OC Reading Center LLC
1364 Main Street, Reading, MA 01867 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (781) 942-1210 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $54,360 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-05)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.7% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 5.1% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 1.8% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.4% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.6% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.0% | 19.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 84.6% | 94.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 13.1% | 4.2% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.1% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 29.8% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.7% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.0% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.1% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.50 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.90 | 1.50 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 64 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.5%CMS range 35.3–61.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 8.1–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 30.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.8–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 75.0 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being for one Resident's (#55) with a history of suicidal ideation (SI) and depression, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, Resident #55 was not provided with appropriate behavioral health services following verbalization of SI, and attempted to kill him/herself at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Suicidal Ideation/Risk for Harming Self, dated 10/2016, indicated but is not limited to the following: PURPOSE: To act as a guideline for residents who express/exhibits suicidal ideation or risk to harm self during their stay at the facility in assuring their safety. 2. Care plan initiated and communicated to relevant staff and family member. (sic) Review of the facility policy titled Behavioral Health Services, revised 12/7/21, indicated the following: PURPOSE: To provide our residents with the necessary Behavioral Health Services to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-05 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services for one Resident (#55), with a known history of depression, suicidal ideation, and adjustment difficulty, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop, implement, and update the plan of care, resulting in an attempted suicide after the vocalization of suicidal ideation (SI). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Suicidal Ideation/Risk for Harming Self, dated 10/2016, indicated but is not limited to the following: PURPOSE: To act as a guideline for residents who express/exhibits suicidal ideation or risk to harm self during their stay at the facility in assuring their safety. 2. Care plan initiated and communicated to relevant staff and family member. Review of the facility policy titled Behavioral Health Services, revised 12/7/21, indicated the following: PURPOSE: To provide our residents with the necessary Behavioral Health Services to attain or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person centered care plan and implement the plan of care for two Residents (#55 and #13) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically: 1. for Resident #55, the facility failed to develop a Suicidal Ideation (SI) care plan, after vocalization of suicidal ideation, which resulted in the Resident attempted to commit suicide at the facility and; 2. for Resident #13, the facility failed to develop and implement a plan of care for incontinence. Findings include: The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, undated, indicated the following: - Policy Statement: An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. - Areas of concern that are triggered during the resident assessment are evaluated using specific assessment tools (including Care Area Assessments) before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment, services, interventions to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for one Resident (#4), who was assessed to be at risk for pressure ulcer development, out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #4: a.) the facility failed to implement physician ordered pressure ulcer prevention interventions to offload heels and ensure correct air mattress settings were implemented consistently resulting in new skin breakdown including the re-opening of a previously healed pressure ulcer on the left upper Achilles heel; b.) the facility failed to obtain wound care orders for the newly re-developed pressure ulcer on the left upper Achilles heel; c.) the facility failed to ensure a right heel pressure related deep tissue injury (DTI) was assessed and measured weekly; and d.) the facility failed to ensure the weekly skin assessments were completed and documented. Findings include: Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that Residents were provided with a dignified existence on two of two units. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure that staff members were not using their personal cellphones in Resident areas with Residents present. 2. Ensure that staff members were not speaking a foreign language to each other in front of Residents who do not speak that language.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights, dated and revised January 2025, indicated the following: - All residents will be treated with kindness, respect, and dignity based on established Resident Rights. - Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his/her rights to assure that the resident is always treated with respect, kindness and dignity. 1. The surveyor made the following observations: On 12/29/25 at 2:08 P.M. in the second-floor dining room, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was sitting in the corner of the room using her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored according to manufacturer's guidelines in three of three medication carts observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated as revised August 2025, indicated that medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the suppliers. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications. I. General Guidance 8. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from the pharmacy if a current order exists. II: Temperature 4. Medications requiring refrigeration are kept in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to identify and assess the use of pillows tucked underneath a fitted sheet and on top of the raised edges of the perimeter mattress on both sides of the bed as a potential restraint for one Resident (#42) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Restraint Free Environment, dated as revised March 2025, indicated:-It is the policy of this facility that each resident shall attain and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being in an environment that prohibits the use of physical or chemical restraints for discipline or convenience and limits restraint use to circumstances in which the resident has medical symptoms that warrant the use of such restraints.