Heritage Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 57.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to track and report lack of bowel movements to provider for 2 of 2 residents (R16, R52) reviewed for bowel tracking. This resulted in actual harm when R16 was hospitalized for constipation and subsequently taken to the operating room for disimpaction. In addition, the facility failed to monitor vital signs and complete weights as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (R52) and follow orders for blood glucose monitoring and insulin administration for 1 of 1 resident (R37).Findings include: R16's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R16 had diagnoses which included osteoarthritis of knee, postconcussional syndrome (a set of symptoms that can persist for weeks, months, or years after a concussion or traumatic brain injury), depression, muscle weakness, trigeminal neuralgia (a chronic pain condition affecting the trigeminal nerve in the face), constipation, and diabetes. R16's MDS identified R16 was cognitively intact, had impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain controlled medication accounting for facility stock medication and for 1 of 1 resident (R262) reviewed for medication side effects. The facility failed to ensure residents were free from medication errors for 1 of 1 resident (R262) who didn't receive their medication as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to remove expired facility stock medication which had to potential to affect any resident needing facility stock medication. Findings include: R262's admission Record dated 6/26/25, identified an admission date of 6/17/25 and a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D, a condition characterized by stomach pain, cramping and diarrhea).R262 had a provider order dated 6/17/25, for the medication eluxadoline (trade name Viberzi, a schedule IV-controlled substance used to treat IBS-D) oral tablet 75 milligrams (mg) two time per day. Review of R262's medication administration record (MAR) for June 2025, identified the number 9 appeared on 6/19 and 6/25 for the 7 p.m. dose, and on 6/23 for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to maintain safe food storage temperatures. This practice had the potential to affect all residents consuming food at the facility. OR Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure beverages including milk were maintained and served at a safe temperature of less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F). In addition, the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures were maintained for proper sanitization of dishes. These deficient practices had the potential to impact all residents residing at the facility Findings include: The facility form Weekly Temp Logs included at the bottom of the form: Temperature danger zone is 41 to 140 F. All food has to be held above or below this until meal service is complete. The breakfast section of the form did not include a section to record beverage temperatures. The lunch and dinner sections had a place to record dessert and milk temperatures.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were within reach from the bathroom floor in resident bathrooms for 4 of 4 residents (R36, R47, R111, R6) reviewed for call light accessibility.Findings include:During an observation on 6/23/25 at 2:33 p.m., the bathroom call light cord in R6's room was approximately three feet from the bathroom floor. During an observation on 6/23/25 at 5:31 p.m., the bathroom call light cord in R111's room was approximately three feet from the bathroom floor. During an observation on 6/23/25 at 6:18 p.m., the bathroom call light cord in R36's room was approximately three feet from the bathroom floor. During an observation on 6/24/25 at 9:14 a.m., the bathroom call light cord in R47's room was approximately three feet from the bathroom floor.On 6/24/25 at 12:08 p.m., maintenance director (M)-A went to each bathroom (405, 407, 410, 413) and verified the call lights were too short, M-A stated the call light cord should be reachable from the floor in case of fall in the bathroom. On 626/25 at 12:48 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to get 1 of 2 residents (R36) out of bed when requested.Findings include:R36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R36 had diagnoses which included quadriplegia, fracture of surgical neck of left humerus with routine healing, anxiety, and depression. R36's MDS identified R36 was moderately cognitively intact, had no rejections of care, and was dependent on staff for bed to wheelchair transfers. R36's care plan dated 5/21/25, identified R36 had the potential for calling 911 if her call light was not answered fast enough or if she dropped something on the floor. Interventions included to try to answer the call light as soon as possible if not able to answer call light immediately to let R36 know when would be back (to give a length of time). In addition, R36's care plan dated 2/1/25, identified R36 had an activity of daily living (adl) self-care performance and required a mechanical lift with substantial maximal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure residents were comprehensively assessed for self-administration of medications for 1 of 2 residents (R20) reviewed for self-administration of medication.Findings include:R20's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20 