Lorien Taneytown, INC
100 Antrim Blvd, Taneytown, MD 21787 · For profit - Corporation · 63 certified beds · (410) 756-6400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $65,400 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-27)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 23.4% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.2% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 5.1% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 6.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 11.3% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.4% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 56.9% | 22.2% | 16.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.7% | 16.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.7% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 5.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.6% | 25.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.2% | 13.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.2% | 80.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.7% | 21.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.2% | 9.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.21 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.57 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
65.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 323 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 122 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 65.3%CMS range 60.2–70.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.6–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 58.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.6%CMS range 4.8–11.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 63 beds and averages 52.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.40 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.78 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that residents had adequate supervision to prevent falls with serious injury. As a result of this deficient practice Resident #2 died due to the injuries sustained from a fall. This was evident for 1 (#2) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. As a result of these findings, a state of immediate jeopardy (IJ) was declared on 6/20/25 at 4:55 PM and an IJ summary tool was provided to the facility at that time. The facility submitted the first draft of their plan to remove the immediacy on 6/20/25 at 6:40 PM and it was not accepted. The facility submitted a second draft at 7:52 PM, and it was not accepted. The third draft was submitted at 8:02 PM and the facility ' s written plan to remove the immediacy was accepted on 6/20/25 at 8:30 PM with an alleged date of compliance of 6/23/25.The findings include:A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 6/18/25 at 3:22 PM a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-25 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to post the required daily nurse staffing information in a clear and accessible location. This was evident for 31 out of 31 days of staffing records reviewed.The findings include:On 9/22/2025 at 8:40 AM, the Surveyor observed a whiteboard near the central nursing station and asked the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Unit Manager (Nurse #8) who was responsible for writing the information on the board each day. Nurse #8 stated that the charge nurse was responsible. The Surveyor observed the board and noted the following:The facility name was not included.The manager on duty section was left blank.Two nurses were listed, but their full names and titles (Registered Nurse [RN] or LPN) were not indicated.The Certified Medicine Aide (CMA) and Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) were listed by first name only.The board included 7-3 but did not specify hours scheduled versus hours worked.Staffing ratios were listed as 9:53, Licensed, 2:53, and Unlicensed 7:53 without clarification of what…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
During the initial tour of the facility on 09/22/2025, at 9:06 AM, Residents #67 and #17 reported that the facility's food was bland and cold for foods that needed to be warm. An observation of the facility's lunch tray line service was conducted on 9/22/2025 at 12:30 PM. The surveyor requested a test tray at that time. The tray contained Roast beef, steamed vegetables, one dinner roll, margarine, pumpkin pie, vanilla ice cream, cranberry juice, roasted red potatoes, salt, and pepper.Staff #12, the Dietary Director, who was present, took the temperatures of the food items, which showed 137 degrees for the steamed vegetables, 121 degrees for the roasted potatoes, 146 degrees for the Roast beef, 63 degrees for the pumpkin pie, and 61 degrees for the cranberry juice. Staff #12 indicated that the acceptable temperatures should have been 140-165 degrees F for the steamed vegetables, 140-165 degrees F for the roasted potatoes, 40 degrees F or less for the pumpkin pie, and cranberry juice. A review later that day of the facility's policy and procedure on food preparation and service…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include:1) An observation of the facility's Refrigerator #10 with Staff #12, the Dietary Director present, on 9/22/2025 at 8:10 AM showed the following:-Leftover onion ring sauce with a date prepared as 9/19/25 and had no use-by date.-Ranch dressing with a date prepared of 9/20/25 and no use-by date.-Leftover orange sesame dressing with a date prepared as 9/21/25 and no use-by date.