Lorien Health Systems Mt Airy
705 Midway Avenue, Mount Airy, MD 21771 · For profit - Corporation · 62 certified beds · (301) 829-6050 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.2% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.8% | 0.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.5% | 22.8% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.5% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.6% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.3% | 5.9% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.7% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.7% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.6% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.3% | 80.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.5% | 21.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.4% | 9.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.26 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.56 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
69.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 222 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 69.7%CMS range 64.0–75.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 8.2–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 50.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 80.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 4.0–10.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.92 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 57.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.24 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-07 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 4 (#9, #1, #4, #3) of 12 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident.1) On 5/5/26 at 9:03 AM a review of Resident #9's medical record was conducted and revealed Resident #9 had current diagnoses of thrombocytopenia and history of malignant neoplasm of other sites of lip, oral cavity, and pharynx.Review of a 12/19/25 physician's note documented, thrombocytopenia, unspecified*: Critically low platelet count at 30 trending down from 116 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to follow wound care provider's orders for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #8) of 3 residents reviewed for wound care during a complaint survey.The findings include:Review of Resident #8's medical record on 5/5/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in 2025 with a diagnosis to include peripheral vascular disease (PVD). PVD is a slow and progressive circulation disorder characterized by narrowing, blockage or spasms in blood vessels, commonly affecting the legs.Further review of Resident #8's medical record revealed on 2/22/26 the facility staff assessed the Resident to have a wound to the second right toe and began treatment.The Resident was seen and assessed by the Wound Care NP (Nurse Practitioner) on 2/24/26 who ordered treatment of the wound.On 3/3/26 the Resident was seen and assessed by the Wound Care NP. At that time the Wound Care NP changed the treatment orders for the Resident's second right toe. The Wound Care NP ordered: a) Cleanse wound with wound cleanser b) Apply Skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide documentation that Advance Directives (AD) was reviewed with and/or information/education regarding advance directives provided to residents and/or their responsible representatives (RP). This was evident for 2 (#4 and #11) of 37 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:1) On [DATE] at 2:35 PM, a review of the Resident’s #11’s medical record revealed that there was no documentation to support that the advance directives were obtained as required. On [DATE] at 11:37 AM A review of the resident records revealed that a Social Work admission Assessment was completed on [DATE]; section “F” of the assessment revealed that Resident #11 had a MOLST form in the chart. However, there was no evidence to support that the AD was obtained, or that documentation was provided to the resident and or the representative. On [DATE] at approximately 11:49 AM, in an interview with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan. This is evident for 1 (Resident #11) of 24 resident care plans reviewed during the survey process.The findings Included:A voiding trial is the removal of a urinary catheter allowing the bladder to fill with urine naturally, and monitoring voiding to see if the bladder has returned to normal so that the urinary catheter can be removed permanently.On 08/04/2025 at 2:21 PM, in a resident representative interview, they expressed concern for the Resident #11's recurrent Urinary Tract Infection (UTI).On 08/11/2025 at 1:11 PM, in an interview with RN #10, she reported that Resident #11 had a history of recurrent UTI. The resident was admitted to the facility without a urinary catheter; however, after the resident's admission, the resident began to have difficulty with urination, as a result a urinary catheter was ordered and inserted as ordered. RN #10 reported that they have attempted voiding trials since the resident's admission, but the resident failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to revise the care plan by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment. This was true for 1 (Resident #21) of 3 resident records reviewed for hospitalization during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:A care plan is a tool used to summarize the resident's healthcare needs, treatments, and care goals. This tool is to be developed within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment (MDS) and prepared by an interdisciplinary team.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a standardized comprehensive assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents.Mechanical ventilator is a machine that promotes or supports the movement of air in and out of the lungs. The machine takes over the work of breathing when a person is unable to breathe on their own.Tracheostomy is a surgical hole or stoma which consists of making an incision on the front of the neck to open a direct airway to the trachea. A tracheostomy allows air to pass into the windpipe to help with breathing.On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a complaint, medical record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure staff followed physician orders as evidenced by failure to ensure residents receive medications as ordered by the physician. This was evident for 1 (Resident #69) of 37 residents reviewed during a recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:On 8/8/2025 at 11:26 AM, review of a complaint #365844 revealed that Resident #69's medicines were not given as prescribed.On 8/11/2025 at 8:11 AM, a review of Resident #69's Medication Administration Audit Report from 4/3/2025 through 4/9/2025 for actual times meds were given revealed the resident's meds were not given as scheduled on the following dates/time:- On 4/3/2025: Med [Tizanidine HCL 4 mg tab ordered for 23:00 (11:00 PM) was given on the next day (4/4/2025) at 06:40 (6:40 AM)] - more than 7 hours past the scheduled time.- On 4/3/2025: Meds scheduled for 20:00 (8:00 PM) were given on the next day (4/4/2025) at 06:40 (6:40 AM).- On 4/4/2025: Pain med scheduled for 20:00 (8:00 PM) was given at 23:44 (11:44PM); more than 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to label and date humidifier bottles and oxygen tubing with change dates per physician's orders. This was evident for 2 (#33 and #47) of 4 residents reviewed for Respiratory care during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During the initial rounds on 8/4/25 at 10:16 AM and on 8/5/25 at 8: 56 AM, Resident #33 was observed to be on supplemental oxygen (O2) delivered through a nasal cannula (a device that delivers O2 through the nose) and attached to a humidifier bottle on the O2 concentrator at the bedside in the resident's room. The humidifier bottle and the O2 tubing were not dated to indicate when they were last changed. A review of the physician's order on 8/5/25 at 9:10AM revealed an order that reads Check SPO2 Q shift - Administer OXYGEN TO MAINTAIN SPO2 >92% DOCUMENT LITERS PER MINUTE (LPM) VIA NASAL CANNULA APPLICABLE FOR HYPOXIA . A second order reads: OXYGEN EQUIPMENT: 11-7 Shift Weekly O2/NEB Equipment CHANGE O2 TUBING NASAL CANNULA AND HUMIDIFER…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to assess the effectiveness of pain medication consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 resident records reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings included:On 08/08/2025 at 12:52 PM, a review of Resident #2's record revealed that the resident had an order for traMADol HCl Tablet 50 MG Give 0.5 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for PAIN. A review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that on 6/23/2025 at 05:59 AM the resident received tramadol for a pain level of 7 out of 10 (severe pain); however, it was documented that the medication was not effective. A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and MAR for medication reassessment and interventions showed that there was no documented evidence that additional interventions were implemented.On 08/11/2025 at 1:15 PM, in an interview RN #10, she was asked about the expectation for the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview it was determined facility staff failed to remove expired supplies from a medication cart. This was evident for 1 of 3 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling during a recertification survey.The findings include:An IV start kit typically includes essential supplies for inserting an intravenous (IV) line. They usually contain a tourniquet (used to make veins more visible and accessible for needle insertion), antiseptic wipes (used to disinfect the insertion site, minimizing the risk of infection), IV catheter (the device that is inserted into the vein to provide access for fluids or medications), a transparent dressing, gauze, tape, and sterile gloves. They may also include other items like saline syringes, IV tubing, and needles. The specific contents can vary by manufacturer and kit type.Expiration dates are primarily related to maintaining the sterility of the kit's components. Using expired items can pose infection risks.On [DATE] at 8:50 AM, Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 1 (Resident #65) of 37 residents reviewed during a recertification / complaint survey.The findings include:A closed record review of Resident #65's medical records for death conducted on [DATE] at 10:47 AM, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 11:41 AM, review of Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for [DATE] revealed staff documentation that assessments were done and treatments were provided during the evening and night shifts on [DATE] for Resident #65:- Medications scheduled to be given in the evening and at bedtime for [DATE] had staff documenting NI.[NI=Clinical Finding WNL(within normal limit) - No intervention required] as indicated under Chart codes/Follow up codes.