had intact cognition with diagnoses that included heart disease, hypertension, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the protective layers covering the brain), Parkinson's disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs), anxiety, osteoarthritis, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).R20's provider orders reviewed on 6/25/25, included the following orders:-Advair Diskus inhalation aerosol powder breath activated 250-20 micrograms per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure bathing preferences were honored for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for choices.Findings include:R10's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 was cognitively intact with the diagnoses of congestive heart failure, diabetes and end stage renal disease. Section GG. indicated R10 required partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathing. R10's Care Plan Report last revised 5/7/25, identified R10 required partial/moderate assistance of one with bathing/showering. R10's care plan lacked identification of R10's preferences for personal hygiene and bathing.During an interview on 6/23/25 at 4:41 p.m., R10 stated they would like to have a shower two times a week. They didn't feel very clean by mid-week and felt like they were smelling a little. They really wished it could be two times a week, but nobody would do it. During an observation on 6/25/25 at 9:03 a.m., R10 was at the nurse station asking when they would…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the us of as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days or extended to a certain date with supporting rationale provided by the medical provider for 1 of 5 residents (R20) reviewed for unnecessary medication use.Findings include:R20's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20 had intact cognition with diagnoses that included heart disease, hypertension, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the protective layers covering the brain), Parkinson's disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs), anxiety, osteoarthritis, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).R20's provider order sheet reviewed on 6/25/25, identified order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the baseline care plan did not cover the required elements for 1 of 2 residents (R110) reviewed for care plans.Findings include:R110's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], was in progress. R110 was admitted [DATE]. R110's provider orders dated 6/26/25, identified R110 had diagnoses which included acquired absence of right leg below knee, diabetes mellitus, lymphedema (swelling, most often in an arm or leg, caused by a lymphatic system blockage), and reduced mobility. R110's orders included the following:-Consistency CHO (carbohydrate) diet Regular texture, Thin consistency, limit of potassium to 2000 mg (milligram) dated 6/11/25-Apply Sequential Compression Device to left leg QD (every day) for 1 hour one time a day related to LYMPHEDEMA dated 6/12/25-Observe closely for side effects of Diuretic medication including decreased PO (oral) intake, acute confusion, agitation, delusions, aggression, lethargy, decreased sweating, tachycardia, hypotension, orthostasis,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 of 6 residents (R13, R33) reviewed for care planning. Findings include:R13:R13's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R13 was cognitively intact with the medical condition of fractures and other multiple traumas with the diagnoses of hip fracture and lymphedema. MDS Section N. indicated R13 received opioid pain medication and a diuretic. Section GG. indicated R13 was dependent for showering, toileting, transfers, and required maximal assistance for dressing. R13's care plan date last revised 6/2/25, included the following:ADL self-care performance focus identified R13 required assistance of one with for dressing, oral care, and one to two staff for bed mobility. Personal hygiene and toilet use read I require (specify assistance) by (x) staff for both areas. R13's care plan did not identify nor include focus areas and interventions for hip fracture/weight bearing status,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise the care plans to reflect current care needs for 2 of 6 residents (R37, R52) reviewed for care planning. Findings include:R37:R37's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and hospice care. Diagnoses for R37 included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral hemorrhage affecting the right side, diabetes mellitus, pneumonia, chronic kidney disease stage three, and chronic gout.R37's care plan didn't indicate a hospice status or contain coordination of care with St. Croix Hospice. During an interview on 6/26/25 at 8:47 a.m., the HUC stated she didn't keep hospice paperwork for St. Croix, any documents they had should be in the hard chart. During an interview on 6/26/25 at 10:20 a.m., the DON would expect there to be a hospice care plan for R37.R52:R52's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified limited range of motion (ROM) in both lower extremities. Was dependent on assist of two for toilet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 100 rows in the source record cover these 42 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $278K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN