Lorien Nsg & Rehab Ctr Belair
1909 Emorton Road, Bel Air, MD 21015 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (410) 803-1400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.9% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.2% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.7% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 2.4% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 48.1% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.7% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 12.1% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.1% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.6% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.9% | 80.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.2% | 21.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.4% | 9.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.70 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.44 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
67.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 659 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 47.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 263 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 67.0%CMS range 63.2–70.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.4%CMS range 9.9–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 47.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 39.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 4.2–8.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.30 to 1.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were taken and recorded prior to the serving of food, ensure foods were not left open to air within the walk in refrigerator and freezer, ensure the labeling of foods and follow professional standards for food service safety. This was evident during the surveyor's initial tour of the facility's kitchen and has the potential to impact all residents who eat food from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. On 01/05/2026 at 7:45 AM the surveyor conducted an initial tour of the facility's kitchen. On 01/05/2026 at 7:49 AM the surveyor observed Dietary Aide (DA) #10 assisting with the plating of food on the serving line taking a drink from a personal beverage container which they placed back onto the shelf on the food serving line equipment. Dietary Aide #10 was observed continuing to assist with the plating of food and the surveyor shared the concern with them. After the sharing of the concern by the surveyor, no action was observed to be taken in response to the personal beverage on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to notify the local Ombudsman of the facility's initiated transfers to the hospital. This was evident for 1 (Resident #113) out of 3 closed records reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include:Transfer and discharge: Includes movement of a resident to a bed outside of the certified facility whether that bed is in the same physical plant or not. Transfer and discharge does not refer to movement of a resident to a bed within the same facility. Specifically, transfer refers to the movement of a resident from a bed in one facility to a bed in another facility when the resident expects to return to the original facility. Discharge refers to the movement of a resident from a bed in one certified facility to a bed in another facility or other location in the community, when return to the original facility is not expected.On [DATE] at 11:41AM, during a review of Resident #113's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, medical record reviews, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice by not administering physician-ordered medications at their scheduled times, and failed to ensure the timely administration of medications. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident # 103 and Resident # 107) of 6 residents observed during medication administration observation, and for 1 (Resident #11) out of 2 Residents reviewed for pain during the survey. Findings include: 1.) Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic condition where the body either does not produce enough insulin or doesn't use insulin effectively causing blood sugar levels to rise. A medication administration observation was conducted on 1/8/26 at 10:05 AM for Resident #103. Staff # 9, a registered nurse (RN) reviewed the computer screen as he poured medications for Resident # 103. The computer revealed a highlighted pink screen displaying the resident medication information for Aspirin Enteric Coated (EC) 81 mg tablet scheduled time of 8:00AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to prevent a medication error rate from exceeding above five percent, by administering medications outside of the scheduled time range resulting in a medication error rate of 14.81 percent. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident # 103 and Resident # 107) of 6 residents observed during medication administration observation during the survey.Findings include,Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is a chronic condition where the body either does not produce enough insulin or doesn't use insulin effectively causing blood sugar levels to rise. 1. A medication administration observation was conducted on 1/8/26 at 10:05 AM for Resident #103. Staff # 9, a registered nurse (RN) reviewed the computer screen as he poured medications for Resident # 03. The computer revealed a highlighted pink screen displaying the resident medication information for Aspirin Enteric Coated (EC) 81 mg tablet scheduled time of 8:00AM and medication information for Metformin 1000mg tablet displaying a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with the resident family, review of the medical record and interviews with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that dental services were provided for a resident. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident # 50) of 41 residents reviewed during the survey.The findings include: An interview was conducted with Resident # 50's family member on 1/5/26 at 2:22PM and the family member expressed a concern regarding the resident not being seen by the in-house dental services. The family stated that s/he had made this request at multiple care plan conferences and did not understand why it had not happened. When asked by the surveyor, the last time the resident was seen by the in-house Dentist, the family was unable to answer this. The family went on to say that the resident had bad breath as a result. The family further stated that they brought in mouth wash for the staff to use to rinse the resident mouth and that there was an approximate quarter amount remaining in the bottle. The surveyor observed a quarter of the amount of mouth wash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. This was evident for 3 (Resident #114, Resident #42, and Resident #84) out of 41 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: 1. Hospice care means a comprehensive set of services identified and coordinated by an interdisciplinary group (IDG) to provide for the physical, psychosocial, spiritual, and emotional needs of a terminally ill patient and/or family members, as delineated in a specific patient plan of care. This approach focuses on end-of-life comfort, dignity, and quality of life. On [DATE] at 11:00 AM, a review of Resident #114's electronic medical record revealed a discharge summary physician's note written on [DATE], which stated [he/she] was enrolled in hospice, rapidly declined, and expired on [DATE] at [1:56 PM]. The note also stated, After discussion with family, [he/she] transitioned to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control measures was maintained for a resident's foley catheter bag. This was evident for 1 (#84) out of 1 Resident reviewed for urinary catheters during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: During the surveyor's initial tour of the facility on 01/05/2026 at 8:52 AM the surveyor observed Resident #84's foley catheter bag laying directly on the floor's surface. On 01/05/2026 at 8:53 AM the surveyor conducted a dual observation and shared the concern with Unit Manager, Licensed Practical Nurse (UM, LPN) #15 who observed, acknowledged, and confirmed understanding of the concern. After surveyor intervention, UM, LPN #15 was observed by the surveyor picking Resident #84's foley catheter bag off of the floor's surface and hanging it up off of the floor. Review by the surveyor of the facility's provided urinary catheter care policy on 01/07/2026 at approximately 11:33 AM revealed the following information was present: The drainage bag and tubing should never be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of a facility reported incident, medical record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide needed activities of daily living (ADL) for a resident totally dependent for care (Resident #10). This was evident for 1 of 29 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include:Review of facility reported incident 336885 on 11/14/25 for Resident #10 revealed the facility substantiated Staff #13 failed to provide care for the Resident on 5/23/25 from 3-11 PM.Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in 2017 with a diagnosis to include Multiple Sclerosis.The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers (Resident #1). This is evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers during a complaint survey.The findings include:Review of Resident #1's medical record on 11/13/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On admission the Resident was assessed to have no pressure ulcers.Further review of Resident #1's medical record revealed on 9/21/25 the Resident was assessed to have an open area on his/her left buttock, the provider was notified, treatment was started and a wound consult was ordered.On 9/25/25 the Resident was assessed by the Wound Nurse Practitioner to have a Stage III pressure ulcer to the left buttock and a DTI (deep tissue injury) to the right heel. Further review of the Wound Nurse Practitioner (WNP) notes revealed the WNP ordered for the Resident's right heel cleanse with wound cleanser, skin prep twice daily and offloading foam heel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to: 1) ensure cold holding temperatures were consistently taken, ensure cold holding temperatures are maintained within appropriate ranges, ensure ice cream freezers were free from ice build up, and ensure ice cream was covered, and 2) ensure the required sanitation levels of the facility's dishwashing machine at each mealtime were monitored. This was evident during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: 1) On 5/28/24 at 9:01AM the surveyor conducted an initial tour of the facility's kitchen. On 5/28/24 at 9:05AM the surveyor observed the walk in refrigerator and the temperature documentation which revealed there were no documented temperature readings in the AM or PM for 5/1/24 and 5/2/24, no documented temperature readings for 5/9/24 in the AM, no documented temperature readings for 5/16/24 in the AM, and no documented temperature readings for 5/24/24 in the PM. Additionally, the surveyor observed the following temperatures documented above 41F for the walk-in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 43 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and initiate comprehensive person-centered care plans for residents residing in the facility. This was evident for 4 (# 70, #46, #54, #90) of 42 residents reviewed during a recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized assessment tool that is used to evaluate the health status and functional capabilities of residents, and to help nursing home staff identify health issues. 1) On 6/3/2024 at 11:45 AM, a review of Resident #70's clinical records revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to adjustment disorder with mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood, Unspecified Dementia, unspecified severity, without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure Resident #68 had access to their call bell to call for staff assistance. This was evident for 1 out of 4 residents reviewed for environment. The findings include: During surveyor's initial tour of the facility on 5/28/24 at 10:28AM, Resident #68 was observed to be laying in bed with their call bell on the floor out of reach behind their bed. On 5/28/24 at 10:29AM the surveyor requested a dual observation with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #35 who observed and upon interview, they confirmed the location of the call bell. The surveyor observed LPN #35 pick the call bell off of the floor and give it to Resident #68 and clipped the call bell cord to their bed. On 6/10/24 at 12:35PM the surveyor conducted review of the medical record for Resident #68 which revealed the following information included in the care plan interventions dated 3/5/24: keep call bell in reach and encourage me to use it for assistance and have commonly used articles within reach.