No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fall River Jewish Home

538 Robeson Street, Fall River, MA 02720 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 62 certified beds · (508) 679-6172 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (508) 679-6172 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)5 actual-harm citations$52,702 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 5 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (70) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $52,702 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-20)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
235 Hanover St · (508) 676-7300 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
363 Highland Ave · (508) 973-7375 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
18 Pear St · (410) 430-9264 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Ruggles Park, 270 Seabury St · (508) 324-2000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
146 Hanover St · (508) 673-3965

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.7%16.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%5.1%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms35.6%15.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.5%3.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.5%15.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.9%19.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.5%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.6%21.2%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.9%21.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.0%77.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.7%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.5%11.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.761.881.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.471.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 87 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.8%CMS range 39.8–57.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 7.5–14.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge35.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting91.4%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 4.0–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.43
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
41.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 61.2 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 1 bed typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.09 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-10)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

70 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for two of three sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure they were free from physical and/or verbal abuse by staff members when; 1) On 2/19/24, Resident #2, who was alert and oriented, reported to a staff member that during an 11:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift (later determined to be on 2/18/24) he/she had a fall, that Nurse #2 picked him/her up, put him/her back into bed, that Nurse #2 then put his hand over his/her mouth and verbally threatened him/her saying he (Nurse #2) would hurt his/her (Resident #2's) family if he/she told anyone. Resident #2 told staff he/she was scared of Nurse #2, and he/she became visibly upset and cried even weeks later, when interviewed regarding the incident. 2) On 03/06/24, Resident #1, who had significant cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff to meet his/her care needs, spit food out at CNA #1 and in response, CNA #1 grabbed both of Resident #1's arms, forcefully shook him/her, and then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three Residents (#43, #34, and #22), out of a total sample of 17 residents, received care and treatment to prevent and to promote healing of pressure injuries. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #43, to implement treatments as ordered to a pressure injury of the left ischium (forms the lower and back region of the hip bone) that became an infected stage 4 pressure injury, and worsening bilateral heel pressure injuries; 2. For Resident #34, to ensure monitoring and pressure related interventions were consistently implemented to prevent the development of a pressure injury to the Resident's bilateral heels; and 3. For Resident #22 to ensure interventions were implemented to maintain skin integrity of a contracted hand. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol, undated, indicated the following: -the nursing staff and physician will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure sores…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-02-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Resident's physician about changes in condition, to re-evaluate the potential need to alter the treatment plan for one Resident (#43), from a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the primary physician of: a. a change in a new pressure injury in order to alter the treatment plan to prevent deterioration, and b. a significant weight loss of over 9% in 7 weeks in order to alter the plan of care to prevent an additional weight loss of 4.96%. Findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses of dementia and hypertension. a. Review of the nursing progress notes indicated on 11/20/22 Resident #43 had developed an area to the left buttock with a darkened center. A new order was implemented for normal saline wash, pat dry, followed by a dry protective dressing and to change the dressing daily and as needed. Review of the Weekly Skin Assessment, dated as occurring on 11/17/22 and recorded on 11/20/22, indicated there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-02-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented for the treatment of bilateral hand contractures for one Resident (#22) out of a sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure bilateral palmar guards were in place as ordered by the physician to maintain and prevent further contracture and increased pain with range of motion. Findings include: Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in July 2019 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's dementia and contracture of the right and left shoulder. Review of the 12/15/22 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated Resident #22 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and had impaired functional limitation in range of motion in both upper and lower extremities. Review of the medical record indicated the following Physician's Orders: -Bilateral palmar guards on during the daytime hours-after morning care-assess skin integrity (5/24/21) -Bilateral palmar guards to be removed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-02-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to monitor the nutritional status for Resident #43 with an unplanned, significant weight loss, out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement nutritional interventions to prevent further weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Weight Measurement, revised in February 2022, indicated the frequency of weights will be determined by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) based on the resident's individual needs. When a significant weight fluctuation of 5% more or less is noted, the resident will be weighed based on the determination of the IDT. The resident's plan of care will be updated accordingly. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with diagnoses of dementia. Review of the medical record failed to include a care plan to indicate the nutritional goals and interventions for Resident #43. Review of the medical record indicated the following weights: 11/3/22: 132.1 pounds (lbs.) 12/23/22: 119.0 lbs. (a loss of 9.92%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC-a flexible tube inserted through a vein in one's arm and passed through to larger veins near the heart, used to deliver medications intravenously (IV)), consistent with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#12 and #166), out of a total of 2 residents receiving intravenous therapy. Specifically, the facility failed to change the PICC dressing per professional standards. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The purpose of the procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter-related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or well dressings. - Maintain sterile dressing (transparent semi-permeable membrane (TSM) dressing or sterile gauze) dressing for all central vascular access devices. - Change the dressing if it becomes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program with documentation of the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities and failed to maintain a QAPI program which addressed the full range of care and services including clinical care. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, last reviewed 2/28/23 indicated the following: -QAPI plan addresses: -clinical care including quality measures, falls, medication errors, pressure ulcers, incident reports, infection control and quality of life including concerns brought up through resident council -the Administrator is responsible and accountable for developing, leading and closely monitoring a QAPI program -the QAPI Committee meets monthly and maintains minutes of all activity -the Committee maintains a QAPI manual that houses meeting minutes, project [NAME], performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program with documentation of the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action for resident concerns regarding food temperatures. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement, last reviewed 2/28/23, indicated the following: -QAPI plan addresses: -clinical care including quality measures, falls, medication errors, pressure ulcers, incident reports, infection control and quality of life including concerns brought up through resident council -the Administrator is responsible and accountable for developing, leading and closely monitoring a QAPI program -the QAPI Committee meets monthly and maintains minutes of all activity -the Committee maintains a QAPI manual that houses meeting minutes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed to implement control measures for Legionella (bacteria that can cause Legionnaires' disease, a serious type of pneumonia) and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens that could grow and spread in the facility's water system. Findings include: Review of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Memorandum titled Requirement to Reduce Legionella Risk in Healthcare Facility Water Systems to Prevent Cases and Outbreaks of Legionnaires' Disease, revised July 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: - In manmade water systems, Legionella can grow and spread to susceptible hosts, such as persons who are at least [AGE] years old, smokers, and those with underlying medical conditions such as chronic lung disease or immunosuppression. Legionella can grow in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#56), out of a total sample of 16 residents, was assessed by the Interdisciplinary Care Team for self-administration of all their medications and had a physician's order to self-administer medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Administering Medications, undated, indicated but was not limited to: - Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the Interdisciplinary Care Planning Team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of the facility's policy titled Safety and Supervision of Residents, last revised April 2018, indicated but was not limited to: - Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. - As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and/or practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures for the investigation of allegations of abuse, protection of residents during investigations and reporting of allegations and investigative findings for one Resident (#50), out of a total sample of 16 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to initiate their abuse policy after an allegation of potential abuse was reported on a grievance form dated 2/25/25. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Clinical Services, Subject: Abuse, dated March 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Any complaint of, observation of, or suspicion of resident abuse, mistreatment or neglect is to be thoroughly investigated and reported. -Action: -Immediately protect Resident from alleged abuse. -Immediately suspend employee pending investigation. -The facility will notify the Department of Public Health (DPH) and Local Law Enforcement no later than two hours after abuse allegation was received. -Investigation: The administrative staff or nursing supervisor assumes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report a potential allegation of abuse for one Resident (#50), out of a total sample of 16 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Clinical Services, Subject: Abuse, dated March 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Any complaint of, observation of, or suspicion of resident abuse, mistreatment or neglect is to be thoroughly investigated and reported. -The facility will notify the Department of Public Health (DPH) and Local Law Enforcement no later than two hours after abuse allegation was received. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including dementia and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/31/25, indicated Resident #50 had moderate cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 out of 15. The MDS further indicated Resident #50 was independent for most activity of daily living tasks. Review of the facility's Grievance book indicated a grievance reported by Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate a potential allegation of abuse for one Resident (#50), out of a total sample of 16 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Clinical Services, Subject: Abuse, dated March 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Any complaint of, observation of, or suspicion of resident abuse, mistreatment or neglect is to be thoroughly investigated and reported. -Action: -Immediately protect Resident from alleged abuse. -Immediately suspend employee pending investigation. -Investigation: The administrative staff or nursing supervisor assumes responsibility for: -Immediate investigation into the alleged incident (during the shift it occurred on). -Interview resident and other resident witnesses. This interview is to be dated, documented and signed by supervisor. -Interview staff member implicated. Have employee document their knowledge/version of incident in written narrative that is dated and signed. -Interview staff witnesses or other available witnesses. Witnesses are to document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in a safe and secure manner as required. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure one of two medication carts was clean and free of loose pills and debris. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medication, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. On 6/9/25 at 3:53 P.M., the surveyor observed the Unit Two medication cart to have a large amount of loose pills and paper debris on the bottom of the second, third, and fourth drawers. During an interview on 6/9/25 at 3:53 P.M., Nurse #3 said the medication cart should be clean and free of loose pills and debris. Nurse #3 said she was unaware when the medication cart was last cleaned, but it was supposed to have been cleaned weekly on the night shift. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, and was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for two of two test trays. Findings include: Review of Food Committee Minutes indicated the following resident concerns and facility solutions: a) 1/6/25 RESIDENT CONCERNS: Food cold when arrives to resident rooms; SOLUTIONS: The kitchen is trying to keep the food hotter. Kitchen manager is looking into new food trucks. b) 3/6/25 SOLUTIONS: In process of ordering new food delivery carts. c) 4/28/25 SOLUTIONS: In process of ordering new food delivery carts. d) 5/8/25 RESIDENT CONCERNS: The residents saying their food is cold when they get it in their rooms; SOLUTIONS: The Kitchen Manager is still trying to get new food trucks so it will keep the food hotter; CONCLUSION: Four Residents in attendance let the Kitchen Manager know the breakfast and lunch food is hotter. During the initial resident screening on 6/8/25, the survey team identified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 55 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow their professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the main kitchen grout and coving was maintained in a sanitary and safe condition; and 2. Ensure the refrigerators in two of two unit kitchenettes were maintained in a sanitary and safe condition. Findings include: 1. Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised January 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 1-2 Definitions 1-201 Applicability and Terms Defined 1-201.10 Statement of Application and Listing of Terms. Easily Cleanable. (1) Easily cleanable means a characteristic of a surface that: (a) Allows effective removal of soil by normal cleaning methods; (b) Is dependent on the material, design, construction, and installation of the surface; and (c) Varies with the likelihood of the surface's role in introducing pathogenic or toxigenic agents or other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to designate a person who met the minimum qualifications to serve as the Food Service Director (FSD). Specifically, the facility did not employ a full-time dietitian, or have a qualified dietary employee who met the minimum qualifications to serve as the FSD. Findings include: During an interview on 6/6/24 at 8:45 A.M., the Food Service Director (FSD) said he is not a certified food service manager. He said he was going to take the test, but he has not registered for the class yet. He said he has not taken any formal training classes to be a food service manager at this time. He said he has work experience as a cook at a local restaurant and hospital, and he has completed the ServSafe course. The surveyor reviewed the FSD certificate which indicated he completed ServSafe Food Handler online course and exam 4/6/24. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 1:30 P.M., the Administrator said she was not aware the current FSD did not have the required qualifications to serve as the Food Service Director. She said the Dietitian only works…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy and professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the main kitchen was pest free and maintained in a sanitary condition; 2. Ensure residents were not served undercooked, unpasteurized shell eggs; 3. Ensure food items were properly labeled and dated in the main kitchen refrigerators; 4. Ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination (transfer of pathogens from one surface to another) and ensure the use of gloves was limited to a single use task; and 5. Ensure staff obtained cooked food temperature prior to serving to residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Cleaning and Sanitation of Dining and Food Service Areas, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The food and nutrition service staff will maintain the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-13 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program, as evidenced by small black flies and sanitation concerns in the main kitchen, and small black flies in the main dining room throughout the survey. Findings include: Review the facility's policy titled Pest Control, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Routine pest control procedures will be in place. If pests are seen in the kitchen the Director of Food and Nutrition services or designee shall be informed describing where the pest was seen and when. Appropriate action will be taken to eliminate any reported pest situation in the department. Review of the 2022 Food Code by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicated, but was not limited to: -6-501.111 Controlling Pests. Insects and other pests are capable of transmitting disease to humans by contaminating food and food-contact surfaces. Effective measures must be taken to eliminate their presence in food establishments. -6-501.111 Controlling Pests. The PREMISES shall be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide services that met professional standards of quality for one Resident (#303), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the facility failed for Resident #303, to implement orders for the care and management of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC-a thin flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and guided into a large vein above the right side of the heart called the superior vena cava (SVC) used for intravenous (IV) medications), specifically for monitoring and flushing of a PICC line and changing the equipment for the PICC line. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated: -Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescribers that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure quality of care was provided, according to the plan of care, facility protocols, and professional standards of practice for two Residents (#28 and #38), out of 15 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #28, to ensure wound care treatments were reflective of recommendations from the physician wound consultant and in line with the primary physician treatment plan; and 2. For Resident #38, to ensure wound care treatments and preventative recommendations from the physician wound consultant were implemented and provided in accordance with the treatment orders. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dressing, Dry/Clean, undated, indicated the following: -the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the application of dry, clean dressings -verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure -review the resident's care plan, current orders, and diagnoses to determine if there are special resident needs -check the treatment record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, manufacturer's suggestion for use, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff properly labeled all medications stored in 1 of 2 medication carts with the date opened or the Resident's name. Findings include: On 6/06/24 at 1:19 P.M., the surveyor inspected the Unit 3 medication cart with Nurse #1 and observed the following: -A bottle of Artificial Tears for Resident #17, not labeled when opened. -A bottle of Artificial Tears for Resident #8, not labeled when opened. Review of the manufacturer's suggestions for use indicated that Artificial Tears should be discarded 30 days after opening because the preservative inside can start to breakdown and allow bacteria to grow. -A bottle of Latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution (used to treat certain kinds of glaucoma), not labeled with the Resident's name. -A vial of Levemir insulin (long-acting insulin used once to twice daily to control high blood sugar) for Resident #24, not labeled when opened. Review of the manufacturer's suggestions for use indicated that Levemir should be discarded 42 days after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and test tray results, the facility failed to provide food to residents that was palatable and served at appetizing temperatures for both food and drinks. Findings include: During a Resident Group Meeting with the surveyor on 6/7/24 at 11:00 A.M., 14 residents attended the meeting and had the following food complaints: Food is mushy, overcooked, and cold. No fresh vegetables or fruit. The always available menu is not always available. The kitchen only makes a certain number of items and if they run out, the go to food is peanut butter and jelly or grilled cheese sandwiches. During an interview on 6/06/24 at 9:32 A.M., Resident #154 said the eggs are burnt/crispy on the edges and he/she could only eat the center of the egg. During an interview on 6/06/24 at 9:35 A.M., Resident #153 said he/she ordered poached eggs, but you can't eat the edges because they are too crisp. The Resident said last night he/she ordered a hot dog off the anytime menu and never got it. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 10:06 A.M., Resident #3 said the eggs were cold. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed for one Resident (#303), out of a sample of 15 residents, to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was utilized when providing high contact resident care as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Clinical Services-Subject: Precautions to Prevent Infection, dated as last revised 12/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Purpose to comply with all Federal, State, and local heath requirements as well as appropriate Infection Prevention Standards. -EBP fall between standard and contact precautions and require gown and glove use for certain residents during specific high contact resident care activities that have been found to increase risk for Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO) transmission. -Residents defined at risk are those with indwelling medical devices. -High Risk Resident Care Activities include dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linen, changing brief, or assisting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program to measure and improve how antibiotics are prescribed by clinicians and include antibiotic use protocols and monitoring antibiotic use in line with the facility antibiotic stewardship program. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure accurate monitoring of infections and antibiotic use was completed for 12 infection occurrences of 12 Residents (#2, #253, #43, #303, #45, #38, #24, #255, #12, #1, #36, and #45) from the March, April, and May 2024 line list. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The purpose of the Antibiotic Stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. -Orientation, training, and education of staff will emphasize the importance of antibiotic stewardship and will include how inappropriate use of antibiotics affect individual residents and the overall community. -When a resident is admitted from an emergency department, acute care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident representatives were provided the opportunity to participate in the care planning process, to be included in decisions and changes in the care plan, and failed to ensure that care planning meetings were held to review and make changes in the care plan as needed for one Resident (#8), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning- Interdisciplinary Team, undated, indicated the following: -the resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan -care plan meetings are scheduled at the best time of the day for the resident and family when possible -if it is determined that participation of the resident or representative is not practicable for development of the care plan, an explanation is documented in the medical record Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in January 2021 and had an invoked Health Care Proxy. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0576 — isolated
