No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aitkin Health Services

301 Minnesota Avenue South, Aitkin, MN 56431 · Non profit - Church related · 42 certified beds · (218) 927-5514 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (218) 927-5514 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)2 actual-harm citations$8,824 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $8,824 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-12)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
200 Bunker Hill Dr · (218) 927-2157 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
226 Minnesota Ave N · (218) 670-7120 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
171 Red Oak Dr · (218) 927-6919 · Call to confirm hours
Park
307 2nd St NW · (218) 927-7284 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.8%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%4.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.7%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection7.8%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.5%4.1%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.4%4.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened25.3%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.6%12.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.6%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.7%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table21.2%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine29.2%82.7%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.19
RN hours/ resident / day
0.27
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.75
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.72
RN hoursweekends
48.8%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 33.4 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.19 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.75 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.38 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.38 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-04)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to supervise, implement, and assess fall interventions to reduce the risk of falls for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls. This resulted in actual harm when R1 fell and sustained a laceration to the middle of her forehead which required an emergency department (ED) visit and sutures. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated 4/29/24, indicated R1 had arthritis in both hips, spinal stenosis (abnormal narrowing of the spinal canal), and mild cognitive impairment. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had mild impaired cognition, had two or more falls without injury and one fall with minor injury, and needed extensive assistance with transfers, toileting and bed mobility. R1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] indicated R1 had three or more falls in the last 90 days, was confined to her chair, needed assistance with elimination, and not steady on her feet without assistance. R1's score was 20 (a score of 10 or higher put the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed who did not receive the necessary care and monitoring related to multiple incorrect insertion attempts of an indwelling catheter which resulted in bleeding, blood clots, pain, discomfort, low urine output, and low blood pressure, leading to a diagnosis of sepsis and admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) via ambulance. This resulted in actual harm for R1. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and no behaviors noted. MDS indicated R1 had an indwelling catheter, always incontinent of bowel, and neurogenic bladder (interference of the relationship between the nervous system and bladder function and affects the way bladder functions due to injury or disease). MDS also indicated R1 had impairment on one side of his upper and lower body and was dependent upon staff for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure linens were handled properly to help prevent the spread of infection. In addition, the facility failed to maintain a water management program which identified potential areas for water-borne bacteria and maintain records of water management activities. Findings include:Linen HandlingDuring an observation on entrance on 6/1/26 at 1:50 p.m., in an alcove next to the elevator down to the conference room, stood a three-shelved unit storing clean linens, the cover was observed up over the top of the unit and there were items stored up on top of the cover which was folded back. A sign on the cart indicated please close the cover. During an observation on 6/3/26 at 12:23 p.m., the linen cart was observed to be uncovered as it was on 6/1/26.During an observation and interview on 6/3/26 at 2:56 p.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A, who identified as the facility infection preventionist (IP) observed the uncovered linen cart and stated this didn't meet his expectations and would be a risk for bacteria to get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date opened products, dispose of expired products, and failed to have a process to ensure stored food was labeled with an expiration date that staff could understand. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received food from facility kitchen.Findings include:During the initial kitchen tour on 6/1/26 at 2:39 p.m., with the kitchen manager (KM), the following was observed:In dry storage, there was an unopened jar of Molly's vegetable base with no discernable expiration date. KM stated they were not aware the product had no expiration date, and they would need to date the product when received so staff would know when to discard the product.In the walk-in cooler, there was an open, undated bottle of lemon juice with a best use by date of 10/6/25. KM removed the lemon juice from the cooler and stated they would discard it. They stated a concern for food quality when a product was beyond its best used by date.In freezer 2, there were 4 bags of corn and black bean fiesta mix dated 4/15/26 with no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to consistently educate, offer, or administer influenza and pneumococcal immunizations for 4 of 5 residents.Findings include:R1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified resident was rarely if ever understood and a cognitive assessment was not performed.R1's admission record identified an admission date of 11/1/2024, and diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and dementia.A report, Aitkin Health Services (AHS) Immunization Report dated 1/1/2005 to 6/30/26 identified R1 hadn't had influenza or pneumococcal vaccinations.An undated form, Vaccination Consent, identified R1 hadn't had an influenza, but wished to receive one. Also, R1 hadn't had a pneumococcal vaccination and there was no entry indicating if she did or didn't want to receive one. The form didn't contain evidence the resident or resident representative was offered education regarding vaccinations.R4's quarterly MDS dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-04 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were educated about and offered the COVID-19 vaccination for 3 of 5 residents (R1, R4, R23) reviewed for vaccinations.Findings include:R1's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified resident was rarely if ever understood and a cognitive assessment was not performed.R1's admission record identified an admission date of 11/1/2024, and diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and dementia.A report, Aitkin Health Services (AHS) Immunization Report dated 1/1/2005 to 6/30/26 identified R1 hadn't had the COVID-19 vaccinations.An undated form, Vaccination Consent, identified R1 hadn't had a COVID-19 vaccination and didn't want to receive one. The form didn't contain evidence the resident or resident representative was offered education regarding vaccination.R4's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of hypertension, chronic pain, gastroesophageal reflux…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to review and revise the resident care plans to reflect changes in resident care for 2 of 5 residents (R4, R23) reviewed for care planning.Findings include:R4:R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and a diagnosis of legal blindness as defined in the United States. R4 propelled her own wheelchair and could wheel 150 feet independently.R4's care plan dated 7/21/25, identified R4 was at risk for falls related to vision problems and included interventions to assist with mobility and transfers, assure call light was in reach, reorient her to her room, assess fall risk every quarter and with changes in condition. R4's care plan didn't identify R4 needed supervision outside.According to a Nursing Home Incident Report dated 6/3/26, R4 had a fall from her wheelchair on the facility's outdoor patio on 5/27/26. Actions to prevent recurrence included direct supervision when R4 was outside for activities.During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL) tasks were performed for a resident dependent on others to complete ADLs for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for ADLs.Findings include:R3's significant change in assessment (SCSA) minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis of the right side related to a cerebral vascular accident (CVA, or stroke), fracture of the upper and lower end of the left fibula, unspecified fracture of the upper end of the left tibia, other fracture of the upper and lower end of the right fibula, unspecified fracture of upper end of right tibia, and unspecified fracture of the shaft of the right fibula. The MDS also identified R3 was dependent for personal hygiene.R3's care plan dated 2/26/25, identified a focus statement for ADL self-care deficit and included interventions for a bath scheduled Sunday afternoons and preferred to be shaved if facial hair was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide edema management and provide root cause analysis, care, and monitoring for a skin injury for 1 of 1 resident (R23) reviewed for quality of care.Findings include:R23's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of chronic congestive heart failure (CHF, a condition whereby the heart can't pump blood efficiently to meet the body's needs and may lead to accumulation of fluids in the lungs, legs and other areas), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD, a disorder of the blood vessels). R23 had impaired range of motion (ROM) on one upper extremity and both lower extremities (LE) and needed moderate assistance with putting on or taking off footwear.R23's care plan dated 2/17/26, identified the need for assistance donning and doffing TEDs (compression stockings) or [NAME] (specific brand of compression stockings) stockings. On 1/15/26, a focus statement for the risk of increased edema…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer annual audiology services or assist with routine hearing aid care for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for hearing maintenance.Findings include:R3's significant change is status (SCSA) minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and moderate difficulty hearing with hearing aids in place. R3 was dependent on staff for upper and lower body dressing, personal hygiene, and bed mobility. R3's care plan dated 2/26/25, identified a focus statement for being hard of hearing with a goal for her hearing aid to be accessible, clean, and available for use. Interventions included assisting to place and remove hearing aids daily, assist with charging, to review hearing status quarterly, and to offer audiology services annually. The care plan didn't identify to check or clean hearing aid filters.R3's provider orders didn't contain hearing aid maintenance.An assessment, Long Term Care Evaluation dated 12/15/25, identified R3 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure safe hot water temperatures in resident bathrooms in an area where 5 of 6 residents had potential to use the bathroom sink, and 1 of 6 residents (R23) expressed concern with hot water temperatures when reviewed for environmental concerns. In addition, the facility failed to follow care plan interventions for fall prevention for 1 of 2 residents (R39) reviewed for falls. Findings include: According to the State Operations Manual (SOM), as published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Revision 232, page 366: Water temperature of 100 degrees Fahrenheit (F) would be deemed a safe temperature for bathing. At 120 degrees F the time required for a third-degree burn (burns penetrate the entire thickness of the skin and permanently destroy tissue) was five minutes; at 140 degrees F the time required for a third-degree burn would be five seconds. R23's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention measures were followed as care planned for 1 of 2 residents (R39) who had a indwelling catheter. Findings include:R39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], was in progress and ready for export. The cognition assessment indicated R39 was cognitively intact.R39's Facesheet dated 6/4/26, included diagnoses of diabetes, lymphedema, muscle weakness, and urinary retention.R39's care plan initiated 5/18/26, indicated R39 had an indwelling foley catheter related to urinary retention. 5/18/26, goals included R39 will show no signs or symptoms of urinary infection. Interventions for the catheter initiated 5/18/26, instructed staff to keep R39's catheter bag off the floor.During an observation on 6/1/26 at 3:30 p.m., R39 was seated in a recliner chair with legs partially elevated on the footrest. R39's catheter drainage bag was hanging off the side pocket of the chair on R39's right side facing the door. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of open enteral feeding solutions and failed to date tube feeding supplies for 1 (R8) of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding.Findings include:R8's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R8 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, dysphagia, diabetes mellitus type 2, non-Alzheimer dementia, and anxiety disorder.R8's care plan revised 2/26/26, tube feeding care included:Bolus feeding.Change feeding solution container and syringe every 24 hours. Follow manufacturers' recommendations or per registered dietician regarding how long formula can be open.R8's provider orders dated 6/4/26, included:Change syringe and water container daily before breakfast.Please have dietician eval resident tube feeding needs and make recommendations.Jevity 1.2 Calorie Oral Liquid (Nutritional Supplements) Give 553 milliliters (mL) via gastrostomy tube (G-tube) three times a day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to initiate orders and maintain documentation to ensure oxygen supplies were properly cleaned and maintained for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for respiratory care.Findings include:R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 was severely cognitively impaired. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, heart failure, hypertension, pneumonia, non-Alzheimer's dementia.R1's care plan did not include oxygen use.R1's had a provider order dated 1/6/26, for oxygen 2 liters as needed (prn) to keep oxygen saturations above 90% and as needed for shortness of breath.R1's treatment administration record (TAR) reviewed on 6/2/26, included oxygen 2 liters prn to keep oxygen saturations above 90% as needed and for shortness of breath as needed, but had no instructions for cleaning, maintenance, or changing of oxygen tubing. TARs dated 3/2026, 4/2026, and 5/2026, also had no instructions for cleaning, maintenance, or changing of oxygen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC, Form CMS-10123) to 2 of 3 residents (R10, R37) reviewed whose Medicare Part A coverage ended and remained in the facility. Findings included: R10's Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage form (SNF ABN, CMS-10055), dated 3/10/25, identified on 3/13/25, estimated a daily rate of $515,44 would be charged and not covered by Medicare-A. R10's medical record lacked indication CMS-10123 was provided to the resident at least 48 hours prior to stoppage of Medicare part A. R10's census list dated 5/15/25, identified R10 remained a resident of the facility after 3/13/25, but not on Medicare part A as payer source. R37's Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage form (SNF ABN, CMS-10055), dated 11/25/24, identified on 11/28/24, an estimated daily rate of $500.00 would be charged and not covered by Medicare-A. R37's medical