-Physical Restraint refers to any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material, or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Physical restraints may include, but are not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective baseline person-centered care plan within 48 hours from admission to the facility for one Resident (#76) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, Resident #76 was admitted to the facility due to a fall, Resident #76 sustained a fall four days after admission, and a falls care plan was not developed or implemented until four days after admissionFindings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans - Baseline, dated and revised 2017, indicated the following:- A preliminary plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission.- To assure that the resident's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident's admission. The baseline care plan must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives the necessary care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to:Ensure weekly skin checks were being completed for Resident #2 who has a stage 2 pressure ulcer 2. Ensure assessment of a pressure ulcer was being completed. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown, dated as revised March 2014, indicated:-The nursing staff will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure sores.-The nurse shall describe and document/report the following:a. Full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width, and depth, presence of exudates or necrotic tissue. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in April 2025 with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease (a circulation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for nutrition were implemented for one Resident (#54), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #54, the facility failed to address a significant weight loss in a timely manner resulting in Resident #54 continuing to lose weight resulting in a severe total loss of body weight of 11.97% in approximately 2 months. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, revision date March 2022, indicated Resident's weights are monitored for undesirable or unintended weight loss.Weight AssessmentResidents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team.Weights are recorded in each unit's weight record chart and the individual's medical record.Any weight change of 5% (percent) or more since the last weight assessment is retaken the next day for confirmation. A If the weight is verified, nursing will immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 Resident (#17), out of three applicable residents who require renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps the body remove extra fluids and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure for Resident #17 who had a tunneled femoral hemodialysis line (type of vascular access used for hemodialysis, allowing access to the bloodstream for blood filtration in the thigh area), the facility failed to ensure nursing implemented storage of a clamp at bedside in case of emergency in accordance with the physician's order. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with, dated as revised September 2025, indicated residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care.5. The resident's comprehensive care plan will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records reviewed, for one of four sampled residents (Resident #2), who was alert oriented and able to make his/her needs know, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was treated in a dignified and respectful manner, when it was reported that during an overnight shift (8/20/25 into 8/21/25) that Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #2, while interacting with Resident #2, roughly grabbed him/her by wrist, was rude and disrespectful while providing care and when Resident #2 asked CNA #2 for his name, CNA #2 laughed at him/her and walked out of the room. Findings include:Review of the Facility's policy titled Resident Rights, revised dated January 2025, indicated all residents will be treated with kindness, respect, and dignity based on established Resident Rights. Our facility will make every effort to assist each resident in exercising his/her rights to assure that the residents are always treated with respect, kindness and dignity. Resident #2 was admitted to the Facility in July 2025, diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, colostomy, chronic wounds, anxiety,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was found unresponsive by staff, the Facility failed to ensure that Licensed Nursing Staff had adequate training, and the necessary skill set needed to initiate life saving measures in an effective and efficient manner when responding during an emergency situation.Findings include:The Facility Policy, Emergency Procedure - Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), dated February 2018, indicated the chances of surviving a sudden cardiac arrest may be increased if CPR is initiated immediately upon collapse and early delivery of a shock with a defibrillator plus CPR within 3-5 minutes of collapse can further increase chances of survival.The Policy indicated if an individual is found unresponsive, briefly assess for abnormal or absence of breathing. If sudden cardiac arrest is likely, begin CPR and do the following:-Instruct a staff member to activate the emergency response system (Code).-Instruct a staff member to retrieve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was found unresponsive by staff, and required staff to initiate a Code Blue, the Facility failed to ensure that Licensed Nursing Staff were competent in process of calling and responding in the event of a Code Blue situation.Findings include:According to the Board of Registration in Nursing, 244 CMR9.00: Standards of Conduct, competency is defined as the application of knowledge and the use of affective, cognitive, and psychomotor skills required for the role of a Nurse Licensed by the Board and for the delivery of safe Nursing care in accordance with accepted Standards of Practice.Competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully.Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in [DATE], diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung diseases that block…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, staff education review, and facility assessment review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff were trained and demonstrated the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide the level and types of care and services needed as outlined in the Facility Assessment. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff were trained and demonstrated competency related to wound care. Findings include: According to the Board of Registration in Nursing, 244 CMR 9.00: Standards of Conduct, a competency is defined as the application of knowledge and the use of affective, cognitive, and psychomotor skills required for the role of a nurse licensed by the Board and for the delivery of safe nursing care in accordance with accepted standards of practice. Competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 7/25/24, included but was not limited to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a dignified existence for one Resident (#13) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide requested incontinence care before meals resulting in Resident #13 repeatedly eating breakfast while sitting in a soiled brief, on multiple days of survey, in a room that smelled strongly of feces. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity/Quality of Life, revised 12/6/21, indicated: - Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. - Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity is prohibited. Staff shall promote dignity and assist residents as needed by: promptly responding to the resident's request for toileting assistance. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and heart failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/11/24, indicated Resident #13 was cognitively intact as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant change in the resident's skin condition and obtain wound treatment orders for two Residents (#4 and #269) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically; 1a.) for Resident #4, the facility failed to notify the provider and obtain wound care orders for the newly re-developed pressure ulcer on the left upper Achilles heel; 1b.) for Resident #4, the facility failed to notify the provider and obtain wound care orders for a skin tear on his/her left hand; and 2.) for Resident #269, the facility failed to notify the provider and obtain wound care orders for a skin condition on his/her buttocks. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Skin Body Audit, revised 3/12/13, indicated: - Any significant abnormal findings are reported to the resident's physician. 1.) Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and diabetes. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident's (#31) grievances were addressed, out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow their grievance policy when Resident #31 expressed concern multiple times about the staff behavior of sleeping while on duty. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Grievances/Concerns, revised 12/6/21, indicated: - Residents or their representatives may file a grievance or complaint concerning treatment, medical care, behavior of other residents, or staff members. Employees of the facility will assist residents and their representatives in the grievance/complaint process when such requests are made. - Grievances/concerns may be submitted orally or in writing. The person/staff receiving an oral grievance/concern will fill out the Grievance/Concern Form for submission to leadership. - The grievance/concern investigation will be initiated upon receipt and a written report/resolution will be made available to the Administrator within five (5) days. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow their abuse policy for one Resident (#38) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility did not implement the corrective actions after an abuse investigation was conducted. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition, dated 2/20/23, indicated the following: - Policy: Allegations of abuse will be reported promptly and thoroughly investigated. - The Administrator and Director of Nursing are responsible for investigating and reporting. They are also ultimately responsible for the following as they relate to abuse, neglect, and/or misappropriation of property standards and procedures: - Implementation - Ongoing monitoring - Implementation of corrective actions and measures to prevent recurrence. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses including depression and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/4/24, indicated that Resident #38 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to investigate allegations of neglect for two Residents (1a. discharged Resident #1 and 1b. discharged Resident #2) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, dated as last revised 7/13/22, indicated the following: -Neglect - any failure to provide goods or services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. -Allegations of abuse will be promptly and thoroughly investigated. -The Administrator and Director of Nursing are responsible for investigation and reporting. -The investigation will begin immediately after reporting the actual or suspected incident. -Initiate the investigation using factual data. The investigation should be thorough with witness statements from staff, residents, visitors, and family members who may be interviewable and have information regarding the allegation. -The results of the investigation will be documented. -Conclusion must…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility to ensure that services provided met professional standards for two Residents (#14 and #16), out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1a.) for Resident #14, the facility failed to transcribe and implement a daily wound dressing according to the physician's order for ten days. 1b.) for Resident #14, the facility failed to implement a daily wound dressing according to the physician's order for two days. 2.) for Resident #16, the facility failed to implement physician orders for heel protection booties. Findings include: Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated the following: - Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized prescriber that are received by a variety of methods (i.e., written, verbal/telephone, standing orders/protocols, pre-printed order sets, electronic) in emergent and non-emergent situations. Licensed nurses in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide Activity of Daily Living (ADL) care to three Residents (#44, #14 and #54), by failing to provide weekly showers, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: During resident group meeting on 10/30/24 at 10:03 A.M., 6 of the 10 participating members said the facility does not provide weekly showers and it has been a persistent problem at the facility. Of the six residents, Resident #44, #14 and #6 were very vocal about their desires to have a shower to feel better. 