No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Denton Nursing And Rehab

420 Colonial Drive, Denton, MD 21629 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 100 certified beds · (410) 479-4400 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$18,636 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (91) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $18,636 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-04)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
920 Market St · (410) 479-1388 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
610 Legion Rd · (410) 479-0758 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
512 Franklin St · (410) 479-2452 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.6%20.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.1%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms39.6%22.8%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%2.4%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.0%22.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.4%16.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.7%96.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.9%5.9%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.9%25.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table34.4%13.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%1.1%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine50.9%80.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.8%21.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.3%9.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.671.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.631.201.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

40.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF40.9%CMS range 31.8–49.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 7.9–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.2–9.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.00
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.28
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.54
RN hoursweekends
48.7%
Total nursing turnover
60.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 83.9 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.28 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.00 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-16)
25
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

91 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 79 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of a complaint, medical record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to keep a dependent resident free from injury while transferring the resident from the bed to the chair via a Hoyer lift, which resulted in actual harm to Resident (R) #11. The failure of facility staff to follow the plan of care while transferring a resident resulted in bilateral sacral fractures and a L2 fracture. This was evident for 1 (#11) of 3 residents reviewed for falls. The findings include:A Hoyer lift is a mechanical device that uses a sling to safely lift and move a resident who is unable to transfer themselves between surfaces like a bed, wheelchair, or toilet. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-09-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility documentation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment resulting in psychosocial and physical harm to a resident (Resident #9). This was evident for 1 of 79 residents in the facility on 1/24/25 and reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include:Review of facility documentation provided by the Administrator on 8/27/25 revealed the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) conducted a Life Safety Code complaint survey on 1/29/25 and found the facility was cited for not maintaining temperature in the attic to prevent pipes from freezing causing the pipes to rupture. During interview with the Director of Maintenance (DM) on 9/2/25 at 11:05 AM, The DM stated the pipes were not insulated and the broken pipes caused the ceiling to collapse on Resident #9 who was in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 1/24/25. The DM stated no other residents were affected. The DM stated the facility has implemented their plan of correction, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to store food in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety in the kitchen and the resident refrigeration units. This practice had the potential to affect all residents that eat food prepared by the facility's kitchen and stored food in the refrigeration units. The findings include:1. During a tour of the kitchen with the Kitchen Manager on 3/10/2026 at 7:14 AM the following items were found:A box of fully cooked mostly dark meat chicken had been opened and did not have an open date in the walk-in freezerA clear bag of unlabeled food identified as chicken nuggets by the KM in the walk-in freezerA box of open diced carrots not wrapped or labeled with an opening date in the walk-in freezerA box of vegetable blend not labeled with an opening date in the walk-in freezerA box of southern style biscuit dough was opened and not dated in the walk-in freezerA box of chicken meatballs had an opened…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was in safe operating condition. This was found to be evident in the kitchen. This practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include:1. During a tour of the kitchen on 3/10/2026 at 7:24 AM it was discovered to have a reach-in refrigerator that had tape around a hole on the left side door where the embedded handle was previously located. The rectangular area had tape surrounding all four sides and the inside of the door was exposed. There was no handle on the left door.During an interview with the Kitchen Manager on 3/10/2026 at 7:24 AM she reported the handle on the reach-in refrigerator had been missing for a long time.During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 3/10/2026 at 11:23 AM he reported attempts had been made to fix the refrigerator handle. He advised the previous Maintenance Director had tried to secure the handle with duct tape. The Maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record reviews and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were offered written information regarding advance directives. This was evident for 4 (Residents #8, #10, #47, and #86) out of 6 residents reviewed for advance directives during the recertification and complaint survey process. The findings include: An Advance Directive is a legal document in which a person specifies their wishes regarding medical treatment in situations where they may no longer be able to express informed consent. It can include instructions about end-of-life care and may appoint a healthcare proxy (someone to make medical decisions on their behalf). On 03/10/2026 at 6:29 PM, a review of medical records revealed no written documentation indicating that the facility offered advance directives or provided education regarding advanced directives to Residents #8, #10, #47, and #86 or their resident representatives.On 03/13/2026 at 1:15 PM interview with Regional Social Worker (LMSW) reported that residents or their responsible party are asked upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure services were provided in accordance with professional standards for quality of care. This was evident for 6 (Resident #28, #5, #47,#90, #91, and #44) out of 6 Residents reviewed for professional standards during the medication administration facility task conducted as part of the annual/complaint survey. The findings include: 1) Medication is considered unnecessary if it is administered without a valid medical indication, is continued longer than clinically needed, or is not properly monitored or evaluated for effectiveness and safety. On 03/11/2026 at 10:23 AM during an unnecessary medication review, the surveyor noted that Resident #28 had an active physician's order for Bacitracin External Ointment 500 UNIT/GM (Topical) to be applied into both nostrils twice daily for dry/irritated nostrils, with a start date of 09/03/2025. Further review of medical records revealed that the order for Bacitracin External Ointment 500 UNIT/GM (Topical) for Resident #28 had been active for over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Staff were competent in their skills. This was found to be evident for 4 (GNA #1, #2, #8, & #9) out 5 Geriatric Nursing Assistants reviewed for skill competency evaluations during the recertification and complaint survey.The findings include:During a review of employee files conducted on 03/16/26 at 9:12 AM for Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA) #1, #2, #8, & #9 it was discovered that there were not any current records of skills competencies.During an interview conducted on 03/16/26 at approximately 9:45 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported that the facility conducted skills clinics that included return demonstrations. She further stated that she would obtain the records for the GNAs.On 03/16/26 at approximately 10:15 AM, the DON returned and reported that the facility failed to conduct the skill competency clinics for 2025. She also reported that she had 2026 skill competency clinics scheduled for May and June of 2026.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that (1) the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and educated on COVID-19 vaccinations and (2) the facility failed to maintain staff documentation of COVID-19 screening, education, offering, and current vaccination status. This was evident for 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #15, #5, #47, #7, and #81) and 5 of 5 staff reviewed (Geriatric Nursing Assistants #1, #2, #6, #7, and Registered Nurse #10) for COVID-19 immunization status.The findings include:(1)On 03/11/2026 at approximately 12:00 PM, this surveyor conducted a record review of electronic health records for Resident #15, #5, #47, #7, and #81 to determine COVID-19 vaccination status. The review revealed that Resident #15 had not been offered the COVID-19 vaccine since 04/12/2025, Resident #5 since 12/03/2024, Resident #47 since 02/18/2025, and Resident #81 since 12/05/2024. Resident #7, admitted in February 2026, had no documented evidence of being offered the COVID-19 vaccine.On 03/11/2026 at 3:12 PM, an interview was conducted with the Infection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations and record reviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure a functioning call bell system was available for all residents. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident's #75, #51, #58 and #98) of 18 Residents review for call bell access during the recertification survey.The findings include:1. During an interview with Resident #75 on [DATE] at 9:06 AM he/she reported that his/her call bell had been broken for a year and it comes on without the Resident activating the bell.During an observation of the call bell alerts on [DATE] at 9:15 AM it was revealed that the call bell for Resident #75 was actively alerting.During an additional observation of the call bell system on [DATE] at 11:15 AM it was discovered that the call bell for Resident #75 was again alerting.During an interview with the Infection Control and Prevention nurse (ICP) on [DATE] at 11:16 AM she reported that Resident #75 doesn't want anything, maintenance is working on getting his/her call bell fixed.During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents remained free of neglect. This was evident for 1 (Resident #75) of 1 Resident reviewed for neglect during the recertification survey. The findings include:During a review of Facility Reported incident #2730935 on 3/10/2026 at 8:35 AM it was revealed the incident was submitted to the Office of Health Care Quality on 1/30/2026. The incident reported an allegation was made by Resident #75 that no staff provided care to him/her during the 11p - 7a shift.During a review of the facility incident folder for incident #2730935 on 3/11/2026 at 10:46 AM a Follow-Up Investigation form was discovered that validated the allegation and reported it was confirmed that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #12 did not go into the room of Resident #75 to provide care during the 11p - 7a shift on the shift of 1/29/2026. The facility noted the concern was a Verified allegation and that GNA #12 was disciplined.During a review of the GNA tasks documentation on 3/11/2026 at 11:32 AM it was revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of neglect. This was evident for 1 (Resident #75) of 1 Resident reviewed for neglect during the recertification survey.The findings include:1. During a review of medical records for Resident #75 on 3/16/2026 at 9:25 AM a Hospital Consult Report had been uploaded into the medical records for Resident #75 on 12/13/2025. Upon reviewing the consultation report it was discovered that Resident #75 had went to the Emergency Department on 12/13/2025. The Emergency Department Provider Note stated the resident had complained that Resident #75 reported that he/she constantly has been getting neglected by the night shift 11p - 7a shift at the nursing facility and He/she frequently sits in his/her urine and says that they purposely ignore his/her call bell. This time, he/she called 911 for help.During an interview with the Administrator on 3/16/2026 at 9:38 AM he reported that he was not aware of the complaint that Resident #75 had made to the Emergency Department. He also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and medical record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1) quarterly care plan meetings with the interdisciplinary team were held and 2) a Residents care plan intervention was implemented. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #75 and #1) out of 18 Residents reviewed for care plans during the recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: 1) A Care Plan is used in nursing facilities to summarize a resident's health conditions and care needs. It is used to ensure resident's needs are met and consistent care is provided to the resident based on those needs. Care Plan meetings are meetings with a team of care providers (attending physician, a registered nurse with responsibility for the resident, nursing assistant with responsibility for the resident, dietary services, the resident, and the resident's representative if applicable) to ensure the plan is continually adjusted to meet the changing needs or concerns of residents. Care Plan meetings are required to be held quarterly. During an interview with Resident #75 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 79 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews it was determine that the facility failed to provide Residents with quality of care. This was found to be evident for 5 (Resident #88, #39, #41, #47 and #90) out of 18 Residents reviewed for quality of care during the recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 03/11/2026 at 10:02 AM, this surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 administer medications to Resident #88. When administering medications, LPN #4 did not explain the medications to the resident or offer the opportunity for the resident to be informed. On 03/11/2026 at 10:58 AM, this surveyor observed LPN #4 administer medications to Resident #40. LPN #4 did not explain the medications or offer the resident the opportunity to be informed. On 03/13/2026 at 8:42 AM, this surveyor observed Registered Nurse (RN) #5 administer medications to Resident #39 in a shared room with Resident #41 present. RN #5 did not provide privacy during the medication administration, as the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews it was determined that facility failed to ensure a Resident was provided with supervision. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #1) out of 1 Resident reviewed for supervision during the recertification and complaint survey.The findings include: During a review of Resident #1's progress notes conducted on 03/11/26 at 9:15 AM, it was discovered that the Resident had multiple occasions where he/she displayed inappropriate sexual behavior. A Care Plan is a formalized, personalized, and actionable document developed by healthcare professionals in collaboration with patients and families to manage specific health conditions. It acts as a roadmap for care, outlining goals, necessary interventions, and timelines. These plans are constantly updated based on patient progress. During a review of the Resident #1's Care Plan conducted on 03/11/26 at 9:22 AM, it was discovered that the Resident had a Care Plan for inappropriate sexual behavior with an intervention for a 1 to 1 supervision. During an observation of Resident #1 conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the individual designated as the Kitchen Manager was certified for food service management and safety. This had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: During an interview with the Kitchen Manager on 3/10/2026 at 7:14 AM she reported she was the kitchen supervisor and managed the Kitchen. She advised she was not currently certified and did not currently hold a Certified Dietary Manager Certification (CDM). She reported she had completed her training and took the test in October; however, she needs to retake the test. She advised she's waiting for approval to retake the test. She advised the previous Kitchen Manager left about a year ago and she took over for him. She advised the facility does have a dietician that comes to the facility every Wednesday.During an interview with the Administrator on 3/10/2026 at 2:16 PM he reported the facility has a Dietician and she comes in every so often. He confirmed the Dietician was not full time. He advised he would check on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure 1) measures were in place to prevent and monitor the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building water system. This deficiency has the potential to affect all residents who utilize the facility's water system and 2) staff perform appropriate hand hygiene. This was found to be evident for 1 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #4) of 2 LPNs observed for infection control during the recertification and complaint survey.The findings include: 1) Legionella (and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens) is bacteria that can grow in building water systems and cause illness when exposed to contaminated water. TELS is a web-based building management and maintenance software solution specifically designed for senior living and healthcare facilities. On 03/11/2026 at 2:55 PM, this surveyor conducted an interview with the Maintenance Director. When asked whether the facility has measures in place to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide influenza and/or pneumococcal immunizations as required or appropriate for residents. This was found to be evident for 4 (Resident #15, #47, #7, and #81) out of 5 Residents reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations during the Infection Control facility task conducted as part of the annual/complaint survey. The findings include:On 03/11/2026 at approximately 12:00 PM, this surveyor conducted a record review of residents' charts (Resident #15, Resident #5, Resident #47, Resident #7, and Resident #81) to determine influenza and pneumococcal vaccination status. The review showed no documentation that these vaccines were offered during the 2025-2026 season for the residents listed, with the exception of Resident #5, who was offered the influenza vaccine on 10/01/2025 and refused. Additionally, for Resident #7, admitted in February 2026, there was no documentation of vaccination status or that influenza or pneumococcal vaccines were addressed upon admission.On 03/11/2026 at 3:12 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of a closed and active medical record, reviews of all pertinent administrative records, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented. This was found to be evident for 2 (Residents #8, #9) of 9 residents reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include:Documentation is an integral part of medication administration. Documentation communicates the timing, dosing, and effect of any medications received by a patient. In the setting of skilled nursing care, residents are often prescribed multiple medications for significant medical conditions. They are also often more vulnerable to medication errors and more prone to changes in condition that require review and adjustment of their medication regimen. Inaccurate medication documentation has the potential to place residents at significant risk of medication error, provide incomplete or inaccurate information for providers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the resident's call light was within reach, per the individualized care plans, to allow access to assistance when needed. This was evident for 1 (#13) of 14 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 9/3/25 at 10:00 AM observation was made of Resident (R) #13 lying in bed. R #13 asked the surveyor to hand him/her the hair brush that was on the night stand. At that time observation was made of the call bell lying on the floor in front of the oxygen concentrator. R #13 was asked how he/she called the nurse. R #13 stated that the call bell was usually on the top of the bed, but [name] took it away from him/her because he/she was ringing it too much. At that time the surveyor showed Certified Medicine Aide (CMA) #23 the call bell that was lying on the floor. CMA #23 placed the call bell on the bed.Review of R #13's medical record revealed an ADL (activities of daily living)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, facility documentation and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify a physician promptly when a resident had a change of condition (Resident #12) and failed to notify a resident's representative when a resident had medication changes (Resident #6). This was evident for 2 of 14 residents reviewed during a complaint survey.The findings include:1.Review of Facility Reported Incident 295918 on 8/27/25 revealed the facility reported to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) that on 11/28/24 the facility staff reported to the Resident's nurse (Staff #34) that Resident #12 was declining, and Staff #34 failed to assess the Resident timely. Review of Resident #12's medical record on 8/27/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in 2015 had diagnosis to include traumatic brain injury, heart and renal failure. Further review of Resident #12's medical record revealed Staff #34's nurse's note on 11/28/24 at 12:04 PM that stated: patient noted as difficult to arouse, lethargic, plan