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to 1) ensure a second certification of incapacity was obtained, 2) ensure that residents were provided information regarding advanced directives, and 3) obtain Advanced Directives from residents/resident's family. This was evident for 3 (Residents #54, #90, and #112) out of 7 residents reviewed for advanced directives during the recertification survey. The findings include: An advanced directive is a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under the State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the State courts) relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated. 1) On [DATE] at 9:57AM the surveyor observed the Maryland Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form in the paper chart of Resident #90 and noted that under the certification section, it was marked as the resident or authorized decision maker having declined to discuss or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative (RP) in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 1 (#86) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization during a recertification survey. The findings include: In an initial interview with Resident # 86 on 5/28/2024 at 11:14 AM, the resident stated that s/he was sent to the hospital over a week ago for low blood level. When asked if s/he was notified in writing the reason for the transfer, Resident #86 state s/he was told verbally about the reason for the transfer but was not given anything in writing. On 5/30/2024 at 11:45 AM, a review of nurses' progress notes revealed the following documentation dated 4/30/2024 at 23:37 (11:37 PM): Note Text: Resident admitted to UCMC (Upper Chesapeake Medical Center) per [staff name] for symptomatic anemia and GI bleed. Change in condition documentation (SBAR) dated 4/30/2024 at 17:09 (5:09 PM) revealed Resident #86 was transferred to the hospital.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of the bed-hold policy upon transfer of a resident to an acute care facility. This was evident for 2 (#86, #104) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization during a recertification survey. The findings include: The bed-hold policy describes the facility's policy of holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility for therapeutic leave or hospitalization. 1) In an initial interview with Resident # 86 on 5/28/2024 at 11:14 AM, the resident stated that s/he was sent to the hospital over a week ago for low blood level. When asked if s/he was notified in writing the reason for the transfer, Resident #86 stated s/he was told verbally about the reason for the transfer but was not given anything in writing. Resident #86 added that s/he knew they were holding their bed but did not know for how long. On 5/30/2024 at 11:45 AM, a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 (#70) of 42 residents reviewed during a recertification survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. On 6/3/2024 at 11:45 AM, a review of Resident #70's clinical records revealed the resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, unspecified dementia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the resident and staff interviews and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to revise care plans after a resident sustained an injury after a fall. This was evident for one resident (Resident #95) out of 42 residents reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The findings include: Resident #65 has been at the facility for a month to get short-term rehab for a respiratory infection. On 05/29/24 at 11:07 AM, an Interview with a resident (#95) revealed that the resident sustained Fracture after a fall in the facility on 05/16/24. The resident was sent to the Hospital and returned to the facility on 5/26/2024. On 06/06/24 at 10:05 AM Record review revealed that the risk for falls care plan was Initiated on 05/02/2024 with the goal will have no falls through the review period. The resident sustained injury after a fall on 05/16/24, and after returning from the Hospital, the resident's care plan goals and interventions were not revised until 06/05/2024 to provide appropriate care after injury. On 06/04/24 at 08:27 AM, an Interview with Nursing Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to have a resident's hearing aids accessible to the resident. This was evident for 1( Resident #46) of 1 resident reviewed for management of their hearing aids. The findings include: Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized assessment tool that is used to evaluate the health status and functional capabilities of residents, and to help nursing home staff identify health issues. On 05/29/24 at 09:08 AM, Resident #46 was observed having difficulty hearing the surveyor while being interviewed. He/she was also observed not wearing hearing aids on both ears. No hearing aids were seen within the resident's reach or elsewhere in the room. On 05/29/24 at 09:08 AM, Resident #46 stated that his/her hearing aids were in the room somewhere but that he/she was not sure where they were. He/she expressed that he/she likes wearing hearing aids because it helps him/her hear better. He/she added that he/she feels discouraged not hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to: 1) ensure timely and necessary care was provided to a resident, including following medical orders, staff communication regarding resident needs, oversight, assessment and action by staff trained and allowed within the scope of practice for care of resident tube feeding equipment and appropriate documentation of care concerns, and 2) ensure that there were accurate physician orders for resident care. This was evident upon surveyor's review of two facility self reported incidents (MD00205639 & MD00205866) regarding Resident #3, and one resident (Resident #71) of three residents reviewed for rehabilitation services. The findings include: 1.) On 5/28/24 the surveyor began review of two facility self-reported incidents concerning the care of Resident #3. On 6/3/24 at 12:55PM the surveyor conducted a review of the medical record which revealed the following care information for Resident #3 which included the following: turn and reposition every 2 hours and as needed while in bed, turn q2hr and PRN pillows-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents received respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 2 (#44, #86) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the recertification survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Oxygen therapy is a treatment that provides you with extra oxygen to breathe in. It is also called supplemental oxygen. It is only available through a prescription from your health care provider. 1) On 5/28/24 at 10:53 AM Resident #44 was observed in bed with oxygen tubing lying next to the bed. The oxygen tubing was connected to a wall oxygen outlet and was set at 1.5 liters. The connected humidification water bottle was empty and undated, and the oxygen tubing was also undated. When asked, the resident explained that they used oxygen all of the time but must have taken the tubing off sometime during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that pharmacist recommendations were acted upon and documented in the resident's medical record. This was evident for 1 (#2) of 5 residents selected for Unnecessary Medications Review during a recertification/complaint survey. Findings include: Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. Resident #2's medical record was reviewed on 5/31/2024 at 11:37 AM. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Monthly medication regimen review with consultant pharmacist recommendation to physician was not readily found in Resident #2's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to monitor and document residents' needs for the use of PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication. This was evident for 1 (Resident #112) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication during the annual survey. The findings include: Clonazepam is a psychotropic medication used to treat seizures, panic disorder and anxiety. On 5/31/24 at 9:22 AM, a review of Resident #112's medical records revealed that the resident was prescribed Clonazepam routinely for panic disorder 2 times per day, at 4 PM and 8 PM, and was also prescribed a PRN dose that could be given once per day if needed for panic disorder that was not managed with the routinely scheduled doses. Further review of Resident #112's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed that the resident received 5 PRN doses of Clonazepam in May 2024: 5/14/24 at 2:48 PM, 5/18/24 at 12:01AM, 5/19/24 at 1:56 PM, 5/21/24 at 8:36 AM, and 5/26/24 at 1:45 PM. However, there was no documentation of the resident's behavior that described the need for any of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2) During surveyor's record review of the medication administration audit report on 6/3/24 at 12:55PM the surveyor observed the following documentation in the medical record signed off by LPN #31 for the following care for Resident #3: On 5/12/24 at 1:58AM LPN #31 documented the following care occurred at 1:57AM: Assessment of the enteral tube for proper placement prior to each feeding, flush, or medication administration. On 5/12/24 at 1:58AM LPN #31 documented the following care occurred at 1:57AM: Check enteral tube for residual every shift/if 150ml or over, hold feeding for 1 hour and recheck: If residual 100ml or over, notify MD-document amount in ml every shift document amount. On 5/12/24 at 1:58PM LPN #31 signed off on enteral tube water flushes. On 5/12/24 at 2:02AM LPN #31 signed off on every shift monitoring of a pressure relief mattress for proper function. On 5/12/24 at 2:02AM LPN #31 signed off on an assistive device: wedge for repositioning in bed every shift and for pressure relief when in bed every shift. On 5/12/24 at 2:02AM LPN #31 signed off on elevation/floating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to 1) ensure proper hand hygiene while performing dressing changes. This was evident for 2 observed dressing changes for residents #44 and #54 conducted during the infection control facility task investigation. 2) perform handwashing before and after gloving. This was evident for one (Resident #567) of 6 residents reviewed for Infection Prevention and Control. The findings include: A pressure ulcer, also known as a pressure sore or decubitus ulcer, is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. A nephrostomy tube is a thin, flexible catheter that is surgically inserted and drains urine from the kidney into a bag outside the body. 1)On 5/28/24 10:54 AM in an interview with Resident #44, the resident said they had a sore on their backside. On 5/30/24 at 1:14 PM a review of Resident #44's medical records revealed documentation that the resident had multiple pressure ulcers which required daily dressing changes. On 6/03/24 at 10:05 AM an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review it was determined the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect and an investigation of neglect were timely reported. This was evident for 1 (MD00205866) out of 6 facility reported incidents reviewed during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include: On 5/28/24 the surveyor began review of a facility reported incident (MD00205866). On 5/31/24 at approximately 10:27AM the surveyor conducted an interview with the facility Administrator who reported the following information regarding the facility's process for the reporting of allegations of abuse and neglect: Supervisors report to us and we act on and start investigation immediately, we talk to residents, we determine if it is something we need to report, determine if it is a care concern or a customer service issue, or something that looks like it could be abuse or neglect, and investigation along the lines of abuse is reported to OHCQ within 2 hours of us getting notified. On 5/31/24 at 12:41PM the surveyor observed the following documented in the facility's initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint intake review, medical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to document the transfer of a resident in the medical record including the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 1 (#166) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. The Findings include: Resident #166's closed medical record was initially reviewed on 6/5/24, in relation to complaint intake MD00206001. Resident #166 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per the census tab in the electronic health record (EHR) revealed the resident was discharged on 3/7/23. There was not a discharge note to indicate the reason for the discharge, or information of how, or when the resident left the facility. Under the evaluations tab in the EHR was an in Progress discharge instructions document without indication as to who was provided the instructions. The Director of social services (staff #21) was interviewed on 6/5/24 at 1:30 PM. Upon identification of the resident in question she did a custom search of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to allow residents the right to have a dignified existence by failing to answer call lights in a timely manner. This was evident for 3 (#30, #43, and #42) of 41 residents reviewed during the survey. The findings include: 1) A review of the facility reported incident #MD00193246 on 4/4/24 at 10:24 AM revealed Resident #30 had reported an allegation of abuse on 6/9/23 because when s/he put his/her call light staff had not responded. A review of the call light response times included in the investigation filed revealed that the resident had waited 30 - 50 minutes for staff to respond to his/her call light between the dates of 6/1/23 - 6/7/23. A review of Resident #30's medical record on 4/4/24 at 9:00 AM revealed an admission assessment dated 5/2023 that documented the resident was able to use the toilet for urination and bowel movements. The care plan for Activities of Daily Living (ADL - everyday