1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility in March 2024 with diagnoses of acute respiratory failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/4/24, indicated Resident #44 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status exam score of 15 out of a possible 15, which indicated he/she was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated Resident #44 was dependent on staff for shower/bathing tasks. During an interview on 10/31/24 at 8:02 A.M., Resident #44 said taking a shower is difficult because of his/her medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services to maintain hearing were implemented for one Resident (29), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement the treatment for ear wax removal timely resulting in a delay in the process of obtaining hearing aids. Findings include: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diagnoses including essential tremor, epilepsy, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #28 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam, indicating he/she as having intact cognition, and has minimal difficulty hearing-difficulty in some environments and does not use a hearing appliance or hearing aid. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 8:51 A.M., Resident #29 said he/she had not seen the audiologist and has been fighting for the past year for hearing aids, and staff say they are working on it. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the plan of care or complete a falls assessment after falls for two Residents (#38 and #27) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, 1. for Resident #38, the facility failed to review and revise the plan of care after multiple falls resulting in a fall with a fracture; and 2. for Resident #27, the facility failed to update the plan of care following a fall with fracture. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Fall Reduction, dated 6/22/22, indicated the following: - The facility will identify residents at risk for falls through the use of a falls assessment tool. - The facility will implement interventions to minimize and/or eliminate contributing factors for falls for residents at risk based on the individual resident's needs. - The facility will provide education on fall prevention to caregivers, residents, and family. - In the event that a fall occurs, the facility will investigate the factors contributing to the fall and develop a plan of action to minimize further falls. 1. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards including ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for one Resident (#31), who required renal dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys stop working), out of 27 total sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate communication with the dialysis facility for Resident #31's dialysis appointments. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with, undated, indicated: - Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and hypotension (low blood pressure). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/24/24, indicated Resident #31 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to review and address pharmacy recommendations for one Resident (#38) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #38 was admitted in August 2022 with diagnoses including depression and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/4/24, indicated that Resident #38 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the MDS indicated Resident #38 required substantial to maximal assist with transfers. Review of the pharmacist note, dated 9/4/24, indicated the following: - MD (physician) REC (recommendation): Please evaluated [sic] continued need and add stop dated to Enoxaparin - Nursing REC: Atorvastatin order says at bedtime, please change to bedtime (now 1700) Review of the pharmacist note, dated 10/3/24, indicated the following: -MD REC: Please evaluated [sic] continued need and add stop dated to Enoxaparin - Nursing REC: Atorvastatin order says at bedtime, please change to bedtime (now 1700) Review of the physician's orders failed to indicate that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review for one Resident (#9) out of four residents observed, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5%. One out of three nurses observed made two errors out of 31 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 6.45%. Specifically, Nurse #3 administered the incorrect calcium carbonate without clarifying a missing dosage and administered ferrous sulfate without clarifying a missing dosage. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, revised April 2019, indicated: - Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders. - The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right dosage before giving the medication. Resident #9 was admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes and hypertension. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/13/24, indicated Resident #9 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff stored drugs and biologicals in accordance with State and Federal laws. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in the original, labeled containers. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications, undated, indicated: - All medications dispensed by the pharmacy are stored in the container with the pharmacy label. On 10/30/24 at 12:34 P.M., the surveyor and Nurse #2 observed two uncovered medication cups filled with unlabeled pills in the 2nd floor back hallway medication cart. In one medication cup there were two white pills. In the other medication cup there were two white pills and one blue pill. During an interview on 10/30/24 at 12:36 P.M., Nurse #2 said she had poured the medications a few hours prior but had not given them to the residents because they were unavailable. Nurse #2 said the medication should have been discarded at that time but that she was planning to go back to administer the medication to the residents later. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for three Residents (#14, #6, and #44), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, 1. for Resident #14, the nurses documented a physician's order for his/her bilateral lower extremity wounds as implemented when it was not; 2. for Residents #14, #6 and #44 the facility failed to complete daily documentation; Findings Include: 1. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including diabetes, venous ulcers, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/18/24, indicated Resident #14 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status exam score of 15 out of 15. The MDS further indicated Resident required substantial assistance for bathing/showering tasks. Review of Resident #14's physician's order, initiated 7/30/24, indicated: - Cleanse BLE (bilateral lower extremities) with Ns (normal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) plan related to resident's concerns of not receiving showers. Findings include: Review of the Resident Council minutes, dated 6/26/24, indicated that Residents in attendance stated showers were not happening in the facility. Review of the Resident Council minutes, dated 9/25/24, indicated that Residents in attendance stated showers were not happening as scheduled. During the Resident Group meeting on 10/30/24 at 10:03 A.M., 7 out of 12 participants said they haven't had a shower in a long time and do not feel clean. During an interview on 11/1/24 at 9:35 A.M., the Director of Nursing said if something is becoming an increased issue of concern or has been brought up multiple times by the residents, then the issue will be brought to QAPI. The Director of Nursing said the Activities Director, who runs the resident council meetings, has not been providing her with the minutes so she was unaware that there was an issue with showers not being received. The Director…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to implement the infection prevention and control program. Specifically, 1.) the facility failed to ensure a nurse performed appropriate hand hygiene after removing gloves during wound care; and 2.) the facility failed to ensure a nurse performed appropriate hand hygiene after contact with body fluids during tracheotomy (a surgically created opening in the neck that provides an alternative airway for breathing) care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene, revised 2/22/22, indicated: - Perform hand hygiene before putting on gloves and immediately after removing gloves. - Use an alcohol-based hand rub after contact with blood, body fluids or contaminated surfaces. 1.) On 10/31/24 at 12:49 P.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #1 perform wound care. Nurse #1 wore gloves to remove a soiled dressing from a resident's lower leg and cleansed the wound. Nurse #1 removed her gloves and put on new gloves without performing hand hygiene. Nurse #1 applied a new dressing to the lower leg wound. Nurse #1 removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-11 · tag F0559 — patternHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews, for 21 of 21 sampled Residents who were alert, orient, and able to communicate with staff, (Resident's #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, and #21) the Facility failed to ensure they were issued and provided with a written notice of a room change and/or the receipt of a new roommate prior to making the changes. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Resident Room Change Policy, revised on 12/06/21, indicated when a resident bed change is occurring, the resident being moved will be informed of the move verbally and in writing and the receiving resident will also be informed verbally and in writing of the pending admission of the resident by the Social Worker or designee. The Policy indicated when the resident receives a roommate as a new admission to the facility the resident receiving the roommate will be informed in writing by the Social Worker or designee. Review of the Facility's Daily Census Reports, dated 08/27/24, 08/28/24 and 08/29/24, indicated there were multiple resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications such as topical and treatment items were not stored with oral medications on 3 out of 3 medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications undated included the following: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of supplier. -Orally administered medications are kept separate from externally used medications and treatments such as suppositories, ointments, creams, vaginal products, etc. Eye medications are stored separately per facility policy. On 10/12/23 at 10:01 A.M., the surveyor observed the following on the 3rd floor medication cart: -Clindamycin topical ointment stored with, oral medication pouches and eye drops. On 10/12/23 at 10:18 A.M., the surveyor observed the following on the 2nd floor medication cart: -clotrimazole diproprion topic cream stored with oral medications. -Ammonium lactate lotion, flonase nasal spray, insulin pens/vials and oral medication all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for 1 Resident (#14) out of a sample of 27 Residents. Finding include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Dignity/Quality of Life' with a revision date of 12/6/21 indicated the following: *Residents shall always be treated with dignity and respect. *'Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his/her self-esteem and self-worth. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in November 2016 with diagnoses including dysphagia. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of a possible 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated Resident #14 requires extensive assistance during meals. During an observation on 10/12/13 at 8:11 A.M., Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) #4 was observed assisting the Resident with breakfast. CNA #4 was standing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#18) was assessed for the ability to self-administer medications, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications/Treatments revision date 12/22/21 included the following: Purpose: -To respect the wishes of competent residents to self-administer prescribed medications or treatments, as allowed by Federal Regulations, -To maintain safety and accuracy of medication administration Residents who wish to self-administer medications/treatments will be assessed for ability and allowed to self-administer if deemed capable. Resident #18 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including heart failure, gastro-esophageal reflux disease and chronic kidney disease stage 3. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/16/23, indicated Resident #18 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 10/11/23 at 9:53 A.M., the surveyor observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to obtain psychotropic consents from the legal representative for 1 Resident (#54) out of a sample of 27 Residents. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled 'Psychotropic medication treatment in long term care centers' dated January 2021 indicated the following: *In order to complete the informed consent for psychotropic administration form, the drug's prescriber must discuss the purpose of administering the psychotropic drug, the prescribed dosage, and any known side effects with the resident or the resident's legal representative. A review of the facility policy titled 'Massachusetts Advance Directives' revised August 2022 indicated the following: *Guardian-A person who is appointed by the court to make decisions for an incapacitated person, in a long-term care setting, a guardianship should be pursued if a resident is incapacitated and does not have a health care proxy or DPOA for health on file. Resident #54 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Covid 19 infection for one Resident (#225) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, for Resident #225 the facility failed to implement Covid-19 monitoring until 5 days after admission Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Covid-19 Plan Resident Monitor