5Nhc Healthcare, JoplinJoplin, MO 2 of 5Nhc Healthcare, SpringfieldSpringfield, TN 2 of 5Osage Beach Rehabilitation And Health Care CenterOsage Beach, MO 2 of 5White Oak Manor-ShelbyShelby, NC 3 of 5Adamsplace, LLCMurfreesboro, TN 3 of 5NHC Healthcare - GreenwoodGreenwood, SC 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, Ft SandersKnoxville, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, HendersonvilleHendersonville, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, KnoxvilleKnoxville, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, LewisburgLewisburg, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, PulaskiPulaski, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, SmithvilleSmithville, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, SpartaSparta, TN 3 of 5Nhc Healthcare, TullahomaTullahoma, TN 3 of 5The Health Center At Richland PlaceNashville, TN 3 of 5The MeadowsNashville, TN 3 of 5White Oak Manor - YorkYork, SC 4 of 5NHC HealthCare - North AugustaNorth Augusta, SC 4 of 5NHC Healthcare - BlufftonOkatie, SC 4 of 5NHC Healthcare - Garden CityGarden City, SC 4 of 5NHC Healthcare - LexingtonWest Columbia, SC 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, ChattanoogaChattanooga, TN 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, ColumbiaColumbia, TN 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, DeslogeDesloge, MO 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, Maryland HeightsMaryland Heights, MO 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, Oak RidgeOak Ridge, TN 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, OakwoodLewisburg, TN 4 of 5Nhc Healthcare, St CharlesSaint Charles, MO 4 of 5Nhc Place At Cool SpringsFranklin, TN 4 of 5White Oak Manor - CharlestonCharleston, SC 4 of 5White Oak Manor - SpartanburgSpartanburg, SC 5 of 5HeartlandNashville, TN 5 of 5Holston Health & Rehabilitation CenterKnoxville, TN 5 of 5Macon Health Care CenterMacon, MO

Showing 40 of 68; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • MORGAN STANLEY — investment firm · 5.40% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
  • VANGUARD GROUP INC — investment firm · 9.09% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BIDWELL, CHARLESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/15/2021
NATIONAL HEALTHCARE CORPORATIONOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
NHC-OP LPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2000
CARROLL, LORENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
DODSON, VICKIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2019
GRAVES, REBECCAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/05/1992
KIDD, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2017
MCHALE, PATRICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2016
SHELLY, TIMOTHYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/12/2024
USSERY, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2017
BLACKROCK INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/20/2010
NATIONAL HEALTH CORPORATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
VANGUARD GROUP INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/30/2006

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.4M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 11%Other / private 28%

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$336per resident / day
operating cost
$10,224per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$295per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Tennessee Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Tennessee
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,845/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 445069. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next