task that people do to care for themselves, such as eating, toileting, bathing, dressing, etc.) initiated at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review of a complaint and a facility reported incident, review of medical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from mental and physical abuse. This was evident during the review of 2 of 23 (#21 and #22) residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Review of the facility reported incident #MD00196006 and related complaint #MD00196058 on 4/3/24 at 10:44 AM revealed a concern regarding GNA staff # 17. According to the incidents, GNA #17 on 8/24/23 Resident #21 reported that s/he used the call bell for assistance to use the bathroom. S/he reported that after a long time GNA #17 came in and threw the call bell at Resident #2. GNA #17 then yelled at Resident #21 not to press the button again. According to the investigation and report Resident #21 reported that s/he was fearful following that incident and would not use the call bell for the remainder of the shift for any assistance. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 on 4/5/24 at 9:00 AM revealed that s/he had mixed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of neglect to determine the root cause and implement a plan of correction. This was evident for 1 (#30) of 23 residents review for abuse. The findings include: On 4/4/24 at 10:24 AM a review of the facility's investigation for facility reported incident # MD00193246 revealed that Resident #30 had reported an allegation of neglect on 6/9/23. The allegation stated that the resident felt neglected because staff do not respond to the call light. A review of the facility's call light audit revealed that during the 7 days that were reviewed the resident had waited 30 - 50 minutes for call light response. However, these extended wait times were during all 3 shifts. Further review of the investigation revealed that facility staff had interviewed each Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) who had been assigned to the resident during the long call light response times. However, they failed to interview the nurses and other GNAs assigned to the unit to determined…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews the facility failed to provide incontinent care for dependent residents. This was true for 2 out of 2 (resident # 6 and resident # 39) residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living for dependent residents. Findings include: 1. A medical record review was conducted on 4/3/24 at 10:49 AM. Medical record revealed on 12/18/21, resident # 6 complained to the social worker about a GNA #21. The resident stated that GNA #21 changed him/her at 4 PM on 12/17/21. At 7 PM, resident called the GNA to change him/her again. GNA stated they would be right back but never showed up again. Resident was finally changed at 3 AM by the nurse staff # 4. On 12/19/21 GNA # 21 was called in to speak with the Administrator about the incident that took place with resident # 6 over the weekend. The nursing home administrator took GNA # 21 off the schedule for neglect and reported GNA #21 to the Board of Nursing. 2.On 4/5/24 at 8:26 AM a review of medical records indicated resident # 39 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical chart review and interviews with the DON (Director of Nursing), the facility failed to ensure residents receive care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers. This was evident for 1(resident #39) out of 1 resident investigated for wounds. Findings include: On [DATE] at 8:26 AM a medical record review was completed for Resident #39, who was admitted to this facility for rehab therapy. When resident # 39 was admitted to the facility there were no wounds on their sacrum according to the admission assessment. On [DATE], a new open area was found on Resident 39's sacrum with a red wound bed; new orders were given for Splurge with Rotifer dressing daily. At the time the wound was discovered, nursing failed to obtain wound measurements for the new area on the sacrum. On [DATE], the wound was described as larger with foul smelling drainage and a dark brown in color. The surrounding area was red. There were still no measurements of the wound recorded. The physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that nursing assistants were competent and had the skill set needed to care for the residents. This was evident for 1 (#) of # nursing assistant staff reviewed. The findings include: On 4/8/24 at 9:48 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) present a review of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) Staff #22's employee file. There was no evidence that the facility had determined the level of competence of Staff #22 to ensure she had the skill set to care for the residents. The DON and NHA reported they would check and report back to the surveyor. On 4/8/24 at 2:30 PM the NHA and DON reported that there was no additional paperwork for Staff #22 other than what had been provided to the surveyor. The Human Resources Director was asked to provide Staff #22's hire date and termination date. On 4/9/24 at 7:15 AM the paperwork was provided and according to the hire letter Staff #22 was hired 10/2022 as a nursing assistant in training as she had not been issued her GNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of complaints, facility reported incidents, interviews, and employee files, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) had the required 1. abuse training and 2. competencies to provide safe and proper care to residents in the facility. This was determined during the review of 1 (GNA #17) of 9 employee files. The findings include: 1. Review of the employee file of staff GNA #17 on 4/4/24 at 12:20 PM revealed that she had not completed her annual abuse training since 2020. The Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator were interviewed on 4/4/24 at 12:25 PM regarding the surveyors' findings of the lack of abuse training. They were not aware that the training was not up to date at that time, additionally, they were newly getting acclimated to the facility and had the employee immediately removed and reported to the board. The employee's file was reviewed secondary to allegations of abuse and neglect on 8/24/23. The Administrator and DON implemented education and inservices to the other employees related to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to clearly identify target symptoms for the administration of psychotropic medications and establish a plan for the ongoing monitoring of those symptoms for Residents (# 9 and #15). This was evident for 2 of 5 residents selected for review of unnecessary medication and 2 of 38 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to clearly identify target symptoms for the administration of psychotropic medications and establish a plan for the ongoing monitoring of those symptoms for Resident #9. Medical record review for Resident #9 revealed on 11/20/18 the physician ordered: Risperdal .25 milligrams (mgs) by mouth every morning for bipolar. On 1/8/19 the physician ordered: Risperdal .5 mg in morning for anxiety. Risperdal is used to treat certain mental/mood disorders. Risperdal belongs to a class of drugs called atypical antipsychotics. It works by helping to restore the balance of certain natural substances in the brain. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-05-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to provide dental services to a resident with a broken tooth for Resident (#26). This was evident for 1 of 2 residents selected for review of dental services and 1 of 38 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Resident #26's medical record was reviewed on 5/13/2019. Medical record review revealed a Change of Condition note dated 1/3/2019 that reads: Resident c/o (complained of) tooth pain, evaluated mouth and found upper left bicuspid tooth broken. No evidence of a subsequent dental evaluation was identifed in continued review of Resident #26's medical record. The Director of Nursing was interviwed on 5/15/2019 at 12:35 PM and confirmed that facility staff had failed to ensure that Resident #26 received dental services after he/she was identified with a broken tooth.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to 1. update a resident's care plans to properly indicate a resident's up to date wishes, and 2. void older MOLST forms located in a resident's active medical record. This was evident for 2 (Resident #31 and #41) of 5 residents reviewed for Advance Directives during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #31's medical record on [DATE] revealed an Advance Directive care plan, dated [DATE], instructing the nursing staff to follow Resident #31's surrogate decision maker's wish that Resident #31 is to be a No CPR, Do Not Resuscitate and Do Not Intubate. Further review of Resident #31's active MOLST form, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #31 surrogate decision maker had decided that Resident #31 is to be a Full Code. 2. Review of Resident #41's medical record on [DATE] revealed 3 different MOLST forms with 3 different dates ([DATE], [DATE], [DATE]) of when each of the MOLST forms went into effect. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide abuse updated training to a Geriatric Nursing Assistant, failed to provide in-service abuse training to all staff and failed to notify the physician and family member of the alleged abuse in a timely manner for Resident #12. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for abuse investigation and 1 of 38 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: Medical record review during the investigation of facility reported incident: MD00133011 revealed Geriatric Nursing Assistant #18 reported to have seen facility staff #19 aggressively push the arm of Resident #12 into his/her lap on 10/30/18 while pushing the resident in the wheelchair. Further investigation revealed facility staff #18 failed to report the alleged allegation of abuse/rough care to the administrative staff until 10/31/18. Facility staff #18 stated he was afraid to report the incident. Once the allegation of abuse/rough care was provided to the administrative staff, GNA #19 was removed from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-15 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a transfer/discharge of a resident along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 2 (Residents #41 and #112) of 38 residents reviewed during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 documented that the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 2/8/19, 4/2/19, and 4/29/19. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or family was notified in writing of the transfer to the emergency department. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/15/19 at 9:00 AM, the DON stated there is no documentation the resident nor the resident's family received notification of Resident #41's transfers to the hospital. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #112 documented that the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 10/6/18. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-15 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident or the resident's responsible party in writing of the facilities bed-hold policy before transferring them to the hospital. This was evident for 2 (Residents #41 and #112) of 38 residents sampled for investigations. The findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #41 documented that the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 2/8/19, 4/2/19, and 4/29/19. An interview with the facility Director of Nursing (DON) on 5/15/19 at 9:00 AM confirmed the facility did not give Resident #41 a copy of the facilities bed hold policy with each of these hospitalizations. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #122 revealed the resident was transferred to an acute care facility on 10/6/18. There was no documentation found in the medical record that the resident or the resident's responsible party was given a copy of the bed hold policy upon transfer to the hospital. On 5/13/19 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-15 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical record and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan for Residents (#211, #23 and #112). This was evident for 3 of 38 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: A care plan is an outline of nursing care showing all the resident's needs and the ways of meeting the needs. It is a dynamic document initiated at admission and subject to continuous reassessment and change by the nursing staff caring for the patient. The care plan typically includes nursing and medical diagnoses, nursing interventions, and outcomes to ensure consistency of care. 1. Medical record review revealed for Resident #211 that he/she was admitted from the hospital on 4/30/19 with a recent fall and multiple fractures of the ribs. Further medical record review revealed the facility staff failed to initiate a care plan to address pain management and non-pharma logical interventions for resident #211. Interview with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to implement comprehensive care plans for Resident #9 to address bladder incontinence and to address pressure ulcer for Resident #112. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review of bladder incontinence and 1 of 3 residents selected for review of pressure ulcer during the survey process and 2 of 38 residents selected for review during the annual survey process. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. Care Area Assessments (CAAs) are part of this process and provide the foundation upon which a resident's individual care plan is formulated. MDS assessments are completed for all residents in certified nursing homes, regardless of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon medical record review and staff interview it was determined that facility staff failed to update a resident's care plan to reflect the resident's need for two caregiver assistance with bed mobility. This was evident for 1 of 38 residents ( Resident #261) reviewed during survey investigation. The findings include: Resident #261's medical record was reviewed on 5/10/2019. This review revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 5/4/2018. The MDS is a complete assessment of the resident that provides the facility information necessary to develop a plan of care, provide the appropriate care and services to the resident and to modify the care plan based on the resident's status. Resident #261's MDS Assessment is coded to reflect that the resident requires extensive assistance and the aid of two persons for bed mobility. Bed mobility refers to how a resident changes position in bed. Resident #261's careplan was reviewed on 5/10/2019. The care plan is a detailed written guide that is customized to address a resident's unique needs. This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to fail to apply Ted stockings for Resident #34 and failed to have two staff participation to reposition Resident #16. This was evident for 2 of 38 residents during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #34 revealed on 3/20/2019 the physician ordered: Teds stockings, knee high apply in AM remove in PM. TEDS stockings lower your chances of getting deep vein thrombosis (DVT), a kind of blood clot, and other circulation problems after surgery. Surveyor observation of resident #34 on 5/9/19 at 1:02 PM and on 5/9/19 at 8:30 AM, revealed the resident sitting in his/her wheelchair in the room; however, the facility staff failed to apply the TEDS stockings. On 5/13/19 at 9:00 AM the Director of Nursing was informed that the facility staff failed to apply Ted stockings as ordered by the physician. 2. The facility nursing staff failed to follow a resident's care plan and obtain enough assistance to prevent a resident from receiving a skin tear during care. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers to (Resident #34). This is evident for 1 of 3 residents selected for review of pressure ulcers and 1 of 38 residents selected for review during the survey process. A pressure ulcer (also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer) is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater), Stage III (full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), and Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone, or tendon). The findings included: Resident #34 was admitted from the hospital on 3/20/19 without any pressure ulcers. Review of Resident #34's medical record revealed a BRADEN scale assessment for predicting pressure sore risk. The Braden Scale is an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of a medical record, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1. obtain enough staff assistance to protect a resident from falling, and 2. provide a resident with supervision to prevent the resident from falling. This was evident for 2 (Resident's #23 and #112) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: 1. In an interview with Resident #23 on 5/9/19 at 9:51 AM, Resident #23 stated a facility GNA (geriatric nursing assistant) dropped me after I was admitted to the facility. A review of Resident #23's ADL care plan revealed that Resident #23 is totally dependent upon staff for all transfers which was updated on 10/1/18. Review of Resident #23's medical record revealed nursing documentation indicating that on 10/18/18 at 10:28 AM, Resident #23 had to be eased to the floor during a transfer. In an interview with staff member #14 on 5/15/19 at 9:15 AM, staff member #14 stated s/he was taking care of Resident #23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to thoroughly assess and intervene when Resident #9 was noted with a decrease in urinary continence. This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review of urinary continence and 1 of 38 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is part of the U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents. This process provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. Categories of MDS (Minimum Data Set) are: Cognitive patterns, Communication and hearing patterns, Vision patterns, Physical functioning and structural problems which includes the assessment of range of motion, Continence, Psychosocial well-being, Mood and behavior patterns, Activity pursuit patterns, Disease diagnosis, Other health conditions, Oral/nutritional status, Oral/dental status, Skin condition, Medication use and Treatments and procedures. At the end of the MDS assessment the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide 1:1 assistance to Resident #213. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents selected of nutrition and 1 of 38 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #213 revealed on 2/16/19 the physician ordered 1:1 assist with all meals. The resident had a diagnosis that included but not limited to dysphagia. Dysphagia is the medical term used to describe difficulty swallowing. Dysphagia includes difficulty starting a swallow and the sensation of food being stuck in the neck or chest. Surveyor observation of Resident # 213 on 5/8/18 at 8:45 AM revealed the resident sitting in his/her wheelchair eating breakfast; however, no staff member in the room to assist or observe the resident. Interview with GNA #11 on 5/14/19 at 8:30 AM revealed that Resident #213 is a set-up only (opening the milk and condiments container) sometimes and that he/she is independent in eating. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 5/14/19 at 10:17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to thoroughly assess the need for pain medication for Residents (#211) and failed to thoroughly document a pre or post assessment of pain while administering pain medication to Resident (#62). This was evident for 2 of 5 residents selected for review of pain during the annual survey and 2 of 38 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: Pain is often regarded as the fifth vital sign regarding healthcare because it is accepted now in healthcare that pain, like other vital signs, is an objective sensation rather than subjective. As a result, nurses are trained and expected to assess pain. A component of pain assessment-focusing on words to describe pain, intensity, location, duration, and aggravating or alleviating factors. It is the expectation the facility staff assess pain prior to and after the administration of pain medication to determine the need of the medication and the effectiveness of the medication. 