updated date 5/11/23, included the following: -Residents who test positive for Covid-19 will be assessed every 4 hours. Monitoring will include: -Temperature -Oxygen Saturation -Presence or absence of Covid-19 symptoms. -For residents who are confirmed with Covid-19 monitoring will continue until the resident is no longer in isolation and then will be discontinued. -Resident monitoring will be reflected in each resident clinical record. Resident #225 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 with diagnoses including Covid-19, femur fracture and chronic kidney disease stage 3. Review of Resident #225's medial record indicated the following: - A physician's order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to 1) address and implement recommendations made by the behavioral health Nurse Practitioner for one Resident (#8) and 2) transcribe wound treatment correctly, as recommended by the wound physician, for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: 1) Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in May 2023 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #8's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4 out of a possible 15, indicating that he/she has severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the Resident's MDS indicates that he/she requires extensive assistance with all activities of daily living and both physical and verbal behaviors have been documented. Review of Resident #8's medical record indicated that he/she saw the Behavioral Health Nurse Practitioner (NP) on August 2, 2023, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living, specifically removing chin hair, for 1 Resident (#9) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #9 was admitted in 05/2018 with diagnoses including heart failure and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #9 scored a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS indicated that Resident #9 extensive assist with personal hygiene. During an observation on 10/11/23 at 8:15 A.M., Resident #9 had long chin hair. Resident #9 said that he/she wanted it removed and that the certified nursing aides (CNA's) were responsible for removing his/her chin hair. During an observation on 10/12/23 at 10:50 A.M., Resident #9 had long chin hair. Resident #9 said that he/she wanted it removed and that the certified nursing aides (CNA's) were responsible for removing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to 1. document a bruise on a skin check and complete a skin incident report for 1 Resident (#47) and 2. failed to review and implement hospice recommendations for 1 Resident (#53) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #47 was admitted in 03/2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #47 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS indicated that Resident #47 requires extensive assist with all activities of daily living and is independent for eating. During an observation on 10/11/23 at 9:34 A.M., Resident #47 had noticeable purple bruising on the top of his/her right hand. Resident #47 said that he/she has had the bruising and is obtaining it from either the grab bar in the bathroom or the transportation bus. Review of the skin check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement recommendations made by the eye doctor for 1 Resident (#63) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Vision and Hearing dated 12/21/21 indicate the following: *Purpose: To ensure residents are assessed and treated for visual and hearing impairments. Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, muscle weakness and urinary tract infection. Review of Resident #63's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 out of a possible 15 indicating that he/she has moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident requires extensive assistance with all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #63's examination results from the eye doctor dated 4/19/23 indicated the following: *Complaint of occasional dryness/irritation, here for initial exam *Plan: New Medication Order: Artificial Tears Solution,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to follow a wound physician's recommendations for prevention of a pressure ulcer for one Resident (#10) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled 'Pressure Ulcer Prevention' last revised December 2022, indicated the following but not limited to: Policy: *The facility will implement interventions to minimize and/ or eliminate contributing factors for pressure ulcer development on patients/residents at risk. *Use pillows or specialty devices and support surfaces to float or off-load heels. Resident #10 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including acute osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot (bone infection). Review of Resident #10's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of possible 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS further indicated the Resident required extensive assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a fall risk assessment before and after a fall, according to facility policy, for 1 Resident (#53) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #53 was admitted in 06/2023 with diagnoses including dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #53 is severely cognitively impaired and could not participate in the Brief Interview for Mental Status. Review of the last physical therapy Discharge summary, dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #53 is dependent for all activities of daily living. Review of the facility policy titled Fall Reduction, dated 4/20/12, indicated the following: - Upon admission, readmission, quarterly, annually and with a change in condition and or after a fall has occurred, residents will be evaluated for risk of potential falls by completing a Fall Risk Assessment. Review of the care plan indicated the following: * I am at risk for falls related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to identify and address a significant weight change and provide weekly weights as ordered for one Resident (#63) out of a total sample of 27 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Weight Monitoring dated 12/22/21 indicated the following: *Purpose: To ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameter of nutritional status. *Policy: The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss/gain for our residents. *Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken within 24 hours for confirmation. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the Dietitian, Physician and he resident/responsible party. *The Dietitian will review the Weights monthly to follow individual weight trends over time. Negative trends will be evaluated by the treatment team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. The plan of care will be updated as needed. *The threshold for significant unplanned and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to 1. follow physician's orders for oxygen management for 1 Resident (#9) and 2. failed to obtain an order for oxygen for 1 Resident (#58), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration Policy and Procedure, dated 12/6/22, indicated the following: - Orders should specify the oxygen equipment and flow rate or concentration required as routine or PRN (as needed). - Procedure: * Check the physician order. If it is unclear, clarification must be obtained. 