No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Eliot Center For Health And Rehabilitation

168 West Central Street, Natick, MA 01760 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 114 certified beds · (508) 655-1000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (508) 655-1000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
83 Speen St · (508) 907-6542 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.2 mi
148 W Central St · (508) 653-3303 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
150 W Central St · (508) 655-5540 · Call to confirm hours
Park
West Hill Park · (508) 647-6530 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.5%16.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.7%15.5%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.4%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.9%15.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.0%19.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.9%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%4.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.1%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table27.0%21.4%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.6%1.4%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine59.4%77.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.7%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit20.1%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.211.881.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.101.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.3%CMS range 29.0–54.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 7.6–16.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting52.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.1–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.36
RN hours/ resident / day
1.24
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
40.5%
Total nursing turnover
64.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 99.7 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-14)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had a history of opioid dependency and alcohol use disorder, the facility failed to ensure supportive services to maintain his/her sobriety were offered and available.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy, titled Substance Use Disorder (SUD-a medical condition that is defined by the inability to control the use of a particular substance(s) despite harmful consequences), with a revision date of 11/2025, included the following:-The purpose of this policy is to identify residents prior to admission and discharge processes as they relate to substance use disorder. To identify all appropriate diagnoses or specific services needed as they relate to the substance abuse/use on addiction and to determine risk for relapse and the level of supervision needed.-Social Services will work on setting up support groups in collaboration with the Activities department to provide adequate support to the residents, as allowed by the resident.-Social Services staff will work on setting up other more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure they maintained complete, accurate, and accessible medical records, when his/her psychiatric service progress notes were not readily accessible and not included in his/her medical record.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy, titled Charting and Documentation, with a revision date of 07/2023, included the following:-All services provided to the resident, progress towards the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record.-The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record:*Treatments or services performed.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in April 2026 diagnoses included opioid dependence, alcohol abuse, hepatic encephalopathy (occurs when the liver cannot adequately filter toxins, particularly ammonia, from the blood, allowing them to reach the brain and disrupt its function), and alcoholic cirrhosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who resided on a secured unit, had a guardianship in place, and whose care plan indicated he/she was to remain within the Facility unless supervised, the Facility failed to ensure they provided an adequate level of staff supervision to maintain his/her safety and prevent an incident of elopement.Findings include:The Facility Policy, titled Elopement of a Resident, last revised July 2025, indicated that if a resident was identified as at risk for wandering, elopement, or other safety concerns, the resident's care plan would include strategies and interventions to maintain his/her safety.Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in November 2023, diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbances, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder.Review of Resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 01/14/26, indicated he/she had a Guardian, ambulated independently, and required physical assistance with Activities of Daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to issue the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN - notice issued to beneficiaries so they may decide if they wish to continue receiving skilled services that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility), and a paper copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC - notice issued to beneficiaries before the end of Medicare covered Part A skilled services) for two Residents (#33 and #78) of three applicable residents reviewed for beneficiary notices, out of a total sample of 20 residents.Specifically, the facility failed to:For Resident #33, issue a SNF ABN as required, to the Resident's activated Health Care Proxy (HCP - the person elected to make healthcare decisions for you if you cannot do so for yourself) when the effective date of coverage for skilled services was ending, and provide evidence that a paper copy of the NOMNC was issued to the Resident's activated HCP as required,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of group activities designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychological well-being of residents on two Units (3 and 4) out of three units.Finding include: Review of the Activities Calendar posted on the bulletin board indicated the following activities were scheduled on 4/9/26:-9:00 A.M. - Morning Greeting-10:00 A.M. - Coffee Social-10:30 A.M. - Scattergories-11:00 A.M. - Seated Stretch-2:00 P.M. - Balloon Pants Game On 4/9/26 from 10:20 A.M. to 10:58 A.M., on Unit #4, the surveyor observed the following:-The scheduled activity programs (Coffee Social and Scattergories) were not occurring on the unit.-Activity Staff #1 was distributing the Daily Chronicle in resident rooms.-Six Residents were seated in wheelchairs parked against a wall and another resident was wandering in the hallway.