Manokin Nursing And Rehab
11974 Edgehill Terrace, Princess Anne, MD 21853 · For profit - Corporation · 135 certified beds · (410) 651-0011 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (100) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,685 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-01)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- about 26% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 30.9% | 20.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 12.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 33.4% | 22.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 26.8% | 22.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.2% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.9% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.6% | 5.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 36.3% | 25.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.1% | 13.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.6% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 31.2% | 80.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.4% | 21.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.0% | 9.8% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.90 | 1.33 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.03 | 1.20 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.5%CMS range 37.8–56.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 7.7–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 79.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.9–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 106.6 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
100 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 85 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by staff for 1 (Resident #3) of 10 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. It was determined the non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, at a scope and severity of J.The IJ began on 02/05/2026 when the Administrator verbally and physically abused Resident #3.The survey team notified the Administrator and Director of Nursing of the IJ and provided the IJ template on 03/24/2026 at 2:17 PM. Beginning 02/12/2026 until 02/24/2026, the facility implemented corrective actions to correct the identified deficient practice and prevent recurrence; thus, immediate jeopardy past non-compliance was cited with a compliance date of 2/24/2026.Findings included:A facility policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of facility reported incident # 2602973, medical records, facility documentation, interview with facility staff, and observation, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) protect a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #50) from physical abuse by a resident (Resident #21) with a known history of verbal and physical aggression towards staff and residents. This was evident for 1 (Resident #50) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse during the annual survey. 2) In a separate occurrence, not Immediate Jeopardy, the facility also failed to prevent resident to resident physical abuse. This was evident for 1 of 3 (Resident #93) reviewed for behaviors during the annual survey. The Maryland Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) determined that the facility's failure to protect a cognitively impaired resident from physical abuse from another resident met the Federal definition of Immediate Jeopardy, and the facility was notified of Immediate Jeopardy at 2:50 PM on 9/25/2025. The facility developed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to remove expired food items and label opened stored food items and in a manner that maintains professional standards of food service safety. This practice had the potential to affect all residents eating food prepared by the facility kitchen. The findings include: Surveyors conducted an initial brief tour of the kitchen on 07/24/2023 with and identified: - Three unopened 6-lb cans of marinara sauce without an expiration date - Five bags of unopened hot dog buns with an expiration date on 07/14/2023 - 50 Resident food trays were rusty around the trim and cracked - 10 Blue domed plate covers, and plate holders, were cracked and missing pieces The surveyor conducted a second tour of the kitchen including the dry storage area on 07/24/2023 at 9:27 AM with cook, Staff #6. During the tour, we observed: - One sealed 52 ounce (oz) can of Red and [NAME] Pepper strips without an expiration date - Elbow macaroni stored in an opened transparent plastic container without an opened date - Egg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical and administrative record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from physical abuse by other residents. The facility's failure to implement adequate interventions for a resident (#79) to prevent recurring resident-to-resident abuse placed residents at risk for serious harm. This finding was evident for 3 of 9 residents (#62, #22, and #6) reviewed for abuse. The Maryland Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ) determined that this concern met the Federal definition of Immediate Jeopardy, and the facility was notified in writing of this determination at 6:08 PM on 8/7/23. On 8/7/23 8:42 PM The facility submitted an abatement plan to remove the immediacy while surveyors were onsite. The abatement plan was accepted by the OHCQ at 8:48 PM on 8/7/23. The findings include: On 08/02/2023 at 7:50 AM the surveyor reviewed the facility's investigation file regarding the incident between Resident #79 and Resident #22 that occurred on 05/27/2023 and the incident that occurred on 6/21/23 between Resident #79 and Resident #62. Review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure adequate supervision while positioning a resident in bed during the provision of care. This deficient practice resulted in harm for Resident #212. This was evident for 1 (#212) of 14 residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: On 08/08/2023, a record review was conducted which revealed that Resident #212 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, left femur fracture, stroke and hemiplegia affecting his/her left non-dominant side. Hemiplegia is a severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) is a screening tool that is utilized to ensure each resident's individual needs are identified. A review of the MDS assessment, with an assessment reference date of 01/17/2023, identified that to turn from side to side and position body when in bed, the resident was totally dependent on staff for the activity and required 2 staff persons…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of complaint 2965994, observations during a dining experience, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that staff failed to sit while feeding residents and failed to serve meals to all seated residents at the same time to provide a dignified dining experience. This was evident on 1 (Chase) of 2 nursing units observed during the dining experience of the complaint survey.The findings include:On 6/29/26 at 11:00 AM a review of complaint 2965994 was conducted regarding alleged concerns over resident care in the facility.On 6/29/26 at 12:38 PM observation on the dementia unit (Chase) noted residents eating lunch at the table adjacent to the nurse's station. Observation was made of Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) #16 standing to feed Resident #9 and Resident #10. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 was standing to feed Resident #11 and Unit Manager #8 was standing to feed Resident #12.On 6/30/26 from 8:27 AM to 8:46 AM a second observation of the dining experience during breakfast was made on the dementia unit.Observation was made of Resident #15 eating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of complaints, observations, and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) provide maintenance services necessary to keep resident rooms and equipment sanitary and orderly and 2) ensure a resident's room was a safe, comfortable and homelike environment. This issue was observed on 3 of 5 nursing units reviewed for maintenance services and 1 of 4 resident rooms reviewed for safe, comfortable and homelike environment during a complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 6/29/26 at 12:20 PM the following environmental observations were made during a tour of the facility: Ceiling Tiles in Disrepair: [NAME] water stains of various sizes were observed on ceiling tiles in rooms 106, 307, and room [ROOM NUMBER]. Plastic plumbing pipes were on the floor and in resident basins in rooms 107, 111, and room [ROOM NUMBER]. Toilet paper rollers were missing from toilet paper holders in rooms 303, 111, and room [ROOM NUMBER]. Bathroom exhaust fans were hanging down from the ceiling in rooms…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of complaint 2965994, observation, and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of disease. This was evident for 3 of 5 nursing units observed during the complaint survey.The findings include: On 6/29/26 at 11:00 AM a review of complaint 2965994 alleged that a visitor to the facility observed dirty meal trays, a dirty towel on the floor with a brown liquid on it and a puddle of dried brown liquid on the floor, a stained pillow, and dried food all over the floor that appeared to have been there for some time. The worker was concerned with the cleanliness of the rooms in the facility. On 6/29/26 at 12:20 PM a tour of the facility was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP) #5. The following infection control concerns were observed:room [ROOM NUMBER]: bathroom: There was 1 gray and 1 pink basin lying on the floor under the sink. The basins were not labeled and were not in plastic.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-01 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of complaint 2965994, observations, interviews, and documentation review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program, evidenced by numerous flies throughout the facility. This was evident on 2 of 2 days observed during a complaint survey.The findings include: On 6/29/26 at 9:35 AM a review of complaint 2965994 alleged concerns regarding the facility's environment.On 6/29/26 at 9:48 AM a tour of the facility was conducted. Observation was made on the dementia unit (Chase) of a fly on the baby doll's head that Resident #14 was holding. There was a fly in the back dining area of the unit and in the 500 hallway.On the 100 hallway in room [ROOM NUMBER] there was a fly buzzing around in the resident's room and a fly sitting on the toilet seat in the resident's bathroom.On 6/29/26 at 12:55 PM a tour was conducted with Infection Preventionist (IP) #5. IP #5 confirmed the facility had a fly problem as there were several flies observed on the tour and in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility reported incident 3044296, documentation review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to report an alleged abuse immediately to the Nursing Home Administrator and within 2 hours to the regulatory agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 1 (Resident #3) of 2 residents reviewed for 2 facility reported incidents during a complaint survey. The findings include:On 6/29/26 at 11:00 AM a review of facility reported incident 3044296 was conducted and revealed Resident #3 alleged that Certified Medicine Aide (CMA) #17 refused to give Resident #3 his/her breakfast tray until Resident #3 took his/her medication. On 6/15/26 at 2:30 PM Resident #3 was interviewed by the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and the Unit Manager (UM). According to the facility report, Resident #3 stated that the incident happened the previous Saturday or Sunday. Review of a written statement from Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #14 documented that he went to see Resident #3 on 6/14/26 at 2:00 PM and the resident informed him that CMA #17…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to administer medications timely. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 4 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include:Review of Complaint 2988557 was conducted on 6/29/26 regarding the timeliness of administration of medications for Resident #6.Review of Resident #6's medical record on 6/29/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in February 2026 with a diagnosis to include Dementia. Dementia is a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life.Review of Resident #6's physician medication orders revealed the Resident was ordered on 2/27/26 Pantoprazole Sodium 40 mg give in the morning for GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease) and Synthroid 75 mcq one time of day for thyroid. Review of Mayo Clinic guidelines on administration of Pantoprazole and Synthroid revealed they are recommended to be given at least 30 minutes before a meal.Review of Resident #6's June 2026…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide treatment/services to prevent/heal pressures ulcers as ordered for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #4) of 3 residents reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A pressure ulcer, also known as pressure sore or decubitus ulcer, is any lesion caused by unrelieved pressure that results in damage to the underlying tissue. Pressure ulcers are staged according the their severity from Stage I (area of persistent redness), Stage II ( superficial loss of skin such as an abrasion, blister or shallow crater), Stage III ( full thickness skin loss involving damage to subcutaneous tissue presenting as a deep crater), Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive damage to muscle, bone or tendon) or Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by slough and/or eschar in the wound bed).Review of a Complaint 3017918 was conducted on 6/29/26 regarding the care of Resident #4.Review of Resident #4's medical record on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-07-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to assess and monitor a resident's nutritional needs and intervene in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition during a complaint survey. The findings include:Review of a Complaint 3017918 was conducted on 6/29/26 regarding the care of Resident #4.Review of Resident #4's medical record on 6/29/26 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in February 2026 with a diagnosis to include muscle wasting and atrophy. Muscle wasting is the wasting or thinning of your muscle mass, often from aging or inactivity. Further review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the facility staff documented Resident #4's weight on admission 2/18/26 was 164 pounds, 3/6/26 173.4 pounds and 4/9/26 178.6 poundsFurther review of Resident #4's weights revealed the facility staff documented the Resident's next weight on 5/20/26 and it was 156.6 pounds.On 5/22/26 the Resident was seen by the Dietitian who documented: Resident has fair to good PO (by mouth) intake,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility reported incident 3044296, complaints 3044605, 3017702, 2980425, medical record review, and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards. This was evident for 3 (Residents #3, #5, #7) of 8 residents reviewed for 9 intakes reviewed on a complaint survey. The findings include: A medical record is the official documentation of a healthcare organization. As such, it must be maintained in a manner that follows applicable regulations, accreditation standards, professional practice standards, and legal standards. All entries to the record should be legible and accurate. 1) On 6/29/26 at 11:00 AM a review of complaint 3044605 and facility reported incident 3044296 were conducted regarding an abuse complaint from Resident #3. Review of complaint 3044605 alleged that Resident #3 stated on 6/8/26 Certified Medicine Aide (CMA) #17 physically assaulted Resident #3. Resident #3 refused to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident abuse was reported to the state survey agency (SSA) within two hours for an allegation involving 1 (Resident #3) of 10 sampled residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included:A facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised 03/25/2025, indicated, Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The policy further revealed, VII. Reporting/Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies (e.g. [exempli gratia, for example], law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes; a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 85 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with facility staff and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker on a full time basis in a facility licensed with more than 120 beds. The facility is licensed for 135 beds. This deficient practice was found to be evident during the facility's recertification/complaint survey and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include:On 9/23/25 at 9:41 AM in an interview with Social Worker Designee (SWD #6) she stated she was not licensed or certified. During the interview she stated she had worked at the facility for 1 year, been in the Social Services position for 5 months, and that prior to this position she was a certified medicine aide.On 9/23/25 at 12:35 PM the surveyor requested SWD #6's degree and credentials qualifying her for the Social Worker position; however, by the exit of the survey team on this day, no documents were provided. On 9/23/25 at 5:25 PM review of SWD #6's employee file revealed an application for the Social Work Designee position. In the Record of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-26 · tag F0941 — widespreadDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with facility staff and review of facility documentation and employee files, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff received mandatory communication training. This was evident for 5 (GNA #3, GNA #18, GNA #22, LPN #33, RN #19) out of 5 direct care staff employees reviewed during the Extended Survey investigation portion of the facility's recertification survey. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents.The findings include:On 9/23/25 at 5:19 PM in an interview with the Human Resources Director (HRD #20), when asked about the training and education provided to facility staff, she stated the facility did not use an online learning platform like Relias. She stated that all new hires (clinical and non-clinical) completed tasks online for their onboarding and showed the surveyor a printed copy from a binder in her office. When asked for clarification of what it meant to complete a task, she stated the staff read the tasks and then signed off when they finished showing they read through all of them. She verified and confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-26 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with facility staff and review of facility documentation and employee files, it was determined that the facility failed to provide mandatory Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement training to staff. This was evident for 7 (GNA #3, GNA #18, GNA #22, LPN #33, RN #19, DA #41, HA #42) out of 7 employees reviewed during the Extended Survey investigation portion of the facility's recertification survey. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents.The findings include:Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) helps long-term care facilities improve the quality of life and care for residents by using a structured, data-driven process to identify issues, address the root causes of problems, and implement solutions. It involves ongoing monitoring, teamwork from all staff levels, and continuous review and revision of plans to ensure a safe, resident-focused environment, and adherence to regulations. As a facility's QAPI program involves input and collaboration from all staff, the term staff includes all new and existing facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to treat residents with dignity. This was evident for 2 (#214, #97) of 27 residents that resided on the memory care unit and for 13 residents on the memory care unit that were in the dining/activity area on 1 of 3 days observed during a revisit survey. The findings include:On 12/1/25 from 1:30 PM to 2:20 PM observation was made on the Chase memory care unit of 13 residents sitting in the dining/activity area of the unit. There were no activities at the time. There was no music on, the television screen was on with a still photo of channels and there was no sound. One resident was crying, and one resident was complaining. None of the residents had any type of activity such as books, coloring books, music, videos, or any type of interaction with the staff on the unit. The residents were sitting and staring at each other. There were 5 nursing staff members standing and sitting around the nurse's station. Resident #213 said to the surveyor, they won't turn the tv on and that bothers me.After…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for the residents, this was evident for 2 of 3 units observed during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include,On 9/22/2025 at 9:39 AM during the initial tour of the facility, observations were made of the following rooms/bathrooms:RM 200: The bedroom door was scraped up all the way to the handle and needed replacement covers.room [ROOM NUMBER]B: the wall trim at the head of the bed was missing from bed A to bed B. Also observed behind the head of the bed on the B-side were lots of paint scrapings on the wall.room [ROOM NUMBER]: The bathroom door had holes about 6 x 5 inches long; there were paint scraps on the wall opposite the toilet measuring about 12 x 5 inches. The wood on the bathroom door was scraped off towards the bottom section in two areas measuring about 3 x 2 and 7x 5 inches long.room [ROOM NUMBER]A: The wall paint by the bed was peeled off about 10 x 9 inches, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide appropriate care to residents when they had abnormally elevated blood pressure (BP). This was evident in 1 (Resident #6) out of the 45 residents reviewed for their care during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 9/22/25 at 2:38 PM, the review of Resident #6's medical record revealed that the resident had transferred to the hospital on 8/13/25 due to elevated blood pressure; the systolic blood pressure went over 200 mm Hg.Further review of Resident #6's vital signs from 8/14/25 to 9/23/25 revealed that the resident had elevated blood pressure, with systolic BP measured over 190 mm Hg, 14 times during the period. The highest record was 215/88 mm Hg on 9/12/25. However, there was no documentation to support that Resident #6's medical conditions were notified to the physician or that specific care was provided to the resident related to managing the symptoms.During an interview with Staff #13 (Licensed Practical Nurse) on 9/23/25 at 11:35 AM, she stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-26 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of employee files and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct required performance reviews of Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNAs) at least once every 12 months. This was found to be evident for 2 (GNA #3, GNA #18 ) out of 2 GNA employee files reviewed during the Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing facility task for the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:Performance reviews are to be completed for each GNA at least every 12 months to identify specific, in-service education based on the outcome of those individual performance reviews. On 9/24/25 at 9:38 AM GNA #3's employee file was reviewed. The review revealed she was hired on 1/19/24; however, failed to reveal a performance review was conducted in 2025. On 9/24/2025 at 9:48AM GNA #18's employee file was reviewed. The review revealed she was hired on 11/7/05; however, failed to reveal a performance review was conducted in 2023 or 2024. On 9/24/25 at 1:44 PM an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure that drug records were maintained in a manner that allowed for reconciliation of dispensed and administered medication, and 2) complete controlled medication counts with two nurses. This was evident for four (Resident #44, #79, #96, #35) out of the six residents reviewed for administration of narcotic medication during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:A Controlled Medication Utilization Record (count sheet) is a form used to record controlled medication dispense. It documents the details for each use of any controlled substance amount removed from its original container, including the date, time, the dose given, the signature of the nurse administering the medication, the amount remaining, the amount wasted, and the signature of the individual who checked.A shift count sheet in a nursing home is a form used at the end of a nursing shift to document the inventory of controlled substances, particularly narcotics, ensuring accuracy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to date and label drugs when opened with an open date. This was evident for 3 of 6 medication carts reviewed on the nursing units during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 9/24/2025 at 8:36 AM, the medicine (Med) cart on the short hall was reviewed with staff #12 a License practical Nurse (LPN) and staff #11 a unit manager and revealed medications opened with no dates on them to indicate when they were opened. These medications include:1-Fluticasone Propionate (Flonase) nasal spray 50mg-2-Clopatadine drops-Pataday 0.1%According to the manufacturer's instruction, open bottles of Flonase nasal spray which is used to treat seasonal allergies should be discarded after 2 months or when the number of sprays indicated on the bottle has been used or whichever comes first. This is due to reduced effectiveness and contamination risks. Also, the Clopatadine (olopatadine)eye dops use to treat allergic reactions should be discarded after 4 weeks (28 days) per manufacturer's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to 1) ensure food items were stored under sanitary conditions by labeling and dating food items and 2) maintain proper freezer temperature for food items on the units. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who consume food in the facility and was evident during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:1) On 09/21/2025 at 8:29 AM during the kitchen tour with the food service director (Staff #25), the surveyor observed the following items in the freezer that were not labeled: a bag of fish, sliced cheese in a container, 1-gallon open jars of ranch dressing, golden Italian dressing, creamy [NAME] dressing, and BBQ sauce.During an interview with Staff #25 on 9/21/2025 at 8:31 AM, when asked about labeling of food items, he/she stated that items are labeled with a receive date and a use by date. Staff #25 stated that the items observed should have been labeled. Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program and the staff failed to follow infection control practices and guidelines to prevent the development and transmission of disease by failing to complete tuberculosis (TB) screening for newly admitted residents. This was evident for 4 (Resident #17, #8, #3, and #77) of five residents for TB screening during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:Tuberculosis (TB) is a disease caused by germs that are spread from person to person through the air. Each resident must have a health assessment upon admission, including significant past or present infectious diseases and signs and symptoms of tuberculosis (TB).Skin tests should be administered to all new residents and employees as soon as their residency or employment begins unless they have documentation of a previous positive reaction. A two-step procedure (administering 2nd skin test within 1-3 weeks) is advisable for the initial testing of residents and employees. Each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to assess and document residents' vaccination status for influenza and pneumococcal vaccines and failed to provide education regarding the benefits and risks of the vaccines. This was evident for two (Resident #17 and #3) of the five residents reviewed for immunizations during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:The pneumococcal vaccine helps prevent pneumococcal disease, which is any type of illness caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends a pneumococcal vaccine for adults age [AGE] years or older and adults 19 through [AGE] years old with certain medical conditions or risk factors. (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Vaccines and Preventable Disease)Influenza (Flu) is a contagious disease that spreads around the United States every year, usually between October and May. Anyone can get the flu, but it is more dangerous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-26 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to maintain residents' and staff's COVID-19 vaccination status in their medical records. This was evident for five (Resident #3, #8, #17, #27, and #77) of 5 residents and one (Staff #19) out of five facility staff members reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations status during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:1) Resident RecordsOn 9/24/25, at 3:27 PM, the surveyor randomly selected five residents to review their immunization status. The review revealed Resident #3, #8, #17, #27, and #77 did not have their COVID-19 vaccination status in their medical records.During an interview with Staff #23 (Infection Preventionist) on 9/24/25 at 4:05 PM, she stated that the facility staff should maintain residents' COVID-19 vaccination status and update them in the medical records.In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/24/25 at 4:53 PM, the surveyor reviewed residents' immunization records with her. The DON verified that there was no information for COVID-19 vaccination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the kitchen's freezer was in working order. This was evident during a revisit survey.The findings include:On 12/1/25 at 10:43 AM a tour of the kitchen was conducted. In the freezer, which was accessed through the refrigerator, observation was made as the door was opened of plastic curtain sleeves that had significant ice and frost build-up and ice build-up on the door. There were chunks of ice approximately 6 inches by 2 inches on the floor and 8 inches by 2 inches going up the poles of the storage carts. There were small mounds of ice built up on the ceiling above the compressor fans. There was ice on top of boxes that were stored in the freezer. The surveyor had the Dietary Manager, Staff #38 come into the freezer to confirm the findings. Staff #38 stated that they had the freezer worked on a month or two ago. He said he would call the company to come look at it. On 12/2/25 at 11:45 AM an interview was conducted with Staff #6, the maintenance director who stated, I was made aware of the freezer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observations, interviews with residents and facility staff, and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program. This was found to be evident during the facility's recertification survey.The findings include:During the survey several observations were made of flies and gnats in the building. On the first day of the survey on 9/22/25 at 8:35 AM, surveyors were placed in the facility's conference room with multiple gnats and flies observed in the room. Throughout the survey conducted from 9/22/25 through 9/25/25, there were observations made each day of gnats and flies in the conference room and hallways of the facility. On 9/22/25 at 8:39 AM the surveyor observed flies flying around in the dining room.On 9/23/25 at 2:35 PM the surveyor observed several flies flying around room [ROOM NUMBER] and landing on Resident #72. When asked if flies were an issue s/he stated, Yes, that white thing [pointed to the wall behind…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-26 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with facility staff and review of facility documentation and employee files, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff received compliance and ethics training. This was evident for 5 (GNA #18, GNA #22, RN #19, DA #41, HA #42) out of 7 employees reviewed during the Extended Survey investigation portion of the facility's recertification survey. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents.The findings include:On 9/23/25 at 5:19 PM in an interview with the Human Resources Director (HRD #20), when asked about the training and education provided to facility staff, she stated the facility does not use an online learning platform like Relias. She stated that all new hires (clinical and non-clinical) completed tasks online for their onboarding and showed the surveyor a printed copy from a binder in her office. When asked for clarification of what it meant to complete a task, she stated the staff read the tasks and then signed off when they finished showing they read through all of them. She verified and confirmed there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor review of the clinical record and interviews it was determined that facility staff failed to honor the wishes of the guardian of Resident #21. This finding was evident for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:Review of the clinical record for Resident #21 revealed an order of court -consent that ordered [NAME] County Department of social Services as guardian of person for Resident #21. Review of the clinical record for Resident #21 revealed a discharge form dated 9/26/25. The form documented for the signature of the patient/representative verbal consent.Further review of the clinical record for Resident #21 revealed a discharge planning instruction sheet completed on 9-26-25, that documented under the person receiving instructions verbal consent with the initials of a staff member. Under Relationship to the Resident, it was documented facility staff member.Review of the clinical record revealed no evidence that a 30 day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and interview with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to inform the responsible party on three separate dates when a new medication was ordered for a resident. This was evident for 1 (Resident #72) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the facility's recertification survey.The findings include:The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) defines a psychotropic medication in the regulations at S483.45(c)(3), as any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior (CMS, 2023). These drugs include, but are not limited to, drugs in the following categories: anti-psychotic, anti-depressant, anti-anxiety, and hypnotic medications. These medications can have serious potential risks, including side effects, drug interactions, and the possibility of neuroleptic malignant syndrome (a rare but potentially life-threatening condition) or tardive dyskinesia (a movement disorder that can develop if you take an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility staff failed to notify the physician and the responsible party in a timely manner of a resident's significant change in condition. This was evident for Resident #113, one of the three closed records reviewed during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:Agonal breathing is an abnormal, involuntary reflex that signals a severe medical emergency, such as cardiac arrest. It is not effective breathing and cannot sustain life. Though the person is still alive, this reflex indicates that the brain is not receiving enough oxygen and that death is imminent without immediate intervention.On 9/23/25 at 8:10 AM, the surveyor reviewed the three system-selected residents for the closed records review. The review revealed the following:7/16/25 at 11:03 AM: A nurse wrote a progress note stating, Resident has agonal breathing, RR (respiration rate) is 4, does not appear to be in any pain or discomfort, care continues. 7/19/25 at 2:55 AM: A progress note was written by the ADON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview with residents and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency, the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ), in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 72) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:The OHCQ is the agency within the Maryland Department of Health charged with monitoring the quality of care in Maryland's health care facilities and community-based programs. Allegations of abuse are to be reported to the OHCQ in a timely manner (within 2 hours for the initial report and within 5 working days for the final report).On 9/22/25 at 9:16 AM in an interview with Resident #72 s/he stated s/he felt abused whenever the aides (Geriatric Nursing Assistants, GNAs) yell at her, which happens at least once a week. During the interview s/he stated, They just push and push when trying to clean me up or give me a bath in my bed. Instead of saying would you please do this, they just grab me and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor review of the clinical record and interviews it was determined that facility staff failed to appropriately discharge Resident #21. This finding was evident for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for behaviors during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:Review of the clinical record for Resident #21 revealed an order of court -consent that ordered [NAME] County Department of social Services as guardian of person for Resident #21. Review of the clinical record for Resident #21 revealed a discharge form dated 9/26/25. The form documented for the signature of the patient/representative verbal consent.Further review of the clinical record for Resident #21 revealed a discharge planning instruction sheet completed on 9-26-25, that documented under the person receiving instructions verbal consent with the initials of a staff member. Under Relationship to the Resident, it was documented facility staff memberReview of the clinical record forResident #21 revealed no evidence that a 30 day…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor review of the clinical record and interviews it was determined that facility staff failed to provide the guardian of Resident #21 with a notice of transfer or discharge 30 days prior to the transfer or discharge. This finding was evident for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for behavior during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:Review of the clinical record for Resident #21 revealed an order of court -consent that ordered [NAME] County Department of social Services as guardian of person for Resident #21. Review of the clinical record for Resident #21 revealed a discharge form dated 9/26/25. The form documented for the signature of the patient/representative verbal consent.Further review of the clinical record for Resident #21 revealed a discharge planning instruction sheet completed on 9-26-25, that documented under the person receiving instructions verbal consent with the initials of a staff member. Under Relationship to the Resident, it was documented facility staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented. This was found to be evident for 2 (Residents #3 and #4) out of 6 residents reviewed for care plans during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:1) On 09/22/2025 at 11:20 AM, Resident #4 stated that he/she was getting antibiotics but did not know for how long. Medical record review on 09/24/2025 at 11:08 AM noted an order written on 6/20/2025 to give Cephalexin 500 mg capsule, one capsule by mouth twice daily for UTI for 6 days. Additional orders found for Ketoconazole 2 % Cream, apply topically to facial rash twice a day for seborrheic dermatitis, and Triamcinolone Acetonide 0.1 % Cream apply topically to right leg rash twice daily for stasis dermatitis written on 6/22/2025. There was no care plan documented for the focus, goal, or intervention for the use of these medications.An interview was conducted on 09/24/2025 at 11:49 AM with the Infection Preventionist (IP) Staff #23 who stated that part of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of resident medical records and interviews with facility staff, it was determined that the facility failed to hold interdisciplinary team care plan meetings for residents concurrent with their quarterly care plan revisions. This deficiency was observed in 2 (Resident #88 and #10) of 2 residents reviewed for care plan meetings during this recertification/complaint survey. The findings include: Care plans are essential guides for the care residents receive within the facility. They must be developed within seven days of a resident's comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and revised at least quarterly (or more frequently as needed). The facility is required to have these care plans developed and revised by an interdisciplinary team, which includes the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nursing aide, a representative from dietary services, the resident, and the resident's representative, as practicable. 