1. Medical record review for Resident #211 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that medications were properly secured, thoroughly labeled with residents' name, and dated when the medication was open. This was evident for 1 of 4 medication carts and 2 of 3 treatment carts observed during the annual survey process. And the facility nursing staff failed to properly store and secure medications in failing to maintain a treatment cart locked. The findings include: Observation of the medication carts and treatment carts on 5/15/19 at 12:30 PM revealed the following: 1. Humalog pen with no name to determine which resident it was to be administered to and no date to indicate when it was open on Treatment cart #1. Humalog (insulin lispro) is a short-acting type of insulin. Insulin helps to control blood sugar levels in diabetes mellitus. 2. Humalog pen with no date to indicate when it was open and the name of the resident to be administrated to was discharged from the facility. 3. Humalog pen with no date to indicate when it was open. 4. Systane eye drops with no name to determine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-15 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to obtain laboratory blood test as ordered for Resident (#9). This was evident for 1 of 38 residents selected for review of laboratory results in the survey sample. The findings include: Medical record review for Resident #9 revealed on 10/3/19 the physician ordered: CBC, CMP, Vitamin D and Depakote level every 3 months. A complete blood count (CBC) is a test that measures the cells that make up the blood: red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. A complete blood count (CBC) is a blood test used to evaluate overall health and detect a wide range of disorders, including anemia, infection and leukemia. The comprehensive metabolic panel (CMP) is a frequently ordered panel of 14 tests that gives a healthcare provider important information about the current status of a resident's metabolism, including the health of the kidneys and liver, electrolyte and acid/base balance as well as levels of blood glucose and blood proteins. Abnormal results, and especially combinations of abnormal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-15 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain confidential information-HIPAA related to Resident (#312). This was evident for 1 of 38 residents selected for review during the annual survey. The findings include: The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Rule is the first comprehensive Federal protection for the privacy of personal health. The HIPAA Privacy Rule establishes national standards to protect individuals' medical records and other personal health information and applies to health plans, health care clearinghouses, and those health care providers that conduct certain health care transactions electronically. The Rule requires appropriate safeguards to protect the privacy of personal health information and sets limits and conditions on the uses and disclosures that may be made of such information without patient authorization. The Rule also gives patients' rights over their health information, including rights to examine and obtain a copy of their health records, and to request corrections. Protected…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure documentation of the use of a hand roll was recorded completely (#33). This was true for 1 out of the 38 residents reviewed as part of the survey process. The findings include: Resident #33 was observed on 5/9/19 at 11:50 AM to be without a hand roll. A review of the clinical records revealed that on 8/15/18 the primary physician wrote an order to Apply small foam red roll to left hand 4 hours (or as tolerance) everyday. Monitor skin and pain. For contracture mgmt. The resident also has a care plan which instructs staff to place a roll in the left hand. The Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed on 5/13/19 at 12:11 PM. The findings were discussed. The DON returned at 1:24 PM on 5/13/18. She confirmed that the roll is being placed in the resident's hand, but staff are not documenting it.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to promote an environment that decreased the potential of transmission of communicable diseases or infections for Resident (#26). This was evident for observations of dining in the restorative dining room [ROOM NUMBER] out of 10 residents observed for dining and 1 out of 38 residents selected for review of infection control during the survey process. The findings include: Observation of lunch in the restorative dining room on 5/9/19 at 12:20 PM revealed facility staff #3 assisting Resident 26 with his/her lunch. It was noted at that time, the facility staff used bare hands to apply mayonnaise to the sandwich. It was further noted during the observation, facility staff #4, also used bare hand food contact to apply lettuce and tomato to the sandwich and cut it for Resident #26. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 5/15/19 at 1:30 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to promote an environment that decreased the potential for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LORIEN HEALTH SERVICES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLLISON, MICHELE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/17/1998 |
| JURAS, ROSEMARY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/01/2003 |
| LICATA, LINDA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 12/17/1998 |
| MANGIONE, JOANNE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/17/1998 |
| MANGIONE, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 12/17/1998 |
| MANGIONE, LOUIS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 12/17/1998 |
| MANGIONE, NICHOLAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/17/1998 |
| MANGIONE, PETER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/17/1998 |
| MANGIONE, SAMUEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/17/1998 |
| O'KEEFE, FRANCES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 12/17/1998 |
| GRIMMEL, LOUIS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/17/1998 |
| BRANDT, JOHANNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SESAY, ALFRED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| CHARDON-BORRERO, MADAI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/28/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215341. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.