-No staff were engaging with the seven residents. During an interview on 4/9/26 at 10:58 A.M., the surveyor observed a resident seated alone in the dining room on Unit 4 holding a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of five percent or greater when one of two nurses observed, made two errors out of 34 opportunities, for a medication error rate total of 5.88%, affecting one Resident (#30) out of three residents observed.Specifically, for Resident #30, the facility failed to: -ensure that a blood pressure reading was obtained per Physician order, prior to administering Amlodipine (medication to treat high blood pressure) medication, putting the Resident at risk for hypotension (extremely low blood pressure) and related complications.-ensure that MiraLAX (medication to treat constipation) medication was administered as ordered, when the medication was not given, by signed off as given by staff, putting the Resident at risk for constipation. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, undated, indicated:-The following is checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications: >vital signs, if necessary.-Medications are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interviews, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards of practice, for one Resident (#14) out of a total sample of 20 residents, and on one Unit (Fourth Floor) out of three units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. ensure that Resident #14's foley catheter drainage bag remained off the floor to prevent contamination putting the Resident at risk for catheter associated infections.2. ensure that ice in an ice chest was distributed to the residents on the Fourth Floor Unit under sanitary conditions.3. ensure the housekeeping staff adhered to appropriate infection control practices when cleaning consecutive rooms which included a room with contact precautions on the Fourth Floor Unit. Findings include:1. Review of the facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, undated, indicated: -Infection Control: be sure the (urinary) catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Resident and/or Resident Representative was provided the right to participate in the care planning process for four Residents (#40, #89, #57 and #22) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #40, #89, #57 and #22, the facility failed to ensure that: -quarterly care plan meetings were conducted as required -the Resident/Resident Representative were invited to participate in the care planning process. -the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) met quarterly in 2024 to review the plan of care as required. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), undated, included the following: -the IDT include but is not limited to: <the resident's attending physician; <registered nurse with responsibility for the resident; <nursing assistant with responsibility for the resident; <a member of the food and nutrition services staff; <the resident or the resident's representative.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-21 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to post the required nurse staffing information daily as required. Specifically, the facility failed to: -post daily nurse staffing information in a prominent place, that was readily accessible to facility residents and visitors. -retain a copy of staffing records for 18 months as required. Findings include: During the facility recertification survey the surveyor observed no daily nursing staff information posted on the following days: -1/13/25 -1/14/25 -1/15/25 During an interview on 1/15/25 at 9:27 A.M., the Administrator said he knew the nurse staffing information should be posted in a prominent area, and he would find out where it was posted. The Administrator failed to provide evidence to the survey team by the survey exit of the nursing staff posting information for 1/13/25, 1/14/25, and 1/15/25. During an interview on 1/16/25 at 1:55 P.M., the [NAME] President (VP) of Operations said he knew staffing should be posted daily in a prominent place. The VP of Operations showed the surveyor the nurse staffing information was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent foodborne illness to residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Discard spoiled food and food that was past the use by date, and label and date prepared food. 2. Distribute and serve food in the main dining room under sanitary conditions. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy and procedure manual Chapter 3: Food Production and Food Safety, undated, indicated: -Refrigerated food storage, all foods should be covered, labeled and dated. All foods will be checked to assure that foods (including leftovers) will be consumed by their safe use by dates or frozen (where applicable) or discarded. -All stock must be rotated with each new order received. -Foods should be dated as it is placed on the shelves if required by state regulations. -Date marking will be visible on all high-risk foods to indicate the date by which ready to eat, temperature-controlled food should be consumed, sold, or discarded. Review of the Live Well…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for one Resident (#7) out of a total sample size of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to maintain the Resident's enteral feeding pump pole in a clean and sanitary manner when the base of the pole stand was visibly soiled with spilled substances. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Care Equipment Processing Between Resident Use and Transport, undated, indicated the following: -The employee will wear appropriate personal protective equipment when handling, cleaning or transporting soiled material. -Enteral feeding poles will be cleaned if visibly soiled and routinely. -Each department will determine accountability within their area. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in February 2017 with diagnoses including Dysphagia and Gastrostomy Status. Review of the Resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts to resolve a grievance for one Resident (#84) out of a total sample size of 19 residents. Specifically, for Resident #84, the facility failed to investigate and resolve a grievance for missing personal property when the Resident's electronic communication tablet that was used to communicate with staff was reported missing. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, Administration: Grievance Policy, revised November 2016, indicated the following: -The facility will support the resident/responsible party to voice grievances/concerns regarding .lost articles or any violation of resident's rights. -Upon receipt of the grievance/concern the facility will take appropriate measures to seek a resolution to the concern. -The Administrator will appoint a Grievance Officer. -The Grievance Officer will be responsible to ensure that all grievances are responded to in a timely manner. -Facility staff is encouraged to attempt to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was coded accurately for one Resident (#79) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that the most recent MDS Assessment was coded accurately relative to dental status for Resident #79. Findings include: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Insomnia, Anxiety, and high cholesterol. Review of the most recent MDS Assessment completed on 11/8/24, indicated that the Resident: -was severely cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 possible points. -had no obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth, no difficulty noted to examine the Resident's teeth. On 1/13/25 at 11:03 A.M., the surveyor observed that Resident #79 had no teeth on the top gum line, and had three teeth on the bottom gum line, two of which were dark in color and broken. On 1/21/25 at 9:23 A.M., the surveyor and the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with personal hygiene care and services for two Residents (#15 and #57) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. Resident #15 was offered and/or provided with grooming assistance for fingernail care and facial hair care when the Resident was dependent on staff for both grooming tasks. 2. Resident #57 was offered and/or provided grooming assistance for fingernail care when the Resident was dependent on staff for this task. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, undated, included: -Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal oral hygiene. -Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with consent of the resident and in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#252) out of a total sample of 19 residents, who required renal dialysis. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that an emergency kit including clamps and pressure dressings were kept with the Resident (#252) and the Resident's bedside as ordered, in the event of a medical emergency related to a tunneled hemodialysis catheter (a plastic tube used for exchanging blood between a patient and a hemodialysis machine). Findings include: Review of the facility policy for End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Care of a Resident with, undated, indicated: -staff caring for residents with ESRD, including residents receiving dialysis care outside the facility, shall be trained in the care and special needs of these residents. -Education and training of staff includes specifically: < .how to recognize and intervene in medical emergencies such as hemorrhages and septic infections; <how to recognize and manage equipment failure or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist during a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) was acted upon as required for one Resident (#20), of five applicable residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to act upon the Consultant Pharmacist recommendation dated 3/18/24, to update the Physician's order for Budesonide (inhaled steroid medication) to instruct the Resident to rinse mouth after use to prevent the development of oral thrush, after it had been approved by the Resident's Physician. Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Consultants, undated, indicated: -our facility uses outside resources to furnish specific services provided by the facility -consultant services may be utilized in the following areas: Pharmacy -consultants provide the Administrator with written, dated, and signed reports of each consultation visit. Such reports contain the consultant's: <recommendations <plans for implementation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that drugs were stored in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for a medication pass process for Resident #20 out of four medication passes observed. Specifically, the facility nursing staff failed to ensure that medications prepared for Resident #20 were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents when Nurse #1 left the prepared medications on the top of the cart, left the cart unattended and unlocked in the hallway outside the Resident's room on multiple occasions, while administering the medications to the Resident in his/her room. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, last revised April 2007, indicated the following: -The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. -The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. -Compartments (including but not limited to drawers .carts and boxes)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-21 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that dental services were provided for one Resident (#79) out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide dental services for Resident #79 after the Resident's Guardian requested dental services. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dental Services, undated, included: -Routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. -Routine and 24-hour emergency dental services are provided to our resident's through a contract agreement with a licensed dentist that comes to the facility. Resident #79 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Insomnia, Anxiety, and high cholesterol. Review of the Resident's Care Plan did not include any problems, goals, or interventions for dental care. Review of the Dental Services Contract indicated that the Resident's Guardian requested dental services on 7/18/24. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control standards to prevent the potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one Resident (#12) who had tested positive for COVID-19, out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically for Resident #12, the facility failed to ensure that staff: -wore the necessary Personal Protective Equipment (PPE: items such as a gown, gloves, mask, eye protection, etc. to prevent transmission of communicable disease) to maintain isolation contact/droplet precautions (used to prevent transmission of a disease spread by touching a contaminated surface or person). -performed hand hygiene procedure after removing gloves as required. Findings include: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility in April 2004 with diagnoses including Paranoid Schizophrenia. Review of the facility policy titled Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, undated, indicated the following: -Contact Precautions <Staff and visitors will wear gloves (clean, non-sterile) when entering the room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that staff maintained a clean and sanitary facility kitchen. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure that: 1) food for resident consumption was stored appropriately to prevent contamination and were labeled and dated. 2) glove use and handwashing were performed to prevent potential contamination of food items. 