1) On 9/23/25 at 11:01 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #88's medical records. The review revealed that the resident was re-admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview with staff, and medical record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide the level of assistance needed with feeding for dependent residents. This was evident for 3 (Resident #50, #55, and #97) of 7 residents reviewed for Nutrition during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) is a term used collectively to describe fundamental skills required to independently care for oneself, such as eating, bathing, and mobility.1)On 09/22/2025 at 12:22 PM, during a phone interview with the complainant for Resident #50, concerns were expressed regarding Resident #50 eating with his/her fingers.On 09/23/2025 at 8:16 AM during a dining observation, Resident #50 was observed eating breakfast at a table in the dining area. The meal consisted of oatmeal and ground meat, which Resident #50 was eating with his/her fingers. Only a fork and knife were present on the meal tray, and no staff member was present assisting Resident #50 with the meal.On 09/23/2025 at 9:55 AM, in a review of Resident # 50's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide 1 to 1 resident-centered activities to improve or maintain the resident's mental and psychosocial well-being. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 3) of 6 residents reviewed for activities during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:During the screening phase of the survey on 9/22/2025 at 10:15 AM when surveyor asked Resident #3 if he/she participated in activities, resident stated, you tell me. The surveyor asked if activities are done in the room, resident stated, no.On 9/22/2025 at 1:12 PM, Resident #3 was observed in bed with the television off. When surveyor asked if he/she were engaged in any bedside activity, the resident stated no.A record review of the care plan on 9/23/2025 at 11:46 AM, noted that the resident is dependent on staff for activities, meeting emotional, physical, social needs related to (if dependent) Immobility, Physical Limitations, and that the resident needed 1:1 bedside/in-room visits and activities if unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medications were not left unattended on the locked unit. This was evident for 1 (#10) out of 45 residents that were part of the survey sample during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 9/22/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed the room of Resident #10 which was located on the locked unit which houses residents with some form of dementia and/or a psychiatric diagnosis. On the bedside table was an open bottle of Greer's goo (a compound medication to treat skin irritation and to act as a moisture barrier), a near empty container of Greer's goo on nightstand with a do not use past 9/4/25 date, and another container of Greer's goo on the nightstand as well. This surveyor told Staff #3 (a geriatric nursing assistant - GNA) on 9/22/25 at 9:08 AM about the findings and showed her what was observed. She said the nurse must have done a treatment earlier. She then said she would move the creams. This surveyor interviewed Staff #14 (the nurse on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review and interviews. It was determined that the facility failed to label and date oxygen tubing to indicate when it was last changed. This was evident for 2 (Residents #66 and #41) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 9/22/25 at 8:30 AM and 8:42AM during the initial round on the unit, Residents #66 and #41 were observed in their respective rooms, both residents were receiving oxygen (O2) via a nasal cannula (NC) which is a tubing used to deliver oxygen to the nares. The NC was connected to an O2 humidifier, a medical device that provides supplemental O2 at the bedside. Continuous observation revealed that both O2 tubing were not labelled with a date to indicate when they were last changed.A second observation was made on 9/23/2025 at 1:19 PM. Resident #66 was sitting in the A/B day room with two family members with a portable O2 tank, the O2 tubing was not labelled with a change dated. Review of the physician's orders on 9/24/25 at 13:00 PM revealed an order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the physician failed to enter progress notes and order medications in a timely manner for a resident (Resident #6). This was evident for 1 of 3 residents reviewed during a revisit survey.The findings include:Review of Resident #6's medical record on 12/2/25 revealed the Resident was admitted to the facility in 2021 with diagnosis to include hypertension. Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is a condition where the force of blood against artery walls is consistently too high, which can lead to serious health problems like heart attack and stroke.Further review of Resident #6's medical record revealed the last physician/nurse practitioner note was on 10/20/25.During interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/3/25 at 8:15 AM, the DON confirmed there are no physician/nurse practitioner notes for Resident #6 since 10/20/25. The DON stated she contacted the Physician (Staff #31) and the Physician stated he had seen the Resident in November but had not put in the progress note in the medical record yet.After Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a medical record review and interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to monitor and document residents' behavior for those who had mental disorders. This was evident for one (Resident #11) of the three residents reviewed for behavioral issues during this recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 9/24/25 at 10:12 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #11's medical records. The review revealed that the resident was admitted in April 2025 with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. The resident had been administered several medications for the mental disorder, including those addressing symptoms of verbal or physical aggression. However, there was no order for behavior monitoring.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/24/25 at 1:53 PM, she confirmed that Resident #11 had several mental disorders, including aggressive behavior. The surveyor asked the DON about the care for residents who had behavior issues. She stated the facility nursing staff should monitor their behaviors and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, interview with facility staff and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed and documented on the monthly pharmacy reviews and responded to the recommendations made by consulting pharmacists in a timely manner. This was evident for 1 (Resident #72) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:The Medication Regimen Review (MRR) is a thorough review of the medication regimen (plan) of a resident with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse (negative) consequences and potential risks associated with medications. The MRR must be completed at least once a month by a licensed pharmacist and includes a review of the medical record to identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, errors, and/or other irregularities. Irregularity refers to use of medication that is inconsistent with accepted standards of practice for providing pharmaceutical services, not supported by medical evidence,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident received medication as ordered. This was evident for 1 (Resident #10) out of the 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the recertification/complaint survey. The findings include:A review of Resident #10's clinical record was conducted on 09/23/2025 at 1:35 PM. It was revealed that the resident's primary physician ordered on 5/22/25 Acetaminophen 325 mg to be administered with two tablets every six hours as needed for mild pain (1-3). The resident told staff that they had pain that was rated as 6 on 9/4/25, as 8 on 9/7/25, and as 10 on 9/22/25. There was no evidence that the physician was contacted with instructions on how to address pain levels higher than the 1-3 reflected in the orders for the first two incidents of pain rated greater than 3. The physician wrote an order on 9/10/25 for Tramadol 50 mg to be administered by mouth every 8 hours as needed for severe pain (7-10) for 14 days. This medication was not administered at all even on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, review of the medical record, and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to screen/evaluate a resident for rehabilitative services. This was evident for 1 (Resident #72) of 2 reviewed for Rehab and Restorative services during the facility's recertification survey. The findings include:On 9/22/25 at 9:31 AM in an interview with Resident #72 s/he stated, I am supposed to get therapy, and they do not give it to me. Review of Resident #72's medical record on 9/22/25 at 1:35 PM revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease, muscle weakness (generalized), abnormal posture, and muscle wasting and atrophy.On 9/22/25 at 9:18 PM review of Resident #72's medical record revealed, Care Plan Conference Summary dated 7/3/25. In the Summarize Discussion of Care Plan Conference section it had documented, Family would like some type of therapy ordered for her. Goal is for [Resident #72's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain a medical record in the most accurate form. This was evident for 1 (Resident #100) of 6 residents reviewed for medical record accuracy during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:During a record review on 09/23/2025 at 09:20 AM of a Facility Reported Incident, it was noted that Resident #100 had an Emergency Petition (EP) transfer to the hospital for suicidal ideation on 9/9/2025. Upon further review of the record, the surveyor found a progress note dated 9/17/2025 documented as This visit was conducted with the use of an interactive audio and video telecommunication system with real-time communication between the patient and the provider. On 09/23/2025 at 9:23 AM, an interview with the unit manager, Staff #11 revealed that the resident was not in the facility on 9/17/2025 and could not explain why that progress note was written in the resident's medical record.An interview was conducted on 09/23/2025 at 10:17 AM with the medical record director, Staff # 7. When…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-26 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record reviews and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to have key essential personnel present during their monthly quality assurance (QA) meetings. This was evident during a review of the facilities quality assurance program activities during the recertification/complaint survey.The findings include:On 9/26/2025 at 11:02 AM the surveyors requested for the January to August of 2025 quality assurance (QA) monthly meeting sign in sheet from the facility.Review of the QA agenda/meeting sign in sheet from January to August 2025 on 9/26/25 at 11:10 AM revealed that in the months of July and August, certain key personnel did not attend the monthly meetings. For instance, in the month of July, the medical director, the social worker and the