1. Resident #9 was admitted in 05/2018 with diagnoses including heart failure and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #9 scored a 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS indicated that Resident #9 extensive assist with personal hygiene. During an observation on 10/11/23 at 10:15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide behavioral services in a timely manner to 1 Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Facility policy titled, Behavioral Health Services, revision date 12/6/21 included the following: -To provide our residents with the necessary Behavior Health Services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. -The facility will ensure that a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma receives appropriate treatment. -The facility will initiate referrals to a psychiatric service, having the resident or responsible party signed consent, as behavioral health concerns are identified. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with diagnoses including traumatic brain injury, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/18/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed ensure that PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days, and that the physician evaluated the appropriateness to extend the use and document the rationale and the duration for the PRN medication for one Resident (#51) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility in June 2020 with diagnoses including polyneuropathy, unspecified psychosis, and dementia. Review of Resident #51's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment indicated that the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4 out of a possible 15 indicating that he/she has severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS indicated that the Resident requires extensive assistance with all activities of daily living. Review of Resident #51's physician's orders indicated the following: *Trazodone HCl (an anti-depressant psychotropic medication) Oral Tablet 50 MG (milligrams) Give 50 mg by mouth every 8 hours as needed for antianxiety re-evaluate 7/1/23 Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent. Two out of three nurses observed made five errors in 31 opportunities on two of three units resulting in a medication error rate of 16.13%. These errors impacted two Residents (#42 and #35), out of 4 residents observed. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled ' Medication Administration-General Guideline' dated 10/1/2019 indicated the following but not limited to: Policy: Medications are administered and prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Procedures: *Five rights- Right resident, right drug, right dose, right route and right time, are applied for each medication being administered. 1.During a medication pass on 10/12/23 at 8:29 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #6 prepare and administer the following medications to Resident #42: *Dairy tablet one tablet by mouth *B Complex with B12 one tablet by mouth *Vitamin D3 400 units…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow a fluid restriction for a 1 Resident (#47) out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Resident #47 was admitted in 03/2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #47 scored a 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. Review of the MDS indicated that Resident #47 requires extensive assist with all activities of daily living and is independent for eating. Review of the facility policy titled Therapeutic Diet Orders, dated 6/15/20, indicated the following: - Therapeutic diets will be based on the individual needs of the resident and must be prescribed by the attending physician or his delegate of a registered or licensed dietitian to the extent allowed by State law. - All therapeutic diet orders will be documented in the resident's medical record and communicated to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2023-10-13 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform 2 out of 3 Residents, or their representatives of potential liability for payment for non-covered services including estimated cost of services. Findings include: The Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF/ABN) is a form which provides information to Residents and/or their beneficiaries so that they can decide if they wish to continue receiving the skilled services they are receiving at the facility that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. A record review of three Residents who had been taken off their Medicare Part A benefit indicated that the facility failed to provide information to 2 out 3 Residents regarding potential liability on the SNF/ABN form. During an interview with the Administrator on 10/13/23 at 8:00 A.M., he said the ABNs were never provided to the 2 Residents who remained in the facility after being discharged from skilled services. He said the facility is expected to provide the ABN notices with an estimated cost so that the Residents or their representatives can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$54,360 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $54,360 — penalty dated 2024-11-05
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to AZURE HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AREM, CHERYL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 12/29/2025 |
| BROWN, YOSSI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 12/29/2025 |
| HERSKOVITZ, MIRIAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 12/29/2025 |
| YUROWITZ, SAM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 12/29/2025 |
| OC READING PROPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/29/2025 |
| AZURE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT AC LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/16/2026 |
| AZOR, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/02/2026 |
| BROYDE, CHAIM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/29/2025 |
| LEBLANC, KELLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/29/2025 |
| LIEBERMAN, AZRIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/29/2025 |
| MALIK, FAISAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/29/2025 |
| IM FAMILY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/29/2025 |
| JCA CAPITAL ASSOCIATES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/29/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $415K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225431. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.