-Leftover crab syrup with a date prepared as 9/19/25 and no use-by date-An open carton of liquid whole egg with no open date-A container of raw frozen burgers was placed on the top shelf above salad dressings/sauces to thaw. Staff #12 said the burgers were placed in the refrigerator to thaw; however, they should have been placed on the lower shelf. Staff #12 then moved the fresh burgers to the lower shelf.2) An observation of the facility's Walk-in freezer #3 on 9/22/2025 at 8:15 AM showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was maintained in a safe operating condition, as evidenced by low temperature logs. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who receive meals from the facility's kitchen. The findings include:During a tour of the kitchen on 9/22/2025 at 8:02 AM, staff #12, the Dietary Director, reported to the surveyor that the dishwasher had just broken, so staff had to wash the dishes manually. Later that day, a review of the dishwasher temperature logs from June to August 2025 was done. The form for recording the logs contained the acceptable minimum temperatures for the dishwashing process: wash 140-160 degrees, Rinse 180 degrees or higher. The review also showed that, for the month of June, the recorded final rinse temperatures after breakfast and Lunch were within the range of 100 to 130 degrees for 23 out of 30 days, which were below the minimum final rinse temperatures; and 7 days had no recorded temperatures. July's recorded final rinse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of medical records and interviews, it was determined that facility staff failed to immediately report an allegation of resident abuse. This was evident for 1 ( Resident #69) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse during a survey. Findings include:On 9/23/25 at 3:10 PM, a family member reported concerns about the care Resident #69 was receiving. These concerns included an allegation that a nurse threatened to withhold medication from the resident.On 9/24/25 at 4:02 PM, Resident #69, a resident admitted for rehabilitation and without cognitive decline was interviewed. During the interview, Resident #69 stated that on the first day at the facility, a call bell was activated to request eye drops. Resident #69 reported the nurse responded, You aren't getting nothing tonight. Resident #69 confirmed receiving other medications but not eye drops.Additionally, Resident #69 recalled a separate incident in which a nurse was asked to identify the medications in a medication cup. The nurse reportedly replied, I don't know if they are just your medications, and added, If you don't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse. This was evident for 2 (Residents #17 and #55) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse allegations. In addition, the facility failed to protect a resident during the course of an investigation, which was evident for 1 (Resident #17) of 1 resident reviewed for abuse allegations.The findings include:Resident #17 has a medical history of a stroke, resulting in hemiplegia, a condition that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the body. The resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no or very little cognitive impairment, suggesting intact thinking and memory. On 9/23/25 at 2:30 PM, the Surveyor reviewed records related to a facility-reported event (FRI) indicating that Resident #17 reported to the facility on 6/26/25 at 1:30 PM that two Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) had been rough with them when providing incontinence care. The aides reportedly stated that s/he was the equivalent of two people, referencing their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately recorded. This was evident for 2 (#30 and #70) of 3 residents reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Protection Notification.The findings include:The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a complete assessment of the Resident that provides the facility with the necessary information to develop a plan of care, deliver appropriate care and services to the Resident, and modify the care plan based on the Resident's status. MDS assessments must be accurate to ensure that each Resident receives the care they need.1) Record review on 9/23/2025 at 1:54 PM of the Beneficiary Notification checklist completed and provided by the facility to the survey team showed that Resident #30's Medicare A services in the facility started on 7/31/25 and ended on 9/18/25. However, Resident #30's Discharge MDS, dated [DATE], recorded that Resident #30's Medicare A services ended on 9/19/25.In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive assessment. This was evident for 1 (Resident #26) of 2 residents reviewed for care planning.The findings include:Resident #26 was admitted into the facility in mid-2025.Minimum Data Set- The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions.On 9/24/25 at 11:32 AM, Resident #26's medical record was reviewed and revealed the most recent MDS assessment was conducted for a significant (sig) change with an assessment reference date of 7/22/25. However, there was no documentation to indicate that a care plan meeting took place after the completion of this assessment.The Social Services Director (Staff #9) was interviewed on 9/24/25 at 11:37 AM. During the interview, she reported her role and that she attends the care plan meetings. She indicated that she always documents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain resident records that were complete and accurate. This was evident for 1) one (Resident #4) of five residents review for unnecessary medications, and 2) one (Resident #69) out of five residents reviewed for abuse.The findings include:1). Resident #4 was admitted into the facility in late 2023 with diagnosis that include hypertension. Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is a condition where the force of blood against your blood vessel walls is consistently too high. This constant high pressure makes your heart work harder and can lead to serious health problems like heart attack, stroke, and kidney disease. Doctors measure your blood pressure (BP) as two numbers, written as a fraction, such as 120/80. Systolic (top number) and diastolic (bottom number) On 9/24/25 at 12:13 PM, Resident #4's medication orders were reviewed. The review revealed an order for Hydralazine for hypertension with instructions to hold if the Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) was below 100. Resident #4's electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly obtain a resident's signature on an arbitration agreement. This was evident for 1 (Resident #17) of 3 residents reviewed for arbitration agreements.The findings include:An arbitration agreement is a legal document used in long-term care facilities. It requires that disputes or injuries be resolved through private arbitration instead of through the court system. By signing, a resident waives the right to have a judge or jury decide the case. The arbitrator's decision is usually final and cannot be appealed.On 9/22/25 at 3:05 PM, the Surveyor reviewed Resident #17's arbitration agreement dated 4/25/2025. The document was signed by the resident's spouse and states, in part, that any legal dispute, controversy, or claim.shall be resolved exclusively by binding arbitration.and not by a lawsuit or resort to court processes. It further states, The parties understand and agree that by entering this arbitration agreement they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to follow proper infection control procedures. This was evident for 2 (Resident #25 and #67) of 12 residents reviewed for infection control during the recertification survey.The findings include: 1). Transmission-based precautions (TBP) are a set of practices, designed to reduce the risk of infection by breaking the chain of infection through specific modes of transmission, namely contact, droplet, or airborne transmission. These precautions involve specific measures such as proper patient placement, use of personal protective equipment (PPE), and dedicated patient care equipment to prevent the spread of known or suspected infections. Contact precautions are used for infections that spread by direct or indirect contact with the patient or their environment. This involves wearing gloves and gowns for all patient interactions, single-room placement, and using dedicated or disposable patient equipment. Droplet precautions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-27 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespreadInclude as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a mandatory training course that included the facility's standards, policies, and procedures regarding their Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) program. This was evident during the review of the facility's training program and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 6/26/25 at 11:36 AM the printout for the Infection Control training course that was required for facility staff to review on hire and annually thereafter was conducted. The training was an overview of infection control and failed to include the standards, policies and procedures of the facility IPC program. An interview with the Director of Human Resources (DHR) on 6/24/25 at 2:44 PM revealed the facility had an online training program that was sent from the corporate office for the facility staff to complete on hire and annually thereafter. She reported there were no online training requirements for the contracted staff. The findings were reviewed with the Director of Nursing and Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that they had competent staff on duty to provide care to their residents. This was evident for 1 (#2) of 3 residents reviewed for falls with serious injuries.The findings include:On [DATE] at 6:43 AM a review of the video recording from the facility's surveillance camera at the [NAME] wing nurses' station was conducted. The video was time stamped for [DATE] at 11:36 PM. Resident #2 was observed being pushed in a reclined Geri chair to the nurses' station by GNA #5 (agency staff) and GNA #6 (agency staff). At 11:56 PM GNA #6 left the resident unsupervised in the nurses' station. Then at 12:06 AM on [DATE], Resident #2 was attempting to get out of the chair unassisted and GNA #5 and #6 came back and repositioned the resident in the chair. Both GNAs left the nurses' station and Resident #2 was unsupervised in the reclined Geri chair after the resident was trying to get out of the chair unassisted. Immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop all the required training requirements and have a process in place to ensure that all staff received the required trainings. This was evident for 3 (#7, #9, and #15) of 4 facility staff reviewed training requirements and 2 (#5, #6) of 3 contracted staff reviewed for training requirements. The findings include:1) A review of Staff #7's employee file on 6/23/25 at 1:55 PM revealed she was hired in 2019. She had not received training on the facility specific Compliance and Ethics training, Quality Assurance Performance (QAPI) and Improvement training, and Infection Control and Prevention (ICP) training. 2) A review of Staff #9's employee file on 6/23/25 at 1:28 PM revealed she was employed by the facility in 2024. She had not received training on the facility specific Compliance and Ethics training, Quality Assurance Performance (QAPI) and Improvement training, and Infection Control and Prevention (ICP) training.3) A review of Staff #15's employee file on 6/23/25 at 1:20 PM revealed she had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all staff who worked directly with residents had communication training. This was evident for 1 (#5) out of 3 contracted staff. The findings include:A review of Staff #5's employee file on 6/23/25 at 1:48 PM revealed she was contracted through a staffing agency and started working at the facility in 10/2023. The facility failed to ensure that she had communication training as required.An interview with the Director of Human Resources (DHR) on 6/24/25 at 2:44 PM revealed the facility had no online training requirements for the contracted staff. She reported that the agency that employed them provided the required trainings. She reported that she does not review their training program when they start working at the facility. The findings were reviewed with the Director of Nursing and Nursing Home Administrator on 6/26/25 at 1:43 PM.Cross Reference F940