Infection preventionist were absent during the meeting and in the month of August the social worker, dietitian and the infection preventionist did not attend the meeting.On 9/26/2025 at 11:20 AM in an interview with the nursing home administrator who oversees QA. He was asked if he was aware that certain key…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to protect resident property and provide a safe environment by not maintaining an inventory of resident belongings and not investigating a lost item for one Resident (R28) of three sampled residents. The findings included: Record review of the resident and family grievances policy facility's dated 02/06/2024, showed the following: It is the policy of the facility to support each resident's and family members' right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal or fear of discrimination or reprisal. The policy documented the facility social worker has been designated as the Grievance Official and backup is the Administrator. The Grievance Official is responsible for overseeing the grievance process receiving and tracking grievance through to their conclusion; leading any necessary investigation by the facility, maintaining the confidentiality of all information associated with grievance; issuing written guidance decisions to the resident; and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of R35's face sheet showed an admission was dated 07/20/2022; diagnoses included Generalized anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, and Major depressive disorder. R35's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03/15 indicating cognition was severely cognitively impaired. R35 care plan initiated 07/20/20/2022 documented the resident had Activities of daily Living (ADL) self- care deficit due to Alzheimer's. The care plan directed the staff to assist the resident with bathing and grooming. Record review of R35 nurse's notes dated 10/20/2023, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)36 documented it was reported to her that R35 smacked GNA37 in the face and then GNA37 hit R35 back. LPN36 reported this information to the former administrator. The Medical Doctor (MD) stated he was going to see R35 the next day for assessment and readjust medications. The responsible party was contacted and notified of the R35 incident and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement intervention to prevent multiple falls for one Resident (R31) of 3 sampled residents who was at high risk for falls. Findings included: Record review of R31's face sheet showed an original admission was dated 12/13/2018; diagnoses included severe intellectual disabilities, major depressive disorder, restlessness, and agitation. R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated that the resident had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision-making. R31's functional limitation in range of motion was impaired on both sides of upper extremity and lower extremity. The resident was dependent on staff with toileting hygiene and personal hygiene. R31 care plan initiated 04/04/2019 documented the resident was at risk and had potential for falls due to limited mobility, cognition decline due to severe Intellectual Disability (ID). The care plan directed the staff to place a bed against wall-per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of the facility policies, review of medical record, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify a resident's physician when a resident had fallen and received an injury to the head. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A review of facility reported incident MD00195570 on 08/17/23 revealed an allegation Resident #1 had been observed with a hematoma to the forehead and a black eye on 08/12/23. A review of Resident #1's medical record on 08/17/23 at 9 AM revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a Hospice, 5-day respite stay. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that include: a history of falls, dementia, bone density and structure disorders, and hypertension. Further review of Resident #1's medical record revealed nursing progress notes indicating that on 08/11/23 at 2:20 AM, LPN #1 observed Resident #1 fall out of his/her wheelchair onto the floor hitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on complaint, reviews of the facility policies and a medical record, as well as staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to initiate a neurological assessment when a resident fell and was observed with a head injury. This was evident for 1 (Resident #1) reviewed during a complaint survey. The findings include: A review of facility reported incident MD00195570 on 08/17/23 revealed an allegation Resident #1 had been observed with a hematoma to the forehead and a black eye on 08/12/23. A review of Resident #1's medical record on 08/17/23 at 9 AM revealed that Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for a Hospice, 5-day respite stay. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that include: a history of falls, dementia, bone density and structure disorders, and hypertension. Further review of Resident #1's medical record revealed nursing progress notes indicating that on 08/11/23 at 2:20 AM, LPN #1 observed Resident #1 fall out of his/her wheelchair onto the floor hitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the infection line lists were updated and proper hand hygiene was performed during a medication administration. This was evident for 3 of 3 monthly line lists reviewed and 2 (#13, #12) out of 2 staff observed for hand hygiene during medication administration. The findings include: A Line List is a detailed list used by a team of clinicians to identify, track, and monitor suspected infections to ensure appropriate treatments. Information that can be gathered from the line list include, but are not limited to, residents, their locations, types of infections, dates of onsets, organisms, antibiotic resistance, antibiotics prescribed, classification, and dates resolved. It is an integral part of the infection surveillance process. 1) On 08/03/2023 at 9:30 AM the facility line lists, also called monthly infection control logs, were obtained from the Infection Control Preventionist (IP). There were 3 pages for the month of May, 3 pages for the month of June, and 2 pages for the month of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a homelike environment. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 10 rooms (# 100 and # 102) observed during the tour of the Antioch Nursing Unit. The findings include: During the initial tour of the Antioch Nursing Unit conducted on 07/24/23 at 9:45 AM, the surveyors observed water stained ceiling tiles in resident rooms # 100 and #102. The residents who resided in those rooms confirmed that when it rained, the ceiling leaked, and the ceiling tiles would become wet and stained. During an interview conducted on 07/24/2023 at 11:00 AM, the Maintenance Director stated that the roof leaked and needed repair. However, until the repairs are made the procedure is to replace the ceiling tiles that were water stained. The surveyor advised the Maintenance Director of the findings in resident rooms #100 and #102. On 07/26/23 at 9:33 AM, a tour was conducted on the Antioch Nursing Unit. The tour…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide pharmaceutical services that met the needs of the residents. This was evident for 1 (#162) out of 68 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: An investigation of intake #MD00189012 was initiated on 8/3/23. A review of Resident #162's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. A review of the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed the resident was ordered several medications that were ordered to be administered starting on 1/15/23 but were not administered until 1/16/23. Some of these medications were available in the pharmacy interim box meaning the nursing staff could have taken the medications from this box and administered them to the resident but nursing staff instead chose otherwise. Medications that were ordered to be started on 1/15/23 but not administered until 1/16/23 even though they were in the interim box: Lasix 40 mg (diuretic), Eliquis 5 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on recorded review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to have monthly medication regimen reviews by a licensed pharmacist and failed to have a process in place to ensure the medication irregularity reports were part of the resident's medical record. This was found evident of 2 of 5 (Resident # 74 & #62) residents reviewed for medication regimen review during a Medicare/Medicaid recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. The MRR also involves collaborating with other members of the Inter Disciplinary Team (IDT), including the resident, their family, and/or resident representative. 1a) On 7/31/23 at 12:23 PM, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of medication administration it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure medications were administered in a safe, appropriate, and timely manner. This was evident for 5 medications out of 31 administered. The findings include: Medication is to be administered according to the five rights of medication administration: right person, right medication, right route, right dosage, and right time. This surveyor observed Staff #12, Staff #10, and Staff #13 administer medications. The observations took place on 7/28/23, and 8/1/23. On 7/28/23 at 10:16 AM Staff #10 was observed administering medication to Resident #12. The resident was to be administered aspirin 81 mg (pain reliever), critical care supplement 30 cc, Omeprazole 20 mg (reduces stomach acid), Potassium Chloride 20 milliequivalents (supplement to treat low potassium levels), and Senna 8.6 mg (laxative) at 8:00 AM. Medication is to be administered within one hour of the medication time. The Administrator, Acting Administrator, and the Director of Nursing were interviewed on 8/4/23 at 12:45 PM.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of the facility's policies it was determined that the facility failed to have a qualified, full-time social worker employed to oversee the social service duties. This was found evident of 4 months in 2022 and 2 months in 2023. The findings include: On 8/1/23 at 10:16 AM, the surveyor interviewed Social Worker Assistant Staff #4. During that interview, Staff #4 explained that the social service department sets up care plan meetings after the resident has a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment and stated the needs of the residents are addressed at those meetings. The surveyor asked Staff #4 to explain the process for addressing an identified dental need of a resident. Staff #4 explained, if a resident was assessed to have a dental need the Social Worker would follow up with the resident. If the resident did not have an established Dentist, then the facility would offer the resident to register with a provider that services dental needs within the facility. Staff #4 stated, currently the facility uses an contracter/consultant, who offers dental, as well as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure clarity regarding whether Advance Directives had been formulated by a resident. This was evident for 1 (#25) of 6 residents reviewed for Advance Directives during the annual survey. The findings include: Advance Directives are legal documents that provide instructions for medical care and only go into effect if you cannot communicate your own wishes. On 07/24/2023 at 1:05 PM, a clinical record review revealed that there were no Advance Directives in Resident #25's chart (clinical record). Contained within the chart was a document entitled Advance Directive Acknowledgement. The document had been signed on 06/11/2020. At the bottom of this document was a prompt which read: PLEASE CHECK ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS:. Provided were two options to check; I HAVE executed an Advance Directive or I HAVE NOT executed an Advance Directive. On Resident #25's document not only was the first option checked, but handwritten in was a third, ad-hoc option, pending, which was also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident had baseline care plans created and initiated for a resident. This was evident for 1 (#162) out of 68 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: A baseline care plan must be prepared for all residents within 48 hours of a resident's admission. Its purpose is to provide the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident until a comprehensive care plan can be completed for the resident. The baseline care plan, along with a copy of their medications, is given to the resident and details a variety of components of the care that the facility intends to provide to that resident. This allows residents and their representatives to be more informed about the care that they receive. An investigation into intake #MD00189012 was initiated by the survey team on 8/3/23. The clinical record review revealed an absence of baseline care plans. The resident had Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, macular degeneration (affects eye site), was on an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that activities were provided that met a resident's needs. This was evident for 1 (#32) of 5 residents reviewed for activities during the annual survey. The findings include: On 07/24/2023 at 1:18 PM, 07/25/2023 at 10:00 AM, 07/25/2023 at 1:00 PM, and 07/27/2023 at 10:03 AM, Resident #32 was observed lying in his/her bed. The resident was not engaged in any individual activities nor were any facility staff engaging him/her in a 1:1 activity. On 07/27/2023 at 9:27 AM, Staff #8, the Activities Director (AD), was interviewed regarding activities for Resident #32. The AD stated, the Activities Aids will do 1:1s with [him/her], devotionals, short stories, anything that meets [his/her] interest. When asked to see the logbook where the 1:1 visits were recorded, the AD picked up a binder. It was discovered that there were no 1:1 visits logged for the resident. The AD commented they should be recording 1:1 visits. On 07/28/2023 at 10:32, an interview was conducted with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident and staff interviews, observations, and medical record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a resident with a multi podus boot, as ordered. This was evident for 1 (#92) of 2 residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The findings include: A Multi Podus Boot is a protective brace that corrects foot misalignments and minimizes the chance of skin breakdown. On 07/24/2023 at 11:55 AM, Resident #92 was interviewed regarding issues with positioning and mobility. The resident stated that he/she needs a brace for the right leg. It was observed that the resident was not wearing a brace on either foot at the time. A subsequent record review revealed that there was a physician's order for Resident #92 to wear multi podus boot at all times while in bed except for during care for positioning and pain management. The order had been active since 9/22/2022. On 07/31/2023 at 9:15 AM, it was observed that Resident #92 was not wearing a multi podus boot. The resident stated, the doctor and nurses have mentioned it, nobody does anything. Before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that medication carts were locked and secured. This was evident for 1 of 3 nursing units. The findings are: 1. This surveyor observed on 7/24/23 at 1:40 PM the medication cart parked across from the Antioch conference room was left unlocked. Two staff members walked past the cart and did not lock the medication cart. No residents were observed in the area. A third staff member, Staff #1, walked by at 1:44 PM and put her right hand behind her back and locked it. Staff #1 was interviewed on 7/24/23 at 1:48 PM. She was informed of the observation. She confirmed that she locked the cart and verbally informed the nurse responsible. 2. This surveyor observed on 7/31/23 at 11:45 AM the medication cart parked across from the Antioch conference room was left unlocked. Staff #1 was walking up the hallway and observed the unlocked and unattended medication cart. She locked the cart and spoke with Staff #10 at 11:47 AM.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide routine dental services identified as need for a resident. This was found evident of 1 of 5 (Resident #91) residents reviewed for dental concern during an annual and complaint survey. The findings include: On 7/24/23 at 1:08 PM, the surveyor observed Resident# 91 eating at his/her bedside. Resident # 91 had both front teeth missing. On 7/31/23 at 1:29 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident # 91's medical record. The record revealed Resident # 91 had been admitted in May of 2022 and had a past medical history that included, paranoid schizophrenia and dementia. Further review of the medial record revealed a care plan created on 5/10/2022 stating resident has potential for oral discomfort due to broken or carious teeth. The interventions included; Coordinate arrangement for dental care. On 7/31/23 at 1:50 PM, the surveyor reviewed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments. The MDS assessment, with a date of May 16th 2022, had box D checked on the Oral/Dental Status. The description of box D…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to keep complete and accurate medical records. This was found evident of 2 of 68 (Resident #106 and #66) residents reviewed during a recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/31/23 at 12:39 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #106's medical record. There review revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 8/1/23 at 10:40 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #106's physician's assessment note dated 4/25/23. This note was located in the miscellaneous section in the medical record. Further review of this section revealed a physician's assessment note dated 3/27/23 for a person with the same first name but different last name. On 8/1/23 at 10:54 AM, the surveyor asked the Acting Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) for clarification of the two assessment notes with different names in Resident #106's medical record. The NHA stated she would look into the issue and follow up. On 8/2/23 at 7:50…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0882 — isolatedDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Control Preventionist (IP), who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, to be responsible for the facility's Infection Control and Prevention program. This was evident for 1 of 1 staff member reviewed for IP credentials. The findings include: On 08/02/2023 at 9:55 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff #11, the facility designated IP. Per the IP, she had been working as the IP for the past 90 days and had received her certification within 2 weeks of starting the position. A copy of her certificate was requested at the time of the interview. On 08/03/2023 at 9:40 AM, the IP submitted records for review. A review of the records revealed that the IP had provided a copy of her transcripts for the IP course, however, there was no certificate of completion. This was brought to the attention of the Interim Nursing Home Administrator, who indicated she was already aware. On 08/04/3023 at 9:20 AM the IP provided a copy of her certificate with a completion…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident had a functioning call system. This was evident for 1 (#6) of 68 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: Resident #6 had diagnoses which included, but was not limited to, dementia, anxiety, legal blindness, and syncope (fainting) and collapse. On 07/30/2023 at 7:23 PM, an observation conducted on the [NAME] Unit revealed that Resident #6's call system was continuously signaling the nurses station that assistance was required. A subsequent interview with Staff #9, a Registered Nurse, revealed that Resident #6's call system was malfunctioning. Staff #9 stated, I put in a maintenance request, but I guess nothing was done. Staff #9 pointed to where the call light indicator for Resident #6's room had been stuck on since 07/29/2023 at 11:59 PM. When asked how she would know if Resident #6 needed help, Staff #9 replied; [he/she] yells. On 07/31/2023 at 8:30 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on the record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a Geriatric Nursing Assistant (GNA) received the required 12 hours of in-service training. This was found to be evident for 1 (GNA #34) out of 5 training records reviewed during the recertification survey. The findings include: A record review on 08/09/23 at 10:00 AM, revealed that GNA #34 had not received the required 12 hours of annual in-service training since 7/13/2018. During an interview on 08/09/23 at 10:45 AM, the Staff Development, Staff #15, stated that she tried but could not locate additional training for GNA # 34. The Staff Development staff stated that she had not met GNA # 34 because she only worked once a month. During an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was notified of the missing required 12 hours of annual in-service training for GNA # 34 and stated she would look for more training records. On 08/09/23 at 2:33 PM, the DON confirmed that no other required training records were located for GNA # 34.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-11 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and observation it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the facility kitchen was managed by fully certified and competent staff, when since October 1, 2023, the facility had no Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) managing the kitchen. The failure to ensure fully certified and competent kitchen management provided effective oversight of practices in the kitchen increased the risk for infection and food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 11/29/23 at 12:47 PM a tour of the kitchen was conducted to follow-up on concerns cited during the annual survey that ended on 8/11/23. Dietary Staff #9 was in the dishwashing area and mentioned to the surveyor that they had been having problems with hot water while washing dishes. On 11/29/23 at 2:09 PM the surveyor returned to the kitchen to observe the dishwasher while dishes from the lunch service were being washed and sanitized. Observation of the temperature gauges on the outside of the dishwasher failed to reach the required temperature for adequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-11 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations, and documentation review, facility administration failed to effectively allocate resources to meet resident needs and to ensure their highest practicable well-being when (1) the facility administration failed to ensure effective management of dietary services with no Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) employed since October 1, 2023, (2) the facility administration failed to ensure and provide a safe and sanitary environment in the facility kitchen when the facility dishwasher and hot water heater had both failed and no hot water was available in the kitchen beginning intermittently on 11/6/23 and finally on 11/27/23; and (3) facility administration for at least three days allowed unsafe practices regarding food preparation, food service, and infection prevention and control requirements by utilizing the facility kitchen with no hot water (a) for hand washing and (b) for sanitization of dishes, utensils, pots, pans, trays and food prep surfaces; and (4) while continuing to operate the kitchen in unsafe and unsanitary conditions for at least 3 days, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and documentation review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment was operational and safe (1) when the facility hot water heater that supplied hot water to the kitchen began to fail intermittently on or around 11/9/23, and permanently on 11/27/23, and was not fixed or replaced, and (2) when the dishwasher failed to register the chemical cleaning agent as of 11/29/23, and it too was not fixed or replaced. With no hot water in the kitchen, all residents were at increased risk for food borne illness. The findings include: 1) The facility hot water heater that supplied hot water to the kitchen started to fail around 11/9/23 and was not fixed or replaced. On 11/27/23 the hot water heater totally failed to produce hot water to the kitchen on 11/27/23 and the facility was still waiting on contractor quotes as of 11/30/23 at 2:15 PM. On 11/29/23 at 12:47 PM a tour of the kitchen was conducted to follow-up on concerns cited during the annual survey that ended on 8/11/23. Dietary Staff #9 was in the dishwashing area and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to treat each resident in a dignified manner by 1) standing over a resident while feeding the resident, and 2) pulling a resident down the hallway backwards. This was evident for 4 (#11, #43, #22, #14) of 30 residents observed during the serving of lunch on 1 of 3 nursing units during a revisit survey. The findings include: 1. On 11/29/23 at 12:22 PM observation was made of Resident #11 sitting in a wheelchair in the dining area adjacent to the nurse's station in the Chase unit. The food delivery cart was next to where Resident #11 was sitting. Staff #25 was standing to feed Resident #11 while talking to 2 other staff members about something unrelated to residents or the facility. Staff #25 continued to stand and feed Resident #11 during the entire observation. 2. On 11/29/23 at 12:30 PM Resident #43 was sitting in the common area on the Chase unit during lunch in a semi-reclining geriatric chair. Staff #12 was reaching over to touch the resident's food that was sitting next to him/her. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were complete. These concerns with incomplete assessments were evident for 5 (#15, #54, #27, #45, #38) of 12 residents reviewed for completed quarterly assessments during a revisit survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on these individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. 1) On 11/30/23 at 10:30 AM a review of Resident #15 and Resident #54's quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/1/23 revealed the assessment was not complete for section C - Cognitive Patterns and Section D - Mood. A review of Resident #27 quarterly MDS with an ARD of 11/6/23 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical needs of a resident. This was found evident for 2 out of 11 (Residents #24 and #28) residents reviewed for care planning during an annual and complaint survey. The findings include: 1) On 7/25/23 at 1:25 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #24's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in early March of 2023 and had a past medical history of malignant neoplasm of the bladder (bladder cancer) and artificial opening of urinary tract. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #24 was admitted to the facility with a urostomy. A urostomy is created in a surgical procedure and re-directs urine to an opening in the abdominal wall. The urine is collected in a bag secured to the outer abdomen. A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess, and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. On 7/25/23 at 2:15 PM, the surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents attended care plan meetings. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #24, # 90) out of 11 residents reviewed for care plan meetings. The findings include: 1) On 7/25/23 at 1:25 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident # 24's medical record. The review revealed that Resident #24 was admitted to the facility in early March of 2023 and was his/her own representative, responsible for making his/her own decisions. On 7/26/23 at 8:16 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Social Service Assistant, Staff #4. During the interview Staff #4 stated she remembers Resident #24 had a care plan meeting in June but Resident #24 refused to attend. Staff #4 continued to state that if a Resident refuses it should be documented in the medical record. Staff #4 stated she would provide the attendance log. On 7/26/23 at 9:32 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Resident #24. During this interview Resident #24 stated he/she was not asked to participate in the any of the care plan meetings. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and observation it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure quality of care was provided to residents. This was evident for 4 (#161, #162, #60, #94, and #462) out of 68 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. The findings are: 1. Nursing failed to call physician for orders and to clarify treatment. An investigation of intake #MD00191247 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #161 was admitted on [DATE] from the hospital with an Aspen neck collar (device used to support and protect neck). The hospital discharge summary did not include orders on how to care for the collar nor were orders on collar care obtained from the primary physician. The paperwork from the hospital did include a summary of a hospital consultation with the surgeon that included a note indicating the collar was to stay on but not how to care for the skin underneath. Further review of the medical record revealed that the nursing did not seek and/or clarify orders…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-11 · tag F0711 — patternEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the physician progress notes were not in the resident medical records the day the resident was seen. This was evident for 5 (#41, #17, #14, #25, #52) of 54 residents reviewed during a revisit survey. The findings include: On 11/30/23 at 3:00 PM Resident #41's medical record was reviewed and revealed on 11/30/23 the physician progress notes were uploaded in the medical record for dates of service (DOS) 10/23/23, 11/1/23, and (2) notes from 11/17/23. Continued review of medical records revealed Resident #17's physician progress notes dated 11/8/23 and 11/17/23 were not uploaded into the medical record until 11/30/23. Resident #14's physician progress note of 11/3/23 was not uploaded in the medical record until 11/30/23. Resident #25's physician progress note of 11/3/23 was not uploaded in the medical record until 11/30/23. Resident #52's physician progress notes dated 10/23/23 and 10/24/23 were not uploaded in the medical record until 11/30/23. On 11/30/23 at 3:45 PM Physician #3 was interviewed and stated, both the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the review of facility administrative records and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a sufficient number of staff to meet the needs of the residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: During a phone interview conducted on 07/27/2023 at 11:32 AM, the complainant stated the resident was left soiled for long periods of time, staff turnover was high and staff complained they don't have enough staff. On 8/7/23 at 11:51 AM, the surveyor reviewed the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care documentation for August 2022 through December 2022 for Resident # 90. For the month of August there was no toilet use documented for 31 out of 87 shifts and urinary continence care was documented for 30 of 87 shifts. In September, toilet use was not documented 46 out of 90 shifts and urinary continence was not documented 47 out of 90 shifts. In October 2022 there was no toilet use documented for 38 out of 93 shifts and no urinary continence documented for 31 out of 90. For November 2022, 31 out of 90 shifts had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and facility staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all corridors had firmly installed handrails on each side. The findings include: On 07/25/2023 at 11 AM, surveyors observed there were no handrails available on either side of the two connected corridors in the facility. The first of the connected corridors began from the outside of a unit and at the furthest end, connected to the other corridor that led to the main entrance of the facility. On 07/31/2023 at 8:50 AM the interim Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) confirmed the absence of handrails. On 07/31/2023 at 09:21 AM an interview with the Maintenance Director who stated that he worked at the facility for 12 years and the two connected corridors never had handrails on either side. On 08/01/2023 at 9:10 AM the Maintenance Director confirmed that handrails were to be installed and the total distance of the connected corridors equaled two hundred thirty-six feet and six inches.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-11 · tag F0943 — patternGive their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the dementia training provided to staff included managing challenging behaviors. This was evident for 1 of 2 staff training PowerPoint slide show presentations reviewed for content. The findings include: On 08/02/2023 at 10:04 AM, an interview was conducted with Staff #11, the IP/Staff Development Nurse, regarding the dementia training provided to staff. Per Staff #11, the training consisted of a PowerPoint presentation upon hire and annually thereafter. If a staff member needed additional training, Staff #11 would review a typed version of the same PowerPoint presentation with that staff member. Per Staff #11, the PowerPoint information was the only dementia training provided. On 08/02/2023 at 10:15 AM, the dementia PowerPoint presentation that the facility utilized to train staff was reviewed. The presentation did not address managing challenging behaviors. Examples of challenging behaviors include, but are not limited to, aggressiveness, wandering, elopement, agitation, yelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's right to make decisions was honored. This was evident for 1 (#164) out of 68 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: An investigation into a complaint (#MD00173260) on 8/4/23 revealed that on 8/16/22 Resident #164's family member observed that the resident did not awaken when nudged and appeared unresponsive. The family member told the nursing staff who responded that the resident was normally slow to awaken and that this was normal. The family member called the daughter who was the responsible party. The daughter called the nursing station and demanded that the nurse check the resident. Vital signs were taken and were within normal limits. The resident was put on the phone to speak with the daughter. Resident #164 said he/she was fine. Daughter insisted the resident be sent out to the hospital via 911. The resident was alert and oriented x 2. The nurse informed the daughter that the resident had the right to decide whether or not to go to the hospital.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure that the resident's call light was within reach to allow access to assistance when needed. This was evident for 3 (#16, #21, #15) of 3 residents observed on the Chase nursing unit during the initial tour of the facility. The findings include: On 11/29/23 at 8:53 AM a tour of the facility was conducted. Observation was made in Resident #16's room of the resident lying in bed. The bed was on the left side of the room against the wall. Observation was made of the call bell hanging off the wall on the other side of the nightstand and out of reach of the resident. Observation was made of Resident #16's roommate, Resident #21, who was lying in bed. There was a soft gray call bell lying on the floor next to the bed. The surveyor watched staff go in and out of the rooms without placing the call bell within reach. On 11/30/23 at 9:07 AM a second observation was made of Resident #16's call bell cord hanging on the wall. At that time the surveyor asked Certified Medicine Aide (CMA), Staff #26 to come in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that nursing home staff fully informed a resident and their family of how to receive final disbursement of all monies sent to the facility in the resident's name. This was evident for 1 (#163) out of 68 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: An investigation into Intake #MD00192746 included a review of Resident #163's account which revealed the resident had $1,720 on [DATE]. The resident expired on [DATE]. The resident was charged $1407 on [DATE] for the cost of services for March. On [DATE] $1720 was returned to the Social Security Administration. The family, as of [DATE], had not received the money left in the resident's account. The Administrator was interviewed on [DATE] at 2:00 PM. He said that once the resident died the Power of Attorney (PoA) status disappeared. He said the former PoA has to write a letter to the Board of Administrators to request a check for the remaining balance. I asked if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined that the facility nursing staff failed to ensure a resident's family was notified of a hospitalization and to ensure only an authorized contact was notified. This was evident for 2 (#164 and #82) out of 68 residents in the survey sample. The findings are: 1. An investigation of intake #MD00182928 revealed Resident #164 was having respiratory issues on 7/26/22 at 5:30 AM. Nursing called the primary physician and an order to send to the hospital was received. The Power of Attorney (PoA) was not notified and did not know the resident was sent to the hospital until the resident returned to the facility. 2. An investigation of intake #MD00191339 revealed Resident #82 had a fall without injury on 1/20/23. Nursing staff called the daughter instead of the daughter in law. The daughter is not the responsible party or an approved contact person. The Acting Administrator was interviewed on 7/31/23 at 11:04 AM. She was informed the daughter is not an approved contact person and asked why she was called and not the daughter in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility documentation, it was determined the facility failed to report a critical unusual occurrence that affected the health and safety of all residents in the facility to the Office of Health Care Quality (OHCQ). This was evident for 3 days when the kitchen failed to have hot water to provide to the kitchen dishwasher, handwashing sinks, and the 3 compartment sink to wash pots and pans. The findings include: On 11/29/23 at 12:47 PM a tour of the kitchen was conducted to follow-up on concerns cited during the annual survey that ended on 8/11/23. Dietary Staff #9 was in the dishwashing area and mentioned to the surveyor that they had been having problems with hot water while washing dishes. On 11/29/23 at 2:09 PM the surveyor returned to the kitchen to observe the dishwasher while dishes from the lunch service were being washed and sanitized. Observation of the temperature gauges on the outside of the dishwasher failed to reach the required temperature for adequate sanitation. Staff #8 was in the dishwashing area at that time and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of faciity records and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation. This was found to be evident for 2 (# 25, # 32) out of 20 facility reported incidents. The findings include: On 07/27/23 at 8:45 AM, a record review revealed that a facility reported incident (FRI) regarding Resident #25 was received by the Office of Healthcare Quality on 04/26/2022 at 1:06 PM. In the FRI, the facility reported that per Resident #25, on 03/18/2022 Staff #46 threw a remote at him/her. The facility's investigation was reviewed and was deemed to be missing several key components: 1. The self-report is missing. 