- Night shift staff documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to have a social service director and a medical director participate monthly in the facility's Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee meetings.The findings include:Review of the monthly QAPI sign-in sheet for August 2024, the medical director signature block indicated Leave of Absence (LOA) and March 2025 and June 2025, the social service director signature block indicated Leave of Absence (LOA).During an interview on 08/13/2025 at 11:41 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), and staff # 4, the DON stated that there is no designated person for the Medical director, and the facility had one social services worker, who is the director. Staff #4 stated that he/she would discuss the information from the QAPI meeting during the risk management meeting with the members who were absent from the QAPI committee meeting.On 08/13/2025 at 11:48 AM staff #4 stated that he/she acted as the designee for the Social Services Director and the facility had a covering medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be free from verbal abuse perpetrated by staff. This deficient practice affected 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #5) of 18 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse Policy, revised 02/06/2025, indicated, It is the policy of [facility name] to: Maintain a ZERO tolerance of ANY form of abuse or neglect of a resident. The policy specified, Verbal Abuse - The use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #3 on 05/12/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of pulmonary embolism, cognitive communication deficit, hypertension, and history of falling. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of a facility reported incident, record review, interview with staff and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications to residents according to facility policy and standard nursing practice for resident medication rights. This was evident for 1(Resident #8) of 3 residents reviewed related to medication administration. The findings include: According to the state nurse practice act the five main medication rights to ensure as a licensed nurse that medications are administered safely are to verify prior to administration the; right person, medication, dose, time and route. Review of the facility reported incident MD00190869 on 2/18/25 at 10:37 AM revealed a concern related to an RN, identified as staff #108, who admitted that on 4/2/23 she prepared medications for 2 different Residents, 8 and #12 at the same time. RN #108 then proceeded to the room of Resident #108 with both medicine cups, respectively labeled for each resident. According to the statement from staff #108 included in the facility investigation packet, as she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of a complaint, medical records, facility policy and procedures and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to have processes in place to ensure for the daily care and potential complications of residents' percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes (PEG inserting a feeding tube directly into the stomach through the abdominal wall). This was evident during the review of 5 (Residents #4, #6, #16, #17, #18) of 6 residents with PEG tubes secondary to a complaint during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of the complaint #MD00203009 on 2/18/25 at 12:53 revealed concerns related to the care of and replacement of a PEG tube for Resident #6 after it inadvertently came out. After the replacement of Resident #6's PEG tube on 2/3/24, the complainant reported that according to the hospital, there was too much water in the balloon and that s/he was vomiting repeatedly, that's why the family requested the x-ray. Further review currently revealed diagnosis of Resident #6 including admission post anoxic brain injury (a condition where the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of a facility reported incident, record review, interview with staff and observations, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications to residents without any significant medication errors. This was evident for 1(Resident #8) of 3 residents reviewed related to medication administration. The findings include: Review of the facility reported incident MD00190869 on 2/18/25 at 10:37 AM revealed a concern related to an RN, identified as staff #108, who admitted that on 4/2/23 she prepared medications for 2 different residents, #8 and #12 at the same time. RN #108 then proceeded to the room of Resident #8 with both medicine cups, respectively labeled for each resident. According to the statement from staff #108 included in the facility investigation packet, as she left the room for Resident #8 and proceeded to the room for Resident #12, it was then she realized that she still had the medicine for Resident #8 and that she had administered the medication for Resident #12 to Resident #8. Medical record review for Resident #8 revealed diagnosis to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations and staff interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to keep the nursing unit and resident rooms in clean and good repair. This was evident during environmental tours conducted on 2 of 2 nursing units during the annual survey. The findings include: On 12/14/22 at 9:13 AM an environmental tour was conducted with the Director of Maintenance, Staff #36. The following environmental and housekeeping observations were shown to Staff #36 and discussed: The ceiling tile outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] in the hallway had an approximate 6 inch brown circular stain. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the wall to the right of the door and under the window had areas of spackle over the paint. In the bathroom the over the toilet riser was rusted in the front by the seat and by the back hinge. In room [ROOM NUMBER]A the privacy curtain had many stained marks and there was paint peeling above the door by the ceiling. There were areas of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-14 · tag F0685 — patternAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment/services to maintain vision. This was evident for 2 (#16, #29) of 3 residents selected for reviews of vision care during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) A review of Resident #16's medical record on 12/07/22 revealed that Resident #16 was seen and assessed by the facility's eye physician on the following days and prescribed medications to treat the following conditions: a) on 07/19/22, Resident #16's eye physician documented that Resident #16 suffered from a history of Corneal neovascularization of the right eye, had Conjunctival hyperemia in both the right and left eyes that were getting worse, and that both eyes have long-standing tenderness that comes and goes, and both are light sensitive. Resident #16's eye physician documented these findings in a consultation note and indicated the plan was to administer in a New Medication Order, 1) Ocuoft Lid Scrubs Plus Pads, apply 1, Both eyes, twice daily indefinitely. Apply with eyes closed, go from inside to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to keep a resident's drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs by failing to follow physician ordered blood pressure parameters for administering Carvedilol and Midodrine, blood pressure medications, and physician ordered glucose parameters for Levemir, which is a long acting insulin that helps control blood sugar levels. This was evident for 2 (#3, #21) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary drugs during the annual survey. The findings include: 1) On 12/13/22 at 10:09 AM a review was conducted of Resident #3's medical record. Review of physician's orders that were written on 7/13/22 revealed the order, Carvedilol 12.5 mg. give 1 tablet enterally (via tube) in the morning for Afib (atrial fibrillation). Hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) less than 110, HR (heart rate) below 80. The top number of the blood pressure refers to the amount of pressure in the arteries during the contraction of the heart muscle. This is called systolic pressure. The bottom number refers to the blood pressure when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and documentation review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that, 1) equipment was maintained in proper working condition, 2) sanitary practices were followed while preparing food, and 3) food temperatures were consistently monitored and documented. This was evident during 2 of 2 visits to the facility kitchen during the annual survey. The findings include: 1a. On 12/5/22 at 9:20 AM a tour of the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) #5 was conducted. Observation was made of the freezer that had small ice mounds on the ceiling in front of the 2 condenser fans. CDM #5 stated that they have had the freezer checked a couple of times. A second observation was made of the freezer on 12/9/22 at 11:59 AM with Staff #41. There were ice mounds on the ceiling and were starting to spread towards the door. Staff #41 stated that the company for the freezer had been notified a few weeks ago and they were still waiting for a callback. Staff #41 stated that the freezer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the reviews of a medical record, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to maintain a medical record in the most accurate form. This was evident for 4 (#16, #48, #20, #21) of 34 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A medical record is an official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) A review of Resident #16's December medication administration record (MAR) on 12/12/22 at 9:22 AM, revealed an order instructing the nursing staff to apply a Calcium Alginate Dressing, to the right buttock, topically, every day shift for wound care. First, cleanse with normal saline, pat dry and apply treatment, cover with dry, protective, dressing (DPD), to start on 10/12/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident was offered the opportunity to develop an advance directive for 2 (#22, #55) of 2 sampled residents for advance directives. The findings include: An advance directive is a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will be made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor. It is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity. A Maryland MOLST (Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form is used for documenting a resident's specific wishes related to life-sustaining treatments. The MOLST form includes medical orders for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and other medical personnel regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and other life-sustaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview it was determined that facility staff failed to protect Resident #261's right to confidentiality of his/her medical record. This was evident during a random observation on 1 of 2 nursing units. The findings include: On 12/14/22 at 8:57 AM observation was made of an unlocked and unattended medication cart sitting in the hallway on the Prospect nursing unit. There was a laptop computer sitting on the top of the medication cart that was opened and displayed Resident #261's medication administration record (MAR). The surveyor stood at the medication cart until 9:00 AM when Staff #34 walked up to the medication cart. The surveyor asked Staff #34 if she knew that she left the resident's information on the computer screen open and on display. Staff #34 stated that she just went down the hall to get something for the resident. The surveyor asked where she was down the hall and Staff #34 stated she was down the hall and around the corner, out of sight of the medication cart. Staff #34 stated that she didn't mean to leave the medication cart unlocked and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the reviews of a medical record, observation, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to revise the physician wound care orders. This was evident for 1 (#16) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure sores during an annual recertification survey. The findings include: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore, or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II (superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister, or shallow crater), Stage III ( full-thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full-thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full-thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and/or eschar in the wound bed). A review of Resident #16's December medication administration record (MAR) on 12/12/22 at 9:22 AM, revealed an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility pharmacist failed to identify and report irregularities in the resident's drug regimen to the physician, facility's medical director and the director of nursing. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 7 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: On 12/13/22 at 10:09 AM a review was conducted of Resident #3's medical record. Review of physician's orders that were written on 7/13/22 revealed the order, Carvedilol 12.5 mg. give 1 tablet enterally (via tube) in the morning for Afib (atrial fibrillation). Hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) less than 110, HR (heart rate) below 80. The top number of the blood pressure refers to the amount of pressure in the arteries during the contraction of the heart muscle. This is called systolic pressure. The bottom number refers to the blood pressure when the heart muscle is between beats. This is called diastolic pressure. The order was not clear as it did not state if the medication should be held when both parameters were not met, or just 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and documentation review, it was determined facility staff failed to keep medication carts locked when unattended. This was evident on 1 of 2 nursing units observed during the annual survey. The findings include: On 12/14/22 at 8:57 AM observation was made of an unattended and unlocked medication cart sitting in the hallway on the Prospect nursing unit. On top of the medication cart was a 30 ml. plastic medicine cup with 7 pills in the cup. The computer screen on top of the medication cart was opened to Resident #261's Medication Administration Record (MAR). The surveyor was able to open all the drawers in the medication cart. In the second drawer observation was made of 2 plastic 30 ml. medication cups. The bottom cup contained 3 pills and the second medication cup, which was sitting inside the other medication cup contained 1 pill. At 9:00 AM Staff #34 walked up to the medication cart and the surveyor asked her if she realized she left the cart unlocked while unattended. Staff #34 stated she just went down the hall to get a tube of cream. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program and facility staff failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of disease by failing to follow infection control guidelines during the handling of linens. This was evident for random observations made during the tour of the Prospect unit. The findings include: 1) Observation was made of the Prospect Unit on 12/5/22 at 9:15 AM. The surveyor observed Geriatric Nursing Assistant, GNA #7, attempting to pull out clean linens from a linen cart that was in the hallway by room N09, but the linen she pulled out of the cart fell on to the floor. GNA #7 picked up the linen from the floor and using the same hand reached into the clean linen cart and pulled out more linen. She then placed them on top of the ones she picked up from the floor and using the same hand picked up a piece of paper that was laying on the floor. GNA #7 then went into room N09 and placed the linen on the windowsill. Without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, resident-centered care plans to meet the distinct needs of residents with dementia. This was evident for 2 (#48 and #22) of 27 resident reviewed during this survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) A medical record review, on 6/3/19 at 8:19 AM, for Resident #48, revealed the resident was admitted with a diagnosis of dementia, however, staff failed to have a care plan for dementia. 2) On 5/30/19 at 7:13 AM, a medical record review for Resident #22, revealed the resident was admitted with dementia with behavioral outburst. Review of the care plan revealed a focus of impaired brain function, because of the dementia, with a goal that stated, I (the resident) will be able to communicate basic needs on a daily basis through the review date and the interventions were standard, such as keep…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and medical record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to treat residents with dignity and respect by failing to provide mealtime assistance to eat in timely manner to a resident who was dependent on staff . This was evident for 1 (#44) of 27 residents in the final sample. The findings include: During an observation of a resident dining experience, on 5/28/19 at 12:32 PM, there were 2 Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) #13 and GNA #14 in the dining room to assist residents. Resident #44 sat at a table of 7 residents. It was noted that the resident's food remained uncovered and sitting in front of him for 15 minutes until more staff arrived to help feed the other residents. During a review of this resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/2/19 on 5/28/19 at 1:00 PM, revealed resident was totally dependent on staff. Director of Nursing was made aware of these findings on 6/3/19 at 11:20 AM.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-03 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to have a process in place to provide prior notice of care plan meetings to the resident. This was evident for 1 (#49) of 27 residents reviewed for care plans during the survey. The findings include: An interview with Resident #49 on 5/31/19 at 11:53 PM, revealed the resident was unaware of the purpose of and their right to attend a care planning meeting. Resident reports he/she has never been to a care planning meeting. During a review of the resident's medical record on 5/31/19 at 10:56 AM, it was noted that the baseline care plan meeting roster did not have a signature for the resident. An interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) #10 on 5/31/19 at 11:10 AM. RN #10 reported that the family had invited the resident, but s/he declined to come. RN #10 added that although she never interviewed him/her, the resident was confused and would not have been able to make good decisions regarding their care. An interview on 5/31/19 at 12:50 PM, with the Social Work…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-03 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to 1) ensure that resident records remained secure and confidential, and 2) provide privacy for a resident while they were receiving care. This was evident for 1 of 3 observations of medication administration and for 1 (#49) of 1 resident reviewed for privacy. The findings include: 1) A medication observation took place on 5/31/19 at 7:50 AM. During the observation, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 stated that s/he needed to return to the nurse's station to obtain medication for Resident #23 that was not available at the medication cart. LPN #1 left the medication cart at 7:53 AM but did not lock the screen, leaving Resident #23's protected health information visible on the screen. The cart was sitting in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] and the screen, fully open, faced into the room. LPN #1 returned to the cart at 7:54 AM. LPN #1 continued to prepare medication for Resident #23 and again stated that s/he needed to return to the nurse's station to obtain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to document accurately the medication administered to a resident on the Minimum Data Set (MDS). This was evident for 1 (#32) of 27 residents reviewed during the survey. The MDS is a federally-mandated assessment tool that helps nursing home staff gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. Information collected drives resident care planning decisions. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. The findings include: Review of Resident #32 medical record on 5/31/19 at 1:00 PM, revealed the resident was ordered Xarelto 20mg (milligram) by mouth daily for chronic Atrial fibrillation. Xarelto is a blood thinner medication or anticoagulant. Further review of the medical record revealed on 1/30/19, the medication was placed on hold due to vaginal bleeding until lab results were obtained. Continued review of the medical record revealed the lab results were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan and failed to provide residents/representatives with a copy of their baseline care plan and medication list. This was evident for 1 (#49) of 27 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. A record review for Resident #49 on 5/31/19 at 10:56 AM, revealed that the resident was admitted with a feeding tube (tube in the stomach to receive nutrition), aspiration precautions, pacemaker, and skin breakdown. However, the baseline did not include guidance to the care team regarding these medical issues and the specialized care for this resident. An interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #10, revealed that she does not consistently print baseline care plan and medication list to give to the resident/representative in 48 hours. She states, I will take the hit on this one because she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to evaluate and update a resident's care plan to reflect current needs and preferences. This was evident for 1 (#22) of 27 residents reviewed for care plans. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. During an observation of Resident #22 on 5/29/19 at 10:32 AM, Resident #22 was seated in the dining room, while the Activities Aide Staff #6 was playing a game of bingo. Resident's back was to Staff #6 as he called the Bingo numbers and resident was not engaged. A review of the resident's medical record on 5/30/19 at 7:13 AM, revealed that a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/3/19 had been completed. However, review of the1/26/18 care plan revealed a focus for activities with a goal that resident would like music programs, 1:30 PM church services, and special events. The interventions were initiated in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents remained free of accidents while being transferred by facility staff. This was evident for 1 (#1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: Resident #1's medical record was reviewed on 5/31/19 at 9:28 AM. During the review, a note was found that had been written in early November, 2018, that stated, Resident received bump at right forehead from Hoyer arm when transferring by Hoyer from bed into shower chair today. Attending physician in building at the time, assessed [him/her] right away . Pressure dressing and ice applied. Neuro checks have been stable per bedside nurse since incident. Resident also has reddened sclera of left eye. Attending physician stated it is a ruptured vessel, and is expected to resolve without intervention. A Hoyer lift is an assistive device that lifts a resident out of bed using a sling that is placed under the resident. It is used for residents who are completely dependent on staff to exit the bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-03 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined that what the physician documented in the resident's progress notes, did not accurately reflect what was in the resident's medical records. This was evident for 2 (#12, #32) of 27 residents reviewed in final sample. The findings include: 1.Review of resident #12's medical record on 5/30/19 at 2pm, revealed two physician's progress notes, dated 4/28/19 and 5/11/19. Both physician progress notes revealed that the physician documented the resident was receiving Lorazepam 0.25mg (milligrams) by mouth twice a day for Anxiety. Further review of the medical record revealed a physician order, dated 4/16/19, and clarified on 4/20/19, to decrease the resident's Lorazepam 0.5mg to Lorazepam 0.25mg three times a day due to excessive sedation. During interview with the physician on 6/1/19 at 4pm, s/he stated, the nursing staff informed me that the resident was receiving the medication twice a day. 2. Review of resident #32 medical record, on 5/31/19 at 10am, revealed a physician order, dated 1/11/19, to administer Xarelto 20mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-03 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of resident medical records, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a plan of care that addressed the needs of a resident with dementia. This was evident for 2 (#37 and #48) of 6 residents reviewed for dementia care. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. Dementia is a general term used to describe a group of symptoms related to loss of memory, judgment, language, complex motor skills, and other intellectual function, caused by the permanent damage or death of the brain's nerve cells. 1) Resident #37's electronic medical record was reviewed on 5/30/19 at 9:50 AM. During the review, it was found that the resident was diagnosed with unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, and was receiving medication treating that diagnosis. The resident's care plan was reviewed for inclusion of goals and interventions that addressed the resident's needs related to his/her dementia diagnosis. No care plan topic was found…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determine that the facility staff failed to follow through on a pharmacy recommendation. This was evident for 1 (#48) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the investigation phase of the survey. The findings include: A medical record review for Resident #48 on 6/3/19 at 9:30 AM, revealed a pharmacy recommendation, dated 5/12/19, which documented that staff needed to complete an AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) assessment related to antipsychotic use and to stop a blood thinner. A resident with long term use of an antipsychotic is at risk for developing abnormal involuntary movement that can be a permanent side effect. AIMS is an effective tool to monitor side effects. However, at the time of this medical record review, on 6/3/19, the attending physician had not completed the documentation regarding her/his agreement with, or disagreement with the recommendations made. An interview with the Director of Nursing, Unit Manager Staff #9, and the Infection Control Preventionist on 6/3/19 at 11:30 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff ordered and administered an excessive amount of Coumadin to Resident. This was evident for 1 (#12) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings include: The facility staff ordered and administered an excessive amount of Coumadin to Resident (#12). Coumadin is a blood thinner. It can treat and prevent blood clots. Review of the medical record, on 5/31/19 at 10am, for resident #12 revealed a physician's order to administer 2.5mg (milligrams) of Coumadin on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday and 3mg on Saturday and Sunday. On 5/20/19 the resident had a scheduled PT and INR drawn which resulted in the following: PT 46 (normal range according to this lab was 9-12) and INR 4.59 (critical high)- (normal range according to this lab was 2-3). The PT stands for prothrombin time. The INR stands International Normalized Ratio. Physicians measure patients' INR level during a PT-INR test. The test measures how much time it takes for a patient's blood to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record and interview with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents receiving psychoactive medication received behavioral and mood monitoring for the conditions that the psychoactive medications were prescribed for. This was evident for 1 (Resident #37) of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The findings include: Resident #37's medical record was reviewed on 6/3/19 at 1:35 PM. During the review, it was found that the resident was receiving an antipsychotic medication for the diagnosis, other specified depressive episodes. Review of orders for the resident failed to reveal an order to monitor for specific behaviors related to that diagnosis. Prior to his/her hospitalization in May, 2019, Resident #37's medication management notes from the psychiatric consulting service at the facility demonstrated that the resident had been prescribed more psychiatric medication at that time: two antipsychotic medications, one antidepressant medication, one prescription sleeping aid, and one medication with significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, it was determined that the facility failed to have a medication error rate of greater than 5%. This was based on 2 errors occurring over 31 opportunities for error during 3 observations of medication administration. The findings include: During a medication observation that took place on 5/31/19 at 7:42 AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, LPN #1 was noted to have touched medication with his/her bare hands prior to administering those medications to residents. This occurred once during administration of medication to Resident #159 and again during administration to Resident #23. This resulted in 2 medication errors occurring over 31 opportunities for error, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.45%. Cross Reference F880.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-03 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolatedEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews with facility staff and resident, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that there was not greater than 14 hours between the resident receiving his/her last meal for the evening and the next scheduled meal. This was found to be evident 1 (#32) of 27 residents reveiwed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey observation rounds. Findings include: During observation rounds on /28/19 at 10:30am, Resident # 32 said, s/he had not received breakfast yet. Additionally, the resident reported that the facility does not always wake him/her up for breakfast. The Unit Manager and the Dietary manager was made aware at 10:45am. An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager on 5/28/19 at 11am, and s/he stated, the resident tray was sent to the unit and returned on the cart. I am not sure if the meal was touched. S/he stated, Another tray will be sent to the resident. At 12:30pm during dining observation rounds, the resident still had not received a breakfast tray. The resident's lunch was being delivered by GNA #1 at that time. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility 1) failed to ensure that medications were administered in a sanitary manner, and 2) failed to follow infection control practices by handing residents' food in a safe and sanitary manner. This was evident for 1 of 3 medication administration observations for 2 residents (#159, #23) and 3 (#44, #22, and #24) of 7 residents at a table chosen for dining observation. These practices had the potential to affect all residents at the facility. The findings include: A medication observation was performed, on 5/31/19 at 7:42 AM, during which Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 administered oral medication to Resident #159. After preparing and explaining the medication to the resident, LPN #1 handed the small plastic cup of 10 tablets to the resident who was able to take and swallow the medicine with only supervision. While tipping tablets into his/her mouth, one unknown tablet fell from the plastic cup onto Resident #159's chest. The resident attempted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to LORIEN HEALTH SERVICES — 8 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 5 of 5 | 3.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 3.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 3.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
The other 7 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COLLISON, MICHELE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| JURAS, ROSEMARY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| LICATA, LINDA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, NICHOLAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, PETER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, SAMUEL | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| O'KEEFE, FRANCES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 10% | since 10/18/2004 |
| MANGIONE, LOUIS | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/18/2004 |
| GRIMMEL, LOUIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/18/2004 |
| MARYLAND HEALTH ENTERPRISES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/09/1995 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215335. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.