record lacked indication CMS-10123 was provided to the resident at least 48 hours prior to stoppage of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure ordered as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medications were limited to a 14-day time period and a face-to-face provider visit with clinical documentation indicating the medication needed to remain was performed prior to the medication extended past the 14 day period. The facility also failed to document behaviors and non-pharmacological interventions utilized prior to usage of an antipsychotic for 1 of 5 (R39) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], identified R39 had significant cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included hypertension and dementia. Medications received included an antipsychotic. R39's active Order Summary Report dated 5/15/25, indicated Quetiapine Fumarate (an antipsychotic medication used for mental health behaviors) 25mg by mouth every 8 hours PRN for agitation, anxiety, or delusion was ordered on 4/17/25. The order lacked a 14 day stop date.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to enter and follow provider orders for 1 of 1 resident (R9) reviewed for provider orders. Findings included: R9's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated R9 was cognitively intact and diagnoses included coronary artery disease, heart failure, and hypertension. Medications taken daily included a diuretic (water removing pill). R9's admission orders dated 4/17/25, indicated daily weights and to notify the provider for a 2-pound (lb.) weight gain in 24 hours or a 5 lb. weight gain in 7 days. R9's active Order Summary Report dated 5/13/25 lacked an order for daily weights or to call the provider based on weight gain parameters specified in the orders. During an interview on 5/13/25 at 1:18 p.m., nurse assistant (NA)-A stated all residents with daily weights were done by the NA and then given to the nurse to review. NA-A looked at her list and stated R9 was not a daily weight. During an interview 5/13/25 registered nurse (RN)-A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to follow grievance policy and procedures involving 2 of 2 residents (R1, R2) when R1 voiced concerns about treatment received from another resident (R2) in the facility and a grievance was never filed on behalf of R1, and he was never provided resolution or follow up. Findings include: R1's admission Record indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition. R1's care plan dated 4/10/25, indicated he was alert and oriented and was able to express his needs. R2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 8 (moderate cognitive impairment), verbal behaviors directed toward others (threatening, screaming, cursing) 1-3 days. During interview on 4/29/25 at 4:21 p.m., R1 stated R2 intentionally antagonized him and said, I want it to stop. R1 said R2 approached him and and said things like, hit me, hit me. R1 stated he was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to reduce the risk of falls for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for accidents and supervisor. R3 had a high risk for falls and was observed attempting to self-transfer from a wheelchair to bed. Findings include: During continuous observation on 3/19/25, R3 was seated in the dining room with his eyes closed at 6:45 a.m., where he remained until 7:47 a.m., when he propelled himself down the hall toward his room. Staff spoke with R3 on his way down the hall. At 7:51 a.m. R3 was observed propelling from his room. At 7:47 a.m. R3 told NA-B, I want to go to sleep but they keep kicking me out. NA-B said, they kicked you out, huh. then walked away. At 8:02 a.m. a staff member moved R3 to a table in the common area where he sat with a book. At 8:25 a.m. R3 remained seated in his wheelchair with his eyes closed. At 9:12 a.m. R3 again propelled himself toward his room. At 9:18 a.m., R3 got the door to his room open, and a housekeeper moved him back into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician timely with a change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (R1) when staff inserted an indwelling catheter three times, resulted in bleeding, blood clots, pain, discomfort, low urine output, and low blood pressure, sent to emergency room via ambulance, and developed sepsis, and admitted to intensive care unit. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and no behaviors noted. MDS indicated R1 had an indwelling catheter, always incontinent of bowel, and neurogenic bladder (interference of the relationship between the nervous system and bladder function and affects the way bladder functions due to injury or disease). MDS also indicated R1 had impairment on one side of his upper and lower body and was dependent upon staff for all cares, transfers, and repositioning. R1's health conditions form dated 6/2/24, to 7/2/24, were identified as anemia, benign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (R1) whose indwelling catheter was incorrectly placed three times resulting in bleeding, blood clots, pain, discomfort, low urine output, prolonged provider notification, sepsis, sent to emergency room via ambulance, and admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and no behaviors noted. R1 had an indwelling catheter and always incontinent of bowel. R1 had a neurogenic bladder (interference of the relationship between the nervous system and bladder function and affects the way bladder functions due to injury or disease). R 1 had impairment on one side of his upper and lower body and was dependent upon staff for all cares, transfers, and repositioning. R1's hospital admission notes dated 7/2/24, indicated indwelling catheter change completed at nursing home facility last evening resulted in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and take steps to correct neglect of care for 1 of 1 resident (R1) who did not receive the necessary care and monitoring when facility staff inserted an indwelling catheter incorrectly three times, resulted in bleeding, blood clots, pain, discomfort, low urine output, prolonged provider notification, and low blood pressure, sent to emergency room via ambulance, and developed sepsis, and admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and no behaviors noted. R1 had an indwelling catheter and always incontinent of bowel. R1 had a neurogenic bladder (interference of the relationship between the nervous system and bladder function and affects the way bladder functions due to injury or disease). R 1 had impairment on one side of his upper and lower body and was dependent upon staff for all cares, transfers, and repositioning. R1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the resident or resident's representative was informed of the bed hold policy at the time of hospitalization for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and no behaviors noted. R1 had an indwelling catheter and always incontinent of bowel. R1 had a neurogenic bladder (interference of the relationship between the nervous system and bladder function and affects the way your bladder function due to injury or disease). R1 had impairment on one side of his upper and lower body and was dependent upon staff for all cares, transfers, and repositioning. Review of R1's progress notes from 7/2/24, through 7/5/24, identified: - On 7/2/24, at 5:09 a.m. R1 screaming, reported a lot of pain rated 10 out of 10, blood pressure 90/53, bladder scanned 249 milliliters (ml), no urine in bag. On call provider notified and gave order to send to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to prevent future burns from hot beverages for 1 of 3 residents (R1), who spilled his coffee and noted to have redness on thigh and hand after staff utilized the microwave to reheat the cup of coffee. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility who drank hot beverages. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses which included dementia and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. Review of facility report to the State Agency (SA) dated 4/3/24, indicated staff had placed a cup of coffee into the microwave to warm the coffee up. Staff brought the cup of coffee to R1 and the R1 spilt the coffee onto his lap. R1 was assessed for injuries by nursing staff and R1 was noted to have redness on his left thigh and left hand. Report indicated R1 drank coffee with every meal and no incidents previously. Further, report…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and update the plan of care for skin breakdown interventions for 1 of 2 residents (R17) reviewed for care planning. Findings include: R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderately intact cognition and diagnoses of right-sided hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness), hemiparesis (one-sided decrease in muscle strength), multiple sclerosis (MS an immune disorder affecting the nervous system), and ataxia (impaired coordination). R17 was at risk for pressure injury, had actual moisture associated skin damage (MASD), needed moderate assistance with rolling side to side, total assistance with toileting hygiene, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Provider orders for R17 dated 2/14/24, identified nursing assistants (NA)s may apply barrier creams for skin care, skin checks by licensed nurses after bathing on Wednesdays, as well as daily skin checks during routine care. A care plan dated 2/26/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively reassess and develop interventions to ensure appropriate care was provided to prevent pressure injuries for 1 of 1 resident (R17) reviewed who had a pattern of skin breakdown and was at risk for pressure ulcer formation. Findings include: R17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified moderately intact cognition and diagnoses of right-sided hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness), hemiparesis (one-sided decrease in muscle strength), multiple sclerosis (MS an immune disorder affecting the nervous system), and ataxia (impaired coordination). R17 was at risk for pressure injury, had actual moisture associated skin damage (MASD), needed moderate assistance with rolling side to side, total assistance with toileting hygiene, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Provider orders for R17 dated 2/14/24, identified nursing assistants (NA)s may apply barrier creams for skin care, skin checks by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to monitor side effects of diuretic therapy and to act upon pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 5 residents (R16) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R16's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified diagnoses of osteoporosis, chronic pain, hypertension, and atrial flutter (an abnormal heart rhythm). Provider orders for R16 dated 11/29/23, identified ibuprofen 200 milligrams (mg) take one tablet two times daily, vital signs every week on Tuesdays, amiloride (a diuretic medication) 5 mg take half tablet once daily, spironolactone (a diuretic medication) 100 mg take two tabs in the morning and one tab in the afternoon. R16's care plan dated 2/27/24, identified a problem statement for hypertension with interventions to monitor vital signs, update the provider with abnormal values, and observe for listed side effects of diuretics. The care plan also included a problem statement for pain related to effects of osteoporosis and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic (mood altering) medication order was renewed beyond 14 days without an end date and to act upon pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 5 residents (R32) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R32's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of Alzheimer's dementia, dementia with severe behavioral disturbance and sleep disorder. R32 was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living (ADLs). R32's care plan dated 2/26/24, identified R32 took antianxiety medication related to behaviors. Interventions included medication administration, observing for side effects, making referrals for behaviors as needed, observing for changes in behavior and updating the provider. Provider orders for R32's identified the following: -8/7/23 Ativan (an anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 milligrams (mg) give one-half tab once daily on Monday and Fridays 30 minutes prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to develop a trauma informed care plan as well as establish mental health services in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents (R2), which had the potential for psychosocial harm. Findings include: R2's quarterly minimal data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 had diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis, anxiety disorder and depression. R2's mood interview revealed R2 had moderate signs and symptoms of depression, including feeling down and thoughts of being better off dead or hurting self nearly every day. R2' Trauma-Informed Care assessment dated [DATE], revealed she had experienced mental, physical, and emotional abuse from past husbands and the most difficult time in R2's life was when her son and boyfriend died. R2 stated now I am sad all the time. Further, assessment indicated talking helps her when she is feeling anxious, angry, or sad and stated she did not have any support persons to help. R2 care plan dated [DATE], indicated R2 received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nonpharmacological interventions were care planned, attempted, and recorded before the administration of PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication for 1 of 3 residents (R3) who were reviewed. In addition, the facility failed to ensure residents prescribed psychotropic medications were monitored for target behaviors for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed. Findings include: R3's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had a diagnosis of anxiety and was cognitively intact. R3 did not exhibit any behaviors. R3's medication administration record dated March 2023, indicated R3 could utilize alprazolam (Xanax) 0.25 milligram PRN after scheduled nighttime dose and before 3:00 a.m., which R3 received 17 times in March. R3's record lacked evidence of non-pharmacological interventions attempted prior to administering PRN medication. R3's Psychoactive Medication Informed Consent Form dated 2/9/23, revealed R3 had an order for Xanax and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure coordination of care upon discharge from the hospital for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition. In addition, the facility failed to monitor a newly identified bruise for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed. Findings include: R1's significant change minimal data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of dementia, anxiety and severe cognitive impairment. R1's care plan printed 12/19/23, identified R1 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) such as dressing, toileting, grooming, transferring, and ambulating. R1's Emergency Department (ED) Provider Notes dated 11/26/23, revealed R1 was noted to have a closed fracture of multiple pubic rami with no restrictions, course of action recommended was weight bear as tolerated with walker. Further review of ED note indicated R1 had a urinalysis completed, which did not reveal any concern for a urinary tract infection (UTI). At the time of discharge from the ED,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed who was diagnosed with Coronavirus disease (COVID)-19. In addition, the facility failed to ensure visitors were educated on appropriate PPE while visiting a resident who was positive for COVID-19. Findings include: R1's significant change minimal data set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R1 had diagnoses of dementia, anxiety and had severe cognitive impairment. R1's care plan printed 12/19/23, identified R1 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) such as dressing, toileting, grooming, transferring, and ambulating. Review of untitled document dated 12/15/23, identified a rapid swab was performed on R1 and returned with a positive COVID-19 result. R1 was immediately placed on isolation precautions per CDC regulations. Resident had staff that wear PPE for airborne precautions and don/doff PPE (gown, gloves, face shield, N95…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report a serious bodily injury within two hours, as required, to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 3 residents (R2), who sustained fractured ribs following a fall. Findings include: R2's annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R2 had diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and severely impaired cognition. R2's MDS identified R2 required extensive assistance of one staff for activities of daily living such as bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting. MDS revealed R2 has had two or more falls with no injury since prior MDS assessment. R2's Fall Scene Investigation dated 4/20/23, indicated R2 had an unwitnessed fall in her room and was found on the floor in a sitting position and at the time of the fall R2 was assessed by licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A, who determined there were no injuries or concerns at that time. Further, Fall Scene Investigation revealed on 4/21/23, R2 was brought to Urgent Care to be evaluated and x-rays revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and document review, the facility failed analysis root cause for falls for 1 of 3 (R3), implement interventions determined by the interdisciplinary team (IDT) to prevent future falls for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) and revise care plans with updated fall interventions for 3 of 3 residents (R1,R2, R3) reviewed for falls. Findings include: R1's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 had diagnosis of dementia and severely impaired cognition. R1's MDS identified R1 required extensive assistance by two staff members for activities of daily living (ADLs) such as bed mobility, transfers, dressing and toileting. MDS revealed R1 had two or more falls with no injury since admission. R1's Fall Scene Investigation dated 8/12/23, revealed IDT reviewed R1's fall and new intervention was added to have staff turn on favorite radio station when R3 was in bed due to R3 enjoying country music and finds music soothing. However, R3's care plan lacked evidence of being revised to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,824 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $8,824 — penalty dated 2024-12-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.6+0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVICES OF MORRIS, INCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/26/2006
DRIPPS, DANIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016
EHLERS, DOUGLASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
GOODNOUGH, JENNIFERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
GRAMM, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
LAIR, MICHAELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LIENEMANN, STEVENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LUETMER, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
NELSON, PATRICKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
RENTZ, LAURAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
RENTZ, PAULIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
SCHNEIDER, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2013
WIESE, LORRAINEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/25/2017
BACH, CURTISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/24/2024
PETERSON-DEVRIES, CAMIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2022
RAW, CAROLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2005
BIG STONE THERAPIES, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2015
EIDE BAILLY LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2023
ARNOLD, JILLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/15/2021
BAKKE, CHRISTINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/30/2019
CASPERS, MEGANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/26/2018
COPEMAN, JEFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DIONISOPOULOS, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2024
FLYNN, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/19/2017
HANNEKEN, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/20/2022
HAUVER, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
HEJHAL, ROXANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/10/2023
HENDERSON, JEFFERYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/23/2022
HOFMANN, REEDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2023
HUSETH, KENDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2024
JONAS, CARRIEANNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/21/2019
MARLOW, JINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/06/2022
PEGEL, BETSYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/08/2024
RADAICH, BOBBIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/09/2017
RENTZ, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/22/2024
RYAN, BENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2012
SANFORD, MELINDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/27/2015
STOCK, KELSEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2022
THOMPSON, RENEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/22/2024
TOMOSON, APRILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/12/2021
VIAN, DEANNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/19/2024
WALKER, AMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 104 rows in the source record cover these 42 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$187K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 3%Other / private 30%

This home reported $187K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$406per resident / day
operating cost
$12,353per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 245119. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next