2. The facility failed to obtain an interview with the alleged perpetrator, Staff #46. 3. No other residents, including the roommate, were interviewed. 4. There was no evidence that measures were put into place to protect the resident from further abuse while the investigation was being completed. On 07/27/23 at 11:04 AM, a record review revealed that a FRI regarding Resident #32 was received by the Office of Health Care Quality on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were complete. These concerns with incomplete assessments were evident for 1 (#44) of 5 residents reviewed for an annual/admission assessment during a revisit survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on these individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. On 11/30/23 at 10:30 AM a review of Resident #44's annual MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/4/23 revealed the assessment was not complete for section C - Cognitive Patterns and Section D - Mood. On 11/30/23 at 11:37 AM an interview was conducted with the MDS Coordinator who stated, our social worker does those…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide incontinence care. This was evident for 1 (# 90) out of 8 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care. The findings include: The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care is a term used to collectively describe fundamental skills required to care for oneself, such as bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring (getting in and out of bed or chair), eating, and continence. During a phone interview conducted on 07/27/2023 at 11:32 AM, the complainant stated the resident was left soiled for long periods of time. On 8/7/23 at 11:51 AM, the surveyor reviewed the ADL care documentation for August 2022 through December 2022 for Resident # 90. For the month of August there was no toilet use documented for 31 out of 87 shifts and urinary continence care was documented for 30 of 87 shifts. In September, toilet use was not documented 46 out of 90 shifts and urinary continence was not documented 47 out of 90 shifts. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that consent was obtained prior to utilizing bed rails. This was evident for 1 (#212) of 68 residents reviewed during the annual survey. The findings include: Bed rails are adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed. They are available in a variety of types, shapes, and sizes ranging from full to one-half, one-quarter, or one-eighth lengths. On 08/08/2023, at 2:50 PM, a record review was conducted which revealed that Resident #212 had diagnoses which included, but were not limited to, left femur fracture, stroke and hemiplegia affecting his/her left non-dominant side. Hemiplegia is a severe or complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body. A review of the MDS (Minimum Data set, or MDS, is a screening tool), with an assessment reference date of 01/17/2023, identified that the resident was cognitively intact. A nurses note dated 03/10/2023 at 12:27 PM, described how Resident #212 fell from bed while receiving care from staff. The corresponding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the physician provided supervision for a resident with significant weight loss. This was found to be evident for 1 (Resident #90) out of 1 resident's reviewed for weight loss. The findings include: According to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) a significant weight loss is a weight loss of: 5% in one month; 7.5% in 3 months; or 10% in 6 months. During a phone interview conducted on 07/27/23 at 11:32 AM, the complainant stated the resident lost significant weight and the facility had not addressed it. During a review of the Resident # 90 weights on 07/28/23 at 06:54 AM, the surveyor discovered that on 09/21/22 Resident # 90's weight was 185.6 pounds and on 10/07/22 it was 163 pounds which was a 12.18 % weight loss. The physician progress notes from 11/4/22, 12/30/22, 1/27/23 and 3/3/23 report no weight changes and the Certified Registered Nurse Practitioner (CRNP) notes written on 10/24/22, 12/3/22, 1/2/23 and 2/18/23 did not address the weight loss. During an interview on 7/28/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-11 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to consistently monitor the behavior of a resident. This was found to be evident for 1 (#28) out of 1 resident reviewed for behavioral monitoring. The findings include: A complaint investigated on 8/21/2023 at 8:00 AM confirmed Resident #28 had been sexually inappropriate (masturbating) in a common area (dining room) on 04/04/2023. On 8/21/23 at 08:30 AM, the surveyors reviewed medical records for Resident #28. A review of the Monitor Behavior Symptoms tool from March 23 through the end of July 23 for sexually inappropriate revealed documentation for inappropriate sexual behavior only on 4/10/2023. Further review of the resident's progress note dated 4/4/23 at 2:28 PM, revealed a note from Social Worker (SW) # 4 that stated, I spoke with resident about the incident that happened today, and [resident] does understand [resident] shouldn't have done that, and [resident] was sorry, and [resident] will go to [resident] room for now on. I told [resident] that I talked to [resident] guardian, and [resident]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview of facility staff. it was determined that the facility staff failed to promote and enhance a resident's dignity while assisting the resident with their breakfast and lunch. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed during the annual survey process. The findings include: An observation was made on 2/12/19 at 1:30 PM of resident # 310 as s/he was being fed by GNA #5. GNA # 5 was standing above the resident feeding her/his lunch to the resident. The resident was leaning towards the right side of the bed and the GNA was standing on the left side of the bed leaning over the resident. An observation was made on 02/13/19 08:41 AM of resident # 310 as s/he was being fed by GNA # 6. GNA # 6 was standing above the resident feeding her/his breakfast to the resident. Interview with the Chief Nurse on 2/13/19 at 2:00 PM confirmed the facility staff failed to provide Resident # 310 with the most dignified existence while providing meals.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-15 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to provide a written notice for emergency transfers to the resident and/or the resident representative. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 8 residents reviewed for a facility-initiated transfer during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1. A medical record review for Resident # 310 was conducted on 02/14/19. Review of the physician order written on 1/30/19 revealed that Resident # 310 had a change in their medical condition that required an immediate transfer to an acute care hospital for further evaluation. Review of the medical record failed to reveal a written notice for emergency transfers to the resident, resident representative and the ombudsman. 2. A medical record review for Resident # 112 was conducted on 02/14/19. Review of the physician order written on 11/15/2018 revealed that Resident # 112 had a change in their medical condition that required an immediate transfer to an acute care hospital for further evaluation. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. Review of the medical record for Resident #108 on 2/13/19 revealed Resident #108 had physician orders to obtain pre and post-dialysis vitals and weights. Monitoring a dialysis patient's weight helps the healthcare professional decide how much fluid needs to be removed from the body during dialysis. Maintaining a regular record of a patient's weight is necessary to avoid removing too much or too little fluid from the body. Review of Resident #108's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) revealed that post dialysis weights had not been obtained on 1/17/19 and 1/31/19. Review of Resident #108's Weight History showed no recorded weights on 1/17/19 and 1/31/19. Review of Resident #108's Dialysis Communication Forms from 1/17/19 and 1/31/19 showed no recorded weights by the facility. A Dialysis Communication Form is completed by both facility nurses and dialysis center nurses. It records vitals such as weight and temperature for the dialysis patient. Resident #108's Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (Staff #3) was asked on 2/14/19 at 8:42 AM about the missing weights and was unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to administer oxygen to Resident #6 in accordance with the standard of practice. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident # 6 revealed diagnosis including but limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). COPD is a lung disease characterized by chronic obstruction of the lung airflow that interferes with normal breathing and is not fully reversible. Surveyor observation of Resident #6 on 02/12/19 at 09:46 AM revealed the resident in bed with the use of oxygen via nasal cannula. Further observation revealed the oxygen was being delivered using a concentrator which are medical devices that deliver medical grade oxygen (greater than 88% pure oxygen) to a patient via either a nasal cannula or mask. A nasal oxygen cannula is a device that consists of a plastic tube that fits behind the ears, and a set of two prongs that are placed in the nostrils. Oxygen flows from these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to conduct AIMs testing on Residents (# 65). This was evident for 1 of 1 resident selected for review during the survey process. The findings include: The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) is a rating scale that was designed in the 1970's to measure involuntary movements known as tardive dyskinesia (TD). TD is a disorder that sometimes develops as a side effect of long-term treatment with neuroleptic (antipsychotic) medications. Tardive dyskinesia is a syndrome characterized by abnormal involuntary movements of the patient's face, mouth, trunk, or limbs, which affects 20%-30% of patients who have been treated for months or years with neuroleptic medications. Persons taking any kind of antipsychotic medication need to be monitored for movement disorders. The AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) aids in the early detection of tardive dyskinesia as well as providing a method for on-going surveillance. The facility staff failed to conduct an AIMS on Resident # 65. Medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2019-02-15 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure staffing hours for nursing staff were posted and to ensure 18 months of posted nursing data were maintained. This was true for 3 out of 3 nursing units. The findings are: This surveyor requested the staff postings from the past 18 months. The Chief Clinical Officer (CCO) stated at 4:02 PM that they are not maintaining 18 months of staff postings. I toured the facility on 2/14/19. Observation of the staff postings for the Chase unit revealed that at 4:13 PM the actual hours worked for the nurses, Geriatric Nursing Assistants (GNA's), and the Certified Medicine Aides (CMA) was not on the staffing sheet. Observation of the staff postings for the Antioch unit revealed actual hours worked for the nurses, GNA's, and CMA's were not posted. Observation of the [NAME] unit revealed that the staff postings did not include actual working hours for the nurses, GNA's, and the CMA's. The CCO was interviewed on 02/14/19 at 04:56…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,685 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-04-01
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to KEY HEALTH MANAGEMENT — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 1.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 3.0 | -2.0 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MANOKIN OPERATIONS HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 08/01/2022 |
| MD2 INVESTORS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| HIRTH, YECHIEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| MANOKIN PROPERTY HOLDCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| FOSKEY, TINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| HOWARD, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2023 |
| KEY HEALTH MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| AUSCH, SARA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| EISEN, MENASHE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| KLEIN, YEHUDIS | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| PERLSTEIN, BARRY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
| SCHLUSSEL, NAFTALI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 26% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215179. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.