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-27 · tag F0946 — isolatedProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure that all staff received facility specific compliance and ethics training. This was evident for 2 (#5, #6) of 3 contracted staff reviewed for training requirements. The findings include:1) A review of Staff #5's employee file on 6/23/25 at 1:48 PM revealed she was contracted through a staffing agency and started working at the facility in 10/2023. The facility failed to ensure that she received the mandatory, facility specific compliance and ethics training. 2) The employee file for Staff #6 was reviewed on 6/23/25 at 1:28 PM and this review revealed she was employed by a staffing agency and started working at the facility in 3/2025. The facility failed to ensure that she received the mandatory, facility specific compliance and ethics training.An interview with the Director of Human Resources (DHR) on 6/24/25 at 2:44 PM revealed the facility had no online training requirements for the contracted staff. She reported that she does not review their training list prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview with staff, and medical record review, the facility failed to meet the requirement to provide a system to account for the reconciliation of all controlled medications and ensure that an account of all the controlled drugs was completed with two licensed nurses at the change of each shift. This was evident for 3 of 3 available narcotic count logs. Findings Include: Tour of the unit on 07/14/22 at 1:28 PM to check for compliance of Medication Storage and Labeling revealed the Controlled Drug Count Verification Sheets. Several empty spaces for signatures were observed in the shift to shift verification log noted from March 2022 through the present day July 2022. On 07/14/22 at 2:30 PM, Surveyor requested the schedule for specific days from March to June of 2022 that were noted on the narcotic log where there were missing signatures over multiple shifts to verify if staff worked over multiple shifts in a row. According to the schedules provided to the survey team, no staff worked multiple shifts on the days noted with missing signatures on the log. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility contracted pharmacist failed to identify recommendations were followed up on. This was evident for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Pharmacy reviews are to occur monthly at a minimum to determine any irregularities in a resident drug regimen and report to the physician. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 on 7/12/2022 at 2:04 PM for unnecessary medications, specifically regarding the use of a psychotropic medication, trazadone an antidepressant and sleep aide, revealed a recommendation from the pharmacist completed on 2/26/2022 to change the medication from AM to PM secondary to the risk of falls. The consult was signed by the resident's attending physician # 27 and the change was notated as agreed upon. Further review of Resident #20's medication administration records (MAR) for March through June 2022, revealed Trazadone was ordered and administered with the morning medications. The medication was not ordered to be changed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-07-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) implement pharmacy recommendations that were agreed upon by the physician and ensure that they were followed up on (#20) and 2) ensure that orders for as-needed psychotropic medications were limited to 14 days for residents #25 and #56. This was evident for 3 out of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #20 on 7/12/2022 at 2:04 PM regarding the use of a psychotropic medication, Trazadone an antidepressant and sleep aide, revealed a recommendation from the pharmacist completed on 2/26/2022 to change the medication from AM to PM secondary to the risk of falls. The consult was signed by the resident's attending physician # 27 and the change was notated as agreed upon. Further review of Resident #20's medication administration records (MAR) for March through June 2022, revealed Trazadone was ordered and administered with the morning medications. The medication was not ordered to be changed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and medical record review, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and report to the state agency when a resident eloped from the facility. This was evident during the review of 1 of 4 residents (#20) reviewed for accidents. The findings include: During the tour of the facility on 7/11/2022 and interview with facility staff, Unit manager LPN #3, Surveyor was alerted when staff reported there was an 'incident' regarding a resident that was identified as a wanderer/elopement risk. At 12:53 PM on 7/11/2022 the Surveyor requested from the DON any facility policy on elopement or wandering that the facility followed and any information regarding the alleged incident occurring with Resident #20. Review on 7/12/2022 at 8:38 AM of Resident #20's medical record review revealed diagnoses including dementia and a history of falls. According to the social work admission note completed in March of 2021, s/he was admitted to the Long Term Care (LTC) from the Assisted Living Facility (ALF) in March of 2021 with a wander guard bracelet in place…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews, interviews, and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and implement interventions related to an elopement documented for Resident #20. This was found to be evident for 1 out 7 (Resident #20) residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: A wander guard is a device worn by residents with dangerous wandering behaviors to alert staff with an alarm if the vulnerable resident attempts to elope (leave the facility unsupervised). The device is detected by sensors at alarmed exits or other dangerous areas that cause the system to alarm when the resident approaches or walks past the monitored areas. Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) assessment provides indicators of where residents lie on a spectrum between completely independent and completely dependent. ADLs include but are not limited to bed mobility, transfers, eating, locomotion on and off the unit, and personal hygiene. Periodically (at least quarterly) facilities conduct assessments of residents to track status and identify if the residents have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview of staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen stored and prepared food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: During a tour of the kitchen that took place on 7/11/2022 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor observed ice buildup at the back of the dessert walk-in freezer. The ice was built up around the base of the overhead condenser and had formed a stalactite that came in contact with two containers of ice cream. The temperature of the freezer was appropriate. The Food Service Director (FSD) was present for the tour and stated that she would have the freezer inspected by maintenance. During a follow up tour that took place on 7/12/2022 at 11:49 AM, the surveyor reviewed the July temperature logs with the FSD. These temperatures logs documented the highest cooking temperature obtained by kitchen staff during the preparation of potentially hazardous foods (foods that should reach a certain temperature for a certain length of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-01-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plans. This was evident for 1 (#28) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care and 3 (#50, #2, #38) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings Include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Resident #28 was observed receiving 3.5 liters (L) of oxygen via nasal cannula on 1/16/19 at 6:52 PM, on 1/17/19 at 2:50 PM, and 1/18/19 at 10:10 AM. Resident #28's medical record was reviewed on 1/18/19 along with care plans. A care plan for oxygen therapy was not found. On 1/18/19 at 1:48 PM, Staff #3 confirmed that there was no respiratory care plan. 2) Review of the medical record for Resident #50 on 1/18/19 revealed January 2019 physician's orders for Tramadol 50 mg. twice per day for moderate pain relief, Tylenol 325 mg. (2) every 8 hours when needed for mild pain and Tylenol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the physician of a resident's multiple refusal of a prescribed breathing treatment. This was evident for 1 (#38) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 1/18/19, a review of Resident #38's January 2019 MAR (medication administration record) revealed an order for DuoNeb (Ipratropium and Albuterol) (bronchodilators) solution via nebulizer inhalation (breathing treatment) two times a day for COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (a lung disorder). The MAR revealed documentation that, on 12 of 18 days, Resident #38 refused his/her morning DuoNeb breathing treatment and on 5 of 17 days, the resident refused his/her evening breathing treatment. Continued review of the medical record failed to reveal documentation that the resident's physician had been notified of Resident #38's refusal of his/her prescribed DuoNeb breathing treatments. On 1/18/18 at 2:32 PM, Staff #3 was made aware of this finding.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interview, during facility environmental rounds, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was observed on 1 of 3 nursing units. The findings include: Observation was made, on 1/17/19 at 10:36 AM, in room [ROOM NUMBER] of the heating unit which was loose and appeared to be hanging off the wall. The resident stated, it has been loose since I came here. The wall behind the resident's chair was spackled and was not painted over. Observation was made in room [ROOM NUMBER] of the heating unit on the wall which was loose and the cover was cracked across the entire length. The wood door at the entrance of room [ROOM NUMBER] had a 2-inch chunk of wood missing from the edge of the door, midway up the door. An environmental tour was taken on 1/22/19 at 1:46 PM with the Maintenance Director. The Maintenance Director observed the areas of concern.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to document what preparation and orientation was given to residents to ensure an orderly transfer to an acute care facility. This was evident but not limited to for 2 (#12, #55) of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #12 on 1/17/19 revealed documentation that Resident #12 had unplanned transfers to an acute care facility on 9/6/18, and 9/14/18. Review of nursing progress notes, dated 11/6/18 and 11/14/18, did not include any documentation related to preparation and/or orientation to the resident before transferring the resident to an acute care facility. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 1/18/19 at 10:09 AM. The DON acknowledged the facility staff were not educated on documenting the response and orientation of a resident prior to a facility-initiated transfer to an acute care facility. 2) On 1/22/19, a review of Resident #55's medical record revealed documentation that the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to complete a comprehensive assessment within the regulatory time frame for 1 (#55) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalization. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on these individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. On 1/22/19, review of Resident #55's assessments revealed that an annual comprehensive MDS assessment was completed with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/26/18. The resident's previous annual comprehensive MDS assessment was completed with an ARD of 11/18/17. The annual comprehensive MDS was not completed timely and should have been completed within 366 days. On 1/22/19 at 1:35 PM, during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to review and revise resident care plans. This was evident for 1 (#2) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 (#25) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed a care plan, observation for adverse side effects of medication r/t psychotropic medication with the intervention GDR (gradual dose reduction)- routine bid (2 times per day) Ativan decreased, PRN (when necessary) Valium dc'd. Resident #2's January 2019 physician's orders were reviewed, and the medication Ativan was not listed as a current medication. Physician's orders, dated 11/13/18, documentation that the routine Ativan was discontinued, PRN Ativan was ordered for 14 additional days and then discontinued. The care plan was not updated to reflect the discontinuation of Ativan.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on family interview, observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to 1) apply a physician's ordered brace to the right elbow, 2) failed to accurately document the use of the brace 3) failed to document if the resident received insulin and what the blood glucose level was and 4) failed to follow the care plan for splinting and administering medications. This was evident for 1 (#2) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: An interview was conducted, on 1/17/19 at 9:53 AM, with Resident #2's family member. The family member was asked if Resident #2 had any problems with range of motion or mobility. The family member stated, he/she wears an arm splint, but I haven't seen it lately. Observation was made on 1/17/19 at 10:46 AM of the resident sitting in a wheelchair. There was nothing on either of the resident's arms. Further observations were made at 11:48 AM and 2:18 PM with a second surveyor and the resident was not wearing a brace on either arm. The resident was observed again on 1/18/19 at 9:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility 1) failed to ensure that a resident who was placed on oxygen was monitored for difficulty breathing, failed to develop a resident centered care plan for a resident receiving oxygen, and failed to document the use of oxygen in the resident's medical record and on the Treatment Administration Record. 2) Staff failed to label and date oxygen tubing for a resident. This was evident for 2 (#28, #309) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. The findings include: 1) Resident #28 was observed receiving 3.5 liters (L) of oxygen via nasal cannula on 1/16/19 at 6:52 PM, on 1/17/19 at 2:50 PM and 1/18/19 at 10:10 AM through an oxygen concentrator. The oxygen tubing and the water humidification bottle was not dated and labeled. Resident #28's medical record was reviewed on 1/18/19 along with care plans. A care plan for oxygen therapy was not found. On 1/18/19 at 1:48 PM, Staff #3 confirmed that there was no respiratory care plan. There were no nursing notes related to the resident's use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's medication regimen was free from unnecessary drugs by failing to assure prescribed medications for constipation had a clear indication as to when to give which one. This was evident for 1 (#38) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 1/18/19, a review of Resident #38's January 2019 MAR (medication administration record) revealed an order for Fleet enema per rectum one time daily as needed for constipation, an order for Lactulose 20 gm/30 ml (grams/milliliters) by mouth every 8 hours as need for constipation and an order for Miralax powder 17 gm by mouth once daily as needed for constipation. There was no clear indication in the physician orders as to which medication to give first for constipation. Continued review of the MAR revealed an order for Milk of Magnesia 30 ml two times a day as needed if no BM (bowel movement) in 3 days, and an order for Bisacodyl (Dulcolax) 10 mg (milligram) suppository per rectum at bedtime as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to keep residents free from significant medication errors. This was evident for 1 (#38) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 1/18/19, a review of Resident #38's medical record revealed a 11/28/18 physician order for Amlodipine (Norvasc) 10 mg (milligrams) by mouth every day for hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #38 electronic medical record revealed the order was put in the MAR (medication administration record) with an interval of Sunday, Monday, Wednesday and Friday instead of every day as prescribed. Resident #38's December 2018 MAR documented that the resident received the Amlodipine on 18 of 31 days, and the January 2019 MAR documented that Resident #38 received Amlodipine on 10 of 18 days. On 1/18/19 at 2:32 PM, Staff #3 was made aware of the finding. On 1/22/19 at 11:24 AM, during an interview, Staff #3 stated the problem was mechanical related to how the order was put into the system and confirmed the medication error.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to have accurate medical record documentation as evidenced by nursing staff signing off treatments when they were not done, and not documenting a resident's use of oxygen. This was evident for 2 (#25, #28) of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory and 1 (#2) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: 1) Observation was made of Resident #25 on 1/17/19 at 8:44 AM. The resident was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula at 3.5 liters per minute (L). Additional observations were made on 1/17/19 at 2:45 PM and on 1/18/19 at 10:00 AM, and the resident continued to receive oxygen 3.5 L. Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed the oxygen order was revised on 10/19/18 which stated, oxygen: every shift O2 @ 3L/min continuous via n/c for SOB. A 1/15/19 at 21:08 nursing note documented a change in resident condition in which it was documented the resident received oxygen at 2L/min via nasal cannula. Further review of the medical record revealed the January…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interviews with the facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that effective quality assessment and assurance performance improvement interventions were implemented to address deficiencies from a previous survey. This was evident during review of the Quality Assurance program. The findings include: Review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Program with Staff #7, on 1/22/19 at 2:39 PM, revealed that effective processes were not put in place regarding repeat deficiencies. The development of comprehensive care plans and unnecessary medications (that medications have adequate indications for use) had been cited in the previous survey and were cited again during this annual survey. The facility's action plans did not resolve quality deficiencies identified during the last recertification survey which concluded on 9/14/17, with a plan of correction compliance date of 10/25/17.
- No harm found · B2022-07-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the weekly menus displayed in the corridor outside the nursing unit accurately reflected the menu being served. This practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The findings include: During an observation on 7/11/2022 at 9:30 AM, it was noted that there were two weekly menus placed prominently in the entry hallway of the facility's only nursing unit. The weekly menus were labeled This Week's Menu and Next Week's Menu. The menu under This Week's Menu was noted to be the Week 4 Menu and the menu under Next Week's Menu was the Week 1 Menu. Tour of the unit at that time failed to reveal any other location where the weekly menu was displayed. Based on menus given to the survey team during the entrance conference on 7/11/2022 at 9:45 AM, it was determined that the facility followed a 4 week rotating menu schedule in which the Week 1 menu follows the Week 4 menu. The surveyor observed the nursing unit's lunch service on 7/11/2022 around 12:00 PM. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-01-22 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative in writing of a facility-initiated transfer/discharge of a resident, along with the reason for the transfer. This was evident for 4 (#12, 38, 55, 61) of 4 residents reviewed that were transferred to an acute care facility. The findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #12 on 1/17/19 revealed documentation that Resident #12 was sent to an acute care facility on 9/6/18, and 9/14/18. There was no written documentation found in the medical record that the resident and/or resident representative was notified of the transfer in writing. Interview of the Director of Nursing, on 1/18/19 at 10:09 AM, revealed that he/she thought that the business office was sending out written notification. Interview of the business office personnel (staff #8) revealed that the facility was not sending out any written notification when the facility initiated a resident transfer to an acute care setting. 2) On 1/18/19, a review of Resident #38's medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$65,400 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $65,400 — penalty dated 2025-06-27
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LORIEN HEALTH SERVICES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLLISON, MICHELE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| JURAS, ROSEMARY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| LICATA, LINDA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, JOANNE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, LOUIS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, NICHOLAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, PETER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, SAMUEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| O'KEEFE, FRANCES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| BEARD, BERNADETTE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| GRIMMEL, LOUIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/18/2004 |
| MARYLAND HEALTH ENTERPRISES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215348. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.