3) hair restraints were worn to prevent potential physical contamination of food. 4) dishware used for resident meals/functions were clean and free of residue and debris. 5) an issue with the facility dish machine was identified when the minimum temperatures and sanitation requirements were not obtained as required. 6) the three compartment sink was utilized as required to appropriately clean/disinfect dishware/equipment used in resident meal service. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food Safety and Sanitation, undated, indicated all local, state and federal standards and regulations will be followed in order to assure a safe and sanitary food and nutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to ensure provide dignity with resident communal dining on one unit (Fourth Floor Unit), out of a total of three units observed. The facility also failed to ensure that one Resident (#40) out of a total sample of 20 residents, was provided dignity and privacy relative to medical care. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: 1) provide residents on the Fourth Floor Unit dignity during dining when disposable cups were provided during meals, the meals in the communal dining room were served on resident meal trays, and residents who were seated at the same table were not provided their meals at the same time. 2) ensure Resident #40 was afforded dignity and privacy when medical instructions were posted above his/her bed and could be viewed by other residents and visitors from the hallway. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled The Dining Experience, undated, indicated the dining experience will be person-centered with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record and policy reviews, the facility failed to implement the plan of care and/or Physician orders for four Residents (#16, #70, #18 and #60), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure: -the air mattress was set per the Physician's orders for Resident #16 and Resident #70. -interventions per the individualized Falls Care Plan were implemented for Resident #18 and Resident #60. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Support Surface Guidelines, undated, included the following: -air mattress settings are calibrated to accommodate the range closest to the residents weight (for example: if the resident weight is 135 pounds (lbs) and the setting on the air mattress pump is in increments of 20, set the weight between the range of 120 lbs and 140 lbs) 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (MS: autoimmune disorder in which the body attacks itself by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to store medications in a safe, clean, sanitary and secure manner. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: -Secure a medication cart when the cart was left unattended. -Store Fluoxetine (a medication used to treat Depression) and Acidophilus (a medication used to promote digestive health) under refrigeration as directed. -Maintain three bottles of Amantadine (a medication used to treat viruses) solution in a clean and sanitary condition. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, undated, indicated: - Drugs and biologicals used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. -Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications have access to locked medications. -The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. -Medications requiring refrigeration are stored in a refrigerator located in the drug room at the nurses station or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the Pneumococcal Vaccine after obtaining informed consent for three Residents (#73, #60 and #26), out of five applicable residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1) ensure that staff offered the Pneumococcal Vaccine within 30 days of admission to the facility for two Residents (#73 and #60). 2) assess for eligibility and offer the Pneumococcal Vaccination based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for one Resident (#26). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pneumococcal Vaccine Policy, last revised 2001, indicated the following: -Prior to or upon admission, residents are assessed for eligibility to receive the Pneumococcal Vaccine series, and when indicated, are offered the vaccine series within 30 days of admission to the facility, unless medically contraindicated, or the resident has already been vaccinated. -Assessments of Pneumococcal Vaccination status are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. Specifically, the facility staff failed to alert the Director of Maintenance of the presence of fruit flies in the facility's main kitchen, so that appropriate action could be initiated. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Pest Control, undated, indicated if pests are seen in the kitchen, the Director of Food and Nutrition Services or designee shall be informed, describing where the pest(s) were seen and when. Appropriate action will be taken to eliminate any reported pest situation in the department. The policy also included the following: -a pest control contractor will complete preventative treatments at prescheduled appointed times. -if a pest situation is reported, the contractor will be notified and may be requested to make an unscheduled visit to address concerns. -the contractor will document all visits along with actions taken. During an initial kitchen walk through on 11/16/23 at 7:14 A.M., the surveyor observed fruit flies present near…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the state mental health authority promptly after a significant change in the mental condition for two Residents (#50 and #26), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility did not submit a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- an evaluation done to determine if a resident had an intellectual or developmental disability and/or serious mental illness and if a Resident was in need of additional specialized support services at the facility) when: 1) Resident #50 received a new mental health diagnosis indicating a change in status. 2) when a PASRR did not accurately reflect Resident #26's current mental health diagnosis that indicated a change from their prior PASRR assessment. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), effective 4/2018, indicated the following: -The facility will refer .all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related condition for a PASRR review upon a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record and policy review, the facility failed to revise one Resident's (#16) out of a total sample of 20 residents, plan of care relative to limited Range of Motion (ROM) and device use. Specifically, the facility staff failed to notify the Rehabilitation Department when Resident #16 was unable to utilize the splints as recommended by therapy and ordered by the Physician so that the plan of care could be revised. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, revised July 2023, included the following: -assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diagnoses including Multiple Sclerosis (MS: autoimmune disorder in which the body attacks itself by mistake, and resulting in the brain and spinal cord being affected) and contracture of left wrist and left elbow. Review of the Activity of Daily Living (ADL: daily self care activities, like bathing, dressing and eating)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine outside of the body) care consistent with professional standards related to infection control for one Resident (#7) out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, -for Resident #7, the facility failed to maintain/secure the urinary drainage bag away from contaminated surfaces. Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Urinary Catheter Care, undated, indicated: -the purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. -use standard precautions when handling or manipulating the drainage bag. -maintain clean technique when handling or manipulating the catheter, tubing, or drainage bag. -be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility in March 2023 with diagnoses including neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a significant medication error did not occur for one Resident (#10) out of an applicable sample of seven residents, in a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident #10 was not administered Furosemide (a diuretic medication that increases the excretion of water from the body), when there was no Physician order in place to administer Furosemide. Findings include: Review of the eight rights of medication administration, Nursing 2022 Drug Handbook, Wolters Kluwer, page 17, included, but is not limited to: -the right drug -the right patient -the right dose -the right time -the right route -the right reason -the right response -the right documentation Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, undated, indicated the following: -Medications are administered in accordance with Prescriber orders, including any required time frames. -The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right medication, right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff adhered to infection control guidelines to prevent contamination and the spread of infection. Specifically, the facility staff failed to follow proper infection control practices to administer medications in a sanitary manner. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications, undated, indicated: -Staff follow established infection control procedures for the administration of medications, as applicable. On 11/20/23 at 7:46 A.M., during a medication administration pass, the surveyor observed Nurse #2 put a gloved finger into a medication cup that contained resident medications. The surveyor then observed a medication tablet fall out of the medication cup and land on top of the medication cart. Nurse #2 then picked up the tablet from the top of the medication cart and placed it back into the cup containing the Resident's other medications. During an interview at the time, Nurse #2 said that she was a new Nurse and that she did not know what to do when the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-01-21 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- screen to determine if a resident had an intellectual or developmental disability (ID or DD) and/or serious mental illness (SMI) and needed further evaluation) for two Residents (#57 and #58), out of a total sample of 19 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. for Resident #57, accurately complete a Level I PASRR when the Resident's admission PASRR indicated no SMI, and the Resident was admitted to the facility with SMI diagnoses and a recent hospitalization where psychiatric services were provided resulting in a Level II PASRR Evaluation (an evaluation conducted to determine if an individual who screened positive for an SMI or ID/DD requires specialized services) not being completed as required. 2. for Resident #58, the facility failed to accurately complete a Level I PASRR indicating that the Resident had received psychiatric services while hospitalized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for two Residents (#33 and #70), out of a total sample of 20 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. ensure that Hospice services was accurately coded for Resident #33. 2. ensure incontinence was accurately coded for Resident #70. Findings include: 1. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in January 2018, with diagnoses including Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA or stroke: damage to the brain that occurs when there is an interruption in the blood supply), adult Failure To Thrive (FTT: syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition and inactivity), and Dementia with behavioral disturbance (progressive memory decline that also includes changes in personality and behaviors). Review of the Resident's clinical record indicated he/she had a Physician's order dated 3/17/23, for a hospice evaluation and to admit if indicated. Further review of the clinical record indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AZURE HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 51.7+1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AMNH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 03/18/2024
OC ELIOT CENTEROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/28/2023
ANAND, AJAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2023
BONILLA, CARLOS-ANDRESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
LIEBERMAN, AZRIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
AZURE HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT AC LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2023
BAKER TILLY US LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CENTRALIZED BUSINESS SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2023
MED-NET COMPLIANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2023
PC 168 W CENTRAL ST LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
BROYDE, CHAIMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
FRIEDMAN, SAMUELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
MANDEL, ABRAHAMIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
SCHWARCZ, ELLIOTIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$24K
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 5%Other / private 56%

This home reported $24K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$353per resident / day
operating cost
$10,742per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$313per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225516. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next