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure mail was delivered, unopened to residents. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain the privacy of Resident #2 by opening his/her mail, completing a form on their behalf and mailing the form back to an agency without ever having presented the mail to the Resident. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in February 2024. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/21/24, indicated Resident #2 scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating he/she was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #2 was their own responsible person for financial and medical decisions. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 12:00 P.M., Resident #2 said the facility Receptionist, who was also responsible for the business office, had opened his/her mail from a community agency, filled out a form and returned the form to the agency. The Resident said the Receptionist had never asked if she could open the Resident's mail and had not notified the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to formulate a written grievance and follow up with one Resident (#2) following a voiced grievance. Specifically, Resident #2 voiced concerns regarding staff opening his/her mail, completing a form on their behalf and mailing the form back to an agency without ever having presented the mail to the Resident, and the Resident had not received follow up from the facility on the concern. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances, last revised December 2018, indicated the following: -The facility will support each resident's right to voice grievances and ensure that after a grievance has been received, the Grievance Official will collaboratively work with team members to resolve the issue and provide written grievance decisions to the resident. -If a resident has a complaint, a staff member should encourage and assist the resident to file a written grievance with the facility using the Grievance/Complaint form. -The Administrator will review the findings with the person investigating the complaint to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure potential misappropriation was reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) no later than 24 hours in accordance with federal guidelines. Specifically, the facility failed to report when the previous facility allegedly kept $2,213.55 of Resident #19's personal money. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Clinical Services: Abuse, revised March 2023, indicated the following: -Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of resident property. -Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. -The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property and exploitation are reported immediately to the Administrator and Director of Nurses of the facility utilizing the chain of command. -The facility will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission, for two Residents (#20 and #153), out of a total sample of 15 residents, that included the instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident, that met professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #20, to implement and initiate a baseline care plan to address mental health diagnoses; and 2. For Resident #153, to provide a copy of the baseline care plan summary to the Resident/Resident Representative. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans- Baseline, dated 7/26/2017, indicated but was not limited to: -To assure that resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission. - Include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including but not limited to: a. Initial goals based on admission orders; b. Physician orders;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed for two Residents (#40 and #2) to include nutritional goals and interventions, out of a total sample of 15 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans- Comprehensive, dated as revised in July 2023, indicated the following: -an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, emotional and psychological needs is developed for each resident -the comprehensive care plan is designed to: incorporate identified problem areas, reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals, reflect treatment goals timetables and objectives in measurable outcomes -assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change 1. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the medical record indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who use psychotropic medications, as needed, were limited to 14 days, or extended beyond 14 days with a documented clinical rationale and duration, for one Resident (#89), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled PRN (as needed) Psychotropic Medications, dated issued 3/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Residents do not receive PRN psychotropic medications unless the medication is necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. All PRN orders for psychotropic medications will not exceed 14 days, including those residents on Hospice. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility in January 2024 with a diagnosis of anxiety. Review of the Physician's Orders indicated the following: -Admit to Hospice for diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain, effective 2/8/24. -Lorazepam give one tablet by mouth every two hours as needed for anxiety, effective 4/24/24 with an end date listed as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to take into consideration the dietary preferences of each resident. Specifically, the facility failed to accommodate preferences of Resident #2 for a high protein diet. The total sample was 15 residents. Findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with a history of bariatric surgery. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/21/24, indicated Resident #2 scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating he/she was cognitively intact. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 12:00 P.M., Resident #2 said he/she had bariatric surgery years prior and was following a high protein, low carbohydrate diet to maintain weight loss. The Resident said when he/she was admitted they had brought their own protein shakes but was now worried about the cost of ordering the protein shakes, which was $52 for 12 bottles. He/she said they were also ordering high protein oatmeal and yogurt. He/she said they had met with the Food Service Director, who had said he was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure diets as ordered by the physician were served in proper form for one Resident (#40), out of a total of 15 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the physician's order to have nectar thick liquids (liquids that have been altered to a thicker consistency for people who have difficulty swallowing) was followed for Resident #40. Findings include: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the Physician's Orders for Resident #40 indicated the Resident was on a ground texture diet with nectar thick liquids. Review of the care plans for Resident #40 failed to include the Resident's diet or nutritional goals. On 6/11/24 at 8:50 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #40 in his/her room having breakfast. The surveyor observed the Resident to have a half cup of coffee left, which was not thickened and a cup of apple juice which was also not thickened. During an interview on 6/11/24 at 8:50 A.M., Nurse #1 said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-06 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was alert and oriented, was able to make his/her needs known and required medication every two hours in an effort to control his/her symptoms related to a progressive brain disease that affected his/her movements and speech, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when on 04/08/24, Nurse #1 spoke to Resident #1 in a degrading, insulting manner and slammed a door in his/her face. Findings include: Review of the Facility Resident Rights Policy, undated, indicated that employees shall treat residents with kindness, respect and dignity. Review of Resident #1's medical record indicated he/she was admitted to the Facility during November 2023 and his/her diagnosis included depression and Parkinson's disease (brain disease in which nerve cells, or neurons, in the brain die or become impaired, damage is progressive over time, and affects areas in the brain that control movement, speech and causes tremors). Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of two sampled Employee Files, the Facility failed to ensure staff implemented and followed their Abuse Policy when a Massachusetts Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) check was not conducted on Nurse #2 prior to his date of employment at the Facility as required, and in accordance with the Facility's Abuse Policy. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled Abuse, dated as revised 03/2023, indicated the following: -all potential employees will be thoroughly screened for any history of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of residents, and -the Facility will not employ anyone with disciplinary action in effect against license, or guilty of abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation. The Policy also indicated that screening shall include, but is not limited to: -at least one favorable reference from a previous or current employer, -checking and verifying licenses, -checking and verifying CNA registry (this includes all departments), -checking OIG listing, and -checking the state sex offender registry. Review of Nurse #2's Employee File…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being at high risk for the potential for skin breakdown, the Facility failed to ensure nursing developed and implemented an individualized comprehensive care plan with interventions, treatment goals and outcomes that addressed his/her risk for skin breakdown, and Resident #1 developed actual alteration in his/her skin integrity to both his/her heels. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy, titled Care Plans - Comprehensive, dated as revised July 2023, indicated the following: -an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident; -the comprehensive care plan will incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems and reflect treatment goals, timetables and objectives in measurable outcomes; - identify the professional services that are responsible for each element of care; -reflect currently recognized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was assessed by nursing as being at high risk for the potential for skin breakdown, and subsequently developed a pressure injury to his/her right heel, the Facility failed to ensure care and treatment to the pressure injury was consistently monitored, assessed and documented by nursing to determine if the area was improving or to prevent worsening of the area. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Pressure Ulcer/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol, undated, indicated the following: - nursing staff will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure ulcers; - nurse shall describe and document/report the full assessment of pressure sore, including location, stage, length, width, depth, presence of exudates or necrotic tissue, pain assessment, current treatments, including support surfaces; - the physician will order pertinent wound treatments, including pressure reduction surfaces, wound cleansing and debridement approaches, dressings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-30 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and records reviewed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was discharged home from the facility less than 24 hours after being admitted , the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1's discharge was safe, orderly, and that the medications provided to him/her upon discharge were accurately reconciled by nursing, when upon his/her discharge on e of the medications sent home with Resident #1 belonged to another facility resident, was not a medication Resident #1 was prescribed by his/her physician, and therefore placed him/her at increased risk for the potential for adverse side effects in the event he/she consumed the medication. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Discharge Medications, dated as last revised March 2022, indicated the following: -medications shall be sent with the resident upon discharge; -the charge nurse shall verify that the medications are labeled consistent with current physician orders including instructions for use; -the nurse will reconcile pre-discharge medications with the resident's post-discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to maintain an active antibiotic stewardship program to monitor residents receiving antibiotic medications. Findings include: During an interview on 2/21/23 at 7:45 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said she is also the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP). During an interview on 2/21/23 at 12:06 P.M., the DON provided the surveyors with a binder of infection control (IC) documents, and said she believed they were the policies and protocols the facility was to use to guide IC practices. Review of the IC Binder failed to indicate that it contained any antibiotic stewardship information, policy, procedure, or plan. During an interview on 2/22/23 at 10:10 A.M., Regional Nurse #1 said policies could not be retrieved by the DON yesterday because of a technology issue and provided the surveyor with print outs of IC policies, including an antibiotic stewardship program for review. Additional documents of McGeer criteria surveillance (standard definitions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-23 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — widespread
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to inform residents, families, and resident representatives of a confirmed COVID-19 infection by 5:00 P.M. the next calendar day. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled COVID-19, dated as revised 12/2022, indicated but was not limited to the following under section 29, COVID-19 reporting: - center must inform patients, their representatives, and families of those residing in the center by 5:00 P.M. the next calendar day following the occurrence of a single confirmed infection of COVID-19. During an interview on 2/21/23 at 8:38 A.M., the Administrator said he was responsible for notifying all residents, their representatives and family members about COVID-19 cases in the facility and does so through a letter sent by either mail or e-mail. Review of the facility's Staff Testing Logs and Staff COVID-19 Line Listings indicated the following: - on 1/12/23 Staff #4 tested positive for COVID-19 - on 1/28/23 Staff #6 tested positive for COVID-19 - on 1/30/23 Rehab Staff #1 and Staff #5 tested positive for COVID-19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-23 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff conducted COVID-19 self-testing in a manner that was consistent with current standards of practice set forth by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and manufacturer's guidelines during a COVID-19 outbreak in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure COVID-19 Indicaid tests were being fully developed for proper results; 2. Ensure staff COVID-19 test results are monitored and logged to maintain an accurate record of staff testing; and 3. Ensure staff are completing testing prior to reporting to their assigned work area for the day. Findings include: 1. Review of the Indicaid Rapid Antigen COVID-19 test kit insert, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Do not read test results before 20 minutes or after 25 minutes - Look for lines next to the C (control) and T (test) areas on the test device - If a control line and a test line is visible the test is positive - If a control line is visible and a test line is not visible the test is negative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-23 · tag F0888 — widespread
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy review, and document review, the facility failed to develop and implement their COVID-19 vaccination exemption policy for medical exemptions that were inclusive of all regulatory requirements and documents for one of two exempt employees reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Employee HCP COVID-19 vaccination, dated as revised 10/2022, included but was not limited to: Staff Vaccination Exemptions: - facility staff may request exemptions; all exemptions will be kept on site for easy access - the exemption form will be used to record the facility determination of the exemption - the exemption form will record the facilities accommodations for the staff member Medical Exemptions: Facility staff may request a medical exemption under the following provisions: - medical exemption documentation must specify which authorized or licensed COVID-19 vaccine is clinically contraindicated for the staff member and the recognized clinical reason for contraindication - the document must include a statement recommending the staff member be exempt…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-23 · tag F0942 — widespread
    Ensure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure three out of four facility staff (Staff #8, #9, and #10) reviewed were educated on the rights of the residents as well as the responsibilities of the facility to properly care for its residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Orientation Program for Newly Hired Employees, Transfers, Volunteers, and Agency, undated, indicated but is not limited to the following: -An orientation program shall be conducted for all newly hired employees, transfers from other departments, and volunteers -All newly hired personnel must attend an orientation program their first few days of employment -A written record will be maintained of each employee's individual orientation program -Orientation records shall include the date reviewed, employee's initials, subject matter reviewed, and other information deemed necessary or appropriate -Records of orientation shall be filed in the employee's personnel file upon completion of the orientation program Our orientation program includes but is not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-23 · tag F0943 — widespread
    Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to provide annual abuse training for their staff, as required. Specifically, the facility failed to provide in-servicing that included resident abuse prohibition training. Findings include: Review of the of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition, last reviewed April 2021, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Purpose: To ensure that employees receive training at orientation and through on-going sessions on issues related to abuse prohibition practices. -Policy: Staff will understand and be familiar with the policies and procedures related to abuse prohibition and must attend in-service education related to abuse prohibition at least annually. -Procedure: Facility staff will receive in-service training at least annually on abuse prohibition. During an interview on 2/22/23 at 12:00 P.M., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said that she is also the Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) and is responsible for the in-servicing of staff. She said that she has not had an opportunity to locate any previous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-23 · tag F0944 — widespread
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure, as part of its quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program, that mandatory training that outlined and informed staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program was conducted. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI), revised June 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The administrator ensures that consistent, appropriate and just-in-time training is provided to facility employees. Quality topics are covered at general orientation and with on-going training. -Allocation of resources for quality activities such as time, equipment, and technical training are provided as needed by the administrator in conjunction with Department feedback. -Administrator is responsible to ensure ongoing orientation, education, and training on QAPI updates is communicated to staff. In addition, staff are expected to answer questions regarding performance improvement and how QAPI is used in operations of the facility. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-02-23 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespread
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review and interview, the facility failed to implement and permanently maintain an effective training program for all staff, which included, training on standards, policies, and procedures for the facility's infection prevention and control program. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Outbreak Investigation Control Strategies and Prevention Guidelines, dated as revised 5/2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: - the Infection Preventionist (IP) will provide staff education about the causative organisms, outbreak control measures and the responsibilities of certified nurse assistants, charge nurses, nursing supervisors, and leadership. Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control Guidelines for All Nursing Procedures, dated as revised 12/2022, included but was not limited to the following: Prior to having direct-care responsibilities for residents, staff must have appropriate in-service training on general infection and exposure control issues, and on managing infections in residents. Training includes: - facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for three Residents (#34, #45, #14), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #34, to ensure physician's orders were in place for the care and treatment of the Resident's cardiac pacemaker; 2. For Resident #45, to address the presence of and management of the Resident's cardiac pacemaker; and 3. For Resident #14, to ensure the Psychiatric consultant's recommendations that were reviewed and approved by the Physician were implemented. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Care of a Resident with a Pacemaker, revised March 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Pacemakers are electronic devices that artificially stimulate the heart muscle with electrical impulses when the heart rhythm is too slow (bradycardia) Complications: -If the pulse generator or battery fails, or if the leads become displaced the pacemaker may…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review. the facility failed to ensure for five Residents (#14, #22, #33, #19, and #155) that each Resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, in a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #14, resident specific, targeted behaviors were monitored for the use of the psychotropic medications Trazodone (antianxiety) and Zoloft (antidepressant); 2. For Resident #22, resident specific, targeted behaviors were monitored for the use of the psychotropic medication Effexor (antianxiety); 3. For Resident #33, resident specific, targeted behaviors were monitored for the use of the psychotropic medication Gabapentin (anticonvulsant medication used to treat anxiety); 4. For Resident #19, targeted behaviors were being consistently documented and physician's orders in place to monitor for potential side effects to evaluate the effectiveness of the Resident's psychotropic medications; and 5. For Resident #155, an antipsychotic medication ordered as needed (PRN) was limited to 14 days and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals were secured (limited access) and safely stored. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. The Director of Nurses' (DON) office, with medications visible from the office doorway, was locked/secured when she was not present; and 2. The treatment cart on Unit 2 was locked. Findings include: 1. On 2/22/23 at 8:00 A.M., the surveyors walked by the DON's office and observed the following medications on a bookshelf in her office (visible from the doorway): -six boxes of 4% Lidocaine patches (topical medication patch containing Lidocaine used for pain) -18 bottles of over the counter (OTC) pain relief medications (Tylenol and non-Tylenol) -four tubes of A and D ointment (a skin protectant-contains Lanolin, Petrolatum and cod liver oil which contains vitamin A and D) -one bottle of Fluticasone Nasal spray (nasal steroid used to treat symptoms of rhinitis such as sneezing, runny/stuffy nose or itchy nose caused by allergies) -A plastic bag containing numerous syringes filled with normal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen and in the unit kitchenettes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage, undated, indicated the following: -all foods will be held according to manufacturer's guidelines and expiration dates -all foods will be labeled with a use by date when opened -open products such as canned fruit, vegetables, juices should be discarded after 3 days Review of the 2013 Food and Drug Administration Food Code indicated that temperatures should be monitored to ensure proper food holding temperatures. The Food Code is a model for safeguarding public health and ensuring food is safe for consumption. On 2/21/23 at 8:08 A.M., the surveyor observed the following in the main kitchen: A large refrigerator had a bowl of pineapples, covered in plastic wrap dated 1/22 through 1/25; a bowl of chocolate pudding with plastic wrap dated 2/16 and a tray of cucumbers with plastic wrap and the numbers 7120. On 2/22/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure their infection control and prevention program was implemented throughout the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Implement and utilize a system of surveillance for staff, symptomatic or positive for COVID-19, to include return to work criteria; 2. Ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) according to posted signs when entering or working within a COVID-19 positive resident's room; and 3. For Resident #24, ensure staff implemented infection prevention and control practices including donning the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering a COVID-19 positive room. Findings include: 1. Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled Interim Guidance for Managing Healthcare Personnel with SARS-CoV-2 Infection or Exposure to SARS-CoV-2 dated: September 2022, indicated criteria to determine when healthcare personnel (HCP) with SARS-CoV-2 infection could return to work and are influenced by severity of symptoms and presence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-02-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of three refrigerators in the main kitchen and one of two Unit refrigerator/freezers were maintained in good working condition. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For the Unit #3 Resident kitchenette refrigerator, to ensure the refrigerator was functioning properly to maintain refrigerator product at or below 41 degrees, and failed to ensure the replacement refrigerator was working properly; 2. For the main kitchen Walk-In Refrigerator (labeled #3), to maintain the refrigerator unit by evidence of a slow leak of refrigerant coolant and rusted unreadable thermostat dial resulting in the refrigerator not maintaining the temperature at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F); and 3. For the main kitchen Reach-In Refrigerator (labeled #1), to maintain the refrigerator unit by regularly cleaning the condenser unit resulting in the refrigerator not maintaining the temperature at or below 41 degrees F. Findings include: Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident's (#46) representative, as designated by the Resident, was able to make medical decisions for the Resident. The total sample was 17 residents. Findings include: Resident #46 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the medical record included a Health Care Proxy designating Family Member #1 as the primary health care decision maker for Resident #46. The medical record included a Documentation of Resident Incapacity form which indicated Resident #46 was unable to make health care decisions related to advanced age and cognitive decline. During an interview on 2/21/23 at 9:30 A.M., Family Member #2 of Resident #46 said he/she was not the primary health care proxy, that Family Member #1 was the primary health care proxy, but the staff continue to call him/her with any updates. Review of the medical record indicated on 12/15/22 Family Member #2 signed the Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) indicating Resident #46 was not to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident and/or their representative were fully informed in advance and given information necessary to make health care decisions, including the purpose for psychotropic medications as well as the risks and benefits, prior to their use for two Residents (#14 and #33), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #14, informed consent was obtained from the Health Care Proxy (HCP- a designated individual to legally make medical decisions for another when a doctor declares the person incompetent) prior to the administration of the antidepressant medication Trazodone and Depakote (an anticonvulsant used to treat agitation and anxiety) outside of the dose range consented by the HCP; and 2. For Resident #33, informed consent was obtained from the HCP prior to the administration of Gabapentin (an anticonvulsant used to treat agitation and anxiety). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Psychoactive Medication, last revised July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for one Resident (#109), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow their policy for investigating and reporting an allegation of verbal abuse by staff documented in the the Resident's medical record and facility's Grievance Book. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition, last revised April 2021, included but was not limited to the following: -Verbal Abuse: Any use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully include disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within hearing distance, to describe residents, regardless of a resident's age, ability to comprehend or mental and/or physical disability; -Investigation: -The facility will investigate all alleged/potential incidents of resident abuse, including mental abuse, neglect, mistreatment, injuries of unknown etiology, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. -Interviews of appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for one Resident (#109), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the Department of Public Health (DPH) as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition, last revised April 2021, included but was not limited to the following: -Verbal Abuse: Any use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully include disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within hearing distance, to describe residents, regardless of a resident's age, ability to comprehend or mental and/or physical disability; -Reporting Response and Follow-up: Alleged violations and all substantiated incidents will be reported to the state agency immediately but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, and corrective actions will be taken as necessary depending on results of the investigation. Resident #109 was admitted to the facility in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for one Resident (#109), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow their policy for investigating an allegation of verbal abuse documented in the facility's Grievance Book. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition, last revised April 2021, included but was not limited to the following: -Verbal Abuse: Any use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully include disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within hearing distance, to describe residents, regardless of a resident's age, ability to comprehend or mental and/or physical disability; -Investigation: -The facility will investigate all alleged/potential incidents of resident abuse, including mental abuse, neglect, mistreatment, injuries of unknown etiology, exploitation, and misappropriation of property. -Interviews of appropriate individuals-the Nursing Supervisor/Charge Nurse will collect…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission that promoted and managed the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted Standards of Nursing Practice for three residents (#108, #45, and #24), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #108, to develop a baseline care plan for pain management; 2. For Resident #45, to develop a baseline care plan for pacemaker care; and 3. For Resident #24, to develop a baseline care plan on admission for COVID-19 diagnosis. Findings include: 1. Resident #108 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with diagnoses including encounter for other orthopedic aftercare and subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing. Review of the Physician's Orders, dated 2/1/23, included the following: -Tramadol (used to treat moderate to severe pain) 50 milligrams (MG) by mouth for pain level of 4-6 -Tramadol 50 MG every 6 hours for pain as needed -Percocet (oxycodone-acetaminophen 5-325 MG); Give one tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were developed and/or implemented for one Resident (#34), out of a total of 17 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized plan of care for a cardiac pacemaker. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans - Comprehensive, revised July 2022, indicated but is not limited to the following: -The resident has the right to refuse to participate in the development of his/her care plan and medical and nursing treatments. When such refusals are made, appropriate documentation will be entered into the resident's clinical records in accordance with established policies Resident #34 was admitted to the facility in March 2022 with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a-fib) (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that occurs occasionally and commonly causes poor blood flow), sick sinus syndrome (type of heart rhythm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one Resident (#22), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated to reflect the discontinuation of pacemaker monitoring. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans-Comprehensive, last revised 7/2022, included but was not limited to: -The Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. When the desired outcome is not met; c. When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. At least quarterly. Resident #22 was admitted to the facility in July 2019 with diagnoses including atrioventricular (AV) block (an interruption or delay of electrical conduction from the atria to the ventricles due to conduction system abnormalities in the AV) and presence of a cardiac pacemaker. On 2/21/23 at 9:20 A.M., the surveyor observed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to arrange for an audiology appointment for one Resident (#31), out of 17 sampled residents, to address the Resident's hearing loss. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Ancillary Physician Services, updated July 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -routine and emergency audiology services are provided to residents through: contract agreement with a licensed audiologist that comes to the facility, referrals to resident's personal audiologist, referral to community audiologist or referral to health care organizations that provide audiologist -selected audiologists will be available to provide follow-up care per resident's request -Social Services will assist with appointments, transportation and reimbursement if eligible -direct care staff will assist with hearing aid care, including removing, cleaning and storage Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in October 2021. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/20/23, indicated for Resident #31 the ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and received adequate supervision to help reduce the risk for falls for two Residents (#19, #37), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #19, a. ensure the Resident's level of assist for ambulation (to walk), toileting, and transfer was accurately reflected in the medical record, b. ensure staff were aware of the Resident's high risk for falls and implemented interventions to reduce the risk for falls, and c. ensure the post fall process was implemented after each fall per facility requirement; and 2. For Resident #37, to ensure staff were aware of the Resident's risk for falls and provide adequate supervision to reduce the risk for falls. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, revised February 2022, indicated but was not limited to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed and evaluated the total program of care for Resident #43, out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, the physician failed to review and evaluate the significant weight loss and stage 4 pressure areas of Resident #43. Findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in October 2022 with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #43 developed an unstageable (due to necrosis) area of the left ischium and was seen by the wound doctor on 12/1/22. On 12/8/22, the wound consultant determined the wound was a stage 4 pressure injury to the left ischium, recommended a wound culture for possible infection and recommended an antibiotic for the wound. On 12/29/22, the order for antibiotic was discontinued. On 12/31/22, a wound culture of the left ischium was obtained and on 1/4/23 the order for an antibiotic was written. Review of the weights for Resident #43 indicated on 11/3/22 the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #43 was seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission. The total sample was 17 residents. Findings include: Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in October 2022. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 included the following physician visits: 10/5/22, 11/9/22, 11/16/22. On 2/22/23 at 11:00 A.M, the surveyor requested documentation for all physician visits for Resident #43. During an interview on 2/23/23 at 3:05 P.M., the Director of Nurses said one additional physician visit for Resident #43 was completed on 1/6/23 and provided the surveyor with a copy of the Progress Note. The Director of Nurses said Resident #43 was last seen in November 2022, so they were seen every 60 days. The surveyor inquired about the visits for every 30 days for the first 90 days of admission and the Director of Nurses said these are the only physician visits available for Resident #43.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff developed and implemented a comprehensive, person-centered care plan to address the dementia care needs of two Residents (#155 and #47) to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, out of a total sample of 17 residents. Specifically, Resident #155 and Resident #47 were observed to be behind a closed day room door exhibiting visual and verbal distress. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dementia-Clinical Protocol, undated, indicated the following: -the interdisciplinary team (IDT) will identify a resident-centered care plan to maximize remaining function and quality of life -nursing assistants will receive initial training in the care of residents with dementia and related behaviors, in-services will be conducted at least annually -the IDT will adjust interventions and the overall plan depending on the individual's responses to those interventions, progression of dementia, development of new acute medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a complete medical record for one Resident (#11), out of a total sample of 15 residents. Specifically, the medical record failed to include a physician evaluation and review for Resident #11 since his/her admission to the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Physician Visits, undated, indicated but was not limited to: -the Attending Physician will visit residents in a timely fashion, consistent with applicable state and federal requirements, and depending on the individual's medical stability, recent and previous medical history, and the presence of medical conditions or problems that cannot be handled readily by phone. - the Attending Physician must perform relevant tasks at the time of each visit, including a review of the resident's total program of care and appropriate documentation. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses which included hypertension, asthma, and hyperlipidemia (abnormally high levels of lipids (fats) in the blood).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-coverage (NOMNC) were issued with the required information for a Resident (#217) out of three applicable residents reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to issue the SNF ABN notice and NOMNC, so the Resident/Resident Representative could decide if they wished to continue receiving skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare, and were aware of the financial responsibility they may have to assume. Findings include: The NOMNC, Form CMS-10123, is given by the facility to all Medicare beneficiaries at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay or when all of Part B therapies are ending. The NOMNC informs the beneficiaries of the right to an expedited review by a Quality Improvement Organization. The SNF ABN, CMS-10055, is only issued if the beneficiary intends to continue services and the SNF believes the services may not be covered under Medicare. It is the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2024-06-13 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to inform 3 out of 3 Residents, or their representatives, of potential liability for payment for non-covered services including estimated cost of services. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medicare Denials-Advance Beneficiary Notice, dated 6/2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The notice must note the care to be provided, the reason Medicare will not pay, and the estimated costs for the services. The Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF/ABN) is a form which provides information to residents and/or their representatives so they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services, they are receiving at the facility that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. Review of the records for three Residents who had been taken off their Medicare Part A benefit indicated the facility failed to provide information to 3 out 3 Residents regarding potential financial liability on the SNF/ABN form. During an interview on 6/11/24 at 12:36 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-02-23 · tag F0642 — pattern
    Ensure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review and interview, the facility failed for one Resident (#41) to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) within the resident assessment instrument (RAI) time guidelines. Findings include: Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 and discharged home with services in September 2022. Review of the medical record indicated a MDS for Resident #41 was started in September of 2022, but not signed by the registered nurse (RN) coordinator as completed. During an interview on 2/22/23 at 11:13 A.M., MDS Nurse#1 said all of the questions are answered in Resident #41's MDS, but it has not been signed by a RN for completion. She said the assessment reference date (ARD) of the MDS was 9/23/22 and it is very late and should have been signed and transmitted back in September of 2022. She said the process is for the MDS nurse to notify the Director of Nurses (DON) once an MDS is complete so it can be signed, but the DON at the time was not the current DON, and it must have been missed. She said she was unaware the MDS was not complete until the surveyor inquired about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$52,702 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $52,702 — penalty dated 2024-03-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AZURE HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 52.0+2.0 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OC JEWISH HOME CENTER HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2022
BRILLANTES, MIGUELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/05/2025
LIEBERMAN, AZRIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
SPECTOR, SAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/15/2025
AZURE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT JH LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
BAKER TILLY US LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2025
CENTRALIZED BUSINESS SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
PC 538 ROBESON HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
PC 538 ROBESON LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
BROYDE, CHAIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$617K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 45%Medicare 15%Other / private 40%

This home reported $617K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$397per resident / day
operating cost
$12,066per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$367per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225317. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next