No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heritage Manor

321 Northeast Sixth Street, Chisholm, MN 55719 · Non profit - Corporation · 65 certified beds · (218) 254-5765 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse2 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
25 street · (218) 312-3015 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
121 W Lake St · (218) 254-3318 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
130 1st St SW · (218) 254-4961 · Call to confirm hours
Park
600 1st St NE · (218) 254-7942 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
302 1st Ave SW · (218) 254-2251

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.2%18.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.7%4.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.6%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%2.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.1%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.0%4.0%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened31.8%20.5%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.4%12.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%96.1%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%5.2%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control33.5%24.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.4%17.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%82.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.9%23.5%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.3%14.8%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
64.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.30
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 66% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.1%CMS range 43.0–67.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.7–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge64.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge54.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.—
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.96
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.80
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.41
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.51
RN hoursweekends
31.0%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 57.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19 ↑
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-07-31)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-07-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mental abuse for 1 of 4 residents (R71) reviewed for abuse. This led to psychosocial harm when the resident barricaded herself into her room and caused her to discharge early from the facility prior to reaching her maximal level with therapy services.Findings include:R71's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R71 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis of the right hip and major depressive disorder.R71's Census List dated 7/30/26, indicated R71 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged from facility on 12/30/25. R71 remained in the same room throughout their stay. R71's care plan dated 12/24/25, indicated R71 was a vulnerable adult related to physical condition. Goals included the resident would be free from abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation. The care plan lacked interventions to protect from abuse.A Minnesota Adult Abuse Reporting Center (MAARC) report received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to track and report lack of bowel movements to provider for 2 of 2 residents (R16, R52) reviewed for bowel tracking. This resulted in actual harm when R16 was hospitalized for constipation and subsequently taken to the operating room for disimpaction. In addition, the facility failed to monitor vital signs and complete weights as ordered for 1 of 1 resident (R52) and follow orders for blood glucose monitoring and insulin administration for 1 of 1 resident (R37).Findings include: R16's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R16 had diagnoses which included osteoarthritis of knee, postconcussional syndrome (a set of symptoms that can persist for weeks, months, or years after a concussion or traumatic brain injury), depression, muscle weakness, trigeminal neuralgia (a chronic pain condition affecting the trigeminal nerve in the face), constipation, and diabetes. R16's MDS identified R16 was cognitively intact, had impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with the current Combined Federal and State [NAME] of Rights. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents and their representatives who resided in the facility.Findings include:In response to a concern reported in 2026, R26 felt their rights had been violated when they resided in the facility for six days. A review of the facility's admission folder identified they were providing residents with the Combined Federal and State [NAME] of Rights dated 2/1/17.The most current Federal and State [NAME] of Rights has a date of 12/22/25.During an interview on 7/30/26 at 12:03 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated they did not know how residents received their admission packet. During an interview on 7/30/26 at 12:22 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-I stated residents can receive their admission packet in paper form or electronically.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-07-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan to reflect the resident's current needs for 4 of 4 residents (R25, R48, R3, R5) reviewed for care planning.Findings include: R25: R25's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severely impaired cognition and diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, malignant neoplasm of the lung, and secondary malignant neoplasm of the bone. R25 needed set-up assistance for eating, maximum assistance with toilet hygiene, and dressing the lower body. The MDS also indicated R25 was occasionally incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. R25's care plan dated 6/12/25 identified a focus statement for activities of daily living (ADL)s self-care performance deficit and included interventions for partial to moderate assist with showers, R25 able to complete upper, lower body and footwear independently, and was independent with eating, personal hygiene and oral care. R25 needed to be offered to bring to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to consistently educate, offer, or administer influenza and pneumococcal immunizations for 3 of 5 residents (R14, R48, R54) reviewed for immunizations.Findings include:R14's admission Record dated 7/31/26, identified an admission date of 3/4/26.R14's undated and unsigned Vaccination Consent didn't identify if R14 had previously had an influenza or pneumococcal vaccination or if R14 wanted, or was eligible for, these vaccinations. In the area where a resident or representative could sign, or the facility could document phone notification, it was written No! signed health unit coordinator (HUC)-G.R14's electronic medical record (EMR) identified R14 had received Prevnar 13 on 12/15/15, and influenza vaccine on 12/3/25. According to the CDC, R14 was eligible for shared decision making with their provider to decide if PCV20 or PCV21 should be administered as it was more than one year since the Prevnar 13 dose. R54's record didn't include evidence of shared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-07-31 · tag F0895 — pattern
    Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to implement an effective compliance and ethics program with sufficient monitoring and auditing mechanisms to detect and prevent potential violations and ensure the integrity of the data reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS). The facility further failed to ensure employees could report, without fear of retaliation, a high-level personnel's suspected violations. These failures resulted in documentation and minimum data set (MDS) irregularities with unsupported or inconsistently reported diagnosis for 4 of 4 residents (R31, R39, R40, R61) reviewed. Findings include: R31's admission Record identified an admission date of 1/25/23. R31's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], didn't contain diagnosis code F33.3 (Major Depressive Disorder Severe with Psychotic Symptoms) in section I. On 12/16/25, RN-A modified the 11/5/25 MDS to include diagnosis F33.3 under section I. R31's Diagnosis Audit Report identified F33.3 was added…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-31 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of and consented to medications prescribed and given for mental health intervention for 2 of 5 residents (R7, R33) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R7: R7's significant change in assessment (SCSA) minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of Parkinsons, anxiety, insomnia, and bipolar disorder. R7's care plan dated 4/9/26, identified a focus statement for behavior related to bipolar disorder and anxiety. Interventions include target behaviors, non-pharmacological interventions, to administer medications per order and monitor for side effects. R7's provider order on 7/21/26, Depakote 250 milligrams (mg) by mouth two times per day for bipolar disorder. And an order on 5/31/26, gabapentin 300 mg by mouth three times per day for anxiety. R7's electronic medical record (EMR) didn't contain evidence of R7 having been educated on the risks, benefits, side effects, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-31 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to follow a self-administration of medication (SAM) form which indicated the resident should not self-administer medications. This affected 1 of 1 (R54) residents reviewed for self-administration of medications. Findings include: R54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R25 had no cognitive impairment. Diagnoses included anemia, multiple sclerosis, and seizure disorder. R54's Active Order Summary Report dated 7/30/26, lacked orders to keep any medications at bedside. R54's care plan dated 9/3/25, indicated R54 was unable to self-administer medications. Interventions included nursing responsibility to document, administer, and store all medications. R54's Self Administration of Medication (SAM) Evaluation form dated 8/21/25, indicated R54 could not self-administer medications and could not keep medications at bedside. On 7/27/26 at 4:18 p.m., medications including a tube of Diclofenac muscle cream, Biotin mouth wash,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident's (R5) Provider Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) was completed timely.Findings include:R5's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R5 had diagnoses which included heart failure (a medical condition where the heart does not pump blood effectively), dementia, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and heart disease. In addition, R5's MDS identified they were moderately cognitively intact and required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living.R5's POLST identified R5 signed their POLST document on 5/6/26, R5's provider did not sign the document until 7/30/26, after it was brought to the facility's attention that the document had not been signed by the provider.During an interview on 7/30/26 at 1:02 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) stated the admission coordinator would fill out the form with the resident or their decision maker and then it would go into the chart as an order. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-31 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure residents received notice of Medicare non-coverage for 1 of 4 residents (R78) reviewed for beneficiary denials. Findings include: A Medicare notice of non-coverage is required to be given to residents in advance of non-coverage for services covered under Medicare so that they have an opportunity to appeal the decision. R78's admission Record identified and admission date of 8/21/25, and a discharge date of 9/10/25.A review of R78's Financial Questionnaire from admission, identified R78's signature on the financial form.R78's Medicare denial form (CMS-10123) dated 9/5/25 and a managed care denial form (U Care) dated 9/7/25, contained R78's signatures, the signatures on each form didn't look similar to each other, and the signature on the 9/7/25 U Care form didn't look similar to the Financial Questionnaire form. R78's progress notes didn't reflect R78 had received their Medicare or UCare denial forms. During an interview on 7/31/26 at 10:44 a.m., R78 stated she did not recall signing any papers about Medicare…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to immediately report incidents of potential resident-to-resident abuse to the state agency (SA) within two hours, as required for 1 of 1 residents (R71) reviewed for abuse. In addition, the facility failed to ensure potential sexual abuse were reported to the state agency (SA), within 2 hours, for a resident with unexplained laceration of perineum for 1 of 1 resident (R43) reviewed for injuries of unknown cause. Findings include: R71: R71's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R71 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis of the right hip and major depressive disorder. R71's care plan dated 12/24/25, indicated R71 was a vulnerable adult related to physical condition. Goals included the resident would be free abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation. Interventions lacked interventions to protect from abuse. R71's progress notes from 12/25/25 to 12/30/25, were reviewed and showed the following: 12/27/25 at 2:28 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to conduct a formal investigation into the allegations of resident-on-resident mental abuse for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (R71) for abuse. The facility also failed to investigate a possible sexual abuse when a resident had unexplained laceration of perineum. This affected 1 of 4 residents (R43) reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R71: R71's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R71 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis of the right hip and major depressive disorder. R71's care plan dated 12/24/25, indicated R71 was a vulnerable adult related to physical condition. Goals included the resident would be free abuse, neglect, or financial exploitation. Interventions lacked interventions to protect from abuse. R71's progress notes from 12/25/25 to 12/30/25, were reviewed and showed the following: 12/27/25 at 2:28 p.m., R71 approached nurse and reported R72 was in her room multiple times the night before and scared R71.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-31 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to provide the required written notices before a transfer to the hospital for 1 of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for hospitalization.Findings include:R7's significant change in condition assessment (SCSA) minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of right-side affected hemiplegia and hemiparesis, congestive heart failure (CHF), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).R7's progress notes dated 7/27/26, didn't include information regarding a bed-hold.During an interview on 7/30/26 at 1:25 p.m., registered nurse (RN)-E stated they would ask the resident or representative if they would want a bed-hold and then they let social services director (SS)-C know. RN-E stated the nurses didn't use a form; she thought SS-C went over the form. During an interview on 7/30/26 at 1:26 p.m., SS-C stated the charge nurse would ask family if they would like a bed-hold and then make a progress note regarding verbal bed-hold obtained,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data sets (MDS) was completed accurately and timely for 1 of 3 residents (R25) reviewed for activities of daily living, and 1 of 4 residents (R69) reviewed for quality of care and 1 of 1 resident (R43) for oral/dental. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the integrity of MDS data submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for 4 of 4 residents (R31, R39, R40, R61) reviewed for MDS accuracy.Findings include: R25: Per the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the resident assessment instructions (RAI) manual, a significant change in assessment (SCSA) must be completed less by the end of the 14th day following determination that a significant change has occurred or 14 days after the assessment reference date (ARD). R25's SCSA MDS with an ARD of 4/9/26, identified moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of lung, and secondary neoplasm of bone. The RN assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to include dialysis to a resident's comprehensive care plan, who received dialysis while in the facility. This affected 1 of 1 (R2) residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans.Findings include:R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R2 was cognitively intact. Diagnoses included anemia, hypertension, and end stage renal disease. Section O: Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs indicated R2 received dialysis while at the facility.R2's Active Order Summary Report dated 7/30/26, indicated an order to monitor perma-catheter site for pain, swelling, or signs of infection. The order summary report lacked orders related to R2's dialysis.R2's care plan lacked a care plan related to R2's dialysis and interventions to treat the dialysis, until a care plan was initiated on 7/28/26. During an interview on 7/28/26 at 12:49 p.m., R2 stated dialysis was received through the dialysis center in Hibbing, Mn on Tuesday, Thursday, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure orders were followed as written for 1 of 1 resident (R28) reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R28 had diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis (a long-lasting disease of the brain and spinal cord), diabetes mellitus, persistent atrial fibrillation (a common irregular heart rhythm where the upper heart chamber beats fast and out of sync with the lower chambers), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, heart failure (a chronic condition where the heart muscle cannot pump blood and oxygen well enough to meet the body's needs). In addition, R28's MDS identified he was cognitively intact and was dependent on staff for assistance with activities of daily living.During an interview on 7/30/26 at 4:24 p.m., family member (FM)-N expressed concerns about therapies not being continued since the new physical therapy department started. FM-N stated they had talked with the facility about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to ensure safe ambulation interventions were followed for 2 of 2 residents (R14, R75) reviewed. In addition, the facility failed to ensure resident equipment concerns were addressed in a timely manner to help prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (R9) reviewed for accident and safety concerns. Findings include: R14: R14's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R14 was severely cognitively impaired. R14's diagnoses included acute on chronic congestive heart failure, acute on chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, difficulties in walking, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and weakness. R14's care plan revised 2/4/26 indicated that R14 required supervision with touching assist of 1 staff for ambulating with front wheeled walker (FWW). R14's physical therapy (PT) treatment encounter notes dated 6/10/26, identified R14 was doing gait training with stand by assist (SBA) without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the tube feeding bottle was dated and timed when opened for 1 of 1 resident (R3) reviewed for tube feeding cares. Findings include:R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R3 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia/hemiparesis (complete or severe paralysis on one side of the body/mild to moderate weakness on one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort when swallowing foods, liquids, or even saliva), hyperlipidemia, aphasia (a brain disorder that affects how one speaks, reads, writes, and understanding what other people say), hypertension. In addition, R3's MDS identified she had unclear speech, was severely cognitively impaired, and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. R3's MDS also identified R3 received tube feedings.R3's current physician's orders reviewed on 7/28/26, identified she had orders for nocturnal feedings Jevity 1.5 at 83 milliliters (ml) per hour from 7:00 p.m. to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide hygienic care of oxygen and nebulizer equipment for 1 of 1 resident (R7) reviewed for respiratory care.Findings include:R7's significant change in status assessment (SCSA) minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and hemiplegia/hemiparesis r/t subarachnoid hemorrhage right side affected, Parkinsons, CHF, a-fib, COPD, anxiety, GERD, DM, dysphagia, insomnia, bipolar, acute pain, anemiaR7's care plan dated 4/10/26 identified oxygen therapy related to acute respiratory failure and CHF. Interventions included oxygen therapy, providing medications as ordered, monitoring for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and report, oxygen setting at two liters per minute (LPM) to keep oxygen saturations above 88%.R7's provider order dated 11/18/25 identified oxygen at 2 LPM to keep oxygen saturations above 88% every shift. An additional order on 4/2/26 identified oxygen at one to four liters for shortness of breath as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently used personal protective equipment (PPE) in resident rooms where precautions were in place to help prevent the spread of bacteria and potential for illness for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for infection control. This deficient practice had the potential to cause illness for residents, staff, and visitors. In addition, the facility failed to ensure hygienic laundry practices to help minimize potential for bacteria growth.Findings include: R1: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R1 was cognitively intact. R1's diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, and sleep apnea. R1's care plan dated 7/28/26, identified R1 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) related to a history of Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) infection in their urine and directed staff to follow EBP. R1's orders included Enhanced Barrier…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient numbers of staff to ensure all resident cares including getting residents out of bed when requested for 1 of 2 resident (R36) reviewed for choices, monitoring for and treating constipation for 1 of 2 (R16) and monitoring residents receiving dialysis for 1 of 1 resident (R111) reviewed for dialysis care. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include:Staff and Resident Interviews/Observations:On 6/23/25 at 2:53 p.m., R110 stated she had taken herself to the bathroom (said she had already waited 40 minutes) and was fearful of soiling self. R110 was tearful during the interview and further stated she had put on her artificial leg on to complete the transfer (even though she had not been cleared by therapy to do so). On 6/24/24 at 8:30 a.m., family member (FM)-F stated therapy had told them at the beginning of May there were only two nursing assistants for the entire…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain controlled medication accounting for facility stock medication and for 1 of 1 resident (R262) reviewed for medication side effects. The facility failed to ensure residents were free from medication errors for 1 of 1 resident (R262) who didn't receive their medication as ordered. In addition, the facility failed to remove expired facility stock medication which had to potential to affect any resident needing facility stock medication. Findings include: R262's admission Record dated 6/26/25, identified an admission date of 6/17/25 and a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D, a condition characterized by stomach pain, cramping and diarrhea).R262 had a provider order dated 6/17/25, for the medication eluxadoline (trade name Viberzi, a schedule IV-controlled substance used to treat IBS-D) oral tablet 75 milligrams (mg) two time per day. Review of R262's medication administration record (MAR) for June 2025, identified the number 9 appeared on 6/19 and 6/25 for the 7 p.m. dose, and on 6/23 for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to ensure food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety by failing to maintain safe food storage temperatures. This practice had the potential to affect all residents consuming food at the facility. OR Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure beverages including milk were maintained and served at a safe temperature of less than 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F). In addition, the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures were maintained for proper sanitization of dishes. These deficient practices had the potential to impact all residents residing at the facility Findings include: The facility form Weekly Temp Logs included at the bottom of the form: Temperature danger zone is 41 to 140 F. All food has to be held above or below this until meal service is complete. The breakfast section of the form did not include a section to record beverage temperatures. The lunch and dinner sections had a place to record dessert and milk temperatures.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were within reach from the bathroom floor in resident bathrooms for 4 of 4 residents (R36, R47, R111, R6) reviewed for call light accessibility.Findings include:During an observation on 6/23/25 at 2:33 p.m., the bathroom call light cord in R6's room was approximately three feet from the bathroom floor. During an observation on 6/23/25 at 5:31 p.m., the bathroom call light cord in R111's room was approximately three feet from the bathroom floor. During an observation on 6/23/25 at 6:18 p.m., the bathroom call light cord in R36's room was approximately three feet from the bathroom floor. During an observation on 6/24/25 at 9:14 a.m., the bathroom call light cord in R47's room was approximately three feet from the bathroom floor.On 6/24/25 at 12:08 p.m., maintenance director (M)-A went to each bathroom (405, 407, 410, 413) and verified the call lights were too short, M-A stated the call light cord should be reachable from the floor in case of fall in the bathroom. On 626/25 at 12:48 p.m., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to get 1 of 2 residents (R36) out of bed when requested.Findings include:R36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R36 had diagnoses which included quadriplegia, fracture of surgical neck of left humerus with routine healing, anxiety, and depression. R36's MDS identified R36 was moderately cognitively intact, had no rejections of care, and was dependent on staff for bed to wheelchair transfers. R36's care plan dated 5/21/25, identified R36 had the potential for calling 911 if her call light was not answered fast enough or if she dropped something on the floor. Interventions included to try to answer the call light as soon as possible if not able to answer call light immediately to let R36 know when would be back (to give a length of time). In addition, R36's care plan dated 2/1/25, identified R36 had an activity of daily living (adl) self-care performance and required a mechanical lift with substantial maximal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure residents were comprehensively assessed for self-administration of medications for 1 of 2 residents (R20) reviewed for self-administration of medication.Findings include:R20's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20 had intact cognition with diagnoses that included heart disease, hypertension, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the protective layers covering the brain), Parkinson's disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs), anxiety, osteoarthritis, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).R20's provider orders reviewed on 6/25/25, included the following orders:-Advair Diskus inhalation aerosol powder breath activated 250-20 micrograms per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure bathing preferences were honored for 1 of 1 resident (R10) reviewed for choices.Findings include:R10's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R10 was cognitively intact with the diagnoses of congestive heart failure, diabetes and end stage renal disease. Section GG. indicated R10 required partial/moderate assistance with shower/bathing. R10's Care Plan Report last revised 5/7/25, identified R10 required partial/moderate assistance of one with bathing/showering. R10's care plan lacked identification of R10's preferences for personal hygiene and bathing.During an interview on 6/23/25 at 4:41 p.m., R10 stated they would like to have a shower two times a week. They didn't feel very clean by mid-week and felt like they were smelling a little. They really wished it could be two times a week, but nobody would do it. During an observation on 6/25/25 at 9:03 a.m., R10 was at the nurse station asking when they would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the us of as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days or extended to a certain date with supporting rationale provided by the medical provider for 1 of 5 residents (R20) reviewed for unnecessary medication use.Findings include:R20's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R20 had intact cognition with diagnoses that included heart disease, hypertension, hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the protective layers covering the brain), Parkinson's disease, chronic atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ongoing lung condition caused by damage to the lungs), anxiety, osteoarthritis, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).R20's provider order sheet reviewed on 6/25/25, identified order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the baseline care plan did not cover the required elements for 1 of 2 residents (R110) reviewed for care plans.Findings include:R110's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], was in progress. R110 was admitted [DATE]. R110's provider orders dated 6/26/25, identified R110 had diagnoses which included acquired absence of right leg below knee, diabetes mellitus, lymphedema (swelling, most often in an arm or leg, caused by a lymphatic system blockage), and reduced mobility. R110's orders included the following:-Consistency CHO (carbohydrate) diet Regular texture, Thin consistency, limit of potassium to 2000 mg (milligram) dated 6/11/25-Apply Sequential Compression Device to left leg QD (every day) for 1 hour one time a day related to LYMPHEDEMA dated 6/12/25-Observe closely for side effects of Diuretic medication including decreased PO (oral) intake, acute confusion, agitation, delusions, aggression, lethargy, decreased sweating, tachycardia, hypotension, orthostasis,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 of 6 residents (R13, R33) reviewed for care planning. Findings include:R13:R13's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R13 was cognitively intact with the medical condition of fractures and other multiple traumas with the diagnoses of hip fracture and lymphedema. MDS Section N. indicated R13 received opioid pain medication and a diuretic. Section GG. indicated R13 was dependent for showering, toileting, transfers, and required maximal assistance for dressing. R13's care plan date last revised 6/2/25, included the following:ADL self-care performance focus identified R13 required assistance of one with for dressing, oral care, and one to two staff for bed mobility. Personal hygiene and toilet use read I require (specify assistance) by (x) staff for both areas. R13's care plan did not identify nor include focus areas and interventions for hip fracture/weight bearing status,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to revise the care plans to reflect current care needs for 2 of 6 residents (R37, R52) reviewed for care planning. Findings include:R37:R37's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and hospice care. Diagnoses for R37 included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral hemorrhage affecting the right side, diabetes mellitus, pneumonia, chronic kidney disease stage three, and chronic gout.R37's care plan didn't indicate a hospice status or contain coordination of care with St. Croix Hospice. During an interview on 6/26/25 at 8:47 a.m., the HUC stated she didn't keep hospice paperwork for St. Croix, any documents they had should be in the hard chart. During an interview on 6/26/25 at 10:20 a.m., the DON would expect there to be a hospice care plan for R37.R52:R52's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], identified limited range of motion (ROM) in both lower extremities. Was dependent on assist of two for toilet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and supplies were properly managed for 1 of 1 resident (R211) who was reviewed for oxygen use. Findings include: R 211's admit Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R211 was mildly cognitively impaired with the diagnoses of emphysema and congestive heart failure.R211's Care Plan Report last revised 6/8/25, included R211's use of humidified oxygen of 1 to 4 liters related to diagnoses of congestive heart failure and emphysema.R211's Treatment and Medication Administration Record dated between 6/1/25 and 6/24/25, did not include documented oxygen tubing and/or bubbler changes. During an observation on 6/23/25 at 6:48 p.m., R211 was wearing oxygen tubing that was connected to an oxygen concentrator with bubbler (container with water to add moisture to received oxygen). Neither the oxygen tubing or bubbler were dated. R211 stated they were not sure when their oxygen tubing had last been changed.During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review the facility failed to follow dialysis orders for 1 of 1 resident (R111) reviewed for dialysis care. Findings include:R111's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R111 had diagnoses which included dissection of thoracoabdominal aorta, anxiety, dependence on renal dialysis, and seizures. In addition, R111's MDS identified she was moderately cognitively intact, had no rejections of care and was receiving dialysis. R111's Order Summary report identified the following:Daily weights, update medical doctor for weight gain more than two pounds per day or five pounds per week. Dated 6/9/25.Ensure the dressing on the double lumen right internal jugular tunneled-site is intact. If comes loose re-secure, or replace dressing with a Tegaderm. Keep dressing clean and dry and lumens covered. Two times a day. Dated 6/9/25.R111's electronic treatment administration record (eTAR) identified the following:Daily weights missing on 6/13/25, 6/16/25, 6/18/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for 2 of 4 residents (R37, R48) observed to receive medication. A total of three errors out of 34 opportunities were identified resulting in a facility error rate of 8%. Findings include: R37:R37's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified intact cognition and hospice care. Diagnoses for R37 included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral hemorrhage affecting the right side, diabetes mellitus (DM), pneumonia, chronic kidney disease stage three, and chronic gout. R37's medication administration record (MAR) for June 2025, identified an order on 4/2/25 for tart cherry ultra oral capsules 1200 milligrams (mg), give two capsules by mouth two times per day related to gout. During an observation and interview on 6/25/25 at 9:09 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-E was preparing R37's medications for administration and noted there was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the hospice medical record for 1 of 1 resident (R37) reviewed for hospice care. Findings include:R37's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified intact cognition and hospice care. Diagnoses for R37 included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral hemorrhage affecting the right side, diabetes mellitus, pneumonia, chronic kidney disease stage three, and chronic gout.R37's care plan didn't indicate a hospice status or contain coordination of care with St. Croix Hospice. During an observation and interview on 6/26/25 at 8:38 a.m., R37's St. Croix Hospice binder was stored at the central nurse's station, it didn't contain any information. R37's hard chart was also stored at the nurse's station, and that chart didn't contain any hospice information. The hospice binder had sections for hospice contact information, admission documentation, charting forms for nursing assistants (NA)s, nurses, and care plans, all of which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and document review, the facility failed to have infection control measures in place for a resident colonized with a multi-drug-resistant bacteria (MDRO, bacteria resistant to one or more classes of antimicrobial agents) for 1 of 1 resident (R41) reviewed for infection control. Findings include: R41's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified intact cognition and diagnoses of obstructive and reflux uropathy, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, non-malignant swelling of the prostate), and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL, enzymes produced by certain types of bacteria that make them resistant to many common antibiotics) resistance, and urinary tract infection (UTI). The MDS also indicated R41 was occasionally incontinent of urine and had no catheter or toileting plan. R41's care plan dated 1/31/25, identified an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit with interventions to assist with toilet use and hygiene when R41 requested. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0731 — widespread
    Request a waiver if it can't meet the nurse staffing requirements.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide licensed nursing staff on a 24 hour basis for 8 days in the first quarter of fiscal year 2024. Findings include: The facility's certification and survey provider enhanced report (CASPER) identified 20 days between October 1st 2023 and December 31st 2023 when there was no licensed nursing staff in the facility. During interview on 5/17/24 at 10:52 a.m., director of nursing (DON) stated the facility was staffed well now and the gaps in the CASPER were a result of their payroll software not working correctly. The facility's payroll records confirmed the following days included gaps of 6 hours or more with no licensed nursing staff: -10/7/23, gap in coverage on night shift -10/15/23, gap in coverage on night shift -10/22/23, gap in coverage on night shift -11/5/23, gap in coverage on night shift -11/11/23, gap in coverage on night shift -11/18/23, gap in coverage on night shift -11/19/23, gap in coverage on night shift -12/17/23, gap in coverage on night shift Information on payroll software problem was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform an elopement risk assessment for 1 of 1 (R1) resident reviewed for elopement. Findings include: R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and included diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, dementia without behavioral or psychotic disturbance, major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms. R1's provider orders dated 4/12/24, identified an order for staff to check placement and function of a wanderguard located on R1's right ankle, using a hand-held device to check the battery function each shift and to ensure R1 had not removed the device. R1's care plan dated 8/21/23, identified a risk for wandering with interventions to have a wander guard in place to right ankle, move closer to nurse's station for supervision due to wandering, encourage to attend activities during highest wandering times. R1's medical record did not contain an assessment for elopement risk. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review the facility failed to implement occupational therapy (OT) orders for proper wheelchair positioning for 1 or 2 residents (R31) reviewed for positioning. Findings include: R31's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified R31's diagnoses include Dementia, generalized muscle weakness, and hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body). R31 was severely cognitively impaired, used a wheelchair, and required substantial/maximum assistance with dressing, grooming, and transferring. R31's care plan dated 6/23/22, identified to keep side supports in wheelchair when resident up in wheelchair to prevent leaning to the left. Therapy progress note dated 3/6/24, states evaluation for wheelchair positioning completed. Resident was provided with lateral side wedges to further prevent leaning to left side. Please keep side supports in wheelchair when resident up in chair. During observation's on 5/14/24 from 1:03 p.m. to 6:31 p.m., R31 was observed hunched forward…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe positioning for a resident with a feeding tube, while the tube feeding was running for 1 of 1 resident (R37) reviewed for tube feeding care. Findings include: R37's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], identified severe cognitive impairment and diagnoses of Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia (uncontrollable, uncoordinated movements), respiratory failure, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, and dysphagia (a swallowing disorder). R37 was dependent on staff for oral hygiene, needed maximum assistance for bed mobility, and had a feeding tube. R37's provider orders dated 2/9/24, identified a nothing by mouth order, to provide medications via feeding tube only, and to keep head of bed (HOB) at 45 to 60 degrees for all feedings and flushes. Feeding times were 3 a.m., 9 a.m., 3 p.m., and 9 p.m. at 85 milliliters (mL) per hour. R37's care plan dated 4/27/23, identified R37 received nutrition through a feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed in a timely manner for 1 of 1 residents (R17) reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: R17's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], included diagnoses of heart failure, anxiety, type 2 diabetes, and a thyroid disorder. R17's physician orders dated 12/20/23, identified staff should change oxygen tubing weekly on Monday night shift. During observation on 5/14/24 at 12:22 p.m., oxygen tubing did not have a date. During observation on 5/17/24 at 9:12 a.m., oxygen tubing did not have a date. R17's treatment record indicated oxygen tubing was not changed in April or in May. During interview on 5/17/24 at 10:10 a.m., certified nursing assistant (CNA)-A stated nurses are responsible for changing oxygen tubing per orders. CNA-A confirmed there was no date on the oxygen tubing. During interview on 5/17/24 at 10:40 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN)-A stated nurses are responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BACH, CURTISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/28/2024
DRIPPS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2016
EHLERS, DOUGLASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
GOODNOUGH, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
GRAMM, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
LAIR, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LIENEMANN, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LUETMER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
NELSON, PATRICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
PETERSON-DEVRIES, CAMIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2022
RAW, CAROLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/16/2005
RENTZ, LAURAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
RENTZ, PAULIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
SCHNEIDER, TODDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2013
WIESE, LORRAINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/25/2017
BIG STONE THERAPIES, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2015
EIDE BAILLY LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/03/2023
ST. FRANCIS HEALTH SERVICES OF MORRIS, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/10/2002
ANDERSON, EMILYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/02/2017
BAY, ESAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/07/2025
BLEVINS, ROSANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/18/2018
BURROWS, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2024
CASPERS, MEGANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/29/2014
COPEMAN, JEFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
HANNEKEN, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/20/2022
HEJHAL, ROXANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/10/2023
HOFMANN, REEDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2023
INCONTRO, ELISABETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/17/2013
JUST, MATTHEWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
MARLOW, JINAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/06/2022
MCGRAW, CINDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/15/1988
RENTZ, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/22/2024
ROCHE, SHANEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/08/2017
RYAN, BENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/27/2012
RYAN, GEOFFREYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/12/1998
STOCK, KELSEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2022
THOMPSON, RENEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/10/2018
TOMOSON, APRILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/12/2021
TOWNLEY, GLENDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/08/1999
WALKER, AMYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2024
BARNARD, SHELLEYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
RAUSCH, AMYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/22/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 100 rows in the source record cover these 42 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$278K
Related-party expense3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 16%Other / private 37%

This home reported $278K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$463per resident / day
operating cost
$14,085per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$422per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Minnesota Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Minnesota
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,870/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,573/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-09-01 — CMS provider number 245245. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next