of care ongoing. Further review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incidents, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin within 2 hours of becoming aware of the injury, to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 1 (#1) 9 residents reviewed for 10 facility reported incidents during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 8/28/25 at 7:53 AM a review of facility reported incident 295995 was conducted and revealed on 4/6/25 at 5:38 PM a staff nurse was made aware of Resident #1 having a swollen, bruised left eye. Review of the facility's investigation revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and was unable to say what happened to his/her eye. Review of the email confirmation revealed the initial self-report was sent to OHCQ on 4/7/25 at 7:57 AM, which was not within 2 hours of being informed of a bruised and swollen eye that Resident #1 obtained while residing on the Memory Care Unit.On 9/3/25 at 10:55 AM an interview was conducted with the interim Director of Nursing (DON) and the Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility reported incidents, documents, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to provide documentation that allegations of misappropriation of property were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for 1 (#2) of 9 residents reviewed for facility reported incidents during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 9/2/25 at 11:52 AM a review of facility reported incident 295797 was conducted and revealed Resident #2 alleged that on 12/17/24 between 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM someone entered the resident's room and stole money, a gift card, and 10 gift certificates. Review of the facility's investigation revealed written statements from (3) geriatric nursing assistants (GNA), (1) from the previous Director of Nursing (DON), and (3) other staff in leadership positions. The facility failed to obtain interviews or statements from any of the nurses that were working, staff from previous shifts, housekeeping staff, maintenance staff, or dietary staff that would have had access to the resident's room. On 9/4/25 at 11:08 AM an interview was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to have quarterly care plan meetings for residents (Resident #9). This was evident for 1 of 14 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include:Once the facility staff completes an in-depth assessment (MDS) of a resident, the interdisciplinary team meet and develop care plans. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assure the resident's needs are attended to. The care plan is to be reviewed and revised at each assessment time of the resident to ensure the interventions on the care plan are accurate and appropriate for the resident. Care plan meetings are held each quarter and as needed. Review of Resident #9's medical record on 8/27/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in November 2022. Further review of Resident #9's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to keep a resident's drug regimen free from unnecessary drugs by failing to follow physician ordered blood pressure and heart rate parameters for administering a blood pressure medication. This was evident for 1 (#6) of 13 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 8/28/25 at 11:50 AM a review of Resident (R) #6's medical record was conducted. R #6 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses that included but were not limited to non-rheumatic aortic (valve) stenosis, hyperlipidemia, dementia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and heart disease. Review of R #6's physician's orders revealed the order for Metoprolol Tartrate 100 mg. two times per day related to hypertension (high blood pressure) and atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is a heart rhythm disorder where the upper chambers of the heart (atria) beat irregularly and rapidly. The physician's order stated to hold for b/p (blood pressure) less than 110/65 and HR (heart rate) less than…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards (Resident #5). This was evident for 1 of 14 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. Review of Resident #5's medical record on 8/27/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in 2018 with a diagnosis to include cerebral infarction (stroke) and hemiplegia affecting left nondominant side. Hemiplegia is the total paralysis or severe loss of strength on one side of the body, affecting the arm, leg, and sometimes the face. It results from damage to the brain, often caused by stroke, brain tumors, or trauma. Review of Complaint 295996 on 8/27/25 revealed Resident #5 had lost…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to correct and monitor quality deficiencies identified on the previous survey. This was evident for 3 out of 19 deficiencies reviewed in the revisit survey. The findings include: On 11/13/2025 at 2:30 PM, A review of the survey teams findings revealed that the facility did not follow their plan of correction for 3 deficiencies (F610, F842, and S1320). Of these 3 deficiencies, S1320 was found to still be in noncompliance.On 11/14/2025 at 8:06 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the facility's Quality Assurance (QA) contact person was the Administrator.On 11/14/2025 at 8:45 AM, an interview with Administrator was conducted. When asked how often they hold QA meetings, the administrator stated every month. When asked if there was a QA meeting after the facility received the deficiencies from the Office of Health Care Quality, they stated that they did meet. When asked if the QA team/committee discussed the citations and progress of the plan of correction, the administrator stated not really…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was scheduled to meet the needs of the 81 residents in the facility. Five residents (Resident (R) 55, R48, R15, R44, and R48) and staff members, Geriatric Nurse Aide (GNA 11, GNA4, GNA9, GNA6, GNA3, GNA8, GNA5, GNA7, and GNA10), Registered Nurse (RN1), the Administrator, the Director of Nursing (DON), and the Regional Director of Labor Management voiced concerns regarding sufficient staffing, and the facility exhibited multiple failures related to a lack of sufficient staffing throughout the survey. Findings include: 1. Failure to Ensure that Residents Reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Cross-reference F677: ADL Care Provided for Dependent Residents. The facility failed to ensure that R15 reviewed for ADLs received the necessary services to maintain appropriate grooming. 2. Failure to Ensure that Residents Reviewed for Weight Loss had Weekly Weights Cross-reference F658: Quality of Care. The facility failed to ensure that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-01 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and personnel files review, the facility failed to ensure a performance review was completed for five of five Geriatric Nurse Aides (GNA)5, GNA7, GNA13, GNA4, GNA 14) once every 12 months. The failure to ensure annual performance reviews were completed had the potential to impact all 80 residents in the facility related to safety, person-centered environment, and the number of adverse events or other resident complications. Findings include: Review of five GNAs' personnel files revealed: GNA5 with a start date of 11/01/22; GNA7 with a start date of 02/15/22; GNA13 with a start date of 03/27/23; GNA4 with a start date of 11/01/22; and GNA14 with a start date of 09/14/21, revealed they had not received an annual performance review in the past 12 months. During an interview on 11/01/24 at 3:27 PM, the Human Resources (HR) Director said GNA annual performance reviews were not being completed because of nurse leadership turnover. During an interview on 11/01/24 at 4:59 PM, the Administrator, and the Director of Nursing (DON) both confirmed that annual GNA evaluations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, document review and observations, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable and appetizing temperature for two of two meal tray observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the meal consumption for all 80 of 80 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: During the initial screening on 10/29/24 several residents made comments regarding the taste and temperature of the food provided by the facility. During an interview on 10/29/24 12:53 PM, Resident (R) 339 stated that the food was not good at the facility and that the eggs for breakfast were not appetizing. Review of R339's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R339's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/18/24 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15 indicated R339's cognition was intact. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 2:10 PM, R336 stated he will get a piece of hard meat and half-baked toast. Review of R336's EMR revealed the admission MDS with an ARD of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, document review, policy review and review of the Federal and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, the facility failed to ensure food was served and prepared under sanitary conditions. The facility failed to ensure floors, baseboards, walls, appliances, hood vent and ice machine were kept clean and in good working condition. The facility also failed to ensure dietary staff adhered to sanitary requirements related to hair restraints. The deficient practice has the potential to affect 80 of 80 residents who received meals prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: Observation during the initial kitchen tour on 10/29/24 at 09:20AM, revealed the ice machine compressor was on top of the ice chest. The seam at the base of the compressor was covered with a white powdery substance. This substance could also be observed on the floor. Observation of the floor around the ice machine revealed trash, debris, a powdery white substance, and spider webs. The ice scoop was in a holder that was covered with a lid and attached to the ice chest. Inside of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse was properly disposed of in that the facility did not ensure dumpsters were maintained in a sanitary condition. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility, Findings include: During the initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 10/29/42 at 9:20AM, observation of the garbage and refuse area revealed three separate green dumpsters, on a pad of grass. In the grass, at the front and sides of the dumpsters were multiple disposable gloves. At the rear of the dumpsters was a clear plastic trash bag that had a hole and contained disposable gloves, napkins and food wrappers Interview at this time, the DM was asked who was responsible for maintaining the garbage and refuse area. The DM stated that it was a housekeeping task but added that the dietary staff will pick up around the dumpster if they find trash on the ground. The DM provided a cleaning schedule for the dietary staff, and it did not indicate that they had any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to wear the appropriate PPE when providing catheter care for one of one resident (Resident (R) 65) observed during catheter care out of a total sample of 31 residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R65) had personal protective equipment (PPE) readily available to use during catheter care that was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and failed to ensure that staff used EBP for two of three residents (R11, and R33) during care. This failure has the potential to place R65, R11 and R33 at risk for infection to the urinary tract. In addition, the facility failed to have a water management program. This failure has the potential to place all 80 residents residing in the facility at risk for Legionella. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), dated 01/31/24, indicated, .4. Indications/considerations for PPE use: a. Gloves: .ii. Perform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, personnel files review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 12 hours of required in-service training for five of 5 Geriatric Nurse Aides (GNA)5, GNA7, GNA13, GNA4, GNA14) was provided to ensure continuing competencies. The failure to ensure an effective training program was in place had the potential to impact 80 residents in the facility related to safety, person-centered environment, and the number of adverse events or other resident complications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Required Training, Certification and Continuing Education of Nurse Aides dated 09/16/24 revealed, The facility will provide at least 12 hours of in-service training annually, based on the employment date, not calendar year. Review of five GNA personnel folders revealed: GNA5 with a start date of 11/01/22; GNA7 with a start date of 02/15/22; GNA13 with a start date of 03/27/23; GNA4 with a start date of 11/01/22; and GNA14 with a start date of 09/14/21, revealed they had not completed their 12 hours of required in-service training to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of complaints, observation of resident rooms and equipment, and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was evident on 3 of 4 nursing units observed. The findings include: On 10/30/24 at 8:30 AM a review of complaint MD00201981 alleged that there was black mold in the rooms on the 400 wing. On 10/30/24 at 9:00 AM an environmental tour was conducted, and the following was observed: Room: 401/403 bathroom: Observed in the shared bathroom on the wall was a 1 ft. by 4-inch hole in the wall where the plaster was busted through to the wood studs. Room: 407 - (A) bed: the over the bed light on the wall was rusted from top to bottom. (B) bed area on back wall by the head of the bed was a 3 ft. by 2 ft. area of spackle that was not painted. The Resident stated it has been that way for a least 8 months. The trim on the wall under the television area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's investigations, medical record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to fully implement their abuse policy for an allegation of physical abuse and verbal abuse and misappropriation of property three of five residents (Resident (R) 233, R11, and R232) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 31 residents. This failure to fully implement the abuse policy, including timely and thorough investigations and and timely reporting, increased the risk of continued abuse to residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse Neglect and Exploitation, dated 02/02/24, revealed abuse means the willful infliction of injury . intimidation . with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations . instances of abuse of all residents . cause mental anguish . It includes verbal abuse . and mental abuse . alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility's investigations, medical record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to investigate allegations of physical abuse, verbal abuse, and misappropriation of property timely and thoroughly for 4 of 31 residents (Resident (R) 233, R11, R232, and R65) reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MD00201316 revealed R233 reported an allegation of physical and verbal abuse to Registered Nurse (RN)1 that Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA)15 was rough during care and threatened him if you touch your diaper you will regret it for the rest of your life and if I come back in the morning you better not have messed with your diaper. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) Face Sheet revealed R233 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] status post stroke. Review of the EMR Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/16/23 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two of five residents (Resident (R) 14 and R65) were treated with dignity and respect, out of a total sample of 31 residents. This failure has the potential to negatively affect all residents residing in the facility by affecting a resident's psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity, dated 02/02/24 indicated, It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and is in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident's rights .When interacting with a resident, pay attention to the resident as an individual .Maintain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to allow one of one resident (Resident (R) 15) reviewed from a sample of 31 residents for self-determination to make their own choice on the size of incontinent briefs to wear. This failure has the potential to affect R15 and other residents residing at the facility by not allowing the residents to make choices about aspects that affect their daily lives. Findings include: Review of R15's admission Record, under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated, R15 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of morbid obesity. During an interview with R15 on 10/29/24 at 1:00 PM, she said that she needs bigger incontinent briefs because the size she has now is rubbing her skin and they are painful to wear. During the interview, R15 was observed wearing a white incontinent brief which appeared to be too little and tight around her waist and thigh area. She said that she can not sit up with this size of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to notify a resident's responsible party (RP) when a new treatment was started for a pressure ulcer. This was evident for 1 (#65) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: A pressure ulcer, also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer, is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according to their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and/or eschar in the wound bed). On 10/29/24 at 11:34 AM a review was conducted of Resident #65's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 31 sample residents (Resident (R) 4) reviewed for Resident Council grievances was promptly resolved. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a grievance voiced by R4 during a resident council meeting on 09/24/24 was investigated, resolved, and followed up by staff. This failure had the potential to cause further grievances to be unresolved for residents throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Council Meetings, dated 02/06/24 and provided by the facility revealed, The facility will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances. 1. Review of R4's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, and major depression. Review of R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/08/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for one of six residents (Resident (R) 39) reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of 31. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Compliant with Reporting Allegations of Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, with an implementation date of 02/20/24, revealed, the purpose of . assuring the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences [of abuse] . The policy recorded that abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish, which can include . certain resident to resident altercations. Review of R39's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic hepatitis, alcoholic cirrhosis of the liver, anxiety disorder, panic disorder, and dementia. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the facility's investigations, medical record reviews, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to timely report allegations of physical abuse and verbal abuse for 5 (Resident (R) 233, R32, R28, R65, R62) of 31 residents reviewed for abuse. This failure increased the risk of continued abuse to these residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse Neglect and Exploitation, dated 02/02/24, revealed . abuse means the willful infliction of injury . intimidation . with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish which can include staff to resident abuse and certain resident to resident altercations . instances of abuse of all residents . cause mental anguish . It includes verbal abuse . and mental abuse . alleged violation is a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, or others but has not yet been investigated . mental abuse includes, but is not limited to . threats of punishment . physical abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI manual and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 75) out of 31 sampled Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments was transmitted in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of R75's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and died in the facility on [DATE]. Review of R2's MDS with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed the Death in Facility MDS was completed timely. Further review revealed this assessment was transmitted on [DATE] and should have been transmitted by [DATE] During an interview on [DATE] at 08:20AM, the MDS Coordinator (MDSC)confirmed that the facility sends their assessments to their corporate offices, and they transmit the assessments in batches. She added that she does not know when they submitted the assessment, but that she sent it to them immediately. Review of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a written care plan with interventions and goals for the use and discontinuation of an indwelling urinary catheter for one of one resident (Resident (R)11) reviewed for urinary catheters out of a sample of 31 residents. This failure resulted in R11 having an indwelling urinary catheter in place for seven months without a written comprehensive plan to discontinue the use of the urinary catheter. Findings include: A policy for care plan development was requested but not provided by the exit of the survey. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) Face Sheet revealed R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the EMR quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/13/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating R11 was cognitively intact. During an interview and observation on 10/29/24 at 10:30 AM, R11 was observed to have a urinary catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, hospice contract review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one out of one resident (Resident (R) 32) reviewed for hospice had a care plan to include hospice out of a sample size of 31 residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that all necessary interdisciplinary team (IDT) members and outside resources were invited to participate in one of one resident (R32) care conferences, out of a sample size of 31 residents. Also, facility staff failed to have quarterly care plan meetings for residents (Resident #19, #45 and #65). This was evident for 3 of 33 residents reviewed during an annual survey. These failures had the potential to affect resident care. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Revisions Upon Status Change, dated 02/13/24, indicated, .The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary .The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator and the IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] will discuss the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one of one resident (Resident (R) 3) reviewed for weight loss had weekly weights completed as ordered by the physician, out of a total sample of 31 residents. This had the potential to have increased weight loss for R3. Findings include: Review of R3's admission Record, under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R3 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dysphagia. Review of R3's Order Summary Report, dated 10/31/24, located under the Orders tab in the EMR indicated, .Weekly weights .for four weeks, start date of 10/14/24. Review of Weights and Vitals, located under the tab Weights in the EMR indicated:, 10/11/24: 115, 09/15/24: 128.6, 08/05/24: 124.6, 07/02/24: 121.8, 06/27/24: 125, and 05/31/24: 120.3. There was no documentation that R3 was weighed on 10/14/24 and/or 10/21/24. Review of Registered Dietitian (RD) Note-Nutrition/Dietary Note, dated 10/11/24, found under tab Notes in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two of two residents (Resident (R) 15, and R33) reviewed out of 33 sampled residents, for activities of daily living (ADL) received the necessary services to maintain appropriate grooming. This failure has the potential to affect R15 and other residents residing at the facility's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being by not providing necessary ADL care to dependent residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, dated 02/02/24, indicated, The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices . Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: bathing .A resident who is unable to carry out ADL's will receive the necessary services to maintain good .grooming. Review of R15's admission Record, under the Profile tab in the electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide timely treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers. This was evident for 1 (#65) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The findings include: A pressure ulcer, also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer, is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and/or eschar in the wound bed). On 10/29/24 at 11:34 AM a review was conducted of Resident #65's medical record which revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the designated smoking area was safe for one of one resident (Resident (R) 29) reviewed for smoking. R29 was the only smoker in the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure there was an accessible metal container with a self-closing cover where the ashtrays could be emptied, that did not contain trash and there was no protective cover over the smoking area to protect R29 from rain and snow. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Smoking dated 02/11/24 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide a safe and healthy environment for residents, visitors, and employees, including safety as related to smoking .Smoking is prohibited in all areas except the designated smoking areas .Safety measures for the designated smoking are will included, but not limited to: Protection from weather conditions, accessible metal containers with self-closing covers into which ashtrays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to attempt a voiding trial and to discontinue an indwelling urinary catheter after multiple urinary tract infections for one of one resident (Resident (R)11) reviewed for urinary catheters out of a total sample of 31 residents. This failure increased the risk of continued urinary tract infections and antibiotic usage. Findings include: A policy for urinary catheter use was requested but not provided by the time of exit of the survey. 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) Face Sheet revealed R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the EMR quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/13/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating R11 was cognitively intact. During an interview and observation on 10/29/24 at 10:30 AM, R11 was observed to have an indwelling urinary catheter collection bag attached to her bed frame. R11 stated she was not sure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility provided staffing documentation and interview, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days week. This was evident for 4 of 56 days reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include: Review of numerous complaints regarding low staffing from residents, staff and families during the annual survey, on 10/31/24 the Surveyor reviewed the following days for RN (Registered Nurse) coverage: 12/5/23-12/11/23, 12/29/23, 12/30/23, 1/24/24-1/30/24, 3/13-24/24, and 10/1/24-10/29/24. The following days did not have a RN as required on the staffing sheets provided by the Regional Director of Labor Management: 1/26/24 no RN coverage 1/28/24 no RN coverage 10/5/24 no RN coverage 10/20/24 no RN coverage Interview with the Regional Director of Labor Management on 11/1/24 at 8:40 AM confirmed the dates the facility failed to have a RN 8 consecutive hours a day.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication regimens was free from unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) psychotropics were not prescribed beyond 14 days without documented rational, for one (Resident (R)17) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of R17's electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R17's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/18/24, indicated the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 out of 15 which indicated R17's cognition was moderately impaired. The EMR also revealed diagnosis of anxiety disorder. Review of R17's Care plan in the EMR under the Care Plan tab revealed a focus related to R17's use of psychotropic medications initiated 12/27/23. The goal indicated be/remain free of psychotropic drug related complications, including movement disorder, discomfort, hypotension, gait disturbance, constipation/impaction or cognitive/behavioral impairment through review date.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0840 — isolated
    Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a urology consult timely to assess the continued need for an indwelling urinary catheter for one of one resident (Resident (R)11) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters out of a total sample of 31 residents. This failure resulted in the continued use of an indwelling urinary catheter without an appropriate indication for the catheter. Findings include: A policy for outside consultations was requested but not provided by the survey exit. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) Face Sheet revealed R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the EMR quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/13/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 indicating R11 was cognitively intact. During an interview and observation on 10/29/24 at 10:30 AM, R11 was observed to have an indwelling urinary catheter collection bag attached to her bed frame. R11 stated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards (Resident #19, #45 and #62). This was evident for 3 of 33 residents reviewed during an annual survey. The findings include. A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1. Review of Resident #19's medical record on 10/29/24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 10/30/24, Social Services Assistant was asked for evidence of care plan meetings for the last year. Social Services Assistant brought in evidence of care plan meetings in September 2023, November 2023, March 2024 and July 2024 on paper. Further review of Resident #19's medical record on 10/30/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, document review and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bed was inspected and maintained for one (Resident (R) 2) of 31 residents in the sample. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 10/30/24 at 10:25AM, R2 stated her bed was broken, A physical check of the electric bed revealed that the headboard and footboard were not securely attached to the bed. This resulted in a gap of approximately three to five inches between the mattress and the headboard and the footboard. Review of R2's electronic medical record (EMR), annual Minimum Data Set (MDS)' with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/16/24, has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. The Regional Director of Maintenance (RDM) was advised of this concern during an interview on 10/30/24 at 10:30AM. He confirmed that the loose headboard and footboard were a safety hazard. He added that the expectation was that residents' equipment was checked in accordance with the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and facility staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to serve and assist residents with meals on a dementia unit in a dignified manner (Resident #29, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #38). This was evident for 7 of 17 residents observed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The Surveyor observed 3 meals on the locked dementia unit due to multiple resident family members concerns that the residents on that unit are not being fed or assisted in their meals. Observation on 8/28/23 at 12:20 PM of lunch being served on the locked dementia unit revealed 17 residents in the dining room with 4 staff handing out lunch trays. At 12:30 PM Resident #37 took the milk off of Resident #36's tray. At that time Staff #30 took the milk away from Resident #37. Staff #30 failed to replace Resident #36's milk and the Resident was left with nothing to drink for the entire lunch meal. Also on 8/28/23 at 12:30 PM Staff #22 was observed standing while feeding Resident #35 and Staff #33 was observed standing while feeding Resident #29. Also on 8/28/23 at 12:40 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility investigation review, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to implement the abuse policy by failing to do thorough investigations of alleged abuse, neglect, injury of unknown origin, and misappropriation of resident property. This was evident for 5 (#3, #15, #4, #14, #12) of 16 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, injury of unknown origin, and misappropriation of resident property. The findings include: 1) On 8/22/23 at 1:05 PM a review of facility reported incident MD00173027 was conducted and revealed Resident #3 complained of left upper arm to shoulder pain. Resident #3 alleged he/she had been fixing a recliner and a tall man assisted the resident off the floor by grabbing the arm and the resident has had pain since. Review of the facility's investigation was incomplete as it did not have a statement from all staff that had worked with the resident during and before the alleged incident. 2) On 8/23/23 at 8:40 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00186361 was conducted and revealed Resident #15 was noted with bruising…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on documentation review and interview it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse, neglect, or an injury of unknown origin within 2 hours of the allegation to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) and failed to submit a final report within 5 business days. This was evident for 3 (#15, #4, #12) of 11 residents reviewed for abuse during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 8/23/23 at 8:40 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00186361 was conducted and revealed Resident #15 was noted with bruising to the right inner ankle and an x-ray which was suspicious for a nondisplaced fracture. A 11/30/22 at 8:59 AM nursing note documented that the GNA (geriatric nursing assistant) noted a bruise to the resident's right inner ankle while providing AM care. The right inner ankle had a, 12 cm x 11 cm x 0 cm yellow/greenish bruise. Right ankle is swollen and painful to touch. Radiology results that were reported on 12/1/22 at 6:34 AM reported a possible nondisplaced fracture. Review of the Comprehensive and Extended Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility reported incident investigations and interview, it was determined the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property. This was evident for 6 (#3, #15, #4, #14, #12, #24) of 16 residents reviewed for abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. The findings include: 1) On 8/22/23 at 1:05 PM a review of facility reported incident MD00173027 was conducted and revealed Resident #3 complained of left upper arm to shoulder pain. Resident #3 alleged he/she had been fixing a recliner and a tall man assisted the resident off the floor by grabbing the arm and the resident has had pain since. Review of the facility's investigation was incomplete as it did not have a statement from all staff that had worked with the resident during and before the alleged incident. On 8/23/23 at 9:40 AM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that she only started in June 2023 and was not here at the time and that was all that was in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to hold care plan meetings to include the interdisciplinary team, resident and resident's representative for residents. (Resident #2, #8, #17, #19, #27 and #29). This was evident for 6 out of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Once the facility staff completes an in-depth assessment (MDS) of the resident, the interdisciplinary team meet and develop care plans. Care plans provide direction for individualized care of the resident. A care plan flows from each resident's unique list of diagnoses and should be organized by the resident's specific needs. The care plan is a means of communicating and organizing the actions and assure the resident's needs are attended to. The care plan is to be reviewed and revised at each assessment time of the resident to ensure the interventions on the care plan is accurate and appropriate for the resident. Care plan meetings are held each quarter and as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a complaint, medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received medications and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice (Resident #2, #10, #26, #30 and #31) This was evident for 5 of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 8/24/23 at 8:34 AM complaint #MD00186966 was reviewed and revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 5:00 PM. The complaint alleged that Resident #10 did not receive his/her scheduled blood pressure medication and pain medication until the next evening. Review of Resident #10's medical record on 8/24/23 at 8:34 AM revealed a discharge summary from the acute care facility which documented Resident #10 was to receive Tylenol 1,000 mg. every 6 hours every day for pain. The summary also documented the medication Diltiazem 120 mg. was to be given twice per day. Diltiazem is prescribed for chest pain and hypertension (high blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to failed to follow up on a resident with weight loss to determine cause and need for additional interventions (Resident #18, #29 and #30). This was evident for 3 of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1. Review of Resident #18's medical record on 8/28/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include dysphagia. Dysphagia is the difficulty swallowing of foods and liquids. Review of Resident's weights revealed the Resident weighed 129.6 on 4/23/20 and 115.2 on 7/29/20 for a 14.4 pound weight loss or 11%. Review of Resident's quarterly nutrition assessments revealed the Resident was assessed by the Dietitian on 4/20/20. Further review of Resident #18's medical record revealed the Resident was not assessed quarterly by the Dietitian in July or October 2020 following a weight loss. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 8/28/23 at 2:30 PM confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined physician progress notes were not in the resident medical records the day the resident was seen (Resident #7, #9, #17) and the physician failed to review the resident's total program of care (Resident #18 and #29). This was evident for 5 of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 8/25/23 at 8:35 AM a medical record review was conducted for Resident #7. Review of physician/nurse practitioner (NP) progress notes revealed the notes were not signed and in the medical record at the time of the visit. The 7/21/21, 7/22/21, 7/30/21, 8/4/21, and 8/11/21 progress notes were not signed and put into the electronic record until 9/13/21. The 8/3/21 note was signed and put into the electronic record on 9/12/21, the 8/19/21 note was put in on 8/23/21, the 8/24/21 note was put in on 8/31/21, the 9/29/21 note was put in on 9/8/21 and the 9/14/21 note was put in on 9/29/21. 2) On 8/28/23 at 7:33 AM a medical record review was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the resident's responsible party (RP) and physician timely when a resident had a change of condition (Resident #31). This was evident for 1 of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #31's medical record on 8/28/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and the Resident has diagnosis to include peripheral vascular disease (PVD). PVD is a circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs. Further review of the Resident's medical record revealed on 2/3/23 the Nurse Practitioner (Staff #38) assessed the Resident's right foot and documented the Resident had a dressing around his/her right foot. During interview with the Resident's RP on 8/29/23 at 3:00 PM, the RP stated he/she visited the Resident almost daily and noted the Resident had a dressing on his/her right foot for a few days prior to 2/3/23 and asked the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to provide maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior. This was evident on 2 of 5 nursing units observed during a complaint survey. The findings include: On 8/30/23 at 10:10 AM observation was made of Resident #39 sitting in a wheelchair in the bedroom. The vinyl on the left wheelchair armrest was torn along the entire length of the outside edge which exposed the underneath yellow padding. The vinyl on the right armrest was also torn in a couple of areas which also exposed the underneath padding. Observation was made of Resident #20's wheelchair. The front of the right armrest was missing vinyl and the underneath padding approximately 1 inch in width and length. Observation was made of Resident #12's wheelchair. The vinyl on the right armrest was torn halfway through the top of the armrest with the underneath padding exposed. This concern was cited on the complaint survey that ended on 2/24/23. The plan of correction (POC) documented that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation and interviews, it was determined the facility staff failed to protect a resident from verbal abuse from facility staff (Resident #24). This was evident for 1 of 11 residents reviewed for abuse during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review on 8/23/23 of a facility reported incident that occurred on 7/14/23 revealed Staff #23 (Licensed practical nurse) witnessed Staff #39 (geriatric nursing assistant) tell Resident #24 (expletive language) you. Review of Resident #24's medical record on 8/23/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and is alert and oriented. During interview with Resident #24 on 8/24/23 at 10:20 AM, Resident #24 stated on the evening of 7/14/23 he/she had asked Staff #39 if she could put the him/her back to bed. Resident #24 reported every time he/she asked Staff #39 they would tell the Resident they were busy and would have to do it later. Resident #24 then stated the last time he/she asked Staff #39 to put him/her to bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 3 (#5, #9, #11) of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 8/23/23 at 11:48 AM a review of Resident #5's medical record was reviewed and revealed several behavioral notes. On 1/23/23 at 15:38 (3:38 PM) a note documented, Resident was very rude and disrespectful when this nurse attempted to give [him/her] medication. I went into [his/her] room the 2nd time to pop the pills out of the pack in front of [him/her] and [he/she] started…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident medical records and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan for residents receiving oxygen therapy and for a resident that was to be discharged to the community. This was evident for 3 (#11, #8, #16) of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) On 8/24/23 at 9:43 AM Resident #11's medical record was reviewed and revealed the vital sign section of the electronic medical record that documented oxygen use with oxygen saturation levels that began as early as 8/13/21 up to 3/9/22. Review of Resident #11's care plans failed to produce a respiratory care plan. On 8/30/23 at 3:34 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no care plan. The DON stated that they have had issues with care plans and that was something they would be working on. 2) On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers (Resident #18 and #27). This is evident for 2 of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings included: A pressure ulcer also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and / or eschar in the wound bed). A deep tissue injury (DTI) is a unique form of pressure ulcer. The National Pressure Ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to follow up and obtain a motorized wheelchair for a resident in a timely manner (Resident #19). This was evident for 1 of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record on 8/22/23 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include quadriplegia. Quadriplegia is a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs. During interview with Resident #19 on 8/22/23 at 8:30 AM, Resident #19 stated he/she has been waiting on the facility to get his/her motorized wheelchair ordered. During interview with the Administrator on 8/25/23 at 12:55 PM, the Administrator stated the wheelchair has been approved and the facility is in the process of getting. At that time the Administrator brought the Surveyor a copy of the invoice and it was noted the date on the invoice is 5/24/23. During interview with the Administrator on 8/29/23 at 4:30 PM, the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to 1) ensure that a resident who was placed on oxygen had a physician's order for oxygen along with the amount of oxygen to be administered and 2) ensure that an order for CPAP/BIPAP and oxygen had complete orders. This was evident for 2 (#11, #8) of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 8/24/23 at 9:43 AM Resident #11's medical record was reviewed and revealed the vital sign section of the electronic medical record that documented oxygen use with oxygen saturation levels that began as early as 8/13/21 up to 3/9/22. Review of physician's orders for Resident #11 failed to produce an order for oxygen. Review of Resident #11's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) failed to produce documentation that the resident was receiving oxygen. The Director of Nursing (DON) stated on 8/30/23 at 3:34 PM that there was no order for the oxygen and nowhere to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and documentation review, it was determined that facility staff failed to keep medication carts locked when unattended. This was evident for 1 of 5 nursing units observed. The findings include: On 8/30/23 at 10:12 AM observation was made of an unlocked and unattended medication cart in the 500-nursing unit next to the nurse's station. The 500-nursing unit was the dementia unit. There were no staff near the medication cart and there were 4 residents sitting in the day room and there was 1 resident walking the hallway. The surveyor was able to open the top drawer of the medication cart which contained a plastic 30 ml. medication cup containing 1 blue pill, 1 brown pill, 1 green pill, 1 white round pill, and 1 oval white pill. The other drawers of the medication cart contained resident prescription medications, supplements, and miscellaneous items. The surveyor stood at the medication cart between 1 to 2 minutes before Registered Nurse (RN) #28 walked up to the cart. RN #28 was complaining about the falls and the surveyor asked her if she realized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0839 — isolated
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to have a full time licensed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) authorized by the State of Maryland from 1/29/23 until 5/15/23. This is being cited as past noncompliance since the facility has had a licensed administrator in place since 5/15/23 and was verified by the Surveyor on 8/24/23. The findings include: During interview of the Administrator on 8/24/23 at 8:30 AM, the Administrator stated she was a licensed NHA in Virginia when she began working at the facility in November 2022 and had applied for a provisional nursing home administrator license in October 2022. The NHA stated her Regional NHA (Staff #10) was covering as the licensed NHA for the facility and had 4 buildings he was overseeing until 5/15/23 when she received her license. The NHA provided documentation on 8/24/23 from the Maryland State Board of Long-Term Care Administrators a provisional nursing home administrator license with an effective date of 10/31/22 until 1/29/23. On 8/24/23 at 8:43 AM the NHA stated she took the licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a facility reported incident, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards (Resident #2 and #13) This was evident for 2 of 41 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation for a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) On 8/25/23 at 11:15 AM a review of facility reported incident MD00189149 documented Resident #13 had an injury of unknown origin that was reported to the facility on 2/15/23 from an acute care facility. According to the incident, Resident #13 was transferred to the acute care facility emergently on 2/15/23 at 7:15 PM. The facility's investigation revealed written statements…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on facility documentation and interview, the facility failed to have an Infection Preventionist (IP) onsite. Failure to have an Infection Preventioinist has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. The findings include: An Infection Preventioinist is responsible for assessing, developing, implementing, monitoring the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program to prevent and control infections. During interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/23/23 at 8:05 AM, the DON stated the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) was serving as the IP for the facility. The DON at that time stated the ADON is not certified as an IP and has only completed 13 of the 23 modules in the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) IP training course. On 8/25/23 the ADON presented evidence to the Surveyor she has completed all the CDC IP training modules as of 8/24/23. At that time the ADON stated she began working at the facility in June 2023. Interview with the DON on 8/31/23 at 11:30 AM confirmed the facility failed to have an IP onsite until 8/24/23.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview and observation, it was determined the facility staff failed to promote care for residents in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or her individuality by labeling a resident as feeder on the July 2019 order summary sheet. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for dignity during the annual survey. The findings included: On 7/25/19 a review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed the following order 1-1 feeder for meals every day and evening shift for feeding. The term feeder Feeder is an undignified label meaning a resident is incapable of eating by themselves and is dependent on the nursing staff to feed them. Interview with the Director of Nursing on 7/25/19 at 9:00 AM confirmed that Resident #42 was labeled on the order summary sheet as a feeder.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to honor residents' right to form advanced directives concerning life sustaining treatments. This was evident for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #25, #52 and #54) selected for review of advanced directives. The findings include: Maryland Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) is a portable and enduring medical order form covering options for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and other life-sustaining treatments. The medical orders are based on a resident's wishes about medical treatments. 1.) Resident #25 who was admitted [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia and had a care planning meeting on 3/29/19 with the facility staff and his/her health care agent. During the meeting Social Worker #16 noted the MOLST and Advanced Directive was not on the paper or electronic medical record. The health care agent reported they had one at home and would send to the facility. On 7/25/19 at review of Resident #25's paper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide timely notification to a resident or representative (RP) regarding notification and explanation of their rights regarding a pending discharge from Medicare covered services. This was evident in 3 of 3 residents (Resident #128, #129 and #66), reviewed regarding liability notices. The findings include: Notification to residents regarding the end of their Medicare coverage is required to be minimally 48 hours prior to the scheduled effective date that coverage will end, therefore, affording them an opportunity to appeal the decision or to prepare for discharge. In addition, a specific form is required to be used for the notification of the non-coverage of Medicare services. On 7/25/19 at 11:54 AM the Administrator presented the survey team with 3 beneficiary notices for Resident #128, #129 and #66 for review. Upon presentation he reported that none of notices were presented to the respective residents timely for multiple reasons. He further stated that the current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and observation of residents rooms during a tour of the facility on the 300 hundred wing revealed residents' rooms were not being maintained at comfortable temperatures between 71° to 81° Fahrenheit. This was observed in 4 resident rooms. The findings include: During an initial tour of the facility resident rooms on the 300 wing on 7/23/19 at 10:12 AM the following rooms were observed to be below the accepted range of 71 to 81 degrees. The rooms were observed to have a wall unit with an adjustable thermostat for heating and cooling inside the unit that can be adjusted by staff or residents. room [ROOM NUMBER] unit thermostat was set on 64, but the surveyor's thermometer read air temperature at 67 degrees. room [ROOM NUMBER] unit thermostat was set on 66, but the surveyor's thermometer read air temperature at 67 degrees. Observation of Resident #6 revealed the resident to be shivering in the room and covers pulled up to his/her chin. room [ROOM NUMBER] unit thermostat was set on 64 degrees,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to identify and assess the side rails on the residents' beds. This was evident on the observation of 3 of 3 beds (Resident #52, #26 and #57) were side rails were covering the length of the bed that could not be lowered by the residents. The findings include: 1.) Surveyor attempted to interview Resident #52 on 7/22/19 at 9:39 AM. S/he was noted in bed with bilateral side rails up. The side rails were positioned in the middle of the bed and larger than the quarter and assist rails that were observed on the beds of other residents. Resident #52 was observed up against the right-side rail and holding on to it. S/he was unable to complete the interview screening questions or verbalize if s/he was able to lower the side rail. A second tour of the room on 7/24/19 at 10:18 AM revealed Resident #52 in bed. Staff #4 was present and confirmed the half side rails. A review Resident #52's medical record on 7/24/19 at 10:19 AM failed to reveal any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on administrative documentation, medical record review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to report an allegation of neglect to the state survey and certification agency in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 1 resident (Resident #228) reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include Review of incident MD00129060 on 7/24/19 revealed an allegation of neglect involving Resident #228. Review of the investigative documentation revealed that on 7/14/18 the resident alleged he/she was left on the floor for about an hour by nursing staff. Further review revealed that the staff allegedly told other staff to leave the resident on the floor. Further review of the facility report revealed that Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) received the report of suspected neglect on 7/16/18 2 days after the alleged incident. During interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 7/24/19, the surveyor asked for the exact date that it was reported to the state survey agency and after reviewing the investigation she reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure the resident, or their responsible party 1.) was notified in writing of the reason a resident's was transferred to the hospital (Resident #69); and 2.) received written notification of a transfer to the hospital, including appeal rights and ombudsman contact information (Resident #45). This was found to be evident for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed for hospitalization during the investigation stage of the survey. The findings include: On 6/6/19, Resident #69 was sent to the hospital for elevated temperature and blood pressure and not wanting to take food or fluids. On 7/25/19 at 10:50 AM during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) it was revealed that as of July 2019 the facility had not sent the residents or their representative a written notice of the reason for the transfer to the hospital. The Director of Nursing (DON) verbalized understanding of the deficient practice. 2. On 7/25/19 a review of Resident # 45's medical records revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) form was completed correctly on readmission to the facility. This was evident during the review of 1 of 1 resident (Resident #51) reviewed for PASARR screening. The findings include: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review is a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care. Everyone who applies for admission to a nursing facility must be screened for evidence of serious mental illness (MI) and/or intellectual disabilities (ID), developmental disabilities (DD), or related conditions. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 on 7/23/19 at 12:41 PM revealed a completed PASARR form dated 10/16/17. Further review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed in the hospital discharge record for 10/16/17, discharge diagnosis including cerebral palsy. In addition, certifications of incapacity were issued according to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop person-centered individualized comprehensive care plan as evidenced by failure to develop a care plan to address: 1.) three residents identified as having restraints (Resident #52, #25 and #57); 2.) activities (Resident #45). This was evident during the review of 4 of 25 residents during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is valuable in preventing avoidable declines in functioning or functional levels. It must reflect immediate steps for assuring outcomes which improve the resident's status and progress. 1a.) Surveyor observed Resident #52 on 7/22/19 at 9:39. Bilateral side rails were noted in the up position in the middle of the bed and larger than the quarter and assist rails that were observed on the beds of other residents. A review Resident #52's medical record on 7/24/19 at 10:19 AM failed to reveal any documentation of the presence of the side rails…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to revise care plans related to: 1.) a resident's repeated falls; 2.) a resident's visual needs; 3.) pain management and 4.) care plan updates hospitalization. This was evident during the review of 4 of 25 residents (Resident #52, #57, #70, and #43) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1.) Review of the medical record for Resident #52 on 7/22/19 at 12:53 PM revealed a change in condition note on 6/29/19. Further review of Resident #52's medical record revealed diagnoses including; cognitive impairment, degenerative joint disease and dysphasia requiring feeding via a gastrostomy tube. The Director of Nursing (DON) was asked on 7/23/19 for any further falls and investigations related to falls for Resident #52 for the past 6 months. It was noted on 7/26/19 at 9:46 AM that Resident #52 had 2 falls occurring on 6/13/19 and 6/29/19. A review of the care plan failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations of residents, review of medical records and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure residents are provided with activities that meet the resident's needs based on their assessment. This was evident for 1 out of 6 residents (Resident #45) reviewed for activity during the investigation stage of the survey The findings include: On 7/24/19 a review of Resident #45's medical records revealed the resident had been admitted to the facility in March 2019 for rehabilitation and with diagnoses that included high blood pressure, history of falling and stroke. Further review of the medical records revealed that the resident has a daughter who was very involved in the resident's care. A review of the resident's admission preference and activity assessment revealed the assessments had all dashes indicating it was not completed. Review of the instructions for completing the assessment revealed if resident is unable to complete, attempt to complete interview with family member or significant other. Review of the resident's Individual Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility attending physician failed to: 1.) document procedural treatments rendered to a resident and 2.) document an updated and complete assessment of a resident's medication for 11 months. This was evident during the review of 2 of 25 residents (Resident #52 and #70) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1.) Review of the medical record for Resident #52 on 7/22/19 at 9:36 AM revealed treatment orders for a wound. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed weekly notes from LPN #1 or the Assistant Director of Nursing, both with certifications in wound care regarding the wound changes and needs for wound management. Further review of Resident #52's medical record revealed a wound debridement on 3/22/19. Debridement is the removal of unhealthy tissue from a wound to promote healing. It can be done by surgical, chemical, mechanical, or autolytic (using your body's own processes). A physician note from 3/22/19 noted that in plan sacral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to only administer ordered medications. This was evident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #5) observed during the medication administration task during the annual survey. The findings included: On 7/25/19 at 7:50 AM during medication administration observation LPN #11 crushed Resident #5's medications. She then poured a water cup full of MedPass 2.0. When questioned she said Resident #5 is on nectar consistency liquids due to a swallowing problem and the MedPass 2.0 is the same consistency so she uses it for Resident #5 to swallow his/her medications since she doesn't have any liquid thicker on her cart. Liquid thickener just thickens liquids like water or juice and does not add calories or nutritional supplements. LPN #11 then administered the crushed medications and had Resident #5 swallow the cup of MedPass 2.0. MedPass 2.0 is a fortified nutritional shake used to supplement calories and protein to enable weight maintenance or weight gain. MedPass 2.0 requires a physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview , it was determined that the facility had not properly labeled and dated leftover food that was in the refrigerator. This was true of 1 out 2 observations made in the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator. This deficient practice can impact all residents and the facility's infection control practices. Findings include: On 7/25/19 at 10:12 AM a tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Dietary Manager #7. The following items were not dated when the package/container was opened: 1. A box that contained fresh tomatoes. 2. Raw Carrots that were in a 50 lb. bag 3. Raw onions that were in a 50 lb. bag 4. Box of butter blocks Review of the facility food service policy on 7/25/19 revealed that items shall be labeled and dated when put into use. Interview with Dietary Manger #7 on 7/25/19 at 11:44 AM confirmed the facility's policy.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to clean hands between residents during medication pass observation. This was evident for 4 of 6 residents observed during the medication pass task. The findings include: On 7/22/19 during medication pass observation with LPN #11 she passed medications to 4 residents. After completing the medication pass she exited the rooms never washed or used hand sanitizer to her hands. LPN #11 then continued on to the next resident. The facility's administering medications policy states staff shall follow established facility infection control procedures(e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions,etc) for the administration of medications, as applicable. This finding of LPN #11 not cleaning hands was confirmed with the Director of Nursing on 7/24/19 at 1:00 PM.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident and staff interview and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This was evident on 3 out of 4 nursing units and has the ability to impact all residents, staff and visitors in the facility. Findings include: Review of facility pest control reports on 7/25/19 at 9:46 AM revealed the Insect Light trap was not working on the 200 wing on 5/22/19, 6/5/19, 6/19/19, 7/11/19, and 7/17/19 per the pest control contractor for the facility. Observation on an initial tour of the facility revealed flies and small black bugs that were observed coming from under the window air conditioning units and from the base molding on the 300 and 400 resident wings on 7/22/19 at 2:44 PM and 7/23/19 at 11:14 AM Interview with Resident #54 who resided on the 400 wing revealed the fly problem is worse in the hot summer months and mice had been seen in December 2018 and January 2019. Resident #54 revealed on 7/24/19 at 4:10 PM he/she and their daughter had fly swatter contests some evenings to see…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$18,636 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-09-04
  • $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-09-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to KEY HEALTH MANAGEMENT — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 51.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MD4 HOLDCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2023
HIRTH, YECHIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/01/2023
HOWARD, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
WILLIAMS, VICTORIAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/23/2023
AUSCH, SARAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/11/2025
EISEN, MENASHEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/11/2025
KLEIN, YEHUDISIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
PERLSTEIN, BARRYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/11/2025
SCHLUSSEL, NAFTALIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/11/2025
KEY HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$237K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 12%Other / private 13%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $237K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$391per resident / day
operating cost
$11,895per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$364per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Maryland
$12,927/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,173/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215149. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next